to science and engineering communication studies 17,18, 19 and a plethora of advice from scientists and communication scholars about how to write forthe public20. Despite this interest, few university science or engineering programs dedicateformal coursework in public communication to undergraduate or graduate students 21. Whenprograms do offer such training, they are usually limited to teaching students to write intraditional genres such as press releases, newspaper-style articles, and essays13, 14, and fail toconsider more personal, informal, and affective forms of communication such as face-to-faceconversations that can occur through science cafes or street science 22, 23 or to make use ofmultimedia genres such as podcasts, blogs, or
higher education and improve learning outcomes. Her research to date has focused on educational designs that emphasize learner ini- tiative and agency through inquiry or problem-based learning in formal and informal learning contexts. She has published several papers on the characteristics of learning environments that support or constrain opportunities for any students (including those from non-dominant backgrounds) to participate in key science and engineering process skills such as scientific argumentation. Her work is largely informed by the principles and perspectives on human development and cognition articulated by Cultural Historical Activity Theory. Putting theory into practice, she teaches a service-learning
teaching career by teaching several labs as a graduate teaching assistant and later on as an adjunct faculty. While at Towson University, he also cultivated good friendships with his advisors and now mentors: Dr. Rajeswari M. Kolagani and Dr. David Schaefer. His research led to his first publication a few years later. Forced by destiny, he ended up at Norfolk State University where he is now pursuing a PhD degree in Material Science focusing on optical characterization of materials for energy harvesting. Through the IGERT fellowship, he is pursuing his ultimate goal of becoming a professor and intends to carry on research in optical materials. - See more at: https://www.asee.org/public/person#sthash.lcrL5s3P.dpufMr. IRVING
Paper ID #22182Valuing Women’s Contributions: Team Projects and Collaborative WritingDr. Jennifer C Mallette, Boise State University An Assistant Professor of English at Boise State University, Dr. Jenn Mallette teaches technical com- munication at the undergraduate and graduate level. In addition to working with STEM students in her undergraduate technical communication course, she collaborates with faculty in the College of Engineer- ing to focus on enhancing writing education in engineering courses. Her other research focuses on women in engineering, and she has recently published on the results of a case study exploring
Paper ID #30830Examining the Effects of STEM Climate on the Mental Health of GraduateWomen from Diverse Racial/Ethnic BackgroundsMs. Amanda C Arnold, Arizona State UniversityDr. Kerrie G Wilkins-Yel, University of Massachusetts Boston Dr. Kerrie G. Wilkins-Yel is an assistant professor of counseling psychology at the University of Mas- sachusetts Boston. She examines the psychological science of environmental agents that influence persis- tence intentions among women, particularly women of color, in STEM.Dr. Jennifer M Bekki, Arizona State University She teaches courses in the engineering and manufacturing engineering
laboratory projects in the middle years [27]–[29].Engineering teams offer a mode for interdisciplinarity and task delegation so students can finishlarge and complicated projects within the span of a course. What is not often taught, however,are the various skills necessary in the social processes that make teaming effective:communication, delegation, and conflict resolution, to name a few [30]–[32]. The socialcircumstances in which these skills become relevant can reveal hidden epistemologies that guidethe teaming process, especially when gender differences and dynamics are considered [21].Within engineering, these epistemologies are woven into the culture of engineering learningenvironments and often the engineering field itself [18]. Therefore, we
Paper ID #44028Considering Professional Diversity as a Factor in a Consensus Building Methodfor Expert Crowdsourcing of Curriculum TopicsMr. Brian Khoa Ngac, George Mason University Brian K. Ngac is an Instructional Faculty Member and Dean’s Teaching Fellow at George Mason University’s School of Business. Moreover, he is a PhD Candidate (ABD) at George Mason University’s College of Engineering & Computing. He holds 12 internationally recognized cyber security and management certifications including the C|CISO, CISSP, ISSMP, CISM, and PMP. His areas of expertise are in cyber security, digital engineering (RDT&E), and
. Additionally, he holds a professional educator license for secondary education in Technology and Engineering Education in Illinois.Mr. Robin Jephthah Rajarathinam, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Robin Jephthah Rajarathinam is a Ph.D. candidate in the department of Curriculum and Instruction, DELTA program, UIUC. His research focuses on Collaborative Learning, Learning Analytics, and Human-Centered Design within STEM disciplines. His background is in mechanical engineering and education.Yang Victoria Shao, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Yang V. Shao is a teaching assistant professor in electrical and computer engineering department at University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (UIUC). She earned her Ph.D. degrees
students into engineeringprograms. Hoit and Ohland showed, with statistically significant evidence, that presenting the realengineering content, in the first-year itself, helps retain women students31. They changed theintroduction to engineering course to a laboratory format, where they employed active learningwith smaller class sizes, and rotated students through laboratories in each undergraduateengineering department. They studied three different cohorts, wherein students could chooseeither the new laboratory format, which 42 women students did; or traditional lecture basedformat, which 92 women students did. The authors found women retention (remaining in theprogram till the third year of study) in the lecture-based format was at 16
participants’ return to the U.S., follow-on projects were offered to leverage their newly formed professional and personal network.Over the lifetime of the grant, the program supported a total of 18 undergraduate and graduatestudent research projects in 10 Korean host laboratories at Seoul National University, KAIST,Korea Electrotechnology Research Institute, and CJ Group. Despite challenges posed by COVID-19 that led to two no-cost extensions, every cohort in the program traveled to Korea and was ableto have an immersive experience. The participants were diverse in ethnicity (3 African Americans,1 Native American, and 4 Hispanics) and gender (7 female students). The program has catalyzedcontinuing and new collaborations in the smart systems field
learning skills and behaviors.Dr. Brian P. Self, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Brian Self obtained his B.S. and M.S. degrees in Engineering Mechanics from Virginia Tech, and his Ph.D. in Bioengineering from the University of Utah. He worked in the Air Force Research Laboratories before teaching at the U.S. Air Force Academy for seven years. Brian has taught in the Mechanical Engineering c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Paper ID #21724 Department at Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo since 2006. During the 2011-2012 academic year he participated in a professor
Materials Science & Engineering from Boise State in 2014. In the Spring of 2016, Ann was recognized as part of the first cohort of University Innovation Fellows at Boise State, and has worked as a Fellow to collect and incorporate student feedback into future plans for makerspaces on the Boise State campus. As an undergraduate and graduate student, she has been involved with the Society of Women Engineers, and also taught a materials science laboratory course as a graduate teaching assis- tant. She has volunteered at numerous STEM outreach activities on and off of the Boise State campus throughout her time as a student and is passionate about increasing diversity in STEM and helping girls and women to
University of Dayton (2003) and a Ph.D. in Engineering Edu- cation from Purdue University (2008). Her research focuses on strategies for design innovations through divergent and convergent thinking as well as through deep needs and community assessments using design ethnography, and translating those strategies to design tools and education. She teaches design and en- trepreneurship courses at the undergraduate and graduate levels, focusing on front-end design processes.Ms. Erika Mosyjowski, University of Michigan Erika Mosyjowski is a PhD student in the Center for the Study of Higher and Postsecondary Education at the University of Michigan. She also earned a Master’s in Higher Education at Michigan and a Bachelor’s in
Accounting from the Universidad Aut´onoma de Baja California (UABC) in Mexico. She has over 5 years of experience as a Financial Auditor for the Mexican Congress. She has had the opportunity to participate as part of the PROMISE community to enhance the preparation of graduate and postdoctoral fellows in STEM. Her research interests focus on bridging the disparity of availability of information that improves programs that enforce participation in STEM careers.Miss Amanda Lo, University of Maryland, Baltimore County I am a current Master’s student in the Biological Sciences Department of the University of Maryland, Baltimore County. I work in Dr. Jeff Leips’ research laboratory where I spend my time researching about
the program. There must be a suf- ficient number of faculty and they must have sufficient responsibility and authority to improve and implement the program.7. Facilities All facilities (classrooms, offices, laboratories, and associated equipment) must be adequate to support the attainment of the student outcomes. Modern tools, equip- ment and resources must be available to the students, and they must be systemati- cally maintained and upgraded.8. Institutional Institutional support and leadership must be adequate to ensure the continuity of the Support program. Institutional resources provided to the program must be
methodologies.Ms. AVA Butler, Oregon State University Ava is a sophomore in mechanical engineering at Oregon State University. She is a well regarded trans- gender activist & leftist organizer in Corvallis, Oregon. Her research is in water desalinization in low infrastructure areas.Ms. Naya Selene Pelzl, Naya is a member of the greater Oregon State University community. She is currently taking a leave of absence from her undergraduate program. She has completed three years of undergraduate studies towards a B.S. in Computer Science.Michelle Kay Bothwell, Oregon State University Michelle Bothwell is an Associate Professor of Bioengineering at Oregon State University. Her teaching and research bridge ethics, social
Paper ID #41273Exploring Engineering Graduate Students’ Perceptions of Creativity in Academicand Research EnvironmentsAutumn R. Deitrick, Pennsylvania State University Autumn Deitrick is a graduate student in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at The Pennsylvania State University (Penn State). She is working under Dr. Catherine Berdanier in the Engineering Cognitive Research Laboratory (ECRL) studying creativity in graduate-level engineering education. She earned her B.S. in Civil Engineering from Penn State and her S.M. in Civil and Environmental Engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology
research methods such as (ethnographic observations, interviews, analysis ofartifacts and sometimes protocol analysis), these methods are always used to iteratively constructthe emerging design, which itself simultaneously constitutes and elicits the research results...” (p.164).In our research project, we sought to understand how best to design initiatives with a particularfocus on understanding what sites should be focused on (classrooms? Laboratories? Officehours? Gathering spaces?) and what populations to engage (TAs? Faculty? Staff? Otherstudents?). These narrow design parameters were used to elicit narratives and stories about bothpositive and negative experiences, or as the researchers put it to the participants, places whereand people who
computer science and engineering by diversifying stereotypes,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 6, 2015.19. J. G. Strout, N. Dasgupta, M. Hunsinger, and M. A. McManus, “STEMing the tide: Using ingroup experts to inoculate women’s self-concept in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM),” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 100, no. 2, pp. 255-270, 2011. doi: 10.1037/a002138520. R. R. Essig, B. Elahi, J. L. Hunter, A. Mohammadpour, and K. W. O'Connor, “Future girls of STEM summer camp pilot: Teaching girls about engineering and leadership through hands-on activities and mentorship,” Journal of STEM Outreach, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1-9, 2020. https://doi.org/10.15695/jstem/v3i1.0921. Y. K. Hoh, “Using
STEM can participate in a collaborative research environment abroadthrough the IRES Track I program (IRES Sites). In most cases, the overseas host institution isanother research university or a laboratory that can supply expert guidance in the student'schosen IRES fields. The IRES Track II (Advanced Studies Institute) program is a brief (15-21days) yet intensive course designed specifically for graduate students. This is more narrowlyaimed at cutting-edge research, and the engagement of eminent scholars in the relevant field isrequired to justify the choice of a foreign location.This paper discusses how international research benefits engineering students. The projectevaluation results showing how this experience has improved students
persistence and retention of low-income engineering transfer students.Dr. David A. Copp, University of California, Irvine David A. Copp received the B.S. degree in mechanical engineering from the University of Arizona and the M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in mechanical engineering from the University of California, Santa Barbara. He is currently an Assistant Professor of Teaching at the University of California, Irvine in the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering. Prior to joining UCI, he was a Senior Member of the Technical Staff at Sandia National Laboratories and an adjunct faculty member in Electrical and Computer Engi- neering at the University of New Mexico. His broad research interests include engineering
Paper ID #33821Global Engineering Competencies Learned Through Virtual Exchange ProjectCollaborationDr. Deborah Walter, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Dr. Deborah Walter is an Associate Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. Her areas of expertise include design, and medical imaging. She started college at the University of Maryland (UMD) in College Park. After receiving her PhD at the Pennsylvania State University, she went to work for GE at the Global Research Center. She was in the Computed Tomography laboratory where she helped to design new x-ray CT systems for
. Kevin P. Arnett P.E., United States Military Academy LTC Kevin Arnett is a fifth year Assistant Professor at the US Military Academy. He received his B.S. in Civil Engineering from USMA in 2001, his M.S. Civil Engineering from U.C. Berkeley in 2011, and his PhD in Structural Engineering from UCSD in 2019. He teaches structural analysis and design of steel structures, and is a licensed Professional Engineer in California and Missouri.Dr. Michael Gerhardt Oesterle, Naval Facilities Engineering and Expeditionary Warfare Center Michael Oesterle is a research structural engineer and the division director for the Capital Improvements Explosion Effects and Consequences (EE&C) Division at the Naval Facilities Command
student is in autonomous vehi- cles, engineering education, and aviation technology. His thesis topic focuses on conducting engineering analysis of semi-autonomous trailer connections.Miss Emily Rada, Purdue University, West Lafayette Emily Rada is a master’s Engineering Technology student at Purdue University, studying predictive main- tenance in turbine generators. She graduated in May 2019 with a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering Tech- nology from Purdue University, concentrating on power generation and fuel sources.Dr. Anne M. Lucietto, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. Lucietto has focused her research in engineering technology education and the understanding of engineering technology students. She teaches in an
LUT with main research interests re- lated to technology and society, gender diversity and engineering education.Dr. Hanna Niemel¨a, Hanna Niemel¨a received the M.A. and PhD degrees in translation studies from University of Helsinki in 1993 and 2003, respectively. She is currently working as an associate professor with the Department of Electrical Engineering at Lappeenranta-Lahti University of Technology, Lappeenranta, Finland. Her professional experience ranges from translating to teaching and language consulting. Her interests include electrical engineering, scientific writing and special languages. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020
Analyst, and were spent working on astrophysics research, astronomical data analysis, and space-based instrumentation characterization, calibration, and experimen- tation. While at STScI I focused the majority of my efforts as a member of the development team for the Hubble Legacy Archive (HLA), as a member of the Cosmic Origins Spectrograph (COS) pipeline and calibration teams, and as a member of the Operations Detector Laboratory (ODL), where I worked on the characterization of spaced-based CCD detectors. Now at UNC Charlotte, I have found new passion in the education, advising, and mentoring of undergraduate engineering students.Mrs. Meg Harkins, University of North Carolina at Charlotte Meg Harkins is an Associate
healthy and aging brain, as well as coupled multi-field formulations for the spread of neurodegenerative diseases, such as in Alzheimer’s disease and chronic traumatic encephalopa- thy. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Running A Virtual Summer Undergraduate Research Program: Lessons learned Johannes Weickenmeier Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken NJAbstractUndergraduate research is a fundamental part of the research activities in most laboratories atinstitutions of higher education. Undergraduate students serve a wide range of functions andperform critical
(NSF) grants CCF-0939370, and OAC-2005632, by the Foundation for Food andAgriculture Research (FFAR) grant 534662, by the National Institute of Food and Agriculture(NIFA) grants 2019-67032-29077 and 2020- 70003-32299, by the Society of Actuaries grant19111857, by Cummins Inc. grant 20067847, by Sandia National Laboratories grant 2207382, andby Gro Master. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions, or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the funding agencies.References[1] S. Hurtado, R. M. Gonyea, P. A. Graham, and K. Fosnacht, “The relationship between residential learning communities and student engagement,” 2019.[2] C. Ujj, “Impact of Living-Learning Communities on
involvement with individuals and groups outside normalclassroom and laboratory activities. The five Latina participants named their families andcampus organizations focused on women in engineering as important sources of support as theypursued their education. Further, this study found that Latinas in engineering encounter tensionbetween their engineering identities and other identities such as their gender and racial/ethnicidentities. By understanding the process of professional identity development and its interactionswith other personal identities, researchers, practitioners, and administrators may develop supportmechanisms that provide a holistic approach to supporting the present and future success ofLatina engineering students.LATINAS
, Tampa, FL. Since 2007, she has been the director of the Virtual Manufacturing and Design Laboratory for Medical Devices (VirtualMD Lab). Her research interests include computational geometry, machine learning, data mining, product design, and engineering education with applications in healthcare, medical image processing, computer-aided decision support systems, and medical device design. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 The Impact of Healthcare-Related Workshops on Student Motivation and Retention in Engineering Grisselle Centeno, Susana Lai-Yuen, Iman Nekooeimehr, Sharmin Mithy, Clarissa Arriaga, Carolina Giron