Paper ID #46946Using digital twin to introduce sustainable manufacturing in engineering educationDr. Anis Fatima, Michigan Technological University I am an accomplished academician in the Department of Manufacturing Mechanical Engineering Technology at Michigan Tech.I have developed and delivered a wide range of courses for graduate and postgraduate level and have supervised numerous PhD and Masters projects. My research is established and focused on digitalization and sustainability of manufacturing processes. My expertise covers optimization and developing processes that reduce environmental impact and yet cost
Paper ID #47033When Life Gives you Lemons, Make Lemonade: The Unique Challenges andStrengths of Low-Income Transfer Students Pursuing an Engineering Degree(Research)Anna-Lena Dicke, University of California, Irvine Dr. Dicke is an Associate Project Scientist within the School of Education at the University of California, Irvine. In her research, she aims to understand how students’ motivation and interest in the STEM fields can be fostered to secure their educational persistence and long-term career success. Trying to bridge the gap between theory and practice, she is currently involved in an NSF-funded project aimed at
. She holds a Master of Engineering degree from both the Shibaura Institute of Technology (2010) and UTM (2011). After completing her doctorate in 2016 from UTM, she serves Faculty of Electrical Engineering (FKE), UTM as a Senior Lecturer. Currently, she is the Director of the UTM Centre for Engineering Education (CEE) and holds the position of Vice President at the Society for Engineering Education Malaysia (SEEM). Her area of expertise is in the fields of IoT, mobility management, service-learning, AI in education, design thinking, and engineering education. She consults nationally and internationally in alternative assessment and Outcome-Based Education (OBE), Student-Centered Learning (SCL), Project-Based
to challenges. (Subject #1)In contrast, subject #6 discussed low identity importance in the context of teamwork: When I- when I'm working in a group I'm not like, oh, I'm facing a lot of challenges because of what I have. [referring to their neurodivergent identity] (Subject #6)Theme: Attitudes toward teamwork in generalThe code attitudes toward teamwork in general, covered any blanket statements, generalattitudes, opinions, or sentiments students have about working in teams. Examples of this couldinclude: if they enjoy group projects or prefer to work on their own; if they see teamwork asvaluable to their learning. Subjects #3 and #12 discuss the different ways their neurodivergentidentities impact how they feel about
as an innovative tool for enhancing environmental education[18].According to McNally and Andrade, Minecraft has the potential to impact the way people learn about andinteract with the natural world [19]. Building a house for one's own use and aesthetic appeal is a commonfirst project for amateur builders, according to Harrison and Gesthuizen [20]. In addition, children cangain a lot of understanding about sustainable living ideas, challenges, and opportunities by touring avirtual city [21].Studies involving pre-service teachers found that CAD aids learning retention. Doğan and Kahramansuggest that Tinkercad's spatial interface can enhance students' interests, attitudes, and motivations [22].Mohapatra et al. stated that Tinkercad is
. Taylor, University of Colorado Boulder Jennifer Taylor is the director of pre-college engineering with the College of Engineering and Applied Science at the University of Colorado Boulder. She leads the Pre-College Engineering Education Program, engaging K-12 students in hands-on engineering experiences to broaden STEM education impacts and supporting K-12 educators to increase teacher capacity in classroom engineering education. Jennifer led the Creative Engineering Design project to advance the NSF-funded ASPIRE Engineering Research Center’s roadway electrification efforts in the pre-college engineering space.Dr. Ivonne Santiago, University of Texas at El Paso Dr. Ivonne Santiago is an Associate Professor of Civil
both projects, we see how the students leverage engineeringpractices to show care for their community. Figure 3 shows a picture of both design prototypes.Figure 3: Fun Box and Folder HolderII. Amplifying parental voice and seeding new power dynamics at RPP mtgs From the RPP meetings, we were able to explore interactions between the students andtheir family. In one particular meeting, parents reviewed the results of the EfSC schoolcommunity survey and their child’s engineering design prototype. Families also reflected on theirexperiences collaborating as co-designer of an engineering curriculum for their middle schooler. When asked to characterize the affordances of this partnership from a parent’s point ofview, parents noted how
incorporating liberative pedagogies into a traditional technical engineering coursein thermodynamics. Riley discusses several course reforms suggested by liberal pedagogies andassesses those reforms. The reforms do bear some overlap with our study as they are ‘big ideas’rooted in a liberal arts context. Some examples of overlapping reforms include 1) creatingcommunity, 2) ethics, 3) de-centering Western civilization in the engineering classroom, and 4)problematizing science as objectivity and normalizing mistakes. Riley’s work succeeds inincorporating concepts from the liberal arts into engineering coursework for engineering students.Our project differs because we are trying to understand how engineering student curiosity can beleveraged to increase
education institutions, small businesses, and municipalities to secure funding and implement innovative programs. Her multifaceted background positions her uniquely at the intersection of engineering practice, education, and organizational development.Ms. Alicia Boudreaux Kiremire MS, PE, PMP, FlowStream Management LLC Ms. Kiremire is a grant consultant specializing in collaborative STEM education grants. She holds degrees in both engineering and education and has over 18 years of professional experience. Beginning as a grant writer then a project manager, Alicia has since moved into a training, consulting, and evaluation role. She is the Creator of the Complete Grant System and has worked on projects with budgets up to $6
education more responsive to all learners. Halkiyo taught and worked at a university in Ethiopia, where he was also a principal investigator of the ”Engendering Higher Education Curricula” research project. Dr. Halkiyo is a Fulbright-Hays Fellow, where he conducted his dissertation research on global education policy transfer from the global West/North to the global South/East, specifically Ethiopia, Africa.Maimuna Begum Kali, Florida International University Maimuna Begum Kali is a Ph.D. candidate in the Engineering and Computing Education program at the School of Universal Computing, Construction, and Engineering Education (SUCCEED) at Florida International University (FIU). She earned her B.Sc. in Computer Science and
project aims to equip engineering students with essential data analysisskills to prepare them for the modern labor market. The study's specific objectives are as follows:to promote evidence-based decision-making, to improve customer-focused product customization,to generate competitive advantage, to improve decision-making under uncertain conditions, and topromote continuous quality improvement. The curriculum is being updated to meet the demandsof the labor market and technological advances. The methodology includes identifying educationalneeds, setting clear objectives, designing and implementing the curriculum, and continuouslyevaluating its impact for improvement. Research findings have indicated a substantial enhancementin students' capacity
rights; ES&C: economic, social, and cultural rights; RD&I: research, development,and implementation of projects and technologies; and HR: human rights.”III. History of Human Rights and Engineering at the National AcademiesNational Academy of EngineeringWhile direct engagement with human rights is a new focus for the NAE, the organization has a longhistory of addressing engineering’s societal impacts. In the 1980s and early 1990s, the NAE publishedreports such as Hazards: Technology and Fairness (1986) [20], Engineering and the Advancement ofHuman Welfare (1989) [21], and Engineering as a Social Enterprise (1991) [22]. These reports laid thegroundwork for exploring the broader ethical and social dimensions of engineering.In 2003, a
college to implement the reform, and the dramatic improvement in completing college-level math for community-college students. She consults with states and institutions to improve student success in college, particularly with Complete College America (CCA). At University of Colorado Boulder, Heidi is a Senior Research Associate in Ethnography & Evaluation Research, a center focused on STEM education. She recently was the project lead in transforming teaching evaluation practices in the College of Arts & Sciences and supports the College of Engineering and Applied Sciences and the Graduate School with special projects. A fourth-generation Coloradoan and educator, she lives in Denver with her husband, two college
the following research question: What arethe similarities and differences in ethical concerns and mitigation strategies discussed in the policydocuments across these five countries?The justification for choosing the five countries is as follows: 1) These five countries/regions (namely:USA, UK, China, EU and India) provide a large portion of the world’s AI research, investment, and marketinfluence. For example, the US, UK, EU, and China combined contributed 101 notable Machine Learning(ML) algorithms, whereas India was the second largest contributor to Github’s AI project [19]. 2) The U.S.and China are leading in the development and application of commercial AI, and control the biggest AIdriven economies [20]. 3) The EU and UK are at the
construction and fac¸ade projects, including high-rise and industrial developments across West Africa, having held key roles in the field. His research interests include the integration of digital tools in construction education, resilient building design, and asset management in civil infrastructure. He is passionate about bridging academic knowledge with real-world application and is committed to developing innovative, cost-effective, and sustainable construction solutions.Samuel Sola Akosile, Morgan State University Samuel Akosile is a Ph.D. student in Sustainable Infrastructure and Resilience Engineering at Morgan State University, within the Department of Civil Engineering. He currently works as a Research Assistant
Paper ID #47948Evaluation of a 9th-Grade Integrated STEM Curriculum Connecting Biology,Data Analysis with Excel, and Problem-Solving (Evaluation)Ms. Jiwon Kim, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE) Jiwon Kim is a second-year Ph.D. student at the School of Engineering Education, Purdue University. She earned her M.Sc. in Human-Computer Interaction and B.Sc. in Earth Science Education, both at Seoul National University. Her current research interests are K-12 engineering and STEM education (curriculum development and evaluation). Currently participating in the IQPARC project with Dr. Muhsin Menekse, she researches how
computational thinking, engineering design, technology, and systems thinkingthrough hands-on, collaborative, student-driven projects. Camp sessions are co-facilitated by localK-12 teachers and undergraduate student mentors from the University of Florida. The GGEEprogram prioritized the hiring of undergraduate student mentors who were from the school districtshosting the camps.In this exploratory mixed methods study, undergraduate student mentor perceptions of near-peermentorship are used to assess the GGEE program’s impact on participant STEM identity andexplore the personal benefits of participation. This paper reports on the following researchquestions: 1) How does serving as near-peer mentors to K-12 student mentees in an educationalSTEM summer
- Lincoln Dr. Perry is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Education in the Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln. His work contains a unique blend of engineering education and civil engineering projects. Dr. Perry’s current work centers workplace readiness, broadening participation, and construction safety education. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Challenges in Engineering Statics: Students' Perceptions of Their DifficultiesAbstractEngineering statics is a foundational course for engineering students, serving as a prerequisite foradvanced courses such as mechanics of materials and playing a critical role in
faculty member using a rubric to scorepitch performance, communication skills, and value creation. Three faculty teaching differentsections of seminar worked collaboratively across disciplines to measure n=19 engineeringstudents, n=14 computer science students, and n=8 communication students. An additional 68students in a different seminar class served as a control group. Additionally, after the completionof the project, the three faculty evaluated the student pitches using a pitch rubric that wasdesigned to assess technical content, communication skills, and articulation of theentrepreneurial mindset, focused on “Creating Value. To identify the interrater reliability of thefaculty feedback, each of the faculty-evaluations were compared to one
my research. My experiencesbring a particular lens to this work. Others who had similar research goals may have broughtdifferent perspectives to the work or constructed different meaning from the study. I use thefirst-person in this paper to acknowledge that this research project is tightly related to who I am asa researcher.My theoretical perspective is interpretivism. I believe that interpretations are “contextuallydependent on the history and culture that influences how each individual interprets and makesmeaning of their world” [15, p. 1173]. Therefore, I recognize that each individual whoparticipates in an interaction or observes an action or event may come to their own interpretationand understanding.3 Literature ReviewTechnical
Paper ID #46660Using ChatGPT to Improve Learning in Applied Statics for ConstructionEngineering StudentsProf. Hector Buyones-Gonzalez, Universidad Andres Bello, Santiago, Chile Hector Buyones Gonzalez is a professor in the School of Engineering’s Construction Engineering program at Universidad Andres Bello and Universidad Autonoma de Chile in Santiago, Chile. He earned his degree in Civil Engineering and Civil Construction, as well as a Master’s degree in Construction Management. With extensive experience coordinating and executing construction projects across diverse sectors—including the oil industry (refineries
-engineeringstudents and sought to teach skills typically focused upon in general education such as writing,public speaking, and teamwork in an engineering setting. They had students write responses toselected publications, present a report on the life of an engineering innovator, and complete ahands-on project to build and design robots. At both institutions, these approaches found successbecause of their novel approach to bringing engineering into general education to bothdemonstrate the usefulness of the skills taught in the general education curriculum to theengineering career and deliver information about engineering to a mixed student audience.The typical approach to general education silos disciplines and makes integration of materialacross disciplines
, team-oriented environments complements their technical expertise. Currently, he is pursuing a PhD in Engineering Education at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, where they serve as a Graduate Research Assistant. Additionally, he contribute as a visiting professor at Federal Institute of Science and Technology of Minas Gerais (IFMG-Bambu´ı) in Brazil. His research is centered on innovative methodologies for Engineering Education, with a particular focus on the VADERs project: Virtual/Augmented-reality Discipline Exploration Rotations. This initiative seeks to enhance self-efficacy, diversity awareness and engagement in engineering within the AEC (Architecture, Engineering, and Construction) curriculum by integrating
Engineering Education at the University at Buffalo – SUNY where she leads the Diversity Assessment Research in Engineering to Catalyze the Advancement of Respect and Equity (DAREtoCARE) Lab. Her research focuses on developing cultures of care and well-being in engineering education spaces, assessing gains in institutional efforts to advance equity and inclusion, and using data science for training socially responsible engineers.Nichole Ramirez, University of Texas at El Paso Dr. Nichole Ramirez is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Education and Leadership at the University of Texas at El Paso. Previously, she served as the assistant director of Vertically Integrated Projects at Purdue University. Her
: Engineering Design: Problem Framing, Project Management, Ideation, Engineering Prototyping, Decision Making, Design Methods, Engineering Graphics, Design Practices Communication Material Processing: Manufacturing, Management & Precision, Fabrication, Classification, Casting, Molding & Forming, Separating & Machining, Joining, Conditioning & Finishing, Safety Quantitative Analysis: Computational Thinking, Data Collection, Analysis & Communication, System Analytics, Modeling & Simulation Professionalism: Ethics, Workplace Behavior & Operations, Intellectual Property, Technological Impacts, Role
, a medium-sized private university in the northeast, all first-semesterengineering students (and students who intend to transfer into engineering) take one of 19themed sections of the introductory “Applications in Engineering” course. Every sectionemphasizes project work, engineering ethics, and the engineering design process. The sectionincluded in this study was titled “Equitable and Inclusive Civil Infrastructure.” About a third ofthe 29 enrolled students stated they chose to enroll in this section because of the focus. At thebeginning of the semester, 11 students were considering a major in civil and environmentalengineering. Twelve of the 29 students (41%) were women, lower than the engineering freshmanclass average of 51%.The 3-credit
real” in practical situations such ascommunicating with one’s team, managing stakeholder relationships, and navigating projects. Senge [3] offers insight into developing one’s personal mastery through committing toface one’s current reality; this includes creating realistic appraisals of an individual’s currentsituation and leaning into creative tension which is the balance between one’s current reality andtheir vision for the future. This is achieved by reflecting on one’s own goals and aspirations andregarding oneself as an active participant in creating their reality. Personal mastery has limited representation in engineering education literature. A briefreview of available literature demonstrated it has been discussed in work
practice. Recently, she has taken on new NSF projects to broaden participation in quantum engineering (IUSE Level 3), research abroad (IRES Track 1), and use-inspired research (Convergence Accelerator Track I). Having grown up in Australia, Canada, Korea, and Germany, she speaks three languages. Leveraging her international connections, she has served in leadership positions in the Korean-American Scientists and Engineers Association (KSEA, Vice President), Korean Society for Engineering Education (KSEE, International Relations Board Member), and the International Federation of Engineering Education Societies (IFEES, Executive Committee Member).Philip Feng, University of Florida ©American
classroom learning as they are incentivized tofind the answer using materials and the structured support provided by technology. Thus, havinga techhat is built off of resources meant to push students to learn actively is beneficial for a classthat requires constant engineering troubleshooting to succeed. In response to these challenges, this study explores the integration of artificialintelligence (AI) as an innovative tool to support laboratory-based mechanical engineeringeducation. Specifically, we developed an AI chatbot designed to provide immediate, on-demandassistance in engineering experimentation classes. These courses instruct students on usingengineering concepts in laboratory experimentation through project experimentation
, accountability, and assurance; and 5) Finally, the ‘Experiential’module integrates these concepts through hands-on projects. This modular approach ensuresaccessibility to students from diverse backgrounds, allowing seamless integration into one ormultiple courses.2.1 ObjectivesThe primary goal of the interactive laboratories is to provide hands-on experience in key areas ofmachine learning and cybersecurity while introducing students to emerging researchdirections.The core objectives of these experiment-based labs are as follows: 1. Engage students in hands-on experiments to foster interest and active participation in the design, analysis, and research of AI and cybersecurity applications. 2. Develop, implement, and assess strategies for AI