of professional registration.Another level of accountability in engineering are codes and standards which provide accountabilityfor a given task, especially for engineers not professionally registered. If engineers do not followthese guidelines or topics and the result is a failure that causes loss of property and/or life, the legalsystem is always ready to hold engineers accountable. In addition to the external accountability thatexists for engineers, there is also an internal, personal accountability that exists. Internalizing theprofessional code of ethics is a start. Many people have other systems by which they live as well.Religion plays a big part in this role, whether it be Hinduism, Buddhism, Islam, Confucianism,Christianity, Taoism
Making in American Politics; Phase II—Decision Making in Engineering and Science;Phase III—Ethical Issues in Engineering and Policy. Interspersed throughout these three phaseswould be the laboratory component whereby students would meet with legislators and heads ofstate government agencies, such as transportation, environment and water, at the StateLegislative Building and government offices in surrounding areas.Phase IStudents were introduced to some of the fundamentals of the policy process from the socialscience perspective through an exploration of various decision-making models. We drew uponBrower and Abolafia’s “Bureaucratic Politics: The View from Below,” [1] which builds upon thesocial science gold standard—Graham Allison’s Conceptual
-specified outcomes and provides consistency for the general education of undergraduateprograms at Purdue university. Furthermore, the course aligns with the requirements of commonconstruction-related accreditation bodies, such as the American Council for ConstructionEducation (ACCE) [6] and the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET)[7], by providing discussions related to ethics and risk management.The course is a lecture-based, 3-credit hour course. Two one-hour and fifteen-minute lectures perweek were scheduled for the course for the Fall 2022 semester. Through over 29 biweeklyclasses and book discussions, the instructors utilized: (i) architectural history as a background todiscuss the relationship between the changes in
, gain a minimum of four years ofworking experience, and pass two intensive competency exams to earn a P.E. license from theirrespective state's licensure board. One of the main goals of enforcing a P.E. license is to ensureengineering graduates follow ethical responsibility to protect public health, safety, and welfare.Currently, every state regulates the practice of engineering to ensure public safety by grantingonly Professional Engineers (PEs) the authority to sign and seal engineering plans and offer theirservices to the public [10].Historical data to regulate engineering practices in the United States dates back to the early1900s when the state of Wyoming established licensing requirements in 1907 [10]. The country'swestward expansion
toreally grapple with the material effects that environmental contamination can have forcommunities who live in environmental sacrifice zones. Using these concepts in the classroomcan pull students into deep conversations about ethics and responsibility and emphasize the needfor more far-reaching visions of technical communication and community engagement, likethose explored in recent work on Socially Responsible Engineering [5].In this paper, we focus particularly on what we call systems theories and material vibrancy andenchantment theories. For each of these, we offer a synopsis of several key insights, texts, andimplications. Then, we show the utility of the approach in question to advance importantpedagogical goals related to ethics and
student may be appropriate. All students wishingto take this course must also submit an Ethics Agreement to reinforce the ethics expected of acybersecurity professional. An example of a cybersecurity course Ethics Agreement can befound in Appendix A.Learning OutcomesThe Social Engineering course learning outcomes include the following: 1. Explain the various techniques that can be used to complete Social Engineering exploits. 2. Develop an understanding of the psychology of human interaction and how it can be exploited for gain. 3. Learn what technical controls, trainings, and processes can be used to help defend and establish security in-depth to protect against Social Engineering. 4. Overcome uncomfortable feelings such as
as well asemerging engineering fields suited to student interest. Likewise, it is essential to provide asocial, economic and ethical context to application of nanotechnology in manufacturing,medicine, and other contextual areas driving research and development. This provides a uniquechallenge and requires an approach which successfully integrates nanotechnology into currentacademic programs. Such an approach has the added benefit of enhancing student engagementand motivation. The result will be a better educated population of engineers, with anappreciation for the critical importance of nanoscale approaches to solving societal problems. b. Value of active/problem-based approachThere are many references regarding the value of problem
engineeringstudents who were not Calculus-ready and placed into Pre-Calculus. An engineering course wasdeveloped to parallel the material in Pre-Calculus. For example, students applied the conceptslearned regarding linear, power, and exponential equations in Pre-Calculus to applications in theengineering course. A second engineering course to follow this first one was eventuallydeveloped (another paper8 detailed the development of this engineering course sequence). Thefirst engineering course covered engineering design, engineering ethics, and sustainability inengineering. The second engineering course covered spatial visualization skills, engineeringachievements, computer programming basics, and had an engineering design project. Uponcompletion of the
]The civil engineering profession historically has had the highest percentage of licensedengineers. [12] Many job functions require a licensed engineer to seal documents and maintainresponsible charge of projects. This trend continues today as over forty percent of civilengineers are registered. [13] Licensure has continually been associated with the protection ofpublic health, safety, and welfare which aligns very closely with many of the functions of civilengineers. The ASCE and National Society of Professional Engineers (NSPE) codes of ethicssupport licensure and the concept that the civil engineering profession is tied to ethical practicethrough licensure. [14] [15]Is State Licensure Necessary?In recent years there has been a proliferation
Paper ID #22414From ’Empathic Design’ to ’Empathic Engineering’: Toward a Genealogy ofEmpathy in Engineering EducationDr. Xiaofeng Tang, Ohio State University Xiaofeng Tang is an Assistant Professor of Practice in the Department of Engineering Education at the Ohio State University. He worked as a postdoctoral fellow in engineering ethics at Penn State University. He received his Ph.D. in Science and Technology Studies from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 From “Empathic Design” to “Empathic Engineering”: Toward a Genealogy of
of word choices in missionstatements compared across public and private engineering colleges in the United States. Theresearch questions driving this study are: 1. Which words are most frequently used in missionstatements for private and public engineering colleges in the U.S.? 2. For six pre-determinedcategories of interest that each word may represent (eg. related to global, service, pedagogy,research, ethics, and diversity), what similarities and differences are noted in occurrences of eachof the six categories across the two settings of public and private colleges?BackgroundTo help situate this research study, in this section, a discussion drawing from two bodies ofliterature is presented. The first part of this discussion focusses on
solution manuals available whencompleting the homework9. Further, Passow et al. have shown that the decision to cheat or notcan vary depending on the type of assessment11 (homework vs. exam). In general terms, studentsare more likely to cheat on a homework assignment than on an exam. Passow et al. have alsosuggested that students who cheat on homework in their first years of college withoutconsequence may develop skills to allow them to continue to cheat, and on higher-riskassessments such as tests, as they progress through school.Certainly the issue of academic misconduct extends beyond a single course, but due to itsprevalence on homework, impact on learning, and ethical implications it deserves attention inoverall course design. Simply
business and engineering failures, when it is acceptable to take risks, how to recognize signs of impending failure and avoid it, how to examine past personal and corporate failures, learn from them and persist. 15. Resolving Ethical Issues – Defines ethics as a process and argues that the principal reason to behave ethically is to engenders trust. Uses case studies to illustrate how ethical dilemmas arise in engineering, how most engineers respond responsibly, and how a small minority of engineers act irresponsibly. Describes three very different and practical methods for resolving ethical issues. 16. Role of Product in Value Creation – Describes the total product concept, one that introduces a
, where he is also Director of the Minor in Environmental Studies. He received his Ph.D. from U.C. Berkeley and has also been a faculty member at Ohio State University.Thomas Ruehr, California Polytechnic State University Tom Ruehr is a professor in the Earth and Soil Science Department at Cal Poly State University in San Luis Obispo. He has a Ph. D. from Colorado State University. He has received the University Distinguished Teacher award, served the U.S. Department of Agriculture as national co-chairman of the committee for Agricultural Ethics and Public Policy Curriculum Development, and helped lead the U. S. Agency for International Development world conference on Agricultural Systems
of program outcomes (criterion 3) aredifferent for engineering (EAC) and engineering technology (TAC), both lists include topics thatdirectly relate to developing technological literacy in students. Issues such as design withinconstraints, social and ethical issues, and globalization are included on both lists and relate totechnological literacy.This paper will examine both the TAC of ABET and EAC of ABET lists and will highlight areasrelated directly to technological literacy. The paper will explore the concept of technologicalliteracy as a framework for addressing these topics throughout the curriculum and in a specificschool’s or department’s lists of program learning outcomes. This framework has the potentialto be very useful as faculty
water filterand a child’s crutch) using hand tools and scavenged objects. Students experience in a very realway how technical, economic and social considerations are inextricably linked in design.We are working to establish meaningful two-way relationships with communities both locallyand abroad in hopes of creating a community-based project connected to the course. We discusssome of the concerns that have arisen to date and the ethical guidelines we believe are necessary Page 9.643.1for appropriate community collaborations. Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education
and its potential contributions to design excellence areexamined. The concepts of “favorite”, “best in class”, “quintessential” and “designexcellence” are compared and defined. Questions about whether we live in a “claptrap”world are considered.Topics such as “S-Curve” analysis, closed versus open systems and technology pushversus market pull are blended with critiques of DFM/A and QFD to attempt methods ofunderstanding product development methodologies. Ethics in design forms an essentialfinal point of discussion.This paper outlines the course and illustrates its unique nature. Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual
Engineering Education, 2012 Educational Materials Development and Assessment for Engineering History and HeritageAbstractThis paper summarizes the development and the first offering of a new course at Cleveland StateUniversity, ESC 200 Engineering History and Heritage. The student response to the first courseoffering was highly encouraging. Student survey results indicated that the course seemed to beeffective at addressing a number of important ABET student outcomes. Rather than teachingengineering history per se, the course teaches engineering through historical case studies. Thecourse provides an opportunity to integrate professional and ethical responsibility, impacts ofengineering solutions, sustainability
directly, but there appeared to be a natural relationship between the two,a new category was formed. If no relationship was found between the categories and theassociated cards, the literature-based survey coding was consulted to determine how the category(and corresponding cards) may be assigned. If no consistencies could be found between theaffinity diagrams and the survey coding, a new category was formed. Three such categories wereformed: discipline specific knowledge, creative thinking and engineering ethics. These final,synthesized categories became the outcome variables used in the larger research effort, as shownin Table 1. Definitions for the outcomes were based on the responses written on the individualcards that comprised each group
and signal Data collection and signal Hardware processing processing13 Machine learning for EEG-based Machine learning for EEG-based Data Analysis BCI BCI14 Machine learning for EEG-based Machine learning for EEG-based Data Analysis BCI BCI15 Ethics in BCI Ethics in BCI Summary Sessions16 Student’s project presentation Student’s project presentation Presentation2.3.1 Neuroscience Concept The first portion of the course focuses on an introduction to BCI and the
faculty members in Environmental Engineering as well as facultyfrom Civil Engineering, Chemical and Biological Engineering, History and Philosophy, BusinessManagement, Political Science, and English. From the outset, the team adopted an outcomes-based approach to curricular redesign. In the first phase of the project, the multidisciplinary teamdeveloped a comprehensive list of knowledge, skills, values, and attitudes desired in successfulenvironmental engineering graduates. Targeted competencies encompass discipline-specifictechnical knowledge, as well as cross-disciplinary skillsets related to ethics, communication,teamwork, social justice, economics, sustainability, and public policy. The list of desired studentlearning outcomes was produced
]. The existing literature, though in its nascent stage,has started to uncover several dimensions of GAI’s influence on assessment, highlighting thetransformative potential of GAI in education alongside ethical considerations and the necessityfor responsible implementation strategies [6], [7], [8].Herein, we present a portion of a larger study on engineering faculty members’ mental models ofassessment in the era of GAI. The overarching question for this study is:RQ: How do engineering faculty members’ responses to the arrival of GAI in their assessmentpractices vary based on their demographics?By answering this research question, we aimed to explore if there are trending responses acrosscertain demographics as a start of our study. The findings
. It is called ECE 590, Senior DesignExperience.Before the Fall of 2012, ECE 590 was a one-credit course that focused on ethics. Students intheir final year were expected to select a technical elective to provide them with a designexperience. The ECE faculty decided that a more comprehensive approach was needed toprovide students with a more consistent experience. They also wanted a course that more closelyaligned with the ABET guidelines for a capstone design course.For the Fall 2012 and Spring 2013 semesters, Kim Fowler taught ECE 590, Senior DesignExperience, as a one-credit course. The curriculum contained most of the same material as taughtnow. The students were overburdened with work for a one-credit course. The department thenmoved to a
- ter. Outside of academia, Dr. Szajnfarber has worked as a systems engineer at MDA Space Missions (Canadarm Program) and Dynacon Inc. (Microsatellites); and as a researcher at the European Space Agency (Advanced Concepts Team).Dr. Robert Pless, The George Washington UniversityRyan Watkins, The George Washington University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Building Interdisciplinarity in Engineering Doctoral Education: Insights from DTAIS Summer IncubatorAbstractIn an era where the ethical, social, and technical complexities of artificial intelligence (AI)demand innovative approaches, the significance of diverse
Paper ID #46757Educating for DEI in Construction Engineering: Translating Findings onDisability Considerations on Worksites into Pedagogy and Course ContentProf. Sarah Jayne Hitt, New Model Institute for Technology and Engineering Dr. Sarah Jayne Hitt is the Lead for Transferable Skills at the Centre for Advanced Timber Technology and Founding Professor of Liberal Studies at the New Model Institute for Technology and Engineering in Hereford, UK. She specializes in curriculum development as well as integrating ethics, sustainability, and communication into engineering education, and serves as project manager for the Engineering
Ethics at Boston College. His research is in contemporary environmental issues and their religious, ethical, and political resonances. He is currently at work on a manuscript focused on John Muir, the famed nineteenth-century American conservationist and founder of the Sierra Club, and Muir’s influence on conceptions of the sacred in modern American religious consciousness. Dr. Powell’s research also examines the intersection of race, religion, and environment. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Integrating history and engineering in the first-year core curriculum at Boston College1. IntroductionIn What
Skill Self and Peer Evaluation Thu, 06/14/18 100 1000 Participation Technical Contribution % of class meetings Factor Classroom Participation 5 80+ (18+/22) 100% Ethics + Conduct 10 75-80 (17/22) 94% Resume’ Submission 10 70-75 (16/22) 86% Progress Reports 5 65-70 (15/22) 81% Individual Contribution + 17 60-65 (14/22) 77% Contract 55-60 (13/22
, makers, designers, and technologists. Currently, she is part of a team setting up the Human-Centered Engineering program at Boston College. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Critical perspectives on teaching design in first-year engineeringIntroductionTo engineer is to bring science and technology into a society filled with competing economic,ethical, and political influences. Yet still, engineering programs teach technical content asseparate from their historical, social, and economic contexts, which creates a duality betweenthe technical and social (Cech, 2014; Faulkner, 2000; Leydens & Lucena, 2017). As studentslearn and practice
was to keep the students fromhurting their own systems or putting themselves in danger of breaking a law (for example,hacking into a private or government system), while also ensuring that the students are operatingin a realistic and contemporary environment. This second point is especially difficult as studentsmust see cybersecurity outside of small exercises and apply their skills in a realistic manner.The authors will review the types of projects that students have completed in the last four years atWentworth Institute of Technology. These descriptions will include details of the projects and thetechnical and ethical challenges that accompanied each. These tips and best practices are intendedto provide instructors with a starting point as
Ethics in the Affective Domain Level Example Receiving Individual reads a book passage and recognizes the relationship to ethical behavior. Responding Individual participates in a discussion about the book, reads another book by the same author or another book about ethical behavior, etc. Valuing The individual demonstrates acceptance of the concept by voluntarily attending a lecture on ethical behavior. Organization The individual organizes a study session for other students on topics related to ethical behavior. Characterization The individual is firmly committed to the value of