studies. Then, wewill delve into the discussion section, where we will interpret the results within the context ofexisting literature and theory. This section will also explore the practical implications of ourfindings for educational institutions. Finally, we will conclude by offering a reflective summaryof the significance of the study and its contributions to entrepreneurial education research.MethodologySurveyA Cronbach's Alpha of 0.890 was attained during the survey validation process for theEntrepreneurial Competencies dimension and 0.876 for the Entrepreneurial Intention dimension.Table 1 shows the corresponding Cronbach´s Alpha reliability analysis by dimensions.Descriptive statistics were used in sample characterization for data analysis
as an analysis toolwith thoughts similar to this: “If engineers are confident in their assumed or measured blastforce and blast profile, Newmark’s Method provides engineers with an extremely accurate wayto predict a structure’s response to a blast load.” Thus, a primary goal of the laboratory wasreached: to demonstrate the benefits of numerical time-stepping procedures in dynamic responsecalculation.Comparison of experimental and numerical results was the focus of this lab, but analytical resultscould – and probably should – be included to provide a complete picture. After reflecting on thelab, the instructor offered the students a comparison with the analytical approaches to estimatingresponse to blast loads in the following lecture period
byJensen and Cross.Further Reflection and Future WorkThe programs in this study are still growing and evolving. Consequently, limitations of this workinclude the current small sample size. One of the consequences of our currently low N is that weare not yet able to break down results by ethnicity, gender identity, or other important identity andbackground variables. However, while it’s true that our N is small (both overall and incomparison with Jensen and Cross), our results do show the strong potential impact ofproject-based engineering programs. As our programs grow and our N increases in future studies,we may observe further differentiation in outcomes with the population studied by Jensen andCross.The results of this research stimulates us to
!Because of the additional time allotted for the fabrication and testing phases, students were ableto reflect on their experience and discuss possible reasons why their predicted results weredifferent from the measured values. This discussion was required as a part of their final report.Table 5 lists excerpts from student team reports that give possible causes for the discrepanciesbetween experimental and analytical data.Table 5. Panel Project Report Excerpts Detailing Reasons for Differences in Measured and Analytical Data The team were able to see how variations and discrepancies in the manufacturing, however small, can cause large variations in performance. Some of the reasons behind some discrepancies between the data are human error
further test/collect data on lubricated and non-lubricated applications.Bibliography 1. Standard Test Method for Calibration and Operation of the Falex Block-On-Ring Friction and Wear Testing Machine. ASTM International, 1 May 2019. 2. Standard Test Method for Ranking Resistance of Materials to Sliding Wear Using Block- On-Ring Wear Test. ASTM International, 1 June 2017. 3. The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley http://www.utrgv.edu/en-us/ 4. The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley - Engineering Technology program http://www.utrgv.edu/_files/documents/admissions/undergraduate/dp-engineering- technology-bs.pdf 5. Fornaro, R.J., Heil, M.R, and Alan L. Tharp, A. L., 2006, “Reflections on 10 years of sponsored
to comprise anAdditive Manufacturing Skills sub-scale. The content reflects the specific skills identified in theproject design. Students respond using a 6-point Likert-type scale from 1 (Completely Uncertain)to 6 (Completely Certain).Cronbach's coefficient alpha was calculated to assess the internal consistency of each scale. TheEngineering Skills Self-Efficacy sub-scale values were good and consistent with those reportedin previous research. The value was borderline for the newly developed Additive ManufacturingSkills scale, suggesting that the number or content of the items may need to be reviewed.The means for all the scales were above the mid-point, suggesting that students had confidencein their abilities. As more data is collected in
engagement. As the communication landscapecontinues to change, instructors should consider soliciting feedback from industryrepresentatives relevant to their graduates.AcknowledgementsThis work is supported by the National Science Foundation under grant number 2120775 . Anyresults expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation. The authors would also like to acknowledge the industry representatives fortheir time in completing the survey.References[1] D. P. Dannels, "Learning to Be Professional: Technical Classroom Discourse, Practice, and Professional Identity Construction," Journal of Business and Technical Communication, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 5-37, 2000/01/01 2000, doi
studies to develop; 4) create more case studies; and 5) evaluate transfer oflearning by varying the sequence of operations in the case study.6. AcknowledgementsThis material was supported by the National Science Foundation’s Improving UndergraduateSTEM Education (IUSE) Program (award no. 2044449). Any opinions, findings, andconclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do notnecessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References1. Hsieh, S. and Pedersen, S. “Design and evaluation of modules to teach PLC Interfacing Concepts,” Proceedings of the 2023 ASEE Annual Conference, June 25-28, 2023, Baltimore, MD.2. Hsi, S. and Agogino, A.M. “The impact and instructional benefit of using
,having familiarity with search engines and open AI. This is reflected in the highest self-evaluation scores even before the lab session commenced. The lab strategically incorporateddatabases from the college library, highlighting their importance for finding peer-reviewedpublications and ensuring proper citation in reports. Most students observed an improvementin learning skills through lab practice, with only a couple having prior experience in search andcitation. Communication, Poster, & Data: Sophomore students already had experience aboutoral presentation, which includes poster presentation, data processing in the freshman year fromtheir intro to engineering course at Union college. Students feel they already come with a
reflective standpoint of the author employed in a senior management position. The authorprovides insights and discussion involving practical experience.IntroductionThe precise definition of an international branch campus remains somewhat ambiguous and lacksuniversal agreement on a global scale. The term typically refers to an overseas extension of ahigher education institution, either wholly owned and operated by the institution itself, orestablished as a collaborative venture with international institution as a partner [1]. They mayoffer a range of academic programs, including undergraduate and graduate degrees, as well ascertificate programs, language courses, and short-term study abroad opportunities. It wasreported that in 2017 there were 263
, particularly in the first year.IntroductionTeamwork is an important skill for engineering students and is often a key component of first-year engineering courses. Research has shown that to foster development of teamwork skills,activities should be carefully structured with ample opportunities for practice, constructivefeedback, monitoring, and reflection [1]. One well-established way to develop teamwork skills iscooperative learning, which is a structured form of group work [2]. Cooperative learning is basedon five important tenets: mutual interdependence, individual accountability, face-to-facesupportive interaction, guided practice of interpersonal skills, and regular self-assessment ofteam functioning [3]. Oakley et al. [4] provide a comprehensive
engineers, as it makes them moreenthusiastic to participate in engineering and therefore helps them perform better.Four of the papers showed a marked improvement in underrepresented student’s performancewhen those students were given representation in the form of discussing or showing an engineersimilar to their identity, either in the form of online platforms with diverse avatars of engineers orguest speakers (Casey, E. et al, 2023; Gunjan Tomar & Vineeta Garg, 2021; Good, J. J. et al.,2020; Aguirre-Muñoz, Z. et al., 2021). One paper focused on giving students a space to developtheir own identity in connection to their career path through reflective journaling (Tran, K., Barreraet al., 2022). Two papers focused on giving students either a
a second language.This may impact their ability to thrive in the first semester. Lack of confidence to engage inconversations during the first semester could also affect their ability to navigate the academicexpectations as well as their willingness to explore and utilize campus resources. In this paper,first-semester international students in a graduate engineering program were asked to reflect ontheir academic experience to identify the critical success factors. An anonymous, non-scientificsurvey was designed to gather feedback from the students at the end of their first semester. Allstudents in the class were international students taking on-campus courses in the United Statesfor the first time. The following section presents a brief
reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.References1. K. G. Wolfinbarger, R. L. Shehab, D. A. Trytten, and S. E. Walden, "The influence of engineering competition team participation on students' leadership identity development," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 110, no. 4, pp. 925-948, 2021.2. A. B. Hargadon, "Brokering knowledge: Linking learning and innovation," Research in Organizational Behavior, vol. 24, pp. 41-85, 2002. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0191-3085(02)24003-4.3. A. B. Hargadon, "Firms as knowledge brokers: Lessons in pursuing continuous innovation," California Management Review, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 209-227, 1998. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.2307/41165951.4. J. Saldaña, The
computing, and utilizing a unique large scalelocation dataset. In all these cases, the instructors were not the experts but acted more as guidesto graduate student learning.To foster co-created knowledge and a shared learning process, previous versions of this coursehad students add notes to a wiki during the semester. This shared recording space allowedstudents to reflect on and build off each other’s knowledge. Expanding on this constructivistapproach, the SCHOLAR model was introduced in the “emerging technologies” course for fallof 2023, focusing on generative AI. Instead of a wiki, each student built a tutorial about someaspect of generative AI and/or its use in scholarly research. Examples included: Gradio Library Tutorial
score of zero. The lowervariability in scores also may reflect the quick decision-making required during real-time gradingof the exams, as opposed to more contemplative grading possible for a written exam. Differencesin grading between oral exams and transcripts of oral exams also was noted by Thomas andcoworkers [16].Role of Oral Exams in Environmental Engineering EducationWhen asked for their exam preference in engineering courses, respondents expressed apreference for written exams, although nearly one-third of respondents indicated they preferredan equal number of oral and written exams (All Written: 4.9%, Mostly Written/Some Oral:58.9%, Equal: 31.6%, Mostly Oral/Some Written: 4.3%, All Oral: 0.3%). These responsesindicate a desire on the
-boarding activities, researchexperience, mentor experience, program interactions, and reflect on the gains from programparticipation. This study did not include survey data on participants perceptions of the programdue to the limited number of participant responses. Based on the focus groups conducted,participants reported that this experience was highly valued and significantly increased theirmotivation for pursuing future research and careers. Participants also reported that the programallowed them to develop and refine their professional and research skills, enabling them to applyconcepts learned during their undergraduate studies to their research projects. Additionally,participants described faculty mentors as supportive, understanding, and
. It is good for students to be more preparedto enter the workforce, but many rely on robotic and trivial tasks that are repeated. This takesaway their creativity in offering inventive solutions to their company. This is reflective in therecent course work, where students look to copy solutions to previous problems and incorporatethem into similar problems without thinking of other solutions. This culminates to the need foran industry-led project, but one in which the student also gives input and shows their creativityby applying the technology that exists at the industry to find alternate use for it.ObjectiveThe objective of this paper is to analyze the intertwining of industry led projects andtechnologies with research from students toward a
recruiting students.Workshop SessionsAs mentioned in the introduction, the pedagogical techniques employed in all of the workshopsare active-learning student-centered methods. Session contents are determined by the instructorsbased on what they determine is most effective to introduce their topics and disciplines. Sessionsnormally include lecture presentations followed by activities that teach the concepts throughdemonstration or experiment that the students perform themselves. The session descriptionsbelow are reflections of the 2023 workshop. A particularly important component of the programthat makes this possible is the inclusion of teaching assistants that are current undergraduatestudents. These teaching assistants, close in age to the
, and Confidence MOSFET and Effective Resistance 24 Student Enjoyment and ConfidenceResults: One of the major researchquestions we wanted to answer wasthe impact that prerecordeddemonstration videos had on thestudents’ enjoyment of their time inlecture. To assess this, at the end offour of the lectures where studentswere shown videos, we asked themto reflect on whether thedemonstration video improved theirenjoyment of the lecture. We foundthat in all four of the lectures,between 64% and 71% of thestudents indicated that they “Agreed” or “Strongly Agreed” that the video had improved theirenjoyment of the lecture. Furthermore, only 4% to 8% of the students reported “Disagreed” or“Strongly Disagreed” that the video had
thetargeted area.In LiDAR systems, a laser scanner emits laser beams in various directions, and a sensor detectsthe reflected light. By calculating the time taken for the laser pulses to travel to the target andback, the LiDAR system can accurately ascertain distances to objects. This technology findsextensive applications in diverse fields such as topographic mapping, forestry, autonomousvehicles, geology, urban planning, and archaeology. LiDAR is pivotal in producing highlydetailed and accurate elevation models and three-dimensional representations of landscapes orstructures.Although the technology is sophisticated, only a few smartphone manufacturers, primarily AppleInc., have integrated it into their products. LiDAR scanners are crucial in
and help students develop on paths which they see as valuable. Our view, rooted in theCapabilities Approach, is that education should equip students to lead a life they value. Providingstudents opportunities to achieve, and envision new ways of living is central to the institution,and our role as faculty is to help guide them in our chosen discipline.This work has been supported by the National Science Foundation under EEC- 2022271. Anyopinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those ofthe author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.8. References[1] Mark W. Durm, “An A is not an A is not an A: A History of Grading,” Educ. Forum, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 294
the faculty's efforts to legitimize the students’contributions impact how the students feel about themselves as researchers and how they cancontribute to the group.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under GrantNumbers 2346868 and 2144698. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views ofthe National Science Foundation. We would like to express gratitude to Team Y for participatingin this study and for their willingness to open their meetings to us and provide feedback on theinitial drafts of this paper. We would also like to thank Dr. Nicola Sochacka for her insightfulfeedback and
Competency Mindset in an International, Faculty- led Program in Brazil focused on Sustainable Energy”, 2023 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference Proceedings, Baltimore, MD, 2023. https://peer.asee.org/44647[7] Kane, A., C. Dietz, and C. Pfluger, “Reflections on an Immersive International Engineering Program Focused on Sustainable Energy in Brazil: A Students Perspective”, American Society for Engineering Education Annual Meeting, Baltimore, MD, 2023. https://strategy.asee.org/44075[8] Pfluger, C. “Lessons learned developing and running a virtual, faculty-led, international program on sustainable energy in Brazil”, 2021 American Society for Engineering Education Annual
interactive effects of identity on theengineering workforce that are reflective of the environments and conditions of our field. Extensions of this work in progress will explore multiple regression methods to identifysignificant identity-based interactions related to engineering career success such as salary,employment, and degree attainment. We will also investigate the impacts across different disabilitytype categories provided by the National Survey of College Graduates. A particular emphasis inour forthcoming work will be on centering the experiences of women of color with disabilities asa comparative benchmark. This intentional focus aims to disrupt prevailing notions rooted inWhite, male, able-bodied centrism that have traditionally
prior understanding offluid mechanics and heat transport concepts. A worksheet was given to each participant for useby them during the experiment. The experiment's steps were outlined in the worksheet for theparticipants to follow. The worksheet gave the participants a chance to consider and deliberateabout the ideas being covered. Afterward, each participant was given a post-test to examine howmuch they had learned during the instruction. They were then required to respond to thecognitive engagement survey. Participants received links to the online surveys administered viaQualtrics© at the end of the LCDLMs sessions. The cognitive engagement survey prompts askedparticipants to reflect on their LCDLM facilitated instructions and report how well
engagement and industry interest. The feedback received fromparticipants has been positive, highlighting the relevance and value of such a course in the field ofelectrical engineering. However, through careful consideration and reflection on the courseoutcomes, it became evident that there is an opportunity to enhance its impact further by integratingit with the principles of power system equipment design. A full course titled "Special Topics inPower System Equipment and Asset Management" is under development in either Fall 2024 orSpring 2025. This course will cover the design principles of essential power system componentssuch as transformers, overhead lines, cables, and switchgear, factors influencing their operation,failure mechanisms, and
series versus parallel connections of componentsfor circuits with medium complexity, such as the one seen in Figure 1. Utilizing the research onspaced repetition, the faculty member began drawing small circuits with commonly confusedelectrical connections and creating a poll within Microsoft Teams asking the students todetermine what was connected in series and what was connected in parallel. While this had beenthe first time the faculty taught this course virtually, it was the third term they taught the courseoverall. Reflecting on performance of past cohorts, the faculty member noticed a reduction inmistakes on reducing networks of electrical components throughout the term. Figure 1: Resistor network with medium
Grant No.2306178. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendation expressed in this materialare those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.References[1] J. Trevelyan, “Transitioning to engineering practice,” Eur. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 821–837, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.1080/03043797.2019.1681631.[2] Z. S. Byrne, J. W. Weston, and K. Cave, “Development of a Scale for Measuring Students’ Attitudes Towards Learning Professional (i.e., Soft) Skills,” Res. Sci. Educ., vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 1417–1433, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11165-018-9738-3.[3] R. P. Aleman and et al, “Mind the Gap: Exploring the Exploring the Perceived Gap Between Social and Technical Aspects
solution to a Dynamics questionReferences[1] B. Memarian and T. Doleck, “ChatGPT in education: Methods, potentials and limitations,”Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans, vol. 1, no. 2, p. 100022, Oct. 2023,doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbah.2023.100022.[2] E. L. Hill-Yardin, M. R. Hutchinson, R. Laycock, and S. J. Spencer, “A Chat(GPT) about thefuture of scientific publishing,” Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, vol. 110, Mar. 2023,doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2023.02.022.[3] H. Yu, “Reflection on whether Chat GPT should be banned by academia from the perspectiveof education and teaching,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 14, p. 1181712, 2023.doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1181712[4] J. Qadir, “Engineering Education in the Era