President of the Student Government Association, and a member of the MSU chapter of the National Society of Black Engineers. Active in community outreach, he is also President of SMOOTH, an innovative student organization fostering Black male achievement and collaboration across disciplines, backgrounds and cultures.Dr. Keyanoush Sadeghipour, Temple University Keya Sadeghipour is currently a Professor of Mechanical Engineering and Bioengineering and serves as the Dean of the College of Engineering since 2003. He is a graduate of Mechanical Engineering from the University of Manchester Institute of Technology, UK which is now the University of Manchester. He has been involved in receiving over $7 M funding from various
students’ priorknowledge that is applied to real projects through individual and/or team based structures [6]. As such, arevitalized approach to capstones within building engineering is logical.In response to the curricula needs on the topic of collaborative multi-disciplinary design, an industryfoundation (The Thornton Tomasetti Foundation) supported a senior design capstone course that exposedfuture project managers to work on highly collaborative teams [7]. Based on the foundation’srecommendation and an early pilot study [8], the material developed there transformed how one optionfor the capstone project within Penn State Architectural Engineering (AE) is conducted. The discussion ofthis paper reports of 9 years of implementing a multi
emphasis includes faculty development and mentoring, graduate student development, critical thinking and communication skills, enhancing mathematical student success in Calculus (including Impact of COVID-19), and promoting women in STEM. Her technical research focuses on sustainable chemical process design, computer aided design, and multicriteria decision making. She also has extensive experience in K-12 STEM education and program evaluation and assessment. She has held a variety of administrative positions: 1) Director of STEM Faculty Development Initiatives-Clemson, 2) Associate Dean for Undergraduate Studies in the College of Engineering, Computing and Applied Sciences-Clemson, 3) Interim Director of Student
the type of intervention. The study is not longitudinal, not all interventions wereimplemented for the same group of students.The first-year intervention occurred in the introduction to engineering course. All engineeringand computer science majors take an introduction to engineering course during their first fallsemester. In fall 2015, all sections of the course included a one-lecture workshop on diversity inSTEM. The workshop was designed and led by an academic advisor who works with at-riskengineering students. Goals of the first-year intervention: • Increase awareness of the lack of diversity among students and professionals in engineering. • Increase awareness of privilege as it relates to identity, majority and
at the college of engineering, computer science and technology (ECST).Prof. Paul S Nerenberg, California State University, Los Angeles Dr. Paul S. Nerenberg is currently an Assistant Professor of Physics and Biology at California State University, Los Angeles. He received his PhD in Physics from MIT and has a strong interest in improving the quality of introductory physics education, particularly for students who enter college with little or no previous physics coursework.Ni Li, Northwestern Polytechnial University Ni Li, Ph.D., was an Assistant Professor of the Department of Mechanical Engineering at California State University, Los Angeles. Now, she is working in the school of Aeronautics at Northwestern
educational opportunities into the curriculum through capstone design courses, realistic case studies facilitated by professional engineers, mentorship experiences, and interviews with engineering leaders across the career trajectory. Each of these activities can be used to help engineering students value and develop organizational skills before they secure their first job. 4) While the relatively recent introduction of accreditation bodies (ABET, CEAB) to engineering education may feel like a constraint to many professors, the graduate attributes generated by these bodies can be used creatively as a pedagogical framework. When used as a regulatory checklist, the
Future Careers Over Time,” in Frontiers in Education Conference, 2018.[17] C. D. McGough, “A Mixed Methods Study on Mid-Year Engineering Students’ Perceptions of their Future Possible Careers,” 2019.[18] C. McGough, A. Kirn, and L. Benson, “Different Perceptions of Future Careers for Mid- Year Engineering Students,” J. Eng. Educ.[19] C. McGough, A. Kirn, and L. Benson, “Work in Progress : Developing a Quantitative Instrument for Measuring Undergraduate Engineering Students ’ Future Time Perspectives,” in American Society for Engineering Education, 2016.[20] A. Kirn and L. C. Benson, “Engineering Students’ Perceptions of Problem Solving and their Future,” J. Eng. Educ., 2018.[21] H.-F. Hsieh and S. E
in the Public Policy Center, and director of the Center for Research on Undergraduate Education at the University of Iowa. His research uses a social psychological lens to explore key issues in higher education, including student success, diversity and equity, admissions, rankings, and quantitative research methodology. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Systems Engineering Initiative for Student Success (SEISS) Framework for Transforming Organizational Designs Arunkumar Pennathur1*, Priyadarshini Pennathur1, Emily Blosser2, Nicholas Bowman3 1 Department of Industrial, Manufacturing and Systems Engineering, University of Texas at El Paso
work is part of a larger study exploring the experiences of rural engineering students. Inaddition to investigating the motivations behind rural students’ decisions to pursue engineering,the study explored the formation of engineering identity and barriers rural students face whileentering an engineering community of practice [20]. A sample of the questions developed tospecifically probe the research question of this paper is as follows: • Why did you choose to attend college? • Why did you choose this university? • Why did you choose an engineering major? • What motivates you? • After graduation, do you plan to return to your rural community? Why or why not?Data AnalysisInterviews were recorded and transcribed by a
authors made a list of freshmen lost opportunities that included: • Students may have some friends, but not a peer support network, study circle, or community of learning. • Students see faculty as distant entities, if a faculty talks to you is because you are in trouble. • Students don’t see themselves as part of research labs. • Students don’t understand the benefits of joining an organization. • It takes various semesters to create a strong identity as an engineer. • Students feel that accessing resources implies that they cannot solve problems on their own. • Students think that it is enough to take the necessary courses and not engage in extracurricular activities. • Family is a strong
media forums to elicit narratives of graduate engineering student attrition. Journal of Engineering Education, 109(1), 125–147. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20299Berdanier, C. G., & Zerbe, E. (2018). Quantitative Investigation of Engineering Graduate Student Conceptions and Processes of Academic Writing. 2018 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (ProComm), 138–145.Council of Graduate Schools. (2007). Ph.D. Completion and Attrition: Analysis of Baseline Program Data from the Ph.D. Completion Project.Cruz, J. M., Artiles, M. S., Lee-Tomas, G., Matusovich, H. M., & Adams, S. G. (2018). The Dissertation Institute: Evaluation of a Doctoral Student Writing Workshop. 2018 IEEE
, Virginia Tech Dr. Amelink is Director of Graduate Programs and Assessment in the College of Engineering, Virginia Tech. She is also an affiliate faculty member in the Departments of Engineering Education and Educa- tional Leadership and Policy Studies at Virginia Tech. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 A Multi-Program Approach to Student Retention and SuccessAbstractPrograms that address the needs of first year engineering students have traditionally beendesigned to create community and facilitate inclusion. Students are more likely to be retainedinto their second year when guided by structures of engagement and support throughpurposefully-designed programs (Soldner, Rowan-Keyon
of Doctoral Studies, 8(2103), 151-172. http://ijds.org/Volume8/IJDSv8p151-172Lundy- Wagner0381.pdfMayat, N., & Amosun, S. L. (2011). Perceptions of academic staff towards accommodating students with disabilities in a civil engineering undergraduate program in a university in South Africa. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 24(1), 53-59.McCall, C., Shew, A., Simmons, D. R., Paretti, M. C., & McNair, L. D. (2020b). Exploring student disability and professional identity: Navigating sociocultural expectations in U.S. undergraduate civil engineering programs. Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, 25(1), 79-89. https://doi.org/10.1080/22054952.2020.1720434McLoughlin, L. A. (2005
education. In addition, she has completed several graduate-level courses in the Department of Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies. Dr. Morrison’s public policy master’s thesis was a research study on diversity policy in the Center for Aviation Studies and whether or not that policy impacted students’ considerations for leaving the academic program. Her expertise is in curriculum de- velopment, especially as it pertains to women and underrepresented minorities in education. Dr. Morrison takes an interdisciplinary approach to research, using both qualitative and quantitative methods that were informed by her background in education and public policy. c American Society for Engineering Education
incorporating intersectionality into quantitative methodological approaches,” Review of Research in Education, vol. 42, no.1, pp. 72–92, 2018.[23] L. A. Clark and D. Watson, “Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development,” Psychological Assessment, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 309–319, 1995.[24] A. L. Griffith, “Persistence of women and minorities in STEM field majors: Is it the school that matters?” Economics of Education Review, vol. 29, no. 6, 2010. pp. 911–922, 2010.[25] B. D. Jones, M. C. Paretti, S. F. Hein, and T. W. Knott, “An analysis of motivation constructs with first-year engineering students: Relationships among expectancies, values, achievement, and career plans,” Journal of Engineering
within science, technology, engineeringand mathematics (STEM). For HBCUs, their success in graduating Black students in STEM washighlighted along with the missed opportunity of advancing their efforts to assist the U. S. goalof staying competitive within the STEM workforce (National Academies of Sciences,Engineering, and Medicine, 2019). For example, scholars found that HBCUs, while onlyaccounting for 3% of all post-secondary institutions in the United States, graduated 17% of allBlack students (Gasman & Nguyen, 2016). Additionally, as of 2019, 14.5% of Black graduateswere from HBCUs even though they made up less than 1% of all ABET-accredited programs(ABET, 2019; Deen, 2019; Fletcher et al., 2023). For Black women, a group representing
have used intersectionality tounderstand the experiences of students of color in higher education, few engineering educationstudies apply an intersectionality framework, particularly for WOC.After a short pilot study, we anticipate the survey results will generate three outcomes. First, thesurvey results will show what intersecting identities most impact the experience of WOC inengineering, and the extent to which these may operate differently for women of different racialethnic groups. Second, interview questions and potential themes will be created by groupingresults into clusters of intersectionality types or exemplars of intersecting identities. Finally, wewill generate strategies to overcome the challenge of the double bind for WOC in
andcomputational methods for structural analysis. A summary of the fatigue and related fracturemechanics content included in some popular Mechanics of Materials and Aerospace Structurestextbooks is included in Table A1 in Appendix A. It can be seen in Table A1 that the coverageof fatigue is cursory in typical Mechanics of Materials texts. Most aerospace structures textsinclude some coverage of fatigue topics, but still at an elementary level.A detailed, quantitative analysis of fatigue, requiring significant experience in techniques ofelasticity and study of the subject of fracture mechanics, is beyond the scope of undergraduatestudents and rightly finds a place among graduate studies in Aerospace Engineering. However,the importance of fatigue in
students compared to their male counterparts. Similar results wereobserved in a four-day engineering summer camp for girls [14], where participants had increasedinterest and understanding of engineering topics after camp completion. On the other hand, amixed-method study [15] on a six-day middle school engineering summer camp showed nostatistically significant change in participants’ intrinsic motivation, interest in engineeringcareers, self-efficacy, and self-determination based on the quantitative data. Nonetheless,qualitative data indicated that camp experience positively impacted participants’ outlook towardengineering and STEM careers and their awareness of STEM career requirements.The Friday Institute of Education S-STEM survey has been used
Illinois.Wright College’s student success rates measured by completion have been strong and improvingrelative to other national urban community colleges, but are below state and national averages.In 2015 the college piloted a selective guaranteed admission program, Engineering Pathways (EP),to one of the nation’s top engineering schools (The Grainger College of Engineering at theUniversity of Illinois Urbana Champaign, UIUC). Initial results for the small first-year cohort werevery positive: 89% transfer rate and all students who transferred to UIUC graduated. Theprogram’s initial success rested on a) cohort model with a small number of students and strongcontrols; b) co-branding that attracted local students interested in pursuing engineering at UIUCwho
. In developing the intervention activities, the investigative team consideredbest practices from a large body of literature on improving the retention and graduation rates ofunderrepresented minority students in STEM to address the following research question:Research Question. Does peer-led team learning through recitation labs in engineering coursesincrease students’ mathematics confidence, mathematics efficacy, engineering identity, andpersistence in engineering pathways?The team constructed the activities based on studies that highlighted the need for active andcollaborative learning environments to engage underrepresented minorities, specifically femalestudents, in engineering fields. These activities had high indicators for support to
, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE Publications, 2013.[45] J. Osborne, Best practices in quantitative methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2008.[46] C. Charyton and J. A. Merrill, “Assessing general creativity and creative engineering design in first year engineering students,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 98, no. 2, pp. 145–156, 2009.[47] S. Dewulf and C. Baillie, Case: Creativity in Art, Science and Engineering : how to Foster Creativity. Great Britain Department for Education and Employment, 1999.[48] K. Kazerounian and S. Foley, “Barriers to Creativity in Engineering Education: A Study of Instructors and Students Perceptions,” J. Mech. Des., vol. 129, no. 7, pp. 761–768, Feb. 2007.[49] W. B
Paper ID #21724Validity Evidence for the SUCCESS Survey: Measuring Non-Cognitive andAffective Traits of Engineering and Computing StudentsMr. Matthew Scheidt, Purdue University, West Lafayette Matthew Scheidt is a Ph.D. student in Engineering Education at Purdue University. He graduated from Purdue University with a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering, and The Ohio State University with a M.S. in Mechanical Engineering with a focus in Ultrasonic Additive Manufacturing. Matt is currently part of Dr. Allison Godwin’s STRIDE (Shaping Transformative Research on Identity and Diversity in Engineering) research group at Purdue.Dr
college inEthiopia. In those capacities, and their experiences as instructors, researchers, and departmentheads, they had an opportunity to learn about some challenges women in Ethiopia face inuniversities, especially in engineering.The two Black men research team members also have a sister who studied engineering(bachelor’s degree) and is pursuing a master’s degree in engineering. As siblings, who have closecontact with their sister to support her in her academic pursuit, they learned some of the struggleswomen in Ethiopia might face in higher education, especially in engineering departments.Further, both men know they haven't experienced the many challenges women students gothrough in engineering in Ethiopia. While some of their identities
methodologicalinsights on how to examine the research questions addressed in this proposal. We will build on these initialfindings to create surveys, revise interview protocols, collect larger-scale quantitative and qualitative data,design an intervention, and assess the effectiveness of the intervention. ReferencesAmerican Society for Engineering Education. (2019). Longitudinal retention and time-to-graduation report [Data file]. http://www.asee.orgAndres, L., & Carpenter, S. (1997). Today's higher education students: Issues of admission, retention, transfer, and attrition in relation to changing student demographics. Centre for Policy Studies in Education, University of British
general and first-generation SVEs in particular. Forexample, because many of these students overcame initial obstacles in higher education, theycould be a potential pool of effective mentors, both to other student veterans and to first-generation students.Women Student VeteransA paper on women student veterans will be presented in the Military and Veterans Division forthe ASEE 2018 Annual Conference.15 A graduate student at Clemson University is leading thiseffort.Preliminary Interview Findings on Women Student VeteransFrom: R. C. Atkinson, C., Mobley, C. E. Brawner, S. M. Lord, J. B. Main, and M. M. Camacho,“I Never Played the “Girl Card”: Experiences and Identity Intersections of Women StudentVeterans in Engineering,” Proceedings of the 2018
well understood that financial aid and academic supports are a large part ofthe retention equation, this study examines the impact of exposure to engineering math asa cognitive support on two successive years of freshmen that matriculated in Fall 2014and Fall 2015. This paper suggests that math remediation is critical, but must be done inan institutional context that successfully leverages student determination to succeed.The traditional faculty-led argument that “we are admitting poorly prepared students”could no longer serve as an explanatory factor, as the university’s undergraduate programadmissions had become increasingly competitive, and were generally more productiveyielding graduates. In the College of Engineering, SAT scores had
Paper ID #37272An Analysis of Low-Scoring Blind and Low-Vision Individuals’ SelectedAnswers on a Tactile Spatial Ability InstrumentDaniel Kane, Utah State University Daniel Kane is a graduate student at Utah State University pursuing a PhD in Engineering Education with a concurrent master’s degree in Civil Engineering. His research interests focus around the study of spatial ability with an emphasis on identifying patterns of spatial strategies and measuring spatial ability in blind and low vision populations.Dr. Natalie L. Shaheen Dr. Natalie L. Shaheen is an assistant professor of blind education at Illinois State
find work and buildprofessional identities. By presenting alumni’s multiple perspectives and diverse life paths,Vision Venture can help engineering students have more informed expectations about life aftergraduation and understand more vividly the flexible and wide range of options open to them withtheir engineering degree.[32] found a disheartening decrease in engineering students’ engagement with public welfareduring the course of their studies, attributed it to “three underlying ideological pillars:depoliticization, the technical/social dualism, and meritocracy,” and used quantitative measuresto make a strong case for these connections. However, the concept of the future self can add aqualitative dimension to this data. For instance, even
engineering-based integrated STEM. Compulsorycoursework driven by a teacher’s need to address specific academic standards in science andassociated with grades for students is likely to create a different environment for studentinteractions than elective, non-graded, informal experiences. In addition, existing studies oftenuse quantitative analyses to investigate associations between motivation, context, andengagement [28]. With small group work ubiquitous with STEM, the affordances and limitationsof small group activities must be considered.This study addresses the gap in the literature to explore the following research questions: 1) What differences, if any, are seen in the engineering practices middle school girls and boys display during