., . . . Trenor, J. M. (2011). Multiple perspectives on engaging future engineers. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(1), 48-88.7. Jonassen, D. H., Strobel, J., & Lee, C. B. (2006). Everyday problem solving in engineering: Lessons for engineering educators. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 139-151.8. Bowring, S., Epstein, A., & Harvey, C. (2014). Engaging First-Year Students in Team- Oriented Research: The Terrascope Learning Community Geoscience Research and Education (pp. 223-236): Springer.9. Heinricher, A., Savilonis, B., Spanagel, D., Traver, R., & Wobbe, K. (2008). Great Problems Seminars: A New First-Year Foundation at WPI. Paper presented at the ASEE Regional Meeting
, Howard T., 1983. Ecological and General Systems, New York, Wiley.39. Odum, Howard T., and Elisabeth C. Odum, 2000. Modeling for All Scales, New York, Academic Press.40. Odum, Howard T., and Elisabeth C. Odum, 2001. A Prosperous Way Down: Principles and Policies, Boulder, University Press of Colorado.41. Hall, Charles A. S., and Kent A. Klitgaard, 2011. Energy and the Wealth of Nations: Understanding the Biophysical Economy, New York, Springer.42. Meadows, Donella, Dennis Meadows, and Jorgen Randers, 2005. Limits to Growth: The 30-Year Update, White River Junction, Vermont, Chelsea Green Publishing.43. Meadows, Donella H., 2008. Thinking in Systems, White River Junction, Vermont, Chelsea Green Publishing.44. Naess, Arne, 1973. The
andcontextual listening.18 Whereas basic listening “refers to hearing or paying attention to the verbal and nonverbal messages of any speaker” and “is framed as a dyadic process ofspeaking (output) and hearing/receiving information (input),” contextual listening is moreappropriate for community engagement contexts (p. 124).18 Contextual listening is a multidimensional, integrated understanding of the listening process wherein listening facilitates meaning making, enhances human potential, and helps foster community-supported change. In this form of listening, information such as cost, weight, technical specs, desirable functions, and timeline acquires meaning only when the context of the person(s) making the
raciallyunderrepresented groups are underrepresented in institutions of higher education, overall, and inSTEM fields, in particular. For example, “Blacks, Hispanics, and other underrepresentedminorities together constitute 24% of the U.S. population, 13% of college graduates, and 10% ofthe college-degreed in S&E occupations.”7The Status of Women in Undergraduate EngineeringThe most recent national data for bachelor’s degrees awarded to women by discipline ispublished in the 2010 edition of the Profiles of Engineering and Engineering TechnologyColleges by ASEE (Figure 1). This data shows that undergraduate engineering is also impactedby patterns of territorial segregation, with high rates of bachelor’s degrees awarded to women inEnvironmental Engineering (43.1
the originally registered students logged in to the course toparticipate. Specifically, 94,788 unique students (~76% of the initial enrollments) were active inthe course (i.e., logged in to participate at least once), with 13,811 students active in the lastweek (~11% of the initial enrollments). Figure 3 shows a graph of the number of “activestudents” from week to week – i.e., students who logged in and participated in the course viacore video views or downloads, quiz/exercise/project submissions, and/or discussion forumactivity. These numbers do not tell us which students were active in which week(s) or whichspecific course activities attracted their attention; clearly, not all 94,788 unique students were
clearlyimply a need for engineers to be competent in systems thinking and teamwork/communication,to understand the issues of sustainability, and to work effectively on cross-disciplinary problems.A selected set of (mostly non-technical) KSAs identified as important by a survey conducted atthe ASEE-NSF workshop9 and which stakeholder(s) must be responsible to teach them (inpercentages) are shown in Table 1. The numbers within parentheses next to each KSA indicateits priority in the list of 36 KSAs identified through the survey. The sample data presented belowshows the critical role engineering educators have in instilling these KSAs in the futureengineering workforce.While some of the KSAs identified can be integrated into existing courses through
Education. 2014.[25] S Lester. “An introduction to phenomenological research”. In: Stan Lester Developments (1999), pp. 1–4. URL: http://www.psyking.net/HTMLobj-3825/Introduction\_to\ _Phenomenological\_Research-Lester.pdf.[26] Clark Moustakas. Phenomenological Research Methods. Sage Publications, 1994, p. 192.[27] Erin a. Cech and Tom J. Waidzunas. “Navigating the heteronormativity of engineering: the experiences of lesbian, gay, and bisexual students”. In: Engineering
–669 (2009).[2] C. Rorres, “The Turn Of The Screw: Optimal Design Of An Archimedes Screw”, Journalof Hydraulic Engineering, 126(1), 72–80 (2000).[3] M. Lyons and W. D. Lubitz, “Archimedes Screws for Microhydro Power Generation”, Proceedings of the ASME 20137th International Conference on Energy Sustainability & 11th Fuel Cell Science, Engineering and Technology ConferenceESFuelCell2013, ES-FuelCell2013-18067, pp. 1-7, Minneapolis, MN (2013)[4] D. M. Nuernbergk and C. Rorres, “Analytical Model for Water Inflow of an Archimedes ScrewUsed in Hydropower Generation ”, Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 139(2), 213–220 (2013).[5] C. D. McNabb, C. R. Liston and S. M. Borthwick, “Passage of Juvenile Chinook Salmon and other Fish Speciesthrough
, or the difference between what studentsindicated were their personal study habits compared to how they would tell a student who caresonly about understanding to study, reflecting on their epistemological beliefs. Elby found thatmost students study differently, focusing on formulas and practice problems rather than onconcepts and real-life examples, than how they would tell someone else who is trying to acquire Page 24.684.4a “deep understanding.”21(pS56) He concludes that “[s]tudents perceive ‘trying to understandphysics deeply’ to be a different activity from ‘pursuing good grades’...” as one result of studentsbelieving rote learning is
visualization, performed research in computer graphics for the U. S. Army Ballistics Research Lab, and consulted for a number of companies in the Memphis and Philadelphia areas. Dr. Kroos is a Fellow of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) and a member of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE). He served as Vice President of ASME in 2001 and served a three year term on the Council for Member Affairs. Dr. Kroos is the co-author a new engineering textbook on thermodynamics, titled Ther- modynamics for Engineers, published by Cengage Learning. The book becomes available in February 2014.Dr. Justinus Agus Budi Satrio, Villanova University
heuristic model, which“mirror[s] the structures and processes of experience” (p. 291). His purpose of seeking anunderstanding of the human experience of creating a mathematical model demonstratesoperationalization of the interpretive paradigm. Page 24.834.10Article III: Conversely, the purpose of the critical science paradigm is to critique ideologicalbeliefs or values to identify “potential for self-reflection and self-determination” for oppressedindividuals.6-7 In her article, Stanley sketches a possible scenario for a paradigmatic shift fromfemale to male control of technology to give women an opportunity to reflect on women’s role
design brief and personas. Key elements are: Market Analyses (Week 10). The final deliverable of this phase is a student presentation of market research, which includes analysis of the concept vehicle and those of competitors, to determine the strengths (S) and weaknesses (W). The presentation should also identify the needs, wants, and/or problems that drive the target market, in addition to determine the Opportunities (O) and Threats (T). Project Start Brief, Personas (Week 12). Project start brief and personas are completed. Systems Integration Concepts and Methods Course (Spring Semester of First Year, Weeks 17-32). The focus of this class is benchmarking, capturing full-vehicle targets
Detroit, Michigan metro area. Also, LawrenceTech received significant research TARDEC funding in the mid-2000’s for alternative energystorage and power systems in autonomous wheeled robotics. Over the years TARDEC has hadgreat interest in robotic systems development, and continues to communicate this to LawrenceTech.By 2007, as a result of these many related robotic, automation and autonomous vehicledevelopment activities, it became clear to Lawrence Tech faculty that the research, design anddevelopment of robotic related mechanical, electrical, computer and software systems where inmany ways unique, and could not be easily grouped into the traditional and often separate sub-disciplines of mechanical, electrical, computer and software engineering
development r. Fulfill commitments in a timely manner s. Discern and pursue ethical practices t. Contribute to society as an active citizenThese outcomes form an excellent basis for gauging how well the entrepreneurial mindset isbeing incorporated into student activities within a course, and will therefore be referred tothroughout later sections of this paper.As of January 2013, KEEN includes nineteen institutions across the U.S. The KEEN programprovides access to vital resources for building quality entrepreneurship education programs thatengage engineering and technical students including grants, faculty fellowships, capacitybuilding workshops, networking opportunities, and resources. More specifically, KEENprovides financial and developmental