Learning through DesignFindings from initial field studies of this work have focused on better understanding informalexperiences related to design [30, 31, 32]. With regard to where engineering design learningoccurs, the literature points to various educational contexts that effectively deliver engineeringdesign education. The most common settings include capstone design courses, first-yearengineering courses, and other non-traditional classroom experiences (e.g. Virtual laboratories).Strategies that involve authentic and longer-term engineering design experiences tend to be themost impactful in terms of student outcomes and perceptions, however those experiences are notalways implementable at larger scale. More traditional educational approaches
7insurance as impediments to joining the ETIC.The School has been addressing this challenge by establishing a support system for allapplicants to the ETIC. For instance, and in order to attract and support industrypartners that fit the right profile, NYIT has submitted an application to StartUpNY.10 This New York State program targets businesses whose mission align well withthe host university’s research agenda. Through the program, New York offers new andexpanding businesses the opportunity to operate tax-free for 10 years on eligibleuniversity or college campuses throughout the State. Participants partnering withuniversities also gain access to advanced research laboratories, development resourcesand faculty experts in key fields.This support
the textbook or guide, design and layout shouldbe developmentally appropriate and students did not like reliance on the textbook, so programdevelopers should deliver content in an innovative manner. Students prefer adequate class timefor project work, and might attend meetings before or after school to have more access to freetime. Perhaps students could be allowed an EPICS study hall or laboratory option in theirschedule. Students want engagement with other communities doing similar projects. Theywanted “more communication between groups working on similar projects.” They also wantedto interact with EPICS alumni who are “now living an engineering lifestyle.” We have not yetresponded to either of these suggestions with program level changes
Energy (ISE). In 2008, she received the inaugural Bullitt Environmental Fellowship for leadership in the environmental field. She was awarded the I.W. Smith Award for Outstanding achievement in creative mechanical engineering within 10 years of graduation (2011) and the Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation Early Researcher Award (2012). She is the Director of the Thermofluids for Energy and Advanced Materials (TEAM) Laboratory working in fuel cells, electrolyzers, and subsurface geology. In 2014 she became a Fellow of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering and was most recently awarded an Alexander von Humboldt Fellowship for Experienced Researchers. c American Society for
Paper ID #14873Innovative Design within the Context of Virtual Internships: How Can It BeDefined and How is It Related to the Student Design Process?Matthew Raymond Markovetz, University of Pittsburgh Matthew Markovetz is Ph.D. Candidate in Chemical Engineering at the University of Pittsburgh. His inter- est in both engineering education and technical engineering research developed while studying Chemical and Biological Engineering at the University of Colorado at Boulder. Matthew’s research in education focuses on methods that increase innovation in product design, and his laboratory research seeks to un- derstand and
is the Thomas Walter Distinguished professor of Mechanical Engineering at Auburn Uni- versity. He is the co-founder and director of the NSF-funded Laboratory for Innovative Technology and Engineering Education (LITEE). LITEE has been recently recognized by the National Academy of Engi- neering as one of the model programs in the country that has successfully infused real world experiences into engineering undergraduate education. He is also the founder and director of the Auburn Engineering Technical Assistance Program (AETAP). Prior to coming to Auburn in 1984, Dr. Raju held faculty posi- tions in several universities in India and visiting positions at the Catholic University of America, Purdue University, and
the firstweek, Nelson participated in numerous activities and casually interacted with the students.Towards the end of the week she approached each student individually and asked them toparticipate in an interview discussing their perceptions of being female engineers. All interviews were conducted face-to-face at the REU’s host university in a conferenceroom adjacent to the research laboratory. Nelson, who holds a Bachelor’s and Master’s degree inenvironmental engineering and a Ph.D. in curriculum and instruction: engineering education,conducted all interviews. She provided a unique background that aligned with the students,including working towards an engineering degree and participating in summer undergraduateresearch programs
Paper ID #14690Using Capstone to Drive Continuous Improvement in the CurriculumDr. Mark W. Steiner, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Mark Steiner is Professor in the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering (MAE) in the College of Engineering and Computer Science (CECS) at the University of Central Florida (UCF). He currently serves as Director of Engineering Design in the MAE Department. Mark previously served as Director of the O.T. Swanson Multidisciplinary Design Laboratory in the School of Engineering at Rens- selaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI) and Professor of Practice in the Mechanical, Aerospace and
engineering” or “disciplinary engineering” courses.2Chen (2014) also analyzed course descriptions of 2,222 non-repeated first-year engineeringcourses to identify topical key words using a revised First-Year Engineering CourseClassification Scheme2,3. On average, first-year engineering courses listed 5-6 different topics,with 8% listing only one topic and less than 1% listing twenty or more topics. The mostfrequently listed topics (not in rank order) included engineering profession, disciplines ofengineering, engineering careers, and roles and responsibilities of engineers, problem solvingskills, laboratory experiments, software tools, programming skills, Computer Aided Design(CAD), graphics, circuits, problem solving skills, basic design concepts
. Hole. “Using a Marketplace to Form Multidisciplinary Systems Engineering Capstone Project Teams.” Proc. of the ASEE Annual Conference, June 2014.5. K. Shimazu, and Y. Ohkami. “Systems engineering education for inexperienced students by providing hand-on practices.” IEEE Systems Conference (SysCon), 2011, pp. 367- 370.6. W. Bauer, W. Biedermann, B. Helms and M. Maurer, “A student laboratory for Systems Engineering: Teaching Systems Engineering to students without previous SE-knowledeg based on an industry-oriented example,” IEEE Systems Conference (SysCon), 2012, pp. 1-6.7. J. Valasek, and K. Shryock, “Enhancing Systems Engineering Content in Aerospace Courses: Capstone Design and Senior Technical Electives
solution for managing wiring harnesses of laboratory rodents in large-scale obstacle courses. Address: Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Utah, 1495 East 100 South, 1550 MEK, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 Phone: 801-808-3571 Email: nicolas.n.brown@gmail.comMs. Joy Velarde, University of Utah Joy Velarde is an Academic Advisor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Utah. She has a Bachelor of Science degree in Psychology from Brigham Young University and a Master of Arts degree in Higher Education Administration from Boston College.Dr. Debra J. Mascaro, University of Utah Debra J. Mascaro is the Director of Undergraduate Studies in Mechanical Engineering at the University of Utah
design project is the Rodent Tracker; a mechatronics solution for managing wiring harnesses of laboratory rodents in large-scale obstacle courses. Address: Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Utah, 1495 East 100 South, 1550 MEK, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 Phone: 801-808-3571 Email: nicolas.n.brown@gmail.comMs. Joy Velarde, University of Utah Joy Velarde is an Academic Advisor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Utah. She has a Bachelor of Science degree in Psychology from Brigham Young University and a Master of Arts degree in Higher Education Administration from Boston College.Dr. Debra J Mascaro, University of Utah Debra J. Mascaro is the Director of Undergraduate Studies
., et al., The Wave Concepts Inventory – An Assessment Tool for Courses in Electromagnetic Engineering, in Frontiers in Education1998: Tempe, Arizona.6. Acuna, A. and R. Sosa, 2010. The Complementary Role of Representations in Design Creativity: Sketches and Models. Proc. Int. Conf. Design and Creativity. Japan.7. Moore, T.J., et al., Modeling in engineering: the role of represntational fluency in students' conceptual understanding. Journal of Engineering Education, 2013. 102(1): p. 141-178.8. R. A. Cheville, A. McGovern, and K. Bull, The Light Applications in Science and Engineering Research Collaborative Undergraduate Laboratory for Teaching (LASER CULT)-Relevant Experiential Learning in Photonics
(bottom-up) dynamical models that track the behavior of individualatoms and molecules, and (top-down) continuum models like those of Navier-Stokes andCauchy that are applicable at the scale of millimeters and above. Can the continuum accountof the vibration behavior of an elastic body (i.e. a string or membrane in this paper) bereduced to the theory of its atomic constituents in the sense that we can derive the macroscalebehavior from the microscale (particle) theory?The upscaling of the model descriptions from atomic to laboratory scales usually takes placeby reduction. The individual description of elastically coupled particles reduces to continuummechanics by making use of appropriate mathematical limits, which seems to be justified
: DataExplorer and Assessment Resources for Faculty.References1 Hestenes, David, and Halloun, Ibrahim. "Interpreting the force concept inventory." The Physics Teacher 33.8, 1995, pp 502-506.a2 Thornton, Ronald K., and Sokoloff, David R. "Assessing student learning of Newton’s laws: The force and motion conceptual evaluation and the evaluation of active learning laboratory and lecture curricula." American Journal of Physics 66.4, 1998, pp 338-352.3 Ding, Lin, et al. "Evaluating an electricity and magnetism assessment tool: Brief electricity and magnetism assessment." Physical review special Topics-Physics education research 2.1, 2006.4 Keininger, Thomas G., “Table structure recognition based on robust block
degree in engineering,science or medicine, which is designed to take 10 semesters. Enrolled graduate students areexpected to first obtain a Certificate in BME through one or two semesters of full time study (12units), a Diploma is issued after two to four semesters (24 units total), and finally a Master’sdegree after four to six semesters (48 units total). Students may leave the program at any ofthese stages with what is anticipated to be a useful credential for work in the emergingbiomedical industry. Typical courses are 2 or 3 units, where 1 unit represents at least 15 hours ofcontact time, and up to 25 hours if the course includes a laboratory or design component. TheMaster’s degree does not require a thesis, but it does require a 6 unit
that online quiz scoresshowed higher correlation with final examination marks than laboratory or assignment marks.Grimstad and Grabe (2004)19 found that students who completed voluntary quizzessignificantly improved their exam performances. However, their conclusions were explainedby good students being both motivated to take voluntary quizzes and likely to do well onexams. Brothen and Wambach (2001)8 cautioned that mandatory quizzes only improve examperformance if students employ an efficient strategy of using the quizzes to test their ownknowledge of the material, rather than attempting to use the quiz to learn the material.Furthermore, a set of precautions were suggested by Angus and Watson (2009)20 forsuccessful administration of periodic
(accessed April 5, 2016).11. McGee, S.; Davis, V. A.: Auburn Abalone Msp. Youtube, 2013.12. TAPPI Nanocellulose Video - Rethink Paper. Youtube, 2011.13. In the News - USDA Forest Products Laboratory Nanocellulose Facility Grand Opening. http://umaine.edu/pdc/in-the-news/fpl-nanocellulose-facility-grand-opening/ (accessed June 15, 2014.
professional conferences3,4,5,10,11,14. This isalso evidenced by a number of Aerospace Engineering majors getting employment for theindustry careers that have traditionally required Computer Science or Electrical & ElectronicsEngineering graduates such as in Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Unmanned Systems Division ofNorthrop Grumman Corporation, etc.Increased emphasis is placed on interdisciplinary learning, and students are highly encouraged tolearn other disciplines as the companies involved in UAV technologies are increasingly lookingfor graduates with knowledge and skills in multiple disciplines.C. Improved Written and Oral Communication SkillsThese projects have been helpful in improving the students’ written and oral communicationskills. As the
there must be a forward transmitted and backward reflected wave at adiscontinuity in the characteristic impedance in order to conserve energy. We exploit thisconsequence to calculate the attributes of the transmission line. This project can be conductedunder the pretext of a power company or communications company who want to locate faults intheir transmission lines.CharacteristicsStudents are asked to find: 1. velocity of propagation in the transmission line, 2. length of the transmission line, 3. attenuation coefficient of the transmission line, 4. impedance of an unknown termination.Initial ConditionsThis project is best presented a laboratory project. In other words, the only equipment need is anoscilloscope, function generator
as they workedon more authentic engineering challenges over time. By ‘authentic,’ we mean problems with noclear correct single solution, which are co-determined by participants as they negotiate with eachother and relevant stakeholders, such their clients. 11,12 By conducting the study in a naturalisticsetting, we hoped to identify contextualized and diverse information gathering processes asopposed to the limited gathering processes available in clinical laboratory settings. MethodsThis study is a secondary analysis of data collected from a multiple case study of seven groups ofadolescents (25 people total) as they selected problems in their communities and developedsolutions over the course of
teaching programming using SLA was helpful to their learning. Students whohave a second language learning experience especially confirmed this during the interview.Students indicated more engagement with the online interactive video, compared to the topicsthat were presented in a traditional non-interactive format. The captions in the videos helpstudents understand the specific terms. Music does not play an important role in the videodesign. They pointed out that the tiered examples in the videos and tiered quiz questions easedtheir anxiousness and helped their comprehension of the materials. Students expressed a desire toflip all topics to SLA-aBLe format. Students also commented on the laboratory sessions,indicating that the “think, pair, share
beyond baseline course requirements. Additionally, the project instilled anew level of confidence in my ability to work independently, communicate with a projectmanager, and ultimately formulate an industry relevant process while gaining significantengineering knowledge and skills. This confidence and its corresponding skills helped me to landa product design engineering internship with a medical device company, developing tissuesimulating, multimodality phantoms for the medical imaging industry.Professor’s ReflectionThis study is a good example for a student driven project. It can also be seen as a project with afacilitation component.The student was presented laboratory capabilities, a set of Geomagic Tutorials andsupplementing data after a
instructors on what areas to focus on when planning forfuture offerings of the course.References[1] Guskey, T. R. (2005). Formative Classroom Assessment and Benjamin S. Bloom: Theory, Research and Implications. In the Annual Meeting of American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.[2] Bloom, B. S., Hastings, J. T., and Madaus, G. F. (1973). Learning for Mastery. National Laboratory for Higher Education.[3] Bloom, B. S., and Carroll, J. B. (1971). Mastery learning: Theory and Practice. Ed. James H. Block. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.[4] Keller, F. S., Sherman, J. G., and Bori, C. M. (1974). PSI, the Keller Plan Handbook: Essays on a Personalized System of Instruction. Menlo Park, Calif.: WA Benjamin.[5] Onipede, O
rolemodels (Hughes, 2015; Bieri Buschor et al., 2014; Demetry & Sontgerath, 2013; Fadigan &Hammerich, 2004).Middle School Outreach as a Recruitment Strategy: Implications for Program EvaluationUniversities are in a good position to offer high quality outreach programming because of theirability to connect girls with a wide range of positive role models in STEM disciplines and tooffer hands-on experiences in science and engineering laboratories. Our examination of datacollected by the Engineering Education Service Center (EESC) suggests that 147 universitiesacross the United States are offering more than double the number of STEM enrichmentprograms at the high school level than at the middle school level (EESC, 2017). Deliveringbudget-neutral
.9. Bedard Jr., A.J. (1999). “Inhancing Student Creativity and Respect for the Linkages between Analysis and Design in a First Year Engineering Course.” Proceedings of the 1999 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, pp. 2893-2908, Charlotte, NC.10. Pierson, H.M. and Suchora, D.H. (2002). “The Rube Goldberg Three-minute Timer: A Design Based Learning Tool for Engineering Freshman.” Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, pp. 1-9.11. Graff, R.W., Leiffer, P.R., Green, M.G., and Koblich, J.K. (2011). “Thirty Years of Rube Goldberg Projects: A Student-driven Learning Laboratory for Innovation.” Proceedings of the 2011 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, AC 2011-792
, IEEE Computer Society, and the Web3D Consortium. He is a co-author of the international standard (ISO) Extensible 3D (X3D), elected Director and President of the Web3D Consor- tium, and Chair of the Web3D User Interface Working Group.Prof. R. Michael Buehrer, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Dr. R. Michael Buehrer joined Virginia Tech from Bell Labs as an Assistant Professor with the Bradley Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering in 2001. He is currently a Professor of Electrical Engineering and is the director of Wireless @ Virginia Tech, a comprehensive research group focusing on wireless communications. During 2009 Dr. Buehrer was a visiting researcher at the Laboratory for
),” EuropeanJournal of Engineering Education, 38(4), 281-299.[7] Pierce, C.E., and Berge, N.D. (2014), “Development of an Integrated Curriculum forEducating Engineers about Nanotechnology: End-of-Life Management of Nanomaterial-Containing Wastes,” Proc. 121st ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, IN, 8 p.[8] Matta, F., and Pierce, C.E. (2014-2015), “Decision Worksheet: Portland Cement Mortar forNuclear Waste Storage.” ECIV 303L Civil Engineering Materials Laboratory [class handout].University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC.
extending acrossall four years of the undergraduate coursework including: Introduction to Civil Engineering (CE103) Surveying (CE 205), Geomatics (CE 208), Surveying Lab (CE 235/239), HighwayEngineering (CE 302), Geotechnical Engineering Lab (CE 402), Introduction to GeotechnicalEngineering (CE 409), and Capstone Design (CE 432). Teamwork assignments in these coursesinclude: laboratory teams, problems solving sessions, homework assignments, classpresentations, exam preparation exercises proposal preparation, design projects, and designproject presentations. Course-based Embedded Indicator results, Department Senior Exit Surveydata, and student perception data of teamwork effectiveness will be evaluated and compared.Results will be useful in
students in their third (i.e., junior) year. The project was sponsored by an officefurniture company looking to bring a new line of “impromptu” seating options to market.Students worked individually on their designs and met informally with the instructor (Gary)during a 6-hour studio session each week. Students could also use a fabrication laboratory tobuild prototypes. Most design reviews occurred in the student workspace – a busy classroomspace with two back-to-back rows of tables with multiple computer displays and workspace foreach student (often cluttered with sketches, foam models, and other objects). There were fivedesign reviews: (1) a one-on-one review at the front of the room where students laid outpreliminary concept sketches to discuss