) education:integrating diversity, equity, inclusion, and justice (DEIJ) principles to counter systemic racismwhen teaching the infrastructure lifecycle. The research team piloted the Group ConceptMapping (GCM) methodology to identify and prioritize actionable strategies that can guide theeducation of future engineers in addressing racial inequities in infrastructure projects. Thefindings from this pilot study demonstrate that GCM is feasible, and valuable results are likely tobe obtained from a more extensive study. A total of 15 participants contributed to GCM activitiesin this pilot study. Forty statements generated by the participants were clustered and rated by theparticipants to create concept maps to understand the importance, implementation feasibility
. Amelink is the Director of Graduate Programs and Assessment in the College of Engineering Virginia Page 26.506.1 Tech and affiliate faculty in the Department of Engineering Education and the Department of Educational Leadership and Policy Studies at Virginia Tech. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Developing the Postsecondary Student Engagement Survey (PosSES) to Measure Undergraduate Engineering Students’ Out-of-Class Involvement Abstract A large body of literature focuses on the importance of student involvement in all aspects ofcollege for achieving
in Choice of Careers in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics,” Psychol. Sci., vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 770–775, 2013.[10] B. L. Oo, S. Li, and L. Zhang, “Understanding Female Students ’ Choice of a Construction Management Undergraduate Degree Program : Case Study at an Australian University,” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., vol. 144, no. 3, pp. 1–8, 2018.[11] J. W. Elliott, M. K. Thevenin, and C. Lopez del Puerto, “Role of Gender and Industry Experience in Construction Management Student Self-efficacy, Motivation, and Planned Behavior,” Int. J. Constr. Educ. Res., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 3–17, 2016.[12] R. Su and J. Rounds, “All STEM fields are not created equal: People and things interests explain
participation of girls and students from racially underrepresented communities in engineering? • How do engineering educators and the U.S public perceive and interpret new information about the history of discrimination in STEM fields?My findings indicate that the film had a tremendous impact on Black women in STEM, but also White women andother women of color by providing much needed visual models of success in STEM professions. I begin my paperwith a review of some of the research literature to set up the context of my study, after which I explain my uniquemethodological framework and research design. In the last section, I discuss my analysis process and findings inmore detail. I end with the limitations and the future
as a professor oradvisor, doing activities and projects were influential in helping engineering students in majorselection [14]. Furthermore, professional development programs, such as internships, have beenshown as an effective approach to promote students’ awareness and intentions towards futurecareers [15]. Several of the elements of the internship – mentoring, research, and community-based projects – have shown to be predictors of continuing in STEM after graduation [16].MethodologyResearchers at the UNIVERSITY pilot site began with collection protocols from the originalpilot [10, 17, 18]; they modified them as needed in collaboration with UNIVERSITIES. Using adigital platform (Qualtrics), researchers at UNIVERSITY also coordinated and
Initiative Pilot Program structure and curriculum. The pilot program focuses onthe development of qualitative and quantitative methods of assessment. In addition, it aims to provide some limited evidence that theproposed methods are effective at improving students’ desire to be retained in the college of engineering until the completion of theirundergraduate level degrees. The pilot consists of two phases: the recruitment and training of potential mentors which was completedin the Fall of 2014 and the execution of a Robotics Summer Academy during the Summer of 2015. This paper outlines the programstructure for Bulls-EYE Mentoring and the logistics of the program’s curriculum. Potential mentors are selected and trained through partnerships
Paper ID #14811Dialogues Toward Gender Equity: Engaging Engineering Faculty to Promotean Inclusive Department ClimateJ. Kasi Jackson, West Virginia University Dr. J. Kasi Jackson is an Associate Professor of Women’s and Gender Studies at West Virginia University. Her research covers supporting women faculty in STEM, STEM education, gendered impacts on animal behavior research, and the representation of science in popular culture. She completed her PhD in biology, with a focus on animal behavior, and graduate certificate in women’s studies at the University of Kentucky. She is a Co-Investigator on a National Science
programs. By using a qualitative interview-based approach, our goal was tofurther refine and build upon findings from the quantitative Pathways I study. Quantitativestudies do not allow for the more in-depth, nuanced accounts of human behavior that are likelyaccessible through qualitative approaches.4 Furthermore, Pathways I relied on a data poolcomposed predominately of male students and did not involve questions specifically regardingthe experiences of women. Extending interviews to include engineers in their first eighteenmonths as full-time employees serves to gain valuable insights into if and how co-op experiencesimpacted their decision to remain in their respective undergraduate engineering programs.Interview questions for the pilot study
Paper ID #45289Revisiting Assessment Tools Used to Measure the Impact of Summer ProgramInterventions on Perceptions and Interest in Engineering Among UnderrepresentedPre-College Students – A Work in ProgressZeynep Ambarkutuk, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Zeynep Ambarkutuk is a doctoral student in the Educational Psychology program at Virginia Tech. Her research interests include motivation, motivation interventions, and the effect of identity and culture on motivation and learning.Jesika Monet McDaniel, Virginia Tech Department of Engineering Education Jesika is an accomplished graduate of Virginia Tech
identifies as a veteran Hispanic manstudying mechanical engineering. Both participants attend separate R-1 Hispanic ServingInstitutions (HSIs). Jakobe was interviewed in the pilot phase, and Alejandro was part of theongoing, full study. These similarities and differences provide deeper insights into how post-traditional students with their multiple social identities describe, interpret, and interact with theirrelationship with education systems.4. FindingsOne of the major goals of the project is to evoke faculty’s empathetic understanding byreading/listening to students’ overlooked or hidden experiences in engineering settings. In thespirit of the project, we fully present both Jakobe's and Alejandro’s constructed narratives andinvite readers to
conferred her Ph.D. in aerospace engineering from the University of Michigan - Ann Arbor in April 2021; her thesis included both technical and educational research. She also holds an M.S.E. in aerospace engineering from the University of Michigan - Ann Arbor and a B.S.E. in civil engineering from Case Western Reserve University, both in the areas of structural engineering and solid mechanics.Ms. Elizabeth Ann Strehl, University of Michigan Elizabeth is a graduate student at the University of Michigan studying Engineering Education Research under doctoral advisor Aaron Johnson. Her research focuses on weaving macro ethics into existing aerospace engineering curricula and institutional support methods for working class
Young University with other SA programs across campus.Description of College and Study Abroad ProgramBrigham Young University is a private, church sponsored university with approximately 33,000undergraduate and graduate students across 12 colleges within the university. The Ira A. FultonCollege of Engineering and Technology helps prepare more than 4,000 students in 10 degreeprograms. During the 2014-2015 academic year, 600 undergraduate students and 129 graduatestudents completed their degrees in the engineering and technology programs.In 2015, Brigham Young University sponsored 164 different international programs. Theseprograms sent 1,575 participants to 54 different countries and included students from most ofBYU’s 12 colleges. In 2015, the
and students of color.Ms. Sarah Jane (SJ) Bork, University of Michigan Sarah Jane (SJ) received her B.S. and M.S. in Electrical and Computer Engineering from the Ohio State University in 2017, and her M.S. in Engineering Education Research from the University of Michigan in 2020. As a doctoral candidate in Engineering Education Research at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Sarah is studying the mental health experiences of engineering graduate students.Kayleigh Merz, University of Michigan Kayleigh Merz (she/her) is a recent master’s graduate in Higher Education from the University of Michi- gan. She earned a B.S. in Cognitive Science from the University of Michigan, and associate degrees in Mathematics
created by group events and activities suchas annual retreat, peer mentoring, group studying, and Boot Camp in which students, peers, andfaculties interact actively and meaningfully. It is shown that LLC has a positive impact on retentionrate and academic success of STEM students [26]. Peer relationships and peer mentoring are ofgreat importance in building a STEM community. A study focused on STEM identity among agroup of S-STEM engineering scholars who were ‘at risk’ for dropping out of STEM due to unmetfinancial need showed that peer mentoring relationships and informal peer relationships plays animportant role in scholars’ journeys into becoming engineers. Peer mentoring relationships ledthem to feel connected to and recognized by other STEM
categories: pedagogy (motivated bysound pedagogical foundations), content (curricula), application (practical application ofcontent), representation (the way concepts are presented to students), social (interaction betweenstudents), technical cooperation (group or teamwork), metacognition, student agency (studentstaking charge of their learning; co-creation of knowledge), and administrative (resourcesprovided to students through school environment).This literature review also provides a mechanism in which to evaluate where our literaturereview can fill some gaps. Szabo mentions in their study that none of the quantitative papersreviewed included effect size, limiting their generalizability. With this in mind, the mosteffective categories were the
University, Justin’s dissertation research focuses on the study of Intersectionality Theory and the intersectionality of socioeconomic inequality in engineering education, use of critical quantitative methodology and narrative inquiry to understand the complex stories of engineering students from traditionally minoritized backgrounds, and the pursuit of a socioeconomically just engineering education.Mr. Matthew Scheidt, Purdue University at West Lafayette Matthew Scheidt is a Ph.D. student in Engineering Education at Purdue University. He graduated from Purdue University with a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering, The Ohio State University with a M.S. in Me- chanical Engineering with a focus in Ultrasonic Additive
study ofLatino/a adolescent students in that “students’ funds of knowledge should be the starting point forengineering education” [p. 14]. Second, funds of knowledge can help guide the people whosupport and mentor first-generation college students—from student service staff to professors—toidentify opportunities to help these students excel.AcknowledgmentsThis work was supported through funding by the National Science Foundation under EAGERGrant No. (1734044). Interview data of first-year engineering students came from fundingsupported by the National Science Foundation under CAREER Grant No. (1554057). Anyopinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of theauthor(s) and do not necessarily reflect
Paper ID #38410Illuminating Contexts that Influence Test Usage Beliefs and Behaviorsamong Instructors of Fundamental Engineering CoursesKai Jun Chew, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical UniversityDr. Holly M. Matusovich, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Dr. Holly Matusovich is the Associate Dean for Graduate and Professional Studies in the College of Engineering at Virginia Tech and a Professor in the Department of Engineering Education where she has also served in key leadership positions. Dr. Matusovich is recognized for her research and leadership related to graduate student mentoring and faculty development. She won
Learning. Previously, Stephanie received her B.S. and M.S. degrees in Neuroscience from the University of Miami, in addition to B.S. and M.S. degrees in Computer Science from FIU.Dr. Cristi L. Bell-Huff, Georgia Institute of Technology Cristi L. Bell-Huff, PhD is a Lecturer and Director of Faculty and Student Training in the Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering at Georgia Tech and Emory University. She is involved in teaching, engineering education innovation, and research. In addition to her PhD in Chemical Engineer- ing, she also has an MA in Educational Studies. She has industrial experience in pharmaceutical product and process development as well as teaching experience at the secondary and post
. In this paper, we draw upon the National Survey of Science and Mathematics Education, the High School Longitudinal Study of 2009, and the 2021 American Community Survey to underscore a lack of access to computer science learning contexts for students in these communities. We also explore how rural out-migration is compounding this challenge, and explore the roots of the rural out-migration trend. We then examine how multiple strains of research and scholarship identify rurality as either a place-based identification (i.e., where a student is from) or a distinct social identity. While convenient, geographic-based definitions lack important nuance in understanding rural populations and tend to emphasize
Paper ID #22387Characterizing Students’ Intercultural Competence Development Paths Througha Global Engineering ProgramMs. Kirsten Davis, Virginia Tech Kirsten Davis is a doctoral candidate in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she also completed her master’s degree in Higher Education. She is the graduate assistant for the Rising Sophomore Abroad Program, a global engineering course and study abroad program for first year engi- neering students. Her primary research interests are engineering study abroad, developing intercultural competency in engineering students, and international higher
, CU Boulder piloted a new, flexible design-based undergraduate engineeringdegree program described in this study.The General Engineering Plus (GE+) program facilitates significant curricular choice andcustomizability for students, allowing for a deep dive into both an engineering discipline andconcurrent study in a complementary subject. Comprehensive degree requirements include adesign-based engineering core with the choice of a “traditional” engineering emphasis —including mechanical, aerospace, civil, environmental, architectural or electrical engineering —coupled with a customizable concentration, such as secondary STEM teacher licensure,economics, environmental policy or a world language. Additionally, this degree integrates hands-on
department at Seattle University to study how the department culture changes can foster students’ engineering identity with the long-term goal of increasing the representation of women and minority in the field of engineering.Dr. Jennifer A Turns, University of Washington Dr. Jennifer Turns is a full professor in the Human Centered Design & Engineering Department in the College of Engineering at the University of Washington. Engineering education is her primary area of scholarship, and has been throughout her career. In her work, she currently focuses on the role of reflection in engineering student learning and the relationship of research and practice in engineering education. In recent years, she has been the co
Paper ID #43149Identifying Curriculum Factors that Facilitate Lifelong Learning in AlumniCareer Trajectories: Stage 3 of a Sequential Mixed-Methods StudyNikita Dawe, University of Toronto PhD student in the Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering at the University of Toronto, Collaborative Specialization in Engineering Education.Amy Bilton, University of TorontoMs. Lisa Romkey, University of Toronto Lisa Romkey serves as Associate Professor, Teaching and Associate Director, ISTEP (Institute for Studies in Transdisciplinary Engineering Education and Practice) at the University of Toronto. Her research focuses on
-origin.With regards to the term “immigrant parentage,” it is used to distinguish between participantsborn to two immigrant parents and those born to one or no immigrant parents; this distinction isrelevant as the findings of past research suggests that the former group (individuals born to twoimmigrant parents) may possess a unique academic advantage (Thomas, 2009).Study LimitationsHere, we address a few limitations to our study. First, we do not take into account time period ofenrollment and its impact on the experiences of Black engineering students with faculty. So, forexample, we do not explore emergent differences in the responses of Blacks who graduated withengineering degrees in the 1970s and those who graduated in the 2000s. Second, given the
highlights the Texas A&M Engineering Academies co-enrollment partnershipsbetween two-year institutions in the state of Texas and the Texas A&M University – CollegeStation College of Engineering (CoE). Students earn engineering course credits from the CoEbeginning with the first semester that they are admitted to the program. This unique co-enrollment model allows students to remain close to home, earning measurable progress towardscompleting a bachelor’s degree while simultaneously completing an associate’s degree.Programs are imbedded in the partnerships to help students develop an institutional andprofessional identity and adapt to the academic and social environment of Texas A&MUniversity. The US Census Bureau reported that as of 2011
). “A Quantitative Pilot Study of Engineering Graduate Student Identity,” in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, OH. https://peer.asee.org/27502Connors, R. (1998). The Rhetoric of Citation Systems, Part I: The Development of Annotation Structures from the Renaissance to 1900. Rhetoric Review, 17(1), 6-48.Connors, R. (1999). The Rhetoric of Citation Systems, Part II: Competing Epistemic Values in Citation. Rhetoric Review, 17(2), 219-245.Cooke, N. A. (2014). Pushing back from the table: Fighting to maintain my voice as a pre-tenure minority female in the white academy. Polymath: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Arts & Sciences, 4(2)Cressey, D. (2014). Journals weigh up double-blind peer review. Nature (London). https
1industry. Consequently, “… engineering colleges must develop strategies that provide globalperspectives and international experiences to help their graduates excel in their future workenvironment” [4].Study-abroad programs is one of the ways universities have found to provide a globalperspective to students. However, it has two limitations: low participation of engineeringstudents and effectiveness in providing global perspective. The low participation is because onlyfew students can afford to have a study-abroad experience. Despite the growing awareness of thebenefits of study-abroad by students, the challenges preventing students from studying abroadare numerous and complex [5]. A study by the Institute for International Education (IIE
Belonging. Milton: Taylor and Francis, 2018.[12] Shane, J., Lopez del Puerto, C., Strong, K., Mauro, K. M., Wiley-Jones, R., & Wiley, R. “Retaining Women Students in a Construction Engineering Undergraduate Program by Balancing Integration and Identity in Student Communities.” International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 8(3), 171–185, 2012.[13] Fielden, S. L., Davidson, M. J., Gale, A., & Davey, C. L. (2001). “Women, equality and construction.” Journal of Management Development, 20(4), 293–305, 2001.[14] Beede, D. N., Julian, T. A., Langdon, D., McKittrick, G., Khan, B., & Doms, M. E. “Women in stem: A gender gap to innovation.” Economics and Statistics Administration Issue Brief, 4(11), 2011
. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 How Faculty-Student Interactions Affect the BIPOC Design Student ExperienceAbstractAlthough there is a growing emphasis on decolonizing design curricula and integrating designjustice into engineering design, little research explores the lived experiences of BIPOC (Black,Indigenous, and People of Color) design students. In this pilot study, we conducted in-depthinterviews with 13 students from historically excluded backgrounds who were studying variousstudio-based design majors (architecture, interiors, and product design) at a public US university.Interviews covered a variety of topics and were designed to identify areas that might be worthyof further study