beadvantageous to tackle this challenge in a way that minimizes additional time investment. Thus, weintroduced an addendum to our weekly departmental research seminar series which we call the“Evan & Eddie Show.” Adopting the talk show format, our UT Austin biomedical engineeringdepartment faculty Dr. Huiliang Wang (“Evan”) and Dr. Edward Castillo (“Eddie”) interview theseminar speaker about their journey to their current position. No advance preparation is required bythe speaker since the activity is centered on conversation. However, speakers are offered theopportunity to suggest questions that they would like to be asked and/or to provide backgroundabout themselves to inform the interview plan. After Evan and Eddie pose a few questions,additional
Paper ID #40904Employing Music as an Entry Point into ClassesDr. William J. Davis P.E., The Citadel William J. Davis is Dept. Head & D. Graham Copeland Professor of Civil Engineering and Director of Construction Engineering at The Citadel in Charleston, SC. His academic experience includes: trans- portation infrastructure planning and design.Dr. Simon Thomas Ghanat P.E., The Citadel Dr. Simon Ghanat is an Associate Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering at The Citadel (Charleston, S.C.). He received his Ph.D., M.S., and B.S. degrees in Civil and Environmental Engineering from Arizona State University
DISCUSSIONThe first author led the efforts to conducted a preliminary data analysis for thisconference presentation and developed a visualization to describe trends that theynoticed in the data. On this slide, we plan to walk through the data analysis process:open coding, themes, visualization, and verification. Open coding was done withMAXQDA by a 4-author team, financial themes were identified by a 3-author team,visualization was done by a 3-author team, and preliminary verification was done by athree-author team. This big (and small) project has very much function in ‘stages’ andwe are still in a preliminary stage. 9 Preliminary Findings INTRODUCTION
ability to understand ethical and professional responsibilities and the impact of technical and/or scientific solutions in global, economic, environmental, and societal contexts. b) An ability to function effectively on teams that establish goals, plan tasks, meet deadlines, and analyze risk and uncertainty. Semester Learning Outcome a Learning Outcome b ABC Rates Project Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Completion Rate Fall 2021 (Baseline data, 75 % 25 % 80
polystyrene andpolycarbonate (HIPS and PC), after performing reciprocating linear abrasion testing with H22 tip.The represented images are using 100 X magnification (a) and 500 X magnification (b). Studentsobserve that the images indicate a smooth appearance of the wear/ abrasion track for HIPS and arough appearance for PC with apparent material delamination for PC (observed at 500 Xmagnification).Students are actively involved during the new designed laboratory in performing testing,conducting measurements, collecting and analyzing results. In the same time, they are gatheringmore skills by becoming familiar with different abrasion testing equipment, analytical balance,profilometer and optical microscope. They are planning and conducting experiments
special capabilities of Excel in solving engineering problems are planned to be explored inthe redesigned course first, before covering the utility of the other two selected computing tools.This decision was made due to the fact that the majority of students already have some basicfamiliarity with Excel, and therefore can probably better grasp the programming fundamentalsusing this basic tool first. One sample Excel spreadsheet for analyzing a beam is presented in thispart of the paper to better illustrate the utility of this computing tool in the discussed computingcourse. The presented example problem is taken from an earlier publication of the author1. In thissample problem, an overhanging beam is subjected to a uniformly distributed load as
of librarian-instructor collaborationaround research-based assignments like persona development. While students seemed to respond 5 Proceedings of the 2024 ASEE North Central Section Conference Copyright © 2024, American Society for Engineering Educationpositively to the persona development assignment, additional research is needed to betterunderstand how this work impacts the way they approach their designs as well as the quality ofthe final projects.The authors plan to create rubrics around stakeholder and persona development for futureiterations of the course. These rubrics will be used to better assess
provided an overview of the new outcomes aswell as potential methods for teaching and assessing.Table 1: Current ABET student outcomes for engineering programs1. an ability to identify, formulate, and solve an ability to function effectively on a team complex engineering problems by applying whose members together provide leadership, principles of engineering, science, and create a collaborative and inclusive mathematics. environment, establish goals, plan tasks, and meet objectives. an ability to apply engineering design to an ability to develop and conduct appropriate produce solutions that meet specified needs
written report and presentation in class. Table 1 summarizes the weekly plan used duringthe CST course.Table 1. CST Course - Weekly Timeline. Week Lecture Topics In Class Activities Introduction to CST and Hands-on activities and written 1 to 8 Systems Archetypes assignments; Start the project Directed readings and discussions; 9 to 12 Mental Models Project updates Case Studies and Personal Communication skills, teamwork, 13 to 14
the Chair of Professional Interest Council III. He has held multiple ASEE leadership positions within the First- Year Programs (FPD) and Computers in Education (CoED) divisions, and with the Ad Hoc Committee on Interdivisional Cooperation, Interdivisional Town Hall Planning Committee, ASEE Active, and the Commission on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion. Estell has received multiple ASEE Annual Conference Best Paper awards from the Computers in Education, First-Year Programs, and Design in Engineering Education Divisions. He has also been recognized by ASEE as the recipient of the 2005 Merl K. Miller Award and by the Kern Entrepreneurial Engineering Network (KEEN) with the 2018 ASEE Best Card Award. Estell
. Ultimately, the goal is to create a data-driven culture that supports ongoingDEI initiatives and fosters a more inclusive and diverse team environment.Conclusion 7 Proceedings of the 2024 ASEE North Central Section Conference Copyright © 2024, American Society for Engineering EducationIn conclusion, this DEI plan is a strategic and comprehensive initiative aimed at fostering adiverse and inclusive community. Through this data analysis the four key goals, paired withSMART objectives, showcase the team's commitment to education, inclusivity, collaboration,and data-driven decision-making.Key conclusions were made from
as an effective indicator of success in STEM, and interventions have beendeveloped to support development in students with weaker spatial skills. 23, 24This has promptedthis research to explore links between spatial skills and communication abilities, as validatedspatial interventions may help improve communication abilities. These current results may alsoprovide unique insights into first-year engineering students’ writing competencies whenreporting on a more authentic (non-graded) engineering task. Such information may be useful ineventually shaping guidance of students’ communication instruction in hopes of better preparingthem for industry; this is the focus of a planned future research study.IntroductionABET requires that students
ofteamwork and embrace its lessons despite personal preferences for working alone.Current practice: Program outcomes, course syllabi and textbooksProgram outcomes: A quick sampling of Engineering program and course outcomes show thatschools promise students expertise in teamwork upon graduation. Stanford University’sMechanical Engineering learning outcomes, follow the ABET learning outcomes, lists sevenlearning outcomes that graduating students are expected to demonstrate. Number 5 is listed as:“an ability to function effectively on a team whose members together provide leadership, create acollaborative and inclusive environment, establish goals, plan tasks, and meet objectives.” [1]Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s BSME Course Objectives
indicator of the effectiveness of the tool overall.Future WorkTo parse out if this change in performance is due to Hawthorne effect, a further study is plannedthat will require the course instructor to explicitly address the check-in results in class (1) forseveral sprints as treatment for some courses to assess the within class difference, and (2) for theentire course as treatment, and another course with check-in but without addressing the check-inresults for control.For the questions, “How are you doing today?” and “Is this school or life-related”, a futurecollaboration is planned with a researcher from counseling to assess if the questions asked and thelanguage used is the most appropriate to capture the general feeling of stress among the
-driven curriculum planning, extensive faculty mentoring, and acompetency-based assessment framework. The TST-ET program allows students to design theirown curriculum with guidance from faculty mentors and focuses on assessing theircompetencies. Unlike traditional engineering programs, these scholars argue that TST-ETencourages students to explore various disciplines and develop a wide range of skills. ThisProceedings of the 2024 ASEE North Central Section Conference 4Copyright © 2024, American Society for Engineering Educationinitiative aims to prepare students for success in the complex professional world of today andresponds to the demand from employers for graduates who possess diverse abilities [10
communication skills. In fact,undergraduate lab (along with capstone design) is very useful in satisfying ABET StudentOutcomes 3 (an ability to communicate effectively with a range of audiences), 5 (an ability tofunction effectively on a team whose members together provide leadership, create a collaborativeand inclusive environment, establish goals, plan tasks and meet objectives) and 6 (an ability todevelop and conduct appropriate experimentation, analyze and interpret data, and useengineering judgment to draw conclusions).There have been significant developments in the use of virtual teaching labs and this has led toarguments on the pros and cons of using virtual labs in place of physical labs. Mosterman et al.[1] argued that virtual laboratories
79% Fall 2020 December 2020 6 7 86% Fall 2021 December 2021 7 8 88% Fall 2022 December 2022 6 8 75%Each fall, after closing the survey, the evaluator downloaded response data from Qualtrcis surveysoftware to Microsoft Excel and analyzed them. To improve validity of the analysis, and tosupport planning and decision-making for the course and the NRT program, results werediscussed during a co-interpretive session with NRT program leaders [16]. Noticeable from theseannual review sessions, was that responses changed little from year to year. For this paper,quantitative data analysis involved
. Figure 2: Desired Cabinet door initial and final positions(a) Design strategy (15 minutes) 1. Develop a design strategy taking safety, cost, space, designand manufacturing simplicity, and aesthetic values into account. The plan should include the useof a gift/soft box to develop the concept proof. 2. Identify the mechanism design approach (twoposition, three position, fixed pivot etc.) © American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 2023 ASEE Midwest Section Conference(b) Perform Mechanism Syntheses (15 minutes) Perform the mechanism synthesis on a papershowing each position and construction lines for the supervisor’s verification.(c) Develop the prototype (15 minutes) Using the available
2023 ASEE Midwest Section Conference Promoting Collaboration and Team Building through "Fair Game" Problem-Based Exercise Yimesker Yihun1 and Lena Lamei2 1 Wichita State University, 2 Carolina University,AbstractCollaboration among team members is essential for the success of semester-long projects,especially for students who are not familiar with each other, especially in their early academicyears. To address this challenge, this study proposes an innovative approach called "Fair Game"for professors to facilitate relationship building, identify individual strengths, and create plans forteam success. The
about post-high school plans. The pre-and post-surveys asked participants about their career interests or anticipated majors.Parts of the Knowledge, Awareness, and Motivations (KAM) survey tool were modified toevaluate awareness, exposure, career interest, and motivations. The KAM survey is a modifiedversion of the Motivation and Exposure in Microelectronics Instrument [6], an instrumentderived from the Nanotechnology Awareness Instrument [7]. The instrument was initiallydeveloped to assess changes in awareness, exposure, motivation, and knowledge ofnanotechnology [7]. To measure students’ self-efficacy and career outcome expectations, weadministered a modified Social Cognitive Career Theory Survey (SCCT) [8]. TheMicroelectronics SCCT Survey
Paper ID #43336Assessment and Impact of a Clinical Observations and Needs Finding Courseon Biomedical Engineering Education OutcomesMs. Jacquelynn Ann Horsey, University of Arkansas Jacquelynn is an undergraduate student in the Department of Biomedical Engineering.Thomas Hudnall McGehee, University of Arkansas Thomas ”Hud” McGehee is an undergraduate student in the Department of Biomedical Engineering. While Hud’s primary research focus is on nanocomposite biomaterials for orthopedic applications, engineering education prevails as another area of interest. Hud plans to pursue higher education by utilizing his engineering
Preuss, EdD, is the Co-founder and Lead Consultant for Exquiri Consulting, LLC. His primary focus is providing assistance to grant project teams in planning and development, through external evaluation, and as publication support. Most of his workDr. Matthew Lucian Alexander P.E., Texas A&M University, Kingsville Dr. Alexander graduated with a BS in Engineering Science from Trinity University, a MS in Chemical Engineering from Georgia Tech, and a PhD in Chemical Engineering from Purdue University. He worked for 25 years in environmental engineering consulting befMr. Rajashekar Reddy Mogiligidda, Texas A&M University, Kingsville Rajashekar Mogiligidda is working as a Lecturer in the department of Mechanical and
-routinized plans for mathematical education. students make and the need for problem-solving. flexibility in problem-solving. [46] Student-generated everyday examples Identified codes related to vector Limited direct relevance to for basis and their use of metaphors relations and characteristics in engineering students; more like travel and building in everyday examples. suited for mathematics understanding vector spaces. education. [47] Student reasoning about linear Identified hub concepts like More applicable to
education, STEM education, and educational psychology. She has also served as a PI, co-PI, advisory board member, or external evaluator on several NSF-funded projects. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Exploring Intervention Research in Statics Courses: A Systematic Review ofASEE Publications from 2013 to 2023AbstractStatics is a foundational subject for many engineering students, exposing students tomathematics and physics of design and planning settings, which is vital for mechanical, civil,and aerospace engineers. This study systematically collected, analyzed, and reviewed the mostrecent 10-year ASEE conference papers about interventions in Statics courses. A total of 37papers were selected
College Student; and Second-LanguageEnglish Speaker. The survey also captured Gender; Sexual Orientation; Ethnic and Racialidentities, using National Institute of Health (NIH) definitions for gender, orientation, ethnicityand race. All identity dimensions included an option to “decline to answer,” and it was rarelyused. The fine-grained approach to demography here was in part motivated by plans to scale thesurvey instrument to a much larger project that leverages key Sociology expertise by members ofthe research team.d. Proximity to VeteransProximity to veterans correlated with the respondents’ personal connections to veterans.Respondents identified their immediate family contacts as well as their distant family oracquaintances. The data also
improvetechnician assembly and transportation time as well as reduce bulk on the system.During her initial work on the project, the plan was for her to design, develop, and test a newsensor enclosure. However, she found an issue with overheating of the sensor that wasunexpected both by her and her mentor. Her mentor then encouraged her to explore this issuefurther. This prompt to explore the unexpected problem provided Evelyn an opportunity to applydivergent thinking in troubleshooting the problem: “I remember when some of these issues started, specifically when the printed circuit board (PCB) started overheating, I immediately turned off the equipment and I had written down all my observations to see what exactly was going on, if there