created over time, toshow the changes and advancement of their writing skills. These two types of portfolios areconsidered to be the basis of the portfolios used in engineering discipline.Besides these two commonly used portfolio models, there are several other types of portfoliomodels being suggested and used in the practice. Cress and McCullouogh-Cress1 designed astudent portfolio as a collection of student goals for learning, works in progress, peer andinstructor feedback, and reflections on the work and processes. Gottlieb2 pointed out thatportfolio designs, contents, and purposes could take on many forms, all of which areeducationally defensible. In order to clarify the variety of portfolios, he proposed adevelopmental scheme, which includes
program was conducted with a larger group of students inthe summer of 2022. Thus far, our results indicate that this program will be beneficial to studentswell after regular programming resumes at full capacity. GREaT GradS was designed to servegroups of graduate students who are typically marginalized within science with an eye towardretention through support and mentorship. The overall goals were to provide (1) ResourceRecognition by introducing students to the various academic and personal resources available oncampus, (2) Personal Preparation through programming on subjects such as personal finance andmental health, (3) Career Preparation through writing workshops and curriculum vitae editing,and (4) Network Building by connecting students
model, combined withscholarship support, has been shown to have the potential to overcome the challenges of limitedconnection to peers and institutions that transfer students often encounter [2].The APEX program also includes a focus on providing formal and informal opportunities fortransfer students to engage with faculty and other students. Mentoring is a proven practice forsupporting low-income STEM students’ retention and has especially been shown to benefitcommunity college transfer students [3]. Comprehensive mentoring has been shown to helpstudents navigate the curriculum, the co-curriculum, and the “hidden curriculum” – the“unwritten, often unspoken norms, values, expectations, behaviors, codes of conduct” that are“not transparent or
maximum of 8 semesters.Program HighlightsThe DuSTEM program is designed to improved retention of students in STEM. Support isbroken into three areas: financial, academic, and community [1]. These ideas are predicated onthe nine key principles advanced by the non-profit “Building Engineering and Science Talent”which identifies nine qualities of programs that are successful in nurturing well-qualified STEMgraduates [2]. These principles are • Institutional leadership • Personal attention • Bridging to the next level • Targeted recruitment • Peer support • Financial assistance • Engaged faculty • Enriched research opportunities • Continuous evaluationThe DuSTEM program is designed support
decades, one of the top priorities forAmerica’s higher education leaders is to get more students into college. The second priority is tograduate students that are competent in their field of study. In a recent national study, only twoof five minority students who enroll in engineering programs graduate with a baccalaureatedegree in engineering, as compared to two of three non-minority students. Another nationalstudy found that 54 percent of students entering four-year colleges in 1997 had a degree six yearslater, with even a lower percentage for Hispanics and Blacks. The barriers to minority studentretention continue to be: the cost of education, isolating campus environments, a lack of peer andfaculty engagement, and inadequate math and science
] The ways in which the genders vary in the respectivedisciplines is of particular interest, as it may give us a clue as to why so few women enter certaindisciplines and are attracted to others disproportionately [1,10]. Further, in at least one study,gender differences in engineering GPA’s (women’s being higher) disappeared when major wascontrolled [7]. In other words, sometimes observed gender differences are artifacts or inflatedbecause of the differential distribution of the genders across engineering disciplines. Weenvisioned writing a paper entitled, “It’s the Major, Stupid!” But it isn’t that simple, as our datashow. Gender matters, and major matters, and year in the program matters, and they eveninteract in instructive ways.The question
design courses and are evaluated as graduate attributeoutcomes integral to the Canadian Engineering Accreditation Board (CEAB) evaluationprocesses. Continual course improvement processes require reflection on the success oflearning activities, the tools used for teaching, and alignment of learning outcomes,activities, and assessment. Peer evaluation and feedback tools can encourage studentlearning and leadership development. The method of data collection, the type of feedbackand the contextual validity of the feedback may impact students’ development of useful teambehaviours and personal strategies for working in team environments. Mixed methodsuccessive case study analysis provides insights enabling targeted improvements to learningactivities
limited to a few hundred pages in length for economic reasons • the writing level is focused on readers with specific knowledge and interests • books are printed in editions that are released in static forms that don’t change • textbooks are relatively expensive and require marketing and distribution • there is a delay of months or years to release a new editionBy necessity a publisher must develop a book that addresses an identifiable need while control-ling costs. In pragmatic terms a book must not try to be all things to all readers.2.1 PastFrom my own experiences textbooks are very important. In my days as a student I could extractmost of the required information from the textbook, and the course notes. In the
.Bruner’s writings on constructivism7,8 provide the practical framework for using real-worldprojects to improve learning and develop useful professional skills: (a) students have apredisposition toward learning; (b) instruction should be designed to fill in the gaps; and (c) Page 9.279.1instruction should to take advantage of students’ experiences and previous knowledge. Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering EducationJonassen, Peck, and Wilson9, described five attributes necessary to create the
the same end, the legal education profession utilizes actual recorded courtcases documenting the development and applications of principles and concepts to facts. The businessand management higher education profession has followed the law schools in utilizing cases forexperiential purposes for the students in applying the various concepts. One disadvantage thatbusiness and education has is no ready accessible cases, i.e., someone must write the cases.The result is that there are desirable aspects of business and management cases that are not available.One is a lesser emphasis in business and management cases reinforcement of principles: Cases should be used with the clear consciousness that the purpose of business education is not
work on their tasks in an asynchronous mode and have asuccessful interaction with their peers. Our main goal in structuring this course around FirstClass™ is to create a virtual learning community that will provide the students with the bestenvironment to nurture their intellectual curiosity. This paper will also focus on tools used toassess the effect of the use the Intranets in the course as well as the student's perceptions fn using Page 5.694.1technology for this kind of courses.COOPERATIVE LEARNINGThere is a strong interest in today’s Higher Education, especially in Engineering and EngineeringTechnology, in promoting cooperative
. Page 2.138.7Figure A.2. Refrigeration cycle layout with sensor locations identified. Page 2.138.8 Appendix B. Self and peer review form KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY-SALINA MET 462 & 464 SENIOR DESIGN PROJECT I & II Self and peer review formNAME:STUDENT BEING EVALUATED:Complete the following information to critique your own or another individual’s performance.Be as truthful as possible and write out any specific strengths and/or weaknesses in the spaceprovided. You may leave some categories blank if you feel you do not have sufficientinformation.For each of the
processing waste treatment x Dairy waste management and treatment x Swine waste management and treatment Page 2.304.6 x Poultry waste management and treatment x Aquaculture waste treatment x On-site waste treatment for small communitiesCOURSE EVALUATIONEvaluation of the course is planned at several stages during its development and from a numberof sources. These sources include peer review, industry review, student review and results of aproposed workshop on the course. In March 1997 (at the time of writing this paper), a detailedoutline of the course content was sent for peer review to various
weekly progress reports and gather input from theircustomers. Their work culminates in a prototype demonstration and final report to documenttheir work for teams who will carry it forward in future terms.Course StructureThe ENGR 151 course is taught on an 11 week quarter system. It begins with a three weekintroduction to computer programming and microcontrollers. Class time is dominated by a seriesof lab activities. Each lab starts with one to three microcontroller circuit tutorials that integratenew programming and electronics concepts before students complete a mini-design challenge tointegrate new learning into a small design project implemented on their breadboard. This work iscomplemented by brief lectures and peer instruction using
. Table 1. Sample of initial questionnaire translated in English1) I know how to turn on / shut down a computer2) I know the basic parts of a computer (screen, mouse, keyboard, tower)3) Page 22.1521.34) I know how to browse on the InternetWhich key do I have to use to make my keyboard write in capitals? Chose the correct answer Α. Β. Γ.Match the text with the icon Close window Minimize window Maximize windowThere is a computer at homeThere is Internet connection at homeTable 2. Sample of the questionnaire given to
hourLearning Outcome AssessmentThe assessment methods for this comprehensive bridge project encompasses two primaryassessment methods: performance-based assessment and technical writing. The assessmentframework is structured to ensure a multifaceted analysis of each team's output, focusing on bothquantitative and qualitative metrics.The performance of the student-designed bridges is appraised according to two main criteria:data comparison, which accounts for 70% of the overall assessment, and peer reviews, whichcontribute the remaining 30%. The quantitative assessment hinges on the comparison of themaximum force sustained by structural members in both the original and the redesigned bridges.This comparison is determined by Equation (1), which
4 appointment with a Freshman Engineering advisor to schedule their classes for the Spring semester.Spring Semester Topics Syllabus and Activities As always it is important students understand the course syllabus. Students are also presented the list of activities beyond normal class work and projects they are required to complete during the semester. These include activities associated with professional development, transition to their major, and peer mentoring. Professional Development One of the most well received parts of the Spring semester is the professional development activities element. Students participate in a series of in class workshops including resume writing
leadership, what works, and new approaches to explore through constructivecriticism from the learning communities that includes faculty, students (peer groups), and thecommunity they serve. Therefore for this article, learning communities will be defined “asgroups of people engaged in intellectual interaction for the purpose of learning” (Cross3, 1998). 3Service learning at Jackson State UniversityThe mission of the Department of Technology is to provide a nationally accredited program,which serves the technical, managerial, and communication needs of persons desiring to enter oradvance professionally in an industrial technology related career
interest, whileexercising creativity and communication skills.The creative fiction assignment was conceived upon realizing that generating ethical dilemmaswith “grey areas” and no obvious “right answer” required a nuanced level of ethicalunderstanding. At that point, instructors turned the tables on the students and provided historicalcase studies for reflection during class sessions, but asked the students, in small groups, to createtheir own fictional “case studies” as a culminating assignment. Students were initiallyencouraged to write a 1500 word creative short story, but other genres were approved. Theassignment has been implemented with 95 students over two years.MethodsInstitution and Ethics CurriculumThe authors are both assistant
requirements? 3)understanding the engineering design process, 4) beginning to learn basic engineering computertools, 5) developing writing skills, and 6) establishing ethical engineering practices.The course begins with understanding what engineering is. There is the classical definition thatengineers use science to solve problems. Most programs have come to recognize that this is anoversimplification of the engineering discipline. The students are taught that engineers have toconsider many elements that go beyond the physical sciences and mathematics. There are theadditional, broader issues of economics, politics, environment, health, safety, quality, ethics,culture and other contemporary issues.Along with an understanding of general engineering
Figure 4. Students are allowed onereport re-write after they receive grades. The purpose of the re-write is to reinforceunderstanding of the concepts, and hone their report writing skills. Students are provided writtenfeedback on their graded labs. LAB #1 – Pre-Lab Assignment In order to prepare for the lab #1, please make sure that you learn the following concepts before the next lab: Seebeck effect, Peltier effect, and electric motors - principles of operation. Obtain your information from textbooks and other peer reviewed publications. Page 22.434.6
gained understandingof organic chemistry concepts through use of a draft writing, peer review, and revision process[22]. In the work described here, the pre-survey was used to measure prior awareness, as well asstudent attitudes before completing the writing assignment. In the writing assignment, studentswere asked to summarize the essential information and to reflect on the consequences andgovernment responses to the disasters. Specific assignment prompts are shown in Table 3.Table 2. Topics of environmental disasters for engineering and chemistry student module • Flint, MI water contamination • East Palestine, OH train derailment • Maui, HI wildfires • Texas, Florida, and Puerto Rico hurricanes • Kentucky coal
collaboration. Moreover, the project isdesigned to address the requirements for writing-intensive courses at the City University of NewYork. The project components included decision-making, literature review, data analysis, andwriting. The assessment of the project included factors such as developing a logical and consistentplan, showing the related outcomes and ability to follow the priority order, creating the wholes outof multiple parts by combining facts and theories, creativity that addresses previously less exploredoptions, and teamwork. Student course evaluations revealed that students greatly valued theexperience of a semester long feedback-based delivery of an assignment. They found the projecthighly engaging. The project had other desired
. The purpose of thiscohort-based engineering faculty professional development is to further incentivize faculty tocreate curricular change by providing the opportunity to receive funding but also generatescholarly products that will be recognized in their career advancement (or P&T). The firstsection (2.1) summarizes the Curriculum Development component of the professionaldevelopment experience. The second section (2.2) summarizes the Scholarship of Teaching andLearning (SOTL) Virtual Writing Group (VWG) component of the professional developmentexperience.2.1 Curriculum Development For the curriculum development, faculty participants completed training on how bio-inspired design and STEAM (science, technology, engineering, arts
Paper ID #26197The Impact of Socio-cultural Factors in Qatar on Females in EngineeringMiss Maha Sultan Alsheeb, Texas A&M University at Qatar My name Maha Al-Sheeb. I am a joiner chemical engineer student Class of 2020. I have one brother and one sister. I joined the Academic bridge program in 2014. I believes in ”Difficult roads often leads to beautiful destination” Grand.Aspiration.Dr. Amy Hodges, Texas A&M University at Qatar Dr. Amy Hodges is an instructional assistant professor at Texas A&M University at Qatar, where she teaches first-year writing and technical and business writing courses. She also leads
taught to 5 different sections. Antidotal evidence suggests thatthe structure's laboratory course is one of the best teaching laboratory courses with respect tostudent learning objectives and the theory-based course, its instructional partner.Mid-course modifications have been made to help students improve their writing skills. Thesemodifications have given students more opportunity to earn course points through the writingand the opportunity to improve and earn back points. Peer reviews have helped students learnfrom each other and significantly reduce the amount of time a teaching assistant spends gradingthe TM's. The attendance policy, not initially implemented, requires that students attend allclasses and collect data themselves.A number of
research laboratories and focus on documenting learningprocesses as they unfold during daily practices in the laboratories. Specifically,the goal of our study is to observe and document how graduate students, and otherlab members, learn from one another within the cultural space of the laboratory,and what aspects of laboratory culture facilitate and what impede learning. To thatend, we use cognitive ethnography, an ethnographic approach combined withcognitive science to study cognitive processes through participant-observation oftwo engineering research laboratories. We identified the following themespertaining to learning experiences: scaffolding (structured activities orapprenticeship), peer-to-peer learning, self-directed and self-regulated
community in which they implemented a curriculum based on the skills learned in BME 290. Results. Since 2014, 110 Duke students have taken BME 290, and 22 of those students traveledinternationally, collectively teaching 275 students in Kenya, India, and Guatemala. Students in KenyaSUMMER 2020 VOLUME 8 ISSUE 2 1 ADVANCES IN ENGINEERING EDUCATION Using Human-Centered Design to Connect Engineering Concepts to Sustainable Development Goalsformed an engineering club and taught the curriculum to an additional 52 peers. Duke
for industryconsensus documents (standards), and documents published through legal review (patents), although students inadvanced writing classes are not asked to complete any scenarios using these paths. These paths will be exercised inthe future with courses that focus on this type of document. How was the info made available? Self-published 3rd Party, Editorial/Fact check only Conference paper Peer-reviewed Journal Where Where Where
class 3/26/21 Remote A4WHL Empathic Students read peer writing empathic design, enter comments Design into canvas rubric, and discuss in groups of 3. 4/7/21 Remote L6STF Static Failure Instructor briefly review class-prep video on ductile and Theory presents notes/examples Static Failure Theories for Brittle Materials 4/9/21 Remote A6FTG Fatigue Failure Used Zoom rooms for speed research, and planning for persuasive presentation in the following class period 4/26/21 In- L7FTG Fatigue Failure Instructor presented an