positive interdependence is essential to collaboration. They definepositive interdependence as an individual’s recognition that their own goals can only be achievedif people they are cooperating with also achieve their goals in the collaborative endeavor. Thus, to help engineering students learn to collaborate effectively, educators must helpthem to (1) realize that their personal method of learning is not the only means to insight; (2)learn to respect alternative learning methods used by others; and (3) integrate new methods oflearning into the collaboration12. Advocates of collaborative learning recommend that instructorscreate scaffolds that offer students cognitive prompts for processes and models that supportinteractions between the
Session: 1139 The Role of Engineering Economics in the Chemical Engineering Curriculum Michael L. Mavrovouniotis Chemical Engineering Department , Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208AbstractEngineering economics is an integral part of the senior design course in all Chemical Engineeringcurricula. The main topics normally covered include cost estimation (focused on chemical processequipment), the time value of money, and profitability measures. This paper offers a commentary on theimportance and future role of engineering economics. Many topics of engineering economics display
, or MathCad, or … Systematic and sustained use of thecomputational environment is central, no matter what the specific selection might be.Currently, the authors of this paper are engaged in an interdisciplinary collaboration to foster andpromote course-level integration of MATLAB into most undergraduate engineering majors, witha long-term goal of curriculum-level integration. Our efforts have included faculty quick-startseminars in MATLAB basics, providing assistance to faculty who are developing homework Page 12.1587.2assignments that use MATLAB, beginning the development of a library of web-available “HowTo” screen movies showing specific
Paper ID #31094Computational Modeling in Introductory Physics Courses and Across theCurriculumDr. Todd Zimmerman, University of Wisconsin - Stout Todd Zimmerman is an associate professor of physics in the Department of Chemistry and Physics at the University of Wisconsin - Stout. He is also the editor-in-chief of the Partnership for Integrating Computation Into the Undergraduate Curriculum. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Computational Modeling in Introductory Physics Courses and Across the Curriculum Todd A. Zimmerman
, University of Michigan Lisa Lattuca, Professor of Higher Education and member of the Core Faculty in the Engineering Education Research Program at the University of Michigan. She studies curriculum, teaching, and learning in college and university settings, particularly how facDr. Joi-Lynn Mondisa, University of Michigan Joi Mondisa is an Associate Professor in the Department of Industrial and Operations Engineering and an Engineering Education Faculty Member at the University of Michigan Ann Arbor.Dr. Erika Mosyjowski, University of Michigan Erika Mosyjowski is the Research and Faculty Engagement Manager in the Center for Socially Engaged Design within University of Michigan College of Engineering. She earned a PhD and
Session 2147 Developing Communication Effectiveness in a Freshman Electrical Engineering Technology Curriculum Robert J. Hofinger Purdue University, Columbus, INAbstractThe ability to communicate effectively is expected of all college graduates. The ability to presenttechnical concepts and write good reports distinguishes an outstanding technologist from anaverage one. Feedback from our industrial board indicated that writing should form an integralpart of an electrical engineering technologist’s education. The goal of graduating electricalengineering technologists
Paper ID #7754Sophomore-Level Curriculum Innovation in Electrical and Computer Engi-neeringDr. Cordelia M Brown, Purdue University, West Lafayette Cordelia M. Brown is an Assistant Professor in Electrical and Computer Engineering, and Engineering Education at Purdue University. She received her Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering at Vanderbilt Univer- sity, her M.S. in Electrical Engineering at Vanderbilt University, and her B.S. in Electrical Engineering at Tuskegee University. Her research interests include assessment of instructional methods, laboratory design, collaborative learning, and retention and recruitment issues in
AC 2011-2282: A SPIRAL LEARNING CURRICULUM FOR SECOND YEARSTUDENTS IN MECHANICAL ENGINEERINGDr. R. Roemer, University of UtahDebra J. Mascaro, University of Utah Debra J. Mascaro is the Director of Undergraduate Studies in Mechanical Engineering at the University of Utah. She holds a B.A. in Physics from Gustavus Adolphus College in St. Peter, MN and a Ph.D. in Materials Science and Engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. She teaches freshman design and senior-/graduate-level classes in microscale engineering and organic electronics.Eric R. Pardyjak, University of Utah Eric Pardyjak is currently an associate professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Utah. He received his B.S
(one three-credit junior design and two four-credit senior design courses,all five hours long).Finally, at Boston University, students graduate with a bachelor of science in a single discipline,biomedical engineering, while at Wentworth they will major in two disciplines as at TuftsUniversity, though at a more integrated and a broader level.Worcester Polytechnic Institute:Worcester Polytechnic Institute6 offers an accredited undergraduate program in biomedicalengineering. This program, like Boston University’s, suffers from being a specialized biomedicalengineering program, which limits student career opportunities in other areas of engineering. Inaddition, only one quarter of a four-credit capstone senior design course is required and there
well-rounded engineeringtechnology program. However, since feedback control systems tends to be a rather complextopic, students react positively to hands-on experiments that assist them visualize control systemsin practical situations, and, in today’s technology, utilizing and integrating computers within thecontrol loop is essential. An innovative feedback control laboratory has been developed in theschool of engineering technology at Daytona State College to fill this need. The laboratory isequipped with some of the most frequently used control systems in engineering and industry. It isdesigned to bridge the gap between theory and real-life problems, and to give the studentsvaluable hands-on experience to help them better prepared for their
in fracture at a specified location in the part material. Unfortunately, a simplemodeling approach could not be found that yielded reasonable convergence and clear results.Therefore, this exercise, too, was deemed beyond the current level of the Tool Engineeringcourse.III. ImplementationThe new curriculum design with FEM lecture and exercise material was integrated into theSpring 2000 offering of Tool Engineering at Cal Poly. 10 students were enrolled in the class andall participated in the new material. Approximately 3 hours of lecture time were used to presentthe FEM material described above. Only one of the computer exercises was assigned (#1 above)because the others were not in a completed state at the time of the offering. About an hour
just before and just after the tutorial indicates that the tutorial is effective inshowing the importance of understanding how to acquire data and that students appreciation ofthe process is more evident to seniors. This is not an indication that the material would be best Page 25.377.8introduced in the senior year. Instead, it is interpreted as an indication that its value is moreobvious to those who have been through the bulk of their undergraduate program.These results motivate a proposal for a holistic integration of data acquisition into the mechanicalengineering undergraduate curriculum. The details of this integration are the
Paper ID #12073Towards a T Shaped Electrical and Computer Engineering Curriculum: aVertical and Horizontally Integrated Laboratory/Lecture ApproachDr. Harry Courtney Powell, University of Virginia Harry Powell is an Associate Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering in the Charles L. Brown Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Virginia. After receiving a Bach- elor’s Degree in Electrical Engineering in1978 he was an active research and design engineer, focusing on automation, embedded systems, remote control, and electronic/mechanical co-design techniques, holding 16 patents in these
to remotelymonitor the structural integrity of a truss metal bridge model. Triple axes accelerometers areattached to the trusses of the bridge such that the vibrations due to the bridge movements can betransmitted wirelessly using 2.4 GHz signals. The system then collects and analyzes the signalswith a receiver attached to a computer. Data logging of the bridge vibrations is implementedusing a multi-sensor data link to routinely collect the normal waveform patterns when an impulseimpact is applied to the bridge. Using the Fast Fourier transform MATLAB program, analysis ofthe waveforms yields a definite shift in the characteristic signature, when one or more of thebridge truss joints are intentionally compromised. Consequently, this simple
use in industry.Due to changes in the professional practice of civil engineering, updates to what is taught withinthe civil engineering curriculum are needed.2,3 This is in part due to the abilities of computers toconduct computations much more efficiently than in the past.3 Graduates from structuralengineering programs with considerable computer usage4 have an employment advantage overtheir peers since they tend to be more productive in industrial positions immediately aftergraduation. In most civil engineering programs, computer software use is introduced into thecurriculum directly through discipline specific courses. The literature presents numerousexamples of computer usage and software implementation in discipline specific courses.5,6,7
widespread in industry, however it is not widespread incomputer science education. According to a corporate survey, the 13th Annual State of AgileReport[1], “97% of respondents report their organizations practices agile development methods.”This development process is a missing skill set for most computer science undergraduatesentering industry. Given the nature and scope of most coursework, undergraduate computerscience students naturally learn to develop using a waterfall design process which is an antithesisto agile software development processes. Studies have shown that active learning promoteslearning[2], so this work integrates active techniques to completely focus the course on thereal-world engineering process using agile methods. Ultimately
5 Figure 2. Systems Engineering Competencies Many of the courses in the distributed grouped into SE Concentrations. curriculum have an option of being taken for graduate credit; our guidelines stress,however, that it is extremely unlikely that a series of courses taken from different providers canbe integrated together into a graduate degree granted by an academic institution. If a student hasa goal of obtaining a Master’s degree in Systems Engineering or a related field, one or twocourses may be transferable into a formal Masters program.Proceedings of the 2008 American Society for Engineering Education Pacific Southwest Annual Conference Copy
CurriculumA critical statement in the IS 2002 emphasizes that an IS curriculum requires an embeddedproblem solving and critical thinking framework in all courses2. Even though many institutionsagree that critical thinking and problem solving are important, their integration in the curriculumhas been limited1,3. Indeed, the problem-solving component is mainly addressed in programmingcourses. Consequently, students associate problem solving concepts with programming and donot think of problem solving outside this context.The proposed model curriculum emphasizes problem solving in all IS courses. Furthermore,critical thinking skills are emphasized in general education courses, which is an ABETrequirement5. In the implementation of the model curriculum
development of this curriculum has been iterative andwill likely continue to be so. There is an immediate plan to include an alternate path within thefreshman year including marketing and graphic design. The concept here is to enable thestudents less interest in hands-on manufacturing to develop an alternate skill set thatcomplements the manufacturing skill set. For the second half of the course the freshmanstudents from both training options would be integrated into project groups for better-roundedteams. Introduction of the innovative design process at the freshman level has been proposed,developing an innovative mindset earlier while allowing the students to repeat the process andimprove their understanding at the sophomore level.The long term
group in 1994.JERRY M. FINEJerry Fine graduated from Rice University with B.A. and M.M.E. degrees in 1971. After serving as an aviator withthe U.S. Navy until 1978, he began graduate studies in the Texas Institute for Computational Mechanics at theUniversity of Texas at Austin. He was awarded the Ph.D. in 1984, specializing in numerical methods for solvingsystems of ordinary differential equations. He came to Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology in 1986. Since comingto Rose-Hulman, he has been involved with a number of innovations in engineering education, including thedevelopment of the Integrated First Year Curriculum in Science, Engineering and Mathematics, and the FoundationCoalition Sophomore Engineering Curriculum
.[9] Kimmel, H., Rockland, R., Hirsch, L., Carpinelli, J, and Burr-Alexander, L. (2011). Medibotics: An EngineeringProgram for Integration into High School Curriculum. Proceedings of the 2011 International Conference onEngineering Education, Ulster, Northern Ireland, August.[10] Hirsch, L.S., Carpinelli, J., Kimmel, H., Rockland, R., and Burr-Alexander, L. (2009). The impact ofintroducing robotics in middle and high school science and mathematics classrooms, Proceedings of the 2009 ASEEAnnual Conference, Austin, TX, June.[11] Kimmel, H., Carpinelli, J., Burr-Alexander, l., Hirsch, L.S., and Rockland, R. (2008). .IntroducingRobotics into the Secondary Science Classrooms Proceedings of the 19th International SITE Conference,pp. 4189-4194, Las
Division Forum. Dr. Furterer is an author or co-author of several academic journal articles, conference proceedings and 4 reference textbooks on Lean Six Sigma, Design for Six Sigma and Lean Systems, Lean Six Sigma Case Studies in the Healthcare Enterprise. She is a co-editor for the ASQ Certified Quality Improvement Asso- ciate Handbook (2020), and the ASQ Certified Manager of Quality / Organizational Excellence Handbook (2020). American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Incorporating a Unique Lean Six Sigma Learning Experience by Integrating Graduate and Undergraduate Students Across Two Lean Six Sigma Courses in the Engineering Technology and
and construction management, sustainable design and construction, building information modeling, project management practices, and engineering educational research methods. He is an active member of ASCE and ASEE. Page 24.459.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Effectiveness of Green-BIM Teaching Method in Construction Education Curriculum Jin-Lee Kim Department of Civil Engineering & Construction Engineering Management California State University at Long
programs insustainability. In addition to the lesson, sustainability concepts are incorporated into theintegrated design project. The project each semester is selected to require an integrated teamfrom several sub-disciplines of civil engineering to coordinate and conduct the design. A specificobjective of the integrated team is to address sustainability broadly and also directly related tothe design. Most often an individual or a sub-team is tasked with the sustainability objective.Another element incorporating sustainability in the civil engineering curriculum at the Universityof ____ is a senior-level technical elective course that was developed four years ago to provide acomplete coverage in sustainable design practices14. The course is
Applications in Engineering Education, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 514–526, 2015.[12] P. Buckley and E. Doyle, “Individualising gamification: An investigation of the impact of learning styles and personality traits on the efficacy of gamification using a prediction market,” Computers & Education, vol. 106, pp. 43–55, 2017.[13] J. Suriano, D. Sosa, and D. Brateris, “Formalization of Functional Prototyping Via Makerspace Integration into University Curriculum,” IJAMM, 2024.[14] V. Gonzalez, O. Perez, and R. Romero, “Cybersecurity in ECE curriculum, an expanded collaboration program to disseminate real security experiences in cyber-physical systems,” in 2023 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), IEEE, 2023, pp. 1–4.[15] C. Kimpton
education credit hours, certificate programs offered by a number of content providers,and professional certification through organizations that offer industry-recognized standards inareas related to Systems Engineering.6Many of the courses in the distributed curriculum have an option of being taken for graduatecredit; our guidelines stress, however, that it is extremely unlikely that a series of courses takenfrom different providers can be integrated together into a graduate degree granted by anacademic institution. If a student has a goal of obtaining a Master’s degree in SystemsEngineering or a related field, one or two courses may be transferable into a formal Mastersprogram
Paper ID #26507Board 96: Designing a Middle Grades Spatial Skills Curriculum in MinecraftDr. Nicholas Lux Lux, Montana State University Dr. Nicholas Lux has is an Associate Professor of Curriculum and Instruction in MSU’s Department of Education. His teaching and research interests are in the area of educational technology. He has worked in the fields of K-12 and higher education for 18 years, and currently teaches in the Montana State University Teacher Education Program. He has experience in educational technology theory and practice in K-12 contexts and teacher education, with a focus on STEM teaching and learning
AC 2012-3865: AN INTERACTIVE K-12 ENGINEERING CURRICULUMDEVELOPMENT ON RENEWABLE SOURCES AND ENERGY STORAGEAND IN POWER SYSTEMSJana Sebestik, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Jana Sebestik received a B.S. in mathematics and M.Ed. in mathematics education from the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. She has 34 years of classroom experience teaching mathematics in grades 7-12. She is currently a curriculum specialist at the Office for Mathematics, Science, and Technology Education (MSTE) in the College of Education at the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, and Education Lead for Trustworthy Cyber Infrastructure for the Power Grid (TCIPG). MSTE works with mathematics and science teachers to
4th, 5th, and 6th grade studentsover a period of two years in several school districts across Missouri. We surveyed 129 studentswith pre- and post-instruments. We found that students reported high positive attitudes towardmath and science. Males and females did not differ in attitudes toward math and science. Toassist teachers with understanding the relatively new engineering and science standards, we areadding specific standards to the curricula. We provide such an overview of standards below forboth engineering and neuroscience. We also note that the comparative theme of human(brain/body) and artificial (Lego) robotics used in the curriculum is not only interdisciplinary andengaging, but also enables inclusion of science, mathematics
: Term project completed with theLEGO NXT, this robotic arm was interfaced Amigobot. The cameral was used for obstaclewith another LEGO NXT mobile robot to avoidance and path following.perform coordinated tasks using wirelesscommunications.These modules can be used in a variety of undergraduate ECE courses at our institution, none ofwhich has an existing experimental component to it. The experimental modules are designed tocompliment the material covered in the class.3. AssessmentThe goal of this instructional approach is to improve student understanding of fundamental andcomplex engineering concepts with the integration of the experiments in selected courses. Asummative and formative assessment model will be used. To this end, both quantitative