,” ASEE 2017 Annual Conference, June 25 - 28, Columbus, Ohio.[10] Hsieh, S. (2019, June), Lessons Learned from Remote Access 3-D Printing Machine for Manufacturing Education,” ASEE 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June 15 - 19, Tampa, Florida. https://peer.asee.org/33061
2024 ASEE Midwest Section Conference Work in Progress: Improving economic equity in K-12 robotics exploratory activities Kasey Moomau, Emily Fitzpatrick, and Jessica Deters College of Engineering, University of Nebraska-LincolnAbstractThis work-in-progress paper presents an initiative to improve economic equity in K-12 roboticsexploratory activities through the development of a more affordable educational robotics systemand a pilot intervention program. The project aims to enhance STEM identity development forunderrepresented middle school students, particularly those from less affluent communities,while also fostering positive
, and veteran undergraduates in engineering. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 The Methodological Promise of ‘Narrative Inquiry’ for Exploring Student Veteran and Service Member Experience as ‘People in Relation’AbstractStudent veterans and service members (SVSM) represent a significant, yet vastly underutilized,human resource for strengthening and diversifying the nation’s science, technology, engineering,and mathematics (STEM) workforce. It is estimated that, by the year 2020, over 5 million post9/11 service members will have transitioned out of the U. S. Armed Forces. Yet, despiteadvanced technical skills and training and access to unprecedented levels of educational benefits,today’s
represented five initial partnering institutions andincluded IAs from both colleges of engineering and veteran resource offices. SVSM participantsincluded one White male, Air Force National Guard Servicemember studying mechanicalengineering and one Bi-racial Asian female, Army National Guard Servicemember studying civilengineering. Initial data and developing findings from both sets up participants are described in apaper published in the ASEE 2022 Annual Conference proceedings [17].2.2 Year 2 Brief SummaryIn Year 2 (Jul 2022-Jul 2023), the PI and graduate researcher worked with two undergraduatestudent researchers on project work over the course of 10 weeks in the summer of 2022 throughan NSF funded Research Experience for Undergraduates (REU
2023 ASEE Illinois-Indiana Section Conference Proceedings Exploring the Potential Benefits and Risks of ChatGPT in Engineering Education Sinan Onal Department of Industrial Engineering Southern Illinois University, Edwardsville sonal@siue.eduAbstractThis paper examines the potential benefits and risks of using ChatGPT, an AI-powered chatbot developedby OpenAI, in engineering education by generating sample questions and answers and solving samplemathematical problems related to course subjects in the industrial engineering curriculum. The
the course progresses.” We modified this from our previous prompt in Fall 2019: “Dosome initial research: use whatever sources that you would generally use to start exploring atopic. Find at least 3 of these sources.” We modified the prompt to reduce the potential impact ofstudents’ perceptions of the instructor’s expectations on this assessment for learning and avoidprompting students to select specific search methods or kinds of sources.The first prompt to find three sources enabled us to ask, “What kinds of sources did the studentsselect on their own?” We elected not to measure whether students selected paper vs. internetsources, since the pandemic made it difficult for students to access libraries. We sorted thestudents’ sources into the
of engineering education and training in the UnitedStates. While the 2019 SCR2 program was able to offer on-campus research experience andmentorship for the REU/RETs, the 2020 program had to go virtual to accommodate theextraneous circumstances posed by the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite this transition, the 2020program engaged 32 undergraduates and 12 teachers, who successfully participated in 12research projects across three host sites. Learning from the experience of the summer 2020virtual program, the 2021 SCR2 program was redesigned as a hybrid program and was able tobring six host sites together, offering 18 projects in which 47 undergraduates and 23 teachersparticipated. One major success of the program was the positive impact of remote
Services (FIS), and Turkish Airlines. He is a senior member of the Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), and a senior member of Institute for Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE); and a member of Engineers Without Borders International (EWB-I), American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), and Association for Information Systems (AIS).Dr. Darcy Ronan, Sacred Heart University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Impact on Computing Attitudes and Career Intentions in a Rotation-based Survey Course Darcy Ronan D. Cenk Erdil Isabelle Farrington College of Education School of Computer Science
, broadening student participation in engineering, faculty preparedness in cognitive, affective, and psychomotor domains of learning, faculty experiences in teaching online courses. He has published papers in several engineering education research conferences and journals. Particularly, his work is pub- lished in the International Conference on Transformations in Engineering Education (ICTIEE), American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), Computer Applications in Engineering Education (CAEE), International Journal of Engineering Education (IJEE), Journal of Engineering Education Transforma- tions (JEET), and IEEE Transactions on Education. He is also serving as a reviewer for a number of conferences and journals
Paper ID #30704Feel the force! An inquiry-based approach to teaching free-bodydiagrams for rigid body analysisEric Davishahl, Whatcom Community College Eric Davishahl holds an MS degree in mechanical engineering and serves as associate professor and engineering program coordinator at Whatcom Community College. His teaching and research interests include developing, implementing and assessing active learning instructional strategies and auto-graded online homework. Eric has been a member of ASEE since 2001. He currently serves as awards chair for the Pacific Northwest Section and was the recipient of the 2008 Section
2024 ASEE Midwest Section Conference Meta Systems Engineering Management Plan for a Digital Startup Manufacturing Facility Daniel I. Chikwendu1, Pedro C. P. Cupertino2, Sivaganeshwar Subramaniam1, Siddharth Alagiri1, and Dr. Adam C. Lynch3Department of Industrial Engineering1/Department of Aerospace Engineering2/Department of Applied Engineering3Abstract To thrive in the marketplace, startups need a clear plan to either develop or acquire andintegrate a system of systems or a system of interest that solves client problems and generatesmarket excitement, especially in the automotive and aerospace sectors. The focus is on
). Learning to Conduct “Team Science” through Interdisciplinary Engineering Research. In 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. 3. Knight, D. B., Davis, K. A., Kinoshita, T. J., Twyman, C., & Ogilvie, A. M. (2019). The Rising Sophomore Abroad Program: Early Experiential Learning in Global Engineering. Advances in Engineering Education. 4. Jesiek, B. K., Shen, Y., & Haller, Y. (2012). Cross-cultural competence: A comparative assessment of engineeringstudents. International Journal of Engineering Education, 28(1), 144. 5. https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting- engineering-programs-2022-2023/ 6. Miskioglu, E. (2018, June). It takes all kinds
-ISSN: 2320-0847 p-ISSN: 2320-0936[11] Fundamentals of Chemistry Lab Manual, Colligative Properties: Freezing Point Depression & Molar Mass,West Virginia Institute of Technology, Beckley, WV, 2019/2020.Proceedings of the 2022 ASEE North Central Section ConferenceCopyright © 2022, American Society for Engineering Education 8
engineering programs that isassessed using parts of the laboratory final exam is:Operate instrumentation effectively to obtain the required data.The following KPI is assessed using Part 2 of the laboratory final exam:Use appropriate tools to analyze data and validate experimental results.References[1] ABET, “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2018-2019,” 2017. [Online].Available: http://www.abet.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/E001-18-19-EAC-Criteria-11-29-17- FINAL_updated1218.pdf. [Accessed: Jan 18, 2018]. 8 Proceedings of the 2020 ASEE North Central Section Conference Copyright © 2020, American Society
Fall2019 - Fall 2021 are limited to 22 campers (average Pre-Soph GPA of 3.67, standard deviation of0.29) and 30 non-campers (average Pre-Soph GPA of 3.56, standard deviation of 0.40). These52 responses are analyzed and presented below.The self-efficacy results from Fall 2019 to Spring 2022 are shown in Figure 1. The data reflectan improvement of the campers’ self-efficacy from Pre-Camp to Pre-Sophomore. The effect ispronounced, and statistically significant, for both chemical engineering self-efficacy (0.36 pointincrease, p=0.0005) and coping self-efficacy (0.47 point increase, p=0.0015). Campers showvery slight increases in both chemical engineering and coping self-efficacy ratings from Pre-Soph to Post-Soph (0.06 point increase, p=0.74, and 0.07
/2016/06/10/important-role- faculty- members-play-advising-students-essay [Accessed: July 20, 2019].[10] J. W. Everett and Perez-Colon, M. (June 2015). Evaluation of a dual first year student advising program (Paper ID #12106). ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, Washington. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research.[11] J.M. Krush, J.M. and S. Winn, “Professional advisors and faculty advisors: A shared goal of student success,” Academic Advising Today, vol. 33, issue 4, December 2010. [Online]. Available: https://nacada.ksu.edu/Resources/Academic-Advising-Today/View- Articles/Professional-Advisors-and-Faculty-Advisors-A-Shared-Goal-of-Student- Success.aspx. [Accessed
-Circuit Voltage (FractionalOCV). The response of PV output power to the changes inenvironmental factors like solar irradiance and temperature was also examined.1. IntroductionSolar energy is clean, free, and abundant. It holds the potential to support a clean, reliable, andmore sustainable energy future. From the years 2000 to 2019, global cumulative installedphotovoltaic (PV) capacity has increased by 632.4 GW [1]. In 2019 alone, 116.9 GW of new PVwas installed. It was estimated that global solar PV installation in 2020 would increaseapproximately 132 GW from 2019. Despite the impact of pandemic on the economy, the UnitedStates installed 11.1 GW of solar PV in the first 9 months of 2020 which is the largest first 9-month total ever [2]. With the
] Association of Public & Land Grant Universities, Removing Bottlenecks: EliminatingBarriers to Completion, 2016. Available: https://www.aplu.org/library/removing-bottlenecks-eliminating-barriers-to-completion[9] National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, Supporting Students' CollegeSuccess. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2017.[10] The Omidyar Group, “Systems Practice”, 2021.[11] Chan Hilton, A. B., “Student Success and Retention from the Perspectives of EngineeringStudents and Faculty.” Paper presented at the ASEE Illinois-Indiana Section Conference,Evansville, IN, February 2019.[12] Chan Hilton, A. B., “Roles of educational developers in student success and retentionsystems,” Presented at 2018 POD Network Conference
SIEMENS trainer. To obtain the FANUC certification, thestudents will still have to complete a FANUC Online training session offered by FANUC Inc. Theinstructor who attended this training is Dr. Ma. The training was for four days: Monday 01/07/2019to Thursday 01/10/2019 (two for turning and the other two for milling).Future Work and Conclusion:This is a work in progress paper and continuous process of development. Another author veryrecently went for the FANUC Vision training for an internally funded project both received(another accepted paper in ASEE 2020). The main goal is to prepare the Mechanical EngineeringTechnology (MET) curriculum with mechatronics concentration where these instructors (authorsof this paper) can contribute heavily. A
, and freshman engineering courses in higher education institutions. Currently, she leads a team of faculty who are dedicated to providing first year engineering students with a high- quality, challenging, and engaging educational experience with the necessary advising, mentoring, and academic support to facilitate their transition to university life and to prepare them for success in their engineering discipline majors and future careers.Mr. Joseph Dygert, West Virginia University Ph.D student in aerospace engineering at West Virginia University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Retention-Focused, S-STEM Supported Program1.0 IntroductionThis work in
, pp. 1759-1773, 2016.[3] V. Tinto, "Learning Communities: Building Gateways to Student Success," The National Teaching and Learning Forum, vol. 7, pp. 1-11, 1998.[4] K. J. Cunningham, "Graduate Engineering Peer Review Groups: Developing Communicators and Community," presented at the ASEE 2019 Annual Conference, 2019.
Engineering Newsletter,” blogs.mtu.edu, 12- Nov-2019. Proceedings of the 2022 Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration Copyright ©2022, American Society for Engineering Education ETD 325[2] High Resolution Proportional Pressure Regulator. [Online]. Available: https://www.clippard.com/products/cordis-high-resolution-pressure-controls. [Accessed: 21-Mar-2021].[3] Maximatic Series Valves. [Online]. Available: https://www.clippard.com/products/electronic-valve-mme. [Accessed: 21-Mar-2021].[4] Product Information Force-measuring jaws FMS, Schunk, 17-May-2019. [Online
, vol. 107, no. 2, pp. 163–171, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.5195/jmla.2019.577.[6] H. Nerz and L. Bullard, “The literate engineer: Infusing information literacy skills throughout an engineering curriculum,” in Proceedings of the 2006 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Chicago, IL: ASEE, 2006.[7] J. M. Williamson, N. Rice, C. Tenopir, J. Kaufman, C. J. Faber, and R. M. Ellestad, “Best Practices for Engineering Information Literacy Instruction: Perspectives of Academic Librarians,” in Proceedings of the 2019 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, FL, Jun. 2019. Accessed: Oct. 17, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/best
Undergraduate Research Experience ( CUREs ). 2021 ASEE Southeast Section Conference.Kumbhar, S. R., Attar, A. C., & Telsang, M. T. (2018). Undergraduate research experience (URE): A new dimension in curricular redesign. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 2018(Special Issue). https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2018/v0i0/120927Mraz-craig, B. J. A., Daniel, K. L., Bucklin, C. J., Mishra, C., Ali, L., & Clase, K. L. (2018). Research and Teaching: Student Identities in Authentic Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experience. Journal of College Science Teaching, 048(01). https://doi.org/10.2505/4/jcst18_048_01_68National Society of Professional Engineers. (2019). Code of Ethics for Engineers.Noguez, J., &
completed, theinstructor would view the feedback each student provided to assign a grade for the peer-reviewportion of the project grade.Results & Discussion Overall student course performance was compared between the courses with team-basedmodel projects and individual-based physical-model projects. To do so, the final course grademean and standard deviation (SD) were calculated for instructor-taught courses with teamprojects (Fall 2018 and Fall 2019 semester; total sample size, n = 93) and those with individualprojects (Fall 2020 semester; sample size n = 90). Student T-tests were utilized and P-valuescalculated to determine statistical significance in student grade means between courses with teamand individual projects, where statistical
Students’ Stem Experiences Affect Their Interest in StemSubjects and Careers”, Ph.D. dissertation, Washington State University, 2019.[8] A. Unfried, M. Faber, D. S. Stanhope and E. Wiebe. “The development and validation of ameasure of student attitudes toward science, technology, engineering, and math (S-STEM)”.Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, vol. 33 no. 7, pp. 622-639, 2015.[9] K. S. Rawat, R. R. Mangham, O.D. Gooden and E. L. Stone. Impact of Engineering Design-Focused Summer Academy Experience on Interest Toward STEM Learning and Careers(Evaluation, Diversity), 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June, 2019.[10] M. W. Kier, M. R. Blanchard, J. W. Osborne and J. L. Albert. “The development of theSTEM career interest survey
, H. G. Murzi, and D. B. Knight, “Experiencing Cross-Cultural Communication on a Home Campus: Exploring Student Experiences in a Cultural Simulation Activity,” Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 187–214, 2019.[13] R. S. Emmett, H. Murzi, and N. B. Watts, “Teaching Ethical Photography to Deepen Global Engineering Competency,” presented at the 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Jun. 2020, Accessed: Mar. 01, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/teaching-ethical-photography-to-deepen-global-engineering- competency.[14] A. Mazzurco, B. Jesiek, and K. Ramane, “Are Engineering Students Culturally Intelligent?: Preliminary Results from a Multiple Group Study,” in
. Odstrcil, M. Matusu, J. Stöckel, V. Svoboda, G. Vondrasek, J. Zara. “Remote operation of the GOLEM tokamak for Fusion Education”. Fus Eng Des 112, pp. 1038-1044 (2016).[18] M. J. Mohammadi-Aragh, P. Beck, A. K. Barton, B. A. Jones. “A Case Study of Writing to Learn to Program: Codebook Implementation and Analysis”. Proc. 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, FL, USA, paper 26749 (2019).
Active Learning. Should it Continue, 2018 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition Proceedings, Salt Lake City, UT, June 2018. [7] C. J. Prust, R. W. Kelnhofer, and O. G. Peterson, “The Flipped Classroom: It’s (Still) All About Engagement”, 2015 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition Proceedings, Seattle, WA, June 2015.[8] D. J. Cheney, P. L. Dickrell, and L. Virguez, “Online versus Flipped Classroom: A Comparison of Hands- On Skills Development in an Introductory Circuit Analysis Course”, 2019 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition Proceedings, Tampa, FL, June 2019.[9] T.J. Reagan, S. Claussen, and E. Lyne, “Systematic Review of Rigorous Research in Teaching Introductory Circuits”, 2020 ASEE Annual Virtual Conference