Predominantly White Research Universities. American Educational Research Journal 48, 1032-1057 (2011).44 West, C. & Zimmerman, D. H. Doing gender. Gender & society 1, 125-151 (1987).45 Connell, R. W. (Polity Press in association with Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Cambridge, 2002).46 Griffin, K. A. Voices of the “Othermothers”: Reconsidering Black professors’ relationships with Black students as a form of social exchange. Journal of Negro Education 82, 169-183 (2013).47 Malcom, S. M., Hall, P. Q. & Brown, J. W. (American Association for the Advancement of Science Washington, DC).48 Seymour, E. The loss of women from science, mathematics, and engineering undergraduate majors: An explanatory account. Science Education 79
., and D. V. Watkins, “Beyond Leadership,” International Journal of Business and Social Science, Vol. 3, No. 4, 2012, pp. 22-30.20. Schindel, W.D., S.N. Peffers, J.H. Hanson, J. Ahmed, and W.A. Kline, “All Innovation is Innovation of Systems: An Integrated 3-D Model of Innovation Competencies,” Presented at American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Vancouver, Canada, 2011. Available online at: http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CCkQFjAA&url= http%3A%2F%2Fwww.asee.org%2Fpublic%2Fconferences%2F1%2Fpapers%2F1370%2Fdownload&ei= 88C4UtKlIOKbygH2z4GgAw&usg=AFQjCNF0gIcZcdvgiM1n_hBbCUsxkYq9RQ&bvm=bv.58187178,d. aWc
24.1035.13Traditionally, the team-instructor interaction on design projects mostly takes place during thereview presentations in class. For example, after all teams present their design process/outcometo the whole class, the instructor interacts with each team during the limited Q&A minutes. Thedisadvantage is that the instructor often spends a significant amount of the interaction timecorrecting every team’s similar mistakes in using the design method instead of demonstratinghow the instructor would design differently. As a consequence, it is common that the grading ofdesign presentations is largely determined based on “how correctly the methods were used”instead of “how creatively the problem was solved”.6. Conclusion and future worksThis paper presented
York: McGraw-Hill, revised ed., 1992.[25] Y. Wang, J. Ostermann, and Y.-Q. Zhang, Video Processing and Communications. Prentice-Hall, 2002.[26] “Texas Instruments SYS/BIOS real-time kernel,” 2013. http://www.ti.com/tool/sysbios.[27] “OpenCV website,” 2013. http://opencv.org/.[28] Educational DSP (eDSP), L.L.C., “DSP resources for TI DSKs.” http://www.educationaldsp.com/. Page 24.1062.12
. Patton, M. Q. Qualitative evaluation and research methods. (Sage, 2002).46. Harrell, M. C. & Bradley, M. A. Data collection methods: Semi-structured interviews and focus groups. 148 (2009).47. Corbin, J. & Strauss, A. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. (Sage, 1998).48. Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Dickinson, W. B., Leech, N. L. & Zoran, A. G. A qualitative framework for collecting and analyzing data in focus group research. Int. J. Qual. Methods 8, 1–21 (2009).49. Bandura, A. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. (W.H. Freeman, 1997).50. Bandura, A. Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 52, 1–26 (2001).51. Brown, J. S., Collins
Inventory Assessment Instruments for Electromagnetic Education,” in Proc., IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society Int. Symp., San Antonio, Texas, 2002.13. Hake, R., “Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses,” Amer. J. of Phys., Vol. 66, No. 64, 1998.14. Camtasia Studio 8.0, TechSmith, available at http://www.techsmith.com/camtasia.html, accessed January 3, 2014.15. Stickel, M., Liu, Q., and Hari, S., “The Effect of the Inverted Classroom Teaching Approach on Student/Faculty Interaction and Students’ Self-Efficacy,”, Proceedings 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, IN, June 2014
Structural Equations Modeling,” Manag. Inf. Syst. Q., vol. 22, no. 1, p. 14, Mar. 1998.[8] S. J. Finney and C. DiStefano, “Non-Normal and Categorical Data in Structural Equation Modeling,” in Structural Equation Modeling: A Second Course, United States of America: Information Age Publishing, Inc., 2006, pp. 269 – 314.[9] C. M. Cunningham and C. P. Lachapelle, “The impact of Engineering is Elementary (EiE) on students’ attitudes toward engineering and science,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Louisville, KY, 2010.[10] IBM Corporation, IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows. Armonk, NY: IBM Corporation, 2012.[11] L. K. Muthén and B. O. Muthen, Mplus. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén, 2012.[12] D. Hooper, J. Coughlan, and M. R
. Quizzes were administered onpaper and collected after three minutes of work. After collecting the students’ work, the quiz wasimmediately debriefed at the board and document camera so that students received instantfeedback. Page 24.1233.9Following the Q&A time and the Entrance Quiz, the class was typically left with about 30minutes to work on class activities. As described above, these activities were often taken fromthe Activities in the Active Calculus book and modified to fit the particular needs of theaudience. Most were on the cognitive level of homework that would be assigned for out-of-classwork in a traditional setting. Students were
. Mortazavi-Asl, Q. Chen, U. Dayal, and M.C. Hsu, “ [17] Salfner, Felix, Maren Lenk, and Miroslaw Malek. "A survey of online FreeSpan: Frequent Pattern-Projected Sequential Pattern Mining,” Proc. failure prediction methods." ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) Vol 42, ACM SIGKDD Int’l
work at school and in professional design practice, Cultures of Computing, Susan Leigh Star (Ed.) London: Basil Blackwell.14. Nguyen, D. Q. (1998). The essential skills and attributes of an engineer: A comparative study of academics, industry personnel and engineering students. Global Journal of Engineering Education, 2, 1, 65–76.15. Orr, J. (1996). Talking about machines: An ethnography of a modern job. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, N.Y.16. Knight, D., Sullivan, J., Louie, B. (2007). Expanding understanding of first-year engineering student retention and team effectiveness through social styles assessment. In Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition.17. Hutchins. (1995). Cognition in the wild
question is included to provide the context for the quote; in these cases a ‘Q’ willprecede the question.ResultsMany more themes emerged throughout the interview analysis than can be discussed herein. Theideas presented are those thought to be most interesting to faculty of any engineering class asinspiration for a more active or socially connected course. The code book in Appendix Acontains additional relevant themes discussed by the interviewees.Student Definitions of Social ResponsibilityEven though the EPRA survey defined social responsibility as “an obligation that an individual(or company) has to act with concern and sensitivity, aware of the impacts of their action onothers, particularly the disadvantaged,” interviewees were asked their own
Payback period and breakeven analysis 11 11/6 Valuation and depreciation 12 11/13 Data center Q&A session 13 11/20 Inflation and its effect on rate of return 14 12/4 Project Management: Critical path method 15 12/11 Project Management: Critical path method 16 12/18 Final examIn addition to the data center assignment, the ECE students were required to write a businessplan for a start-up company of their choosing. The purpose of the business plan was to havestudents develop business models and marketing strategies for a business start-up and map thoseto
://www.ep.soe.vt.edu/ms/.8. B. D. Jones, An examination of motivation model components in face-to-face and online instruction, Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 8(3), 2010, pp. 915-944.9. W. C. Lee, R. L. Kajfez and H. M. Matusovich, Motivating engineering students: Evaluating an engineering student support center with the MUSIC model of academic motivation, Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 19(3), 2013, pp. 245-271.10. M. Q. Patton, Qualitative research and evaluation methods Sage Publications, Inc, 2002.11. J. W. Creswell, Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches 3, 3, Sage Publications, Inc, Thousand Oaks, California 2009.12. D. E
the students,and the scope of what they can accomplish in two semesters is limited, we also encourage theexternal industry sponsors of our projects to provide the students with helpful feedback, during(live or teleconferenced) sponsor meetings, and during the Q&A periods of student presentationsto which the sponsors are invited, to help our students better apprehend the real-worldconsiderations that affect important business aspects of product commercialization, such as themanufacturability and marketability of their designs. This industry participation helps thestudents “keep their feet on the ground” and helps to ensure that their projects will be more thanjust an academic exercise that only looks good on paper – ideally, we would like
, pg 235-250, 2010.15. Mihelcic, J.R., J.C. Crittenden, M.J. Small, D.R. Shonnard, D.R. Hokanson, Q. Zhang, H. Chen, S.A.! Sorby, V.U. James, J.W. Sutherland, J.L. Schnoor, “Sustainability Science and Engineering: Emergence of a New Metadiscipline,” Environmental Science & Technology, 37(23):5314-5324, 2003.16. Orr, David (1997) "Architecture as Pedagogy II" Conservation Biology 11(3) 597-60017. Parks, Sharon Daloz (2005) Leadership Can Be Taught, Ch 1. Harvard Business School Press.18. Petersen, John E (2008) "A Green Curriculum Involves Everyone on the Campus" Chronicle of Higher Education June 20, 2008 54(41) A2519. Ponting, Clive, 1993. A Green History of the World: The Environment and the Collapse of Great
センター年報 Res. Clin. Cent. Child Dev. Annu. Rep. 6, 27–36 (1984).59. Kimball, D. R. & Holyoak, K. J. Transfer and expertise. Oxf. Handb. Mem. 109–122 (2000).60. Hatano, G. Cognitive consequences of practice in culture specific procedural skills. Q. Newsl. Lab. Comp. Hum. Cogn. 4, 15–18 (1982).61. Lin, X., Schwartz, D. L. & Bransford, J. Intercultural adaptive expertise: Explicit and implicit lessons from Dr. Hatano. Hum. Dev. 50, 65–72 (2007).62. Schwartz, D. L., Bransford, J. D. & Sears, D. Efficiency and innovation in transfer. Transf. Learn. Mod. Multidiscip. Perspect. 1–51 (2005).63. Fisher, F. T. & Peterson, P. L. A tool to measure adaptive expertise in biomedical engineering students. in Proc. 2001 Am. Soc
classrooms” have recently received increasing interest.1 In these classrooms, instructor-centered in-class lectures are replaced by student-centered learning activities such as problemsolving, Q & A sessions, etc. It challenges the accustomed traditional methods of collegeeducation and influences engineering education at every level: individual instructors, studentgroups, departments, colleges, and institutions. Proponents believe it is an inevitable trend inengineering undergraduate education, which brings deep learning to realization. Because coursecontent is digitized and posted online in “flipped classrooms”, in-class periods now can be usedfor interactive and purposeful activities. It allows flexibilities in how instructors operate
of surveys completed by individuals Table 4 – The Survey Questions and the Surveys in which they were asked (Highlighted: 1,3,4,7,16,17,20,22,23,24 – 10 consistently asked competency questions)Q # Question 1A 1B 2A 2B 3&4 ABILITY TO MANAGE INFORMATION AND PROCESSES1 I am confident in my ability to scope, plan and manage a process * 1 1 1 12 I am confident in my ability to gather, interpret, validate and use information
Problem Solving h. Apply creative thinking to ambiguous problems i. Apply systems thinking to complex problems j. Examine technical feasibility, economic drivers, and societal and individual needs k. Act upon analysis expressed through PROFESSIONAL SKILLS3. Productive Collaboration l. Collaborate in a team setting m. Understand the motivations and perspectives of stakeholders4. Illuminating Communication n. Communicate engineering solutions in economic terms o. Substantiate claims with data and facts and founded on CHARACTER5. Resolute Integrity p. Pursue personal fulfillment as a member of a profession that creates value q. Identify personal passions and a plan for professional
UY. Test Case 5 harmonic response plots are incorrect. Q OK, but natural frequencies OK, except the user has to specify OK listed in rad/s instead of Hz. the freq. range in rad/s, while Also, there is a node instructions specify Hz. Phase numbering problem in the angles are reported in radians, printed mode shapes. instead of degrees, as specified in the instructions, and sign is wrong on the phase angles