(IRB2015-0672D).References 1. The Innovative and Entrepreneurial University, retrieved from https://www.eda.gov/pdf/the_innovative_and_entrepreneurial_university_report.pdf2. University Maker Spaces” Discover, Optimization and Measurement of Impacts, Morocz, R. J., Levy, B. D., Forest, C. R. , Nagel, R. L. Newstetter, W. C., Talley, K., G., Linsey, J. S. 2015 ASEE3. Barrett, T. W., Pizzico, C. M., Levy, B., Nagel, R. L. A Review of University Maker Spaces, 2015 ASEE, June 2015, Seattle, WA.4. Forest, C., et al. The Invention Studio: A University Maker Space and Culture. Advances in Engineering Education, Summer 2014.5. Tate, M., Norris, S. A Maker Space of Their Own, Prism, October 20146. Rees, P., Olsom, C
Paper ID #16995A Design-and-Build Project for Heat Transfer CourseDr. Mehmet Sozen, Grand Valley State University Dr. Mehmet S¨ozen is a professor of mechanical engineering at Grand Valley State University. His general area of interest is thermo/fluid sciences with specialty in transport phenomena in porous media, thermal management of high heat flux systems and applications of alternative energy systems. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 A Design and Build Project for Heat Transfer CourseAbstract Design and build type projects could constitute a part of experiential
standard resultsSuppose a conduction electron in a quantum dot emits a photon with Calculation not statisticallyfrequency of 600 THz as it drops to the valence band. Determine its band significantgap in units of both J and eV. p=0.68Calculate the Reynolds number of a 100 nm diameter spherical fullerene Calculation not statistically(i.e., buckyball) falling by gravity at 1 m/s in air (density = 1.23 kg/m3, significantviscosity = 1.72 x 10–5 Pa-s). p=0.81Name and
., Bost, L. F., Hermann, C. D., Forest, C. R. (2012). A quantitative analysis of the effects of a multidisciplinary engineering capstone design course. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(4), 630-656. 6. Howe, S. and Wilbarger, J. (2006). 2005 National survey of engineering capstone design courses. In: 2006 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. Chicago, Illinois. 7. Klukken, P. G., Parsons, J. R., Columbus, P. J. (1997). The creative experience in engineering practice: Implications for engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 86(2), 133-138. 8. Liston, C., Peterson, K., Ragan, V. (2008). Evaluating practices in informal science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education
, Surveying and Digital Media. He also earned his B.S. in Product Devel- opment Engineering Technology at ETSU in 2013. Mr. Craig also has held a Master Plumber License as well as a natural gas license since the early 1980’s. He owned and operated Lenny’s Plumbing and Water Treatment in the 1980’s and 1990’s. He currently works in the Educational Leadership and Policy Analysis department at ETSU as a doctoral fellow while pursuing his Ed.D. in Private Sector Educational Leadership.Mr. Addison Scott Karnes, East Tennessee State University Addison Karnes received his B.S. in Engineering Technology with a concentration in Product Develop- ment from East Tennessee State University (ETSU) in 2012. He then received his M.S. in
sense1. Later, Spearman in 1905 developed his two-factor theory of intelligence. Hedivided intelligence into general intelligence ‘G’ and several group specific factors ‘S’. Simonand Binet developed the first spatial ability test around the same time Spearman proposed histheory. It was known as the “Scales of Intelligence”2.Spatial ability research started gaining importance at the onset of World War I in 1918, when theUnited States Army conducted large scale testing procedures in order to enroll militarypersonnel. These tests were called as Examination Alpha and Examination Beta1. ExaminationAlpha was administered to literate personnel and consisted primarily of verbal material.Examination Beta was the battery of tests that included non
. References1. Bloodgood, J., Turnley, W., and Mudrack, P. (2010). Ethics Instruction and the Perceived Acceptability of Cheating. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(1), 23-37.2. Williams, S. D. and T. Dewett: 2005, ‘Yes You Can Teach Business Ethics: A Review and Research Agenda’, Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies 12(2), 109–120.3. Merriam-Webster Dictionary (2015). Retrieved on October 1, 2015. http://www.merriam- webster.com/dictionary/ethics.4. Harris, C. E., Davis, M., Pritchard, M. S. and Rabins, M. J. (1996), Engineering Ethics: What? Why? How? And When? Journal of Engineering Education, 85: 93–96. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830. 1996.tb00216.x5. Desplaces, D., Beauvais, L., Melchar, D., and Bosco, S
airframe had a design weight of 35 pounds and a wing loading of W/S= 2.92 pounds per square foot, the wing area of the wing was 12 square feet. The aspect ratio wasAR = 6.75. This aspect ratio yields nearly an elliptical lift distribution, which is the most efficientlift distribution that can be attained. The wingspan was determined to be 108 inches. Theconfiguration was a conventional tractor type, Figure 3.2. Figure 3.2 The students know the primary ISR mission requires some type of imaging device plus itspower and control source. Because of issues with the first design of residue affecting the cameradome, which is under the fuselage, the next design featured a twin-boom, pusher configuration
Paper ID #16783Teaching Software Requirements Inspections to Software Engineering Stu-dents through Practical Training and ReflectionMr. Anurag Goswami, North Dakota State University Anurag Goswami is a Ph. D. Candidate in the department of Computer Science at North Dakota State University. His main research interests include empirical software engineering, human factors in software engineering, and software quality.Dr. Gursimran Singh Walia, North Dakota State University Gursimran S. Walia is an associate professor of Computer Science at North Dakota State University. His main research interests include empirical software
. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. F., & Leifer, L. (2005). Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 34(1), 103–120.5. Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional Ecology , ’ Translations ’ and Boundary Objects : Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley ’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology , 1907-39. Social Studies of Sciences, 19(3), 387–420.6. Galison, P. (1999). Trading Zone: Coordinating Action and Belief. In M. Biagioli (Ed.), The Science Studies Reader (pp. 137–160). New York: Routledge.7. Grinter, L. E. (1956). Report on the evaluation of engineering education. Journal of Engineering education, 46, 25-63.8. Dutson, A. J., Todd, R. H., Magleby, S. P., & Sorensen, C. D
Development (Morgan and Claypool, 2010) and editor of Sociotechnical Com- munication in Engineering (Routledge, 2014). Dr. Leydens won the James F. Lufkin Award for the best conference paper—on the intersections between professional communication research and social jus- tice—at the 2012 International Professional Communication Conference. In 2015, he won the Ronald S. Blicq Award for Distinction in Technical Communication Education from the Professional Communica- tion Society of the Institute for Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE). His current research focuses on rendering visible and integrating the social justice dimensions inherent in three components of the engineering curriculum—in engineering sciences
in multiple categories, following recommendations by Reid and his coauthors,we identified the top one or two content classifications for each course based on the percentageof subtopics covered in the course and the percentage of course time dedicated to each topic. Table 1. Summary Of Eight Department Introduction to Engineering Courses Typical Primary Credit Contact Department FYE Course(s) Course Content Hours Hours
engineering curriculum is not new. Many engineeringprograms meet EAC of ABET General Criterion 5 requirements through the use of project-basedsenior design course(s). Project-based design courses have been shown to have positive impacton professional skills post-graduation3. However, such courses occur at the end of thecurriculum and the ability to study the impact on the curriculum as a whole is not possible.Oregon State University demonstrated the use and benefits of a robotics project-based courseearly in an electrical engineering curriculum4,5 with the TekBot platform. Since that time otherengineering programs have implemented and studied the impact of project-based roboticscourses early in the curriculum. As an example, the United States Naval
solutions can vary drasticallybased on the perceived size of the solution space of the problem as a whole.AcknowledgementsThis research was supported by the National Science Foundation, Research in EngineeringEducation (REE) Grants #1264715, #1265018, and #1264551.References1. Silk EM, Daly SR, Jablokow KW, Yilmaz S, Rosenberg M. (2014). The design problem framework: Using adaption-innovation theory to construct design problem statements. Annual Conference of American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE), June 16-18, Indianapolis, IN2. Brophy DR (2001) Comparing the attributes, activities, and performance of divergent, convergent, and combination thinkers. Creat Res J 13:439–4553. Liu Y-C, Chakrabarti A, Bligh T (2003) Towards an
"gain knowledge," “ideas,” and “techniques” to take back as externalartifacts "portable to a variety of campuses." Change happens when I take the right things home -- things like "tools to help in the curriculum change process" or "ways to get students doing morestuff in class.” I’ve heard that “active learning” and “group dynamics” are examples of things Imight pick up at the workshop.My implementation of these good-teaching artifacts will change my students into betterstudents. "I want my students to be invested in their education" and "care about my specialty"enough to "pursue further learning.” Even the “quieter wallflower[s]” and the ones who “runaway from the STEM fields” should be “craft[ed] into good, effective, & happy
: What Effective Teachers Think. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Washington) June, 2006.2. Bruning, R. H., Schraw, G. J. & Ronning, R. R. (1999). Cognitive psychology and instruction. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.3. Clark, C. M. (1995). Thoughtful Teaching. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.4. Fenstermacher, G. D. (1979). A philosophical consideration of recent research on teacher effectiveness. In L. S. Shulman (Ed.), Review of Research in Education, 6. (pp. 157-185). Itasca, IL: F. E. Peacock Publisher.5. Carberry, A. R. (2014). Investigating the role teacher and student engineering epistemological beliefs plan in engineering education. In J. Heywood & A. Cheville (Eds
of the Fifth International Conference on Quality Software, pages 313–316, Washington, DC, USA, 2005. IEEE Computer Society.2. T. Y. Chen and P.-L. Poon. Experience with teaching black-box testing in a computer science/software engineering curriculum. IEEE Trans. on Educ., 47(1):42–50, Feb. 2004.3. Z. Chen, J. Zhang, and B. Luo. Teaching software testing methods based on diversity principles. In Proceedings of the 2011 24th IEEE-CS Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training, pages 391–395, Washington, DC, USA, 2011. IEEE Computer Society.4. S. H. Edwards. Improving student performance by evaluating how well students test their own programs. J. Educ. Resour. Comput., 3(3), Sept. 2003.5. S. Elbaum, S
Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (pp. 9–17). ACM. doi:10.1145/2090116.20901185 Few, S. (2006). Information dashboard design: the effective visual communication of data (1st ed.). Beijing ; Cambride [MA]: O’Reilly.6 Malik, S. (2005). Enterprise dashboards: design and best practices for IT. Hoboken, N.J: John Wiley.7 Siemens, G. (2014). Supporting and promoting learning analytics research. Journal of Learning Analytics, 1(1), 3– 5.8 Siemens, G. (2012). Learning analytics: envisioning a research discipline and a domain of practice. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge. Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, ACM: 4
Engineering Education, 2015 Development and Implementation of a Pathway Assessment Model for the ASPIRE ProgramAbstractThe University of New Haven received S-STEM funding for A Scholarship Program to IncreaseRetention in Engineering (ASPIRE): Improving Work-Study-Life Balance. The goal of the 5 yearprogram is to improve retention, particularly in the sophomore and junior years, for engineeringstudents who show academic potential but are at risk of not completing their studies due tofinancial concerns and/or life-work-study balance issues. The ASPIRE program aims toaccomplish this by: providing scholarships for sophomore and junior level matriculated studentsbased on both financial need and merit; recruiting and
, and multivariable control. Dr. Rodriguez has given over 70 invited presentations - 13 plenary - at international and national forums, conferences and corporations. Since 1994, he has directed an extensive engineering mentoring-research academic success and professional development (ASAP) program that has served over 500 students. These efforts have been supported by NSF STEP, S-STEM, and CSEM grants as well as industry. Dr. Rodriguez’ research inter- ests include: control of nonlinear distributed parameter, and sampled-data systems; modeling, simulation, animation, and real-time control (MoSART) of Flexible Autonomous Machines operating in an uncertain Environment (FAME); design and control of micro-air vehicles
://www.ifmachines.com/, accessed March 2015.3. Adafruit (2015) “About Us,” http://www.adafruit.com/about, accessed March 2015.4. Adafruit (2015) “Wearable Electronics,” http://www.adafruit.com/beckystern, accessed March 2015.5. Goulev, P., Stead, L., Mamdani, E. and Evans, C. (2004). “Computer aided emotional fashion.” Computers & Graphics. 28(5), 657–66.6. Catrysse, M., Puers, R., Hertleer, C.,Van Langenhove, L., Van Egmond, H., Matthys, D. (2004). “Towards the integration of textile sensors in a wireless monitoring suit.” Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 114(2-3), 302– 311.7. Dunne, L.E., Brady, S., Smyth, B., Diamond, D. (2005). “Initial development and testing of a novel foam-based pressure sensor for wearable
Homeland Page 26.668.3Security S & T professionals, Mississippi Academy of Sciences Annual Meeting, and ATMAEAnnual Conference. The students had the opportunities to present research papers, participate inworkshops and social events, as well as to interact with the representatives from federal, state,and local governments, hospitals, charity organizations, and private sector.During the past several years, the EMT program has placed students into internship positions atthe National Transportation Security Center of Excellence at Tougaloo College, NationalWeather Service (Jackson, Mississippi), the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
of the historical case studiespresented in class as well as to apply the risk assessment tools developed during the seminar.Final papers were judged using the same rubric as the initial writing assignment. On averagestudents’ understanding of ethical concepts more than doubled to 4.3 out of 5 as did their abilityto apply risk assessment tools to ethical problems (4.1 out of 5).AcknowledgmentsThe development of this seminar was partially supported by the John J. and Dorothy Byrne FirstYear Seminar Program Endowment at Rutgers University.References1 Haws, D.R. (2001). Ethics Instruction in Engineering Education: A (Mini) Meta-Analysis. ASEE Journal ofEngineering Education, 90:2, 223-229.2 Thiel, C. E., Connelly, S., Harkrider, L., Devenport, L
identify the applicationsof digital circuits, perform simulations, and conduct experiments firsthand. As a result, they havea better grasp of the subject, and have a better understanding and significance of digital circuits.The proposed format became very attractive to students as they were able to see the benefits intheir learning during a short span of time, and were better prepared for future courses inengineering disciplines.Bibliography1. A. Ganago, H. Liao, “Student learning in a required Electrical Engineering (EE) course for non-EE majors: Perception of values for future work in multidisciplinary teams,” Proceedings of American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, June 2013.2. D. G. Rosa-Pohl, S. A
and team activities that directly contributed to theachievement of learning outcomes. The effectiveness of peer evaluation will also be assessed inthe future.References Page 26.1074.101. ABET, Engineering Accreditation Commission, 2010, “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs,” ABETInc, Baltimore, MD.2. Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., Ross, G., 1976, “The Role of Tutoring in Problem Solving,” Journal of Psychology andPsychiatry, 17, pp. 89-100.3. Bender, W. N., 2012, “Project-Based Learning: Differentiating Instruction for the 21 st Century,” Corwin Press.4. Boss, S., Krauss, J., 2007, “Reinventing Project-Based Learning,” International
course increased my knowledge of the subject. 208 103 13 3 0 4.55 5. The examples and activities helped me understand 157 113 47 8 0 4.24 the information. 6. I could follow along with the instructor(s) in the 241 74 10 0 0 4.65 student guide. 7. I was encouraged to ask questions and participate 219 84 23 1 0 4.57 throughout class. Page 26.1088.6 8. The course prepared me for the test. 205 87 24 2 0 4.40 9. I would recommend this course to others. 208 85 25 7 0 4.47 10. Overall, the course met my
, organization is key for this experience! 3. For each dye: • Wet the fabrics thoroughly with warm water • Dip the fabrics in the dye for about five minutes • Remove the fabrics from the dye, squeeze out until damp, and arrange to dry • As you arrange them to dry, keep track of mordant/dye combination!Assignment: Due 3/5/14Arrange your dry fabric swatches in a pattern so you can draw conclusions about theeffect of mordant and fabric type. You may cut the fabric if you wish. Hand in thearrangement(s) along with the worksheet (below).Name: ___________________________________Dyeing Conclusions (available on Moodle)Effect of:Fabric Type
. Prosser. Engineering students' conceptions of and approaches to learning through discussions in face-‐to-‐face and online contexts. Learning and 63 19.9% Instruction, 18(3), 267-‐282. 2008. R.A. Ellis, P., Goodyear, M. Prosser, A. & O'Hara. How and what university students learn through online and face-‐to-‐face discussion: Conceptions, intentions and approaches. Journal 51 16.1% of Computer Assisted Learning, 22(4), 244-‐256. 2006. S. Ozkan & R. Koseler. Multi-‐dimensional students’ evaluation of e-‐learning systems in the higher education context: An empirical
taught a variety of classes ranging introductory programming and first-year engineering design courses to introductory and advanced courses in electronic circuits. He is a member of ASEE, IEEE, and ACM.Dr. Kathleen A Harper, The Ohio State University Kathleen A. Harper is a senior lecturer in the Engineering Education Innovation Center at The Ohio State University. She received her M. S. in physics and B. S. in electrical engineering and applied physics from Case Western Reserve University, and her Ph. D. in physics from The Ohio State University. She has been on the staff of Ohio State’s University Center for the Advancement of Teaching, in addition to teaching in both the physics department and college of
profession. 4. Develop flow diagram construction and structured programming skills in MATLAB. 5. Learn the use of engineering tools (spreadsheets, drawing software, math, economics, etc.) 6. Become knowledgeable of dimensions (length, time, mass, force, temperature, electric current, energy and power) and related engineering parameters. Page 26.1461.4Instructional approaches, the flipped classroomA key aspect with respect to ENGR100’s instructional approach was the decision to implementthe flipped classroom, often referred to as “Learn before Lecture”. The professors were asked toimplement this strategy in each of their