: American Society of Civil Engineers These program criteria apply to engineering programs that include “civil” or similar modifiers in their titles. 1) Curriculum The curriculum must include: a) Application of: i) mathematics through differential equations, probability and statistics, calculus-based physics, chemistry, and at least one additional area of basic or formal science ii) engineering mechanics, materials science, and numerical methods relevant to civil engineering iii) principles of sustainability, risk, resilience, diversity, equity, and inclusion to civil engineering problems iv) the engineering design process in at least two civil engineering contexts v) an engineering code of ethics to ethical
deliverable.” 12. “Ethics in the Laboratory: Behave with highest ethical standards, including reporting information objectively and interacting with integrity.” 13. “Sensory Awareness: Use the human senses to gather information and to make sound engineering judgments in formulating conclusions about real-world problems.” [8]Although these outcomes are fairly complete, it could easily be overwhelming for an instructorto try and design a course to cover thirteen separate outcomes. A more common recommendationfrom pedagogy experts is to design a course to teach three to seven overall outcomes [9].Additionally, it is important to note that these learning outcomes are not specific to chemicalengineering, but cover skills general to all
reference to critical thinking. (2) The CEBOK2 outcomes on contemporary issues and historical perspectives; public policy, business and public administration; and globalization were eliminated as stand- alone outcomes and incorporated within the CEBOK3 outcome on professional responsibilities. (3) The CEBOK3 added a stand-alone outcome on engineering economics. (4) Separate CEBOK2 outcomes on teamwork and leadership were combined into a single CEBOK3 outcome. (5) The CEBOK2 outcome on professional and ethical responsibility was split into two CEBOK3 outcomes; and the new stand-alone professional responsibilities outcome was expanded in scope, as noted in (2) above. (6) In recognition
] “Problem solver” [5] “Problem Solving”Problem solving (E) X X [6] “Adaptive” [5] “Learning Organization”Continuing Education (S) X X [15]Work Ethic (S) X X “Ethics” [28] “Ethical Leadership” [29]Decision Making (M) X “Decision Making” [30] “ROOT and Business” [31] “BusinessBusiness Acumen (M) X
remark byCarol Christ in the previous section) that draws upon different kinds of knowledge and skills inorder to address complex, contemporary problems such as the Grand Challenges identified by theUS National Academy of Engineering. In particular, given our own specific types of expertise,we wanted students to come to appreciate that good engineering thinking, from the get-go,involves thinking about the ethical implications of what is being designed, rather than designingfirst and thinking about the ethical implications afterward. We wanted the course to afford anopportunity to students to come to have an appreciation of the similarities as well as thedifferences between engineering problem-solving and problem-solving in philosophy. We
discussed most oftenas cognitions, behaviors, and dispositions. We organized these into three broad categories:self-management, task management, and team management, which can be used as aframework for future research. By providing students the opportunity to own the problem andits outcomes, engineering competitions can empower students to think like, act as, andbecome professional engineers.IntroductionEngineering is a professional discipline. Engineers work largely within professional codes ofconduct and are often required to obtain professional licensure to practice. As a professional,they are not only required to abide by certain codes – such as ethics – but are also expected togain skills such as being able to communicate effectively
– Business & Public Administration, 19 – Globalization, 20 – Leadership, and Outcome 24 –Professional & Ethics. While there are multiple contributing factors for identifying a givenoutcome as challenging, in general the difficulty for most programs relates to the BOK-specifiedlevel of achievement for the outcome.A comprehensive analysis is presented of [University A’s] civil engineering curriculum withrespect to the BOK2 outcomes at the levels of achievement associated with the baccalaureatedegree. The current curriculum addresses, in some fashion, all 24 BOK2 outcomes. Theprogram fully addresses, to the recommended level of achievement, 6 of the 24 BOK2 outcomes;the remaining 18 BOK2 outcomes are not addressed to the specified level of
. When this reluctance is overcome, the mentoraccepts a new individual into her coterie, where the relationship becomes protected by an ethic ofcare [1]. From this point, the mentor’s decisions are focused on developing the individual andcaring for the mentor relationship. While active mentoring may only last for a few weeks to afew months, the result is a long-term social bond (I can think of three teachers who investedsufficient mentoring on me to develop such a bond).To establish a baseline for faculty involvement in the mentoring process, I took advantage of thefact that I have an entering, moderately under-prepared freshman son who wants to studyengineering. Because I know this student very well, I am particularly cognizant of his
this objective. The main topics discussed during the workshop are: (i) how to introducedesign experiences in first-year engineering curriculum, (ii) need to incorporate ethics instructionin Indian engineering programs, (iii) need to introduce hands-on learning to enhance earlylearning experiences of Indian engineering students, and (iv) how engineering curriculumdevelopment issues can be translated into PhD level engineering education research projects. Theworkshop was held on the campus of Infosys, Inc., a software giant in India. Two Americanstudents (Castles and Riggins), co-authors of the paper, accompanied the lead author and assistedin implementing the workshop activities. As one of the lead graduate students, Castle was deeplyinvolved
Rui Liu, Behnam Ghalamchi Cal Poly, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis ObispoAbstractThis study presents an in-depth exploration of the implications of integrating digital twins intoengineering education. Drawing on an extensive review of published research papers, conferencepapers, and case studies, the research is structured into several key chapters focusing on thedefinition of digital twins (DT), their relationship with engineering education, their influence ondiversity and inclusion, and their alignment with ethical engineering principles. The studyculminates in proposing a novel approach to integrating digital twins into engineering education.We propose a new lab for the mechanical vibrations course
the intrinsic motivation of students. Thus,arguably it also has a positive impact on learning experience. Existing literature does not identifywhat attitudes and practices can be implemented in schools of engineering to promote effectivecare in teaching. This paper describes the progress of an ongoing research currently carried out ata large engineering school in Chile. The investigation has two main objectives. First, tounderstand what does it mean to care in teaching; second, to understand what is the influence thatcaring teaching has on the students’ learning experience.IntroductionFrom a philosophical perspective [1], the ethics of care involves attending to and meeting theneeds of who we take responsibility for. It particularly values
anationally-representative sample of students, we discuss development of a sampling techniquebased on geographic location, engineering subdiscipline, and departmental size.GeographyGeographic differences have been hypothesized to contribute to cultural differences. Luproposes that “[t]he concept of culture recognizes that individuals from different backgroundsare exposed to different traditions, heritages, rituals, customs, and religions.”2 An exploratorystudy conducted by Judith Spain generated results that are consistent with the discussion thatgeographic differences influence values and ethics in school settings3. Spain found evidence thatthe region of the school influenced students’ decision making processes, and since theuniversities were
can be used by CareerServices professionals when coaching students (NACE, 2017).The career readiness competencies identified by NACE include critical thinking/problemsolving, oral/written communication, teamwork/collaboration, digital technology, leadership,professionalism/work ethic, and career management (NACE, 2017). In January 2017, an eighthcompetency – global/intercultural fluency – was added (NACE, 2017). They are described inTable 1 on the next page.Table 1: NACE Career Readiness Competencies Defined.Competency Definition Employer Rating Employer Rating of Student Self- Recent Graduate Rating
Paper ID #26126Work in Progress: Science and Engineering for Social Justice: CurriculumDevelopment and Student ImpactCamille Birch, University of Washington Camille Birch is a graduate of the Bioengineering and Computer Science departments at the University of Washington. She developed curriculum concerning the interplay of diversity and ethics for undergrad- uate engineering students at UW and is interested in the power of education to enact change in future generations of engineers. She currently works for Microsoft in the Bay Area.Celina Gunnarsson, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyDr. Dianne Grayce Hendricks
notonly about technical issues, but also about professional practice issues. Case study questionswere included on homework assignments and examinations. A detailed project plan has beenpresented elsewhere1.Project Results In surveys and focus groups, students were asked specifically about the technical lessonslearned, as well as their personal responses to the case studies. Survey questions linked studentachievement to the a – k ABET outcomes. Case studies are particularly useful for addressingthe outcomes concerned with professional and ethical responsibility, global and societal context,life-long learning, and contemporary issues. The latter two outcomes may be addressed bydiscussing recent collapses, such as the Pittsburgh Convention
topics.Figure 1: Book Cover Page 14.628.2Organization of the Book The short introductory chapter discusses the overall organization of the book, notes to thestudent, and sources for case study materials. After the introductory chapter, the other ninechapters address statics and dynamics, mechanics of materials, structural analysis, reinforcedconcrete structures, steel structures, soil mechanics/ geotechnical engineering/ foundations, fluidmechanics and hydraulics, construction materials, and management/ ethics/ professional issues.The chapters were written to parallel courses and topics typically taught in civil engineering, aswell as engineering
Paper ID #25087Engagement in Practice: CAD Education via Service LearningDr. David Che, Mount Vernon Nazarene University Dr. Che had worked in the industry for eleven years before beginning his teaching career. He first taught at Geneva College in Pennsylvania and then at Anderson University in Indiana before joining Mount Ver- non Nazarene University (MVNU) in Mount Vernon, Ohio, in 2016. He is now Chair and Professor of Engineering at MVNU. His research interests include CAD/CAM/CAE, automotive engineering, man- ufacturing engineering, mechanical design, engineering mechanics, engineering education, engineering ethics
approach to give students the opportunity to apply engineering principles at the smallestscales of BME (Bioinformatics), at the tissue level (Biomaterials Design and QuantitativeHuman Physiology), at the macroscale (Biomechanics) and, finally, to integrate principles fromall scales into the design of medical devices (Medical Devices) [4]. The objective of thiscurriculum is to provide students with a toolkit of important BME skills to make themcompetitive for industry careers as well as graduate school. An emphasis on design and project-based learning will help our students develop their communication skills, critical thinking, andtheir ability to work in teams. We plan to weave in issues of social responsibility and ethics intoour BME curriculum
provided inReference 6.Note that the Profiles are organized in terms of twelve differentiating characteristics—engineering knowledge, problem analysis, design/development of solutions, investigation,modern tool usage, the engineer and society, environment and sustainability, ethics, individualand team work, communication, project management and finance, and lifelong learning. Becausethese characteristics are logically distinct, they result in individually assessable graduateattributes. The remaining three columns contain the Graduate Attribute Profiles for WashingtonAccord (i.e., engineering) graduates, identified as WA1-WA12; Sydney Accord (i.e., engineeringtechnology) graduates, SA1-SA12; and Dublin Accord (i.e., engineering technician
rubrics with performance indicators that are being used in our Program. Together with the rest of the PIs, they represent significant leap toward improving our student outcomes assessment. Performance indicator for outcome C: To assess the ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraint as economic, environment, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability, the assessing faculty used to come up with learning score based on his or her “mental” picture regarding the students’ work in the classroom during the semester. Now under our new PI system, the score will be based on whether, and how well, the students Work within realistic
programs excel at developingstudents’ technical expertise and research skills. The interdisciplinary nature of many STEMresearch projects means that graduate students often find themselves paired with experts fromother fields and asked to work together to solve complex problems. At Michigan StateUniversity, the College of Engineering has developed a graduate level course that helps studentsbuild professional skills (communications, teamwork, leadership) to enhance their participationin these types of interdisciplinary projects. This semester-long course also includes training onresearch mentoring, helping students work more effectively with their current faculty mentorsand build skills to serve as mentors themselves. Discussions of research ethics
b: Prepare effective written materials. (3g) • Objective 2, Outcome d: Work effectively in multidisciplinary teams to complete Page 8.1226.1 projects. (3d) Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2003, American Society for Engineering Education • Objective 3, Outcome b: Articulate, identify, and evaluate contemporary ethical issues in biomedical engineering and their impact on society. (3f, 3h, 3j) • Objective 4, Outcome a: Assess, evaluate, and reference peer-reviewed technical
from classic engineering education toengineering practice in the real world. To meet this objective, both design and related contentessential to the practice of engineering need to be strategically implemented in the course.Related content includes several engineering management topics such as Leadership, ProjectManagement, Time Management, Effective Communication, Human Resources / Relations, andEngineering Ethics. It is a challenge to accommodate such topics due to time constraints or dueto the conventional practice of not covering them to a certain degree of rigor. This paperprovides a brief overview of the objectives of the Senior Design Project course. The need torelate engineering design and management in such a course is then addressed
engineers. Skills include a working knowledge of business and ethics,teamwork experience, a solid grounding in engineering science as well as communication andpresentation skills. The program develops abilities such as an appreciation of the basic principlesof business, the profit motive, how to design and execute experiments, how to prepare projectplans and regulatory documents, and how to carry out a real-life project within a company.Program emphasis is placed upon engineering creativity and innovation. with a strong emphasison the needs of the nation to compete in the world market and maintain the strength of the U.S.economy. A second objective of the paper is to describe the current status of a recentlydeveloped Professional Science Master’s
understanding of various subject areas required by ABET has been enhanced bypart-time and summer work experiences. In particular, the findings suggest that bothundergraduate and graduate students believe that three areas have been greatly enhanced withengineering work. They include structural engineering, project management/scheduling andestimating, and team work. In addition, undergraduates also perceive that their understanding ofhealth and safety issues, and ethical considerations has also increased. In contrast, graduatestudents believe that their knowledge of hydraulics/hydrology/water resources, constructabilityand economic factors has been enhanced by work experiences.I. IntroductionThe American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) believes that
urbaninfrastructure and equity as a subject for critical reading and writing. At Gonzaga University, amedium-size private university, a first-year seminar is designed as a multidisciplinaryexploration of infrastructure and equity. One of the primary learning outcomes of the course is todifferentiate the ways in which knowledge is constructed across multiple disciplines, soinfrastructure’s impact on society is viewed through the lens of sociology, history, public health,economics, and engineering. At the University of Colorado Boulder, a large research-intensiveuniversity, a 1-credit civil engineering seminar course touches on the topic of infrastructureequity through the lenses of engineering ethics and sustainability. In all three courses, studentscreated
) an ability to design andconduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data; (c) an ability to design asystem, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such aseconomic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability,and sustainability; (e) an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineeringproblems; and (k) an ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice. The other six deal with skills that are morenontechnical involving leadership, management, and interpersonal skills: (d) an ability tofunction on multidisciplinary teams; (f) an understanding of professional and ethicalresponsibility; (g) an ability to
Leveraging Large Language Models in Education: Enhancing Learning and Teaching Professor Hossein Saiedian The University of KansasAbstract. The integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) into education represents asignificant advancement in the realm of teaching and learning. This paper explores thepotential benefits, challenges, and ethical considerations surrounding the use of LLMsin education. Through a detailed analysis of various LLM tools, including ChatGPT, andpractical examples, this paper demonstrates how LLMs can enhance personalizedlearning, improve teaching practices, and empower both students and educators in thedigital age.Keywords
in Engineering Education from Purdue University.Chrystal S JohnsonSiddika Selcen Guzey, Purdue University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Project DECIDE: A K12 Civics and Engineering Education Curricular Partnership (Works in Progress)IntroductionMany have expressed concern about ethics and civic-mindedness of engineers and theirreflection on their responsibility and public impact of their work[1]. Universities hope tograduate ethical engineers, but may not have intentionality about the education towards civicresponsibility. Lin and Hess[2] argued that civic responsibility requires special attention inengineering education. Hess and Zola[3] found that few youth
ofengineering and computing as professions and disciplines. The course is designed to serve as afoundational exploration into the interconnected worlds of engineering principles andcomputational problem-solving. The course covers professional and ethical considerations, careerdevelopment, and communication skills vital for success in these fields. Students are alsointroduced to the resources available in MakerSpace, including but not limited to 3D printing, lasercutting, and microcontroller applications. Through hands-on projects and instructional activities,students explore fundamental concepts in engineering while fostering critical thinking andproblem-solving skills. This paper outlines the course, and the project structure details, andprovides a