instructor shouldintervene.References[1] J. Keller, Motivational design for learning and performance. New York: Springer, 2010.[2] K. Ashford-Rowe, J. Herrington, and C. Brown, “Establishing the critical elements that determine authentic assessment,” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, vol. 39, pp. 205–222, 2014.[3] A. Johnson and J. Swenson, “Open-ended modeling problems in a sophomore-level aerospace mechanics of materials courses,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition Proceedings. Tampa, FL: ASEE, Jun. 2019, p. 33146.[4] J. Swenson, A. Johnson, T. Chambers, and L. Hirshfield, “Exhibiting productive beginnings of engineering judgment during open-ended modeling problems in an introductory mechanics of
was supported by the Kern Entrepreneurial Engineering Network (KEEN) through a2020 Engineering Unleashed fellowship.References [1] D. R. Loker and S. A. Strom, "Innovative Laboratory Projects for a Measurements and Instrumentation Course," in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019.[2] D. Dannelley and E. Bryner, "Fundamental Instrumentation Course for Undergraduate Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering," in 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference, 2020.[3] E. Bryner and D. Dannelley, "Applied Instrumentation Course for Undergraduate Thermal- fluid Sciences," in 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference, 2020.[4] D. McDonald, "Data Acquisition in a Vehicle Instrumentation Course," in 2010 Annual Conference & Exposition
Adult Institution,” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Science Direct, 2013. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187704281303694X.[13] B. Neufeld & D. Roper, Coaching: A strategy for developing instructional capacity – promises and practicalities. Washington, DC: Aspen, 2003.[14] M.M. McDonald, V. Zeigler-Hill, J.K. Vrabel, and M. Escobar, “A single-item measure for assessing STEM identity.” Frontiers in Education Conference, vol.4, no. 78., pp. 1-15, 2019.[15] D. M. Riley, J. Karlin, J. L. Pratt & S. M. Matos, “Building Social Infrastructure for Achieving Change at Scale” Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Paper ID #19202, June 2017.[16] Journal of
Through Regional Conferences". 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, Washington, 2015, June. ASEE Conferences, 2015. https://peer.asee.org/24781 Internet. 11 Jan, 2019[17] Yong Zeng and John R. Duncan. "Women: Support Factors And Persistence In Engineering". 2007 Annual Conference & Exposition, Honolulu, Hawaii, 2007, June. ASEE Conferences, 2007. https://peer.asee.org/2771 Internet. 10 Jan, 2019[18] Christine Alvarado and Zachary Dodds, “Women in CS: An Evaluation of Three Promising Practices”, in SIGCSE’10, March 10-13, 2010, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.[19] Inna Pivkina, Enrico Pontelli, Rachel Jensen, and Jessica Haebe, “Young Women in Computing: Lessons Learned from an Educational &
Undergraduate Engineering Student Leadership," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 106, no. 1, pp. 44-70, 2017 2017.[5] B. E. Hughes, W. J. Schell, and B. Tallman, "Exploring the Relationship Between Students' Engineering Identity and Leadership," presented at the Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exhibition, Orlando, FL, June 15-19, 2019, 2019.[6] P. J. Kauffmann and W. J. Schell, "Understanding Engineering Leadership: A Critical Review Of The Literature," presented at the American Society for Engineering Management Annual Conference, Charlotte, NC, 2016.[7] M. Borrego, M. J. Foster, and J. E. Froyd, "Systematic literature reviews in engineering education and other developing
(ICACIT), IEEE, 2019, pp. 1–4.[8] O. Saidani, L. J. Menzli, A. Ksibi, N. Alturki, and A. S. Alluhaidan, “Predicting student employability through the internship context using gradient boosting models,” IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 46472–46489, 2022.[9] S. Mchugh, K. Quille, L. Carmody, and K. Nolan, “Developing an On-Campus Internship Model for Computing Students-An Alternative Experiential Learning Pathway,” presented at the Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on United Kingdom & Ireland Computing Education Research, 2022, pp. 1–7.[10] N. Kumar et al., “Factors Affecting the Future Career Pathway Decisions of Lower-income Computing Students,” presented at the 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2023.[11] İ
Annual Conference, Seattle, WA, June 2015.[14] O. Pierrakos, M. Borrego, and J. Lo, “Assessing students’ learning outcomes during summer undergraduate research experiences,” in Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference, Pittsburgh, PA, June 2008.[15] L. Massi, M. Georgiopolous, C. Y. Young, C. Geiger, P. Lancey, and D. Bhati, “Defining an evaluation framework for undergraduate research experiences,” in Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference, Vancouver, B.C., June 2011.[16] C. A. O’Riordan-Adjah, “Implementing research steps in undergraduate research,” in Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference, Tampa, FL, June 2019.[17] A. Ieta, “Implementation of an undergraduate research course,” in Proceedings
, theirresponses to the survey typically come one year after the end of the course. The survey collectsinformation about students’ post-college contact information, job or grad school prospects,assessment of ABET Outcomes and Performance Indicators, as well as ratings of various campusservices and facilities. The survey concludes with some open-ended responses. Responses to theprompt “Of the engineering professors at George Fox University, which several were the mostinfluential in your professional development and why?” that reference the instructor or HT from2010–2023 are discussed below.In addition, from an ASEE Educational Research and Methods Division email in late 2012, theinstructor learned about the Heat and Energy Concept Inventory (HECI), which
2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Design of Steel and Course Wood Structures Structural Analysis (CE403) (CE404) Credit Hours 3.5 3.0 Lessons 35 @ 75 minutes 40 @ 55 minutes Iteration - 1 2 3 4 5 6 Lessons on Wood 17% 15% 21.3% 22.5% 22.5% 22.5% 22.5% (% of total course) Credit Hours on 0.60 0.45 0.64 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 Wood (hrs) Course Grade for
softwaresystems that produce fair outcomes for individuals in society.Harms of Algorithm BiasThere are many reasons why an algorithm may be considered “biased.” Incomplete or faultydata is one reason. In other instances, it may be the choice of data that is being selected fordecision making. As an example of the latter, in a 2019 paper [4] in Science, “Dissecting racialbias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations,” authors Obermeyer et al. foundevidence that a widely used commercial prediction algorithm for determining health risk wasconsistently scoring black patients as being lower risk for health issues than white patients, eventhough, in their study, the black patients had significant health risks that were being missed bythe
this collaboration to the curriculum of both courses. (SeeTable 3.) There were several program differences that needed to be addressed, however.First, SPM was only offered in the fall at MTU, so the collaboration could not take place duringthe spring. No action was taken to address this difference, so the collaboration was applied duringthe fall 2019 and fall 2020 semesters, but not the spring 2020 and spring 2021 semesters.Second, both courses at MTU were taught by the same instructor. No action needed to be taken toaddress this difference.Third, TSP and SPM had no overlapping instruction time. The instructor for these coursesproposed a program change to add an overlapping lab hour, but the proposal did not carrythrough. To address this, the
Griffith (BE) and David Trumper (MechE) at MIT. Prior to that, Dr. Kassis obtained a Ph.D. in Bioengineering and an M.S. in Mechanical Engineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology in Atlanta, GA, and a B.Eng. in Electronic and Communications Engineering from the University of Nottingham, UK. Dr. Kassis has lived for extended amounts of time in the Philippines, Canada, UK, Lebanon, Syria, and since 2008, the United States. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Paper ID #25447 Dr. Kassis is currently the lead instructor for the School of Engineering’s New Engineering Education
Abdelnour Nocera, Anicia Peters, Susan Dray, and Stephen Kimani. 2016. A living HCI curriculum. In Proceedings of the First African Conference on Human Computer Interaction. 229–232.15. Ida Larsen-Ledet, Nathalie Bressa, and Jo Vermeulen. 2019. Reflections on Teaching a Mandatory HCI Course to Computer Science Undergraduates. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.16. Leydens, Jon A., and Juan C. Lucena. "Making the invisible visible: Integrating engineering-for-social-justice criteria in humanities and social science courses." In 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. 2016.17. Blaise W Liffick. 2004. Introducing assistive technology in an HCI course. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin 36
education: Fit for purpose? Unpublished manuscript.Sottile, B. J., Canale, A., Xia, Y., Kane, T., & Cutler, S. (2024). Work in progress: Evaluating the current state of the first-year seminar program at Penn State University. Paper presented at the 2024 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Portland, OR.Verma, J. P., & Abdel-Salam, A.-S. G. (2019). Testing statistical assumptions in research. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119528388Xu, Z., Zayed, T., Lin, Y.-H., Wang, S., & Li, H. (2020). Relationship between social media and ASCE code of ethics: Review and case-based discussion. Journal of Civil Engineering Education, 146(2). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.2643-9115.0000005
Undergraduate Engineering Education. Cambridge,MA:WorldwideCDIOInitiative.Crawley, E. F., & Hosoi, A. E. (2019). Moving Forward with the New Engineering Education Transformation (NEET)programatMIT-Buildingcommunity,developingprojects,andconnectingwithindustry.In2019 ASEEAnnualConference&Exposition,Tampa,Florida.Crawley,E.F.,&Hosoi,A.P.,&Mitra,A.B.(2018).RedesigningundergraduateengineeringeducationatMIT–the New Engineering Education Transformation (NEET) initiative. In 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition,SaltLakeCity,Utah.deGraaff,E.,Markkula,M.,Demlová ,M.,Kuru,S.,&Peltola,H.(2007).Innovativelearningandteachingmethods. In C. Borri & F. Maffioli (Eds.), TREE: Teaching and research in engineering in Europe
, 2019b). However, adoption of technologytools for widespread use is often conceived from a turn-key lens, with professional developmentfocused on procedural competencies and fidelity of implementation as the goal (Mills & Ragan,2000; O’Donnell, 2008). Educators are given the tool with initial operating instructions, then lefton their own to implement it in particular instructional contexts. There is little emphasis on theinevitable instructional decisions around incorporating the tool (Hodge, 2019) or on sustainableincorporation of technologies into existing instructional practice (Forkosh-Baruch et al., 2021).We consider the take-up of a technology tool as an emergent, rather than a prescribed process(Henderson et al., 2011). In this WIP
Society of Professional Engineers, Cobb Chapter, a Member of the American Society of Engineering Educators ASEE, and a Member of the Institute of Transportation Engineers, USA. Dr. Okhio has carried out experimental and numerical investigations of, and developed statistical analysis tools and computer codes, for the numerical simulation/calculation of complex flows. He has been co-PI in a few successful research efforts including those related to NASA, WPAB, GE, NSF, NRO, ARO, ORNL, Honeywell, KCP, to name a few. He has also been the co-PI on Department of Energy sponsored Project called Minority Serving Institution Partnership Project MSIPP on Advance Manufacturing which involved the (1) use of research activities to
a variety of fields [2] and have yielded improved graduate student performancespecifically in cardiovascular, respiratory, and renal physiology [3]. To address the challenge ofengaging the wide diversity of incoming physiology experience among our graduate students, wedeveloped a partially flipped graduate physiology course that emphasized mathematicalmodeling and computational exercises in class. In this Work-in-Progress paper, we will describethe pedagogical approach and preliminary analysis of learning outcomes and student feedbackfrom the past two iterations of this flipped course.Flipped classroom approach to engineering graduate physiologyIn 2019 and 2020, a total of 53 graduate students were enrolled in the core EngineeringPhysiology
, 2018.[2] V. Eubanks, Automating inequality: How high-tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor. St. Martin’s Press, 2018.[3] C. C. Perez, Invisible women: Exposing data bias in a world designed for men. Random House, 2019.[4] D. Norman, The design of everyday things: Revised and expanded edition. Basic books, 2013.[5] D. E. Forsythe, “New Bottles, Old Wine: Hidden Cultural Assumptions in a Computerized Explanation System for Migraine Sufferers,” Med. Anthropol. Q., vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 551– 574, 1996.[6] National Science Foundation, “Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering,” 2017. https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2017/nsf17310/digest/occupation/overall.cfm (accessed Jun. 23
-128,2016.[2] J. Leonard, A. Buss, A. Unertl and M. Mitchell, "USING ROBOTICS AND GAMEDESIGN TO PROMOTE PATHWAYS TO STEM", in Annual Meeting of the North AmericanChapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Tucson, AZ,2016, pp. 1487-1494.[3] A. Barco, R. Walsh, A. Block, K. Loveys, A. McDaid and E. Broadbent, "Teaching SocialRobotics to Motivate Women into Engineering and Robotics Careers", in 2019 14th[4] ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), Daegu, Korea(South), 2019, pp. 518-519.[4] B. Brand, M. Collver and M. Kasarda, "Motivating Students With Robotics", The ScienceTeacher, vol. 75, no. 4, pp. 44-49, 2008.[5] E. M. Silk and C. D. Schunn, "Using robotics to teach mathematics
,” International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being, vol. 13, no. 1, p.1508171, 2018.[6] S. J. Bork & J. Mondisa, “Science, Engineering, and Mathematics Graduate Student Mental Health: Insights from the Healthy Minds Network Dataset,” presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida. https://peer.asee.org/33255, 2019.[7] J. Hefner & D. Eisenberg, “Social support and mental health among college students,” American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, vol. 79, no. 4, pp. 491-499, 2009.[8] J. Hunt & D. Eisenberg, “Mental health problems and help-seeking behavior among college students,” Journal of Adolescent Health, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 3-10, 2010.[9] D. M. Wilson, P
when STEM careers are set to grow by 12.6%over the next 10 years, 5.2% faster than other occupations (Burke, 2019).Additionally, STEM is facing a diversity crisis with a lack of representation from women andsome races. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, women make up only 15.9% of the totalengineering and architecture workforce (Employed Persons by Detailed Occupation, Sex, Race,and Hispanic or Latino Ethnicity, 2019). This creates an issue, as STEM peer contact correlateswith STEM retention among females (Hilts, Part & Bernacki, 2018). Further, according to theBureau of Labor Statistics, whites make up 79.3% percent of the total engineering andarchitecture workforce (Employed Persons by Detailed Occupation, 2019). Minorities
demographicrepresentation of the undergraduate and graduate student populations are starklydifferent with WPI having far less diversity than the Worcester public school. The largemajority of students at WPI are white making up 61% of the total undergraduate studentpopulation, 11.9% students of unknown ethnicity, 11% Non – resident alien, 8.9%Hispanic/Latinx and roughly a combined 8% Asian and Black or African American. Ourgraduate student population is far less with only 8.5% of our total graduate studentpopulation as underrepresented students in STEM. However in the last three years ourundergraduate women population has grown to 42% as of Fall 2019. 4In response to our own
include knowledge engineering, as well as knowledge and information management. She is a mem- ber of the Board of Advisors at West Point for the Department of Systems Engineering. She is also a member of several professional societies including ASEE, ASEM, ASME, and EMH. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Effective Online Teaching Practices during a Covid EnvironmentAbstractOver the last two decades online teaching has had its supporters and opponents. There werethose who believe that online education would level the playing field, allowing all portions of thepopulation access to education. There were those who believe that online education could
Engineering Diversity Program,” presented at the 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2017. Accessed: Feb. 12, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/fostering-an-asset-mindset-to-broaden-participation-through-the-transfor mation-of-an-engineering-diversity-program[4] Society of Women Engineers, “SWE Research Update: Women in Engineering by the Numbers (Nov. 2019) - All Together,” 2019. https://alltogether.swe.org/2019/11/swe-research-update-women-in-engineering-by-the-numb ers-nov-2019/#_edn3 (accessed Sep. 17, 2021).[5] E. T. Cline, “Promoting Academic Success of Economically Disadvantaged, STEM-Interested, First- and Second-Year Undergraduate Students via the ACCESS in STEM Program at University
selected randomly from the entirecollection of Cards with the Exemplar designation. These cards were selected as controls to givea picture of what a “typical” well-written pedagogical EML intervention might include, allowingus to see differences that a workshop that focuses specifically on Makerspace EML pedagogymight create in the class environment.Results and DiscussionOf the 45 faculty who have attended the full duration of the workshop at least once, 30 created29 unique Cards based on their B-Fab project. It is worth noting two observations about theseCards, which are semi-public publications of class content available to any educator whoregisters with the EngineeringUnleashed website. First, that the 2019 workshop used Cards asthe platform
professor in Purdue University’s School of Engineering Technology, where she serves as associate head. She served on the Vibration Institute’s Board of Directors for nine years, and is an active member of the VI Academic and Certification Scheme Committees. She is a Fellow of ASEE and a member of ASME. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Designed Beam Deflections Lab ProjectAbstractStructural mechanics courses generally are challenging for engineering technologystudents. The comprehensive learning process requires retaining knowledge from priormechanics, materials, and mathematic courses and connecting theoretical concepts topractical applications. The various methods for
Paper ID #28705Education and Research at the Nexus of Food, Energy, and Water with a3-Axis Farming RobotDr. Abhijit Nagchaudhuri, University of Maryland, Eastern Shore Dr. Abhijit Nagchaudhuri is currently a Professor in the Department of Engineering and Aviation Sciences at University of Maryland Eastern Shore. He is a member American Society for Mechanical Engineers (ASME), American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) and, American Society for Agricultural and Biological Engineers(ASABE) and is actively involved in teaching and research in the fields of (i) robotics and mechatronics, (ii)remote sensing and precision
, Western Carolina University Lane Graves Perry, III (PhD, ME, MEd, BBA) currently serves as executive director of the Center for Community Engagement and Service Learning at Western Carolina University, a Carnegie Community Engaged campus. His reserch interests include community engagement/service-learning, global citizen- ship development, and public health. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Engagement in Practice (EIP): An Engineering Service-Learning Course in Collaboration with an ART 2D Design Course to Serve Young People on the Autism Spectrum Using the Touch Board™This course is the first designated “Service-Learning Course” from the College of
. Additionally, the student that was notcommitted was considering a career in engineering/technology. All students indicated that theyhad a very positive experience and that they would “recommend the program to their friends”. For the final part of the project, students presented and published their results. Since theend of the summer, students have made presentations at three national/regional conferences(including ASEE), and two more students will present their findings in the spring. Additionally,most of the students have submitted their work to high school science competitions includingRegeneron, JSHS (the Junior Mathematics, Science and Humanities Symposium), and NYCSEF(New York City Science and Engineering Fair), the winners of which will