should not require additional lab facilities, 8). Create a workload that is consistent with the credit that is assigned to the class and support the engineering graphics content of the course, and 9). Depth of training required for instructors and teaching assistants on key issues.The first five factors can be categorized as content issues while the remaining four factors fallunder administrative issues. Some factors, such as 6 and 7, are related to both content andadministrative issues. As an example, factor 7 includes issues dealing with additional facilities,such as machine shops and separate laboratory classes. This point is crucial here at Texas A&MUniversity since there are around 1,200 freshmen and it is almost
students designcapability. Before graduation the student is required to have an equivalent of at least threemonths of field work in their area of study. The three month full-time experience is calledinternship and is mandatory for graduation.Student Choice with Professor ConsentIn the one credit-hour lab associated with a class, the students are usually allowed to selecttheir own lab partner. The laboratories are usually conducted with two-person teams. Thelab experiments are relatively simple, open-ended projects related to the associated class.The students research the scope of the project, design a prototype device, and constructthe prototype device. The prototype device is demonstrated and compared to the students’design specifications for the
should not require additional lab facilities, 8). Create a workload that is consistent with the credit that is assigned to the class and support the engineering graphics content of the course, and 9). Depth of training required for instructors and teaching assistants on key issues.The first five factors can be categorized as content issues while the remaining four factors fallunder administrative issues. Some factors, such as 6 and 7, are related to both content andadministrative issues. As an example, factor 7 includes issues dealing with additional facilities,such as machine shops and separate laboratory classes. This point is crucial here at Texas A&MUniversity since there are around 1,200 freshmen and it is almost
? Investigating relationships between teaching assistants and student outcomes in undergraduate science laboratory classes,” J. Res. Sci. Teach., vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 463–492, Apr. 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21373.[4] C. Kepple and K. Coble, “Investigating potential influences of graduate teaching assistants on students’ sense of belonging in introductory physics labs,” PERC Proc., pp. 282–287, 2019.[5] S. M. Love Stowell et al., “Transforming Graduate Training in STEM Education,” Bull. Ecol. Soc. Am., vol. 96, no. 2, pp. 317–323, Apr. 2015, doi: https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9623-96.2.317.[6] N. M. Trautmann and M. E. Krasny, “Integrating Teaching and Research: A New Model for Graduate Education
Paper ID #36837Cross-Sectional Survey of CS Students’ Knowledge of andAttitudes Toward CybersecurityCheryl Lynn Resch (Lecturer) Cheryl Resch is an Instructional Assistant Professor in the Engineering Education Department at the University of Florida. She teaches core Computer Science courses and Cybersecurity courses in the Computer and Information Science and Engineering Department. Ms. Resch is also a PhD student in Human Centered Computing. Ms. Resch joined University of Florida in 2017. Prior to that she spent 29 years as an engineer at the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory. The last 15 years
prepare students for targeted internships inadvanced process control and automation. The inaugural pilot workshop, titled SystemsAutomation Springboard to Internships (SASI), was held during the winter term of 2021. Studentswere sponsored by companies, who paid the workshop fee, and offered the students an internshipduring the summer of 2021.The content of the SASI workshop, spanning the full spectrum of automation, from fieldinstrumentation through enterprise control systems, is delivered through a mix of lectures,laboratory experiences, programming, and discussions with industry experts. The strength of theworkshop lies in the rich depth and variety of materials offered by a mix of eight industrialpractitioners and three academic instructors
Student Assistant Professor Programs Rayen School of Engineering, College of Engineering, Virginia Tech Youngstown State University Kingsley Nwosu, MEng Mandy J. Wright, MA, MSEd Data Platform Engineer Co-Director | Content Strategy Oak Ridge National Laboratory Fields Wright Communication Consulting3Individual introductions of those present and their roles. 3 Goals and Objectives of CEED and A Step to the Doctorate ProgramA Step to the Doctorate is programming offered by the Center for
completely through online tools such as email, text messaging, and Zoommeetings. This model requires minimal funding and eliminates geographical barriers, allowing studentsthroughout the United States to participate in undergraduate research opportunities without a need torelocate.In the 2020-21 academic year, this innovative research opportunity focused on creating distanceeducation STEM modules on statistical analysis and graphing, two pivotal skills needed for success inengineering and science courses that are often neglected in STEM laboratory curricula at this level.Remote research, coupled with outreach and mentoring of high school students, has never before beenconducted by community college students on the national scale and is a step
sessions, and grant development meetings. Given the recent whole scale move to online learning platforms, this platform has broadapplication for university coursework and laboratory programs. There is a real need to innovateand adapt to serve our students, who are thirsty for tech tools that are more like the traditionalclassrooms that they are all used to using. The innovative platform is much more akin to theirregular classroom environment. It enables students to discuss active learning within a table ofstudents and move freely between tables of students in a virtual classroom setting. Thearrangement has the overarching comfort of seeming like a regular classroom of sorts, whichstudents see to be a distinct advantage. The
Paper ID #32409Resilient Course Design for Teaching a Project-based Engineering CourseOnlineDr. Xiaorong Zhang, San Francisco State University Dr. Xiaorong Zhang is an Associate Professor in Computer Engineering in the School of Engineering at San Francisco State University (SFSU). She is the Director of the Intelligent Computing and Embedded Systems Laboratory (ICE Lab) at SFSU. She has broad research experience in human-machine interfaces, neural-controlled artificial limbs, embedded systems, and intelligent computing technologies. She is a re- cipient of the NSF CAREER Award to develop the next-generation neural
engineering, there were concerns about how social distancing, especially in laboratory exercises,would affect accreditation. The engineering and technology accrediting board, ABET, issued informationrelatively early about changes due to COVID-19. ABET determined short-term changes due to COVIDwould not need to be reported (ABET, 2020). In addition to concerns about having in-person classes andlab exercises, another concern expressed was how to communicate online in ways that are as effectiveas in person. Universities were prompted to provide additional faculty support for teaching and someeven identified some “hacks” that could be used for a graphical interface (University of Nevada Reno,2020). Other lessons learned include better ways to grade
mentors.In fall 2020, the undergraduate research project goals were to lay the foundations of researchmethodologies, technical documentation, sociological perspective, computer programming, andengineering research using digital cameras. The Engineering Scholars participated in a variety ofvirtual seminar settings including discussion, lecture, and hands-on laboratories. Spring 2021seminars build upon fall 2020 to include issues faced by our local communities. Students areguided to see how scientists and engineers view and approach these problems through theapplication of Remote Sensing methodologies. The primary focus is on the analysis of localissues such as natural disasters (wildfires, floods, earthquakes, etc.) and pollution throughsharing
. For this week, twocompletely different topics were being studied: electrochemistry in particular batteries and areview electrolysis as well as coordination compounds and complex ion solubility. Two differenttopics were being studied in one week based on the calendar and trying to incorporate the conceptof coordination compounds before they were covered in the laboratory class.Examples of student responses in week 12 reflect the conceptual confusion on the coordinationcompounds. Student 1 stated “What remains unclear to me is how to name complex ions, ligands,and determining which are cis-trans.” Student 2 noted: “Identifying the coordination number(number of attached ligands), oxidation states of metals in the coordination compounds
in-person laboratory experiences. The course used the video conferencing clientZoom as the primary method of communication. If virtual and in-person learning was happeningsynchronously, the Zoom call was projected in the classroom so that all students could see andhear each other. A video and audio feed was also available from the classroom so that studentscould hear each other across platforms.ResultsThe results of both Cohort A and Cohort B’s activities were extremely promising. Students inCohort A had statistically significant improvements in the number of other students they feltcomfortable working with over the course of the semester. At the start of the semester, studentsidentified in the survey that they were willing to work with an
reflexivity... whether,and to what extent, we [are] ready to reflect on the subject matter of race and racism in thismostly color-blind field of inquiry.” [7] What we observed during the ASEE virtual conferencewere contributions to “Big STS”—a concept introduced by Gary Downey to identify approachesto science and technology studies (STS) that promise broader social impacts beyond themicrosociology of laboratory studies, which have long been privileged in the field.On the surface, this paper is about activisms, social movements, and racial justice in engineeringeducation, but there is an understory about how small and subtle actions, like opening a SlackChannel for crafting, afford alternative virtual maker spaces for different possible futures. Howdo
systems.acknowledgementThis work has been funded by the Global Laboratory for Energy Asset Management andManufacturing (GLEAMM) and Texas Instruments.references[1] A. Ramsetty and C. Adams, "Impact of the digital divide in the age of COVID-19," Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 1147-1148, 2020.[2] H. Greenhalgh-Spencer and M. Jerbi, "Technography and design–actuality gap-analysis of internet computer technologies-assisted education: Western expectations and global education," Policy Futures in Education, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 275-294, 2017.[3] A. Banerjee, P. Glewwe, S. Powers, and M. Wasserman, Expanding access and increasing student learning in post-primary education in
Lots Substantial 1 2 3 4 5The average response with standard deviation is given in Figure 14. As seen by the response toquestion one, the students overwhelmingly lacked experience with technical writing. This wassomewhat surprising given that laboratory courses such as with physics and material sciencetypically require typed reports for experiements. The second question targeted the pace andexecution of said writing assignments. From their response and general classroom discussion,due dates were extended and more specific feedback was provided to help improve subsequentassignments. Always looking for enhanced learning benefit, the fourth question sought toappreciate added
Paper ID #34035Team Formation and Function Decisions and Student Roles on DiverseEngineering Design TeamsDr. David A. Copp, University of California, Irvine David A. Copp received the B.S. degree in mechanical engineering from the University of Arizona and the M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in mechanical engineering from the University of California, Santa Barbara. He is currently an Assistant Professor of Teaching at the University of California, Irvine in the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering. Prior to joining UCI, he was a Senior Member of the Technical Staff at Sandia National Laboratories and an adjunct
this information for continuous program improvement. 5. Curriculum: discussed in depth below. 6. Faculty: requires a faculty of an appropriate size with the qualifications, competence, breadth and depth of knowledge, and authority to provide instruction and advising as well as program continuity, stability, and oversight. 7. Facilities: requires adequate and maintained classrooms, offices, laboratories, library ser- vices, tools, equipment, and computing resources. 8. Institutional Support: requires institutional support of the program to attract and maintain faculty, staff, and resources adequate to ensure the quality and continuity of the program. Table 2: Associate’s Cybersecurity, Criterion 3
literaturethat provide mechanical engineering students with the opportunities to perform hands-on designin their sophomore or junior years. For example, Mascaro et al. at University of Utahimplemented new laboratories which involve hands-on design in the first and second years of themechanical engineering program [12]; Al Hamidi, et al., discussed similar efforts in theMechanical Measurements course at Texas A&M University at Qatar [13]; Hodges and Sullivanimplemented several projects in the Design of Mechanical Systems course, which involvedfabrication of students’ designs in the machine shop [14]. However, these efforts do not involvethe development of an entrepreneurial mindset.The author has tried to implement a group-based hands-on design
activities. Author Laughton is in her first year at the Citadel, but is already thedepartment’s Chemical Hygiene Officer. Her role as Vice President of Campus Affairs in studentgovernment and her service on the EH&S Committee at a larger, research-focused institutionenabled her department to entrust her with the students’ laboratory safety. While she may still belearning the Citadel’s policies, she has sufficient context from her previous leadership roles toadapt quickly and begin to streamline procedures. While not core to Laughton’s career goals, herprevious experiences allow her to complete her role’s responsibilities with minimal time input.The most important reasons that a student participates in a student government organization
. Ethnographic research was alogical fit for our study, which aimed to examine the cultural tension and confluence in femalestudents’ experiences situated in a traditionally male-dominated learning environment.Data Sources After IRB approval, the research team contacted the instructor of the course entitledMilitary Technology and Instrumentation (MTI) or Experimental Research Methods (ERM) toobtain his support for data collection. MTI/ERM was a new course developed through externalgrant support with a goal to broaden the military science and technology workforce. The courseincluded lectures and several hands-on laboratory activities designed to increase students’interest in and knowledge of military technologies and related career opportunities
Paper ID #33821Global Engineering Competencies Learned Through Virtual Exchange ProjectCollaborationDr. Deborah Walter, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Dr. Deborah Walter is an Associate Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. Her areas of expertise include design, and medical imaging. She started college at the University of Maryland (UMD) in College Park. After receiving her PhD at the Pennsylvania State University, she went to work for GE at the Global Research Center. She was in the Computed Tomography laboratory where she helped to design new x-ray CT systems for
University in Flint, Michigan. There, he also served as the program director for Entrepreneurship Across the University. Prior, Doug was the Director of Research & Development for Digisonix Incorporated. His disciplinary specializations include signal processing, acoustics, and wireless communications.Dr. Heather Dillon, University of Washington Tacoma Dr. Heather Dillon is Professor and Chair of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Washington Tacoma. Her research team is working on energy efficiency, renewable energy, fundamental heat transfer, and engineering education. Before joining academia, Heather Dillon worked for the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) as a senior research engineer.Dr. Mark L
University of Louisiana at Lafayette. His research interests are in Hydrology, Water Resources, Rainfall Remote Sensing, Water Management, Coastal Hydrology, and Advances in Hydrology Education ResearchProf. David Tarboton, Utah State University David Tarboton is a professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Utah Water Research Laboratory, Utah State University. He received his Sc.D. and M.S. in Civil Engineering (Water Resources and Hy- drology) from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and his B.Sc Eng in Civil Engineering from the University of Natal in South Africa. His research and teaching are in the area of surface water hydrol- ogy. His research focuses on advancing the capability for hydrologic
’ recognized by the employers. Graduates are expected to be technicalexperts as well as have high quality ‘professional skills’ [3], [4]. Sighting this demand,engineering educators around the world are now making efforts to change the curriculum byadding an EM based course or incorporating associated modules into their courses. Students canexplore EM concepts related to real-world social issues and expand ‘professional skills’ such asrecognizing opportunities, creativity, communication, leadership and adaptability throughexperiential learning modules. Such modules can be easily integrated into design-based coursesas well as laboratory courses to provide students with a hands-on experience and expose them toopen-ended questions. However, it is
EE 301 and CIV 201), thereis generally a step function increase in section enrollment when the number of sections isreduced. While the result is more dramatic for CIV 201 (Statics) and EE 301 (Electrical CircuitsI) as these large enrollment courses declined from 2 sections to 1 section, the impact on studentsmay be greater in a smaller class such as ME 438 (Mechanical Engineering Experimentation)which dropped from 4 sections a semester in the early part of the decade to 2 sections a semesterin the later part. The student experience in a hands-on laboratory course is likely to be impactedmore by larger class sizes than lecture courses.Overall, from Figures 9 and 10 we can get a sense of what impact budget cuts in the second halfof the decade
years. Yalvac’s research is in STEM education, 21st century skills, and design and evaluation of learning environments informed by the How People Learn framework.Dr. Michael D. Johnson, Texas A&M University Dr. Michael D. Johnson is a professor in the Department of Engineering Technology and Industrial Dis- tribution at Texas A&M University. He also serves as Associate Dean for Inclusion and Faculty Success in the College of Engineering. Prior to joining the faculty at Texas A&M, he was a senior product de- velopment engineer at the 3M Corporate Research Laboratory in St. Paul, Minnesota. He received his B.S. in mechanical engineering from Michigan State University and his S.M. and Ph.D. from the Mas
contactat the same time. We plan to further investigate VR across several course iterations and areoptimistic that these immersive tools will help to better train young construction professionalsbefore they join the industry.Keywords - VR, Education, Construction, Hybrid learning, TechnologyIntroductionHistorically, educational methods during K-12 studies and beyond usually involve classroominstruction, field visits, and using equipment in laboratories. In order to keep up with the fast-pacedsociety, traditional methods have continually been supplemented with technology such ashandheld devices and/or computers. While involving these devices in an educational setting mayset the stage for some distractions and interruptions, the positive outcomes of
ofplywood to the back of the original handle. After the wood glue dried up, they applied the firstcoat of white spray paint on the LAB.Students had already 3D-printed educational shapes that are used for the shape drop activities.There is a blue cube, red cylinder, and a yellow triangular prism as shown in Figure 9a. They allhave the same dimensions of 1.5” W, 1.5” L, and 1.5” H. The right dimensions of the shapes arevery important because they need to fit in the slots in the board, as well as making sure they werebig enough for the children to handle safely. It took about an hour and a half for each shape tobe completed in the Engineering Technology laboratories as seen in Figure 9b. (a