Asee peer logo
Displaying results 1441 - 1470 of 12597 in total
Collection
2001 Annual Conference
Authors
Patricia C. Tempel; Hisham Alnajjar; Beth Richards; Andrea Brick Ader; Ronald Adrezin
on ethics to discuss the dilemma inmore detail. As noted above, students initially struggled to connect the ethics issue in the articleand the ethics issue presented by the guest speaker. However, they did identify strongly with thearticle, which they saw as relevant (one of the article’s protagonists was a just out of collegeengineer, pitted against the narrow minded senior engineer and other managers).For the final project, students engaged in mock debate/town meeting. Students were assignedroles in OurTown, Connecticut (townspeople, business investors, government regulators,municipal officials) and were required to research the pros and cons of augmenting OurTown’snearly full landfill with a batch incinerator. Students were required to
Conference Session
Sustainable Product Development and Manufacturing
Collection
2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Priya Manohar, Robert Morris University
Tagged Divisions
Manufacturing
AC 2012-4158: CASE STUDIES IN ENGINEERING ECONOMICS FORMANUFACTURING COMPETITIVENESSDr. Priya Manohar, Robert Morris University Priyadarshan Manohar is an Associate Professor of engineering at Robert Morris University, Pittsburgh, Penn. He has a Ph.D. in materials engineering (1998) and graduate diploma in computer science (1999) from the University of Wollongong, Australia, and he holds a bachelor’s of engineering (metallurgical engineering) degree from Pune University, India (1985). He has worked as a postdoctoral Fellow at Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh (2001-2003), and at BHP Institute for Steel Processing and Prod- ucts, Australia (1998-2001). Manohar held the position of Chief Materials Scientist at
Conference Session
Integrating Sustainability Across the Curriculum
Collection
2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Qiong Zhang, University of South Florida; Linda Vanasupa, California Polytechnic State University; James R. Mihelcic, University of South Florida; Julie Beth Zimmerman, Yale University; Simona Platukyte, University of South Florida
Tagged Divisions
Environmental Engineering
incorporatingsustainability into engineering education. Those challenges were later organized into majorcategories collectively by the workshop attendees. After the workshop, a “mind map” wasconstructed to show the identified challenges in relation to the major categories.Sixteen individuals registered for the first workshop and 4 of them were faculty from universitiesserving underrepresented groups. The second workshop was attended by primarily early-careerscholars (12 total participants). Of the 12 participants, 7 were female, 6 were under-representedminorities, 2 were from community colleges, and 6 were from Hispanic-serving institutions.Challenges identified in the workshopsIn the first workshop, over half of the group considered themselves in the “expert
Conference Session
Computer Science Applications
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Ryan J. Meuth, University of Advancing Technology
Tagged Divisions
Computers in Education
thesedemonstrations are clearly beneficial, as they serve to both break the monotony of an endlessstream of theory and equations, and to tie symbols to real-world phenomena, solidifying theirmeaning in the minds of pupils.5Hands-on laboratory work is highly regarded as a method for reinforcing learning by exposing Page 22.1648.2students to real-world applications and interactions. This is particularly important in theengineering disciplines, as there is a great deal of engineering culture that surrounds theoreticalphenomena under study (e.g. resistor color codes, the use of compilers and tools, etc.). Theseinitially mystifying and often confusing conventions
Conference Session
Exemplary Outreach Programs
Collection
2010 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Craig Gunn, Michigan State University
Tagged Divisions
K-12 & Pre-College Engineering
beliefs in the need to expose engineering students toart are vital to the profession.This same thought trail unwinds in the mind of David Snider, University of South Florida, who usesthe fine arts to broaden his students’ engineering perspectives. The National Science Foundation inits press release 06-127 comments that “On a college campus, it would be difficult to find twosubjects more different from each other than art and engineering. Yet on the campus of theUniversity of South Florida, one engineering professor responsible for teaching classes aboutdifferential equations and electromagnetism has created a popular course that merges his researchworld with the world of fine art.” 4 Snider is able to utilize the principles of engineering
Conference Session
ASEE Multimedia Session
Collection
2002 Annual Conference
Authors
Sheryl Duggins
Model proposed here incorporates the ideasof constructivism, operational definitions, process-improvement, and CMM-based maturitylevels and applies them to process teaching.While researching constructivism, the work of Harlan Mills 10 on the mathematical aspects ofbox structures came to mind. Box structures are the fundamental objects used for analysis anddesign of information systems in the box structure methodology. They are formally,(mathematically), defined, and I teach them in my graduate software engineering class on formalsoftware specification methods. There is nothing about box structures that is inherently relatedto CMM, or process teaching or learning, or constructivism. But I found it useful to depict myprocess-based model using
Collection
2008 Pacific Southwest Section Meeting
Authors
Bryan Cooperrider
onwhether these were present in their coursework. Of the ten criteria they established, engineeringstudents felt 9 of the 10 were missing, and the instructors felt only one was missing. Their studyled them to conclude “the environment and factors that impede creativity in engineering are farmore profound and dominant in the engineering education than they are in sciences educationand naturally far more than those in liberal arts education.” 19 The most important maxim, andone worth noting, is that designers must keep an open mind. It is easy to be blinded by currentparadigms, and without an open mind it is difficult to see the next great idea.One student approached the author of this paper after the class was chided for poorly formeddesign
Collection
2010 Fall ASEE Middle Atlantic Section Conference
Authors
David W. Dinehart; Timothy Harrington; Matthew Bandelt; Adam Beckmann
Development of a Model Middle School Engineering Club David W. Dinehart, Timothy Harrington, Matthew Bandelt, and Adam Beckmann Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Villanova University, Villanova, PA 19085AbstractThis paper provides a description of a service learning program developed in 2009 that focuseson creating engineering clubs for elementary school students. Villanova Community Action byNew Engineers, NovaCANE, was established with the initial membership limited to graduatestudents and upperclassmen interested in structural engineering. In the inaugural year the goal ofthe organization was to inspire young minds by offering hands-on educational opportunities
Collection
2010 ASEE Zone 4 Conference
Authors
Devlin Montfort; Shane Brown
331 Conceptual Change and Understanding in Engineering Education Devlin Montfort, Shane Brown Washington State UniversityIntroductionIn the study of science, technology, engineering and mathematics education there is a tradition ofevidence showing that students – despite their abundant procedural knowledge andcomputational skills – lack understanding of fundamental physical phenomena. Students can beacademically successful without internalizing the meaning of the problems and calculations theycomplete. For example, after an introductory physics course most students will
Collection
2014 ASEE Zone 4 Conference
Authors
Nebojsa Jaksic
(feasibility) ofthese ideas is also addressed. In engineering education, a number of techniques are implementedto develop creativity and enhance ideation capabilities of students. These techniques includebrainstorming2, brainwriting3, collaborative sketching4, morphological analysis5, transformationaldesign using mind-mapping6, design by analogy7, principles of historical innovators8, and variouscombinations of the aforementioned techniques9. Developing an ability to innovate has beenapproached through improvisation10, the theory of inventive problem solving (TRIZ)11-20, and theS-field (also referred as Su-field) theory21.One of the commonly used techniques in ideation is brainstorming (especially when solvinggeneric, non-engineering problems
Conference Session
Civil Engineering Division Poster Session
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Xi Wang, University of Mount Union; Charles Cope, Case Western Reserve University
Paper ID #36633Integrating Ecology and Sustainability into Civil EngineeringDesign: A Civil Engineering Capstone ProjectXi Wang (Assistant Professor)Charles Tucker Cope © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Integrating Ecology and Sustainability into Civil Engineering Design: A Civil Engineering Capstone ProjectAbstractBecause of the increasing demand from the industry to develop sustainable solutions, it hasbecome essential for engineering educators to teach students the knowledge and skills to engagein sustainable design. The application of sustainability
Conference Session
Engineering Technology Division (ETD) Technical Session 7
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Troy Curtis Tonner, Purdue University Fort Wayne
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Technology Division (ETD)
facilitating is needed for the heavy workload [20]. Additionally, when using team projects,PBL can be overused, and students can have a lower belief in their own ability to workindependently [19]. This further demonstrates the need to not overuse student engagementtechniques such as PBL [2], suggesting a balanced pedagogy approach should be taken.Looking at the examples and trends presented the questions are: 1. How does this translate to engineering technology? 2. How does this translate to a regional campus that historically has a large population offirst-generation students and commuter students?These are a couple of the many questions that come to mind when starting to look at theliterature when considering designing a FYET
Conference Session
Work-in-Progress Session: Supporting Students To, Through, and Beyond Transitions
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Cassandra Sue Ellen Jamison, Rowan University; Justin Charles Major, Rowan University ; Alexandra Mary Jackson, Rowan University; Cheryl A. Bodnar, Rowan University
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)
the engineering major [25].Simultaneously however, students’ need to “escape” from the stresses of engineering also raisesquestions in our minds about the cultures of engineering. We wonder whether it is seemingly“right” that students are forced to “leave” and be something else separate from being engineersrather than being able to bring their holistic selves into engineering. Our work will explore andaddress the above claims and concerns amongst our broader participant pool. We hope to create ahypothesis about engineering undergraduate students' involvement in engineering-adjacentactivities, furthering our understanding of how these activities affect their motivations.AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to acknowledge the contributions of
Conference Session
Faculty Development Lightning Talk Session 2
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Angelica Burbano, Universidad Icesi; Ana Judith Ledesma, Universidad Icesi; Dayana Alexandra Ordoñez
Tagged Divisions
Faculty Development Division
limitations at the time of the model implementation by theprofessors of the discipline, primarily in the competence of the conceive, design, implement,operate cycle. It is then assumed that a faculty member is expected to demonstrate her or his ability in the competencies proposed by the model. Specifically, CDIO Standards 9 and 10 address the issue of faculty training for the development of these competencies.[4]. With this in mind, the current research seeks to answer the question, do the faculties of engineering schools need to improve and update their knowledge, skills and attitudes in order to demonstrate their ability to guarantee the learning process of students under the requirements of engineering education standards such as CDIO or ABET
Conference Session
Pre-college Engineering Education Division Technical Session 10
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Christina Anlynette Alston, Rice University; Carolyn Nichol, Rice University; Robert Wimpelberg, University of Houston; Jean S. Larson, Arizona State University; Alison Cook-Davis, Arizona State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Pre-College Engineering Education
relevance of those ideas, and ● The number of relevant ideas used providing accommodating feedback to (mind map, outline teams of students. Idea generation will prepare students for the next phase of the engineering design cycle. ● The ratio of student-generated vs. teacher-generated potential The teacher will facilitate classroom consequences compared to the BOY. activities that account for the social and ● Percent of positive and percent
Collection
2020 First-Year Engineering Experience
Authors
Ludvik Alkhoury, New Jersey Institute of Technology; Jaskirat Sodhi, New Jersey Institute of Technology; Ashish D Borgaonkar, New Jersey Institute of Technology
shipwreck, inspect offshore rigs, and underwater pipelines etc. [4]As drones become an integral part of our daily lives, it becomes important for engineers to learnabout their operation, design, and applications. Keeping this in mind, a design project isdeveloped to integrate drones into the curriculum of first-year design course. This paper furtherelaborates on the activities performed to implement this idea, as well as the authors’ efforts inindulging the students’ interest into the topic and thus, in the process giving a hands-onexperience in reverse-engineering, assembling, and redesigning a mini drone in a first-yearengineering design class. The authors believe that this is an engaging activity to introduce theconcepts of engineering design to
Conference Session
Mechanical Engineering Division Poster Session
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Kathleen E. Cook, Seattle University; Yen-Lin Han, Seattle University; Teodora Rutar Shuman, Seattle University; Gregory Mason P.E., Seattle University; Jennifer A. Turns, University of Washington
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Mechanical Engineering
Paper ID #22168Work-in-Progress: Engineering Identity across the Mechanical EngineeringMajorDr. Kathleen E. Cook, Seattle University Kathleen Cook, Ph.D. is an Associate Professor in the Psychology Department at Seattle University. Dr. Cook received her doctorate in Social and Personality Psychology from the University of Washington, with a minor in quantitative methods and emphases in cognitive and educational psychology. Her research has included classroom learning, person perception, health perceptions, and jury decision making.Dr. Yen-Lin Han, Seattle University Yen-Lin Han is an Assistant Professor in the department
Conference Session
Reaching Students: Innovations to Curriculum in ET
Collection
2008 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Sangram Redkar, Arizona State University; Scott Danielson, Arizona State University; Bradley Rogers, Arizona State University; Trian Georgeou, Arizona State University
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Technology
the courses. Eight general topical areas were suggested and rated on aqualitative importance scale of high (H), medium (M), or low (L). Credits were assigned afterthe importance rankings were made. As mentioned earlier, due to the existing curriculumstructure, that the automotive concentration would be 18 credits.While there was significant debate about the number of credits in each course, Table 1 belowrecords the conclusion of the voting and discussion. Points were assigned to each priority vote,with a ‘L’ earning one point, a ‘M’ earning two points and a ‘H’ earning three points. The ratingreflects the importance of an automotive concentration topic treatment in the minds of theindustry representatives (all engineers). It is observed that
Conference Session
The Role of Engineering in Public Policy
Collection
2009 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Bruce Harding, Purdue University; Paul McPherson, Purdue University
Tagged Divisions
Engineering and Public Policy
AC 2009-1168: INCORPORATING STANDARDS INTO ENGINEERING ANDENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY CURRICULA: IT'S A MATTER OF PUBLICPOLICYBruce Harding, Purdue University Bruce A. Harding is a Professor at Purdue and an ASEE Fellow whose scholarship and engagement activities revolve around the development and application of American National and ISO standards dealing with Technical Product Documentation (TPD) as it broadly relates to product realization and other technical aspects of Product Lifecycle Management (PLM). He is a member of the board of directors of ANSI, the vice-chair of the ASME Board on Standardization and Testing and chairs the 62-country ISO worldwide standards committee on technical product
Conference Session
Manufacturing Education Innovation and Assessment
Collection
2006 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Priya Manohar, Robert Morris University
Tagged Divisions
Manufacturing
tomanufacturing engineers is complex due to the subject matter that spawns acrossdisciplines of physics, chemistry, mathematics and manufacturing engineering. As one Page 11.193.9endeavors to expose the students to the mind-boggling array of conventional and modernmaterials at atomic levels to bulk structural levels, their intrinsic and extrinsic properties,their eco-economic impact, etc., it becomes a juggling act to give justice to the multi-dimensional aspects of materials education. In addition, the expectations of the variousstakeholders in the teaching – learning transaction are different and it is necessary toaddress their needs. Simultaneously, it is
Conference Session
Knowing Our Students I
Collection
2006 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Eugene Rutz, University of Cincinnati; Virginia Westheider, University of Cincinnati
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
across the learning cycle.Because of the more balanced profile of the engineering technology students, this population isexpected to have a greater awareness of and appreciation for diversity in approaches to learningand problem solving. One implication is that a team of engineering technology students workingon a project is more likely than a team of engineering students to identify multiple approaches toa task or problem. Given the profile of the engineering students, they are more likely to be like-minded in problem solving and learning. There is a growing body of literature (see for exampleLeonard and Strauss14) that suggests organizations benefit when individuals are comfortable andcompetent at working with diversity in problem solving
Conference Session
ETD Freshmen Students
Collection
2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Hossein Rahemi, Vaughn College of Aeronautics and Technology; Shouling He, Vaughn College of Aeronautics and Technology; Margaret Ducharme, Vaughn College of Aeronautics and Technology
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Technology
& analysis,technical writing and presentation. The Friday session of the SEE program was designated fortechnical seminars and workshops designed to enhance students’ learning outcomes related tocritical thinking, problem solving, and life-long learning. Guest speakers from the industry wereinvited to deliver lectures and host workshops current with today’s technology. Given the rapidpace of technological change, the Friday seminar series and workshops were designed to fosterin Vaughn’s engineering students a mind-set receptive to changes in technology in order toprepare them for their future professional careers.During the last two weeks of the program, students were arranged into two to three persongroups to work with a SEE faculty mentor
Conference Session
International Division Technical Session 2
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Anna Friesel, Technical University-Copenhagen; Phillip Albert Sanger, Purdue University
Tagged Divisions
International
working alongside colleagues of different nationalities.I believe that if there was one aspect of the course I would improve, it would be to establish strongstandards and expectations of the group members at the beginning of the project. It is a commonphilosophy among management courses, that conflicts occur in the beginning of the formation of ateam as members stumble around to find their niche and challenge each other’s knowledge andauthority. However, it is important to understand that conflict is normal and necessary to create aninnovative group of engineers. On the contrary, keeping in mind that each person has a differentpersonality type, responds to stress and conflict differently, and perceives and communicates ideasin their own way. A
Conference Session
Military and Veterans Division Technical Session 2
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Reza Rahdar, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University; Ghazal Barari, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University; Yuetong Lin, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University; Ryan Goyings, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University
Tagged Divisions
Military and Veterans
Paper ID #30666A Systems Engineering Approach to Mentorship Program for Online Mili-taryand Veteran Engineering StudentsDr. Reza Rahdar, Embry Riddle Aeronautical University Dr. Reza Rahdar, currently a full time faculty of the College of Aeronautics, have over 25 years of expe- rience in systems design/development, and engineering systems that include telecommunication systems and networks, Radio communications, air defenses systems, avionics systems, and Airborne Warning and Control System (AWACS). Dr. Rahdar developed proficiency with systems engineering principles, pro- cess, and practices. He is an expert in taking
Conference Session
Middle School Engineering Education
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Emilie A. Siverling, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Tamara J. Moore, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Siddika Selcen Guzey, Purdue University, West Lafayette
Tagged Divisions
Pre-College Engineering Education
standards were based, includes obtaining, evaluating, andcommunicating information as one of the eight science and engineering practices [3]. Anothercomprehensive report relating to pre-college engineering education, Engineering in K-12Education, lists communication of one of the six key engineering “habits of mind” [4]. Authors[5] also support communication as an important facet of pre-college engineering education. Ofthe nine indicators in the Framework for Quality K-12 Engineering Education, communicationrelated to engineering was found to be one of the five indicators essential to adequate quality ofan engineering education curriculum, partially because it is needed to help students develop theirunderstanding of engineering. Communication in
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session I
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Brian E Faulkner, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Geoffrey L Herman, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
Tagged Topics
NSF Grantees Poster Session
has been paid to the habits of mindand attitudes towards mathematics that engineering faculty wish their students to develop. Whilewe know that mature epistemologies and symbol sense are expert-like behaviors, we don’t knowif faculty are implicitly referring to these habits of mind when they discuss “mathematicalmaturity.” Furthermore, we don’t know if the calculus sequence is engendering matureepistemologies or symbol sense in engineering students. There may be a fundamental mismatchbetween what mathematics instructors want students to leave their courses with and whatengineering instructors expect students to enter their courses with are well documented 9.Our preliminary discussions with faculty indicated that mathematical maturity, not
Conference Session
First Year Programs Division Poster Session: The Best Place to Really Talk about First-Year Education
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Victoria E Goodrich, University of Notre Dame; Leo H McWilliams, University of Notre Dame; Catherine F Pieronek, University of Notre Dame
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
isgenerally most prevalent in early semesters.6 Therefore, first-year programs are ideally situatedto aid students in building these interactive support networks. With these findings in mind,Notre Dame sought to create an educational experience within the first-year course that wouldencourage students to explore the extracurricular activities available to them within theuniversity. By making students academically responsible for attendance at extracurricularevents, the course staff sought to increase the chance that students would find encouragementand community early in their academic careers while learning more about the engineering majorchoice. More explicitly, the goals of these Engineering Exploration assignments were to helpstudents: 1
Conference Session
Mathematics Division Technical Session 1
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Lynn Albers, Campbell University
Tagged Divisions
Mathematics
Paper ID #23669Implementing the Wright State Model First-Year Engineering MathematicsCourse in a Startup School of EngineeringDr. Lynn A Albers, Campbell University Dr. Lynn Albers is an Assistant Professor in the newly formed School of Engineering at Campbell Uni- versity. A proponent of Hands-On Activities in the classroom and during out-of-school time programs, she believes that they complement any teaching style thereby reaching all learning styles. She earned her doctorate in Mechanical Engineering from North Carolina State University specializing in thermal sci- ences where her dissertation research spanned three
Conference Session
Pre-College Engineering Education Division Poster Session
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Kelli Paul, Indiana University; Euisuk Sung, Indiana University; Adam V. Maltese, Indiana University; Karen Miel, Tufts University; Merredith D. Portsmore, Tufts University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Pre-College Engineering Education
Paper ID #26311Board 121: Development of a Create-a-Lego-Engineer Activity to ExamineStudents’ Engineering IdentityDr. Kelli Paul, Indiana University Dr. Kelli Paul is a postdoctoral researcher in science education at Indiana University. She received her Ph.D. in Educational Psychology specializing in Inquiry Methodology from Indiana University in 2006. She managed a consulting business for 10 years working on evaluations that focused primarily in the areas of education and STEM for middle and high school students, especially women and minority students. Her research interests include student engagement and interest in STEM
Conference Session
PSW Section Meeting Papers - Disregard start and end time - for online paper access only
Collection
2019 Pacific Southwest Section Meeting
Authors
Amy Huynh, University of California, Irvine; Natascha Trellinger Buswell, University of California, Irvine
Tagged Topics
Diversity, Pacific Southwest Section Meeting Paper Submissions
Paper ID #27821How was your internship? Stories about the engineering internship experi-ence from five female engineering studentsAmy Huynh, University of California, Irvine Amy Huynh is a mechanical and aerospace engineering major at the University of California, Irvine. She is interested in better understanding and supporting the experiences of female engineers in the classroom and in industry. She is involved in senior design projects for the CanSat and Design/Build/Fly competi- tions.Prof. Natascha Trellinger Buswell, University of California, Irvine Natascha Trellinger Buswell is an assistant professor of teaching in