Paper ID #46661Living through the Culture Change: Faculty Perceptions of a MechanicalEngineering Departmental Teaching Culture Pre- and Post-InterventionEmma Edoga M.S., Texas A&M University Emma is an PhD student in the Industrial-Organizational Psychology program at Texas A&M University. Her research interests center around issues related to workplace diversity & inclusion, the experiences of Black women in the workplace, the effects of stigmatization and stereotyping, and authenticity/identity. She also has conducted research within the engineering education space, specifically focusing on teaching culture
.” Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, no. 105 (March). https://doi.org/10.29173/istl2810.Harlan, Sharon L., David N. Pellow, J. Timmons Roberts, Shannon Elizabeth Bell, William G. Holt, and Joane Nagel. 2015. “Climate Justice and Inequality.” In Climate Change and Society: Sociological Perspectives, edited by Riley E. Dunlap and Robert J. Brulle, 0. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199356102.003.0005.Hess, Justin L., Athena Lin, Andrew Whitehead, and Andrew Katz. 2024. “How Do Ethics and Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Relate in Engineering? A Systematic Review.” Journal of Engineering Education 113 (1): 143–63. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20571.Kimmerer, Robin Wall
Paper ID #45820Better Student Presentations: A Mini-Course in Visual Design Principles toTurn Engineering Students Into More Effective Communicators Immediately(Work in Progress)Ms. Phyllis Beck, Mississippi State University Phyllis Beck is a blend of art and science having completed an undergraduate degree in Fine Arts at MSU and a PH.D in Computer Science where she focused on applying Artificial Intelligence, Natural language Processing and Machine Learning techniques to the engineering education space. Currently, she is working as an Assistant Research Professor at Mississippi State University in the Bagley College of
implications of this event. This paper presents our findings to how students answered thefollowing questions related to our case study: “How do you practice being ethical as an engineerthrough language? What lessons can you learn from the Flint Water Crisis?” In the followingsection, we provide background information on the Flint Water Crisis that was embedded into thecourse content.Engineering is conceptualized in this study as a sociotechnical practice ( McGowan & Bell,2020). This perspective highlights how engineering work impacts and is influenced by society(Rodrigues and Cicek, 2024). According to Mazzurco and Daniel (2020), sociotechnical thinkinghas three domains: technology, people, and broader context. Within this framework
scoping review," Studies in Engineering Education, vol. 1, no. 2, p. 71, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.21061/see.19.[4] C. E. Vargas-Ordonez, S. Wei, and T. Li, "‘At the bottom of the food chain’: Constructing academic identity in engineering education as international graduate students,” in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Minneapolis, MN, 2022.[5] M. Denton, M. Borrego, and A. Boklage, “Community cultural wealth in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education: A systematic review,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 109, no. 3, pp. 556–580, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.1002/jee.20322.[6] D. Tolbert Smith, “‘They are here to support me’: Community cultural wealth assets and precollege experiences of
&Amp; Excellence in Education, vol. 44, pp. 93–114, -02-10. 2011.[8] T.O. Griffith and J.R. Ford, "Say Her Name: The Socialization of Black Women inGraduate School," Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice, vol. 60, pp. 279–292, -06-16. 2022.[9] M. Ong, C. Wright, L.L. Espinosa & and G. Orfield, "Inside the Double Bind: ASynthesis of Empirical Research on Undergraduate and Graduate Women of Color in Science,Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics," Harvard Educational Review, vol. 81, pp. 172–390, 2011.[10] K. Rainey, M. Dancy, R. Mickelson, E. Stearns and S. Moller, "Race and genderdifferences in how sense of belonging influences decisions to major in STEM," IJ STEM Ed,vol. 5, pp. 1–14, April 10. 2018.[11] B.A
Paper ID #46194WIP: Students’ metacognition and how it relates to their performance inconceptual problem-solving introductory Engineering courses.Juan Alvarez, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign Juan Alvarez joined the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at University of Illinois faculty in Spring 2011 and is currently a Teaching Assistant Professor. Prior to that, he was a Postdoctoral Fellow in the Department of Mathematics and Statistics at York University, Canada, a Postdoctoral Fellow in the Chemical Physics Theory Group at the University of Toronto, Canada, and a Postdoctoral Fellow in the
Paper ID #48256Work-in-Progress: An Analysis of the Effect of Mechanical and AerospaceEngineering Students’ Learning Experiences on Career PathwaysLani McGuire, The Ohio State University Lani McGuire is a first-year PhD student in Engineering Education at the Ohio State University. His research interests lie in exploring undergraduate and pre-college engineering student opportunities and experiences.Dr. Benjamin Ahn, The Ohio State University Dr. Benjamin Ahn is an Associate Professor at The Ohio State University in the Department of Engineering Education. ©American Society for Engineering
engineering education (n=65, 18.2%) and computing scienceeducation, including traditional engineering (n=122; 34.2%) and computer science (n=75; 21.0%)disciplines, higher education (n=22, 6.2%), psychology (n=21; 5.9%), STEM education (n=6,1.7%), and others (e.g., computer and information technology, social science, and curriculum andinstruction). Considering that engineering and computing science education researchers are oftenaffiliated with traditional engineering and computer science discipline, further analysis on theindividual authors with higher contributions needs to be conducted as a next step.Geographic location of study The geographic distribution of studies indicates a strong dominanceof research conducted in the United States (n=272
the engineering designprocess (EDP) and culturally responsive pedagogy (CRP). The integration of EDP into K-12science education enhances student learning by connecting scientific concepts to real-worldapplications. For example, designing water filtration systems allows students to apply scientificprinciples to tangible, problem-solving contexts. The National Academy of Engineering and theNational Research Council [4] emphasize EDP’s potential to improve problem-solving skills,deepen STEM understanding, and promote technological literacy through hands-on learning.In parallel, CRP provides a framework for engaging diverse learners by incorporating theircultural identities, experiences, and perspectives into instruction. It validates
; semiconductor different opinions. It wasn't like a group project industry. where there's a specific thing that needs to be done; • Working as a Systems Test Engineer, responsible for rather, it's a little broad, so you could do your own implementing the integration and verification research, which brought a lot of interesting ideas. strategy critical to support the release of cutting-edge • I think once we understood the model and used it for technology and valid system configurations. research, we got used to working together all the • As a student at UB
Paper ID #48767GIFTS: Introduction of the Engineering Design Process in a First Year MultidisciplinaryCourse though use of Wind PowerDr. Kevin Wanklyn, Kansas State University Kevin Wanklyn is the Undergraduate Program Director in the Alan Levin Department of Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering at Kansas State University. He serves as a Teaching Associate Professor, where he teaches the first-year experience course for the Carl R. Ice College of Engineering and teaches core subjects such as Thermodynamics and Fluid Mechanics. Dr. Wanklyn earned his B.S. (2000), M.S. (2002), and Ph.D. (2008) in Mechanical Engineering, all
Mechanics, ActiveLearning, Classroom Participation, Inclusive Learning, Gamified Learning Strategies,Educational Innovation in STEM.1. IntroductionActive learning—where students meaningfully engage in tasks, discussions, and problem-solving—has been widely recognized as an effective strategy for improving conceptualunderstanding and student performance in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics(STEM) fields [1]. Prince defines active learning as any instructional method that encouragesstudents to actively participate in the learning process rather than passively absorbing informationthrough traditional lecturing [1]. Research consistently shows that these methods not only improveacademic achievement but also foster higher-order thinking
Paper ID #49696Bridging Abstract Mathematics and Practical Engineering Design: A Pre-CapstoneProject to Enhance Learning and Cultivate EntrepreneurshipDr. Mehran Andalibi, Embry Riddle Aeronautical University Mehran Andalibi has been with Embry Riddle Aeronautical University, Prescott, AZ as an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering and director of robotics and rapid prototyping labs since 2015. He graduated from Oklahoma State University with Ph.D. in Mechanical engineering in 2010. His research interests are engineering education, artificial intelligence, and robotics.Dr. Jonathan M Adams, United States Military
Paper ID #47935Case Study: Impediments to achieving systemic changes to support diversity,equity, and inclusion in the engineering professoriateDr. Kimberly Stillmaker P.E., California State University, Fresno Dr. Kimberly Stillmaker is an Associate Professor in the Civil Engineering Department at California State University, Fresno and currently serves as the Director of Foundations For Success, the Lyles College of Engineering’s first year program. Her areas of expertise are in structural engineering, specifically seismic design and analysis of steel structures, and gender equity in engineering. She teaches undergraduate
Paper ID #45797Characterizing Interactions Between Master’s Engineering Students and TheirEnvironment During the Advisor-Matching Process with the Person-EnvironmentInteraction ModelDr. Boni Frances Yraguen, Penn State Boni Yraguen is a postdoctoral fellow at Penn State working in the Engineering Cognitive Research Lab. Boni is an ASEE eFellow studying engineering graduate student attrition and how graduate students engage with institutional support systems. She has led and participated in various educational studies on the impact of student reflections, authentic learning assignments, the use of technology in the
; Sciences Education in Europe; Editors: E Cohen de Lara and H Drop; Wilmington, DE; Vernon Press; 2017.5. D Epstein; Range: Why Generalists Triumph in a Specialized World; New York, NY; Riverhead Books; 2019.6. I Leslie; Curious: The Desire to Know and Why Your Future Depends on it; New York, NY; Basic Books; 2014.7. D Riley; “Pedagogies of Liberation in an Engineering Thermodynamics Class,” ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition; 2003; Nashville, Tennessee.8. JC Lucena and GL Downey; “Engineering Cultures: Better Problem Solving through Human and Global Perspectives?,” ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition; 1999; Charlotte, North Carolina.9. EA Cech; “Culture of Disengagement in Engineering Education?,” Science, Technology, &
on evaluating itseffectiveness and developing innovative tools, this paper addresses the challenge of applyingthese tools in advanced engineering courses and tracking changes from a student perspective.Measuring Educational Effectiveness of Accessibility in Advanced Engineering Content: Theaccessibility of upper-level university engineering courses is a pressing concern, with UniversalDesign for Learning (UDL) emerging as a pivotal framework for fostering inclusivity. UDLprinciples, which advocate for multiple means of representation, action, and engagement, aim tominimize barriers for diverse learners, including students with disabilities (SWDs). Keychallenges include resistance to adopting inclusive practices and technological constraints
Paper ID #45930Assessing the Engineering Identity of Elementary School Students Throughthe Application of a Critical Thinking Skills Framework: Pre-college Researchto PracticeMs. Alison Haugh Nowariak, University of Minnesota Alison Haugh Nowariak is a Ph.D candidate at the University of Minnesota in the Department of Curriculum and Instruction. She is also a STEM specialist teacher for K-5th grade students in ISD 196 in Minnesota. Prior to working in the schools and attending the University of Minnesota, she worked as an undergraduate researcher at the Playful Learning Lab in the Department of Engineering at the University of
high-impact practice experiences,” Coll. Teach., vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 191–201, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2020.1846487.[22] L. Archambault, A. Warren, and R. Foley, “Sustainability education framework for teachers: Developing sustainability literacy through futures, values, systems, and strategic thinking,” J. Sustain. Educ., vol. 6, 2014.[23] E. Sahin, H. Ertepinar, and G. Teksoz, “Engineering students’ understandings and attitudes pertaining to sustainability,” presented at the 3rd International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies, Proceedings of EDULEARN11 Conference, 2011, pp. 4195–4201.[24] Sharifah Nurlaili Farhana Syed Azhar, Noor Adelyna Mohammed Akib, S. Sibly, and M
Paper ID #48518WIP: Developing an Onboarding Seminar Series for Non-traditional and MilitaryStudents in Engineering: A Design-based Research ApproachHannah Wilkinson, Utah State University Hannah Wilkinson is a PhD candidate in Engineering Education at Utah State University. She received a B.S. in Chemical Engineering in from the University of Utah and an M.S. in Engineering Education at Utah State University.Dr. Angela Minichiello P.E., Utah State University Angela (Angie) Minichiello, PhD is a military veteran, licensed mechanical engineer, and Associate Professor of Engineering Education at Utah State University
Paper ID #47952Y(Our) story: A collaborative autoethnographic reflection of a faculty communityof practice to promote equity-oriented engineering educationDr. Jay Mann, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign Jay Mann is Director of the Academy for Excellence in Engineering Education (AE3) in the Grainger College of Engineering at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. Dr. Mann is a twenty-five-year veteran educator with previous experience as a high school classroom teacher, school administrator, and teacher educator. He is a three-time graduate of the University of Illinois (A.B. in History; M.Ed. in
Paper ID #48473Affordances and Challenges in the Transition from Research Internship toGraduate Studies for Colombian Engineering Students in the USAMr. Manuel Jos´e Alejandro Baquero Sierra, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI) Alejandro Baquero-Sierra is a fourth-year Ph.D. student in Literacy and Language at Purdue University. He holds a Bachelor’s degree in Psychology and a Master’s degree in Public Administration. His research focuses on the intersection of psychology and education, particularly within K-12 settings, with an emphasis on promoting well-being, self-regulation, and trauma-informed practices. Recently
their mindset sothey can identify opportunities, assess risks, and generate value for society and the economy. Theintegration of entrepreneurial thinking into engineering and technology programs has gainedsignificant momentum in recent years, driven by the recognition of its transformative potential.Through an entrepreneurial mindset, engineering graduates become the key contributors toeconomic innovation and growth [2]. These individuals, the entrepreneurial engineers, are notjust contributors, but key drivers of technological advancement and economic progress. In fact,some researchers argue that entrepreneurial engineers form the backbone of national economicdevelopment [3].Both public and private sectors have supported various initiatives to
project aims to equip engineering students with essential data analysisskills to prepare them for the modern labor market. The study's specific objectives are as follows:to promote evidence-based decision-making, to improve customer-focused product customization,to generate competitive advantage, to improve decision-making under uncertain conditions, and topromote continuous quality improvement. The curriculum is being updated to meet the demandsof the labor market and technological advances. The methodology includes identifying educationalneeds, setting clear objectives, designing and implementing the curriculum, and continuouslyevaluating its impact for improvement. Research findings have indicated a substantial enhancementin students' capacity
Paper ID #49062How a Cornerstone Course Impacts Self-Efficacy and Entrepreneurial SkillsProf. Catalina Cortazar, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile Catalina Cort´azar is a Faculty member in the engineering design area DILAB at the School of Engineering at Pontificia Universidad Cat´olica de Chile (PUC). Catalina holds a Ph.D. in Engineering Science with a focus on Engineering Education from PUC, an MFA in Design and Technology from Parsons The New School for Desing, an MA in Media Studies from The New School, and a bachelor’s degree in Civil Engineering, with a concentration in Structural Design.Gabriel
affectsaccess to venture capital and technical expertise, reinforcing structural inequalities inentrepreneurship. Our study also explores the implications of these findings for engineering andentrepreneurship education. We propose integrating equity-centered networking strategies intoengineering curricula, equipping students—particularly those from minoritized backgrounds—with the tools to build effective, diverse entrepreneurial networks. By reimaginingentrepreneurship education through a race-conscious lens, we contribute to fostering inclusiveand sustainable pathways for URM entrepreneurs in STEM and technology sectors.INTRODUCTIONA report by McKinsey & Company (2019) estimated that advancing racial equity could add 1trillion to 1.5 trillion to
Paper ID #48182Considering Personal Mastery as a Framework for Developing Students’ Affinityfor Lifelong Learning [Research]Bailey Kathryn McOwen, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Bailey McOwen is a Ph.D. student in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech with an academic foundation in physics and industrial engineering. Her research focuses on workforce development, professional training for engineering practitioners, and engineering ethics, with an emphasis on how emerging technologies can enhance continued education. Through her research, service, and academic work, she aims to bridge engineering
Paper ID #45544Defining your Why: Cultivating Identity and Belonging through Coaching onCommunicationDr. Andrea T Kwaczala, Western New England University Andrea Kwaczala is an associate professor at Western New England University in the biomedical engineering department. She teaches Biomechanics, Product Development and Innovation, Senior Design and Prosthetic and Orthotic Devices. She also teaches in the 1st year program.Andrea Davis, Western New England UniversityDr. Heidi Ellis, Western New England University Heidi Ellis is a Professor in the Computer Science and Information Technology department at Western New England
narrative methodologies to understand student experiences and exploring novel work-based learning approaches.Dr. Mehdi Khazaeli, University of the Pacific Mehdi Khazaeli is an Associate Professor in School of Engineering and Computer Science at University of the Pacific. He also serves as Director of Pacificˆa C™s Technological Innovation and Entrepreneurship (TIE) Program. He teaches courses in Building InfoDr. Bidisha Burman, University of the Pacific Dr. Bidisha Burman (Ph.D. Louisiana State University) is a Visiting Professor of Marketing in the Eberhardt School of Business at the University of the Pacific. Prior to ESB, she has served as Associate Professor of Marketing at University of Mary Washington and