chance to reflect on their improvements and progressand realize where designs might fail. This is a critical piece in the engineering self-efficacy development[13]. Second, it allowed the professor the opportunity to understand which students required moreindividual support and design coaching in the classroom. Those that were independently problem solvingand constructing could be left to their own devices. Those that were stuck were offered more guidance andprompting to help move the activity along. If the activity were done in teams, those that struggled to getstarted might not get the opportunity to independently construct limited fidelity prototypes due to the natureof team dynamics and would miss this critical part of the design realization
workshop but rather a year-long teacherprofessional development program that provides teachers with 100 contact hours to acquire andapply new knowledge and reflect on their teaching practices. Several studies emphasizecontinuous PD that occurs periodically throughout the school year to best support teachers asthey make adjustments to their lessons and teaching practices. [17,18,19,20]. In addition to PDduration, teachers in AMP! learn how to shift their current lessons to include more effectivestrategies such as inquiry-based and team based lessons [21,22]. Inquiry based teaching can bedescribed as an open communication between teachers and students to freely ask questions topromote conceptual understanding and puts an emphasis on lesson
characteristicsof engineers in the future. Writing in the year of 2020, when engineering education yet againfaces looming paradigm shift driven in part by a global pandemic and major powers’ adjustmentin attitudes and strategies to globalization, we attempt to reassess visions of “engineers for thefuture,” as reflected through policy discourses in the United States and China, two major playersin global engineering education. For this purpose, we present a careful reading of recent policydocuments published by the US National Academy of Engineering (NAE) and the ChineseMinistry of Education (MoE).The NAE (2018) report Understanding the Educational and Career Pathways of Engineersresulted from a study commissioned by the Academy to “understand
resumes on file, especially from successful internsor contractors who could just as easily by-pass the online job advertising recruitment process. Also, it shouldbe noted that job description may not provide a complete reflection of the type of work an engineer does onthe job. The nature of the work conducted by engineers evolves as time and projects go on, meaning theactual activities of a practicing engineering may be very different from those that were written into the jobadvertisement. In addition, the rate of occurrence of activities within a job posting is unlikely to reflect theproportion of time spent on each activity by the engineer. While acknowledging these limitations, the researchteam does not claim that the findings of this paper
groups (SA4)When students reflected on what they needed from their study groups, some trends were similarto those of lab groups. For example, 21.3% of students prioritized individual accountability intraditional learning while only 14.1% did so in remote learning. This downward trend is similarto what students said about their lab groups. With regard to individual accountability, whilestudents made more frequent comments about interpersonal and social skills in remote learningwith regard to their lab groups, the increase in these types of comments in their study groups wasmuch larger. Students in remote learning mentioned interpersonal and social skills with respectto their peer groups at over twice the frequency (22.7%) of students in
-Centred Designing Task composed of two sections: The first was for thestudents to compare the structural development of either district, and reflect and make theconnection of how many of the human needs (of the Matrix of Human Needs of Satisfiers)are already considered in each plan, and therefore see how that is reflected in the quality-of-life reports of the residents of either district.The second section was to design a Human-Centred Design for the people of Shatila, with thepurpose and intention of positively impacting their quality of life in both the short and longrun. They were encouraged to include as many of the human needs (of the Matrix of BasicHuman Needs and Satisfiers) that the people of Shatila ought to have currently missing
and Physiology I 25 Heart rate Measurement CEGR 324 Structural Analysis and Lab (Sec 1) 9 Stresses and Strains CEGR 324 Structural Analysis and Lab (Sec 2) 6 Stresses and Strains IEGR 305 Engineering Thermodynamics (Sec 1) 10 Specific Heat Capacity IEGR 305 Engineering Thermodynamics (Sec 2) 23 Specific Heat Capacity PHYS 206 University Physics II 23 Sound/Reflection and Refraction of Light TRSS 414 Traffic Engineering 30 SoundMSLQ AnalysisThe Motivated Strategies for
codeswere refined to reflect observed patterns in the career possibility discussions in the data.Conceptually similar codes were grouped into a set of categories (Academia, Industry, andOther). Interview questions that probed relative importance or interest in specific career pathswere not asked; as such, the coded mentions of a career path were considered to represent astudent’s awareness of a career possibility. Additionally, the research questions and analyticapproach presented aimed to explore what students perceived as possible rather than plausible ormost interesting.A code was counted if it was mentioned at least once by a participant. Because the intensity ofthe students’ awareness or interest was not the focus of this study, multiple
conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of theauthor(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] E. P. Cunningham, “A typology of mathematical moments in kindergarten classrooms,” Ph.D. dissertation, Graduate College, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE, 2018.[2] E. R. Banilower, P. S. Smith, K. A. Malzahn, C. L. Plumley, E. M. Gordon, and M. L. Hayes, Report of the 2018 NSSME+. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research, Inc., 2018.[3] C. N. Lippard, M. H. Lamm, K. M. Tank,and J. Y. Choi, “Pre-engineering thinking and engineering habits of mind in preschool classroom,” Early Childhood Education Journal, vol. 47, pp. 187-198, 2019.[4] B. L. Dorie, T. R. Jones, M. C
respect. The significance of faculty being available to meet may reflect the significantdemands that especially minoritized women face in managing multiple priorities on their time.One ethnographic study recounts how Inez, a minoritized multiethnic female student, felt hinderedacademically by her professors’ lack of availability outside of office hours [11]. Anotherminoritized female student, Kitatoi, expressed her frustration with attempting to receive help fromher instructors outside of office hours [39]. As a single mother, Kitatoi had competing prioritiesand a more flexible instructor could have better assisted her learning alongside her continued focuson other important obligations. Cole [41] also found that minoritized students believe
ofengineering, and a time for students to reflect upon and decide the majors and specialties theywill pursue thereon (Ngambeki, 2009). It is also a time when students’ beliefs of engineering andits education are reinforced (Hutchison et al., 2006). The content and experiences offered aspart of these courses present an opportunity to support students in developing their beliefs andattitudes towards engineering. We teach students that engineers design, apply math andscience to solve problems, program, make decisions, have different areas of specialty, but oftenmiss or convey only implicitly that engineering at its core is a human endeavor, one that ispracticed for people, with people, and as people (Fila et al., 2014). To engineer better meansengineering
between higher educationinstitutions and governments in securing their repatriation. Back in their home countries, manyinternational students faced issues with unstable internet access, limited space to work and studyin their own homes, and time zone differences which made it difficult to adapt to and learn in theremote setting. These difficulties were compounded for Asian international students by a rise inanti-Asian sentiment and hate crimes in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. Significantincreases in Sinophobic slurs on Twitter, social media, message boards, and other platforms ofAmerican culture reflected a shift toward blaming the Chinese for the COVID-19 pandemic andamplified negative bias against both international and U.S. Asian students
deepening myunderstanding and empathy with my participants’ experiences.With this mentioned, I am aware that my subjectivities as someone within the community that Iam researching could present a quality threat to the findings of this research. To mitigate thisthreat, I engaged in memoing processes to help me to reflect upon all of the ways in which mysubjectivities could influence the findings. Additionally, I engaged in a “critical friends” protocolwith trusted mentors and colleagues to ensure that my framework was appropriate, my analysismethods were sound, and that my findings were representative of what the data present [33].Results & DiscussionSTEM IdeologyA recurring theme among all four participants was the reflection upon and
other. This is reality.This knowledge gained in this project pretty much stays within this project and does not help in away to predict the next similar project except providing clues and interest in similar tasks. This iswhere AI will make a difference as described in the next section.AI’s Approach for Time Estimation PredictionThe data for this project from Table 1 will be entered in the AI database as a flat-file – alltasks(te) and the project (Te) total actual units of time. For AI large amount of such project, datais key for analysis and more accurate output. For this research as noted in earlier sections, a largeAI database with similar data was created with over six hundred projects to reflect real-worlddata for this research and was
instruction to effectively fit into a delivery format of 75 minutes, twice a week.The goal of the team was to ensure that the students in the online section had the sameexperience and success as the students in the traditional face to face section. Several assessmentswere used to determine if the online students attained the same experience and success as thestudents in the traditional face to face section. One assessment was a quantitative analysiscomparing the grades of each section. Also, two surveys were created for the students to takeand reflect on their work on the projects and the course. The first survey was given after the firstdesign project and focused on how the course structure aided in teamwork on the project. Thesecond survey was
presented above. Such advice isstrongly reflective of a postfeminist sensibility. This is not to say that the women on the siteidentity personally with postfeminism as a philosophy or are even aware of it. The advice theyprovide, however, aligns with dominant postfeminist narratives and cultural ideas about howwomen can achieve success in the contemporary workplace. They emphasize the need forwomen to overcome any other issues or obstacles they may encounter as individuals (whether ornot they perceive of them as being related to gender). Women on the site promote the idea of a‘can-do’ woman who takes control of the situation and is confident.Minimizing and ReframingOne common piece of advice to women often with respect to gendered barriers was to
at-risk communities water wells. The storytellers were given three months to write their narratives with the target eventdate of March 1, 2019. They met with their story mentors (co-authors ME and SR on this paper)in November and December 2018 to discuss ideas and preliminary monologue content, followedby phone meetings with two Story Collider coaches every other week starting mid-January untilthe event to discuss experiences they thought were essential to their personal stories and craftingtheir monologues. They were asked to deeply reflect on their role as engineers and scientists insociety and contrast their ideals to real-world experiences and challenges while working withtheir
cultureof STEM departments [21], makes it more difficult for students who do not reflect these imagesto enter the community of practice [2], [22, p. 1207]. Engineer, researcher, student, and educator roles are commonly enacted by engineeringdoctoral students during their graduate studies [23]. While these academic roles may align with adoctoral students’ interests, they may also be strictly defined by the institution that the doctoralstudent serves. For example, a doctoral student may or may not be interested in being in the roleof an educator but may have to be a TA as part of their graduate program. However, regardlessof how interested they are in that role, the expectations and structure of their behaviors whenenacting that role are
tools, and the Internet. The 2005 cutoff date focuses the research on studies whichreflect the current relationship between pedagogy and technology. Furthermore, the selection of2005 as a cutoff reflects the shift that occurred in the field of engineering education research inthe early 2000s toward a more scholarly emphasis (Froyd, Lohmann, Johri, and Olds, 2014). Forexample, in 2003, the Journal of Engineering Education established new review guidelines forpapers submitted to the journal which reflected the greater expectations for rigorous inquiry inthe field (“History of JEE,” n.d.).The first selection round applied basic criteria intended to remove obviously irrelevant papers —those which do not mention engineering education or electrical
and Marshall College. Hye Rin’s research interests are self-reflection, academic interventions, online learning in education, mea- surement, temporal motivation, and resilience in students with disabilities. Specifically, her research focuses on (1) creating an effective intervention that helps URMs persist and continue on in STEM ma- jors via the social media platform, YouTube; (2) examining the nuances related to various measures of academic self-related motivational beliefs; (3) resilient students who achieve high levels of academic per- formance despite their disability; and (4) combining aspects of cognitive and positive psychology to study individual differences in motivation, particularly in exploring
the cultural changes that manystudents, faculty, staff, and university leadership crave. He notes that the success of UMBC’sprograms are founded upon a shared vision that reflect the common values of all involved parties[26]. For any institution, including UMBC, the development of this shared vision requiredsignificant time, financial support, passion, safe space for difficult conversations, strategicplanning and detailed documentation [27]. Deeper investigation into UMBC’s academic historyrevealed that it was not always a highly regarded institution with prestigious accolades. In thebeginning, it was a school that lacked direction, with low expectations for and from its attendees.Given these humble beginnings, one could argue that the
our third funding cycle. The crucial information for our SURGE program is providedin Table 1 below, where the figures reflect the status quo [2] as of February 2020. We supported123 students; 2 of whom quit without getting a bachelor’s degree, 101 have obtained theirbachelor’s degrees, and 20 making timely progress toward their bachelor’s degrees. About 32%of the supported students have been URMs. 123 scholars supported 101 degree recipients 20 continuing 45% women 43% women 55% women 55% men 57% men 45% men 32% URMs 30% URMs 45% URMs Table 1. The supported student
fields that ABET accredits [26].Within this federated organization, updates to the EAC General Criteria require a consensus ofthe engineering member societies for any changes to the non-harmonized criteria (Criteria 3, 5,and 6) and a consensus of all member societies for any changes to the harmonized criteria(Criteria 1, 2, 4, and 8). The non-harmonized criteria are likely to require more frequent updates,because they more closely reflect changing industry needs. Yet any such changes require theengineering member societies to achieve a consensus on a single set of student outcomes(Criterion 3), a single set of curriculum requirements (Criterion 5), and a single set of facultyqualifications (Criterion 6) that meet the needs of all programs and
instructor. Creating a relaxed classroom atmosphereWhen conducting the observations of the traditional lecture and large active learning classes, oneaspect that was noticed each time was the positive, relaxed atmosphere that the instructorscreated. There were instances during each of the observations where students were laughing atthe instructors’ jokes related to mathematics in both classes. Mickey talked specifically about theclassroom atmosphere when reflecting on the most positive aspect of the large active learningcourse: “[The instructor] makes it a fun learning environment like on Halloween she dressed up and did a fun thing so that was cool… She's just funny and she'll make jokes, and one time she sang to
were written for the four interview transcripts using the codes generatedfrom first cycle coding to document and reflect on the code choices, and to know more about theemergent categories and subcategories in the data. In transition from the first cycle coding to thesecond cycle, only in vivo coding was used to recode and reanalyze the data as this coding processrelies heavily on the participants own language for codes [13]. The emergent categories andsubcategories from the analytic memos were used in the after-cycle coding method to categorizethe data.In after first cycle coding, the code mapping technique was used and the details of the same areshown in Table 4. Code mapping is a technique that helps in assembling and organizing the
idea of reflective practice was not then part of the dialogue.Of equal interest is the fact that by and large the students preferred Social Studies as theirfirst choice. It was followed closely by Management Studies with special reference to humanrelations in industry. Whether or not these studies belong to what traditionalists call liberalknowledge is a moot point. But they certainly broadened their studies. Moreover,industrialists tended to support this approach to liberal studies and in both the US and UKhave continually complained to this day that graduates are inadequately prepared for industry.Korte has shown that graduates themselves wish they had been better prepared for their initialexperience of industry [26].Back in 1963 Andrews and
method approach to understand and assess student’s knowledge, level ofunderstanding, and perception of the 4+1 programs through the administration of a survey to 486undergraduate students at the College of Engineering and Computing in a minority-servinginstitution, Florida International University. A binary logistic regression model was thendeveloped to determine the variables influencing the expected student enrollment in thecombined programs. From the obtained results of the undergraduate graduating student survey,25% of the students indicated their intention to apply for graduate studies post theirundergraduate and 58% maintained a GPA above 3.0, which reflects their readiness and possibleeligibility to apply for a 4+1 program prior to their