coordinator attended the workshop. Drs. Richard Felder and Rebecca Brent facilitated the workshop. Topics included active learning techniques such as think-‐pair-‐share, group projects, problem based learning and appropriate learning objectives. Transfer Programs from BRCC to LSU The grant calls for a “bridge type program” for transfer students. A survey of the current transfer students at BRCC and the potential students at both institutions indicated that the students wanted more information about classes, course transfers and scholarships, as well as opportunities for meeting other students, finding jobs and learning about career options
students registering forthis course represent many engineering departments. Of the 80 students, 27.5% are ChemicalEngineers, 38.75% are Electrical and/or Computer engineers, 6.25% are Materials Engineers,and 27.5% represent other engineering departments including Biomedical, Mechanical andAerospace, Industrial, Computer Science and Nuclear Engineering departments.In order to evaluate the minor program and its impact on students, we will gather data related tostudent self-reported skill gain, attitudes, perceptions, and dispositions towards nanoscience andnano-related careers. This data will be collected in the form of anonymous and confidentialsurveys throughout students’ participation in the minor program. In addition, we will trackstudents
transferat the 3rd year level from 2-year schools to a sub-set of the five-year engineering & engineeringtechnology programs at our university, and provides scholarship support of $8,000 per studentfor a total of 75 students. In support of this grant, our university is contributing $50,000 to ensurethat the TiPi transfer students have continuing financial support after the grant expires and helpthem graduate on time. The TiPi project is a collaborative effort of five academic departmentsfrom two colleges, the Enrollment Management & Career Services Division, and the Office ofFinancial Aid & Scholarships. Table 1 lists the departments and their offerings. Table 1: Participating Colleges, Academic Departments, and
College of Vanderbilt Univer- sity. Her teaching interests relate to the professional development of graduate engineering students and to leadership, policy, and change in STEM education. Primary research projects explore the preparation of graduate students for diverse careers and the development of reliable and valid engineering education assessment tools. She is a NSF Faculty Early Career (CAREER) and Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE) recipient.Mr. Paul Carrick Brunson, Paul Carrick Brunson AgencyMs. Nikitha Sambamurthy, Purdue University, West Lafayette Nikitha Sambamurthy is pursuing a Ph.D. in Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her research interests include: blended
andmaking presentations, all while working as a part of a team. This project was designed to meetmany of the course objectives as well as to develop skills that will be needed in many of theirfuture engineering classes.This paper presents an overview of the project and individual assignments as well as theoutcomes and feedback from the students that participated in the project. The plans for furthermodifications and improvements to this project and assignments will also be presented.IntroductionThe Introduction to Engineering course at Grand Valley State University (GVSU) is a one creditcourse that is designed to be an introduction to engineering as a career. It discusses the majorfields of engineering and the typical responsibilities of an
the field while allowing theundergraduate career, which capstone courses they will take. students to focus on different areas within bioengineering.Then they will have to plan their course of study with the end Each pathway will culminate in a capstone course during thein mind: the burden of course selection was on the students senior year in either the 7th or 8th semester of study in a four-with advising from the department faculty. year curriculum. The proposed pathways for students to choose from are as follows:B. The Biology Issue As a bioengineering program, we agreed that in-depth
paper describes a unique multidisciplinary engineering conference program that bringstogether faculty and their students within a one-day program called, the “IEEE Green Energy andSystems Conference” (IGESC). A study, along with observations made before, during, and afterthe Conference offered preliminary findings regarding faculty and student’s perceptions ofdifferent projects influencing student research and career choices.IntroductionIn the present global energy and environmental context, the aim of reducing the emissions ofgreenhouse gases and polluting substances has become primary importance. Transforming fromusing fossil fuel to green energy for a better environment is the top issue on the world today.Renewable energy or green energy is
pursue educational and career pathways in the high-growth, high-paying STEM sector.Over the past 10 years, growth in STEM jobs [in the United States] was three times as fast asgrowth in non-STEM jobs.9 STEM employment is expected to grow 17% between 2008 and2018, outpacing the 10% growth projected for overall employment.9 Also, the average annualwage for all STEM occupations was $77,880 in May 2009, significantly above the U.S. averageof $43,460 for non-STEM occupations.9 In the United States demand for STEM workers isunmet. In the STEM occupations, job postings outnumbered unemployed people by 1.9 toone.9 These national workforce trends are also reflected in Hawaii, where projections indicatethat there will be 29,000 STEM-related jobs to be
educational process andprepares students for success entering a constantly-evolving professional landscape. The modelis designed to strengthen the relationship between our college and industry from four strategicdirections. • Providing faculty from engineering and technology disciplines as consultants to industry through a dedicate outreach program, the Center for Innovation in Technology and Engineering. • Generating continuous feedback through establishing relationships with industry professionals at the college and university level. • Encouraging student professional and technical development through a Career and Development Leadership Center. • Creating opportunities for students to gain valuable industry
includingteamwork, presentation skills, leadership skills, self-assurance, and breaking gender stereotypes.Women professionals in various science and engineering fields also met and discussed with theparticipants helping them visualize a future career in STEM and gain exposure to the variety ofoptions available to them. As a culminating project the girls who participated in the camp createdmulti-media video presentations with robotics, similar to the RoboPlay Video Competition, andmade presentations in front of parents and peers. The girls were given robotics kits to take backto their middle schools so they can start computing and robotics clubs of their own. Coaches andassistant coaches continue to mentor girls over the academic school year to facilitate
goals for its K-12 educator development. - Inspire and motivate students at all levels to pursue careers in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM). - Enhance K-12 educator knowledge in STEM cross-curricular space related fields. - Increase K-12 student knowledge in STEM education through age-appropriate space related activities. - Increase underrepresented and underserved participation. - Enhance career exploration by including space science professionals, NASA employees, and NASA-sponsored scientists, technical and engineering experts as role and career models.In 1990, the consortium imported a workshop from NASA Ames5 as the first offering of aprogram that became the “LiftOff
education ofengineers. ABET accreditation requires “an ability to communicate effectively” as a generallearning outcome for engineering students.7 Communication and other interpersonal skills canmake or break the career of an engineer. As J. Ben O’Neal notes, “most engineers are limited intheir career not by a lack of technical knowledge, but by an inability to reason verbally,communicate their ideas to others, and furnish leadership.” 8Perhaps the most important of communications skills for students is writing. Writing is theprocess through which students think on paper, explore ideas, raise questions, attempt solutions,uncover processes, build and defend arguments, brainstorm, introspect, and figure out what isgoing on. 9 Writing organizes
engaged in mentoring early career faculty and a recent research project uncovers the narratives of ex- emplar engineering faculty that have successfully transitioned to student-centered teaching strategies.Dr. Micah Lande, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campusDr. Matthew A Verleger, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical Univ., Daytona Beach Matthew Verleger is Assistant Professor in Freshman Engineering at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical Univer- sity. He has a BS in Computer Engineering, an MS in Agricultural & Biological Engineering, and a PhD in Engineering Education, all from Purdue University. Prior to joining the Embry-Riddle faculty, he spent two years as an Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at Utah State University
technical and moreimportantly non-technical audiences. The information contained in Appendix A is offered in the spirit of the ASME’s WhichPath Will You Take guidelines5 in order to assist prospective students, counselors, and industryrecruiters in better identifying ET as a path to a career in engineering. The information is genericand can be easily inserted in a flier with the university or departmental logos and colors. Againnote in particular the intentional omission of direct comparisons with other engineeringprograms. The message being: this is what ET is and what it does. ET has been around for many decades, it exists in well over 100 institutions of highereducation awarding 6,000+ degrees in 2012, and it has matured to spur
and development ,4-‐6 with the goal of introducing strategies toimprove education and retention in engineering7. The theory of identity-trajectory wasintroduced by McAlpine8 to explain the professional identity development through time ofgraduate students and emerging academics through intellectual, institutional, and networkstrands. The three strands work independently, and at times, weave together to explain identitydevelopment for those early in their academic career. Identity-trajectory provides a means tounderstand these early influences impact on one’s professional trajectory as they progressprofessionally.The intellectual strand focuses on learning within and the contributions of an individual to theirfield. Past experiences, agency
from. In 2010 the college started aninitiative to enhance the college’s efforts related to engineering leadership education. The resultof this effort is eli2. The mission of eli2 is to: Help students discover their burning desire and confidence to create, innovate, and collaborate to deliver world-changing solutions.To deliver world-changing solutions, the eli2 program believes the engineering leader needs toknow how to create, innovate, collaborate, and deliver. There are many skills within these keycompetency areas. The specific skills depend on the current career expectations of the students.By students eli2 means anyone looking to explore, study, and learn about engineering leadership
were allowed to choosetheir own topic, such as Green Building or Bottled Water versus Tap Water, so that they couldtake ownership of their work and peak their interest in STEM topics, courses, and majors. Theeffectiveness of this course is based on both its ability to meet its learning objectives and itsability to engage students in sustainability topics, projects, and career choices. Both classroomdiscussions and major assignments served as the basis for course assessment and revision of thiscourse.1.0 IntroductionThe focus of this paper is to assess the use of Sustainability Engineering within a Composition II Page 24.778.2course to increase
presentations. His publication record includes articles related to academic program development and assessment of academic programs. Dr. Latif was the Editor-in-Chief of the Journal of Engineering Technology.Mr. Aco Sikoski, Ivy Tech Community College Mr. Sikoski completed his Bachelors of Science in Electrical Engineering at the University of Kiril I Metodi in Skopje, Macedonia. He continued his education at Purdue University where he obtained his Masters of Science in Engineering. Intermittently, Mr. Sikoski has consulted for various institutions and organizations. In 1997, he started his career at Ivy Tech Community College where he has stayed until present. He served as a professor, program chair, dean, and the campus
engineering education by preparing students for their future careers. Thispaper demonstrates student development through the international experience of JuniorEnterprise and makes a case for the expansion of Junior Enterprise in the United States. Theconclusion of this paper includes the core benefits of involvement in Junior Enterprise forAmerican engineering students and recommendations for universities interested in starting their Page 20.25.2own Junior Enterprise.MethodThe primary research question of this study, How has Junior Enterprise impacted students?, wasconducted through the network of international Junior Enterprise students from Europe
postdoctoral research scholar at The Pennsylvania State University focusing on community informatics. She earned her PhD in computer science and applications from Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University (Virginia Tech), where she was a IBM Research Fellow and won an IBM Research Dissertation Fellowship. As a graduate student, her research and perspectives were featured in the New York Times and Computerworld. She is affiliated with the Coalition to Diversify Computing (CDC), based in Washington, DC. The CDC targets students and faculty with the focus of increasing the number of minorities successfully transition- ing into computing-based careers in academia, federal laboratories, and industry. As a CDC
interact during the researchexperience; and (3) to explore mentors’ experiences and attitudes after working withundergraduate research assistants. Anonymous, pre- and post-experience surveys were deployedto 118 research mentors, with >40% response rates. Analyzing the responses offers lessons forgraduate students, post-doctoral scholars, and other new mentors of undergraduate researchers.These surveys also highlight key factors in successful mentoring relationships, which areimportant in preparing undergraduates for success in graduate school and for careers in academiaand research.IntroductionMany researchers have explored the value to students of participating in undergraduate researchexperiences. Engaging in research allows undergraduates to
recruitment and retention. A SWE and ASEE Fellow, she is a frequent speaker on career opportunities and diversity in engineering. Page 24.1287.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Underrepresented Minority Students and Graduate SchoolAbstract.The technology demands on the U.S. workforce are increasing. Not only does the United Statesneed more engineers and computer scientists, but now more than ever, more of theseprofessionals are needed with a Master’s of a PhD degree. Some companies want at least half oftheir hires to have a graduate degree. The reasons for this demand are
the course would offer a diverse group of studentsan introduction to engineering as a possible career without the risk involved in taking the courseat the university or committing to an engineering major. The pilot course was taught by HHSteacher Jim Clark, whose credentials include BS EE, MS EE, a M Edu. and five yearsprofessional engineering experience at Motorola. Twenty HHS students completed the pilotcourse in a full academic year and each received three units of college credit. Of these twentystudents, five joined the UA COE in fall 2009 and to date, all five have graduated with anaverage GPA of 3.34. Of the 2009-10 cohort, 17 students remain in the COE today and most areon target for graduation within the next academic year. Details
, Andrea served as the director of the Equal Opportunity in Engineering (EOE) Program at The University of Texas at Austin for 11 years. Andrea joined UT in 2001 after six years in industry, where she had a successful career as a structural engineer for Kellogg Brown & Root and HDR Engineering, Inc. As EOE Director, Andrea led Cockrell School of Engineering efforts to recruit and retain ethnically underrepresented students as well as students with backgrounds or experiences that contributed to the overall diversity of the School. During her term, Andrea raised more than $3.7 million in private and public grants to support the EOE program and its mission. While EOE was under her direction, UT Austin ranked as
InstitutionsAbstractAlthough research has shown that involvement is a helpful predictor of students’ future success,underrepresented minorities (i.e., African Americans and Hispanics) face unique obstacles atpredominantly White institutions, which limit their engagement in educationally purposefulactivities. Survey data from a 2007 administration of the National Survey of Student Engagement(NSSE) were analyzed to measure African American and Hispanic students’ engagement ineducationally purposeful activities. Results from the present study found that student satisfactionin college is positively related to time spent preparing for class and frequency of interactionswith faculty members about careers. Furthermore, African American and Hispanic science,technology
engineering students and to leadership, policy, and change in STEM education. Primary research projects explore the preparation of graduate students for diverse careers and the development of reliable and valid engineering education assessment tools. She is a NSF Faculty Early Career (CAREER) and Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE) recipient.Dr. Suely M. Black, Norfolk State University Page 24.1087.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Snapshot of an Interdisciplinary Graduate Engineering
of wage and • Tools for working – information and communications proficiency gaps arising from a lack of education and technology (ICT) and information literacy; workforce readiness [1]: • Skills for living in the world – citizenship, life and “What people know and what they do with what they know career skills, and personal and social responsibility. has a major impact on their life chances. … Those with low ATC21S attempts to assess how the above skills (which are literacy skills are also more than twice as likely to bedeemed conceptual skills) are used in collaborative problem- unemployed. … improvements between younger and older978-1-4799-5233-5/14
literature suggesting that incoming college students2,3, as with the broader population1, are generally ill-‐informed about what engineering is and what engineers do beyond a very cursory understanding. Up to the point when they arrive on the college campus, many of the students have had limited opportunities to engage in engineering activity. Such engagements, when they are available, are typically offered extra-‐curricular or through outreach programs that aim to increase awareness and entice students into considering engineering as a future career option. To fulfill this objective, these programs tend to highlight the
interactivepedagogies such as inquiry based learning will provide students with meaningful experiencesthat showcase the importance and satisfaction of pursuing careers in STEM1.Research has shown that students as early as middle school develop an affinity or aversion toSTEM2,3. In one study, it was found that “life experiences before 8th grade may have impact onfuture career plans.” The researchers further conclude that in order “to attract students into thesciences and engineering, we should pay close attention to children’s early exposure to science atthe middle and even younger grades4.” Through this research, as well as the initiative set forthby the National Academies, one can conclude that a focus on the middle school years is crucialto help excite and
, more than five years had passed since their last collegecourses prior to enrolling at UND. Approximately half of the students (46.7%) had takendistance courses prior to enrolling at UND.Over half of the respondents indicated that increasing their earning potential was a primarymotivator for enrolling in an undergraduate engineering program. Over a third of therespondents indicated they felt an engineering degree would help them change careers or obtain apromotion in their current career. Table 11 shows the reported reasons for choosing a distance Page 24.298.7degree program for their engineering education. The flexibility of a distance