Engineering Education Table 1: Numerical SummaryCore Courses in the Biomedical Entrepreneurship Program Course InstructorSemester Number Credits Title Evaluation(s) Evaluation(s)Summer (1) IIME 400 3 Professional Development 3.8 3.8Summer (1) IIME 405 3 Project Management 3.8, 4.1 4.0, 4.4Summer (1) IIME 410 3 Accounting, Finance and Engineering Economics* 2.4, 4.5 2.2, 4.8Summer (1) IIME 415
receive information indirectly.3) This is an example of a pause in conversation.4) Three members of the group are conversing together in rapid succession or simultaneously such that it is not clear who controls the flow of communication.5) One mentor and the faculty member speak simultaneously to one of the undergraduate students.6) Two separate conversations occur simultaneously dividing the grouping in two.Table 1 depicts the coding of a session. The events are numbered chronologically and markedby their start times. The type of each event is noted. Initials are used to indicate the speaker(s)and the recipient(s) (audience). Each event is then further classified, based on the form ofcommunication being employed
Session 2426 MAPPING OF THERMO-FLUIDS LABORATORY EXPERIMENTS INTO WEB-BASED EXPERIMENTS S. K. Chaturvedi, R. McKenzie, O. A. Akan and A. Priyadershini College of Engineering and Technology Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA 23529Abstract A methodology is being developed for transforming physical experiments from theundergraduate thermo-fluids laboratory into a web-based virtual experiments. Importantcharacteristics of physical experiments are identified in order to preserve them in physical tovirtual domain mapping. Several commercially available
. Vocational Education Journal, 67(5), 24-25, 47.2. Alexander, M. W. and Stone S. F. (1997, February). Student perceptions of teamwork in the classroom: An analysis by gender. Business Education Forum, 51(3), 7-10.3. Kunkel, J. G. and Shafer, W. E. (1997). Effects of student team learning in undergraduate auditing courses. Journal of Education for Business, 72(4), 197-200.4. Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET). (2002), Criteria for accrediting Engineering programs. ABET:MD5. Ravenscroft, S. P. and Buclkess, F. A. (1995). Incentives in student team learning: An experiment in cooperative group learning. Issues in Accounting Education, 10(1), 97-110.6. Richardson, J., Montemuro, M., Mohide, E
experience helpedthem to understand better the meaning of being a real team member and what a real teammeans. They mentioned that the training experience will help them in future teamsituation either in their academic programs or in the work place.References1. Alexander, M. W. and Stone S. F. (1997, February). Student perceptions of teamwork in the classroom: An analysis by gender. Business Education Forum, 51(3), 7-10.2. McFarland, W. P. (1992, May). Meeting of the Minds: Recognizing Styles of Conflict Management Helps Students develop ‘People Skills’. Vocational education Journal, 67(5), 26-273. Overtoom, Ch. (2000). Employability skills: An update. ERIC Digest No. 220. (Report No. EDO-CE- 00-220). U.S.: Ohio
into manageable pieces, making and justifying appropriate assumptions and designdecisions, and making judgments as to the reasonableness of a finished design.In the following sections of this paper, several problems are included from the first offering ofthis course (Fall 2003), from homework assignments, laboratory exercises and exam questions.Then the discussion and conclusions section describes overall student performance on theseexercises and includes suggestions for incorporation into courses designed for non-sciencemajors.Homework ExercisesAssignments typically included one open-ended design problem which was to be done as a teamwith their lab partner(s) along with a set of textbook exercises targeting the lower levels ofBloom. The open
turn the construction industry green? Building andEnvironment 37, 2002, pp 421-428. Pergamon Press.5. Barcala, M., Ahmed, S.M., Caballero, A. and Azhar, S. 2003. The 4D-CAD: a powerful tool to visualize thefuture. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Structural and Construction Engineering, 23-26September, 2003, Rome, Italy. Vol. 3, pp. 1979-1982.6. Berglund, A., Mats, D., Hedenborg, M., and Tengstrand, A. 1998. Assessment to increase students’creativity: Two case studies. European Journal of Engineering Education, March 1998. Vol. 23. Issue 1 pp. 45- Page 9.1146.855. Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for
underrepresented transfer students. In Year 2, the activities on the MCCDcampuses will be refined. As the students transition to Fulton, an improved bridge program and aone-hour required academic success class will be held along with additional retention activities. Table 1. Challenges, Accomplishments, Future Needs by Institution ACADEMIC CHALLENGE(S) ACCOMPLISHMENT(S) FUTURE NEED(S) INSTITUTION Promoting and Held 3 independent “Be an Create a regular schedule so Community holding METS Engineer” events at GCC, students, faculty, and staff College events to interest CGCC, & EMC
organizational design subsystems.9Macroergonomics can be used to improve an organization in various ways. For example, L.L.Bean used the macroergonomics approach and methodology to introduce total qualitymanagement in the company.9 The company reduces lost-time accidents and injuries, increasesemployee satisfaction, and improves quality measures. 9 For CGEP, part of the macroergonomicanalysis and design (MEAD) framework, a framework to help improve work systems, is used toanalyze and design CGEP processes. The ten phases of MEAD framework are shown in Table 1. Table 1: Ten phases of macroergonomic analysis and design (MEAD) framework.9Phase Subsystem (s)1. Scanning analysis
Session 1455 Enabling the U.S. Engineering Workforce to Perform: Building a Culture for Technological Innovation and Leadership in Professional Graduate Engineering Education D. A. Keating,1 T. G. Stanford, 1 J. M. Snellenberger,2 D. H. Quick,2 I. T. Davis,3 J. P. Tidwell,4 D. R. Depew,5 A. L. McHenry,6 S. J. Tricamo,7 D. D. Dunlap,8 University of South Carolina 1 / Rolls-Royce Corporation 2 / Raytheon Missile Systems 3 The Boeing Company 4/Purdue University 5 / Arizona State University East 6 New Jersey
Half of the distance between plates (m)L Length of pipe (m)R0 Radius of pipe (m)R1 Radius of imaginary pipe (m)T Time (s)T0 Temperature of bottom plate or wall of pipe (K)T1 Temperature of top plate or center of pipe (K)U Velocity along x-axis (m/s)U1 Velocity of top plate (m/s)U2 Velocity of bottom plate (m/s)Greek letterso
, but the students really getexcited about the possibility of winning a competition against a rival school.The university and community colleges are hosting several different types of competitions inwhich the clubs may participate: 1. Robotics 2. Bridge building 3. Trebuchet building 4. Math and science tests (JETS’ TEAM+S) 5. Writing and public speaking Page 9.474.4 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering EducationThere are several objectives in the competitions. We
co-op. The résumé writing workshop isparticularly helpful to students who have never written a résumé. Table 1 also lists the variousworkshops that are planned for the students each year. Table 1: Seminar and Workshop Series3 (2003-2004) Topic Speaker(s)/Department Seminars Program Intro – Pizza Party Amy Monte & Gretchen Hein Master’s International Introduction Graduate Mentors What to Expect as a First Year Student Undergraduate Mentors The Pros and Cons of Working in Industry Mary Fran Desrochers, Mechanical
organization from department heads and the Office(s) of theDean. In this realm Williams offers additional insight on needed engineering education reform;revised understanding of engineering education, the convergence of technological and liberal artseducation, and perspectives on curriculum change.17Business-as-usual collaboration in the university will not occur quickly for it narrows the differ-ences between the fields of engineering and other domains. However, the dramatic and rapid in-ternational outsourcing of white-collar jobs18 suggests that traditionally slow-to-change profes-sorate and university systems must quicken the rate of change or risk obsolescence. Change ispossible with strong leadership, by starting with trial college-wide capstone
is true then execute statement1(s) statement1(s) if condition is false then execute statement2(s) { ELSE statement2(s) } ENDIF FOR Counter = StartValue TO set variable Counter to the value StartValue initially, execute statements, and then EndValue {STEP StepValue} increment Counter by StepValue (1 if StepValue not used), repeat this loop again statement(s) and again until Counter exceeds EndValue NEXT Table II. Selected BS2 Instruction Set Command Reference. Page 9.96.5 Proceedings of the
Petroleum Design, iscelebrating a decade of existence. The idea for the course originally came from amultidisciplinary team research project undertaken by CSM faculty for the United StatesDepartment of Energy.2 This project realized an incremental benefit of $20 million discounted at10% and showed the power of a multidisciplinary approach. The results of this project alsoendorsed calls in the early 1990’s that suggested engineering curricula needed to be improved inthe area of engineering design and teamwork processes.6 When the requirements of ABET weremodified to include capstone design courses, CSM felt strongly that programs of this kind wouldbenefit its graduates and make them more valuable to future employers. In addition to
A Pr oposal for Unifying some of the Fundamental Concepts of Engineer ing Gr egor y S. Mowr y Engineer ing Depar tment, Univer sity of St. ThomasAbstractMathematics is the descriptive language of engineering while physics provides the foundation forengineering. At many engineering institutions, mathematics and physics are frequently taught bydepartments other than the engineering department. This tradition often has the result thatundergraduate students experience considerable difficulty in applying their mathematics skills inphysics and engineering. Additionally, students infrequently learn the relevance and significanceof several
of working on a problem has directed the attention to the 'managementof meaning' and thus the role of the consultant intervening in the act of deliberation."Furthermore, as well as the abilities to deal with these types of situations, students need to learnthe underlying issues so that they can make conscious choices about their style of practicing theprofession. As one example, Eden and Sims (1996) describe three paradigms that a consultantmay adhere to in order to affect the actions of the client: (s)he may attempt to coerce the clientinto using models and solutions devised by the consultant; (s)he may attempt to develop empathywith the client, discover the definition of the problem and help the client to devise a satisfactorycourse of
work with others in a more productive way.3. Developing detailed design specifications using the Quality Function Development(QFD) method Ullman [2003] popularized the QFD method in US engineering schools in his well adopted book The Mechanical Design Process. This method is important for turning vague, not measurable customer needs for a new design into a set of measurable engineering specifications. Although this method was proposed in Japan in the mid-70's, it is still not well known or popular in Asian engineering schools. Experienced design engineers can design well without explicitly using this method, however, it is very helpful to learn this concept in teaching and learning the design process. Figure 2 is a very good
‚ [s ? / l ] from Figure 4. Hence, the change [sin s ] = [cos l ] from (1) to (2) 2 kl rl rl 2 ‚ u ? cos s ? cos s ? sin l ; and | ? z (a dummy variable) 2 n n l l l 1 jk| sin l ‚ In equation (1) U(s) is replaced by U (l ) ? Ð I (| )e 2 d| 2 /1 jkje / jkr l 1 ‚ Substituting, we attain: E ? [cos l ] Ð I (| )e ju| d| where
free stream turbulence. o Hot air Ta( C)= 22.5 T ra n s ie n t te s t, S te e l S p h e re o o t(sec) Tcenter( C) Tsurface( C) 33 0 0 22.5 22.5 32 5 10 24.3 24.7 20 26.6 27.1 32 0 30 28.7 29.0 40 30.1 30.2 31 5 60 33.4 33.5 T e s t d ata T(K) 31 0
of the first stage of desorption (s)h = Depth of defect (m) Page 9.633.6D = Diffusion coefficient of gas penetrant in air (m2/s). Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering EducationThe mathematical model of the diffusion flux density (I) during this stage is complex and of littlepractical use.During the second stage of desorption, on the other hand, the diffussion flux density (I) can bedescribed more explicitly in terms of parameters that are known to be inherent to the phenomenaof absorption and
mass transfer fundamentalswithin specific fuel cell components to improve their performance. These projects willinvolve both graduate students and the AFE enterprise. In addition, assessment of theAFE enterprise is currently underway and will be reported at a future ASEE conference.AcknowledgmentsThe author would like to thank the United States Army Tank Automotive and ArmamentsCommand (TACOM) and the Michigan Economic Development Corporation for projectfunding.Bibliography 1. J. M. Keith, C. Dugar, J. Meyer, and N. Norman, “A Hands-On Multidisciplinary Design Course for Chemical Engineering Students,” ASEE Conference Proceedings (2001). 2. J. M. Keith, “Learning Outside the Toybox,” ASEE Conference Proceedings (2002). 3. S
. These circuit components are introduced early in thestudent s academic career, but usually only as ideal circuit elements. Concepts such as resistive1 Now with Lockheed Martin Corp., King of Prussia, PA. Page 9.811.12 Now with Raytheon Corp., Chelmsford, MA
of Gains for Female Faculty?" Teachers College Record, 93, 697-709.5. P. Bronstein, E. Rothblum & S. Solomon. (1993). "Ivy Halls and Glass Walls: Barriers to Academic Careers for Women and Ethnic Minorities" in J. Gainen and R. Boice (eds.) New Directions for Teaching and Research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.6. J. Buck. (2001). “The President’s Report” Academe, September-October, 18-20.7. D.E. Chubin & E. Hackett. (1990). Peerless Science: Peer Review and US Science Policy. Albany: State University of New York at Albany Press.8. R.T.D. De George. (1997). Academic Freedom and Tenure: Ethical Issues. New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.9. J. Dewey. (1902). “Academic Freedom
Big Picture Guy – Interview with Broadcom, Inc., Co-founder Henry Samueli”, Prism, American Society for Engineering Education, April 2001, pp. 16-21Carryer, J. E. (2000) “March Madness: a Mechatronics Project Theme”, Mechatronics 2000 – 7th Mechatronics Forum International Conference, September 6-8, 2000, Atlanta, GA, CD-ROMCraig, K. (2000) “Inverted Pendulum Systems: Rotary and Arm-Driven – a Mechatronics System Design Case Study”, Mechatronics 2000 – 7th Mechatronics Forum International Conference, September 6-8, 2000, Atlanta, GA, CD-ROMField, S.; Meek, S.; Devasia, S. (2000) “Mechatronics Education in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Utah”, Mechatronics 2000 – 7th Mechatronics Forum
made and parameters are established. In our situation, this happened at thedepartment level with department chairs establishing boundaries, and at the college level wherethe steering committee and associate dean made decisions and sorted through requests. Further,connecting the faculty developing the metrics with the college technical support with regularmeetings, allowed ideas to be floated, technical possibilities explored, and realities of cost,availability, institute data supply issues, and technical capability to be addressed.All this is easier ‘said than done.’ There is an inherent, traditional culture at work in academia.The 1990’s saw many attempts to implement Total Quality Management (TQM) in highereducation with many failures. TQM
? - È y% Ù È sin cos ÙÚ ÈÉ v ÙÚ ÈÉ Vc sin c ÙÚ (1) É Ú É %?rwhere x, y, and s""are the planar position and rotation variables in the world or inertialframe of reference and u, v, and r are the surge velocity, sway velocity and yaw rate withrespect to a reference frame attached to the USAV.In Equation (1) Vc and sc represent the ocean current magnitude and direction. The oceancurrent directly modifies the velocities in the inertial frame as evidenced from Equation(1).Exact dynamics of marine vessels becomes extremely complicated if all the added inertiaand first and higher order
during an interval of time is a = -2v m/s2. When t = 0,its position is s = 0 and its velocity is v = 2 m/s. Determine the router’s velocity as afunction of time.2. Engineers analyzing the motion of a linkage determine that the velocity of anattachment point is given by v = A + 4s2 ft/s, where A is constant. When s = 2 ft, itsacceleration is measured and determined to be a = 320 ft/s2. What is its velocity whens = 2 ft?Because of the nature of the class, the post-test was a typical end-of-chapter textbookproblem. Unlike the pretest, students were required not only to use relevant equations,but also to apply them correctly in solving the problem. Thus success on the post-testindicates a higher degree of skill and understanding than did success on
] Courter, S. S.; Millar, S. B.; Syons, L.; From the students’ point of view: Experiences in a freshman engineering design course, Journal of Engineering Education, v87, n 3, p 283 – 287, Jul 1998.[2] Parcover, J. A., McCuen, R. H., Discovery Approach to Teaching Engineering Design, Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, p 236-241, Oct 1995.[3] Richardson, Jim; Dantzler, John, Effect of a freshman engineering program on retention and academic performance, 32nd Annual Frontiers in Education, v 3, p S2C/16-S2C/22, Nov 6-9 2002, Boston, MA, United States.[4] Piket-May, M.; Avery, J.; Service learning first year design retention results, 31st Annual Frontiers in Education, v 2, p F3C/19-F3C/22, 2001, Reno