students’ digital literacies and assessment. Recently, Dr. Hsu has received a seed grant at UML to investigate how undergradu- ate engineering students’ digital inequalities and self-directed learning characteristics (e.g., self-efficacy) affect their learning outcomes in a virtual laboratory environment during the COVID-19 pandemic. Dr. Hsu’s research interests include advanced quantitative design and analysis and their applications in STEM education, large-scale assessment data (e.g., PISA), and engineering students’ perception of faculty en- couragement and mentoring.Dr. Yanfen Li, University of Massachusetts Lowell Yanfen Li is an Assistant Teaching Professor at the University of Massachusetts Lowell. She received
projects could be replaced with two lectures and two homeworkassignments, with a lower teaching load but different learning outcomes.In addition to the time requirements, there is a significant increase in stress and apparentworkload from the expectations from the client and the larger community that the SL projects Page 11.879.13will be a success. For all these reasons, the instructor reports feeling “burnt out” after thecompletion of the projects. Possible reductions in workload may be achieved through theaddition of the engineering workshop and technical laboratory instructor, additional training andearlier recruitment of teaching assistants to
University (1995), and he earned his M.S. (1998) in environmental health engineering and his Ph.D. (2002) from the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. He has completed postgraduate coursework in Microbial Ecology from the Marine Biology Laboratory, Environmental Health from the University of Cincinnati, Public Health from The Johns Hopkins University, and Public Administration from Indiana University, Bloomington. Oerther is a licensed Professional Engineer (PE) in DC, MO, and OH. He is Board Certified in Envi- ronmental Engineering (BCEE) by the American Academy of Environmental Engineers and Scientist (AAEES), registered as a Chartered Engineer (CEng) by the U.K. Engineering Council, recognized as a Diplomate
engineering education.Dr. James Ledlie Klosky P.E., United States Military Academy Led Klosky is a Professor of Civil Engineering at the United States Military Academy at West Point and a past winner of ASEE’s National Teaching Medal. He is a licensed professional engineer and the Dean’s Executive Agent for Design and Construction at West Point. Led’s work is primarily in the areas of infrastructure, subsurface engineering and engineering education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Deliberate Development of Creative EngineersABSTRACTThe ability of engineers to create and innovate is an essential part of delivering design value. Theengineering profession has made this
thestudents. By design, CMs also offer flexibility for students to explore the relationships betweencourse and lived experiences, offering assessment opportunities to determine what students bringinto a course and what they take with them as they progress through the curriculum. Further,concept mapping is widely accepted as encouraging improved learning experiences incomparison to, or in conjunction with, traditional teaching methods [2]. However, concept maps are less well understood as an approach to understandknowledge acquisition and competency for representing complex and dynamic interactionsbetween socio-cultural and technological systems. . a static body of knowledge from a textbook.Learning assessments are confounded by such ambiguity
Staticsconcepts from the previous class, and the rest of the class is assigned for a highly visualized andinteractive type of lecture, and other course activities described in the course (syllabus).B. Motivations behind selecting this target domainMany teachers who teach Statics are disappointed regarding the inability of their students inapplying the learned concepts in analyzing and designing the real world problems in succeedingcourses for which Statics is considered as a cornerstone (Condoor et al., 2008). Based on theauthor's experience in teaching the subject topic, students normally struggle learning Statics, asmost of the time their main focus is on memorizing the mathematical modules and equationsused for solving the problems, while they miss
Course Modification Team, chair for the LTU Leadership Curriculum Committee, supervisor of the LTU Thermo-Fluids Laboratory, coordinator of the Certificate/Minor in Aeronautical Engineering, and faculty advisor of the LTU SAE Aero Design Team.Dr. Donald D. Carpenter, Lawrence Technological University Donald D. Carpenter, PhD, PE, LEED AP is Professor of Civil Engineering at Lawrence Technological University where he teaches courses on ethics/professionalism and water resources. Dr. Carpenter has served as the University Director of Assessment and the founding Director of the Center for Teaching and Learning. He conducts funded pedagogical research and development projects, has published numerous engineering education
Paper ID #22728Undergraduate Engineering Students’ Use of Metaphor in Presenting Proto-types to a Technical and Non-technical Public AudienceMr. Jared David Berezin, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Jared Berezin is a Lecturer in the Writing, Rhetoric, and Professional Communication (WRAP) program within the Comparative Media Studies/Writing Department at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Jared teaches in a range of communication-intensive courses at MIT, including Communicating Science to the Public, Product Design, Flight Vehicle Design, Environmental Engineering, and Nuclear Science. He has also been a
, mentoring, as well as connecting students to high impact practices such as undergraduate research and internships. She is particularly interested in the evolving patterns of STEM student pathways including community college transfers and exploring institutional partnership initiatives that provide innovative approaches responsive to student needs.Dr. Nancy A Rodenborg, Augsburg University Dr. Nancy Rodenborg is a Professor of Social Work at Augsburg University in Minneapolis. Dr. Ro- denborg’s primary research and teaching focus is on institutional diversity and inequality in a global context. She is interested in developing inclusive pedagogy and higher education administrative practices that equitably serve students of
AC 2012-4652: IS THE ENGINEERING EDUCATION COMMUNITY BE-COMING MORE INTERDISCIPLINARY?Dr. Johannes Strobel, Purdue University, West Lafayette Johannes Strobel is Director of INSPIRE, Institute for P-12 Engineering Research and Learning, and Assistant Professor of engineering education and learning design and technology at Purdue University. NSF and several private foundations fund his research. His research and teaching focuses on policy of P-12 engineering, how to support teachers and students’ academic achievements through engineering learning, the measurement and support of change of habits of mind, particularly in regards to sustainability and the use of cyber-infrastructure to sensitively and resourcefully
at two- and four-yearcolleges and universities located within the mountain region of the U.S. As of the 2003-2004academic year, 40 of the 185 schools in the region were teaching at least one course intransportation; 36 of these were four-year institutions. A total of 32 of the 40 institutions wereoffering a degree in a transportation-related field. The combined results of three differentsurveys of transportation professionals, each performed by other researchers, along with inputfrom the author, identified a set of 15 essential topics to be covered in a comprehensivetransportation education program. None of the institutions in the study region were offeringcourses in all 15 areas, but four schools were covering over 50% of the essential
address workforce needs and professionaldevelopment of EMS students, and 3) enhancing public teachers’ ability to teach mathematics,science and technology. The program has developed several collaborativeinitiatives/partnerships with two-year post-secondary institutes statewide and with public schoolsfor the purposes of increasing the participation rate of New Mexicans in post-secondaryeducation by increasing the number of statewide public schools that participate in thesecollaborative efforts.I. IntroductionThe MEMS recruitment and retention program consists of seven core components: I) A SummerBridge Program, for 50 topnotch high-school students admitted and planning to enroll at UNMin the Fall. This intensive four-week program
Session 2630 Comparing Design Team Self-Reports with Actual Performance: Cross-Validating Assessment Instruments Robin Adams1, Pimpida Punnakanta 1, Cynthia J. Atman 1,2, Craig D. Lewis 1 Center for Engineering Learning and Teaching 2 Department of Industrial Engineering University of WashingtonAssessing student learning of the engineering design process is challenging. Students’ ability to answer testquestions about the design process or record
- tion.In particular, we are extending MEA implementation and complementary student and faculty as-sessments across our partner institutions; broadening the library of usable MEAs to different en-gineering disciplines; and extending the MEA approach to identifying and repairing misconcep-tions, using laboratory experiments as an integrated component, and introducing an ethical deci-sion-making dimension [1-5].Our overall research goal is to enhance problem solving and modeling skills and conceptuallearning of engineering students through the use of model eliciting activities. In order to accom-plish this goal at the University of Pittsburgh, we are pursuing two main research routes: MEAsas teaching tools and MEA as learning assessment tools. Under
and biological systems. She has published over 20 technical articles and presented her research in over 80 national meetings. Her research is funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF), the National Institutes of health (NIH) and 3M. She is currently teaching the ”Introduction to Cellular Bioengineering” and the ”Unified Systems Bioengineering I” courses.Dr. Fatin Aliah Phang, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia Fatin Aliah Phang graduated from the University of Cambridge with a M.Phil. in educational research and a Ph.D. in education. Phang’s research area is in physics education, focusing on problem solving and metacognition. Phang is a lecturer in the faculty of education, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM
describe the structureof the course as a whole, provide detailed descriptions of two units in the course to illustrate howcomputational models can be used to teach core MSE concepts, and discuss how this approachdiffers from the traditional approach.1 Background: computation in MSE, ABM in education, and learning theories1.1 Computation in MSEComputational materials science and engineering (MSE) dates to at least the 1980s, and in thepast 20 years the MSE community has begun to recognize the crucial importance ofcomputational tools in accelerating the development, discovery, and design of new materials.There is widespread consensus among academics, national labs, and industry that computationwill play an increasingly important role in MSE and that
Paper ID #43928Promoting Equity and Cognitive Growth: The Influence of an AuthenticLearning Assignment on Engineering Problem-Solving SkillsDr. Boni Frances Yraguen, Vanderbilt University Boni Yraguen is an Instructional Consultant with the Vanderbilt Center for Teaching. Boni is passionate about engineering education. She has led and participated in various educational studies on the impact of student reflections, authentic learning assignments, the use of technology in the classroom, and graduate education.Elisa Koolman, University of Texas at Austin Elisa is a Ph. D. student at the University of Texas at Austin. They
pollinators. His educational research interests include effective teaching techniques for enhancing engineering education, global engineering and international perspectives, thinking and working in multi-, inter-, and transdisciplinary ways, cyberlearning and cyber-environments, service and experiential learning, mentoring, peer-mentoring, teaming and collaborative learning.Prof. Reginald F. Hamilton, Pennsylvania State UniversityDr. Catherine L. Cohan, Pennsylvania State University Catherine Cohan, Ph.D. has been a research psychologist for over 20 years. Her areas of expertise include engineering education, retention of underrepresented students, measurement, and assessment. She is currently an Assistant Research Professor
worked as a postdoctoral fellow with Prof. Janusz Pawliszyn's team at the University of Waterloo (Chemistry) in Canada. His first faculty job was with Texas A&M University Research and Extension, where he practiced engineering and analytical chemistry research at large beef cattle feedlots and swine farms. He enjoys transdisciplinary and multidisciplinary research and teaching, communicating science, mentoring graduate and undergraduate students, team-based learning, peer-reviewing, editorship service at Biosystems Engineering, IJERPH, Atmosphere, and AgriEngineering, publishing on the nexus of Food-Energy-Water.Deanne MeyerAnand PadmanabhanSamuel Powers ReedRiveraine Walters Riveraine Walters (they/she) is an
divergent and convergent thinking as well as through deep needs and community assessments using design ethnography, and translating those strategies to design tools and education. She teaches design and en- trepreneurship courses at the undergraduate and graduate levels, focusing on front-end design processes.Dr. Sara Lynn Hoffman, University of MichiganProf. Kathleen H. Sienko, University of Michigan Kathleen H. Sienko is an Arthur F. Thurnau Professor, Miller Faculty Scholar, and Associate Profes- sor in the Departments of Mechanical and Biomedical Engineering at the University of Michigan. She earned her Ph.D. in Medical Engineering and Bioastronautics from the Harvard-Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Division
publications. Evelyn is not only outstanding in teaching and research, but also in service. She recently received the 2013 Chair’s Award for Outstanding Service in the Department of Computer System Tech- nology.Ms. Nina Exner, North Carolina Agricultural & Technical State University Nina Exner is a research librarian at North Carolina Agricultural & Technical State University and a doctoral pre-candidate in information science at UNC-CH. Her research and publishing history centers around researcher emergence, practitioner-researcher information needs, and mentoring.Dr. Sherry F AbernathyDr. Rajeev K Agrawal, North Carolina A&T State University Dr. Rajeev Agrawal has been teaching in the Department of Computer
coursemodel traverses from one location in time and space to another.Background: Replication vs. Mutation of the Wright State Model for EngineeringMathematics EducationThe Wright State Model (WSM) is a semester-long math course that teaches fundamentalconcepts of Calculus 1, 2, 3, and Differential Equations in an engineering context through hands-on laboratory experiences and application-rich problems. The WSM is designed to disrupt thetraditional rigid sequencing of undergraduate engineering curricula by decoupling mathematicsprerequisites from engineering coursework—introducing undergraduates to sufficientmathematical tools in the one-semester course to enable them to get started and make progress intechnical engineering coursework, regardless of
then, she has been a professor of electrical engineering at Ecole de technologie sup´erieure ´ (ETS), where she teaches undergraduate courses in algorithms, biomedical instrumentation and medical imaging. Her research focuses on medical ultrasound image analysis, and aims to address problems re- lating to image acquisition, image segmentation and registration, 3D reconstruction, tracking and shape analysis using statistical methods. As an adjunct researcher at Sainte-Justine Hospital Research Cen- tre, she is currently developing applications of ultrasound image analysis for non-invasive follow-up of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and the analysis of tongue motion for the study of speech production
member, inviting a speaker to discuss gender equity issues specificto the discipline, or sending a faculty member to recruiting trips, among other activities. Finally,the ADVANCE director also had additional funding to recognize the department that made themost progress on the gender equity goals, by hiring or developing programming to supportdiverse faculty, based on their plan.Fifth, Acker argues, given that gender is embedded within power/class structures, evenindividuals who support gender equity may not want to make the associated changes to theunderlying power/class structure. One significant gendered power/class structure is the type offaculty appointment. Academic appointments include tenure-track faculty members withresearch, teaching
Paper ID #18703A Symbiotic Solution for Facilitating Faculty Transitions in Engineering AcademiaDr. Comas Lamar Haynes, Georgia Tech Research Institute Comas Lamar Haynes is a Principal Research Engineer / faculty member of the Georgia Tech Research In- stitute and Joint Faculty Appointee at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory. His research includes modeling steady state and transient behavior of advanced energy systems, inclusive of their thermal management, and the characterization and optimization of novel cycles. He has advised graduate and undergradu- ate research assistants and has received multi-agency funding for
engineering degrees and is typically characterized by small groups of students (class sizes of 5-50). Students can begin the engineering curriculum as early as first semester freshman year. Private/Faith Based (Masters L): A small teaching institution in the Pacific Northwest of 4,000 students, whose mission emphasizes building graduates of competence and character by providing tools of rigorous learning and modeling a grace-filled community. This institution offers four engineering and computer science majors that are based on and informed by a Christian world view. Class sizes typically range from 15-20. Research (RU/VH): A large research institution and flagship university in the Pacific
Paper ID #9669A Multidisciplinary MOOC on Creativity, Innovation, and Change: Encour-aging Experimentation and Experiential Learning on a Grand ScaleDr. Kathryn Jablokow, Pennsylvania State University Dr. Kathryn Jablokow is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering and Engineering Design at Penn State University. A graduate of Ohio State University (Ph.D., Electrical Engineering), Dr. Jablokow’s teaching and research interests include problem solving, invention, and creativity in science and engineer- ing, as well as robotics and computational dynamics. In addition to her membership in ASEE, she is a Senior
with the REU project team, but with other graduate students, staff,and faculty members working in the structural engineering laboratories. The bi-weekly reportswere promptly critiqued by the Project Director and returned. A suggested outline and detailedinstruction for preparing the final report was given to the students at the end of the third week ofthe project. Using the bi-weekly reports and this outline, the students prepared the final projectTechnical Report. Thus, the whole REU Site provided an insight to the participants on the issues andconcerns with design, manufacture, testing and data synthesis of a range of different structuralengineering research projects. The work accomplished by the participants in each of theseprojects
AC 2011-2181: RE-DESIGNING CAPSTONE DESIGN: TWO YEARS OFEXPERIENCECameron J Turner, Colorado School of Mines Dr. Cameron Turner is an Assistant Professor of Engineering at the Colorado School of Mines where he runs the Design Innovation and Computational Engineering Laboratory. At CSM he teaches undergradu- ate and graduate courses in engineering design and is a member of the Senior Design Leadership group. Dr. Turner is currently the course coordinator for the Engineering Capstone Design program and is active in the Computers and Information in Engineering Division of ASME. Page 22.1213.1
-sessments across our partner institutions; broadening the library of usable MEAs to different en-gineering disciplines; and extending the MEA approach to identifying and repairing misconcep-tions, using laboratory experiments as an integrated component, and introducing an ethical deci-sion-making dimension [1, 2].Our overall research goal is to enhance problem solving and modeling skills and conceptuallearning of engineering students through the use of model eliciting activities. In order to accom-plish this goal at the University of Pittsburgh, we are pursuing two main research routes: MEAsas teaching tools and MEA as learning assessment tools. Under the first – using MEAs as ateaching tool – we are focused on three main activities: Development