codes often concern technical matters such as onlyundertaking assignments in their areas of competence and professional matters such as acting asfaithful agents or trustees for their clients [1], with little regard to sociopolitical matters such asaddressing discriminations and inequalities in the field of engineering and beyond. Thisdisregard of sociopolitical matters might contribute to the large amount of discrimination in theforms of microaggressions facing engineering students of minoritized backgrounds. For example,a study found that different groups of racially minoritized students experience university campusdifferently in some ways [2]. The term “minoritized” is used to refer to the process of studentminoritization that suggests an
modalities for the transfer and co-creation ofknowledge, requirements, and possibilities for change in operational models and tapping into theboundary-breaking opportunities fostered by digital ways of teaching and learning. This studyaims to provide a future-proof pathway for the engineering education ecosystem to better equip itfor solving real-world problems with a multi-disciplinary approach to create new value forsociety. In the process, the study also sheds light on relevant new research avenues.1. IntroductionNeeds-driven innovation (also known as needs-based innovation) has been in use in the field ofBio-design for nearly 20 years now. [1]. One of these innovation techniques is framed through a'why or what and how' approach by Kate
student’s success are summarized and presented inthis paper.1. IntroductionDynamics is a fundamental course in the critical graduation path of almost every engineeringmajor. This is an important pre-requisite class as it lays the foundational concepts for otheradvanced courses such as Mechanical Vibrations, Feedback Controls and Intermediate SystemDynamics. In addition, At the University X, the failing (DFW) rate for Dynamics have beenaround 21% in average for the past 10 years (this translate in around 200 students failing peryear), reaching sometimes even 37% (Figure 1). High failure rates have adverse consequencessuch as delay in many students’ graduation timeline, dropping from engineering majors and thusreducing the university 4-year
engineering design courses. Creating the conditions however, to promote effectiveparticipation from all students in a team is certainly a challenge many instructors may face. Thischallenge often lies in the complexity of group dynamics and untaught skills that are necessary tofunction effectively on a team. Instructors may recognize the value of teaching process skills tostudents, however many may not feel qualified to teach these skills, or may even feeluncomfortable with coaching teams through their conflicts. Traditional mechanisms forpromoting effective team process skills include strategies such as assigning team roles,developing team contracts and organizing project timelines [1]. While these practices havetremendous value, they often focus on
by utilizing an Arduino to communicatewith created circuits. The assignments are designed to help the first-year students gain comfort incircuitry and programming.The instructional team has decided to use Tinkercad, which is a free online collection of softwaretools provided by Autodesk. Many people are only aware of Tinkercad as a 3D modelingprogramming, however in 2017 Autodesk merged its “123D Circuits” into Tinkercad [1] [2].This makes Tinkercad an ideal platform to use for circuitry and Arduino programming.The paper will further describe the design of the assignments, instructional team expectations fromthe students, the environment in which the students are using Tinkercad, as well as looking atexpected course outcomes using the
leadershipskills as learning outcomes. 1. IntroductionEmployability of graduates is a trivial question that has been focused upon in the field ofengineering education for decades. There exists a gap between the skills possessed by graduatesand the industrial requirement. This is often reflected in the form of lack of professional skillswhich involves teamwork and leadership skills [1].The future of the industrial sector, represented by Industry 4.0 has specific requirements liketeamwork and leadership (T&L) skills, self-regulated learning, and critical thinking, which needsto be satisfied by Education 4.0 [2]. T&L skills are highly rated and required skills in theindustry [3]. The competencies defined in Engineers Australia stage 1 [4], consist
subsequent careers is spatial ability.Underdeveloped spatial abilities can hinder student success in prerequisites such as calculus andphysics and further courses in the engineering curriculum [1]. In this paper, we review theliterature on working memory, spatial abilities, spatial anxiety, and the relationships betweenthem while focusing on the context of engineering problem-solving. Spatial ability is part of ahidden curriculum: it is relevant in engineering education but not explicitly and consistentlyacknowledged or explained by instructors. In the novice state, learners frequently call uponspatial thinking for problem-solving. With experience gained, learners become more familiarwith discipline problem types and rely less on their spatial
discussed.IntroductionAs engineering programs struggle with how to present senior design projects in the era of thepandemic, various lessons have been learned about virtual and previous large-scale events.While it is hoped that next year this event we will return to a face to face event some successfulelements of the virtual will be blended in to future events. As Laura Ingalls Wilder wrote in thelittle house on the prairie book series “There's no great loss without some small gain.[1]” Thiswork focuses on some of those gains.In this work in progress, we set out to explore the following research questions: Do faculty and industrial partners prefer an in-person, or an online, event? Are live presentations, or pre-recorded presentations, preferred by
Award by the American Society for Engineering Education. Dr. Menekse also received three Seed-for-Success Awards (in 2017, 2018, and 2019) from Purdue University’s Excellence in Re- search Awards programs in recognition of obtaining three external grants of $1 million or more during each year. His research has been generously funded by grants from the Institute of Education Sciences (IES), Purdue Research Foundation (PRF), and National Science Foundation (NSF). American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Work in Progress: STEM Students’ Experiences with Educational Technology ToolsAbstractThere has been an increased use of
exponential growth in computing power,machine intelligence and data revolution, quantum technologies and materials, there areenormous opportunities to continue advancing fundamental EM theories towards next-generation technology developments and applications.On the other hand, electromagnetics course is considered to be one of the most difficult andheavy mathematics involved courses. Students lacking pre-knowledge of mathematics andphysics complain about not able to follow the course [1]. Traditionally in many engineeringcurricula, the EM course is taught in a standard format using notes and mathematical derivationof equations. As a result, many students find the course difficult and less attractive due to itshighly mathematical and relatively
develop general members’ teamwork skills.Introduction Teamwork is regarded as one of the most important soft skills by both engineeringgraduates and their employers (1-4). A review of studies surveying engineers across engineeringdisciplines and experience levels found that there are four distinct tiers of importance;communication and teamwork were in the tier with highest importance, while math, science, andengineering knowledge were in the tier second from the bottom (5). Professionals withteamwork skills are desirable because high-performing teams have the potential to becomegreater than the sum of their members, especially when tackling interdisciplinary challenges (2).However, teamwork does not receive adequate emphasis for such an
students that take a position in an environmental, safety, andoccupational health department within a plant. The aim of this work is to share the instructionalapproach on safety and environmental compliance in our capstone course to obtain feedbackfrom other design education experts to improve our instruction.The need for enhanced process safety instruction in chemical engineering curricula has beenrecognized for a while in our discipline [1], [2], [3]. A greater awareness of this need resultedfrom the T2 Laboratories runaway reaction and explosion that occurred in Jacksonville, Floridain 2007 [4]. This event served as an impetus for ABET to specifically include process safety as arequired instructional component in chemical engineering curricula
havebeen documented to negatively affect the progress of women faculty in engineering and otherSTEM areas. This is presented with an iterative identification of elements through differentstages of the academic career, layered with variables that are measurable, and potentialapproaches for future modeling given existing research and the characteristics of the ADVANCEprogram. The challenges of modeling such a complex system are discussed, together withpotential alternatives as a first modeling approach using existing data from different sources.IntroductionFor the advancement of the engineering discipline in the U.S., it is paramount to ensure fairparticipation of all members of its diverse society [1]; promoting women representation at thefaculty
population. Data wasacquired from individuals participating in National Federation of the Blind (NFB) Conventionsacross the United States as well as NFB sponsored summer engineering programs. The paperreports on a National Science Foundation funded effort to garner initial research findings on theapplication of the TMCT. It reports on initial findings of the instrument’s validity and reliability,as well as the development of the instrument over the first three years of this project.IntroductionSpatial ability can be defined as the cognitive ability to construct, re-orient, transform, andreconstruct mental images [1]. Spatial skills are vital in a variety of fields including engineering,chemistry, biology, physics, architecture, astronomy, and many
limited to, tasks such as analysis, synthesis, and evaluation, compared topassive listening to a lecture [1], [2].A review of the literature shows that there are varying interpretations of the term “hands-onlearning.” A simple definition is learning by doing [3]. However, according to [4], hands-onlearning should have some form of inquiry process involved, a structured list of activities,and experimentation of manipulation of the artifact is required. The present study used thisoperational definition of hands-on learning in selecting studies for the meta-analysis.Hands-on learning techniques have been shown to increase students’ learning in theclassroom [5]. While many studies, over the past 20 years, have studied the effect of hands-on learning
) and Stanford Technology Ventures Program.Dr. Brian David Gockley, Bucknell University American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 WIP: The Faculty Development CanvasIntroductionThis work-in-progress introduces a tool called the Faculty Development Canvas (FDC), a one pagegraphical framework for helping faculty think holistically about their own growth and development. Webegin with a description and rationale for the layout followed by exercises that can be incorporated intoexisting faculty development programs. The paper concludes with preliminary results from a facultysurvey.The Faculty Development CanvasThe FDC, shown in Figure 1, was created using
instructor’sfeedback on the quality of their writing, not just the work’s technical content.1. IntroductionEngineering professions require a substantial amount of writing, whether in industry oracademia. Educators have done a significant amount of research on how to better prepareengineering students for the kind and amount of writing demanded by professional practice [1-4].In fact, the importance and value of effective writing communication skills for engineers hasbeen emphasized by both the National Academy of Engineering [5] and ABET [6].Among the benefits of teaching effective writing in engineering courses are allowing the studentsto develop and use critical thinking and assessing students’ level of understanding of the subjectmatter. Moreover, the
requirements [1], [2]. Capstone or end-of-degreedesign courses are now prolific in engineering programs across disciplines as a means ofmeeting these standards, and there is a growing body of literature detailing practices incapstone design teaching (e.g. [3]), and models of industry partnership (e.g. [4]). Beyondaccreditation requirements, teaching design through a problem-based approach contributespositively to student motivation [5]. Any design teaching in this way is challenging, but civilengineering, in particular, poses distinct challenges to developing integrated capstone designcoursework. Integrated capstone design brings together the many subdisciplines (e.g.structural, environmental, geotechnical, etc) of civil engineering in the context of
. However, to continue to harness the nation'sgreat technological potential, universities must seek to better prepare undergraduates foraddressing complex, contemporary challenges in both innovative and transdisciplinary ways. Tobest meet society’s needs, undergraduates should embrace the ability to build upon new ideas,processes, and ways of seeing things that add value to the world in a manner that emphasizessocial and personal responsibility across fields of study. As the National Academy ofEngineering [1] states, “innovative thinking should be an expectation of the universitycommunity and all students should be exposed to it early” (p. 6). Accordingly, multiple strategieshave been enacted to attempt to engage students in innovation-focused
and hands-on lab instruction asmany programs were forced to abruptly transition to distance learning. Project-based designintegration using affordable engineering kits presents a practical solution to many of the mostpressing issues facing engineering educators as they continue to refine their approach to coursecontent delivery.Engineering attritionRecent studies have shown that approximately 50% of students who begin their education inengineering programs do not graduate from those programs, and roughly 85% of the studentswho choose to discontinue their engineering education do so within the first two years [1]. Thisproblem is especially prevalent in smaller universities, which demonstrate lower retention overalland often lack the faculty
, service, and career advancement) and provideholistic faculty support in areas such as time management, work-life topics, and well-being [1].From the context of the CTL, the intentional alignment of programs, in which the relationshipsbetween goals and activities of different faculty development programs are considered, helps toidentify strategic approaches to advancing the CTL’s goals. At the same time, from the contextof faculty members, participating in exercises that encourage the consideration of an issue fromboth big picture and granular perspectives and the connections between the factors that impactthe issue can help foster reflection and make visible the role of faculty members in the issue.The objectives of this paper are to 1) present a
Education, 2021 Work in Progress: Wrappers vs. ExpertsIntroductionEighty-one students enrolled in a required, third-year reaction engineering course were thesubjects for this investigation. The author was the instructor for that course and had taught itmore than twenty-five times before this offering. During that span, four substantial pedagogicalchanges occurred. After those changes the effect of completing homework upon an averagestudent’s course score improved by a factor of 2.5 [1].One of those pedagogical changes incorporated homework wrappers into assigned homeworkproblems. Briefly, the homework wrappers asked the students to reflect upon their approach tosolving the problem and their execution of the solution and then
can develop work experiences that fosterincreased student graduation and entry into STEM career pathways. This project, which iscurrently in its first year, seeks to examine how a curriculum that integrates cross-sectorpartnerships to provide work experiences can enhance STEM learning and retention. Usingmixed methods and grounded theory, the project will expand knowledge about: (1) the impact ofcross-sector partnerships that support work-focused experiential teaching and learning; (2)systematic ways to maintain and better use cross-sector partnerships; and (3) the degree to whicha model of work-focused learning experiences can be adopted at other two-year HSIs and byother STEM fields. Baseline data about Hispanic serving identity at the
upon the concepts introduced in earlier courses utilizing tools such as the FBD(while ideally enhancing their engineering judgment simultaneously) until their Capstone course,in which the tools, concepts, knowledge and judgment are all employed in the service of solvingan open-ended problem. Gainsburg 1 presents engineering judgment as the integration of theoryand practicality, which implies that incorporating good engineering judgment requires a strongfoundational understanding of the theory, significant practical experience and being able toconnect the two in order to address an engineering problem. From an instructor’s perspective, itcan be challenging to present a new topic to students, whether in a Statics class or in Capstone,where there
extend the knowledge developed in specific courses in the core curriculum to the more complex, authentic problems and projects they face as professionals. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Work-in-Progress: Computer Simulations to Deliver Inquiry-Based Laboratory Activities in MechanicsIntroductionAlthough students can often use algorithmic substitution and pattern matching to solvemechanics problems, many do not understand the underlying principles [1], [2]. It is critical thatstudents develop a strong conceptual understanding of mechanics to transfer this knowledge tonew types of problems and for follow-on courses [3], [4]. To help
vision for Engineering in the 21stcentury: “Continuation of life on the planet, making our world more sustainable, secure, healthy,and joyful” [1]. To prepare engineering graduates who possess not only strong technical skillsbut also the global awareness and social skills necessary to tackle the challenges, the GrandChallenges Scholars Program (GCSP) was proposed and established by three engineering Deansin the U.S. and endorsed by the NAE as an educational supplement to any engineering programboth within the U.S. and internationally. To date, over 90 institutions have established their ownGCSP. They all aim to prepare graduates who have achieved the following five competenciesidentified by NAE GCSP [2]: 1. Talent Competency: mentored
in appreciation of course relevance of both theengineering course and composition course. This project is significant as the results from thisstudy will be used to better design and link interdisciplinary curriculum and leverage topics inand between all cohorted classes.IntroductionThe importance of writing and communication skills to the academic and professional pursuits offuture engineers is well established. ABET lists an “ability to communicate with a range ofaudiences” as a student outcome for the accreditation of undergraduate engineering programs[1].Writing specialists have long sought to identify and develop “reliable ways” of helping studentsprepare for the writing situations they will likely encounter as engineers [2, p. 318]. Yet
into an REU Site in the U.S. SouthIntroductionParticipating in a research experience for undergraduates (REU) site provides opportunities forstudents to develop their research and technical skills, raise their awareness of graduate studies[1], and understand the social context of research [2]. In support of this mission, our REU site atThe University of Alabama (Sensors, Systems and Signal Processing Supporting SpeechPathology) is exploring research at the intersection of engineering and communicative disorders.Our site has a focused theme of developing technology to support clinical practice in the field ofcommunication sciences and disorders; which is an applied behavioral science that includesscreening, assessment, treatment, and technology
associates to be successful researchers and professionals. At times,faculty members may not be trained to be effective mentors and do not have a toolkit of mentoringskills to rely on when inevitable mentoring challenges occur. While there is significant evidencepointing to the value of promoting strong mentorship for research students, there are very fewmentors who receive effective mentor training and mentors often rely solely on their pastexperiences and on observations of other mentors to build their own mentoring styles [1-2].Therefore, it is vital to provide appropriate training for faculty mentors in effective mentoring sothat they can aid their students to be as successful as possible during their formal studies andthroughout their research
deductive approach (see Figure 1), faculty deliver fundamentals to students,and students are expected to learn applications and develop interpersonal and intrapersonal skillsin the industry. In the integrated approach (Fig. 1), pair-by-pair interactions are introduced:faculty are expected to learn about applications from interactions with industry, students areexpected to learn fundamentals from interactions with faculty, and students acquire interpersonaland intrapersonal skills through interactions with industry. These pair-by-pair interactions haveproven to be partially effective ways of knowledge transfer and skill development, but they lackcoherent and synthetic integration.To enrich the integrated approach, we engaged one more step, bringing