Paper ID #47384[Work in progress: Intersection of Design and ”X” Research Papers] Globalmeans local too: Integrating anti-oppressive practice into community-basedcapstone design projects.Ms. Kerry Eller, Duke University Kerry Eller is a 4th year PhD Candidate in the Center for Global Women’s Health Technologies at Duke University’s Biomedical Engineering Department. Kerry is working to develop cervical cancer screening technologies that are more accessible for both patients and providers but is also excited about engineering education and design pedagogy.Dr. Megan Madonna, Duke University Megan Madonna is an Assistant
engineering design and manufacturing, with special focus on engineering education within the mechanical engineering department. Her research focuses the impact of motivation on performance and persistence in mechanical engineering, design cognition and neurocognition, and manufacturing training in design courses. Elisabeth is an active member of ASEE, ASME, Tau Beta Pi, and Order of the Engineer. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Impact of Student Motivation and Confidence in a First-Year Hackathon ProjectAbstractUniversities are increasingly implementing design courses at the first-year level in Science,Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM
2006, and both his M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Mechanical Engineering from the University of California, Berkeley, in 2009 and 2011, respectively, with Doctoral Minors in Bioengineering and Public Health. Prof. Sochol’s postdoctoral training spanned the Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences & Technology, Harvard Medical School, Brigham & Women’s Hospital, the University of California, Berkeley, and the University of Tokyo. Prof. Sochol holds an affiliate appointment in the Fischell Department of Bioengineering and a Fischell Institute Fellow appointment with the Robert E. Fischell Institute for Biomedical Devices, and is an Executive Committee Member of the Maryland Robotics Center. Prof. Sochol received the
Paper ID #45790Introducing Sustainability in Pre-K through 5th Grade (RTP)Dr. Shannon L. Isovitsch Parks P.E., University of Pittsburgh at Johnstown Shannon L. Isovitsch Parks is an Associate Professor in the Civil Engineering Department at the University of Pittsburgh at Johnstown (UPJ), focused on teaching water resources and environmental engineering. Prior to joining UPJ in 2016, Dr. Parks worked for approximately 15 years in industry, including developing sustainable wastewater treatment and solid waste reuse technologies, serving on the Alcoa Foundation Board of Directors, and consulting for government agencies
, Chile. A National Researcher Level 2 (SNI-CONACYT), he has over 20 years of experience in educational research. His work spans conceptual understanding in physics, active learning, AI in education, and STEM interdisciplinarity. He leads initiatives on faculty development, competency assessment, and technology-enhanced learning. With 100+ publications, he integrates educational psychology, digital transformation, and sustainability. Dr. Zavala also pioneers projects using neuroscience tools and learning analytics to improve student engagement and foster innovative, student-centered learning environments. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Aligning Physics Education with
Education, 2025 Integration of Nearpod to Promote Active Learning in Undergraduate-level Thermodynamics CourseAbstractThis instructional initiative in the format of a full paper highlights compelling teaching techniqueswith the integration of a web-based technology tool, ‘Nearpod’, in undergraduate-level, non-coding, engineering course ‘Thermodynamics’. This course integrates engineering concepts withquantitative problem-solving techniques. This study prioritizes evaluating students' experienceswith Nearpod rather than analyzing its impact on academic grades.An active learning classroom is essential in creating a dynamic learning environment that infusesengagement and interaction, self-assessment and reflection
otherfactors that may increase self-efficacy and ultimately resiliency of the students in this programand beyond.IntroductionDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, engineering students faced significant academic challenges asuniversities transitioned quickly to remote learning. The abrupt shift disrupted hands-on labs,group projects, and practical experiences important to an engineering education and manyengineering courses [1, 2]. With the loss of access to physical lab spaces, equipment, and campusfacilities, instructors sought creative solutions for achieving course goals and ABET learningoutcomes remotely. Faculty and students had to learn to adapt to these new learning modes,tools, and technology quickly, which was challenging since few instructors or
T. W. Cawthon, "Generation Z Goes to College," College Student Affairs Journal, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 101-102, 2017.[2] G. Ivanova, V. Kozov, and P. Zlatarov, "Gamification in software engineering education," in 42nd International Convention Information Communication Technology Electronics Microelectronics, MIPRO 2019 Proceedings, pp. 1445-1450, 2019.[3] K. Kiili, H. Ketamo, and M. D. Kickmeirer-Rust, "Evaluating the Usefulness of Eye Tracking in Games-Based Learning," International Journal of Serious Games, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 51- 65, 2014.[4] N. McGrath and L. Bayerlein, "Engaging Online Students through the Gamification of Learning Materials: The Present and the Future," in 30th Annual Conference on Australian
Paper ID #49119BOARD #141: Work in Progress: Developing a Permanent Symposium onAI: an auto-ethnographyTammy Mackenzie, The Aula Fellowship EcoTech CEO, inventor, MBA, human rights activist, philosopher, and researcher of the intersections between strategic management, institutions, and systems theories.Mr. Animesh Paul, University of Georgia Animesh (he/they) is a Ph.D. student at the Engineering Education Transformation Institute at the University of Georgia. Their research explores user experience and the transition of engineering students into the workforce.Dr. Lilianny Virguez, University of Florida Dr. Virg
lecture, General Chemistry 1 & 2 lecture, recitations, and laboratory, Analytical Chemistry lecture and laboratory, Organic Chemistry laboratory, and Physical Chemistry Laboratory. Natalie’s research contributions focus on innovative teaching methods to enhance student engagement and learning outcomes. Research interests include student misconceptions, instructional materials, and integration of technology to STEM courses. Outside of the university, Natalie has a passion for theater and architecture. Before finding her passion for chemistry education, she was a theater major and has an associate’s degree in computer aided Drafting and Design. ©American Society for Engineering Education
thegraduate research training experience.By fostering growth as researchers and professionals, graduate education in engineering preparesstudents for careers in either academia or industry. In addition to providing technical trainingand knowledge, graduate education should help students build confidence in their capabilities,develop specialized research skills, and feel connected to both the academic and professionalcommunities [1]. While these broad goals generally align with established student outcomes,such as those specified by the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) orthe Canadian Engineering Accreditation Board (CEAB), they also reflect the unique challengesof advanced research training.Works that empirically assess the
divergent thinking exercises and approaches to design," Technology & Engineering Teacher, Article vol. 78, no. 2, pp. 26-31, 2018. [Online]. Available: http://proxy- tu.researchport.umd.edu/login?ins=tu&url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direc t=true&db=ehh&AN=132027271&site=eds-live&scope=site.[8] N. Mentzer, S. Farrington, and J. Tennenhouse, "Strategies for teaching brainstorming in design education," Technology and Engineering Teacher, vol. 74, no. 8, p. 8, 2015.[9] K. Leahy, S. R. Daly, S. McKilligan, and C. M. Seifert, "Design fixation from initial examples: Provided versus self-generated ideas," Journal of Mechanical Design, vol. 142, 101402, pp. 1-11, 2020.[10
Information Sciences and Technology at Penn State Abington. He has a Ph.D. and MISE from Auburn University in Industrial and Systems Engineering and a B.Sc. in Software Engineering and double major in Industrial Systems Engineering from Izmir University of Economics. His research interests are warehousing, optimization, and information systems. Dr. Ozden has published in various journals/conferences including Computers and Operations Research and Naval Research Logistics. His website address is https://www.gokhanozden.com. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Investigating the Impact of an Online Freehand Sketching and Spatial Visualization Intervention on First-Year Engineering
knowledge solidifies its importance.,” J Educ Psychol, vol. 101, no. 4, p. 817, 2009.[11] C. Hill, C. Corbett, and A. St Rose, Why so few? Women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. ERIC, 2010.[12] D. Reilly, D. L. Neumann, and G. Andrews, “Gender differences in spatial ability: Implications for STEM education and approaches to reducing the gender gap for parents and educators,” Visual-spatial ability in STEM education: Transforming research into practice, pp. 195–224, 2017.[13] S. Sorby and N. Veurink, “Are the visualization skills of first year engineering students changing?,” in 2010 Annual Conference & Exposition, 2010, pp. 15–190.[14] Ç. İ. İleri, M. Erşan, D. Kalaça, A. Coşkun, T
education and developed STEM curricula. Sehba’s leadership shines through her involvement in the Bridge to Engineering Success at Tufts (BEST) program and her work as a Robotics Head Coach. She is also dedicated to expanding STEM education and has created technology-based programs for low-income students. Her journey is a testament to her commitment to educational equity and inclusive STEM opportunities. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 More Than a Summer Bridge (Work in Progress)The Bridge to Engineering Success at Tufts (BEST) program was established at Tufts Universityto support underrepresented students. BEST focuses on providing holistic support to
design process, from conceptualization to testing and evaluation.Results from the ISE measurement instrument show significant increases in six of eight ISEfactors exclusively in the research group. Reflective responses support these results and highlightthat active and experiential learning with integrated design elements can be augmented byleveraging technology, leading to a challenging and yet fulfilling and meaningful learningexperience.IntroductionEngineering education is undergoing a critical shift to integrate experiential and design-basedlearning into traditionally analytical curricula [1–3]. Although first-year engineering courses andsenior capstone projects often emphasize creativity and innovation, second- and third-yearcourses
on how CAD can be used to understand and improve design.Dr. Alexander R. Murphy, Florida Polytechnic University Dr. Alexander Murphy is currently an Assistant Professor at Florida Polytechnic University. Before this position, he held a Research Associate appointment at the University of Texas at Dallas (UTD). He was awarded an ASEE eFellows fellowship funded by NSF for the postdoctoral research position at UTD. He completed my Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering in July of 2021 at the Georgia Institute of Technology in Atlanta, Georgia. In Spring of 2018, he was awarded an NSF GRFP fellowship in STEM Education and Learning Research. Dr. Murphy’s research areas include engineering design theory, design methodology
AchievementAbstractThe National Science Foundation (NSF) Scholarships in Science, Technology, Engineering, andMathematics (S-STEM) program supports low-income, high-achieving STEM students throughscholarships and tailored support services. This paper compares the implementation and impactof three different S-STEM projects across three diverse institutions—Rowan University, AlbanyState University, and Tennessee University, highlighting their distinct approaches and outcomesfor diverse student populations.At Rowan University (RU), a public R2 university in the northeastern United States, the 5-yearS-STEM project — Engineering Persistence: Support System for Low-Income Students toCatalyze Diversity and Success — targets undergraduate engineering students
Lafayette (COE) Dr. Suzanne Zurn-Birkhimer is Associate Director of the Women in Engineering Program and Associate Professor (by courtesy) in the Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences at Purdue University. She conducts research around student success.Ing. Mayari I. Serrano, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI) Mayari Serrano Anazco is a visiting clinical assistant professor in the Honors College and College of Engineering at Purdue University. She has authored, co-authored, implemented, and assessed learning activities, outreach activities, and workshops focused on modifying negative attitudes towards technology and engineering and increasing knowledge of several topics of STEM (science
Paper ID #46672Investigating the capabilities and limitations of ChatGPT to perform programmingassignments from an introductory R programming courseDr. Lucie Guertault, North Carolina State University at Raleigh ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Investigating the capabilities and limitations of ChatGPT to perform programming assignments from an introductory R programming course 1. IntroductionLarge language models (LLMs) are generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools capable ofperforming various natural language processing tasks such as generating text and engaging inconversations with
thatare produced by students. Traditionally, the emphasis in engineering education has been onproblem sets, exams, and reports (written artifacts). Non-written artifacts were limited to livepresentations/demonstrations. With the ubiquity of video recording and editing technology,students are now producing more non-written work such as videos demonstrations, recordedpresentations, podcasts, etc. In addition, students are producing digital artifacts that areinherently non-written like solid models, visual simulations, and animations.In many cases, instructors apply the traditional modes of feedback to non-written work. Theutility of this is unclear [10]. In particular, the precision and specificity of feedback is reducedsince there is not a
computational thinking, engineering design, technology, and systems thinkingthrough hands-on, collaborative, student-driven projects. Camp sessions are co-facilitated by localK-12 teachers and undergraduate student mentors from the University of Florida. The GGEEprogram prioritized the hiring of undergraduate student mentors who were from the school districtshosting the camps.In this exploratory mixed methods study, undergraduate student mentor perceptions of near-peermentorship are used to assess the GGEE program’s impact on participant STEM identity andexplore the personal benefits of participation. This paper reports on the following researchquestions: 1) How does serving as near-peer mentors to K-12 student mentees in an educationalSTEM summer
Southeast Section Annual Conference, Louisville, KY, 2007. [7] J. Prasad, A. Goswami, B. Kumbhani, C. Mishra, H. Tyagi, J. H. Jun, K. K. Choudhary, M. Kumar, N. James, V. R. S. Reddy et al., “Engineering curriculum development based on education theories,” Current Science, pp. 1829–1834, 2018. [8] S. R. Patil and P. S. Ghatage, “Curriculum development of an engineering pg program at an autonomous institute–a case study,” Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, vol. 32, no. 4, 2019. [9] R. Molontay, N. Horv´ath, J. Bergmann, D. Szekr´enyes, and M. Szab´o, “Characterizing curriculum prerequisite networks by a student flow approach,” IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 491–501, 2020.[10] S. M
, institutional support, funding pressures, and access tomentorship [9], [10], [11]. Of these factors, psychological barriers have been found to becommon experience amongst higher education’s faculty, students and postdocs [12], [13], [14],[15], [16], [17]. In MIRNs, where participants must navigate complex structures, diverseinstitutional cultures, and the demands of collaboration across disciplines and geographies, thesefactors and barriers may be exacerbated–especially for participants from historicallyunderrepresented groups in science and engineering.Historically, the culture of science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) fields has beencharacterized by rigid hierarchies, intense competition, and an emphasis on individualachievement over
Vignesh Kumar Karuppasamy is a master’s student in the School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at the University of Ottawa. He holds a Bachelor of Technology in Computer Science and Engineering from Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham. Prior to his graduate studies, he worked as a Software Engineer at NortonLifeLock Inc. (formerly Symantec) for over three years. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Motivation and Learning Strategies - What Can University Engineering Design Courses Do to Help Students and What Must Students Do?AbstractEngineering design courses attempt to teach students how to design products and services thataddress problems
several premier journals, including the Journal of Educational Psychology, Journal of Higher Education, and Science and Engineering and Ethics. She is a contributing author to several books published by Oxford University Press, Teachers College Press, and University of California Press. She served as President for the Korean American Educational Researchers Association, including President in 2013-2014, and Chair of the KAERA Board of Directors in 2019-2020.Dr. Jerry Lynn Dahlberg Jr, University of Tennessee Space Institute Jerry Dahlberg is the Senior Director of Research at the University of Tennessee Space Institute. Prior to joining UTSI, he was an Assistant Teaching Professor and Senior Design Committee Chair at the
, 2023, doi: 10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2023043053.[14] R. Atkinson and M. Mayo, “Refueling the US innovation economy: Fresh approaches to science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education,” 2010.[15] J. C. Weidman, “Undergraduate socialization: A conceptual approach,” in Higher education: Handbook of theory and research, vol. 5, J. C. Smart, Ed., Agathon, 1989, pp. 289–322.[16] J. C. Weidman and L. T. DeAngelo, Eds., Socialization in higher education and the early career: theory, research and application. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2020.[17] E. Godfrey, “Understanding disciplinary cultures: The first step to cultural change,” in Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research, 1st
scientific computing in Python,” Nat. Methods, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 261–272, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2.[20] R. Bijker, S. S. Merkouris, N. A. Dowling, and S. N. Rodda, “ChatGPT for Automated Qualitative Research: Content Analysis,” J. Med. Internet Res., vol. 26, p. e59050, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.2196/59050.[21] J. Roy, C. Wilson, A. Erdiaw-Kwasie, and C. Stuppard, “Engineering and engineering technology by the numbers 2019,” Am. Soc. Eng. Educ., 2020.[22] R. C. Slotnick and J. Z. Boeing, “Enhancing qualitative research in higher education assessment through generative AI integration: A path toward meaningful insights and a cautionary tale,” New Dir. Teach. Learn., p. tl.20631, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.1002/tl.20631
Paper ID #46323The Effects of Course Goals on Student Motivation in Computer-Aided DesignCoursesDr. Tyler Carter Kreipke CSC, University of Portland Tyler Kreipke, CSC, received his Bachelor of Science from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology in 2011, majoring in Biomedical Engineering with a concentration in Biomaterials and minoring in German. He completed his doctorate in Bioengineering from the University of Notre Dame in 2017, where his dissertation focused on bone mechanobiology. He completed his Master of Divinity at the University of Notre Dame in 2023, and was ordained to the Catholic priesthood as a member of the
students in focus in the United States higher education institutions. In addition, Mr. Halkiyo is interested in broadening the participation of engineering education in Ethiopian universities to increase the diversity, inclusivity, equity, and quality of Engineering Education. He studies how different student groups such as women and men, rich and poor, students from rural and urban, and technologically literate and less literate can have quality and equitable learning experiences and thrive in their performances. In doing so, he focuses on engineering education policies and practices in teaching and learning processes, assessments, laboratories, and practical internships. Mr. Halkiyo has been teaching different Civil