asdeveloping study and learning strategies.Figure 1 represents a screen capture of a playback of a typical eSI session conducted by the SIleader and having one student as participant. As observed in the figure, the SI leader used awhiteboard, available in CentraOne, with the student to discuss a given problem. Such aninteractive process was achieved through live voice and data sharing between the two parties. Ifdesired, control may be given to the student(s) attending to allow them to actively participate inproblem solution. Figure 1: Screen Capture of a CentraOne SessionThe kinds of questions and problems facing the IADE students were similar to those discussedearlier in the on-campus section, except that the IADE students
courses. The authors also recognize that their opinion is notthe only opinion on this subject—there are almost as many opinions as there are structural Page 9.1124.1engineering educators, and each opinion has a strong and loyal following. Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering EducationA New or Old QuestionThe question of what should be taught in a structural analysis course for engineers was likelyfirst asked in the 1930’s shortly after Hardy Cross developed moment distribution for theanalysis of frames
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering Education”students watch the video as a large group. They were then broken into small groups to discussseveral of the people in the video, and then reported back to the entire class their conclusions.The ethics presentation and discussion led by Dr. Jordan was based on two A.S.E.E. papers hehas written3,4. The cases presented all actually happened. Dr. Jordan observed these realsituations while working as an engineer for a medium sized steel company in the 1980's. Thecases were presented as ethical or moral dilemmas. The students had to decide upon their ownresponses before the professor presented what decision was made by the person involved.Time and Life ManagementThe first three habits from
ExplorationProgram in the 90’s, the School of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering (AME) decided toupdate and modernize its AE course sequence, adding new thrust areas in EE and CS to its awardwinning and ABET accredited conventional AE program.Over the last two years, AME has developed a challenging and exciting modern AE curriculumthat incorporates the growing field of intelligent systems as a major aspect into the mix ofcourses and increases the space-engineering component while preserving a strong aeronauticsprogram. Specifically, the digital aspects of AE technology were added: an embedded real timesystems experience and an expanded controls sequence. The standard modern physics coursewas replaced by our own course in astrodynamics and space science
problem. 2. Document a PLC program for archival purposes. 3. Document project results in an appropriate manner. 4. Wire sinking and sourcing sensors and power supplies to a PLC. 5. Build a proof-of-concept model for a sensor validation experiment.Students used self-assessment to determine the success of the course in enabling them to achievethe course outcomes, with a 0 indicating no mastery and 10 very proficient. A typical courseassessment for the PLC portion of the course is shown in Figure 6 below. IN S T R U C T O R PLC O UTCO M ES ASSESSM ENT E E 2 8 5 S P R IN G 2 0 0 3 J O
Session 1432 DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY EMPHASIS AT WESTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY Jian Peng and Mark E. Cambron Department of Engineering Western Kentucky University Bowling Green, KY 42101AbstractThe Department of Engineering at Western Kentucky University (WKU) has been given the rareopportunity to develop an entirely new engineering program. Western’s challenge is to create aunique undergraduate curriculum focused on the needs of current and future industrial partners.In the 1990’s, a move towards a
Session 3120[4] E. Eckhoff, V. Eller, S. Watkins, and R. Hall, “Interactive virtual laboratory for experience with a smart bridge test,” Proceedings of the 2002 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 16-19, 2002, Montreal, CA.[5] M. Uskova, M. Bunch, D. Ludy, and V. Uskov, “Developing online educational materials for computer applications undergraduate courses,” Proceedings of the 31st ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Oct. 10-13, 2001, Reno, NV.[6] A. Striegel, “Distance education and its impact on computer engineering laboratories,” Proceedings of the 31st ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Oct. 10-13, 2001, Reno, NV.[7] C. Nippert, “Evaluating student performance in online laboratories,” Proceedings of
and guidance of the Materials Concept Inventory, as well as all engineering conceptinventories, by Professor Don Evans, head of the Center for Research on Science, Math,Engineering and Technology (CRESMET) at ASU.REFERENCES[1] Evans, D.L., Gray, D., Krause, S., Martin, J., Midkiff, C., Notaros, B.M., Pavelich, M., Rancour, D., Reed-Rhoads, T., Steif, P., Streveler, R., and Wage, K., (2003). “Progress on concept inventory assessment tools.” Frontiers in Education Conference Proceedings, T4G – 1-9.[2] Hestenes, D., Wells, Malcolm, Swackhamer, and Gregg (1992). “Force concept inventory.” The Physics Teacher, 30(3): 141-151.[3] Hestenes, D., Wells, and Malcolm (1992). “A mechanics baseline test.” The Physics Teacher, 30
. The course is unique in that it that has no prerequisitesother than junior class standing in a technical major. Assessment of the students’ knowledge andcompetence levels shows that undergraduates can indeed learn about MEMS, regardless of theirmajor field of study.REFERENCES1. Systems Planning Corporation, “MicroElectroMechanical Systems (MEMS), An SPC Market Study,” January, Page 9.204.8 1999. Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference &Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering Education2. S. R. Lewis, “A Look toward the Future of MEMS
differently approaches for taking the time and distance measurements. Data wasrecorded in a laptop computer as the measurements were taken.As each team finished taking their measurements, they returned to the classroom and begananalyzing their data. As homework for the next class period, they were asked to calculate thecar's velocity, make a plot of velocity vs. distance, and describe in detail all significant featuresof the plot. Shown below in Figure 1 is a plot of all the student data, followed by a summary inTable 1 of the reported velocities and conclusions from the four student teams.Figure 1. Velocity data from student teams 1.2 1 0.8 Velocity (ft/s
Session 1725 A Capstone Design Approach in Civil Engineering Harriet S. Cornachione, Michael A. Cornachione, and Valerie. J. Vance Oregon Institute of TechnologyAbstract Assessing student outcomes from the civil engineering program at Oregon Institute ofTechnology (OIT) identified several areas of concern. Ineffective team skills, limitedmulti-disciplinary design experience and inadequate integration of technicalcommunications with the engineering curriculum were specifically targeted forimprovement. To strengthen student outcomes in these areas, technical communicationsfaculty and civil engineering faculty at OIT developed
whoseinterconnected icons control how the project plays back (see Figure 1). Some icons cause theproject to branch to different areas depending on user choices. Users can incorporate text,graphics, sound, animation and video from a number of complementary programs. With thesecapabilities, Authorware 6 was the primary software architecture and mechanism behindToolTRAIN©. Page 9.1311.2 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering Education Figure 1. Interconnected icon control in Authorware’s
Session 2793 WE@UT – A Residential Recruitment Program for Women in Engineering Tricia S. Berry The University of Texas at AustinAbstractThe Women in Engineering at The University of Texas (WE@UT) program, a two-day in-depthresidential program, is designed to increase participant knowledge and understanding ofengineering and technology through hands-on, technology-based team projects so well informedand solid educational and career decisions are made. The objectives of this program are (1) toencourage young women to explore engineering as a career
. WVU Team Queretaro Queretaro Team Local I n d u s t r y Cluster Course Ind. Project 4 Ind. Project 1 Ind. Project 2 Ind. Project 3 Ind. Project 5
developed for both the shifting and fuelreforming processes based on the partial pressure of products and reactants as described in Jonesand Dugan2. ( f CH4( To3 ) + f H2O( To3 ) ) −( f CO( To3 ) + 3⋅ f H2( To3 ) ) R u⋅ To3 Kp R e (1) ( f CO( To3 ) + f H2O( To3 ) ) −( f CO2( To3 ) + f H2( To3 ) ) R u⋅ To3 Kp S e (2)In
Session 2330 Predicting the Academic Engagement of Women and Students at Historically Black Universities: A Social Cognitive Approach Robert W. Lent, Janet A. Schmidt, & Linda C. Schmidt, University of Maryland, College Park/Clay S. Gloster, Howard University/ Gregory Wilkins, Morgan State UniversityAbstractWe examined the utility of social cognitive career theory (SCCT) in predicting theacademic persistence goals of (a) women versus men and of (b) students at historicallyBlack versus predominantly White universities. Participants (487 students enrolled inintroductory engineering courses at three universities
nation'seconomic growth and vitality from all cross-sections of the society and in particular, fromamong the women and minorities1 . NOAA summer camp is a two-week program held atUMES to initiate early intervention at middle school level for a group of students tobroaden their perspective with regard to career choices. The program is directed byPhysics and Engineering faculty at UMES and is designed to provide hand s-on projectbased learning experience to twenty middle school students from Accomack Countyschools in the lower eastern shore region of the Delmarva Peninsula every year.Accomack County is in an economically depressed area with a significant minoritypopulation. The students for the summer camp are recruited with the help of schooladministration
. 3, 1999, pp. 311-317.7. Miller, R. L., and B. M. Olds, “A Model Curriculum for a Capstone Course in Multidisciplinary Page 8.201.7 “Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2003, American Society for Engineering Education”Engineering Design,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 83, no. 4, 1994, pp. 311- 316.8. Phillips, J. R. and A. Bright, “The Harvey Mudd Engineering Clinic: Past, Present, and Future,”Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 88, no. 2, 1999, pp 189-195.9. Schaub, D. A., S. M. Legg, S. A. Svoronos, B. L
Session 2660 CAPACITY BUILDING – ENGINEERS FOR DEVELOPING COUNTRIES Russel C. Jones, Ph.D., P.E. World Expertise LLC and Bethany S. Oberst, Ph.D. James Madison UniversityAbstractThe global persistence of warfare, aggression, oppression and political unrest testify to thegrowing vulnerability and impatience of those who live in conditions of extreme poverty.A larger injection of aid is needed to help stabilize the poorest countries: projects thatpromise only
, American Society for Engineering EducationThe stock Dragonfly model (left) constructed from the factory kit and the aircraft as redesigned(note wing modification) by an MIT student for competition.DBF Project InceptionUnified Engineering is a required multi-disciplinary course for MIT Aero-Astro students enrolledin their second year. First developed and implemented in the mid-1970’s 1,2, Unified Engineeringis a two-semester course sequence, 24 credit hours per semester, that covers Materials andStructures, Dynamics, Signals & Systems, Fluid Dynamics, and Thermodynamics & Propulsion ina fast-paced curricular schedule that includes lectures, recitations, laboratories, and objective teststaught in an intensive 5 day/week schedule. Unified
Session 2455 Industry Supported Dual-Master’s Degree Program Frederick S. Brown, Mel I. Mendelson Loyola Marymount University, College of Science & Engineering Los Angeles, CA 90045Abstract:In the fall 2003, Loyola Marymount University (LMU) will initiate a new, dual-degreeSystems Engineering Leadership Program (SELP) to fulfill the graduate educational needs ofindustry and government in Southern California. The SELP is based on the collaborativedevelopment of an integrated curriculum among LMU’s college of engineering, business andlocal industry. It is
,” TheLeading Edge 13, no. 11 (1994): 1123-1127.3. C.J. Dyson and N.C. Winter, “SPE 23162: Building Multidisciplinary Business Teams,” (paper presented at the1991 Society of Petroleum Engineers Offshore Europe Conference, Aberdeen, Scotland, September 3-6 1991).4. Robert M. Sneider, "Multidisciplinary Teams: How and Why They Make You Money," (Tulsa, Oklahoma:AAPG Continuing Education Course Notes Series 37, American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 1996).5. Richard A. Schmuck and Patricia A. Schmuck, Group Processes in the Classroom (Boston: McGraw Hill,1997).6. B.M. Olds, M.J. Pavelich, and F.R. Yeatts, "Teaching the design process to freshmen and sophomores," Journalof Engineering Education (1990): 554-559.7. Robert S. Thompson, “Reliability
Session 2315 ASCE’s Raise the Bar Initiative: Accreditation-Related Barriers and Critical Issues Ernest T. Smerdon, P.E., Richard O. Anderson, P.E. and Jeffrey S. Russell, P.E. Dean Emeritus, University of Arizona, Tucson, 85721/Principal Engineer, SOMAT Engineering, Inc., Taylor, MI 48180/Chair, Construction Engineering and Management, University of Wisconsin-Madison, WI 53706IntroductionThe conditions and broad requirements of engineering practice are rapidly changing – and theywill change even more in the future. Moreover, engineering education is also changing, perhapsmore
internship(s)? 18. How beneficial to, or complementary with, your internship is (are) your classes? 19. How much value do you place on the courses you took which were not directly related to your internship position? 20. How much value do you place on the courses you took which were directly related to your internship position?Table 2. Questions #15 through 20 from the surveyThe results from these questions were very interesting and seem to indicate the students who weresurveyed felt their course work and their internships were mutually beneficial. This agrees withthe report by Williamson and Grankowski, 1996, where they concluded that through internships“a student’s perceptions of their practical abilities
performed theseexperiments), we are forever grateful. Page 8.478.8REFERENCES:1. J. S. Miller and A. J. Epstein, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 109, 3850 (1987).2. J. M. Williams et al., Acc. Chem. Res., 18, 261 (1985).3. G. Allinson et al., J. Mat. Sci.: Mat’ls in Electr., 5, 67 (1994).4. D. Gatteschi, Adv. Mat., 6, 635 (1994).5. J. S. Miller and A. J. Epstein, ed. "Proceedings of the Conference on Molecule-Based Magnets", Molec. Cryst., Liq. Cryst., 271-274 (1995).6. A. Lukasiewicz, et al., Mat. Lett., 14, 127 (1992).8. J. V. Masi and W. Thibault, New, High Frequency Transformer Topologies, in Proc. of the EMCWA, IEEE Press, N.J., 1995, pp 157-162.9. J. S
”, Proceedings of 2000 ASEEAnnual Conference, Session 2344, June 18-21, 2000.2. Denton, D.D., “Engineering Education for the 21St Century: Challenges and Opportunities”, J. of EngineeringEducation, January 1998, pp. 19-22.3. Hall W.L. and Z.J. Cendes – Introducing real world design problems into undergraduate electromagneticcurriculum, IEEE Trans. on Educ., pp. 279-284, vol. 36, no. 2, 1993.4. DeLyser R.R., Wilson J.C. and R.W. Quine, “A Novel Multidisciplinary Course: Measurment and AutomatedData Acquisition”, Proceedings 29th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conf., San Juan, Puerto Rico, 1999, pp.12d3-1-12d3-6.5. Waver J.M. and S. Das, “Overhaul of an Undergraduate Mechanical Measurements Laboratory”, Proceedings 29thASEE/IEEE in Frontiers in
Introducing a Mechatronic Platform to Freshman Mechanical Engineering StudentsVojislav Gajic, Donald Heer, Tom Thompson, Roger Traylor, Geoffrey Frost, Terri S. Fiez Oregon State UniversityAbstract: The purpose of this paper is to introduce a Mechatronic platform that was recentlydeveloped to enhance Mechanical Engineering curriculum. This new platform provides hands-onexperience, encourages innovation, and presents the means for a more holistic education ofengineering graduates.IntroductionIn today’s competitive market, there is a critical need for skilled engineering graduates.Historically, students have a good theoretical background after graduation; however, they lackpractical, hands-on skills, as well as
: New K-Map selected Highlight Cells Terms entered Prompt with message No Term correct? Yes Add term/s to final equation No Done
opportunities associated with three categories – technology, logistics, andstudent behavior. In subsequent papers the authors will discuss each of the three issues indetail, in the context of some of the research questions that were outlined in this paper. References1. Evans, E., and Murray, S., 1998, “A Technology Assessment Survey for Web-Based Higher Education Programs,” 1998 American Society for Engineering Education Conference, Seattle, WA, June 1998.2. Evans, R.; Murray, S.; Daily, M.; and Hall, R., January 2000, “Effectiveness of an Internet-Based Graduate Engineering Management Course,” Journal of Engineering Education.3. Gosmire, D., and J. Vondruska, 2001, “Distance Teaching and Learning
8 7 SCORE 6 5 IN S T R U C T O R 4 3 STUDENT 2 TARGET 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 OUTCO M E # Figure 5: Course Outcomes AssessmentThis type of course outcome assessment is used for every