) Program planning and execution support, and (3) Classroom and programperformance support. These categories led to development and refinement of a college levelpedagogical practice taxonomy and inventory which was used in a second and third stage of theresearch in which data was collected on 4929 community college students in STEM majors. Theintent of the research is to determine the role of students’ creativity and propensity of innovationon their persistence in STEM and the impact that use of particular pedagogical support practiceshad on persistence, creativity and propensity for innovation in STEM. Structural equation models (SEMs) have been developed and updated with multiplerounds of data collection. These models have been used for
feelthat citing financial restrictions is a more acceptable response [7], Other studies indicate thatfinancial constraints are not so much evidence of an active barrier to participation as a retroactivejustification for the decision not to participate [8]. Most studies believe that the apparentfinancial barrier is more of a misinformation barrier. There is often more financial aid availablethan most students are aware and this combined with the possibility that students tend tooverestimate the cost of study abroad in their minds [7].B. Socio-Economic BackgroundWhile the financial barrier is probably over-cited and blown out of proportion, it is important tonote that lower income students are less likely to plan to study abroad than higher
4th yearlearners together. Seniors have a higher level of performance expectation, including leadership ontheir project teams. In Design, student engineers learn and practice the essential elements ofengineering design: scoping, modeling, experimentation, analysis, use of modern tools,multi-disciplinary systems view, creativity, safety, business plans, andglobal/societal/environmental impacts.The project problems are sourced from industry clients or proposed by student engineers. Studentteams of 3 -5 members each write a Team Contract, occupy Project Rooms, and work togetherapproximately 15 hours per week to complete the project each semester. They select roles such asProject Manager, Client Communications, Documentation Manager, and Research
, or physics major. ● Demonstrate progress in the major by enrolling in required courses. ● Have at least a 3.0 GPA in their major field (all STEM courses required for major).All S-STEM programs, as directed by the solicitation, should provide an ecosystem of supportthat includes faculty mentoring and a scholar cohort. The AugSTEM Scholars Program also usesan Individual Development Plan (IDP) framework to scaffold student contact and programming.IDPs can take different forms and appear in many workplace and educational settings. A scholaralumnus in graduate school suggested incorporating IDPs into the program. This led us to theAAAS MyIDP (an IDP platform for faculty, post-doctoral researchers and graduate students) [8],materials on
namesake forreporting to a cycle-based, chapter-centered, growth mindset-oriented development program [8]. Summary of the NRP v.3 components1. Chapter Management Tool (CMT): a comprehensive chapter management and improvement tool consisting of a Chapter Plan is required by the chapters towards organizing their events and programs with continuous feedback from regional leaders and the NRP Reports;2. Chapter Assessment Reports (i.e., NRP Reports 1 & 2): two comprehensive NRP reports documenting the chapter's events, programs, and ability to further the SHPE mission and vision. The reports are be used to assess the chapters areas for growth and strength and making award determinations; and3. Chapter
not share any classes. Consequently, this author was often theonly black student in their courses. They found it much more difficult to find students who werewilling to work on assignments with them. They would often reach out to their classmates andother students would say that they “weren’t working with anyone” or “weren’t available” at thetimes this author planned to work. Those same students would later be seen working together atthe same times and locations where they were working. Another author noted having the same experience and also struggled to find students to studywith for qualifying exams. The few Black students who entered this author’s PhD program beforewarned her that the qualifying exam experience is often quite
are beginning to plan how to equip students with thenecessary skills and competencies in AI. This literature review delves into AI literacy in highschool contexts. It employed Kitchenham and Charters guiding principles to plan, conduct, andreport on the status of high school AI literacy research. Following an extensive search acrossleading academic databases simply using the terms “high school” AND “artificial intelligence,”1,943 articles were initially found. Strong inclusion and exclusion criteria were developed toensure the selection of articles that only related to research primarily focused on high school AIliteracy. After rigorous screening for relevance and availability, we selected 16 articles related tohigh school AI literacy.We
skills commensurate with students’ educational levels. • To formulate a plan for skill-building and delivery in an interdisciplinary engineering curriculum, interfacing with existing courses on power and energy generation and distribution. • To instill a sense of urgency for learning and training in green energy, addressing current, new, and future challenges, and responding to the urgent impacts of global warming on human health, the environment, and overall well-being.The curriculum integrates diverse educational levels, faculty expertise, disciplinary areas, studentbackgrounds, industrial requirements, learning methodologies, and practical applications aligningwith students
a platform for students to role-play a fictional company for enterpriseresource planning [49]. Other online role-play simulations focus on students taking the role ofproject managers with students receiving immediate feedback on their decisions [50], [51], [52].The course redesign described in this paper builds upon the work of Maxim, Brunvand, andDecker [57], which used role-play in a redesigned game design course, CIS 488, at theUniversity of Michigan – Dearborn. We re-used this work with some modifications in therevision of the second course in our two-course game design sequence. This course beginning in2017 had the students role-play as developers of a failing game company with the goal ofsimulating concept to release creation of 3D
framework’, ‘social medium’, and ‘participate outreach’.Figure 4d) demonstrates the bigram network related to tweets discussion online EE, where itwas observed that the education board in the central node connected with the words ‘distancelearning’, and Oklahoma State’. There are also conversations about ‘plans to keep the schoolbuilding closed’ in communication-related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Additional notablewords would be ‘institutional care fund’. These discussions were about the courses becomingonline and institute initiatives to cover the funds of the students who paid for campus coursesyet become online due to the consequences of COVID-19.Figure 4: Top bigrams for each group c) engineering profession, and d) distance learningFigure 4e
Dean and Nariman Farvardin Professor of Engineering at the Clark School on Jan- uary 5, 2009, having come to the school in 1995 as an assistant professor and served as chair of the school’s Department of Aerospace Engineering from 2006 to 2009. As dean, Pines has led the devel- opment of the Clark School’s current strategic plan and achieved notable successes in key areas such as improving teaching in fundamental undergraduate courses and raising student retention; achieving suc- cess in national and international student competitions; giving new emphasis to sustainability engineering and service learning; promoting STEM education among high school students; increasing the impact of research programs; and expanding
betaking the course. In general, since this knowledge did not come from specific users, insightsapplied to the entire group of students, or the potential variation in the group. Their focus wasinsights in two areas: student preparedness for learning and factors that could affect interest andmotivation. The team sought a general understanding such that they could plan content andactivities that were appropriate and engaging for the entire class.This technique may have stemmed from deep knowledge of prior students that has grown into acomposite image over time, and the assumption that future students will fit into this composite.For example, the instructor’s insights came from having taught the same class several times inthe past. However, since
recruit underrepresented students who plan to major in one of the STEM areas. HCC is one oftwo community colleges in the six-member AMP Alliance. There is a great deal of synergyamong HCC AMP and REEMS objectives and activities. In addition to the required communityservice required of AMP students, HCC AMP students are encouraged to join the REEMSstudent cohorts in university tours, meeting university faculty, advisors, and administrators,participation in student development workshops. The REEMS PI also serves and the HCCprogram director for the HCC AMP program. Both AMP and REEMS students seek commonoutcomes: participation in programs that provide direction, structure, and motivation. Fourteenof the REEMS students from the 2015/2016 and 2016
) overcoming imposter syndrome, and (6) valuing mentorship. Participantscollectively discussed their images and related experiences in a final group session. Steps toaddress emergent themes were also identified and presented to the Associate Dean for StudentAffairs, along with a plan to showcase their work.I. IntroductionThe discrepancy between the number of Black students who complete a college degree comparedto their white peers has been of national concern for many years [1], [2]. In engineering, thisproblem persists and has been exacerbated in the last decade by stagnant growth in awardeddegrees for Black students [2], [3]. Factors contributing to this educational gap may result frominstitutional racism in an institution’s policies, values, and
, there were no significant differences between the twogroups. Supplemental post-survey questions revealed that while most participants indicated theyplan to integrate more physical computing concepts within their courses, no significantdifferences existed between male and female teachers’ intentions to integrate such concepts. Thisstudy contributes to the limited literature on P-12 physical computing research within the U.S. Ithas implications for improving physical computing PD efforts offered by higher educationinstitutions and engineering education programs. Moreover, it provides some insight into males’and females’ attitudes toward physical computing, which can help inform the planning of futurephysical computing design challenges and PD
earning Year designation graduates designation 2017 7 100 7 2018 9 89 10 2019 10 107 9 2020 8 84 10 2021 13 88 15 2022 14 82 17Each year, graduating seniors who earned the sustainability designation are surveyed about theimpact of the designation on their job search and future plans. Six of 16 students (38%) in thefirst two graduating classes self-reported their post
well as career and laboratoryinterests warrants future study. We aim to do this in collaboration with institutions with astudent population that better matches the diversity of the country. Additionally, in futurework, we plan to include an additional post-module demographic survey question: “Do youidentify as a member of the LGBTQIA+ community? (Identities may include lesbian, gay,bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex, asexual, or other gender or sexuality identities notexplicitly named)”. The addition of this question would facilitate investigation of the impact oftoy adaptation on engineering on LGBTQIA+ students, which is important given thatLGBTQIA+ students face greater marginalization, devaluation, and health and wellness
departments on participating & identifying students once they accept offer to graduate school April 15 Graduate School Decision Day; Graduate school coordinators in Physics and Chemistry identify students from accepted cohort April 15 – June 1 GREaT GradS offer letters are emailed May - June Planning of summer activities July 1 GREaT GradS Program starts August 15 GREaT GradS Program endsGREaT GradS Programming – GREaT GradS primary goal is to offer students a six-week immersive researchexperiences with programming in resources recognition, personal preparation, career preparation,and network building (Table 2, organized by the primary goal). The programming goal is
Figure 5 CSE12 pass rate data from Fall ‘17 - Spring ‘22 In preparation for the greater ITL effort, we have been focused on closing equity gaps in ourlarge, gateway CSE12 course, beginning fall of 2021. We used institutional data and developed a processfor improvement as detailed in the later section Training Development Plan. Through a series of meetings,members of the ITL Team during academic year 2021 - 2022, collaborated in meetings to review 1)teaching methods, 2) assessments, and 3) scalability in relation to student outcomes and course data, andspecifically looking at equity gaps between URM and non-URM student subgroups. Inquiry was thefoundation for all pre-ITL meetings with the guiding question “How can we teach differently to
, thisis rarely the case for interpersonal relationships. There are documented benchmarks forgraduate students such as degree plans, proposals, and theses. Although important for thedocumentation of work completed towards the degree, they are very rarely qualitative orquantitative of the experience had by the student. Just as a degree plan or a proposal setsexpectations and outlines a plan of action for work, an Individual Development Plan (IDP)additionally documents the expectations and action items for the working relationshipbetween a faculty mentor and their student. The IDP was developed by the AmericanAssociation for the Advancement of Science and experts from multiple universities as a toolfor students to assess their skills and career
Engineering equal numbers of male and female students wereselected from AUC and Princeton. The wind pump was intended to serve as a test vehicle for useof wind energy in this community. It was moderately successful but because of its relative lowflow rates, it did not have a huge impact on the community (unless the diesel engine was brokenor out of fuel in which case it was better than nothing). While the wind pump could not producesufficient water for flood irrigation, it can produce enough water for other low-water usageagricultural methods like small integrated protected systems or hydroponics.For the second edition of the programmed planned for the Summer 2020, the team was to designan integrated aquaculture and hydroponic system for El Heiz that
wherestudents share answers and aimed to create assignments and exams less susceptible to plagiarism.When faculty took a learner-centered approach to conscientiousness, they put in time and/oreffort to learn about their students’ interests, experiences, and lives; they used this information inplanning course activities and examples. For example, several faculty hired peer learningfacilitators—students who had just completed the course. Rather than simply asking thesestudents to grade, they sought their ideas in planning the course, situating the students as part ofthe instructional team. Such faculty also updated their course materials, but they put effort intoresearching authentic applications of course content and checking with peer learning
48 7.3 I do not plan to get a bachelor’s degree 2 0.3 Other 121 18.3ResultsAn important decision in exploratory factor analysis is specifying how many factors to extract. Indetermining the number of factors, we use parallel analysis and Velicer’s minimum averagepartial (MAP) test. Although these tests are less common than other popular methods todetermine the number of factors, such as the Kaiser’s eigenvalue > 1 rule [25], research showsthat the eigenvalue > 1 rule almost always overestimates the number of factors to extract [26].The methods we use in this study are
identified positive experiences, including providing help to find an internship,insight and encouragement. Other areas of help included providing support or a “steadying hand”to a struggling student, helping students identify goals and planning for the future, and strategiesfor how to succeed in challenging times. One mentor identified that a friendship had developedbetween themselves and the student. Three mentors identified that the student was not consistentor not responsive. As one commented, “I was not sure of how best to help as (the) student wasn’tsure what they wanted out of (the) program.”Fall mentors identified a few recommendations, including having students identify theirexpectations and goals and then revisit these items at each meeting
Projects: Students’ Perceptions of Time and TasksIntroductionTeam-based design projects are common in foundational engineering courses for many reasons.From a professional development perspective, team-based design projects offer studentsscaffolded apprenticeship with opportunities to engage in collaborative planning and work akinto that of the workforce. From a pedagogical perspective, they require students to think criticallyabout a wide range of engineering concepts and to complete a variety of practical tasks related tolearning objectives. Despite potential benefits, there are some formidable challenges—theoretical and methodological—to understanding how team-based projects shape individuals’ideas about
Joyce B. Main is Associate Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She received an Ed.M. in Administration, Planning, and Social Policy from the Harvard Graduate School of Education, and a Ph.D. degree in Learning, Teaching, and Social Policy from Cornell University. Dr. Main examines student academic pathways and transitions to the workforce in science and engineering. She was a recipi- ent of the 2014 American Society for Engineering Education Educational Research and Methods Division Apprentice Faculty Award, the 2015 Frontiers in Education Faculty Fellow Award, and the 2019 Betty Vetter Award for Research from WEPAN. In 2017, Dr. Main received a National Science Foundation CAREER award to examine
from this experience will allow us to understand thedifferent types of costs that influence the student’s decision to stay another year and completetheir master’s degree. Studies found that exposure to research at an undergraduate level createspositive experiences for students which as a result, leads engineering students to pursue theirgraduate studies [1], [15]. Moreover, social interactions with graduate students, mentors, as wellas professors, can play a role in the decision to pursue post-graduate degrees. Lastly, Abhyankaret al. studied the socializer influence on engineering students’ career planning, which revealedthat these different socializer categories influence students’ post-graduation plans in three areas:“thinking about
to practice systems thinking and apply the Vee-Model.The course deliverables listed in Table 2 includes: Project Plan and Journal (22.5%),Communication Skills (47.5%) and Technical Merit (30%). Students must take an ill-definedproblem to implement a proof-of-concept solution. A detailed description of the weeklydeliverables is given elsewhere and will not be described here due to space limitations. TheCritical Design Review (CDR) rubric was also developed to balance the course weightingbetween system-level thinking fostered by weekly deliverables and acquired technical skillsetsfrom the MSEE program. The weekly deliverables are guided by the Vee Model [9] [10] [11].Several years ago, the College of Engineering (COE) Master of Science in
, 76 percentof the single mothers are gainfully employed versus 85 percent for single fathers 10. When weconsider the standard of living for these households, single mothers and their children are twiceas likely to live in poverty as the general population. Low income students typically come fromnon-college- educated families and are potentially first-generation college students fromfamilies where neither parent had more than a high-school education11. These students tend toface a number of challenges, such as poor academic preparation in high school, inadequatefinances, deficient educational degree expectations and plans, a lack of appropriate role modelsor mentors, and a lack of support from peers or family members12. For low income