Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division (FPD) Technical Session 7: Teams that Work - Collaboration and Project-Based Learning

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Corrie Walton-Macaulay, Pacific University; Bailey A Weber, Pacific University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs Division (FPD)

]‬ ‭S. Ghanat and D. Ragan, “Implementing Entrepreneurial Minded Learning in a First-Year‬ ‭Seminar Course,” Proceedings of the 2014 ASEE Annual Conference, Portland, OR.‬[‭ 6]‬ ‭Pluskwik, Leung, & Lillesve, 2018‬ ‭[7]‬ ‭N. Duval-Couetil, E. Kisenwether, J. Tranquillo, J. Wheadon, ”Exploring the Intersection‬ ‭of Entrepreneurship Education and ABET Accreditation Criteria,”‬‭The Journal of‬ ‭Engineering Entrepreneurship‬‭, vol. 6, Number 2, pp.44-57,‬‭June 2015.‬ ‭https://doi.org/10.7814/jeenv6n2p3. [Accessed Dec 17, 2017].‬‭[8]‬ ‭ABET, “Changes in Definitions, Criterion 3 and Criterion 5

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED) - Best in DEED

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Grace Burleson, University of Colorado Boulder; James Harper PhD, PE, University of Colorado Boulder

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED)

/improving-student-retention-through-a-redesigned-first-year- engineering-class[2] C. E. Davis, M. B. Yeary, and J. J. Sluss, “Reversing the Trend of Engineering Enrollment Declines With Innovative Outreach, Recruiting, and Retention Programs,” IEEE Trans. Educ., vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 157–163, May 2012, doi: 10.1109/TE.2011.2157921.[3] M. K. Orr, C. Swafford, S. Hahler, and D. Hall, “Factors that influence confidence: Untangling the influences of gender, achievement, and hands-on activities,” in 2014 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) Proceedings, Oct. 2014, pp. 1–5. doi: 10.1109/FIE.2014.7044418.[4] G. W. Bucks, K. A. Ossman, J. Kastner, F. J. Boerio, and J. A. Torsella, “First-Year Engineering Courses’ Effect on

Conference Session

Shaping Inclusive STEM Curriculum and Teacher Development for K-12 Education

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Krista Dulany Chisholm, University of Florida; Sarah Louise Langham, University of Florida; Kassandra Fernandez, University of Florida; Nancy Ruzycki, University of Florida

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE)

) 30+ years 10% 20 – 29 years 20% 15 – 19 years 15% 10 – 14 years 10% 4 – 9 years 30% 0 –3 years 15%Teachers selected the subject area(s) they taught during the 2023-2024 school year, given thefollowing options: Science, Math, STEM/Engineering, ELA, Social Science, or Other. Teacherswere given space to write additional details about the subject(s) they taught for each option listedabove. Subject areas were

Conference Session

GSD 8: Industry and Professional Skills

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jemimmah Namodi, Iowa State University of Science and Technology; Ann M Gansemer-Topf, Iowa State University ; Gül E. Kremer, University of Dayton; Qing Li; Shan Jiang, Iowa State University of Science and Technology

Tagged Divisions

Graduate Studies Division (GSD)

academic and professional interests whilebuilding strong peer and external stakeholder networks. This concept provides support for careerdevelopment through stakeholder involvement [22]. Students are given opportunities to connectwith professionals from the field. The program’s practical and simple design offers a replicablemodel for other institutions. By addressing challenges and expanding on its strengths,universities can ensure graduate education prepares students for both academic excellence andcareer advancement.AcknowledgementsThis work is supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.1954946. Anyopinions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do notnecessarily reflect the views of the

Conference Session

Poster Session-Electrical and Computer Engineering Division (ECE)

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mayur Sanap, North Carolina State University at Raleigh; Arman Badalamenti, North Carolina State University at Raleigh; Devadharshini Ayyappan, North Carolina State University at Raleigh; Sanjana Banerjee, North Carolina State University at Raleigh; Diana Milena Urieta, North Carolina State University at Raleigh; Caren Cooper, North Carolina State University at Raleigh; Michael Daniele, North Carolina State University at Raleigh; James Reynolds, North Carolina State University at Raleigh; Jay F Levine, North Carolina State University at Raleigh; Alper Bozkurt, North Carolina State University; Edgar Lobaton, North Carolina State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer Engineering Division (ECE)

one order of magnitude lowerwhen compared to a Raspberry Pi setup. Another platform is Forabot [31], an accessible robotic system for the imaging andsorting of microscopy fossils. In this article, we present a platform that takes advantage of these recent trends by producingan affordable, reproducible, and easy-to-use 3D imaging system. III. E MBEDDED D ESIGN For the implementation of the mussel imaging system, an ESP32-CAM module was mounted on a servo-motor platform.The ESP32-CAM is a compact camera module that features the ESP32-S chip, priced at approximately $10. It includes anOV2640 camera, several GPIOs for connecting peripherals, a microSD card slot for storing captured

Conference Session

Computers in Education Division (COED) Poster Session (Track 1.A)

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Zifeng Liu, University of Florida; Yukyeong Song, University of Florida; Qimao Yang, University of Florida; Wanli Xing, University of Florida; Jing Guo, University of Florida

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education Division (COED)

. Inaddition to eight questions about students’ background and their QC learning experience, thepre-survey (shown in Table 2) includes five knowledge test questions, such as “Which of thefollowing can form a universal set of quantum gates?”. The five-point attitude questionnaire,adapted from Hanrahan et al. [42]’s work, consists of seven items that explore students’self-efficacy and identity related to QC. The post-survey retains the knowledge test and attitudequestionnaire from the pre-survey and adds a seven-item engagement and usability questionnaire,adapted from Brooke [43]’s study (shown in Table 3). It also includes three open-ended questions,such as “How did the Spin-Quantum Gate Lab aid your understanding of quantum computingconcepts?” and

Conference Session

Military and Veterans Division (MVD) 1 - Access and Integration

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Benjamin Pederson, Air Force Institute of Technology; Mark Reith, Air Force Institute of Technology; David Long, Air Force Institute of Technology; Ralucca A. Gera, Naval Postgraduate School; Edward D White, Air Force Institute of Technology; Jonathan Zemmer, Air Force Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Military and Veterans Division (MVD)

, USA, in 1999, a M.S. degree in Computer Science from the AFIT, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH, USA, in 2003, and a Ph.D. degree in Computer Science from the University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA, in 2009.Dr. David Long, Air Force Institute of Technology David S. Long is an Assistant Professor of Systems Engineering at the Air Force Institute of Technology and a Principal Systems Engineer at KBR. He previously served 25 years in the US Air Force in a variety of positions. His BS Industrial Engineering and Management (North Dakota State University), MS Engineering (California State University, Northridge), and PhD Engineering Systems (Massachusetts Institute of Technology).Ralucca A. Gera

Conference Session

Mechanical Engineering Division (MECH) Poster Session

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mohammed A. Alrizqi, Cornell University; Allison Godwin, Cornell University; Junhyuk Kang, Cornell University; Beatriz Asfora, Cornell University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering Division (MECH)

Projects (VIP) Program at Purdue University: A Research Experience for Undergraduate Students,” in Conference Record - Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers, IEEE Computer Society, 2021, pp. 1141–1145. doi: 10.1109/IEEECONF53345.2021.9723360.[14] H. Li, A. Öchsner, and W. Hall, “Application of experiential learning to improve student engagement and experience in a mechanical engineering course,” European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 283–293, May 2019, doi: 10.1080/03043797.2017.1402864.[15] S. Frerich et al., “Engineering Education 4.0 Excellent Teaching and Learning in Engineering Sciences,” 2016.[16] W. T. Botelho, M. D. G. B. Marietto, J. C. D. M. Ferreira, and E. P

Conference Session

Engineering and Public Policy Division (EPP) Technical Session 2

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Monika Tomar, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Mario Ventresca, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE)

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering and Public Policy Division (EPP)

] Whitley, Heather P., et al. "Practical team-based learning from planning to implementation."American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 79.10 (2015): 149.[3] Michaelsen, Larry K., Arletta Bauman Knight, and L. Dee Fink, eds. Team-based learning: Atransformative use of small groups in college teaching. Taylor & Francis, 2023.[4] Michaelsen, Larry, Michael Sweet, and Dean Parmelee. "Team-Based Learning:Small–group Learning’s Next Big Step: New Directions for Teaching and Learning." (2011).[5] Michaelsen, L. K. "The Essential Elements of Team-Based Learning." Team-Based Learning:Small Group Learning's Next Big Step/Jossey-Bass (2008).[6] Becker, Gary S. The economic approach to human behavior. The University of ChicagoPress, 1976.[7] Elstad

Conference Session

Mechanics Division (MECHS) Technical Session 3

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mikayla R Hoyle, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Melany Denise Opolz, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Jean-Christophe Raymond-Bertrand, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Nikhil Chandra Admal, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign; Wayne L Chang, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign; Thomas Golecki, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Kellie M Halloran, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign; Callan Luetkemeyer, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Brian Mercer, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Matthew West, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign; Mariana Kersh, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics Division (MECHS)

Engineering for supporting this work.References [1] S. O’Leary, “Impact of Entrepreneurship Teaching in Higher Education on the Employability of Scientists and Engineers,” vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 431–442. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.5367/ihe.2012.0128 [2] A. P. Carnevale, M. L. Fasules, and K. Peltier Campbell, “Workplace Basic: The Competencies Employers Want.” [Online]. Available: https://repository.library.georgetown.edu/handle/10822/1062942 [3] N. Duval-Couetil, T. Reed, and S. Haghighi, “Engineering Students and Entrepreneurship Education: Involvement, Attitudes and Outcomes,” vol. 28, pp. 425–435. [4] A. Finley, “How College Contributes ”to” Workforce Success: Employer Views on What Matters Most.” [Online]. Available

Conference Session

Tech Session 1: Integrating Sustainability in Engineering Curriculum: Pedagogy, Assessment, and Systems Thinking

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Esther Roorda, University of British Columbia, Vancouver; Sathish Gopalakrishnan, University of British Columbia, Vancouver

Tagged Divisions

Environmental Engineering & Sustainability Division (ENVIRON)

EOPframework is significantly more detailed and concrete, and is intended to be used as a tool byeducators and researchers during curriculum development and evaluation 23,24,25,26 , providing aconsistent and thorough categorization of different sustainability-related learning outcomes in thecontext of engineering. In other words, the EOP framework can be used to support and evaluatevarious strategies for improving higher-level education (all eight of the change strategies thatHenderson et al. 4 define for facilitating change in STEM education, for example), whereasaccreditation criteria are designed to define a minimum required level of sustainability educationin a policy context (in Henderson et al.’s formulation 4 , the ‘Enacting’ approach).3

Conference Session

ELOS Technical Session 2: Innovative Strategies for Fostering Deeper Learning in Engineering Laboratories

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Peter B Johnson, Imperial College London

Tagged Divisions

Experimentation and Laboratory-Oriented Studies Division (DELOS)

used by other practitioners. If other teachers do implement a similar activity, wewould be interested in collaborating to compare effects in different contexts.References [1] L. D. Feisel and A. J. Rosa, “The role of the laboratory in undergraduate engineering education,” Journal of engineering Education, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 121–130, 2005. [2] G. Rayner-Canham and M. Rayner-Canham, “The heuristic method, precursor of guided inquiry: Henry armstrong and british girls’ schools, 1890–1920,” Journal of Chemical Education, vol. 92, no. 3, pp. 463–466, 2015. [3] J. J. Schwab, “Inquiry, the science teacher, and the educator,” The school review, vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 176–195, 1960. [4] M. Pedaste, M. M¨aeots, L. A. Siiman, T. De Jong, S

Conference Session

Faculty Development: Collaborations

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Blessing Isoyiza ADEIKA, Morgan State University; Oludare Adegbola Owolabi P.E., Morgan State University; Pelumi Olaitan Abiodun, Morgan State University; Kingsley Matthew, Morgan State University; Ellen Wang Althaus, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Ashleigh Wright, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign; Lynford Goddard, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign; Olorunfunmi Samuel Shobowale, Morgan State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

applicabilityAcknowledgmentThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Grant #2308531and #2308532 titled “Collaborative Research: Track 4: Developing Equity-Minded EngineeringPractitioners (DEEP)”. We acknowledge the UIUC DEEP research team for their development ofthe COI instrument and for training Morgan State University coders in its application. Anyopinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of theauthor(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] S. D. Castle et al., "Systemic advantage has a meaningful relationship with grade outcomes instudents’ early STEM courses at six research universities," in Proc. Int. J. STEM Educ. Conf., vol

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED) - Innovative Assessment Strategies in Design

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brian Roth, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Prescott

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED)

forsatisfactory work equivalent to a “high 80’s” grade in a traditional grading system. Full credit isawarded for “satisfactory” work and no credit is given for work that does not meet that standard.Students are allowed unlimited revision to the first of each type of deliverable, but the timeframe is limited to one week. To encourage quality, timely work, students are only allowed torevise two subsequent deliverables.The impact of specifications grading on learning is measured both qualitatively andquantitatively. Student attitudes and behaviors are documented to determine whether the use ofspecifications grading improves teamwork and yields a shift from grade-centric to learning-centric behaviors. The quality of major deliverables is measured using

Conference Session

Construction Engineering Division: AI & Automation

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Anh D. Chau P.E., Florida Gulf Coast University; Cade M. Cratsley, Florida Gulf Coast University; Long Duy Nguyen P.E., Florida Gulf Coast University

Tagged Divisions

Construction Engineering Division (CONST)

, while Cortez & Schmelzenbach[9] shows their potential in MATLAB coding assistance. Further educational applications includeAI's integration into academic advising [10], engineering education [11], and cognitive flexibilitydevelopment for smart city initiatives [12]. While some industry applications, such as Fernandeset al.'s [13] DAVE system, demonstrate custom GPT-powered solutions for BIM environments,our study uniquely focuses on teaching students to develop and deploy their own custom AIchatbots. Through our approach, students learn to create chatbots that can be deployed on theirown websites and easily shared with stakeholders, without requiring extensive programmingknowledge. By emphasizing tailored prompt engineering and leveraging

Conference Session

ENT-5: Pathways for Developing Entrepreneurial Skills Across Educational Levels

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Abigail Mulry, North Carolina State University at Raleigh; Chloe Hincher, North Carolina State University at Raleigh; Olgha Bassam Qaqish, North Carolina State University at Raleigh

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division (ENT)

‭students’ EM three Cs, and students’ increased appreciation of multiculturalism‬ ‭through in-person cultural immersion experiences.‬‭Introduction‬‭ s engineering demand rises and globalization intensifies, fostering multiculturalism is vital for‬A‭global solutions. Transformative learning theory (TLT), developed by Dr. Jack Mezirow in the‬ ‭1970s, explains how adult learners shift perspectives when confronted with challenging‬ ‭experiences‬‭[1,2]‬‭. While TLT guides culturally responsive teaching in international teacher‬ ‭training, it remains underutilized in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) contexts‬ ‭[1]‬‭. This research study explores the impact of international experiences on the development

Conference Session

Architectural Engineering Division (ARCHE) Technical Session 2

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Edoarda Corradi Dell'Acqua, Illinois Institute of Technology; Jamshid Mohammadi, Illinois Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Architectural Engineering Division (ARCHE)

learning. the dynamic and flexibleformat of the Open Educational Resource allows for continuous updates and the integration of newchapters and content ensuring that the material remains current.AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to thank Stephanie Fletcher, Head of Discovery, Metadata, and Technical Servicesat the Galvin Library, and Muhammad S. Khan, Instructional Designer at Illinois Tech’s Center forLeaning Innovation, for their invaluable support in developing this educational material. The authors arealso especially grateful to Sean Murphy, Systems and Open Infrastructure Librarian, and his team at theGalvin Library’s Exploration Space for supporting students with 3D printing and creating a supplementallearning module focused on

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED) - Foundations of Design Theory

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ruben D. Lopez-Parra, Universidad del Norte; Madalyn Wilson-Fetrow, University of New Mexico; Vanessa Svihla, University of New Mexico; Yadeeh Sawyer, University of New Mexico - School of Engineering - Engineering Student Success Center; Christina Salas, University of New Mexico; Carl Willis, University of New Mexico; Andrew Olewnik, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED)

could apply to manycommunities. Figure 1 shows their conversation centering on requirements related to funding andinfrastructure beginning 42 minutes into the session.Figure 1: Team 1’s talk during their initial discussion of requirements, with color coding todraw attention to how they use, share, and distribute their agency in framing the problem.This discussion is characterized by both its tentativeness, with abundant use of modal verbsshowing possibility and potential control, but also some caution, marked by lower agencyconstruction using modal verbs of obligation. The students consistently share their agencythrough common use of the first person plural pronoun, “we,” and by referencing thecommunity, problem context, and stakeholders (“they

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED) - Embedding Industry in Design Education

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alexa Ray Ronsairo Fernando, National University, Philippines

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED)

Conference Session

Motivation and Engagement in Engineering Students

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Hang Zhang, Jining Normal University,China; Hao He; Ming Li, Beijing Foreign Studies University

Tagged Divisions

Student Division (STDT)

procedures for reference.To this end, the theoretical community of engineering education has conductedcontinuous exploration of the topic, trying to summarize and refine the continuousimprovement models. Mary Besterfield-SACRE and Larry J. Shuman were supportedby NSF to conduct a study [7]. They have developed a theoretical framework thathelps to better understand educational outcome based on Bloom’s Taxonomy.Through this framework, each educational outcome is refined into a series ofattributes, and engineering faculty can integrate educational outcome into engineeringprogram through these attributes. Sarapin M I proposed the five-stage programassessment model [8]. Strong S, etc., proposed the eight-stage program assessmentmodel [9]. According to

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED) - AI and Digital Futures in Design Education

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Daniene Byrne Ph.D., Stony Brook University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED)

technological policy development, stakeholder voices and the intertwined cultural, social, and political impacts. My dissertation focused on policy design processes for automated driving systems (ADS). ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Engineering U. S. Responsible AI Policy, A Survey, 2020-2025AbstractThe increase in public access to large-scale AI and the enormous variety of current and potentialapplications has created widespread excitement and sparked concern over unknown andunintended consequences. While AIs rapidly advance into useful tools across broad applications,we do not yet understand AIs’ potential harms, social impacts, and outcomes. The public isincreasingly using free AI

Conference Session

Systems Engineering Division (SYS) Technical Session 2

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Shamsnaz Virani Bhada, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Sarah E. Stanlick, Worcester Polytechnic Institute

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Systems Engineering Division (SYS)

important step towards regularization ofthese topics in education. At the same time, we recognize that a cultural shift needs to occur forengineering educators to both feel comfortable and equipped to teach decolonial systems design,as well as having the tools to effectively do so.References[1] S. Winberg and C. Winberg, “Using a social justice approach to decolonize an engineering curriculum,” IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, EDUCON, pp. 248–254, Jun. 2017, doi: 10.1109/EDUCON.2017.7942855.[2] D. G. Carmichael, “Bias and decision making – an overview systems explanation,” Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems, vol. 37, no. 1–2, pp. 48–61, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.1080/10286608.2020.1744133.[3] M. Agyemang, D

Conference Session

Track 6: Technical Session 2: Empowering Hispanic Engineers' Success Towards Graduate Education with Hybrid Mentorship

Collection

2025 Collaborative Network for Engineering & Computing Diversity (CoNECD)

Authors

Federico Cifuentes-Urtubey, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign; Paola Alexandra Baldaguez Medina, University of Puerto Rico at Mayagüez; Julie E Lorenzo, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Natasha Mamaril, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign

Tagged Topics

2025 CoNECD Paper Submissions, Diversity

during her Ph.D. studies at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, fostering the next generation of Hispanic engineers.Julie E Lorenzo, University of Illinois at Urbana - ChampaignDr. Natasha Mamaril, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Natasha Mamaril is currently the Associate Director for Undergraduate Research in The Grainger College of Engineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Her research interests include academic motivation and the assessment of student learning. She has a B. S. in Chemical Engineering and obtained her M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Educational Psychology from the University of Kentucky. She also has nine years of industry experience

Conference Session

CANCELLED: Track 2: Technical Session 6: Exploring Gender Dynamics in Intercultural Competence Development through a Study Abroad Program

Collection

2025 Collaborative Network for Engineering & Computing Diversity (CoNECD)

Authors

Aparajita Jaiswal, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI); Sakhi Aggrawal, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI); Vidya Reddy Madana, Purdue University

Tagged Topics

2025 CoNECD Paper Submissions, Diversity

Conference Session

Track 1: Technical Session 5: Motivations for Engineering Faculty Engagement in an Inclusive Pedagogy Program

Collection

2025 Collaborative Network for Engineering & Computing Diversity (CoNECD)

Authors

Renee M. Desing, University of Washington; Joyce Yen, University of Washington; Karen Thomas-Brown, University of Washington

Tagged Topics

2025 CoNECD Paper Submissions, Diversity

, “Exploring inclusive pedagogy,” Br. Educ. Res. J., vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 813–828, Oct. 2011, doi: 10.1080/01411926.2010.501096.[8] D. E. Chubin, G. S. May, and E. L. Babco, “Diversifying the engineering workforce,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 73–86, 2005, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00830.x.[9] G. Light, S. Calkins, M. Luna, and D. Drane, “Assessing the Impact of a Year‐Long Faculty Development Program on Faculty Approaches to Teaching”.[10] R. M. Felder and R. Brent, “The National Effective Teaching Institute: Assessment of Impact and Implications for Faculty Development,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 99, no. 2, pp. 121– 134, Apr. 2010, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2010.tb01049.x.[11] Y. Steinert et al., “A systematic review of faculty

Conference Session

ECE-Student Learning and Academic Performance

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Iman Shayegani, University of Cincinnati; Gregory Warren Bucks, University of Cincinnati; Ibrahim Nihad Awartani, University of Cincinnati; So Yoon Yoon, University of Cincinnati

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer Engineering Division (ECE)

Conference Session

Faculty Development: Grading and Artificial Intelligence

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Azadeh Hassani, University of Nebraska - Lincoln; Tareq Daher, University of Nebraska - Lincoln; Guy Trainin, University of Nebraska Lincoln; Jordan M Wheeler, University of Nebraska - Lincoln

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

Conference Session

Engineering Libraries Division (ELD) Technical Session 1

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sara C. Kern, Pennsylvania State University; Denise Amanda Wetzel, Pennsylvania State University; Elliott Rose, The Pennsylvania State University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Libraries Division (ELD)

Paper ID #47453Engineering Connection: Growing Sustainable Outreach for Graduate StudentsSara C. Kern, Pennsylvania State University Sara Kern (she/her) is an Engineering Librarian at Penn State University. She earned her MA in history from Penn State and her MSLIS at Syracuse University. Her research interests include inclusive library outreach and instruction.Ms. Denise Amanda Wetzel, Pennsylvania State University Denise A. Wetzel is the Eric N. and Bonnie S. Prystowsky Early Career Science Libraries Professor and Science & Engineering Librarian at Pennsylvania State University Libraries. She is also the Patent and

Conference Session

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division (LEES) Technical Session 10: Institutions and Structures

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rae Jing Han, University of Washington; Selen Güler, University of Washington; Elizabeth Litzler, University of Washington; Teodora Rutar Shuman, Seattle University; Alan Cheville, Bucknell University; Eva Andrijcic, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Sriram Mohan, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division (LEES)

change.The interview data indicates that larger and more well-established disciplines and departments,particularly those at R1 institutions, may be more heavily siloed, prone to taking on an“institutional mantle” that prioritizes preservation, and have strongly embedded scholar-academic belief systems [24]. For example, one participant mentioned characteristics such as“authoritative textbook[s],” the “old guard” that consists of “long-standing, really successful andinfluential people” and “legendary figures,” and a sense of “history and heritage.” Anotherparticipant reflected that their colleagues who were invested in traditional approaches “genuinelywere opposed to these changes more philosophically.” One changemaker described how suchqualities can

Conference Session

Shaping Inclusive STEM Curriculum and Teacher Development for K-12 Education

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cathy P. Lachapelle, STEM Education Insights; Medha Dalal, Arizona State University; Katie McKeown, Engineering for US All (e4usa™); Jialing Wu, The Ohio State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE)

, which will structure the results:STEM-Related Skills and Content (Table 2); Student Feelings, Attitudes, Agency (Table 3);People, Community, and Social Aspects (Table 4); Characteristics of the Course (Table 5); andOther (Table 5). As can be seen in Figure 1, students’ responses were most frequently coded oneor more times for Characteristics of the Course (47% of codes); 37% of codes referencedSTEM-related skills and content. Eight percent of codes related to people, community, or othersocial aspects as what they liked best about the e4usa class. Four percent of codes discussedstudents’ feelings, attitudes, or agency, and 4% of codes were “other,” most of which were noresponse.To code question 4 regarding the student’s desired profession(s