aspect of human dimension (both self and others) in a science/engineering course like MS can be a daunting task. Learning outcomes could be “activelyparticipate in class discussions; avoid plagiarism in report writing and properly cite publishedsources; work in teams on mini-project, swapping roles as team member and leader; andconduct peer assessment of project team members.” Learning activities could be lecture andclass discussion on team work, and professional and ethical responsibility (includingplagiarism, citation and referencing); and project presentations and discussions. Assessmentmethods could be keeping records of active class participation (individual and group); recordsof meetings with project teams for individual and team work
this form of instruction is becoming commonplace in K-12education. A site with similar resources, but oriented toward higher education is “OLT:Flipped Classroom Project” from the University of Queensland. It has case studies inseveral disciplines, including Engineering Design. It has synopses of various ways to useclass time, including case studies, peer learning, problem-based learning and project-basedlearning. It gives some advice on how to measure learning gains. Flip It! Consulting hasa blog with posts on various aspects of flipping that will be useful to educators in manydisciplines. A notable collection of links and references to other resources is provided byRobert Talbert at Grand Valley State University. His intention is to turn it
involvedin traditional lecture were found to be 1.5 times more likely to fail as compared to those in classes withsignificant active learning. Some of the active learning techniques are peer review, flipped classrooms,hands-on technology, and cooperative group problem solving. Here is a brief description of thesemethods [10].In “peer review”, students are asked to complete an individual homework assignment or short paper. Onthe day the assignment is due, students submit one copy to the instructor to be graded and one copy totheir partner. Each student then takes their partner's work and, depending on the nature of theassignment, gives critical feedback, and corrects mistakes in content and/or grammar.In the “flipped classroom”, class time is devoted
collaborative learning activities gives students more opportunities in developingconceptual learning through social interactions among peers. This we can refer to as conceptgroup learning activity.In a group environment, conflicts and controversies are resolved through proper explanation,justification; reflection and search for new knowledge.8 Student groups often come up withmutual support or solution via elaborative help that stimulates reorganization of thoughts andidentification of knowledge gaps thereby generating solution seeking ability among the studentgroup members. These circumstances also help students developing elaborate conceptualunderstanding by making use of new analogies, revisiting and reformulating their knowledge,which becomes more
(Outcome E). A bigportion of the project deliverables was four to five presentations made both to the client and otherpeers at the program, and the writing of several technical reports. After each presentation, the teamreceived feedback from the faculty and peers on the content and delivery of the presentation andtheir technical writing skills. Each section of the final technical report was reviewed and gradedby the team mentor (Outcome G). One of the deliverables was the contextualization documentthat reports what significance the final design might have on the environment, health and safetyconcerns, economics, ethics, etc. (Outcome H). Based on the technical evidence and submitteddocuments, these outcomes were evaluated, and the faculty mentor
:• Identification of the lesson topic. Typically, one major topic is identified for each lesson.• Identification of lesson objectives. The objectives should be identified first, so that the lesson content focuses on what the students are expected to accomplish. Additionally, writing of objectives at different levels of Bloom’s taxonomy8 allows higher order thinking (or “independent thinking”, see next section) to be utilized.• Preparation of a lesson outline. The outline lays out the general order and hierarchy of the presentation.• Preparation of board notes. Board notes are a specific technique utilized in the T4E and ExCEEd workshops, and have been described previously.1,2 Briefly, board notes lay out on a piece of paper exactly
Curriculum, Proceedings, 2002 ASEE Annual Conference, Montreal.20. Rose, A.T. (2001). Using the Peer Review Process to Implement Writing Assignments in an Engineering Technology Course, Proceedings, 2001 ASEE Annual Conference, Albuquerque, NM. Page 13.1257.12
for each team member, credit was given for inclusion of a description ofeach student’s work contribution. Engineering curriculum designers often struggle to include meaningfulwriting assignments in undergraduate programs [8], yet scientific writing is a highly valued skill in theengineering sector [9]. In their teaching experience, the authors have observed that students often arechallenged by writing assignments hence the inclusion of the checklist requirements to prepare a logicallyflowing and wellwritten final proposal with proper formatting and appropriate citation of crediblesources. It was highly suggested that groups perform peer editing and utilize the oncampus writingtutor program.Discussion & ResultsConsultations &
andScientists. (pp. 1-8). Hoboken: IEEE Press.21. MIT OpenCourseWare. (2006). “The Scientific Publication Cycle.” Materials Science and EngineeringTutorials. Information Exploration: Becoming a Savvy Scholar. Available at http://video.mit.edu/watch/scientific-publication-cycle-4356/17. Page 25.799.10Additional ReadingClarke, J.B. (2011). Viewpoints. Seeking a Paradigm Shift for Engineering Librarian Instruction. Issues inScience and Technology Librarianship, 66. Retrieved from http://www.istl.org/11-summer/viewpoint.htmlFosmire, M. (2010). Calibrated Peer Review: A New Tool for Integrating Information Literacy Skills in Writing-Intensive
; facilitated by library staffTechnical writing: Presented the basic ideas for strong technical writing; examples and class activitiesOral presentation: Presented the basic ideas for strong technical oral presentationsEditing writing: Groups traded drafts of their papers and peer evaluated themExhibit feedback: Feedback on the students’ ideas for their exhibit from staff of the science museumGroup work: The students worked on the final project in groups throughout the semester Page 15.1305.4At the beginning of the course, the students’ demographic information was
describes characterization of the instrumentswithin ASSESS as well as lessons learned throughout the project’s development. In addition, twoexamples are offered to describe ways in which ASSESS may be used by the engineeringeducation community.Instrument CharacterizationOver the life of the project, a variety of instruments were identified for inclusion in the ASSESSdatabase. In the first year, instruments were identified by searching peer-reviewed journalarticles, using branching techniques from reference sections of papers and reports, andidentifying innovative projects that may have developed and employed evaluation instruments.While comprehensive, this three-pronged strategy proved to be somewhat challenging forlocating instruments. Thus, the
the pedagogical approaches and classroomstructure in their HSS lectures and tutorials. If they manage to enroll in a course withcomparatively low engineering representation, they often feel isolated from their peers, and ifthey choose to enroll in an HSS elective with high out of department enrollment they are oftenshepherded into a non-arts and science lecture section or tutorial with no change in the way thatmaterial is delivered or discussed. While they may watch different modes of thought at work, it’sunlikely that they are proficient in their use or convinced of their benefit by course’s end. Andwhile another calendar entry strongly encourages students to “plan their complementary studieselectives in accordance with their career
. Thestudent is the one who finalizes his or her choice.First class after the mid-term break:The instructor officially asks each student to finalize his or her choice for a topic. Theinstructor makes it an official homework assignment. In this assignment, the instructorasks each student to write a paragraph on his or her topic, and on what he or she intendsto do subsequently. The instructor examines every topic very carefully, and meetsprivately with each student to make sure that the chosen topic meets the project’s criteria.If needed, the instructor asks the students to make appropriate revisions to their chosentopics. The instructor and students finalize the topics. Students are ready then to startworking on their projects. Between this class and
engineering which need to be taken intoconsideration. Some scholars and educators have predicted that the barriers that discourageunder-represented minorities from achieving success in science and engineering, pointed to suchfactors as:• inadequate academic preparation• substandard educational resources• mismatched social and academic expectations• lack of encouragement• psychological intimidation• unstable familial and financial circumstances• inadequate peer support• lack of role modeling/mentoring• low expectations by science and engineering faculty• poor/uninspired instruction and advising by science/engineering faculty• racism(Reichert & Absher, 1997)1In recognizing the aforementioned social and cognitive factors which may negatively
., Löfström, A., McDermott, R., and Russell, L. Intercultural Competence in Global Collaboration Courses in Computer Engineering, Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics, San Francisco, USA, 2012.[4] Cajander, Å., Daniels, M., McDermott, R and von Konsky, B. “Assessing Professional Skills in Engineering Education”, Australian Computer Science Communications, vol 33, no 2, pp 145-154, 2011.[5] Cajander, Å. Daniels, M. and McDermott, R. On valuing peers: theories of learning and intercultural competence. Computer Science Education, 22(4):319–342, 2012. [6] Cajander, Å., Daniels, M., Peters, A., and McDermott, R. Critical Thinking, Peer-Writing, and the Importance
bending configurations.On the first day of class, the students form teams of 5 to 6 students per team. Each team picks itschoice of a vehicle, machine or system from which they will pick all mechanical components foranalysis and design in the course. Each team is required to carry out four mechanical componentprojects and write project reports and make presentations. Each project covers a time period ofthree to four weeks. For example, fasteners and springs projects are projects that require threeweeks; bearings and gears projects require four weeks. Each team makes a presentation on eachof the four projects during the semester. The presentations are judged by engineers fromindustry.The reports and presentations are required to cover analysis and
faculty mentorship and career outcomes, includingnumber of peer-reviewed articles, number of conference presentations, salary, and jobsatisfaction? Previous studies on mentoring faculty have largely focused on medical fields (Levinsonet al., 1991; Palepu et al., 1998; Reid et al., 2012). Our study extends the literature by focusingon faculty working across a wider range of fields, including engineering, science, health, andsocial sciences, as well as across different academic institutions, by analyzing nationallyrepresentative data from the National Science Foundation Early Career Doctorates Survey(ECDS). Research findings demonstrate whether the likelihood of having a formal/informalmentor differs across faculty subgroups, and identify
for Engineering Education, 2019 Development and Assessment of an Undergraduate Research CommunityAbstractLiterature suggests the benefits to undergraduate research include improving students’understanding of the research process, their resilience, and their ability to persist through failure.However, at primarily undergraduate institutions, there are a number of challenges in making theundergraduate research experience successful for both students and faculty mentors. First, there isa significant burden on faculty mentors who, along with designing a research project, are typicallyindividually advising students, training them in reading and writing about research, and critiquingposters and presentations. These are skills which could be
making and technical writing, three technology-policy electives, and a three course capstone series. The first course in the series providesstudents with highly scaffolded assignments to practice skills learned in both our program andtheir technical programs while also learning project management skills. The last two courses arethe EPP Projects course where students work to structure and solve a large complex problemwith multiple dimensions in an interdisciplinary group. The EPP Projects course is taken inaddition to the design requirement course of the traditional engineering program. All EPPstudents take the EPP Projects course twice, typically once in the Junior year and once in theSenior year, or twice during Senior year. Each EPP Project is
question; no student's question was professor-rated above a 4.The common problem seen was an inability to write correct and precise English.Keywords: Crowdsourcing, rating, authoring, student-made content, web-native content,interactive content, programming, computer science, digital learning, digitally-enhancededucation, online learning.IntroductionTextbooks are giving way to online interactive material[15][20][23]. Interactive materialbenefits student learning with immediate feedback and higher levels of engagement[8],which may be a better match to a modern student's learning style.However, interactive material is hard to make, whether authoring a new textbook orconverting an existing textbook. One possibility is to have students help create
learning occurs, such as peer to peer discussions, students are still sitting.Learning science has shown that the brain and physical activity are connected. An active body canlead to an active mind. Significant work has been done on how to create intentional movement inelementary and middle school classrooms, but it is limited in higher education settings.This paper discusses how an “escape room” learning activity has been implemented and assessedin two small-sized engineering programs, York College of Pennsylvania and Iron RangeEngineering. Escape rooms are a physical adventure game to challenge players, where they mustsolve a series of puzzles to escape the room in a given time limit. In this activity, using movementto review content in
Cross6, learning communities are more thanjust another curricular fad. Why are educators so impressed with learning communities? Crossargues the reasons fit into three categories: “philosophical (because learning communities fit intoa changing philosophy of knowledge), research based (because learning communities fit withwhat research tells us about learning), and pragmatic (because learning communities work)”(original italics, p. 4).In this paper we will describe the Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering (ABE) first-yearlearning community at Iowa State University, a learning community that includes linked courses,a living community option, peer mentors and tutors, faculty-student dinners, and service learningopportunities. We have found that
promote a sense of community where learning (which includes admissions of“not knowing”) is welcomed, and therefore are not aligned with HPL framework four lenses1, 2.Tablet PCsIn an increasingly collaborative, mobile and globally inter-connected environment, UDLAPenvisions ubiquitous computing as a natural, empowering component of every teaching, learning,and research activity. UDLAP is committed not only to adopting and adapting technologies to allits scholarly endeavors, but also to playing an active role in their development4, 7. Tablet PCscombine a standard notebook computer with a digitizing screen and a pen-like stylus device toproduce a computer that allows ease of input of natural writing and drawing. Pedagogically,applications for the
, most students Page 22.1314.9find they no longer outperform most of their peers. All students were more confident in theirwriting and speaking preparation at the end of the first year. It may be that through the course oftheir first year, they found their writing and speaking abilities were on the same level as theirfellow engineering freshmen.Table 7: Comparisons of confidence in preparation at end of first year by quartiles based onPSVT:R score. p’s reported inside table are statistical significance of difference between aresponse and the response from the group that scored 21 and below on the PSVT:R. PSVT:R score 28
to the project sponsor. When a colleague asks about the resolution to the design concerns, the P.E. tells your colleague that if they raise the concern again the P.E. will have them fired. How ethical is it for the P.E. to act this way? [Likert scale] How ethical would your peers think it is for the P.E. to act this way? [Likert scale] How ethical is it in the present-day engineering profession for the P.E. to act this way? [Likert scale] Would you have made the same decision as the P.E.? Why or why not? [Open-ended question] What would your response be if you were the colleague who asked about the resolution to the design concerns? Why would that be
-year scholar create a project proposal that isreviewed by the Office of Undergraduate Research. Faculty are encouraged to write theseproposals for a general audience and to write in such a way that first-year students will want tojoin that project. In the most recent year, 82 projects were submitted, with 8 rejected for variousreasons (e.g., missing sections of the application). The final 74 were posted online, and the studentapplication portal was then opened. In the past year, the College of Engineering and EngineeringTechnology had the most projects (17), followed by WellStar College of Health and HumanServices (11), Radow College of Humanities and Social Sciences (10), College of Computing andSoftware Engineering (9), and College of
college student participation as well as30% Black and Hispanic students. The NHERI-REU Program also collects qualitative and quantitative data on the progressof students’ preparation of scholarly work including their self-efficacy and confidence levelsthroughout the program. This paper will include quantitative pre- and post-program data to showstudents’ increased confidence and levels of self-efficacy. An important element of the program is the multiple points of support for students. Thesesupports include faculty, graduate students, peer, and program mentors. The structure of thesupport system and the community building activities throughout the REU program also includecareer development workshops, a NHERI faculty and professional
thatstudents practice their understanding of the concept through examples and peer discussions. Forexample, in a typical engineering economics class, the instructor will assign a problem requiringstudents to draw cash flow diagrams and determine cash flow equivalencies. Students may be putin groups to discuss the problem as the instructor walks around in the classroom to check onstudents. The Covid-19 pandemic however removed such face-to-face classroom discussionsamong students and instructors. During the pandemic, methods such as flipped classroom,online breakout sessions, peer assessment and self-assessment were used to engage students. Inthe context of this study, students also engaged in self-assessment (self-grading). This studyreports initial
program onthe students’ affective and learning experience. To this end, a survey was administered to theeight students who participated in the program, after completion of the projects. All studentsparticipated in the survey, and the results revealed that 62.5% of the students reported beingextremely satisfied with the robotics program, including working with their peers and interactingwith the faculty. The students expressed that they found the academic program experienceenjoyable and useful in helping them to identify their future college interests and majors.IntroductionEducational robotics offers a stimulating and enjoyable environment for young individuals, whilesimultaneously introducing them to technological advancements. A growing number
Paper ID #34889Development of Multidisciplinary, Undergraduate-Led Research Program inSoft RoboticsMs. Adia Radecka, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign I’m an undergraduate student studying Electrical Engineering at the University of Illinois. My focus is in the bioengineering subdivision: imaging and sensing. I have experience working with SoftRobotics, Arduino, and writing literature review. Traveling is a passion of mine, I have studied abroad in Rus- sia, Ecuador, Bolivia, and Italy. I love meeting new people, developing new experiences, and solving problems.Ms. Alyssa Bradshaw, University of Illinois at