Walton-Macaulay, Saint Martin’s University With degrees in both Bachelor of Science and Master of Science from the University of Arkansas, and a doctoral degree from the University of Kentucky, Dr. Corrie Walton-Macaulay is a Geotechnical Engineering Associate Professor in the Civil Engineering department at St. Martin’s University, where he has been part of the faculty since 2019. Dr. Walton-Macaulay has extensive experience in the geotechnical and materials industry prior to becoming an academician and is a licensed professional engineer. Dr. Walton-Macaulay’s has a passion to teach, to educate upcoming civil engineers in best practices and for them to look to alternative ways and new technology that will improve on
straightforward, andfiltering options offered the advantage of accessing disaggregated data of interest. However,without a data dictionary and consultation with representatives from the institutions' data offices,navigating these datasets could prove more challenging.Table 1: Institution 1 Enrollment Data 2023-24 2022-23 2021-22 2020-21 2019-20 2018-19 Fall 1 320 322 318 291 271 232 2 2679 2645 2628 2530 2388 2168 3 11.94 12.17 12.10 11.50 11.35 10.70 Spring 1 324 315 296 248
70 90 115 130 150 Licensed & Copyright 2019 Mitchell R. Hammer, Ph.D. 97 Figure 1: Intercultural Development Continuum and IDI ScoresQuantitative Data AnalysisIDI datasets of student that completed the HE minor were selected from a broader IDI dataset.Quantitative analysis was conducted to detect changes intercultural competence, specificallyevaluating if shifts from orientations within Monocultural Mindset to Intercultural Mindsetutilizing the Intercultural Development Inventory IDI scores that were generated via the
careers: leaky pipeline or gender filter?,” Gend. Educ., vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 369–386, Oct. 2005, doi: 10.1080/09540250500145072.[8] R. Van Veelen, B. Derks, and M. D. Endedijk, “Double Trouble: How Being Outnumbered and Negatively Stereotyped Threatens Career Outcomes of Women in STEM,” Front. Psychol., vol. 10, p. 150, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00150.[9] W. C. Lee and H. M. Matusovich, “A Model of Co-Curricular Support for Undergraduate Engineering Students: Model of Co-Curricular Support,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 105, no. 3, pp. 406–430, Jul. 2016, doi: 10.1002/jee.20123.[10] D. Bilimoria and L. Xiangfen, “Effective practices to increase women’s participation, advancement and leadership in US
Pi, and Phi Kappa Phi honor societies. He is a life member of SHPE and SACNAS, and Senior Member of IEEE. He is a member of ASEE, and AGU.Michelle Klein, Electrical and Computer Engineering Dept. Heads Assoc.Prof. Truong Nguyen, University of California, San Diego Truong Nguyen is a Distinguished Professor at UCSD. His current research interests are video processing and machine learning algorithms with applications in health monitoring/diagnosis and 3D modeling. He received the IEEE Signal Processing Paper AwardProf. Petru Andrei, Florida A&M University; Florida State University Dr. Petru Andrei is Professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the Florida A&M University and Florida Stat
. Before joining UC Davis, he was a career-track Assistant Professor at Washington State University (WSU). Dr. Wang is the recipient of the 2024 ASEE-PSW Section Outstanding Early Career Teaching Award, 2023 UC Davis Biomedical Engineering Excellence in Teaching Award, and 2022 WSU Reid Miller Teaching Excellence Award.Vincent Tran, University of California, Davis Vincent Tran is the program coordinator for the NeuralStorm program at the University of California, Davis.Gabriela Lee, University of California, Davis Gabriela Lee, MS, MBA is the Associate Director of the Center for Neuroengineering and Medicine at UC Davis. In this role, she works with faculty and students from 18 departments to facilitate programming
/dci-arrangement/ms-ets1-engineering-design (accessed April 8, 2021).[31] Allen D, Tanner K. Infusing active learning into the large-enrollment biology class: seven strategies, from the simple to complex. Cell Biol Educ 2005;4:262–8. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.05-08-0113.[32] Carlsen R. Effectiveness of Incorporating Inquiry-Based Learning into Pre-Laboratory Exercises. 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, ASEE Conferences; 2017. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--28206.[33] Brame CJ. Active Learning. Science Teaching Essentials, Elsevier; 2019, p. 61–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-814702-3.00004-4.[34] Haak DC, HilleRisLambers J, Pitre E, Freeman S. Increased structure and active learning
U.S. Science and Engineering 2020,” Natl. Sci. Board Sci. Eng. Indic., 2020.[2] M. Ong, N. Jaumot-Pascual, and L. T. Ko, “Research literature on women of color in undergraduate engineering education: A systematic thematic synthesis,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 109, no. 3, pp. 581–615, 2020, doi: 10.1002/jee.20345.[3] K. Hamrick, “National Science Foundation Statistics on Women, Minorities and Persons with Disabilities in Science & Engineering,” Natl. Sci. Found., 2019.[4] M. Jarvie-Eggart, A. Singer, and J. Mathews, “Parent and Family Influence on First-year Engineering Major Choice,” 2020 ASEE Virtual Annu. Conf. Content Access Proc., 2020.[5] J. Roy, “Engineering by the numbers,” Am. Soc. Eng. Educ., 2020.[6
-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. Her current research interests include professional development for K-12 science teachers; factors influencing student career interests; diversity, inclusion, and equity in STEM; and student identity development. She graduated from Florida International University with a Ph.D. in Physics. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Using Topological Data Analysis in Social Science Research: Unpacking Decisions and Opportunities for a New MethodAbstractThis research paper describes a new statistical method for engineering education, Topological DataAnalysis (TDA), and considers the important decisions made during analysis and their impact onthe
consulting with nonprofits, museums, and summer programs. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Creation of an Engineering Epistemic Frame for K-12 Students (Fundamental)AbstractIn implementation of K-12 engineering education standards, in addition to the professionaldevelopment teachers need to be trained to prepare students for future engineering careers,assessments must evolve to reflect the various aspects of engineering. A previous researchproject investigated documentation methods using a variety of media with rising high schooljuniors in a summer session of a college preparatory program [1]. That study revealed thatalthough students had design
research focus relates to STEM career pathways (K-12 through early career) and conceptual understanding of core engineering principles. She is currently a Member-at-Large for the Pre-college Division of ASEE. Dr. Carrico’s consulting company specializes in research evaluations and industry consulting. Dr. Carrico received her B.S. in chemical engineering from Virginia Tech, Masters of Engineering from North Carolina State University, MBA from King University, and PhD in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech. Dr. Carrico is a certified project management professional (PMP) and licensed professional engineer (P.E.).Dr. Holly M. Matusovich, Virginia Tech Dr. Matusovich is an Associate Professor in Virginia Tech’s
ofChange: Combining Social Inclusion in the Professional Development of Electrical andComputer Engineering Students,” Systemic Practice & Action Research, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 237–245, Jun. 2011, doi: 10.1007/s11213-010-9183-3.[3] ABET, “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2021 - 2022,” Accreditation Boardfor Engineering and Technology. Accessed: Jan. 29, 2024. [Online]. Available:https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2021-2022/[4] M. Cote and A. Branzan Albu, “Teaching socio-cultural impacts of technology in advancedtechnical courses: a case study,” European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 44, no. 5, pp.688–701, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.1080/03043797.2018.1551329.[5
, 2019.[8] E. A. Adams and M. B. Burgoyne, "Integrating Humanitarian Engineering Design Projects to Increase Retention of Underrepresented Minority Students and to Achieve Interpersonal Skill- Related Learning Outcomes," in 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio, 2017.[9] K. C. Mittag and S. Taylor, "Activities for Students: As the Ball Rolls: A Quadratic Investigation Using Multiple Representations," The Mathematics Teacher, vol. 103, no. 1, pp. 62-68, 2009.[10] B. E. Peterson, P. Averbeck and L. Baker, "Sine curves and spaghetti," The Mathematics Teacher, vol. 91, no. 7, pp. 564-566, 1998.[11] S. A. Johnson and A. Thomas, "Exchange: Using Squishy Circut Technology in the Classroom," in 2011 ASEE Ammia
disadvantage backgrounds and underrepresented populations. He is a board member of the Inclusive Engineering Consortium and is actively engaged in initiatives that promote diversity equity and inclusion in engineering education. He has held faculty research-internship positions with Air Force Research Laboratories, and NASA Goddard Space Flight Center. Furthermore, he is a member of the Eta Kappa Nu, Sigma Xi, Tau Beta Pi, and Phi Kappa Phi honor societies. He is a life member of SHPE and SACNAS, and Senior Member of IEEE. He is a member of ASEE, and AGU.Dr. Barry J. Sullivan, Electrical & Computer Engineering Department Heads Assn Barry J. Sullivan is Director of Program Development for the Inclusive Engineering Consortium
. and Colorado Springs, Colo.). She joined the faculty at Boise State as an Assistant Professor in Mechanical Engineering in August of 2000. Along with Dr. Bill Knowlton, Moll founded the Materials Science and Engineering Program at BSU and served as the first chair. From 2011 to 2017, she was Dean of the College of Engineering. Her research interests include engineering education and microelectronic packaging, particularly 3-D integration and ceramic MEMS devices. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Voices of our students: Using evidence-based methods to inform a multidisciplinary engineering program designAbstractListening carefully to our students and
programs. Dr. Weese has been a highly active member in advocating for computer science ed- ucation in Kansas including PK-12 model standards in 2019 with an implementation guide the following year. Work on CS teacher endorsement standards are also being developed. Dr. Weese has developed, organized and led activities for several outreach programs for K-12 impacting well more than 4,000 stu- dents.Mr. Salah Alfailakawi, Kansas State University Salah Alfailakawi is a PhD student in Educational Technology (ET) Graduate Programs at Kansas State University’s College of Education. His areas of interest include social/cultural issues in ET, the impact of ET on learners and teachers, as well as pract
contributing to this lucrative profession [1],[3], [12]. There is limited research to indicate how CSE affects female students and theirdecision to major in engineering, and how CSE predicts the retention of women engineeringstudents in the major. This study sought to further investigate CSE of undergraduate womenengineering students, and how their beliefs about creativity and their lived experiencesinfluenced them to choose and succeed in engineering as a major. Industry Needs The need for architecture and engineering occupations is expected to increase 3% overthe ten-year span from 2019-2029, during which approximately 74,800 new jobs are projected tobe added, predominantly in engineering [13]. Notably
, Hulleman, Phelps, &Lee, 2019)—this is especially true for underrepresented and minoritized groups in STEM(Harackiewicz, Canning, Tibbetts, Priniski, & Hyde, 2016).We also concentrate on expectancy for success because literature states that when students believethey can succeed they are also more likely to stay motivated (Eccles & Wigfield, 2002). This effecthas been observed specifically within engineering (e.g., (Jones, Epler, Parastou, Bryant, & Paretti,2013; Jones et al., 2010; Matusovich, Streveler, Loshbaugh, Miller, & Olds, 2008; Matusovich,2008)), and so it seems important to examine the ways UVIs might be able to promote studentmotivation here. By helping students explicate the personal usefulness of a given topic or
and their retention over time is represented in the table below: N 2nd Fall 3rd Fall 4th Fall 5th Fall 6th Fall Retention Retention Retention Retention Retention % N % N % N % N % N 2014 28 93% 26 79% 22 64% 19 57% 16 46% 13 2015 30 93% 28 80% 24 80% 24 73% 22 2016 50 90% 45 70% 35 66% 33 2017 43 91% 39 84% 36 2018 42 98% 41 2019 43 TOTAL 208 179 117 76 38 13 AVERAGE
leadership teams navigate power and privilege within their teams.A Year Later, the Revised Workshop (2019). After another year of learning about power andprivilege and reflecting on our previous workshop, we implemented a revised workshop at the2019 annual NSF RED Consortium Meeting. The 2019 workshop is very similar to the workshopthat is provided in the appendix and described earlier in this design case. Early in the workshop,a participant complimented us as being inclusive by providing a few copies of the handout inlarge print, something Nadia had suggested because she had been involved in a workshop inwhich a participant could not participate because they had forgotten reading glasses.At this workshop, we completely revamped our workshop with
. Her research has been published in several premier journals, including the Journal of Educational Psychology, Journal of Higher Education, and Race, Ethnicity, and Education. She is a contributing author to several books published by Oxford University Press and University of California Press. She served as President for the Korean American Educational Researchers Association, including President in 2013-2014, and Chair of the KAERA Board of Directors in 2019-2020.Dr. Jerry Lynn Dahlberg Jr, University of Tennessee, Space Institute Jerry Dahlberg is the Director of Research at the University of Tennessee Space Institute. Prior to joining UTSI, he was an Assistant Teaching Professor and Senior Design Committee Chair
students and practitioners are addressing global inequality and the SDGs in career pathways, especially now, when activists are calling for the development sector to implement decolonized and anti-racist structures. Emma graduated from the California Polytechnic with a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering in 2019 and an M.S. in Irrigation Engineering in 2020.Prof. Amy Javernick-Will, University of Colorado Boulder Amy Javernick-Will is a Professor at the University of Colorado, Boulder in the Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering Department. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 avigating Transformational Resistance: Exploring Humanitarian Engineering N Students
Ecology & Evolution, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 3–6, 2019. [3] E. Seymour and N. M. Hewitt, Talking about leaving. Westview Press, Boulder, CO, 1997, vol. 34. [4] B. E. Lovitts, Leaving the ivory tower: The causes and consequences of departure from doctoral study. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2002. [5] H. B. Carlone and A. Johnson, “Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens,” Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, vol. 44, no. 8, pp. 1187–1218, 2007. [6] Z. Hazari, G. Sonnert, P. M. Sadler, and M.-C. Shanahan, “Connecting high school physics experiences, outcome expectations
Paper ID #25696Supervising Undergraduate Cybersecurity ProjectsProf. Aaron Carpenter, Wentworth Institute of Technology Professor Carpenter is an Assistant Professor at the Wentworth Institute of Technology. In 2012, he completed his PhD at the University of Rochester, and now focuses his efforts to further the areas of computer architecture, digital systems, cybersecurity, and computer engineering education.Prof. Raymond A. Hansen, Wentworth Institute of Technology c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Supervising Undergraduate Cybersecurity Projects Aaron
% 9% 9% 9% 9% 22% 10% 17% 19% 19% 21% 20% 13% 16% 15% 17% 16% 0 Year 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Domestic Men 1018 968 1005 1028 1160 1213 1160 1106 1002 1195 1179 International Men 1475 1702 1830 1890 2098 2116 2658 2703 2990 3043 3218 Domestic Women 331 324
. Page - 2 For instance, the initial question we developed was “Can we use available institutional data toidentify differences in pass rates between student subgroups and can we predict time to declare successfor these different groups?”. We hypothesized there would be no detectable differences, and found wedisproved that null theory. For academic years 2015-16, 2016-17, 2017-18, 2018-19, and 2019-20, 3,286frosh students came to the concerned Californian university to study engineering. Of that entire group,2,514 (77%) were able to successfully meet course requirements and declare engineering major by theend of their second year. However, of the 539 URM students and the same 5-year period, only 332 (62%)met course requirements and
, pp. 1–7, 2013.[2] S. Provasnik, A. KewalRamani, M. McLaughlin Coleman, L. Gilbertson, W. Herring, and Q. Xie, “Status of Education in Rural America,” Washington, DC, 2007.[3] J. J. Versypt and A. N. Ford Versypt, “Mapping Rural Students ’ STEM Involvement : Case Studies of Chemical En- gineering Undergraduate Enrollment in the States of Illinois and Kansas Mapping Rural Students ’ STEM Involvement : Case Studies of Chemical Engineering Undergraduate Enrollment in t,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2013.[4] L. Zahedi, M. Ross, and J. Batten, “Pathways and Outcomes of Rural Students in Engineering," no. June 2019.[5] K. M. Ganss, “The college transition for