assignedgroups.Giving our UGTAs the opportunity to reflect on their social positionalities served as a platformto discuss inclusive leadership and teaching [15, 16, 23]. For the remainder of the time, theUGTAs were asked to reflect and discuss several prompts, including: 4. In reviewing the principles of inclusive leadership, which principle would I identify as a strength and where I feel the most comfortable? 4 5. Are there specific times where I felt this was affirmed? 6. Which principle(s) would I identify as an area of growth? 7. What actions can I take to grow in this principle?The day following the workshops, all UGTAs reconvened to share
Paper ID #39397Energizing the Engineering Pipeline through Agrivoltaics CitizenScience: Curriculum ShareDr. Michelle Jordan, Arizona State University Michelle Jordan is as associate professor in the Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College at Arizona State University. She also serves as the Education Director for the QESST Engineering Research Center. Michelleˆa C™s program of research focuses on social interactJanet M. AnkrumMelany CoatesCheryl CarswellAndrew CentanniMs. Mia Delarosa Mia DeLaRosa received her BA in in Elementary Education from Arizona State University in 2004. She went on to receive her Masters in Educational
. In the upcoming study, one of two prompts (anequation or a worked example relating to centroids and their calculation) will be provided infuture think aloud interviews to determine which prompt improves student problem solvingsuccess.AcknowledgementsSupport for this work was provided by the National Science Foundation under Award No.2301341. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation. Research work was conducted under institutional IRB protocols, IRB#1965654.References1. ABET, “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2020 – 2021 | ABET,” ABET, 2021. https://www.abet.org/accreditation
, Dr. Reustle’s research focuses on community-level consequences for shifts in species-interactions due to (1) climate change and environmental perturbations (i.e., drought/flood, high intensity storm-events), (2) changes in predator/parasite field (i.e., reason for and consequences of changes in abundance of predator(s) and parasites), and (3) changes in sensory regime and behavior (i.e., changes in the visual or chemosensory profile; altered fear response to predators and/or parasites). Dr. Reustle’s research intersects with and has expanded into habitat restoration and assessment where Dr. Reustle is interested in restoring habitat and ecosystem services. Dr. Reustle incorporates field and laboratory studies at
response x What did you enjoy most about this trip? Categorical x Explain the aspect(s) you enjoyed most Free response x Rate experiences for (1) educational benefit and Likert x (2) team building / networking: Transportation Friday evening activities Ski lift tour Snow making tour Open ski time Saturday evening events Rate Trip overall Likert x Final Comments Free response xResults / DiscussionThe pre and post surveys reveal that the participants on the field trip gained both educational andteam
learningavenues and career choices. References[1] “Zoom Video Conferencing, Web Conferencing, Webinars, Screen Sharing,” Zoom Video Conferencing , 2020. [Online]. Available: https://zoom.us/. [Accessed: 29-Dec- 2020].[2] Unknown. "Common Core State Standards." US Department of Education. https://www.ed.gov/k-12reforms/standards (accessed 2021).[3] S. Murphy, “Participation and achievement in technology education: the impact of school location and socioeconomic status on senior secondary technology studies,” International Journal of Technology and Design Education, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 349–366, 2019.[4] C. Maiorca, T. Roberts, C. Jackson, S. Bush, A. Delaney, M. J. Mohr
Kokomo 2300 S. Washington St., Kokomo, IN, 46902 Abstract IntroductionThe arrival of the Internet of Things (IoT) into our The growth of the Internet, in the past decade, hasdaily lives in various forms such as home appliances enabled exponential growth of over 26.66 billionand wearable devices has dominated Internet usage. connected devices in 2019, approximately a 57.81%This dominant behavior left network practitioners increase compared to 2015 [1]. This number iswith many questions to be answered related to IoT expected to grow significantly in the coming years
Interactive Multidisciplinary Curricula in a Residential Summer Program (Evaluation) Paper presented at 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana. 10.18260/p.26782 2. Cottrell, D. (2007, June), Outreach Initiative for Recruiting Women To Engineering: Doing A Good Deed For Girl Scouts Paper presented at 2007 Annual Conference & Exposition, Honolulu, Hawaii. 10.18260/1-2--2807 3. Michaeli, J., Jovanovic, V., Popescu, O., Djuric, A., & Yaprak, E. (2014). An Initial Look at Robotics-based Initiatives to Engage Girls in Engineering. Technology Interface International Journal, 14(2). 4. Demetry, C., & Sontgerath, S. (2013, June), Does a Middle School Intervention for Girls
Reasons Why Project Management Skills are Just as Important as Your Technical Degree | University of Maryland Project Management,” pm.umd.edu, Sep. 08, 2021. https://pm.umd.edu/2021/09/08/five-reasons-why-project-management-skills-are-just- as-important-as-your-technical-degree/ (accessed Oct. 02, 2023).[2] J. Kagan, “Importance of Project Management in Today’s Business Landscape,” niftypm.com, Jun. 19, 2023. https://niftypm.com/blog/importance-of-project-management/[3] “What is Project Management in Engineering | MEML@Rice,” engineering.rice.edu. https://engineering.rice.edu/academics/graduate-programs/online-meml/blog/engineering- project-management[4] S. Aggrawal and A. J. Magana, “Undergraduate student experience with
g s ce re e b rt ce rin rit dg ai Jo fo ilu en lG
, the thirdphase further reviewed capstone-related efforts to explore possible and effective practices within capstonedesign projects that might contribute to the development of multidisciplinary engineering education.Phase 1. Multidisciplinary Engineering Programs Accredited by ABETAs background, Farison and Newberry (2003) previously reported on accredited Engineering and EngineeringScience programs, and explored related historical trends to provide a macro-level perspective of such programs[4-5]. However, only Engineering (sometimes called General Engineering) and Engineering Science(s)programs were considered. From a micro perspective, these general engineering programs varied frominstitution to institution in curricular and student
4.37 4.57 Q 18 4.05 4.43 Q 19 4.84 4.43 Q 20 4.79 4.71 Q 21 4.16 4.43 Q 22 4.05 4.57 Average 4.4 4.5Q 1: I attended class regularly.Q 2: I prepared for class (e.g., assigned readings, online materials, etc.).Q 3: I completed the assigned work for the class.Q 4: I asked the instructor for help/guidance when I needed it.Q 5: The textbook(s) and other course resources enhanced my understanding of
, 2019.[2] J. G. Wells, “STEM Education: The Potential of Technology Education,” in 95th Annual Mississippi Valley Technology Teacher Education Conference, 2008.[3] M. ElZomor, C. Mann, K. D. Snitker, K. Parrish, M. Chester“Leveraging Vertically Integrated Courses and Problem-Based Learning to Improve Students ’ Performance and Skills,” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract. ASCE, vol. 144, no. 1, 2018.[4] S. Portz, “The Challenges of STEM Education,” 43rd Sp. Congr., vol. 2015, 2015.[5] M. Brzozowy et al., “Making STEM education attractive for young people by presenting key scientific challenges and their impact on our life and career perspectives,” INTED2017 Proc., pp. 9948–9957, 2017.[6] M. ElZomor, K. Parrish, C
Participation (IBP), the S-STEM Interdisciplinary Biochemistry Master Program (NC State University), and the HBCU-UP Im- plementation Project (Fayetteville State University). She is an active member of ASEE.Dr. Tonya Lynette Smith-Jackson, North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University Tonya Smith-Jackson, PhD, CPE: Tonya Smith-Jackson is Senior Vice Provost for Academic Affairs at N.C. A&T State University. Her teaching-learning research focuses on inclusive pedagogies and methods to measure inclusion to support academic success. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021Introducing Diverse Undergraduates to Computational ResearchThis paper
handicap parking space. Figure 1. Minimum Provisions for Accessible Parking (Department of Justice, 2010). The following are included in the basic minimum requirements, cited literally from the ADAParking Standard document (U.S. Department of Justice): • “Parking space shall be 96 inches wide minimum, marked to define the width, and maximum slope in all directions is 1:48.” • “Access aisle width is at least 60 inches, must be at the same level and the same length as the adjacent parking space(s) it serves.” • “Accessible parking spaces must be located on the shortest accessible route of travel to an accessible facility entrance.” • “The required number of accessible parking spaces must be calculated separately
program development. Recently, she co-developed the curriculum for the new Minor in Global Engineering offered by the CU Boulder College of Engineering and Applied Science starting in fall 2016. Dr. Sandekian earned B.S. and M.S. degrees in Aerospace Engineering Sciences at CU Boulder, a Spe- cialist in Education (Ed. S.) degree in Educational Leadership and Policy Studies from the University of Northern Colorado, and her Ph.D. in Higher Education Student Affairs Leadership at the University of Northern Colorado in December 2017. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Finding the Rainbow Needles in the Engineering Haystack: Connecting with a Hard-to-Reach
,collectingdataviaacomputerinterfaceanddescribingexperimentalresults.TheavailabilityandcostofmaterialsandinformationassociatedwithfuelcelldevelopmentmaketheMFCtechnologyandexcellentfitforstudentrelatedprojects.References1. UnitedNations,(2012).Waterforlifedecade. http://www.un.org/waterforlifedecade/africa.shtml2. Logan,B.,Hamelers,B.,Rozendal,R.,Schroder,U.,Keller,J.,Freguia,S.,Aelterman,P.,&3. Berman,J.,April2009.WHO:Waterbornediseaseisworld'sleadingkiller.Voiceof America.http://www.voanews.com/content/a-13-2005-03-17-voa34-67381152/ 274768.html4. Verstraete,W.(2006,July14).Microbialfuelcells:Methodologyandtechnology. http://pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021/es06050165. Paulson,L.(2012,August20).Microbialfuelcelllatrinepromisessanitation,power. http://www.rwlwater.com/microbial-fuel-cell-latrine-promises-sanitation-power/6. Davies,C.(2010,Aug23).Solarenergybringspowertoruralafrica.CNN,http:// www.cnn.com/2010/TECH/innovation/08/10
states “ASU is a comprehensivepublic research university, measured not by whom we exclude, but rather by whom we includeand how they succeed”. Postsecondary education faculty need to be aware of ASD students sincethey want the “same opportunity for success, not the right of success.”10Bibliography1. VanBergeijk, E., Klin, A., & Volkmar, F. (2008). Supporting more able students on the autism spectrum: college and beyond. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38, 1359-1370.2. White, S. W., Ollendick, T. H., & Bray, B. C. (2011). College students on the autism spectrum. Autism, 15(6), 683-701.3. Adreon, D., & Durocher, J. S. (2007). Evaluating the college transition needs of individuals with high- functioning
Response Mean 1 s 5 4 High Performance Computing1 and Big Data 15 8 5 1 3 1 33 2.27 Usage of HPC Integration in2 Real World Applications 13 8 6 2 2 2 33 2.45 Usage of Information to Impact K-16 Educator in3 Addressing/Supporting the 10 8 7 3 1 4 33 2.82 Computing Industry Workforce ShortageQuestion 14: What is your overall perception of the workshop
women STEM faculty. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering 21, 141-157, doi:10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2015011275 (2015).2 Herring, C. Does diversity pay?: Race, gender, and the business case for diversity. American Sociological Review 74, 208-224 (2009).3 Yoder, B. ASEE College Profiles. (American Society of Engineering Education, 2014).4 Locks, A. M., Hurtado, S., 1957-, Bowman, N. A. & Oseguera, L. Extending Notions of Campus Climate and Diversity to Students' Transition to College. Review of higher education 31 (2008).5 Sue, D. W., Capodilupo, C. M. & Holder, A. Racial microaggressions in the life experience of Black Americans. Professional Psychology: Research and
positionof being the co-chair of a department may be viewed more as simply an administrative postionladen with managerial responsibilities and not as a genuine leadership role.What can be surmised from this study is that on the whole engineering faculty are shifting intheir predilictions regarding gender biases. This may mark a tipping point when the work oforganizations such as the National Center for Women and Information Technology (NCWIT) 23,24 has begun to nudge attitudies and awareness of underrepresentation of women in engineeringand computing sciences and actually shift actions. References1 Fairweather, J. S. (2002). The mythologies of faculty productivity: Implications for institutional
understanding of the importance of linking to professional practice through involvement of the department’s or college’s existing Industrial Advisory Board (or equivalent); An acknowledgement of additional example strategies, such as increasing the stature of professor(s) of engineering practice and their role as change agents or connecting the work with professional master’s programs. An incorporation of scalability and adaptability considerations.After Riley’s keynote, the webinar transitioned to the panelists who discussed questions, such asWhat is revolutionary and not-so-revolutionary? What does it mean to start and sustain arevolution? The panelists were Elsa Villa from University of Texas at El Paso, Milo
American Association of Physics Teachers (AAPT) where he was vice president candidate, a member of the Committee on Research in Physics Education (RIPE) a member and chair of the International Education Committee and elected member of Leadership Organizing Physics Education Research Council (PERLOC ) in the period 2015-2018. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019Students’ perception of teaching practice in an active learning environmentAbstractPhysics Education Research has been very active since the late 70’s trying to reduce the gapbetween what the instructor teaches and what the students learn. One of the most importantresults of that research is the design of educational strategies and
., Aragon, M. C., Suchard, M. R. & Hurtado, S. (2014). Undergraduate teaching faculty: The 2013–2014 HERI Faculty Survey. Los Angeles: Higher Education Research Institute, UCLA. Available: http://www.heri.ucla.edu/monographs/HERI-FAC2014- monograph.pdf[10] Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the literature. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223-231.[11] Borrego, M., Froyd, J. E., & Hall, T. S. (2010, July). Diffusion of engineering education innovations: A survey of awareness and adoption rates in U.S. engineering departments. Journal of Engineering Education, pp. 185-207.[12] Lord S, & Camacho, M. (2007). Effective teaching practices: preliminary analysis of
Polytechnic State University San Luis Obispo Ph. D. Electrical Engineering and Information Technology, Vienna University of Technology M. S. Physics, University of Vienna M. S. Education Physics and Mathematics, University of Vienna Research Interests: Computer Science Education, Physics Simulation, Applied Computing c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Deep Learning and Artificial Intelligence: Project Collaboration across ClassesAbstract. Working in collaborative environments is an essential skill for computingprofessionals. In our program, students have significant team experience from previous classes;almost all of our classes in Cal Poly’s
. Applications were considered complete if they included an application form,personal statement, unofficial transcript(s), and at least one letter of recommendation.Applicant review occurred in two phases: initial screening and PI/mentor review. During theinitial screening, personal statements and recommendation letters were read by the screeningcommittee and scored via a shared rubric. The screening committee was comprised of the REUProgram Director and graduate students and postdoctoral researchers within ReNUWIt. Effortswere made to ensure that each application was read by the REU Program Director and at leastone other individual on the committee. At the end of the initial screening, each application wasbinned as “Yes,” “Maybe,” or “No.”Following the
excitedabout the idea of solving a real-world problem and adding value by using their creativity. Someworry about bringing a solution to life due to their little engineering experience so far. In week 2,there is a dip in motivation. Most students again find teamwork and discussion helpful. Somecomment heated discussion within their team and difficulty reaching consensus. During week 3,there is an increase in motivation. Many say they enjoy the hands-on rapid prototyping activity.Week 4’s planning activity such as coming up with a materials list gets some students excited.After week 5’s proposal presentation, many students comment that they find sharing their ideasand seeing other students’ ideas interesting. Week 6 is the first construction and
other student support programs like livinglearning community, research experience for undergraduates, and supplemental instructionthereby study their combined effect on overall student retention and graduate rates.References[1] Z. S. Wilson et al., "Hierarchical mentoring: A transformative strategy for improving diversity and retention in undergraduate STEM disciplines," Journal of Science Education and Technology, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 148-156, 2012.[2] P. B. Thayer, "Retention of students from first generation and low income backgrounds," 2000.[3] E. T. Pascarella, C. T. Pierson, G. C. Wolniak, and P. T. Terenzini, "First-generation college students: Additional evidence on college experiences and outcomes," The
various contextsfrom training to education. While the use of games varies substantially depending on thepurpose(s) and benefit(s) of the game provider and gamer, recent a recent literature surveyindicates that majority of attention has been paid on the affordance of the games in other wordsdeveloping and evaluating prototypes, while focus was comparably less on the actual use andeffectiveness of games [1]. Regardless of the effectiveness and generalizability of educationalgames, more and more serious games are integrated into engineering curricula as computer-based,manual, and virtual reality-type; and a scientific consensus is established on the fact that gamesand interactive simulations are more dominant for cognitive gain outcomes [5]; [1
) Structure; and 7) Peer review [24].Active learning exercisesALEx or active learning activities (ALA) is an instructional method where pre-plannedactivities in class make the students put to use the content that they have just been taught. Manydifferent ALA and ALEx exist [23], [25], which are either informal or graded. The plainestversion of ALEx is regular multiple choice questions, which the students have to solve duringlectures but ALEx also comes as small written exercises, sketch drawings, group workactivities or the like. In class, the instructor presents the theory or case(s) and instruct thestudents how to answer the upcoming ALEx. Typically, the ALEx activities open for studentsubmissions only for a few minutes thus, when conducting graded