EthicsIntroductionIt is well accepted by both engineering education practitioners and researchers that developingethical engineers is critical for preparing engineering students to meet the obligations ofprofessional practice upon entering the workforce. Yet despite changing society contexts, and inan era where active changes are being seen in post-secondary engineering students (e.g., Sottileet al., 2021; Sottile, Cruz, & McLain, 2022) engineering ethics education largely looks the sameas it did a generation ago. This paper re-examines the question of engineering ethics educationwith an eye towards evaluating how students and faculty respond to relatively modernengineering ethical situations.Literature ReviewA Case for Case StudiesAs Martin, Conlon, and
to Foster Sustainable, Equitable, and Resilient Infrastructure ConceptsAbstractThis study aims to position active learning as a potential approach for teaching equitableresilience of infrastructure projects through online courses within construction curricula.Exposure to active learning methods can significantly enhance the problem-solving abilities ofconstruction management (CM) students, preparing them for complex technical challenges intheir future careers. Additionally, such interactive teaching strategies can help students retaininformation about advanced and practical concepts. However, in online learning environments,keeping students engaged poses a unique challenge. Unlike in-person classes
seminar seriesdeveloped to assist Ph.D. students and postdoctoral scholars with applying and interviewing foracademic positions. The seminar series, Seminar on Entering Academia (SEA), was offeredwithin the College of Engineering at the Pennsylvania State University to provide students withan opportunity for professional development to assist in their pursuit of faculty positions.Anecdotally, many Ph.D. students at this institution begin their careers with academia in mind.However, while the individual graduate programs in the college provide students with excellenttechnical training, Ph.D. students and postdocs receive little to no formal training on how toprepare for an academic position or how to approach the academic job market. This lack
were evaluated through surveys at the start, mid-pointand end of the program by an external program evaluator. Through these numerous surveys wedocumented student self-assessment of their change in knowledge and skills. After a year in theprogram most students (usually seven out of eight or eight out of eight) reported the programinfluenced their career area and their level of confidence pursuing a career area. Students as acohort dramatically increased their confidence in how to prepare an academic poster, participatein a professional meeting, plan a controlled experiment, engage in an effective mentoringrelationship, find an internship that matched their interests and explore graduate degrees thatinterest them. At the start of the program
Paper ID #44010Board 272: Examining the Catalysts and Barriers that Early-Career EngineersExperience to Their Adaptability at WorkDr. Samantha Ruth Brunhaver, Arizona State University, Polytechnic Campus Samantha Brunhaver, Ph.D. is an Associate Professor within The Polytechnic School of the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University. Her primary areas of research include engineering career pathways and decision-making, undergraduate student persistence, professional engineering practice, and faculty mentorship. Brunhaver is a mixed-methods researcher, utilizing both qualitative and quantitative
leadership and policy decision makers. NRT trainees and faculty visited with keylegislators and policy-making groups about water governance/water policy in Kansas. In spring2020, 2021, 2022, and 2023 NRT trainees met with legislatures and policy-making groups aboutwater governance and policy in Kansas. NRT trainees were prepared to this activity during NRTSeminar where they had an overview of the state legislature and received tips on how tocommunicate with the legislators.To explore different career pathways and to create a professional community, the NRTleadership team established a team-based faculty and peer mentoring to provide vocationalcounseling and career planning for NRT trainee to pursue industry, government, and academiapositions and
harvesting or planting times. Transportation to thefield sites and back was provided from the Kansas State University campus.To explore different career pathways, the NRT leadership team established a team-based facultyand peer mentoring model to provide vocational counseling and career planning for NRTstudents to pursue industry, government, and academia positions [9]. The interdisciplinary team-based faculty mentoring included development of Individual Development Plans (IDPs) withNRT students [10]. Each mentoring group had three faculty members from at least twodisciplines. The IDP included skills assessments, short-term and long-term career goals. As part © American Society for Engineering Education, 2024
personal computers or computers withstrong local computing power, who can now utilize any computer with internet access, such assystems at the public library, and be able to access their work or create their own projects.Giving students access to these tools and encouraging their use can promote confidence in theirskills through exploration of their features and industry relevant tools and applications that arehosted on the site.The AI section was taught completely in-person without members of the EQuIPD grant present,apart from one instructor attending the final section time virtually to watch and assist withpresentations of the chatbots. For this section, the camp organizers hired their own instructor,while curriculum was provided by the EQuIPD
Paper ID #42754Board 360: Reflections from Graduates on the Impact of Engineers WithoutBorders USA Experiences on Professional PreparationLazlo Stepback, Purdue University, West Lafayette Lazlo Stepback is a PhD student in Engineering Education at Purdue University. His current research interests focus on engineering ethics, the connections between personal morals and professional ethics, and how students ethically develop as engineers. He earned a B.S. in Chemical and Biochemical Engineering at the Colorado School of Mines (Golden, CO) in 2020.Paul A. Leidig P.E., Purdue University, West Lafayette Paul A. Leidig works in
developing an initial draft, we sought feedback from other members of our projectteam. Once we received their feedback we quickly shifted our approach to organizing thissurvey. In the following section we will discuss the major considerations that informed the nextversion of the survey. 6 4.2. Initial Draft Considerations The first consideration we made was question arrangement. Prior to the full round offeedback, we opened the survey with demographic questions that oriented respondents to thinkabout their role as faculty/staff within a graduate program interacting with graduate students. Wedecided to leave all remaining demographic
academic and/or social support for students from groups racially/ethnicallyminoritized in higher education (both STEM and non-STEM). These include ethnic/culturalcenters, instructional centers, programs supporting undergraduate research, and other academicsupport programs for minoritized students university-wide. Community 2 comprises advisingoffices for STEM disciplines outside the College of Engineering, student organizations forminoritized students in non-engineering STEM disciplines, and some general undergraduateacademic support/tutoring programs. The three organizations in Community 2 that are mostcentral/tightly connected to the larger network are an office serving graduate students fromminoritized groups, a tutoring center serving the
program improvement.Kristian Basaraba, University of Alberta Kristian Basaraba is currently an Instructional Coach for the SPARK-ENG (Scholarship of Pedagogy and Research Knowledge - Engineering) Program at the Faculty of Engineering at the University of Alberta. Throughout his 20+ years of teaching he has taught all levels of high school science in both a traditional and outreach setting. He earned his Master’s of Science in Science Education from Montana State University where he explored the role that computer simulations have on students’ conceptual understanding of classical physics. Kristian is very active in the professional development community and loves to share ideas and methodology for what happens in his
educational laboratories. ▪ Personalized Education o A satellite campus is typically unique in providing small-class sizes, a true collaborative learning environment, and an opportunity for personalized education for students. The class and campus environment creates an opportunity for faculty to engage in academic activities that can lead to developing professional relationships with students. The small class sizes allow the faculty to know their students on a more personal basis, which can lead to increasing the motivation of students. Meyer [12] conducted a literature review and survey and discovered that departments offering small class-sizes
contributed to the development of an interdisciplinary grand challenges focused course and introduction to engineering course in both in-person and online (MOOC) formats at ASU. She is also actively involved in the ASU Kern project and Kern Entrepreneurial Engineering Network (KEEN), focused on students’ development of entrepreneurial mindset. Amy received the national 2019 KEEN Rising Star award from KEEN for her efforts in encouraging students in developing an entrepreneurial mindset. She is also a member of the current interim Executive Committee for the international GCSP Network, and mentors schools to develop GCSPs as part of the GCSP New Programs committee.Dr. Haolin Zhu, Arizona State University Dr. Haolin Zhu
towards thehighest level of quality within research projects. This paper presents the approach of how auniversity team (professor and graduate students) collaborated with the National Society of BlackEngineers (NSBE) to conduct a longitudinal analysis of a summer engineering program fundedthrough an Early CAREER faculty award from the National Science Foundation’s EngineeringEducation Broadening Participation (BPE) program. According to the literature, there is a greatneed for longitudinal analysis of STEM outreach programs, especially informal ones, and supportstudents from historically excluded backgrounds. This paper contributes to the academia-non-profit partnership literature within the context of longitudinal studies by mapping out the
their own decisions or courses of action(i.e., where the stakes and tradeoffs are real to the learner). As one author describes it, theseapproaches “[allow] students to draw on their own experiences…to create a focal point andmeaning around abstract ethical concepts” [19, p. 1390].While the literature on experiential learning in engineering ethics has grown substantially inrecent years, extensions of this strategy into the realm of engineering leadership education iscomparatively rarer in published research. Our development of The Mystery Lab, therefore,leverages an opportunity to explore how the strengths of an experiential approach to ethicsinstruction can be applied not just to personal decision making, but to the collective behaviors
students tothe program. However, the program struggled with the historically high DFW rates in both theintroductory mechanical engineering course and Statics. Through a series of faculty meetings inAY 2018-2019, the program decided to emphasize the following two aspects in the introductorymechanical engineering course: 1) improving students’ interests in mechanical engineeringdiscipline and career, and 2) instructing foundational engineering principles to enhance students’success rate in Statics, a 2nd year course. Most students who pass Statics pass other 2nd yearcourses to enter the 3rd year.2.2 The Introductory Mechanical Engineering Course Contents in 2019 and 2020.Table 1 summarizes the course topics and the design project offered in-person
challenging but also presented lots of opportunities for personal growthand cross-cultural learning.This transition into an engineering education program involved immersing myself in the newly developedengineering education field. It was very different to what I had done as an engineer or what I had studiedin college. I had to attend very small classes, with a lot of discussions, in a foreign language. I facedseveral challenges as an international student, but they made me more resilient, I developedproblem-solving abilities and I learned to find different people for different types of mentorships andadvice I needed during that time.After completing my PhD in engineering education, I became a faculty member in a smaller engineeringeducation
-inspired) projects using photovoice. Photovoice is a participatoryaction research strategy, an ethnographic and experiential technique combining photography andimages, narrative and critical dialogue, and reflection to uncover social issues and promotechange [13], [14]. In return, that will enable students to share information and allowinterpretation processes at a deeper level.1.1 Problem IdentificationSustainability is a complex problem and a decision-oriented endeavor that requires the expertiseand integration of business, architecture, engineering, technology, community, policy, and law[15]. Subsequently, engineering curricula must cultivate an ability to recognize the importance ofdiverse knowledge to solve this emerging problem. In addition
practices that advantage white men over other social groups continue to persistwithin both academia and engineering [5]. Antiquated ideologies about who belongs inengineering education often persist among faculty and students [6], particularly within PWIsettings, which can result in students of color experiencing marginalization and isolation duringtheir undergraduate careers [7], [8], [9]. Consequently, these students are often retained in theengineering pipeline at disproportionately lower rates than their white peers [1], [10]. Thecontinued underrepresentation of Black and Brown individuals among engineering bachelor’sdegree recipients in the U.S. contributes to persistent equity gaps and racial homogenizationwithin the profession [11
implementation of the undergraduate Bachelor of Science in Data Science (BSDS) program at the Wentworth Institute of Technology. This new degree was developed by an interdisciplinary committee, including faculty members from computer science, humanities, management, mathematics, and sciences to underscore the importance of collaborative expertise in the field of Data Science. We will discuss the curricular development as well as our efforts required to successfully launch the new program. We will provide insights into the decision-making process for aligning the program with dynamic industry requirements. A focus point for this program lies in fostering diversity and inclusivity, with a keen aim to amplify the presence of
their technical field,and are pressed by the urgency of finding a qualified job right after graduation. Notwithstanding,students have been asking for a broader offer of elective courses from our department that canconnect them with job opportunities.Our aim is to reorient the education of our engineering students towards more aligned, valuable,and sustainable contributions to solutions to the increasingly complex problems that they areexpected to face in their professional careers. In the absence of a more general and concertedinstitutional approach, we have been exploring singular interventions fitting the curriculum andavoiding critical interference with major constraints like the ones highlighted above. Asmentioned above, opportunities so
leadership elective at theUniversity of Toronto: Systems Mapping for Complex Problems. The paper offers observationsfrom the first two offerings of the course based on student assignments and semi-structuredinterviews conducted with students, augmented by instructor reflections. Our goal is to motivatefurther exploration in connecting leadership and systems thinking in the context of engineeringprograms.Systems ThinkingDonella Meadows, an early leader in the systems thinking movement, defined a system as “a setof things interconnected in such a way that they produce their own pattern of behavior over time”[12]. Her work focused on sustainability; as the lead author on “Limits to Growth,” Meadowshad a deep appreciation for the complexity of
student (Micro-level) and the engineering culture from theprograms, departments, and institutions they are embedded in (Meso-level) but larger societalinfluences remain underexplored (Macro-level).Figure 2. Model of engineering thriving, from [6], which focuses on the Micro-level (individual)and Meso-level (organizations)In this research paper, we perform a systematized literature review to explore the distinctfunctioning of engineering thriving at the Micro, Meso, and Macro levels, as well asintersections of these levels, such as Micro-Meso, Micro-Macro, and Micro-Macro influences.We contribute to the current research shift from individual focus to systems-level focus inengineering education by viewing engineering thriving as an emergent
Excellence in Engineering Network at UNT advised by industry and academia. She is an alumni of Leadership Texas (Class of 2013).Hector R. Siller, University of North Texas Dr. Siller is Assistant Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the University of North Texas. He holds a Ph.D. degree in Technology Innovation from Jaume I University, Spain and holds a master and a bachelor’s degree from Monterrey Tech, Mexico, in the fields of Manufacturing and Mechanical Engineering, respectively. His research areas include advanced manufacturing processes, additive manufacturing, micro-manufacturing, and metrology. During his career he has advised more than 30 graduate students and has published around 60 research
Engineering Education at the University at Buffalo. She was the first doctoral student to get a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from the University of Cincinnati. She also has a Master’s degree in Aerospace Engineering from the University of Cincinnati and a Bachelor’s degree in Aerospace Engineering from SRM University, India. Her research areas of interest are graduate student professional development for a career in academia, preparing future faculty, and using AI tools to solve non-traditional problems in engineering education. She is currently also furthering work on the agency of engineering students through open-ended problems. She has published in several international conferences.Dr. P.K. Imbrie, University of
research study examined the following research questions about Blackengineering students at a specific predominantly White university in the United States: “(1) Whatare the retention rates in the Engineering College for Black students, and how are they changingover time?; (2) How do interventions and programs figure in their navigating the university andtheir major?; (3) What aspects of student experience are related to students’ decisions to stay orleave?”[1]. The other authors of this paper (Auguste and Hampton) were members of the five-person research team for that study. All members of the research team conducted semi-structuredinterviews with the 24 current or formerly-enrolled Black engineering student participants
Management. Diallo is a California State Credentialed Teacher in Career Technical Education (CTE) with experience in teaching aviation and engineering to high school and middle school youth.Prof. Tamara J Moore, Purdue University Tamara J. Moore, Ph.D., is a Professor in the School of Engineering Education, University Faculty Scholar, and Executive Co-Director of the INSPIRE Institute at Purdue University. Dr. Moore’s research is centered on the engineering design-based STEM integration in K-12 and postsecondary classrooms.Dr. Audeen W. Fentiman, Purdue University Audeen Fentiman is the Crowley Family Professor in Engineering Education at Purdue University.Dr. Morgan M Hynes, Purdue University Dr. Morgan Hynes is an
supportive team environment.Team-building activities and social events could be organized to foster camaraderie and trustamong team members. Lastly, since the extraversion personality appears as a variable,personality differences need to be considered in team compositions. When a team is lessdissatisfied and the dynamic is harmonious, the team functions better and has betterperformance. Therefore, faculty members and instructors can consider forming balanced andequitable teams through clustering algorithms after analyzing the students’ personalities andtraits [5], [6]. By recognizing and addressing these key factors, faculty members and instructorscan tailor their first-year engineering courses to better suit the varied needs of students,ultimately
, raised in a large city in Iran, withmultidisciplinary academic background in engineering and educational psychology. I graduatedwith a bachelor's degree in electrical engineering from a public university in Iran. My interest inpsychological foundations of education led me to pursue graduate degrees in educationalpsychology. Aligning with my educational experiences, my research interests are situated at theintersection of engineering, psychology, and education. I identify as a mother-scholar whosestudies are intentionally in a dynamic interaction with the lived experiences of mothering. Thegoal of my research is to understand mental experiences, relationships, and mental wellbeing ofunderrepresented students and faculty. I also explore how these