values linked to motivation (perceived as important, of low negative consequence, enjoyable, and beneficial) • Disruptive to current thinking and practices but simple to implementThese guiding principles are grounded in literature on educational change, motivation,organizational studies, and STEM teaching practice. Borrego and Henderson (2014), forexample, provide a review of the effectiveness of a number of STEM education changestrategies. They organize their review around the model put forth by Henderson, Beach, andFinkelstein (2011), which organizes change strategies based on: 1) whether the desired change ispredetermined or emergent and 2) whether the scope of the change is intended to impact anindividual or an entire
preparation in mathematics, which has been shown to predict student success in engineeringschool [1, 2, 3]. It is also widely acknowledged that calculus in particular is a significant barrierfor many undergraduate engineers, because many students who do not perform well in their firstsemester of mathematics do not stay in an engineering major [4, 5]. This is a significant challengefor all engineering schools, since calculus is the basis for higher level engineering concepts, andis therefore generally taught at the beginning of engineering programs. It is important to study first year student retention in engineering programs because of thelarge number of reasons that students may leave in their first year. However, it is also important tolook
given the growingscope of the challenges ahead and the complexity and diversity of the technologies of the 21 stcentury, creativity will grow in importance” (p. 55).1 However, creativity is not typicallyemphasized in the traditional engineering curriculum and, rather, is relegated to design coursesor entrepreneurship minors. Few core technical courses incorporate elements that requirestudents to demonstrate aspects of the creative process in their assigned work. In fact, researchhas shown that both faculty and students feel that creativity, “is not valued in contemporaryengineering education” (p. 762).2This lack of focus on the creative process in the engineering curriculum has been hypothesized tobe a factor in the retention of engineering
. IntroductionBiomedical Engineering (BME) students at the University of Wisconsin-Madison participate in aunique design curriculum consisting of team-based design courses for seven semesters (Figure 1)[1-2]. Freshman year students work in interdisciplinary teams to solve community-based designchallenges. Then, from sophomore through senior year, our students design, build and test theirinnovative solutions for clients in the healthcare profession, local biomedical industry,community and from our faculty. Within our design curriculum, sophomores (in the fall) workon teams with juniors - forming mentored relationships [3], while seniors participate in outreachas well as prepare their work for a publication. Each course provides a unique challenge orexperience to
, the attitudinal surveys indicate that students in theexperimental sections felt more positively toward the course compared to the control sections,although the difference between the two sections varied by quarter. The results from this studysuggest that the use of Connect and dedication of more class time to worked examples have thepotential to positively impact student performance in fluid mechanics courses.1. IntroductionDuring the past decade, increased access to high-speed internet has created numerousopportunities for instructors to experiment with novel pedagogies. There is growing evidencethat the traditional lecture instructional model, in which class time is dominated by the instructorpresenting information with minimal student
gender, grade-level, and ethnicity.MethodsProtocolWe surveyed studentsattending an engineeringoutreach event before andafter participating in up toseven interactivebiomechanics activities.The activities were asfollows: (1) measurementof maximum jump heightusing a Microsoft Kinectsystem (Redmond, WA)for comparison toprofessional athletes andanimals; (2) measurementof walking characteristicsusing Wii Balance Boards(Nintendo; Redmond,WA); (3) measurement ofmuscle activity usingsurface electrodes (BackYard Brains; Ann Arbor,MI); (4) investigatingobject properties in a Figure 1: Pre-‐ and Post-‐Activities Statements/Questions. virtual reality (VR)environment using a haptic robot and VR
-BASED LEARNINGAbstractThis research paper evaluates the influence of class size in a project-based learning course. Theimpact of the student-faculty ratio and the overall class size on the learning process has beendiscussed and debated in the pedagogical literature for many years.1, 2 A significant number ofthese studies has been particularly limited to K-12 education, generating a passionate discussionon public policy and cost of education. There is relatively limited data on the impact of class sizeon undergraduate engineering education. This study investigates the influence of class size on thelearning process by evaluating student perception of learning and the achievement of learningoutcomes. Assessment data and an end-of-semester survey
very useful for the instructors when theyillustrated related topics to the students throughout the semester.IntroductionStatics and particle dynamics is a sophomore-level course required by most engineering majorsat universities. Compared to the introductory physics classes, where the focus is on concepts, amajor element of these classes in the engineering context is on being able to bring multipleconcepts together for making qualitative judgements. It is quite challenging for many students torelate what is covered in class to how bodies actually behave, especially if they do notunderstand concepts correctly. It is then essential for instructors to know what commonmisconceptions students have and how to correct them. Clement [1] studied
, teamwork,and critical thinking, to name a few.1-3The structure and implementation of the laboratory course will necessarily have a significantimpact on the extent to which these skills are developed. In particular, the use of open-endedlaboratory activities, as opposed to narrowly defined “recipe”-style activities, seems to beparticularly critical for learning and thinking skill development, as shown by several studies inchemical engineering unit operations courses. One previous study suggests that the use of “ill-posed problems” in unit operations can improve teamwork, critical thinking, and problem-solving, and that active engagement of the students in the problem-solving process can improveretention, decision-making, and self-directed learning
found in the overallengineering self-efficacy of male and female students using independent sample t-tests.Univariate Analysis of Variance also revealed gender differences in the importance of variouselements of self-efficacy to a student's interest in becoming an engineer. Specifically, self-efficacy in traditional STEM coursework predicted interest in becoming an engineer for male butnot female students. For female students, experience in the ENGR 102 HS course was found topredict interest in becoming an engineer. This finding demonstrates the positive impact theENGR 102 HS course has on female students.1. IntroductionIn order to compete in the global market, the United States must continue to train the brighteststudents in Science
exposed to such as hands-on earthquake and coastal engineering projects wasattained. Lastly, the Ambassadors exhibited a shorter time to degree completion with their peerswho did not participate in the EAP.Introduction The Engineering Ambassador Program (EAP) was incepted in 2009 as a professionaldevelopment program for undergraduate students in engineering disciplines with an outreachmission to the K-12 students for presenting what engineers do [1, 2]. Studies have shown that theknowledge of students about a field of study is the key factor that influences their interest inconsidering a major [3,4]. The program has since expanded and is administered in multipleinstitutions. The program has also exhibited significant positive impacts on
learning. This coursetypically has 59-120 sophomore and junior level mechanical engineering students enrolled andhas been taught in a flipped format, using the SCALE-UP model (Beichner, 2008), for severalsemesters. By design, the course relies heavily on peer-to-peer instruction through cooperativelearning, and beginning in the semester of Spring 2016, the instructor aimed to move fromcooperative groups to high performing teams using principles of team-based learning (L. K.Michaelsen, Knight, & Fink, 2002). Three primary research questions were examined: 1) whateffect does the implementation of TBL have on individual student learning, compared to anoffering of the course prior to implementation; 2) what effect does the implementation of
to have a lower level of competency. Despite these findings, less than 1% of studentsreported that the gender of an instructor affected their use of SI. It was found, however, thatstudents, especially female students, more often reported that they found their male instructors tobe more intimidating than female instructors. It was also found that students who had reportedhaving an intimidating male instructor were less likely to seek SI. As shown in previous studies,use of SI has had a positive impact on student performance in a course. Therefore it is possiblethat the gender of a student and their instructor could impact overall student performance.Introduction and BackgroundThe study discussed in this paper sought to determine the impacts
leadentrepreneurial activities on campus. The most common methods in embedding entrepreneurshipeducation within the curriculum are offering a foundational course on entrepreneurship and/oroffering a minor in entrepreneurship. Business schools commonly offer the courses onentrepreneurship.Business schools and business education has been around since the latter half of the 19th century.Khurana provides a historical account of business education in the US, indicating that much ofits development was driven by market need.1 Nino cites Institutional Factors, including limitedpractical training of faculty, as one of the main challenges facing business education due to theever-changing demands of the economic market.2 Rauch and Hulsink credit much of the rise
Fig-1). 14% 15% 33% 33% Onceormoretimesperweek Onceormoretimespermonth ParticipatedActivelyinonesemester Seldomusedthespace Figure1-Frequencyofparticipation/useinRichardL'AbbéMakerspaceThe focus of this paper is on understanding the impact that Makerspaces have on cultivatingstudent CoPs in engineering schools. We argue that Makerspaces can provide an environment oncampus that facilitates the growth of student CoPs. For this study, by “cultivating” we
Mastering Engineering learning system for the textbook Mechanics ofMaterials, 10th Edition, by R. C. Hibbeler, was used together with that textbook for the course.Different educational components in the Mastering system available for use included:1) coaching activities in the form of instructional videos regarding how to solve problems,2) tutorials consisting of problems to be solved that provided a stated learning outcome andintermediate, optional hints to help students if they got stuck, and 3) end-of-section problems thatprovided no intermediate hints and were similar to the textbook homework problems. Inaddition, a “Continuously Adaptive Learning” feature could be specified that looks at studentperformance on the main homework assignment given
learning and group problem solving (Figure 1). These facilities havebeen an important component of producing pedagogical shifts in the KU SOE, but as morefaculty have shifted to student-centered teaching practices, a need for additional in-classinstructional support has become clear. Supporting the shift in teaching practices towardsstudent- centered models was a key motivation for creating the UGTF Program at KU. Figure 1: Active learning classroom in the KU SOEThe KU SOE program was piloted with four UGTFs in two classes in Spring 2015, and hassince grown to a cohort of 28 UGTFs supporting learning activities in 13 classes across theSOE in Spring 2017 (Table 1). A total of 3,603 student credit hours are being impacted
education and project-based learning.Dr. Louis A. DiBerardino III, Ohio Northern University Dr. DiBerardino is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Ohio Northern University. His teaching and research interests are in first-year engineering, dynamic systems, and musculoskeletal biome- chanics. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Impact of Various Pedagogies on Design Confidence, Motivation, and Anxiety of First-Year Engineering StudentsIntroductionThe content and pedagogies of first-year engineering programs vary widely from institution toinstitution. In the content space, efforts are underway to establish a first-year body of knowledge[1][13][14
, and to what extent are they interested in impact-driven work?2.2 Impact-Driven Interest as a Career ChoiceThere are many capacities in which one may address societal challenges, e.g. as a volunteer,employee, and/or founder. To narrow the scope, the current study explores how engineeringundergraduates consider addressing societal challenges as a career choice.In the early 1990’s Robert Lent proposed a model of career choice called Social CognitiveCareer Theory (SCCT, see Figure 1) that provides a framework for understanding, explaining,and predicting the processes through which people develop occupational choice (Lent & Brown,2006; Lent, Brown, & Hackett, 1994). The SCCT model has been shown to be useful inpredicting career choice
, technology, engineering, and mathematics jobs in the United States are expected togrow nearly twice as fast as other fields by 2020 [1]. Hence, STEM education is crucial to theultimate success of our young people. Unfortunately, there is a shortage of both interested andadequately prepared K-12 students in STEM subjects, especially among minority youth andyoung women [2]. Data shows that among the high school seniors who took the ACT in 2013,only 23 percent expressed interest in STEM majors and fields. Only half of the students whopursue STEM major’s graduate with a STEM-related degree [3].Gaps exist in science and math achievements for students that impacts success in college,especially in engineering programs [4]. The reasons are many, including
Hampton University, VA. He received his electrical engineering doctorate from Morgan State University, Baltimore, MD, in 2005. His research interests include System Level Synthesis Techniques and K-16 Integrative STEM education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 ASEE HBCU Content Paper 1 AbstractThis paper presents findings from a new phase of a multi-year project that is initiatingtechnology supported experiment centric approaches to learning in electrical and computerengineering courses at 13 Historically Black Colleges and Universities. During this new phase, aseries of
leads an NSF/Research Experiences for Teachers (RET) site on interdisciplinary water research. He has published over 85 papers in peer-reviewed journals and conferences.Dr. Gopalkrishna Joshi, KLE Technological University I hold a PhD in Computer Science and Engineering. Areas of research: 1. Data Engineering 2. Engineering Education Research Current position: Professor and Head of Computer Science and Engineering, Director of Centre for En- gineering Education Research c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Implementation of a First-Year Engineering Course and Active Learning Strategies at a University in IndiaAbstract: This paper presents the
Bioengineering Capstone ReportsIn addition to technical skill development, engineering undergraduate curricula must also fosterdevelopment of effective communication skills. The capstone report often plays an instrumentalrole in this development, as it comprises both the final assessment of student communicationperformance and it is the most significant opportunity for active learning of in-disciplinecommunication skills. Peer review has been proposed as an ideal means to provide students withmuch-needed formative feedback.1–3 In addition, peer review has the potential to increase studentinterpersonal communication skills and metacognition, provided that the review activity isstructured to encourage constructive contributions and reflection.In this
audiences evaluating work using analytic rubrics have been found toscore holistically, based on their overall impressions of the work (Rezaei & Lovorn, 2010)--andwe wanted the expectations of our course to map more effectively onto this reality.Our Alternative Holistic Rubric SystemOur solution was to collaboratively develop a single holistic rubric (see Figure 1 below) thatwould be used for all grading of the major project deliverables (reports and presentations), aswell as for the communication portion of all smaller individual and group assignments. (Thetechnical grading for non-project-deliverable assignments is done by a student grader, andstudent graders aren’t allowed to apply open-ended rubrics; therefore, for these assignments
meansfor verifying design themes, aesthetics, and/or obstacles.Section 1: IntroductionAcademic engineering institutions strive to prepare students for the engineering profession.Typical engineering curriculum builds strong foundational skills in mathematics and scienceduring the first two years of engineering education. Institutions vary on when students can electto study an engineering discipline. Students often begin their engineering education in a specifieda discipline. Other institutions offer an introduction to engineering fundamentals or generalengineering course with students choosing a specific discipline after their first year. At FloridaInstitute of Technology (FIT), most students elect a discipline before matriculating. However
explicitly shows how concepts areconnected.The main goal of the restructuring the camp was to reduce this confusion and improvecomprehension. To do this, we utilized the transfer of learning theory. The transfer of learningtheory states that comprehension of topics can be shown when students have an opportunity toput both new and old information to use when solving a new problem15. Royer discusses the ideain depth and brings to light the idea of using transfer of information as an indication thatunderstanding has been gained16. Different degrees of understanding can be achieved whentransfer occurs in different ways. A schematic explaining the degrees of concept mastery can beseen in Figure 1. Figure 1: Royer’s Varying Degrees of
and engineering technology problems. The courseprovides an introduction to computer operating systems, programming language, and technicalsoftware.The ABET criteria (1) covered by this course are a, b, c, d, e, and f, and at the end of this coursethe students will be proficient in working with Word, Excel, PowerPoint, and will have the basicknowledge of working with one or two of the Engineering software like Matcad, Matlab, etc.The present work offers a comparison between two different teaching strategies, named herein“Method 1” and “Method 2”, with the goal of identifying the best strategy for improving thestudents’ skills and retention.In Method 1, the course starts with an overview of the Microsoft Office software: Word, Excel,Power Point
perceptions of the peer review process.The study was implemented over two semesters with iterative revisions in instruction madebetween semesters based on initial findings. Results suggest that peer review can increasestudent performance, as long as reflections are used to prompt student revision, regardless of theclass delivery method or assignment type.IntroductionEarly in their careers, engineers spend 20-40% of their time writing; as they move to middlemanagement, the writing requirements increase to 50-70% of their day; finally, engineers insenior management spend 70-95% of their days writing [1]. Despite job requirements for writingthat cut across professions [2], in most disciplines writing is rarely emphasized outside of Englishcomposition
minority students through enhanced mentoring and summer research programs1. IntroductionAccording to the report to the President in 2012 [1] and previous literature [2], less than 40% ofthe students who enter into STEM undergraduate curricula as freshman will actually graduatewith a STEM degree. Only about 20% of STEM-interested underrepresented minority studentsfinish with a STEM degree. The retention of STEM majors is a national problem. Nationwide,less than half the freshman who start in STEM majors graduate with a STEM degree, and at leasthalf of this attrition occurs during the freshman and sophomore year. Clearly, the first two yearsare critical for both academic success and retention of STEM students [3]. STEM students begintheir
. Vanessa Svihla, University of New Mexico Dr. Vanessa Svihla is a learning scientist and assistant professor at the University of New Mexico in the Organization, Information & Learning Sciences program, and in the Chemical & Biological Engineering Department. She served as Co-PI on an NSF RET Grant and a USDA NIFA grant, and is currently co-PI on three NSF-funded projects in engineering and computer science education, including a Revolutioniz- ing Engineering Departments project. She was selected as a National Academy of Education / Spencer Postdoctoral Fellow. Dr. Svihla studies learning in authentic, real world conditions; this includes a two- strand research program focused on (1) authentic assessment, often