AC 2011-1795: UMLINT: IDENTIFYING DEFECTS IN UML DIAGRAMSRobert W. Hasker, University of Wisconsin-Platteville Rob has taught at University of Wisconsin-Platteville for fifteen years where he has been a key developer of the software engineering program since its inception. He also coordinates an international master’s program in computer science. In addition to academic experience, Rob has worked on a number of projects in industry ranging from avionics to cellular billing. He holds a Ph.D. in Computer Science from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Mike Rowe, University of Wisconsin-Platteville Mike has taught at the University of Wisconsin-Platteville for nine years and is a professor of Software
techniques used by software engineers • Software engineering techniques used by systems engineers • The intangible and malleable nature of software • The four essential properties of software • The three additional factors • Risk management of software projects • Software development processesFor purposes of exposition, we distinguish software engineering from softwareconstruction. Software engineers are concerned with analysis and design, allocationof requirements, component integration, verification and validation, re-engineeringof existing systems, and life cycle sustainment of software. Programmers, whomay also be capable software engineers, construct software (i.e. engage in detaileddesign
Goodell award for research creativity at SUNYIT and engineering professionalism by Mohawk Valley Engineering Executive Committee, and forging closer relations with the IEEE Mohawk Valley section. Dr. Qazi is a senior member of IEEE and a member of American Society of Engineering Education. Mr. Robert C. Decker is a Professor in the Center for Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics at Mohawk Valley Community College in Utica, NY. He holds a Masters of Science in Electrical Engi- neering from Syracuse University. Mr. Decker’s past and present academic activities include participation in a number of NSF-ATE projects in highly automated manufacturing technology, nanotechnology, and alternative energy
CCLI project, seeks to improve undergraduate learning by developing small-scale, portableexperiments for inclusion into a wide selection of Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE)lecture-based courses. Since these courses currently do not have labs associated with them, theseexperiments add a hands-on active learning component to the courses. The labs developed aspart of this project include ones for digital logic, circuits, signals and systems, control systems,power generation, random processes, and electromagnetics. The labs are described in this paperalong with the web support. Best practices and assessment methods are also discussed.IntroductionDistributed laboratories contain portable experiments that can be done in various locations
seek to develop new design educators and provide ongoing supportfor current faculty. Such understanding could help support existing capstone design facultymembers’ growth in expertise, create relevant professional development resources, andencourage new faculty members/university departments to implement capstone design courses. Itcan also provide course coordinators with strategies for engaging project and industry advisorsand for positioning the role of practice-oriented courses across the curriculum.However, little if any work to date explores faculty motivation with respect to design education.To address this gap, this paper analyzes secondary interviews conducted with capstone designfaculty; the interviews focus specifically on teaching
10 Maintain Access 23-Feb 11 Covering Tracks 25-Feb Exam 2-Mar Final Project 4-Mar Final Project 9-Mar Final Project 11-Mar Final Project2.3.3 Assessment ToolsThe following tools are used to assess student performance. As shown in Table 3, one in-class,individual-effort exam is given toward the end of the quarter and covers all course material; theexam accounts for 30% of the grade. Given our students typically work in teams aftergraduation, all other assessment tools require the students to
internship in aircraft manufacturing company Aernnova Aerospace, Spain, where she worked in assembly of aircraft wings. Jovanovic subsequently continued to work towards her doctorate at Purdue Univer- sity, Department of Mechanical Engineering Technology in Aug. 2006, as a Graduate Research Assistant in Product Lifecycle Management Centre of Excellence Laboratory. As a graduate student, she was in- volved in the following projects: Boeing PLM Certificate Program, Society of Manufacturing Engineers Education Foundation Project: Product Lifecycle Management Curriculum Modules, National Science Foundation project: Midwest Coalition for Comprehensive Design Education, and Department of Labor- funded project: Development of
Cullen note the need to incorporate more self-learning into thecurriculum 8. As part of an industry sponsored product lifecycle management course, Chang andMiller focus on problem solving, project management, communication, and teamwork 9. Earnestnotes that the efficacy of the educational program is dependent on curriculum development andhighlights the need to have clarity among stakeholders who include: curriculum developers,students, teachers, administrators, and industry 10. Gadalla also notes the need of curriculumdevelopers to consult industry 11. Kuo also recognizes the importance of relevance to industryand notes the need for continuous improvement in curricula 12. Again returning to the frameworkof Gannod et al., a curriculum can be
processing, control, design tools, manufacturing applications; and design and development of energy harvesting systems. Crawford is co-founder of the DTEACh program, a Design Technology program for K-12, and is active on the faculty of the UTeachEngineering program that seeks to educate teachers of high school engineering.Ms. Cheryl Farmer, UTeachEngineering Page 25.118.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012Cheryl Farmer is the founding Program Manager and Project Director of UTeachEngineering. Fundedthrough a five-year, $12.5 million Math and Science Partnership grant
undergraduatestudents. There are a number of other active learning methods that could effectively be used insystems engineering classes. Some techniques successfully used by the author are described indetail as follows. Page 25.1229.3Project Based TeachingIn the author’s experience, students have always indicated that they learnt more from doingprojects in undergraduate systems analysis and design class than anything else. Project basedlearning begins with an assignment to carry out one or more tasks that lead to the production of afinal product. The final product could be a design, a model, a device or a computer simulation.The work done on the project is
acognitive apprenticeship 17 view. Under such a model the mentor, perhaps the instructor,provides needed feedback and critiques to help the student assess their state of learning and todevelop understandings about the nature of their knowledge and skill. Hence, the portfolioshould provide a forum for student-teacher interaction. In such a forum, the interaction iscaptured and recorded too for it has educational value. We, as others, have explored the use ofportfolios in supporting our classes. Our earlier efforts 15,18,19 used a web-space secured byusername and password. Students posted their work electronically. The work posted wastypically web-based forms requiring short-answer or narrative responses to instructor-providedprompts. For each project
Session 1648 Problem-Based Learning and Interdisciplinary Instruction James C. Wood, Ph.D., Lynn G. Mack Tri-County Technical College/Piedmont Technical CollegeAbstractThis paper describes the development and implementation of a problem-based learning approachfor interdisciplinary instruction in introductory courses for engineering technology majors.Required general education courses in mathematics, physics, and communication have beenintegrated with introductory engineering technology courses. This project was undertaken toimprove the retention of students in engineering technology curricula and
of the beginninggraphics curriculum. As CAD technologies evolve they affect the Engineering Graphicscurriculum. Many instructors and institutions are introducing solid modeling within thebeginning graphics curriculum. Anyone that took an engineering graphics course beforethe middle 1980’s remembers the traditional approach to graphics. Topics covered at aminimum usually consisted of geometric construction, lettering, multiview projection,and dimensioning. Are these topics still important today? Almost anyone with experi-ence in the graphics industry and with experience teaching engineering graphics can pre-sent a logical argument for or against the topics listed above. With the increased use ofCAD in the graphics curriculum, what
andskills while they are working on a team design project. The students log on to the web-siteon a weekly basis and receive team process knowledge and feedback. Each student isgiven individual assessments to determine their preferences related to decision style,learning style, and conflict resolution style. The web-based model provides structuredteam process skills training and presents it to individuals on teams 1) when needed basedon the stage of team development and 2) customized for individuals based on individualstyle, learning style and preferred conflict resolution style. A database stores informationon individual team members and captures reported team symptoms as the team developsover time. The conceptual model and preliminary observations
the learningexperience. The next tier evaluates usability in three ways: (a) Observers are given fixed-question data sheets. (b) Observers record more qualitative observations. (c) A survey isadministered to the student users, which collects demographic information and opinions. In thefinal tier, students take pre-and post-tests to see if learning goals were achieved.Materials from this project will be packaged so that they can be examined and downloaded from theproject site, and also made available via CDROM. Page 5.629.1I. IntroductionIn 1998 NSF/DUE funded a “proof-of-concept” project for Loyola College to develop innovativematerials for
interaction between students and faculty.7 8 9 10 The literature suggests thevalue of incorporating a first-year seminar into learning communities as a way to providea needed linchpin for developing and maintaining a coherence of the experience11. TheFIPSE Learning Communities Dissemination Project has defined five vital elementswhose presence seem to be associated with learning community initiatives that “are beingpropelled forward, or whose absence makes the process much more challenging:” (1)Institutional readiness; (2) funding and other resources; (3) faculty involvement andfaculty support; (4) collaborative leadership group and (5) assessment as a strategy forprogram development. Since these elements are defined as important to instituting
frustration. I will show some examples ofhypertext projects that include true interactive exercises, and which use hypertext to guide thestudent in personal pathways through lecture-based material. Some of these examples usehypertext to invert the course, placing the overarching themes at the beginning, and allowing thestudent to wend their way down to the theoretical nitty-gritty. It is in this mode that hypertext Page 2.227.2and other interactive tools force us to reexamine the way we teach.There are also examples of software tools that require interactive participation by design, such as
introducing basic accounting concepts, so that studentswould have some appreciation of what accounting terminology and records actually mean. Then,the concept of the time value of money was introduced, and this led naturally to discounting andthe calculation of present value. Exercises for this section of the course were derived from realdata obtained from the world-wide-web to demonstrate to the students that the skills they werelearning were in use, and useful. Methods for valuing simple projects involving the purchase oflong-term assets were then explored, including a discussion of why simple-minded rules inwidespread use such as the payback period method could lead to incorrect decisions. Finally, weintroduced methods for selecting among projects
challenges they will address(Leijon, Gudmundsson, Staaf, and Christersson, 2022). Since problem-based learning has been effective in learning and improving CT skills(Ulger, 2018), it is always recommended to be utilized within the projects and assign-ments of engineering education. Based on these definitions, the challenging feature ofproblems can impact the student’s critical thinking though they are completely dif-ferent concepts. That is our main motivation to investigate this issue and recommendapproaches to distinguish these two terms for instructors and students of computer andsoftware engineering courses. In this paper, we are looking for answering the followingresearch questions (RQ): • RQ1: Do students know the difference between the
Uniminuto University employshigh relevance sustainability pedagogies such as problem-based learning, collaborative learning,and active learning in their daily teaching practices.Table 1 The high relevance sustainability pedagogies High Relevance and High Confidence Sustainability Pedagogies Pedagogical Approach Description/Example Project/problem-based Learning through actively attempting to study/address a learning (in an community/organizational problem or undertake a project deemed organization/community) necessary/useful by the class/community/organization. Integrative learning Integrating knowledge/methodologies/methods from more than one (inter-and disciplinary framework to understand/address
Paper ID #42244Exploring Civil Engineering and Construction Management Students’ Perceptionsof Equity in Developing Infrastructure ResilienceMiss Rubaya Rahat, Florida International University Rubaya Rahat grew up in Bangladesh, where she pursued her Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering at the Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology (BUET). After graduating she worked for two years in a construction management company in Dhaka, Bangladesh. She was involved in various residential and infrastructure construction projects. Rubaya now is a Ph.D. candidate at Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
(2021).Dr. Ibrahim H. Yeter, Nanyang Technological University Ibrahim H. Yeter, Ph.D., is an Assistant Professor at the National Institute of Education (NIE) at Nanyang Technological University (NTU) in Singapore. He is an affiliated faculty member of the NTU Centre for Research and Development in Learning (CRADLE) and the NTU Institute for Science and Technology for Humanity (NISTH). He serves as the Director of the World MOON Project and holds editorial roles as Associate Editor of the IEEE Transactions on Education and Editorial Board Member for the Journal of Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning. He is also the upcoming Program Chair-Elect of the PCEE Division at ASEE. His current research
project- and problem-based learning (PBL). He is a fellow of the American Society of Civil Engineers (F.ASCE), a member of the American Society for Engineering Education (M.ASEE), and a Board-Certified Environmental Engineer (BCEE) from the American Academy of Environmental Engineers and Scientists (AAEES). He is also an ABET EAC and ETAC Program Evaluation Volunteer (ABET EAC PEV) for civil engineering, environmental engineering, and environmental engineering technology programs.Dr. Youngguk Seo, Kennesaw State University Youngguk Seo is interested in the characterization of multi-phased transportation materials such as asphalt concrete, Portland cement concrete, and foundation soils. Research tools include
interested inadvancing students' invention and intellectual property (IP) engagement.On February 11, 2013, coinciding with the 165th birthday of the legendary Thomas Alva Edison,the "Science of Innovation" video series was launched as part of a collaborative project with theUSPTO and the National Science Foundation (NSF). The series expanded in 2016, adding sixadditional videos. This series showcases how innovation can transform fundamental science andengineering concepts into impactful societal and economic outcomes. Access to the entire videocollection is free, aligning seamlessly with state and national education standards. The Science ofInnovation resonates with both educators and learners alike.One of the goals of the USPTO Office of Education
of invisible Electromagnetics, which includes difficult and abstract mathematical expressions and concepts?" (2) "Can a hands-on approach using simulation, measurement, and calculation tools help students learn the materials more effectively?" (3) "How can two related courses be redesigned to incorporate more cohesive and sequential elements between them?"Pedagogical MethodologyThe importance of visualization in effective student learning has been addressed and emphasized[10]. In the Electromagnetics course, there have been attempts such as PBL (Project BasedLearning) [11], Hands-on and labs [12], [13], Visualization using software [14] – [18],demonstrations adopting affordable equipment [19] – [22] to enhance
each lab o Design of lab by instructor/graduate students. ▪ Delivery of lab by graduate students. ▪ Feedback mechanism.• Mechanisms for enforcing cloud computing concepts and services: o Through projects and assignments. o Through targeted upper-level courses. o Through individualized capstone projects.• Resources made available to students: o Internal and external. o Free and for pay.• Cloud+ Certification: o Institutional resources. o Externally funded resources.By presenting our efforts, we hope that other institutions considering expanding their programsof study to include Cloud Computing, Cyber Security, and Cloud+ Certification can benefit fromour experience by
AI potentiallyposing an acute imminence of disruption to academic contexts, any policymaking or strategicintegration must recognize that students are both the key receptors of changes and the closestobservers that can flag both emerging opportunities and harms. The study thus has a time-sensitive charge of unveiling student beliefs while power is retained to guide the unfolding statusof AI.ContextThe context for the study is a freshman level design thinking course at a Tier 1 US university.The course is a required course and is offered in flipped format. All the course materials areshared with the students before the actual class through the learning management system andduring class time discussion and hands-on project work takes place. The
described here explores these current or baseline faculty attitudes as capturedby a survey sent to both department and college of engineering faculty members.The survey includes validated instruments on culturally responsive teaching, department climateand culture, psychological safety, climate for innovation, and feelings of community as it relatesto the goals and activities of the department transformation project, and perspectives, specificallyfrom computer engineering department faculty, on their personal alignment with andcommitment to the department vision, perceived and anticipated barriers to departmentaltransformation, and current priorities within the context of the project goals. This survey is partof a larger mixed method approach to
, whilethe topic of leadership development in engineering education programs is relatively new. Thispaper will summarize the findings of a scoping literature review on design competencies,leadership outcomes, and the intersection of the two in an engineering education setting.Research in design courses shows that topics commonly covered include professional skills,teamwork, project management, productive communication, and ethics in addition to technicalknowledge. Similarly, research on engineering leadership development has summarized a list ofoutcomes such as communication, teamwork, vision, interpersonal skills, ethics, organization,decision making, and time management in addition to technical knowledge. These observedsimilarities in outcomes of
/ automotive_training_video_details-id-118.html , 2011 Page 22.1029.15Appendix 1: Summary of MET 418 / 419 Mechanical Design Lab Activities at CWUTo give context to the transmission labs outlined in this paper, the following list of lab activities for theMechanical Design courses at CWU has been included. The labs continue to evolve each year. Lab topicsfor the 2010-11 academic year courses are outlined below:MET 418 Mechanical Design 1 Lab 1: Free Body Diagram Review & Workshop Lab 2: Group Design Project (Cooperative Design): Introduction & Requirements Development Groups work cooperatively on different modules of one larger project