Paper ID #23808The Effectiveness of a Multi-year Engineering EnrichmentDr. Linda Hirsch, New Jersey Institute of Technology LINDA S. HIRSCH is the Assistant Director for Research, Evaluation and Program Operations for the Center for Pre-College programs at New Jersey Institute of Technology. Dr. Hirsch has a degree in educa- tional psychology with a specialty in Educational Statistics and Measurement from the Graduate School of Education at Rutgers University. She has been involved in all aspects of educational and psychological research for over 20 years. Dr. Hirsch has extensive experience conducting longitudinal research
, community engagement and research profile.Lisa Romkey, University of Toronto Lisa Romkey serves as Associate Professor, Teaching Stream and Associate Chair, Curriculum, Teaching and Learning with the Division of Engineering Science at the University of Toronto. In this position, Lisa plays a central role in the evaluation, design and delivery of a dynamic and complex curriculum, while facilitating the development and implementation of various teaching learning and assessment initiatives. Lisa teaches undergraduate courses in engineering & society, and graduate courses in engineering edu- cation. Her research interests include teaching and assessment practices in engineering. Lisa also serves as Associate Director for
Geotechnics. Prior to joining the doctoral program, Medha was teaching Computer Science and Information Science classes at an engineering institute in Bangalore, India. Her research interests include interdisciplinary design collaborations, hybrid/blended learning for engineering education and pedagogy of technology integration.Ieshya Anderson, Arizona State University Ieshya Anderson is Naak´etł’´ah´ı (Tohono O’odham), born for Tł’´aa´ shch´ı’´ı. Her cheii is Naak´etł’´ah´ı and her n´al´ı is T´od´ıch’´ıi’nii. Ieshya graduated from Arizona State University, Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering with a Bachelor of Science in Engineering, emphasis in electrical systems. She is pursuing her PhD in Engineering Education Systems
interventions designed to improve student persistence across all student groups. Perhapsthe most relevant finding in support of the research discussed in this paper is that increasing thefrequency of asking students to retrieve precalculus skills improves their retention acrosssubsequent semesters, better preparing them for courses later in their plans of study and tocomplete their engineering degrees [8]. It should be noted that while that study investigated thefrequency of retrieval in a precalculus course, it follows that incorporating space retrieval withinlater mathematics courses would benefit students.Considering the impact of calculus courses on retention and persistence within engineeringprograms, there is a clear need for intervention
factors that may be barriers for participation in volunteering for outreachevents; and 4) Questions that qualitatively assess the participant’s previous experiences andattitudes about outreach.Survey questions (Appendix A) were developed based on the context of our research objectivesand adapted from relevant literature to appropriately investigate each of the four sections. TheUniversity of New Mexico Institutional Review Board approved this study and assigned it theIRB number 2210020153.Section 1: Background on the Survey Taker has well-developed, standard best practices. [13] Weincluded demographic information to determine if gender identity, research center affiliations,degree program name, and degree program level impacted responses
learning." The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas 85.5 (2012): 192-196. 10. Jones, Susan R. and Kathleen Hill. "Crossing High Street: Understanding diversity through community service-learning." Journal of College Student Development 42.3 (2001): 204- 16. 11. Marullo, Sam. "Bringing home diversity: A service-learning approach to teaching race and ethnic relations." Teaching Sociology (1998): 259-275. 12. Seidman, Alan. "Minority student retention: Resources for practitioners." New directions for institutional research 2005.125 (2005): 7-24. Page 10 of 1113. Traum, M. J., et al.,“Engineering Design, Project Management, and Community
for the Center for Nanotechnology in Society at Arizona State University. Rider is a Research Collaborator with the Sustainability Science Education program at the Biodesign Institute. His research focuses on wicked problems that arise at the intersection of society and technology. Rider holds a Ph.D. in Sustainability from Arizona State University, and a Master’s de- gree in Environmental Management from Harvard University and a Bachelor’s degree in Environmental Science from University of New Hampshire. Before earning his doctorate, he has worked for a decade in consulting and emergency response for Triumvirate Environmental Inc.Rachel Sinclair, University of Virginia Rachel Sinclair is a graduate with a
-0002-5351-0341.5. Pintarič Z.N., Kravanja Z., 2020, The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic in 2020 on the Quality of STEM Higher Education, Chemical Engineering Transactions, 81, 1315-1320 DOI:10.3303/CET2081220.6. Vutukuru, M., "Faulty Assumptions About Lab Teaching During COVID," https://www.insidehighered.com/advice/2020/08/05/engineering-instructor-disagrees-notion-lab-courses- cant-be-taught-effectively.7. Thai, N.T.T.; De Wever, B.; Valcke, M. “The impact of a flipped classroom design on learning performance in higher education: Looking for the best ‘blend’ of lectures and guiding questions with feedback”, Comput. Educ. 2017, 107, 113–126.8. Zhang, Z., et al., "Teaching Power Electronics With a Design-Oriented
specialists had 89,500jobs in 2016, with 10-year job outlook of 11% growth; this is better than EnvE at 53,800 jobsand 8% growth rate [33, 34]. However, there are many more degree programs and graduates inEnvSci, increasing competition for those jobs. As well, EnvE graduates can often take EnvScijobs, should they choose to do so.Thus, previous research points to a variety of factors that impact students decisions about whichcollege majors they choose to enroll in, and factors that may impact their persistence. However,it is unclear the extent to which these factors are important to the pathways of students withinitially strong interests in both environmental issues and engineering. In particular, there is alack of strong information about persistence
relationships and dependencies withinthe university setting. This approach is not limited to predictive capabilities, as seen in traditionalmachine learning models; it also enables us to engage in objective “what-if” analyses. These anal-yses delve into counterfactual reasoning, allowing us to explore hypothetical scenarios and theirpotential impacts on student outcomes. We aim to utilize this model to better understand the causalrelationships between curriculum complexity and student performance metrics. By doing so, weaim to contribute a novel perspective to educational research discourse, offering theoretical insightsand practical implications for curriculum design and student success strategies. This study not onlyseeks to fill a critical gap in
- Business Security, Ch. 9, 2018. Taylor & Francis, CRC Group.[6] P. Kendeou, P. Broek, A. Helder, and J. Karlsson J, “A Cognitive View of Reading Comprehension: Implications for Reading Difficulties,” Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 29(1), pp. 10–16, 2014.[7] L. McGarrity, “What Sentiment Analysis Can Do for Your Brand?” Marketing Profs, April 2016. Available online: https://www.marketingprofs.com/opinions/2016/29673/what- sentiment-analysis-can-do-for-your-brand.[8] A. E. Barth, S. Vaughn, P. Capin, E. Cho, S. Stillman-Spisak, L. Martinez, and H. Kincaid, “Effects of a Text-processing Comprehension Intervention on Struggling Middle School Readers,” Topics in Language Disorders, 36(4), pp. 368-389, 2016.[9] E. M
Paper ID #30045The Modalities of Governance in Engineering EducationDr. Atsushi Akera, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Atsushi Akera is Associate Professor and Graduate Program Director in the Department of Science and Technology Studies at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (Troy, NY). He received his M.A. and Ph.D. in the History and Sociology of Science, University of Pennsylvania. His current research is on the history of engineering education reform in the United States (1945-present). He is a the current Chair of the ASEE Ad Hoc Committee on Interdivisional Cooperation; Chair of the International Network for
allows a gateway to improved learning andbroadening participation as engaging in SoTL requires faculty to think more critically as they adoptand disseminate research-based practices. However, the vast majority of disciplinary engineeringPhD programs (e.g., non-Engineering Education programs) do not prepare graduates for teachingand/or disseminating best teaching practices through the scholarship of teaching and learning(SoTL) [7]. As a result, the limited teaching preparedness of new college and universityengineering educators has the potential to turn students off from engineering [8], which directlyimpacts retention and completion rates [9].Several factors potentially contribute to this problem. First, most disciplinary engineering PhDprograms
Paper ID #32364Student Opinion on Teaching Thermodynamics Through Synchronous andAsynchronous Distance LearningMs. Tara Gupte Wilson, Wright State University Tara Wilson is a graduate student in Wright State University’s Biomedical Engineering program. She cur- rently works as a clinical researcher & data specialist for Kaleidoscope Innovation, an Infosys company. During her undergraduate career at The Ohio State University she spent four semesters as a teaching assistant for the Food, Agricultural, and Biological Engineering Department’s thermodynamics course. She was also a teaching assistant for OSU’s fundamentals
, educators havetried to design curricula that foster this associative learning —which, we know from our ownexperiences, is how we learn best outside of the classroom. Twenty-first century engineeringeducators have been mindful of ABET’s EC2000 student outcomes a-k, including ethicalunderstanding, the ability to communicate effectively, and “the broad education necessary tounderstand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, andsocietal context.”2 Engineering educators who struggle to help students achieve these ABETlearning outcomes might consider working together with liberal arts faculty to integrateengineering with humanities understanding. What the environmental historian William Crononwished for liberal arts
the first two years of its operations.These findings aim to highlight the impact and growth of this program to date, make data-drivenrecommendations for programmatic improvement, and provide best practices which can beapplied to similar programming for Hispanic and other minoritized groups in STEM andeducation more broadly.Program Description and ObjectivesSHPE’s Virtual Stem Labs (VSL) are grounded in the belief that all Hispanic pre-collegestudents can excel in STEM if they are provided access to the tools and resources that supporttheir progress toward a STEM degree regardless of where they are in their academic journey.VSL is a pre-college program that brings STEM concepts to hundreds of Hispanic and Latinx K-12 students with a variety of
and Biomedical Engineering at University of Tennessee Health Science Center (UTHSC) through the Joint Graduate Program in Biomedical Engineering at UM/UTHSC. Dr. Curry received B.S. and M.S. degrees in electrical engineering and Ph.D. in biomedical engineering from the University of Memphis. Her current research interests include cardiac and neural electrophysiology with applications in cardio- and neuro-modulation via implantable electrostimulation devices, computational modeling and visualiza- tion, and best practices in undergraduate engineering education. These efforts have been funded by the National Institutes of Health, National Science Foundation, and American Heart Association. Dr. Curry is a member of
. Ross, Florida International University Monique Ross, Assistant Professor in the School of Computing and Information Sciences and STEM Transformation Institute at Florida International University, designs research focused on broadening par- ticipation in computer science through the exploration of: 1) race, gender, and disciplinary identity; 2) discipline-based education research (with a focus on computer science and computer engineering courses) in order to inform pedagogical practices that garner interest and retain women (specifically Black and His- panic women) in computer-related engineering fields. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021
constituting changed power dynamics. To the extent that these officestend to be risk adverse and to focus on risk management [12], their guidance may limitopportunities to respond boldly and creatively to the new legal landscape.Based on the results of this work as described above and the research on best practices for HEFSprofessional development [13], we recommend that efforts to serve all students begin byaddressing the needs of the HEFS who impact student experiences: • Recognize and acknowledge that HEFS have a variety of intense feelings and opinions about legal changes. Our results show that some opinions are strongly held and that there are intense feelings about the changes as well. It is essential that those working with HEFS
provides additive manufacturing support for design courses, laboratory courses, and entrepreneur initiatives. This facility houses several different technology 3D printers that capable of printing parts from polymers, fibers, composites, and metals as well as 3D scanning and subtractive manufacturing equipment. His research focuses on machining and manufacturing with a specific concentration on the use of additive manufacturing processes for advanced materials. He emphasis on design for additive manufacturing (DfAM), topology optimization, lightweight applications, and finite element analysis in additive manufacturing processes. Dr. Vora extensively teaches the additive manufacturing technology through the dedicated
for art and design education in the stemconversation,” Art Education, pp. 41-47, Mar. 2012.[9] American Society for Engineering Education. “The green report- engineering education for achanging world,” 2010.[10] S. Ghanbari. “Learning across disciplines: A collective case study of two universityprograms that integrate the arts with stem,” International Journal of Education & the Arts, vol.16, no. 7, pp. 1-21, 2015.[11] E. Perignat and J. Katz-Buonincontro. “STEAM in practice and research: An integrativeliterature review,” Thinking Skills and Creativity, vol. 31, pp. 31-43, 2019.[12] S. Spuzic, R. Narayanan, K. Abhary, H. K. Adriansen, S. Pignata, F. Uzunovic, and X.Guang. “The synergy of creativity and critical thinking in engineering
training of mathematics teachers that is at the core of this problem. Since enrollment at UIC, Janet had dedicated her studies and research efforts on Mathematics Socialization and identity amongst pre-service elementary teachers, an effort at understanding the reasons for lack of interest in the subject with a view to proffer solution and engender/motivate interest amongst this group that will eventually reflect in their classroom practices. She is currently a Graduate Assistant with UIC Engage, a commu- nity focused project that provides help for less-privileged students from K-8 in mathematics, reading and writing. She continues to work as a substitute teacher occasionally to keep abreast with current practices
, others on sustainability, and still others on thescalability of firms.To address these challenges, the authors of this work propose a framework for aligning institutionalculture and entrepreneurial ambitions with program design. The process of constructive alignmentwill provide a better understanding of the current practices in engineering entrepreneurshipeducation and bring clarity to the diverse approaches used in pedagogy. By developing astandardized framework, educators and funders will be better equipped to evaluate and comparedifferent programs, ultimately leading to improved outcomes for both students and educators.Keywords:Entrepreneurship, Innovation, Canadian Education, Program Design, Constructive Alignment1. Introduction:Currently
• the sharing of best practices in the content, teaching, certifications, articulation and career pathways for renewable energy technicians among participants and with their international peers • the use of an online learning collaborative site for knowledge-building activities and to share and disseminate curricula and other learning materialsGermany in particular presented an interesting case. The German Energiewende – or “energytransition” – is an on-going, nationally coordinated, comprehensive undertaking that has twofundamental drivers: the development and deployment of renewable energy sources and anincreased and widespread implementation of energy efficiency measures, all of which isoccurring in a relatively
mechanics researcher in Paris, France before returning to MIT as Assistant Director of Admissions. Currently Dr. Wendell works as a Senior Lecturer in MIT’s Department of Mechanical Engineering teaching design, manufacturing, and instrumentation.Dr. Andrea S. Walsh, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Andrea Walsh is a historical sociologist who specializes in the fields of women’s and gender studies, rhetoric and communication and visual media. She teaches at Massachusetts Institute of Technology in the programs in Women’s and Gender Studies and Writing and Comparative Media Studies. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Getting to Gender Parity in a Top-Tier
“effective” practice is considered to be one that supports and better preparesstudents, especially those designated as URM, to score higher on these “objective” measures[11]–[14]. Less dialogue has invited instructors and administrators within higher education torethink whether these instruments, the measures themselves, may be imperfect and biased. Whilegrades have a strong place in the logistics and culture of higher education in the United states(see Appendix A and B for information on American grading practices), now is the time toconsider their flaws and limitations, as well as explore new grading practices that may reducetheir inequitable impact on students who are already marginalized in STEM disciplines.In this paper, I argue that the very
interdisciplinary experience of the authors and avoid creating silos within differentsections of the course.Future WorkWe argue that CSPs are a promising area for enhancing engineering education and we lookforward to investigating these methods. Future work will focus on identifying appropriateexamples for teaching energy concepts through CSP, developing and offering the course, andmeasuring the impact of CSP on student learning. One of our major challenges will bedetermining how the examples identified in this research can best be integrated to achieve ourdesired learning outcomes. We anticipate that we will need to overcome our own biases aboutwhat counts as engineering and that by working as a group we can collectively broaden our owndefinitions of
focused research remains a priority [9].Wright College, an urban Hispanic Serving open-access community college within the CityColleges of Chicago (CCC) system, understands and appreciates the opportunity and need todevelop equitable frameworks that are focused on access and excellence. In the past eight years,Wright College and CCC have adopted many of the best practices to improve student access andsuccess. Wright College prioritized equity work and inclusive excellence, by integrating diversityand equity within mission and operations [10]. These efforts set the foundation for an innovativeengineering transfer program. Through NSF-HSI funded research, Wright College found successin developing aspiring engineers and computer scientists. Diverse
provides training for fortune 500 companies throughout the world. Page 26.372.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Comparing Engineering and Non-Engineering International Programs to Determine Value and Future DirectionsIntroductionInternational programs are a common approach to achieving a variety of global competency-related learning outcomes [1]. Such programs are generally designed to meet lofty goals such asproviding an in-depth understanding of people and their culture in such a way that disciplinespecific practices are compared and contrasted, personal
recognition of the importance of diversity and inclusion in engineering education hasgrown in recent years [1], little is known about the best practices for supporting neurodiversestudents [2-3]. It has been suggested that neurodiverse students benefit from course assessmentsthat allow for a more flexible mode of expressing knowledge [3]. However, evidence forimproved learning outcomes on different types of course assessments is largely anecdotal.Characteristics associated with different forms of neurodiversity, such as attention deficithyperactivity disorder (ADHD), autism spectrum, depression, and anxiety, are suggested to benormally distributed in the population [2]. Indeed, research suggests that these conditions arebest conceptualized as