more approachable to the middle school or high school students. Thesepresentations were practiced for the group during weekly seminars. After receiving feedbackfrom peers and educators, the pairs updated their presentations and took them to classrooms toshare with students. Grad Student STEM Share program provided several leadershipdevelopment opportunities of specific and translatable skills including communication, teaching,coordination of meetings and events, follow-up, teamwork, planning, presentation skills, andnetworking, as well as optional leadership coaching. Detailed feedback from the graduatestudents and the teachers whose classrooms they visited was positive and will be presented inthis paper, as well as details on the pilot year
students in aninterdisciplinary course with students in various departments to design and consult with a ruralHonduran community in need of a safe drinking water supply. During the course students workclosely with the community, a Honduran non-government organization, and professionaladvisors from various disciplines including civil engineering, water system operations, technicalcommunications, and political governance. The course focuses on wrestling with the challengesof defining a need, evaluating alternative solutions, and devising a plan for system construction,operation, and financing. Results of the first two efforts are discussed from the perspectives ofthe student participants, the community recipient, the NGO, and professional partners
links. 3. Testing reveals problems and changes propagate to other components. This learning objective emphasizes the iterative process sometimes required in systems design to resolve communication interdependencies between designers. It highlights how incorrect or incomplete requirements can cause problems in systems design, testing as a part of a larger verification and validation plan can uncover problems, and how design changes have a tendency to propagate between subsystems.These topics expose fundamental parts of the SE process26 but also align with broader objectivesin engineering education27 to view design as a multidisciplinary activity where designers musteffectively work in teams to meet conflicting
merely for individual students. This establishes whether the project isclear to move forward, needs intervention by organizational staff, or should end soon. Onecritical criterion for continuation is an ongoing relationship with an identified client. Policiesregarding implications of the green, yellow, red status are made known to the students.Project Course Grade Component BreakdownIn our revised and simplified approach, engineering project students are graded in three maincategories: progress against plans (30%), reporting & documentation (40%) and contribution toproject progress (30%). Progress against plans represents the same score of 0-30 assigned to allmembers of a project team by the responsible faculty member based upon MVP panel
) enablingof transfer credits and experiential credits; b) taking a community-based approach withcomprehensive programs and services for student veterans and their families which includehousing, health care, employment during the college; c) enabling veterans’ voice to be heardthrough roundtables, veteran associations, etc; d) have strong web presence easily accessible to theveterans; e) establish a specific point of contact; e) expand housing options; and f) implementtuition deferment plan to accommodate the GI Bill (Servicemen’s Readjustment Act of 1944)payment schedules; g) provide veteran focused orientations; h) provide faculty training related toveterans (ACE, 2008; Heineman, 2016; Olin Earl & Committee on Veterans' Affairs, 1949).Veterans
area of study. The responsibilities ofthe student and faculty member were clearly communicated each semester at the first workshop.Awardees signed a Mentoring Agreement at the beginning of each semester and submittedmentoring logs at the end of the semester. T4 STEM scholars and mentors committed to meetingat least every other week for the first six weeks of the semester to make sure the student got offto a good start, and on a monthly basis thereafter. Mentors worked with the students to developand manage an Individual Academic Learning Plan (IALP) which helped the student gauge theamount of time and coursework necessary to complete his/her studies by taking the courses inthe proper sequence.To maintain their scholarship, students were
1AbstractAs society addresses the major challenges associated with food, water, energy and climatechange there is an increasing need for engineers that are interdisciplinary and globallycompetent. The Master’s International Program (MIP) at the University of South Florida is agraduate partnership with the U.S. Peace Corps that provides over two years of supervisedprofessional service and international research experiences that include specialized training inlanguage, culture, participatory planning, and sustainable development. The students gain aglobal perspective while performing research in an international context of economic, social, andenvironmental limitations. Using a survey tool with quantitative and qualitative metrics, thisstudy assessed
day of researchwas dedicated to the elaboration of a “wish list,” as well as the planning of the 7-weekexperience. The student was free to include any ideas he ideally wanted to cover or implement.This list was then reviewed and arranged in order of importance by the faculty advisor and theundergraduate student. Being relatively new to programming on Arduino and with the concept ofcontrol and signal processing, the student started the experience by tackling multiple easyindividual tasks in order to get more familiar with the material involved in this mechatronicproject. The initial wish list included such tasks as adding LEDs to the car to provide visualchecks to the user; creating a smartphone application for wireless user input
more broadly aboutour mentoring agenda.As we were completing the survey and focus group analysis, an unusually high percentage ofwomen in the 2012 cohort of new STEM faculty (5 out of 8) presented the WISE@OU programwith a unique opportunity to test out different mentoring models and have a lasting impact onthis and subsequent faculty cohorts (Table 1). Therefore, in parallel with making plans to initiatea formal mentoring program, one-on-one, peer-to-peer and group mentoring activities wereorganized by the WISE@OU leadership team, first for the 2012 cohort and then expanded toinclude the 2011, 2013 and now 2014 STEM faculty hires. Some of these activities include one-on-one review of practical grant-related information, peer-review of
Student Opinion of TeachingSurvey. In fall 2013, the results encouraged further development of both hardware and softwarelabs, which we continued in fall 2014. Course enrollment also increased by 60% in fall 2014,from 13 to 21 students. Favorable teaching evaluations and comments from fall 2013 encouragedeven more classroom interaction, which led us to the “flipping” model. The fall 2014 course hasbeen evaluated with a new Teaching Survey, supplemented with custom questions about theflipped classroom. We further evaluated this flipped classroom for the degree of instructor-supported active learning and problem solving and student interaction, and for impact on studentfinal exam performance. The results were mixed, and we discuss plans for future
materials. 8. Demonstrate how to navigate through LMS packages such as Desire-2-Learn. 9. Student advising.With the OEOE model, faculty support student learning through facilitation in the EngineeringTechnology lab, mini-lectures, and validation of competencies through lab assignments andassessments.The proposed faculty loading formula is: 26 hrs/wk in the Engineering Technology labs at the ATC 7 hrs/wk of office hours in a dedicated office/cubicle at the ATC 7 hrs/wk of flexible planning timeThis staffing model required two enabling technologies, 1) A LMS that permitted sharedinstructor access to all ET courses so that the instructor on duty can answer online inquiries orassist students arriving in the open-lab with their
Paper ID #16992Mixed Method Study of the Evolution of Leadership Traits during a Leader-ship ExperienceMs. Luisa Ruiz Mendoza, University of Texas - El Paso Luisa is a recipient of the Gates Millennium Scholarship since 2009. In May 2013, Luisa graduated from Texas A&M University with a degree in Business Management. Then, in December 2014 she received a master’s degree in Higher Education Administration from the University of Texas at El Paso (UTEP). Ms. Ruiz plans to pursue a doctorate degree in Educational Leadership and Foundations with a concentration in Engineering Leadership at UTEP. She would like to work on a
Biomedical engineeringstudents follow the “Biodesign: The Process of Innovating Medical Technologies” by Paul Yocket. al.16 LTU requires 3 and 2 credits, while UDM requires 2 and 3 credits (respectively). Table 1: Approximate milestones and project timeline TABLE 1: COURSE MILESTONES Pre-Semester Nursing students self-select and register for directed study Week 1 Introduce all students to the program plan. BME students self-select Week 2 Form teams via CATME tool, conduct all-hands kick-off meeting Week 4 Introduction to clients, students plan project Week 6 Complete project plan Week 12 Complete product definition Week 16: Complete
approval of the degree byWashington’s Higher Education Coordinating Board (HEC Board)[1] and the Board of Regents ofthe University, a faculty committee was formed to lay the foundation for the EE degree anddevelop the goals, educational objectives, and desired student outcomes for the program.Of key concern to this committee, chaired by the author, was obtaining ABET accreditation assoon as possible1. Therefore, much of our planning was focused on creating a robust BSEEdegree from the outset. Particular attention was given to the Capstone Experience. According toABET, students in an accredited EE program must have a Capstone Experience: Students must be prepared for engineering practice through a curriculum culminating in a major
on their executive committee as Director for International Chapters and has organized local Fort Laud- erdale chapter events for over 20 years.Dr. Diana Mitsova, Florida Atlantic University Diana Mitsova has a background in research design, statistical and spatial analysis, as well as environ- mental planning and modeling using geographic information systems, and interactive computer simula- tion. Her primary area of research involves the impact of urban development on ecosystems and other environmentally sensitive areas.Her recent publications focus on the impact of climate-related stressors on coastal communities and the implementation of planning approaches related to enhancing coastal re- silience to natural
include motion planning and localization of ground robots. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 A Workshop for Integration of Internet of Things into Green Energy Manufacturing AbstractThis paper describes enhancement of green energy manufacturing subjects using a project basedlearning workshop with Internet of things (IoT). The Internet of things is a collection of all physicaldevices that are controlled or monitored over the Internet. The evolution of IoT has led to thediffusion of wireless personal devices, such as smart mobile phones, personal computers andwearable devices, designed to operate over the Internet. It is
ofthe most commonly used approaches for term weighting (Aizawa, 2003) and is describedfurther in Section 4. Such term frequency analyses have been used in numerouseducational contexts, from examination of Master’s thesis and PhD dissertations toidentify common topics (Rivera & Larrondo-Petrie, 2017), to engineering term languagegaps between professors and students in freshman-level engineering courses as a barrierto learning (Variawa et al., 2013; Variawa & McCahan, 2012).2. Course Description and Student DemographicsOur university’s onsite course focuses on the selection, design, and implementation ofdecentralized systems for water reclamation and reuse. Topics include process analysisand system planning, engineered and natural system
, depending on the round ofstakeholder feedback and commensurate to the time commitment required. We plan to expandour recruitment efforts in 2019 to increase survey participation/completion numbers frommarginalized students. In the remainder of this section, each step of the instrument developmentprocess is summarized briefly. For a more detailed description of the process see [10].Theoretical Constructs and Item Bank DevelopmentThe initial item bank was based on the MCCS, which was developed from a multi-site case studyof student support practitioners and students involved in six different student support centersserving STEM students across four U.S. universities [1],[9]. For the development of an itembank, we leveraged the theoretical constructs
Technology at Oklahoma State University has strategically planned a shifttoward an interdisciplinary senior design focus and dedicated extensive resources to achieve it,they are having to adjust previous course models. The paper will discuss the structure of onelong-standing interdisciplinary architectural engineering senior design class within the college inthe architecture department, called the Comprehensive Design Studio (AE-CDS), and compare itto developments of the last three semester of the newly developing engineering InterdisciplinarySenior Design projects (ISD) from the perspective of an architecture faculty member who hastaught both courses. In examining these courses, some important characteristics regardinginterdisciplinary team
of the course basedon student knowledge and attitudes towards a variety of aspects of teaching. Finally, we providerecommendations for others looking to develop similar courses at other universities.MethodsCourse Improvement ApproachImprovement of the pedagogy course was funded by an Instructional Improvement Grant andincluded phases of consultation with experts, literature review, course materials review, anddevelopment of refined lesson plans and course website.The faculty instructor and graduate student researcher consulted with experts on active learningand inclusive teaching. Michael Prince, a professor and scholar in active learning withinengineering education, provided a workshop on active learning for faculty, post
years of external funding. While avariety of data is used to evaluate applicants, such as GRE and GPA scores and letters ofrecommendation, the unique feature of the NSF GRFP is the requirement to write a two pageresearch proposal and a three page statement of personal goals (hereby referred to as the“personal statement”). In the award cycle in which this study was conducted, students couldapply once as an undergraduate student, and both their years in graduate school, anaffordance that has since changed.The prompts for the two essays do not necessarily align with Stewardship theory. Forexample, the prompt for the Personal Statement asks students to “Please outline your educational and professional development plans and career goals. How do
level (verb) extraction.Figure 2. Steps to Processing Syllabi using NLP3.2. Steps 1 and 2: Data Collection and Text Processing.In Step 1, we collected and inventoried AM course syllabi and AM Competency Model. Wecollected 133 of 200 (66.5%) syllabi documents from five Northwest Florida state colleges andseparated them into four course categories, based on the AM programs’ plans of study: 1) coretechnical (n=77), 2) core non-technical (n=21), 3) elective technical (n=34), and 4) elective non-technical (n=1). We also used the current AM Competency Model downloaded from the DOLCareerOneStop website [4].Step 2 involved extraction of competencies within the documents (e.g., from syllabi coursedescriptions and outcomes and from competencies listed in
university. VTAB scholarship is basedsolely on financial need and academic merit.Before Enrolling at our university: The second section of the survey examined the student’sexperiences at their various 2-year schools. From question #4, the most striking if notpredictable finding was that the majority of all three cohorts attended a 2-year school due tofinancial reasons. Figure 3 shows the % of scholars in each cohort citing financial reasons forattending a 2-year school instead of a 4-year institution. Figure 3: Percentage of Scholars in each cohort citing financial reasons to attend 2-year school instead of a 4-year school. Question #4.Responses to question #6 show that most scholars (over 90% of each cohort) always planned
underrepresentedminorities. Coppin State University’s 5-year strategic plan aims to address the nation’s obligationto strengthen and diversify the STEM workforce (Eugene et al., 2013). A scholarship programbetween Spelman and NASA targets the enhancement of representation, especially amongwomen from minority backgrounds, in STEM fields through a DDEP (Falconer & Guy, 1989).The DDEP collaboration between The Atlanta University Center (AUC) and Georgia TechInstitute of Technology originated to enhance STEM access for minority students and focuses onattracting and increasing minority representation in STEM fields (Jackson, 2007). All the articlesin this cluster referenced DDEPs as pivotal means for creating a broader impact in developing adiverse, globally
Transformation Team on the American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE), the Research Committee of Intermodal Freight Transport committee, Freight Transportation Planning and Logistics committee of Transportation Research Board (TRB) among others. Dr. Sarder chaired the Industrial & Systems Engineering Annual Conference in 2016 and 2017, and the Engineering Lean Six Sigma Conference (ELSS) in 2013.Mohammad Mayyas, Bowling Green State UniversityMohammed Abouheaf, Bowling Green State University Dr. Abouheaf earned his B.Sc. and M.Sc. degrees in Electronics Engineering from Mansoura University and completed his Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering at the University of Texas at Arlington in 2013. Currently, he holds the
historically encountereda substantial need to investigate the enduring impacts of past SEEK participants, although theircapacity to conduct such in-depth analyses has been limited. Their prior and ongoing inquiriespredominantly revolved around camp evaluations, the perspectives, and experiences ofparticipants (including mentors, students, and volunteers), the requirements of sponsors, and theformulation of strategic plans for subsequent camps. National Society of Black Engineers (NSBE) created the Summer Engineering Experiencefor Kids (SEEK) program in 2007 with one site in Washington, D.C., to inspire Black studentsthrough the many diverse opportunities and wonders of STEM fields. SEEK is a free,complimentary three-week summer program that
completing tasks on time, the graduate student andinstructor discussed a plan to help the student. We used the following points for the learningobjectives mentioned above.Table 1. Introduction to Scientific Research course assignments and grading policy Learning Assignment Points/Total objective points Scientific method Hypothesis & Aims Experimental design plans 20 points & 40 points Laboratory safety Safety quiz, Safety tour 15 points total Reading scientific Reading
start with education [9]. Social justice was also made a center point for the 2021Biden Infrastructure plan, which promised “40% of the benefits of climate and cleaninfrastructure investments to disadvantaged communities” [11]. These initiatives further the pushfor engineers to consider how engineering projects can serve both the technical requirementsthey are designed for and the communities they are built in.Understanding the social aspects has traditionally come with professional experience; however,giving engineering students an understanding of the social elements during their time in schoolcan encourage early development and implementation of this understanding [9]. Unfortunately,studies suggest that, as students progress through a
wrong? Was it something related to the equipment? Was a step of the protocol missed?Were our tools and techniques not sufficiently accurate? Were conditions different than in thecited literature study?) Some errors can be quite subtle, while others are very well-known. Thestudents can also be asked for suggestions on how to improve the experiment or minimize theidentified errors.Another way to combat “bad” data is to have backup or example data sets available for studentsto use for reports. These data can be acquired while TAs are preparing for the lab, or they can begenerated from previous semesters if available. While it does not have to be perfect, the exampledata set will hopefully be more representative of the planned experiment’s expected
Nolan & Louis Emily & Anna Learning Internal/Personal: Experience hosting External: Evolution of the program events, socially connecting with (how it changed over time); impact on others, learning to use makerspace student participants; student experiences tools and equipment, development of in engineering; culture of engineering communication & leadership skills Agency Planning focused: Making progress Student gocused: Supporting with projects & event planning underserved students, Promoting