, such as through first-year introduction to engineeringcourses or through required design “cornerstone” subjects throughout the undergraduatecurriculums across the US. This is partly driven by the requirements that ABET sets forengineering degrees. ABET Criteria 3 (a) through (k) include design explicitly, especially Page 26.1362.2through criteria (c) and (e). The ABET criteria also implicitly include design throughrequirements for teamwork, ethics, social context, and other broad considerations. Another driving factor to include engineering design in freshman courses is to increase student interest inengineering, improve retention, and improve
● researching and● writing business letters ● reading/evaluating literature referencing● making presentations ● basic communication theory ● writing● writing reports ● Gantt Charts abstracts/summaries ● pitching your projectEngineering Professionalism - This laboratory allows students to explore applications of ethicsand systems of moral principles and environmental stewardship in engineering practice● Ethics in Engineering ● FE and PE registration ● history of engineering The SLOs were further subdivided into core competencies (a sample of competencies is provided in Table 1), which
problems; Synthesize and transfer knowledge across disciplinary boundaries; Comprehend factors inherent in complex problems; Apply integrative thinking to problem-solving in ethically and socially responsible ways; Recognize varied perspectives; Gain comfort with complexity and uncertainty; Think critically, communicate effectively, and work collaboratively; and Become flexible thinkers.In this institutional context, we have developed an interdisciplinary course (ProgrammingNarratives: Computer Animated Storytelling [PN]) designed to help non-computer systems majorstudents develop computational thinking skills through computer programming combined withEnglish writing skills to satisfy the college requirement of an
scientific assertions require supporting 4.69 4.56 -0.13 evidence. I have the ability to analyze data and other information. 4.56 4.56 0.00 I understand science. 4.44 4.44 0.00 I have learned about ethical conduct in my field. 4.25 4.44 0.19 I have learned laboratory techniques. 4.00 4.13 0.13 I have an ability to read and understand primary literature. 4.50 4.38 -0.13 I have skill in how to give an effective oral presentation. 4.19 4.44 0.25 I have skill
better bandage for an application of their choice. Each groupof students defined the need/problem, designed a solution, pitched their solution to potentialinvestors, purchased materials from a supply store, tested their prototype, and demonstrated theirprototype. At the end of the activity, it was revealed that the supply store had charged each groupdifferent prices for materials to simulate different allocation of resources. The students engagedin discussion of the technical aspects of their designs as well as the financial, ethical, and societalconsiderations that must be considered when designing solutions in global health.Central Dogma of BiologyThis module introduced basic principles of genetics and the mechanisms of DNA replication
. Eachwinter the Pathway Scholars were included in the required book club reading that supportsdeveloping a strong work ethic, leadership and overall success. The selections were,EntreLeadership by Dave Ramsey, QBQ! The Question behind the Question by John Miller, andIt Worked for Me by Colin Powell, and roundtable discussions were held during the first seminarof the spring semester.The Pathway Scholars were also incorporated into the formalized College Peer Mentor Trainingprogram that was held in two, five-hour sessions. This training covered a variety of topics andactivities to prepare them as mentor to incoming students and develop leadership.Advising Meetings & CommunicationsThe Pathway Scholars were required to meet with a staff member from
248 4.13 0.00 Thinking Cognition, Systems 247 3.47 247 4.10 0.00 thinking, and Thinking mental Critical Thinking 248 3.43 248 4.16 0.00 Creative 247 3.40 247 4.23 0.00 Thinking Innovation 248 3.46 248 4.14 0.00 Professionalism 244 3.50 244 4.09 0.00 Ethics & 245 3.44 245 3.99 0.00
& Materials Awareness - Materials -1 -2 15 ETI Industrial 3 * ET None MSSC - Safety Hazards Ethics and - 1701 Safety Core Safety / Standards Culture OSHA-10hr6 ETM Mech, 3 * ET None Mech, Mech, Mech, - 1010C Measuremen Core
, human factors, product liability, and ethical issues) • Final Evaluation and Verification (Manufacture and Assembly, Testing and Refinement, Project/Development Cost) • Conclusions and RecommendationsThese sections were chosen for assessment because these sections require students to apply their: 1) Knowledge of how to recognize the audience for a particular communication, determine the needs of that audience, and successfully address those needs; 2) Ability to present test results through graphics and text; 3) Ability to analyze and interpret data; and 4) Ability to develop reasonable conclusions and recommendations based on their interpretation.These are all
self-directed professional development (lifelong learning), interpersonal skills(people skills), team working skills, able to work well in a diverse environment (cultural, gender,age, company position, etc.), oral communication, written communication, professional skills,good work habits, sound ethics and integrity, timeliness, time management, knowledge ofcontemporary issues, and understands the societal impacts of technical solutions. Theseattributes were derived largely from ABET’s student outcomes for Engineering Technologyprograms. The student’s evaluation contains open-ended questions for the student to share theirexperiences. The final evaluations are intended to be the vehicle that the faculty supervisor willuse for grading. An
suchanalyses are consistent with the ABET engineering criteria 3(c), 3(h) and 3(j) that students havethe ability to make decisions “within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental,social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability”, “understand theimpact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context” andhave “a knowledge of contemporary issues”.10 Via this debate and corresponding case study, thestudents learn how to think outside the box and look at the big picture in its entirety whenapproaching a problem. The second debate “Do alternative energy sources stand a chance?” is scheduled at the endof the summer program. As the Young Scholars become acquainted with
(where 1 = Not Really, 3 = Neutral and 5 = Absolutely). Dimensions Developed to Measure Participant’s CS Interest Code Dimension atcs Attitudes about CS competency. atcsgender Attitudes about the role of gender in CS atct Understanding of computational thinking blg Sense of belonging in the CS classroom. clet Attitudes about social implications and ethics. cltrcmp Understanding around cultural competency. mtr Access to CS Mentors. prcs Pre-Collegiate CS awareness. Table 1: Survey Instrument Dimensions to Measure CS
student groups,” itfalls short of this claim. Beyond the vignette's loose interpretation of “real classroomexperiences,” the vignette allows for a shallow interpretation of the concepts of “funds ofknowledge" and "place-based education.” Moll et al (1992) describe “funds of knowledge” ascultural knowledge and aspects of a student's home life that students bring to classroom. Toclaim that this is present anywhere in this vignette seems to miss the mark. So then, what difference does it make whether Rick introduced the concept of “crushedcans” or not? Beyond the ethics of research, this case study matters because the entire argumentfor the relevance and importance of the “crushed can” metaphor rests on Rick himselfintroducing the concept. If
graduate in December 2016 with both degrees and is looking forward to securing a teaching position within a research university and continuing his in-depth research on Engineering Ed- ucation. He is one of two scholarships awarded by NARST (National Association for Research in Science Teach- ing) to attend the ESERA (European Science Education Research Association) summer research confer- ˇ e Budˇejovice, Czech Republic in August 2016. In addition, he has been named as one of 14 ence in Cesk´ Jhumki Basu Scholars by the NARST’s Equity and Ethics Committee in 2014. He is the first and only individual from his native country and Texas Tech University to have received this prestigious award. Fur- thermore
. With great effort to haveno interference in these discussions, the PI or a dedicated undergraduate assistant attended thesesessions and took notes. The undergraduate assistant was also critical in providing support andmaintaining order and timeliness among the students on a day-to-day basis, as well as facilitatingvarious activities, workshops, and events that occurred during the program. The seminars andworkshops that were offered throughout the program were presented by experts in theirrespective fields. The subjects of the seminars included twice-exceptional education and thecreative product. Workshops were presented on responsible conduct of research and ethics,graduate school and preparing for the GRE exam, and technical writing. These
design projects for second and third year students,and the 1955 L. E. Grinter Report5 recommended twin goals for engineering education oftechnical (including analysis and creative design) and general (ethics, humanities, socialsciences, math and basic sciences), with engineering content limited to upper division classes.6Constrained by institutional credit-hour caps, courses on engineering design or laboratoryexperiences that supported design activities, such as shop or manufacturing technology, weregradually eliminated from the engineering curriculum.This approach started to reverse in the early 1990’s as employers identified the paucity of real-world content, engineering design and creative content as important shortcomings of
- ing, where she leads research projects that focus on technology in education. She holds a doctorate degree in the psychology in of education from Arizona State University and a masters degree in public health from the University of Arizona.Mr. Derrick Cornell Gilmore, Kentucky State University Derrick C. Gilmore is the Director of Research, Grants and Sponsored Programs at Kentucky State Uni- versity. In this role he provides oversight of administrative functions that include research compliance, re- search ethics, education and policy, administration, and technology transfer. His research interest include: sponsored research capacities/impacts at Minority Serving Institutions, behavioral health for African
; Radiation) Important to know • Fluid (flow) properties • Electrical fundamentals & photo-voltaic effect • Engineering design process • Foundations and ethics of team work • Problem identification and evaluations • Students should use systematic problem-solving method to evaluate and
,phenomenon, or process under investigation by thinking and thus writing and thus thinking evenmore about them” (p. 41). “Analytic Memos” can act as a “prompt or trigger for writtenreflection on the deeper and complex meanings it evokes”45 (p. 42). Examples of “AnalyticMemos” that Saldaña45 provided includes reflections about personal connections to the data,study’s research questions, codes, definitions, patterns, categories, themes, concepts, assertions,possible networks, theory, problems with the study, personal or ethical dilemmas, futuredirections of the study, other analytic memos, and study’s final reporting (pp. 43–50).“Analytical Memos” were used to help deeply contemplate the meaning of the data and usedthem to help analyze the data45
PitfallsClarification Promise. Clarify the underlying Epistemological Pitfall. Limiting instructor,content, skills, and dispositions needed to learner, and researcher conceptions ofmaster a certain domain knowledge and knowingPersonalization Promise. Find personalized Ownership/Security Pitfall. Mishandlingpaths through the learning process for each and learner data legally, ethically, andevery student economically (intentionally or not)Optimization Promise. Increase learning gains Development Pitfall. Creating an adaptivewhile reducing the time durations needed to learning system can bankrupt an institution dueachieve them to high
Paper ID #18277An Analysis of Emotional Fluctuation and Its Causes in the Productive Prac-tice for Engineering Undergraduates: Based on the Case of an EngineeringMajor in ChinaMiss Jiaojiao Fu, Beihang University Jiaojiao FU is a Ph.D. candidate in School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Beihang University Beijing, PRC. She received B.A. in China Agricultural University and M.Ed. in Beihang University, China. Her academic and research interests include engineering education, engineering ethics education, first-year engineering education, lifelong education. From April 2017 to October 2017, she will in College of
, thosestudents were not part of this study as they are not Engineering majors. This course introducesstudents to the field of engineering, the design process, and communication of ideas with graphics.Includes team design projects, drawing instruction and assignments, the role of CAD, introductionto the engineering disciplines, engineering history, ethics and case studies of engineering featsand failures, and how things are made. This course has a class capacity of 48 students and offered5 times throughout the academic year.Whatcom Community College:Whatcom Community College (WCC) is a two-year community college that offers a range oftransfer-oriented degrees and professional-technical training programs. The college servesapproximately 11,000 students
firms,” Journal of Career Assessment, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 95–110, 2018.[19] W. Faulkner, “Becoming and belonging: Gendered processes in engineering,” in The Gender Politics of ICT, J. Archibald, J. Emms, F. Grundy, J. Payne, and E. Turner, Eds. London: Middlesex University Press, 2005, pp. 15–26.[20] N. Pless and T. Maak, “Building an inclusive diversity culture: Principles, processes and practice,” Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 129-147, 2004.[21] J. W. Smith and S. Joseph, “Workplace challenges in corporate America: Differences in black and white,” Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 743-765, 2010.[22] D. Riley, A. E. Slaton, and A. L
. Full participation in this pedagogical study wasencouraged (but not required) for the students enrolled in the module; appropriate processes werefollowed to obtain ethical (IRB) approval from LJMU before the study began. We have groupedthe participants into 5 categories (G1, G2, G3, G4 and G5) based on their backgrounds.The Professional and Leadership Skills module contains a 3-hour creativity lecture sessioncomposed of two parts: (1) entrepreneurship and (2) creativity. The entrepreneurship portionfocuses on the definition of entrepreneurship, the characteristics and competencies ofentrepreneurs, and examples of local entrepreneurs. The creativity portion of the session (theportion of greatest interest here) focuses on creativity identity
. 22, no. 6, pp. 725–730, 1950.[9] P. A. Simon, S. Finger, D. Krackhardt, D. P. Siewiorek, and A. Smailagic, “Levels of Social Network Analysis and Small Team Problem Solving in the Classroom,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., 2015.[10] J. Y. Tsai, D. A. Kotys-Schwartz, and D. Knight, “Introducing Actor-Network Theory Via the Engineering Sophomore Year,” in American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 2015.[11] M. Kenny Feister et al., “Exploring the Social Processes of Ethics in Student Engineering Design Teams,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2015, p. ID# 13322.[12] E. Brewe, V. Sawtelle, L. H. Kramer, G. E. O’Brien, I. Rodriguez, and P
Architectural Engineering (CEAE). She has served as the Associate Chair for Under- graduate Education in the CEAE Department, as well as the ABET assessment coordinator. Professor Bielefeldt was also the faculty director of the Sustainable By Design Residential Academic Program, a living-learning community where interdisciplinary students learn about and practice sustainability. Biele- feldt serves as the chair of ASEE’s Community Engagement Division and on the AAAS Committee for Scientific Freedom and Responsibility. She is also a licensed P.E. Professor Bielefeldt’s research interests in engineering education include service-learning, sustainable engineering, social responsibility, ethics, and diversity.Dr. Jacquelyn F
engineering.Amy Kramer P.E., Ohio State UniversityDr. Emily Dringenberg, Ohio State University Dr. Dringenberg is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Ohio State Uni- versity. She holds a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering (Kansas State ’08), a M.S. in Industrial Engineering (Purdue ’14) and a Ph.D. in Engineering Education (Purdue ’15). Her team, Beliefs in Engineering Re- search Group (BERG), utilizes qualitative methods to explore beliefs in engineering. Her research has an overarching goal of leveraging engineering education research to shift the culture of engineering to be more realistic and inclusive. Dr. Dringenberg is also interested in neuroscience, growth mindset, engi- neering ethics
engineering design and how that learning supports transfer of learning from school into professional practice as well as exploring students’ conceptions of diversity and its importance within engineering fields.Michelle Kay Bothwell, Oregon State University Michelle Bothwell is an Associate Professor of Bioengineering at Oregon State University. Her teaching and research bridge ethics, social justice and engineering with the aim of cultivating an inclusive and socially just engineering profession.Nick AuYeung, Oregon State University I received my BS from the University of Connecticut and my Ph.D. at Oregon State University, both in Chemical Engineering. I then did postdoctoral research in solar thermochemistry at the
ASEE CIA paper - Google Docs ● Resolve problems at the interface of art and design and computer science through innovative thinking and visual expression. ● Demonstrate an ability to evaluate ethical consequences in creative expression, technical innovation and professional practice. ● Practice lifelong learning, inquiry, and discovery via directed selfresearch and inquiry for artistic and technical projects. These objectives are obtained through the combination of existing courses present in the Computer Science and Art & Design programs, thus requiring little institutional overhead. The
-133, 2009. [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/29734077.[6] B. M. Capobianco, "Undergraduate women engineering their professional identities" vol. 12, no. 2-3, pp. 95-117, 2006-08-30 2006, doi: 10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.v12.i2- 3.10.[7] K. L. Meyers, M. Ohland, A. Pawley, S. Stephen, and K. Smith, Factors relating to engineering identity. 2012.[8] M. C. Loui, "Ethics and the Development of Professional Identities of Engineering Students," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 94, no. 4, pp. 383-390, 2005, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00866.x.[9] A. Rodriguez and M. P, Factors related to advanced course-taking patterns, persistence in science technology engineering and