andTeaching at Merrimack College. Beyond Augustinian pedagogy, his teaching and research have included work oninstructional technology, curriculum, educational policy, theology, women’s studies, popular culture andsustainability.Mr. Franklin Miguel is currently a civil engineering student at Merrimack College. He can be contacted atmiguelf@merrimack.edu. 6
Navigating the COVID landscape with a Mechanical Engineering Junior Laboratory Prof. Charles S. White Department of Mechanical Engineering, Norwich UniversityAbstractAt the author’s institution, all Mechanical Engineering undergraduate students are required totake a two semester laboratory course sequence covering topics in measurement andinstrumentation. As with most hands-on instruction, the restrictions imposed by the COVIDpandemic required significant adjustments to the course, especially the number of studentsthat were permitted in the laboratory space at any given time. In this paper a comparison ismade between the Fall semester course from before the pandemic (Fall 2019) and the samecourse
firstmeeting [5]; its website has since become a hub for STEM ethics education materials.A brief overview of QIS education and QIS education researchQuantum information science (QIS) is an emerging interdisciplinary field at the intersection ofphysics, computer science, electrical engineering, and mathematics leveraging the laws ofquantum mechanics to circumvent classical limitations on information processing. The NationalScience and Technology Council’s Subcommittee on Quantum Information Science identifiesfour key areas of fundamental research within QIS: quantum sensing, quantum computing,quantum networking, and broader scientific advances enabled by advances in quantum theory anddevices [6]. Fueled in part by the National Quantum Initiative Act of
achieved by the integration of the contemporaryinformation technology (IT) and visualization tools in teaching engineering technology.Although the classroom environment in Engineering and Construction Science is highlystructured by the instructor, teaching students to be critical thinkers is essential in the virtualclassroom of the future. The objective of this research was to develop a virtual tour of areinforced concrete building construction using 3D animation and walkthrough. All thetechniques that were used in this research employed a generic programming architecture, whichwas discipline independent and could be adapted to any other similar domain. Thesevisualization techniques can be valuable aids not only in teaching in the classroom but
. This type of innovative approach for allowing students to become involved in realisticopen-ended design problems is beneficial for enhancing their problem solving skills andencourages them to pursue graduate studies. The engineering clinics emphasizemultidisciplinary design on projects of progressive complexity. This paper focuses on the designand development of experiments to illustrate membrane technology for pollution prevention. Amultidisciplinary student team conducted a t horough literature search and developed innovativemembrane experiments to demonstrate pollution prevention. These experiments can be used byvarious disciplines in engineering such as environmental and chemical engineering.IntroductionMembrane technology has
AC 2007-2552: ATTRACTING AND RETAINING MINORITIES INPROFESSORIAL RANKSAngela Lemons, NC A&T State University Angela Lemons is a full-time Instructor in the Department of Electronics, Computer, and Information Technology at North Carolina A&T State University. She is currently working on her Doctorate degree at Nova Southeastern University in Information Systems with a concentration in Information Security. She teaches Computer Hardware and Software, Information Technology Project Management, Network Security, and other courses within the Information Technology program. Her area of research/technology interest is security. Angela Lemons and colleague Ronnie Rollins started an
Paper ID #36891Introducing Arduino Library Kits for CheckoutJames Thomas Mcallister (Engineering and Honors College Librarian) Engineering and Honors College Librarian at the University of Arkansas. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.comIntroducing Arduino Library Kits for CheckoutIntroductionThe availability of technology kits of various kinds in academic libraries is becoming moreprevalent. During the summer and fall of 2021, the engineering librarian at the University ofArkansas – Fayetteville Mullins library conducted a process to implement the
AC 2008-1611: ACTIVE LEARNING ACROSS THE COMPUTER SCIENCECURRICULUMWilliam Birmingham, Grove City CollegeVincent DiStasi, Grove City College Page 13.144.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Active Learning Across the CS Curriculum1. IntroductionThe general idea of active learning is to engage students during lecture with a variety of thingsthat actively involve them in the material being presented. Through active engagement, studentsare highly encouraged to focus attention on the lecture. While active learning holds greatpromise, it also raises several important issues: designing materials for lecture that incorporateactive learning while keeping
of the Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering Educationcourses, provide focus to the curriculum in the APM. Furthermore, all courses are designed toclearly show the experiences that students draw upon while achieving a Learning Outcome.The College of Information Systems at ZU seeks to produce graduates who have anunderstanding of information technology and its uses, and who are capable of identifying andsolving problems. The college has established five major leaning outcomes which form the basisfor curriculum analysis and student assessment: • Problem identification and analysis • Problem solving
Paper ID #37192Professional merit in engineering career advancement:Student perspectives and critiquesRobert Loweth Robert P. Loweth is an (incoming) Visiting Assistant Professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. His research explores how engineering students and practitioners engage stakeholders in their engineering projects, reflect on their social identities, and consider the broader societal contexts of their engineering work. The goals of his research are 1) to develop tools and pedagogies that support engineers in achieving the positive societal changes that they envision and
Learning in the College of Engineering at a stateuniversity in Pennsylvania.A white male undergraduate student at a state university in California who is studyingPsychology and Ethnic Studies with a minor in Entrepreneurship.We acknowledge that our own personal backgrounds likely impacted the interpretation of thedata collected in this study.Participants:The criteria for the interviewees were that they had to have started a technology-based companyeither during or immediately after their undergraduate or graduate career and whose venturesceased operation without selling the venture or achieving a traditional “exit” event. Allinterviewees studied engineering or a related field in technology development. All teams musthave received at least $5,000
the student-led boards of UC SanDiego’s NSBE, SHPE, and SWE student chapters. In 2016, the IDEA Center helped launch astudent chapter of Out in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (oSTEM), anational society for LGBTQA communities in STEM fields. Additional student chapters ofdiversity organizations now served by the IDEA Center include Women in Computing and, mostrecently, the Society of Asian Scientists and Engineers.Academic Achievement Program: The Academic Achievement Program is a two-fold initiativethat includes both a study skills course and a process for early academic intervention that isembedded into participating engineering courses. The “ENG 15: Engineer Your Success” courseuses Raymond Landis’s Studying Engineering
writing,” Coll. English, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 610–617, 1979.[20] J. Colwell, J. Whittington, and C. F. Jenks, “Writing Challenges for Graduate Students in Engineering and Technology,” 2011, doi: 10.18260/1-2--18722.[21] A. Selzer King, K. R. Moore, S. Frankel, and A. Hardage Edlin, “Drawing Strategies for Communication Planning: A Rationale and Exemplar of the Geometric Page Form (GPF) Approach,” ACM'S Spec. Inte. Group on the Des. of Info., 2017.[22] A. S. King and A. H. Edlin, “Structured drawing tasks support research ideation : A mentor-mentee report on iteration, invention, and collaboration,” ACM'S Spec. Inte
Engineering, KLE Technologi- cal University, India. He is a certified IUCEE International Engineering Educator. He was awarded the ’Ing.Paed.IGIP’ title at ICTIEE, 2018.Dr. Brooke Charae Coley, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus Brooke Coley, PhD is an Assistant Professor in Engineering at the Polytechnic School of the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University. Dr. Coley is Principal Investigator of the Shifting Perceptions, Attitudes and Cultures in Engineering (SPACE) Lab that aspires to elevate the experiences of marginalized populations, dismantle systematic injustices, and transform the way inclusion is culti- vated in engineering through the implementation of novel technologies and
engineering withmarginalized identities navigate their workplace cultures, specifically looking at howthey can authentically be themselves. The data shown within this presentation werecollected as part of a larger NSF-funded study qualitatively assessing themanifestation of racism within the technology industry.From literature, we know that Black engineers leave their workplaces at a higher ratethan White engineers. This is largely due to the toxic workplace environments definedby White men that are unwelcoming for minoritized people [1], [2]. With this work,we intend to understand their experiences and combat racism in tech. The narrativesshared by the participants will provide a depiction of what is occurring in tech. Theintention of this is to
; she has served as a Co-PI on three research projects, including one on transfer students and another on student veterans in engineering.Dr. Catherine E. Brawner, Research Triangle Educational Consultants Catherine E. Brawner is President of Research Triangle Educational Consultants. She received her Ph.D.in Educational Research and Policy Analysis from NC State University in 1996. She also has an MBA from Indiana University (Bloomington) and a bachelor’s degree from Duke University. She specializes in eval- uation and research in engineering education, computer science education, and technology education. Dr. Brawner is a founding member and former treasurer of Research Triangle Park Evaluators, an Ameri- can
argue thatproviding opportunities to foster contextual awareness and student engagement should result ingreater satisfaction for all students.BackgroundEducators, professionals and policy-makers alike recognize that contemporary engineering mustbe studied and practiced in context. The National Academy of Engineering (NAE) envisions an“Engineer of 2020” who demonstrates “dynamism, agility, resilience, and flexibility” to designfor an uncertain and rapidly changing world.1 Contextual conditions like a fragile globaleconomy, increased mobility of jobs and workers, rapid development of information andcommunication technologies, growing calls for social responsibility,2 and rising complexity ofengineered products3 all warrant engineering students
students lack a clear vision of themselves as engineers in thefuture. Because engineering, science, technology and management are blending into a whole,she believes that the formerly well-defined boundaries around what constituted engineering arebecoming less distinct. As engineering expands and career trajectories become increasinglycomplex it can be expected that students will find “engineering” increasingly difficult tovisualize and navigate 44. As students are faced with ever more complex career possibilitieswithin engineering, educators need to help raise students’ awareness for these opportunities andactively help them connect course content to the actual work of practicing engineers. This couldhelp students develop a more specific vision of
engineering. Choice is a powerfulinstrument, allowing students with these aspirations to select courses that meet their goals.Increasingly, institutions have a range of minors and certificates available for students at theinterface between society and technology. This approach, however, may allow students withvirtually no interest or awareness of societal context to avoid becoming educated on these issues.The proposed changes in the ABET EAC accreditation requirements appear to lower theminimum bar for engineering educational outcomes in this regard.35-36 Increasing the socialscience and humanities (SSH) requirements for students may help achieve these aims. Manyinstitutions have a common core, which requires that students take SSH electives with
questionnaire." British Journal of Educational Technology 46, no. 4 (2014): 848-63. doi:10.1111/bjet.12181.12. Mann, Karen, Jill Gordon, and Anna MacLeod. "Reflection and reflective practice in health professions education: a systematic review." Advances in Health Sciences Education 14, no. 4 (2007): 595-621. doi:10.1007/s10459-007-9090-2.13. Prince, Michael. "Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research." Journal of Engineering Education 93, no. 3 (July 2004): 223-31. doi:10.1002/j.2168- 9830.2004.tb00809.x.14. Thomas, Lauren D., Mania Orand, Kathryn Elizabeth Shroyer, Jennifer A. Turns, and Cynthia J. Atman. "Tips & Tricks for Successful Implementation of Reflection Activities in Engineering Education." Paper presented
does acknowledge systems thinking, yetsuch references are few and typically made in passing (e.g., [10]). In a few cases, (e.g., [21])there is a deeper treatment, but the focus is on technology or the engineered system and less onunderstanding and optimizing the function of social system. An important exception to thistheme has been explored in Engineers Without Borders as will be explained later in this paper. We suggest that the ability of engineers to think in systems terms promotes their leadershipskills in team and organizational settings. Better development of this thread is likely to providesubstantial benefits in engineering leadership development. Such an approach can complementand augment the prevalent initiatives for
Engineering (ILead). She completed her PhD at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) studying product development decision-making during complex industry projects. Dr. Olechowski completed her BSc (Engineering) at Queen’s Uni- versity and her MS at MIT, both in Mechanical Engineering. Dr. Olechowski studies the processes and tools that teams of engineers use in industry as they design innovative new products. She has studied engineering products and projects in the automotive, electronics, aerospace, medical device and oil & gas industries.Ms. Madeleine Santia c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Examining the Engineering Leadership Literature: Community of
Paper ID #19133Career Certainty: Differences Between Career Certain and Uncertain Engi-neering StudentsMr. Bernhard Schadl, Stanford University Bernhard Schadl is a visiting student researcher at the Designing Education Lab of Dr. Sheri Sheppard. Bernhard completed a MSc. in Management and Technology from the Technical University of Munich.Dr. Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University Sheri D. Sheppard, Ph.D., P.E., is professor of Mechanical Engineering at Stanford University. Besides teaching both undergraduate and graduate design and education related classes at Stanford University, she conducts research on engineering
Director of One Page Solutions, a consulting firm that uses the OGSP R process to help technology and branded product clients develop better strategic plans. Mark is a member of The Band of Angels, Silicon Valley’s oldest organization dedicated exclusively to funding seed stage start-ups. In addition, he serves on the board of several technology start-up companies.Sophia Lerner Pink, Stanford University Sophia Pink is a sophomore studying engineering at Stanford University. She began conducting research in Dr. Sheri Sheppard’s Designing Education Lab in June 2016. Sophia’s academic interests include mechanical engineering, human-centered design and social science research.Kayla Powers, Stanford UniversityMr. Adrian Piedra
technology that did notpreviously exist in the curriculum. He reported that local industry has found the course valuable and hebelieves the new course is uniquely preparing his students for careers in that branch of engineering.Greg had a career in manufacturing and brings advanced manufacturing techniques into the department,allowing students to build systems that were not previously possible and collaborating with researchers inthe department.Capstone and introductory courses seem to be particularly well-suited for teaching faculty. Capstone is aparticularly good fit for participants like Alan and Greg who had engineering management experience andso could model the type of design processes and skills that are necessary in a product development
students formulate as they come toidentify with various social, academic, personal, and professional groups. Simply speaking,identity is not as singular as how an individual perceives themselves in isolation from otheraspects of their personality. Often individuals project different parts of their identity asdependent on the environment and context. In doing so individuals are continuously doing andundoing their identities to suit their needs in the moment.In Science and Math Science, technology, engineering and math (STEM) disciplines have turned to identitytheories as a way to identify talented individuals in efforts to fuel recruitment and retention. Tothis end, many have sought to define what it means to have a science 24; 27; 44 or
Kitchener’s model exhibited such openness.36 Engineering education scholars can begindeveloping empathy for effective collaboration among themselves, with their students, andamong their students by some combination of conflict resolution techniques, communicationtraining programs, and team-skills training.Lastly, given the growth of online education and the technological manifestations that allowinteraction by virtual media, some scholars have focused on how empathy functions betweencollaborators interacting online. For example, Nguyen and Canny72 found that empathymanifests differently in two types of video interactions. When they compared between “head-only” and “upper-body” framing, they found that the latter produced a significantly higher
includestudents from Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) majors.These articles were published in 1 conference proceeding and 6 journals: ASEE conferenceproceeding (9), Journal of Engineering Education (6), European Journal of EngineeringEducation (1), International Journal of Engineering Education (1), International Journal forService Learning in Engineering (1), Journal of Women and Minorities in Science andEngineering (1), The Journal of Higher Education (1), Research in Higher Education (3).Table 1Summary of Research on Engineering Student Out of Class InvolvementAuthor/Year Article Source Research Types of Participants Methods
Paper ID #21392Measuring Engineering Students’ Metacognition with a Think-Aloud Proto-colDr. Carolyn Plumb, Montana State University Carolyn Plumb is the recently retired Director of Educational Innovation and Strategic Projects in the College of Engineering at Montana State University (MSU). Plumb has been involved in engineering education and program evaluation for 30 years, and she continues to work on externally funded projects relating to engineering education.Rose M. Marra, University of Missouri Rose M. Marra is a Professor of Learning Technologies at the University of Missouri. She is PI of the NSF-funded
Paper ID #25301An Exploratory Study of Engineering Students’ Misconceptions about Tech-nical CommunicationDr. Cheryl Q. Li, University of New Haven Cheryl Qing Li joined University of New Haven in the fall of 2011, where she is a Senior Lecturer of the Industrial, System & Multidisciplinary Engineering Department. Li earned her first Ph.D. in me- chanical engineering from National University of Singapore in 1997. She served as Assistant Professor and subsequently Associate Professor in mechatronics engineering at University of Adelaide, Australia, and Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, respectively. In 2006