Scholars)According to an ACT study, student retention can be improved by integrating both academic andnon-academic factors, such as academic self-confidence, achievement, motivation, institutionalcommitment, and social support.39 In many instances and despite poor academic performance,students persist because they feel like they fit within the institution and that they are sociallyintegrated.40 Studies suggest that programs that explicitly include mentoring and support groupsimprove student involvement, motivation, and academic self-confidence and, in turn, increaseinstitutional commitment and engagement.41, 42 Inclusive, welcoming institutional environmentsand the connections students feel have been linked to persistence.43-45 Other research
drastic, however, students in this course are challenged to explore understanding inventoryand supply chain models in an abstract manner. Integrating their knowledge built within thecourse, students are asked to write about a concept, model, topic, or issue pertaining todeterministic and stochastic inventory modeling.Creative Writing Assignments. The first poem-writing assignment required students to create an“I am” poem about themselves. This assignment allowed students to experiment and gain someexperience with the specific poetic form on a topic that is personal and well known to them. Thisassignment is due in the second week of the course to encourage creative thinking early on. Thesecond poem-writing assignment required students to create an
content totheir curricula that directly supports education in those fields. Students were also given theopportunity to interact with an off-campus client, which provided an additional uniqueexperience that is not typically found in the classroom. This interaction allowed students tofurther develop their project management and communication skills. This paper will describe theresults of the project, assess the methodologies used to educate the students and review theimpacts of this approach on incorporating novel content into an engineering curriculum.IntroductionHow can students be taught new ideas in emerging technologies in a timely manner? This is achallenge many universities face, incorporating novel content into their curricula
curriculum. This study,known as the Engineering Writing Initiative (EWI) seeks answers to the following questions: • How do the writing skills of engineering students develop during the course of their studies? • What are these students’ attitudes, practices and skills with regard to writing, and how do those attitudes, practices and skills develop over time? • Does writing in engineering courses help students become more involved with those courses and understand and apply the ideas of those courses? • Do improved writing skills help students become stronger engineers? • How can we incorporate we learn about students’ attitudes, practices and skills in order to improve our instructional
Paper ID #39438Board 41: WIP – Community of Practice as a Theory of Change forInfrastructure EducationDr. Kristen L. Sanford P.E., Lafayette College Dr. Kristen Sanford is an associate professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Lafayette Col- lege. Her expertise is in sustainable civil infrastructure management and transportation systems, and transportation and infrastructure education.Dr. Frederick Paige, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Dr. Frederick (”Freddy”) Paige is the founder of the STILE (Society, Technology, Infrastructure, and Learning Environments) Research Group, Assistant
entrepreneurs. A seminar seriesbrings local businessmen and -women in to talk about entrepreneurship principles and ideals andtrains students in basic business planning practices. The students develop a business model tocommercialize their research. These models are presented at an end-of-program EngiPreneurship(engineering entrepreneurship) competition consisting in a “Shark Tank” style pitch contest. Thecompetition is judged by a panel of entrepreneurs and local industry experts, pictured in Figure11. Figure 11: Local experts judging the EngiPreneurship CompetitionExpansionExpansion of the program curriculum began in 2015 by reaching out to additional industrypartners. This initiative began with tours at Danfoss Turbocor, shown in Figure
inspiration, enablers, and challenges for innovation. In addition,issues related to innovation institutionalization (or sustainability) and to evidence gathered by thepanelists to assess and evaluate the institutionalizing process are discussed. Themes andcommonalities of the responses are presented and related to literature on the diffusion ofinnovation.1. IntroductionInnovation "is an idea, practice, or object that is perceived as new by an individual, [even if it isnot] objectively new as measured by the lapse of time since its first use or discovery."1 To gain asense of how innovation is occurring in current engineering education environments in thiscountry, The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching (hereafter referred to as
society, the profession of engineering as a whole andperhaps most difficult, their own places in both their discipline and their profession. As acommunity, we need to develop innovative pedagogies to support all of these aspects of studentdevelopment and to understand the impacts of such pedagogies.In our work, we are exploring student construction of professional portfolios as one suchpedagogical intervention1-2. In these portfolios, students describe their preparedness forengineering practice and provide evidence of their preparedness by drawing on experiences fromacross their curriculum. These portfolios include an overarching professional statement, artifactsillustrating their engineering skills and abilities (e.g. circuit design) and
teaches coursework in curriculum design,laboratory teaching practices, and teaching methods in agricultural education. Central to all of Dr.LaRose’s work as an educator and a scholar is an effort to address inequities in agriculturaleducation curriculum, program design, and recruitment practices. Carol S. Stwalley joined the Minority Engineering Program team in the fall of 2007 asRecruitment and Retention Analyst. She earned her Bachelor of Science in Agriculture andBiological Engineering, M.S.A.B.E., and Ph.D. from Purdue University. Carol has more than 14years in diversity work with considerable background working with the Women in EngineeringPrograms at Purdue. Although retired from her positions as Recruitment and Retention Analyst forthe
bicycle derailleur.One important aspect of this project was an outreach component to Andrew’s middle schoolhome room. Three times the team made presentations to this class of approximately sixty (60)students. The middle school students were engaged by the team and the project, and evenparticipated in some of the design decisions. Our sense was that this activity showed engineeringin a very positive light to the middle school students and most probably opened many of them upto this as a career opportunity. Furthermore the eclectic nature of the project provided a unifyingtheme woven through the fabric of an apparently unrelated middle-school curriculum. Theeighth graders were provided with a panoramic educational vista. This observation was
new objectives and adisappointing level of learning of polymer processes. Student evaluations of the fourcomponents of the module will be used to target improvement efforts.IntroductionThe mechanical engineering students at Campbell University are required to take amanufacturing engineering course in the senior year. The course introduces students to a widevariety of manufacturing processes. It stresses the mechanics of how the processes work, theirapplications, their capabilities and limitations, and product design considerations. Becausemanufacturing decisions are an integral part of the project development process, this course is anideal place to integrate an authentic learning experience that involves additional learningobjectives such as
/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=156296573&site=ehost-live&scope=site. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-07847-4. [11] B. Gavit et al., "Rainwater harvesting structure site suitability using remote sensingand GIS," in Anonymous 2018, . DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-5801-1_23. [12] H. Karimi and H. Zeinivand, "Integrating runoff map of a spatially distributed modeland thematic layers for identifying potential rainwater harvesting suitability sites using GIStechniques," Geocarto Int., vol. 36, (3), pp. 320-339, 2021.Available: https://utep.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=148480827&site=ehost-live&scope=site. DOI: 10.1080/10106049.2019.1608590. [13] J. Milovanovic, T
[24]. If guidedIBL is used throughout the curriculum, students will be more comfortable with the process andneed less support. For example, the first author has added scaled-back elements of guided IBL toa preceding laboratory course to help the students to get comfortable with the process used in thecourse in this study: students identified the parameters controlled for a series of trials and thedata that needed to be collected to answer an authentic question, but the instructor provided thetesting procedure.We also found it helpful to design a class session during which students develop their methods,so that they have time to think through the authentic problem with their teams, but also for wholeclass discussions to ensure that everyone is
potential current or future career choice.’Hulsey et al. (2006) have broken further down the second thrust above in terms of: 1. Integratingentrepreneurship within regular academic programs and curricula and, 2. Providing co-curricularand other activities and initiatives that support and develop the entrepreneurial interests ofstudents. Wilson et al. (2014) have coined the term ‘pracademic’ to highlight the importance ofthe integration of practical and academic components into entrepreneurship education.A number of studies and reports have focused on the key question of ‘What Does It Take ToBecome An ‘Entrepreneurial’ University or College?’ In their 2012 report, the EuropeanCommission proposed a list of seven (7) features that characterize
Paper ID #42419Leveraging Mathematical Modeling to Expand Measurement-Process Opportunitiesfor Engineering StudentsLuis E Montero-Moguel, The University of Texas at San Antonio Luis Montero-Moguel is a Ph.D. Candidate in Interdisciplinary Learning and Teaching specializing in STEM education at The University of Texas at San Antonio (UTSA). Luis holds an MSc in Mathematics Education from the University of Guadalajara and a BSc in Mechanical Engineering. Luis is an NSF-CADRE fellow. As part of his doctoral program, Luis has earned a Graduate Certificate in iSTEM Education and a Graduate Certificate in Engineering Education. With
this project is to fully integrate the curriculum objectives andknowledge of cognitive styles into the software development. Built around the programmingenvironment of LabVIEW this material is intended to provide flexibility in the mode ofpresentation. Specifically, more active hands-on experience will be possible as well as agreater use of visual input. Most engineering students do not gain substantial hands-onexperience in thermodynamics classes, due to time and equipment constraints. It is anticipatedthat use of the virtual instrument capabilities of LabVIEW will give students a closerapproximation of real world experience through simulation.Learning and Teaching StylesBefore presenting a description of the educational software it is
forces the students to 8concentrate on reviewing the semester’s material, whereas most final exams in the USA are lessthan thirty percent of the final grade, which often doesn’t have a large effect on the final gradefor the course. Ethics and academic integrity are also emphasized at VIT University and they haveinternally published a primer8 to help their professors and instructors to improve their instruction.This primer is an excellent book of 21 chapters including topics such as lecturing, questioningtechniques in the classroom, discussions in the classroom, teaching with the case method or casestudies, group work, assessing student’s
aspirations.1 Introduction and BackgroundMany engineering schools are now employing a service-learning approach to globally-basedhumanitarian projects3,4,5. The importance of integrating both globalization and social needs intothe engineering curriculum is acknowledged by the ABET criteria6, and human need is a clearpriority of the engineering profession, as indicated in the NSPE creed*,7. However, the majorityof North American engineering students are not familiar with the contexts in which vast needsexist, such as those among the physically disabled or the estimated 4 billion people living on lessthan $2 a day (PPP)8. These conditions represent a formidable “frontier design environment”, orenvironments outside the experience and expertise of most
. Kelly is an Associate Professor of Physics and the Associate Director of the Science Education Program at Stony Brook University, New York. She attended La Salle University, Philadelphia, Pennsyl- vania, where she received her B.A. degree in chemistry, and completed her M.A. and Ph.D. degrees in science education (2000 and 2006, respectively) and her Ed.M. degree in curriculum and teaching (2007) at Teachers College, Columbia University, New York. She is the recipient of the SUNY Chancellor’s Award for Excellence in Teaching (2016); the Provost’s Faculty Recognition Award for Excellence in Scholarship and Research from Lehman College, City University of New York (2010); and the Outstand- ing Teaching Award from
, and lecture-lab timing is suggested.References1. Krupezak, J., Disney, K., and VanderStoep, S., “Laboratory projects appropriate for non-engineers and introduction to engineering.” 2009 Annual Conference and Exposition, 2009-603, American Society for Engineering Education.2. Sinba, A., “Engineering laboratory experiments – an integrated approach of teaching the introductory engineering course,” 2007 Annual Conference and Exposition, 2007-189, American Society for Engineering Education.3. Dekker, D., “Recent developments in mech lab I at the university of south florida,” 2007 Annual Conference and Exposition, 2007-410, American Society for Engineering Education.4. Salehpour, A., and Antoline, S., “Rapid prototyping as an
representedin the cards with Integrate information from many sources to gain insight and Demonstrateconstant curiosity about our changing world most commonly appearing on 80% and 74% ofcards, respectively. Explore a contrarian view of an accepted solution and Assess and managerisk were least common, being found on only 32% and 30% of cards, respectively.Overall, while some tags appeared more frequently than others, all skillset and mindset tags weresufficiently represented in the dataset so as to be used in our analysis.6. Comparing the EML/Convergence Mapping and Distribution of KEEN CardsOur earlier analysis of the mapping between EML and our Convergence Framework only showsthat we see connections between the different frameworks. Further analysis is
, “Developing and Assessing Students’ Entrepreneurial Skills and Mind-set,” Journal of Engineering Education, 2005, 94 (2), pp. 233-243. 3. MW Ohland, SA Frillman, G Zhang, CE Brawner, and TK Miller III, “The Effect of an Entrepreneurship Program on GPA and Retention,” Journal of Engineering Education, 2004, 93 (4), pp. 293-301. 4. Kern Entrepreneurial Engineering Network website. Online: https://engineeringunleashed.com. Accessed October 15, 2018. 5. C Korach and J Gargac, “Integrating Entrepreneurial Mindset into Freshman Engineering Curriculum through Active Learning Exercises,” submitted to Proceedings of the 2019 American for Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exhibition. June 16
http://www.chapman.edu/wilkinson/research-centers/babbie-center/survey-american-fears.aspx. 2. E. Friedland. “Oral Communication across the Curriculum: What’s a Small College to Do? Report of a Collaborative Pilot by Theatre and Education Faculty.” The Journal of General Education, Volume 53, Number 3-4, 2004, 288-310. Page 26.916.13 3. D.M. Hardison and C. Sonchaeng. “Theatre voice training and technology in teaching oral skills: Integrating the components of a speech event.” System, Volume 33, 2005, 593–608.4. R.A. Berk, and R.H. Trieber. “Whose classroom is it, anyway? Improvisation as a
across the curriculum and providing an early introduction to the relevanthardware. We believe the latter is important to increasing student interest and involvement,which directly impacts recruitment and retention. Of particular benefit will be the inclusion Page 9.1044.31 We have a separate computer laboratory for simulation-based studies. Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering Educationof laboratory experiments in the Electrical Engineering service course for non-majors and,perhaps, in Mechanical
also used Nearpod with engineering students for instruction purposes [8].While the goal of this case study was to increase motivation and academic performance, theinstruction was not tied to information literacy. Instead, Romero Rodriguez used the gamificationaspects of Nearpod to deliver instruction on the engineering curriculum to two of their threecourse sections, with the last section receiving instruction as traditional lectures. They found thevast majority (98%) preferred the gamification instruction used in Nearpod to the traditionalmethods. In addition, 91% of forty-seven students surveyed shared that lectures using Nearpodincreased their motivation for the course topics. The gamified group also had an increasedpassing rate and higher
on performance, attitude, and group behaviors in a technical team environment”, Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA: 1994.Proceedings of the 2005 Midwest Section Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education 114 Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., Smith, K. A., “Cooperative learning returns to college”, Change, Vol. 30, No. 4, 1998.5 Jutras, P. F., “Developing student’s capacity for learning and thinking through integrated curriculum and team learning experiences”, Annual International Association for the Study of Cooperation in Education, Portland, OR: 1994.6
filter implementationaffect filter performance, without the need for tedious programming of the TMS320C31.1. INTRODUCTIONModern software tools such as MATLAB greatly facilitate the professor's ability to demonstratethe concepts of digital signal processing (DSP) in class, and to assign realistic projects toreinforce these concepts.1-3 An increasing number of DSP textbooks are becoming availablewhich take advantage of this ability,4-8 and a growing trend is for DSP concepts to be introducedearlier in the curriculum.9 These concepts can be further reinforced, and greater interestgenerated by the students, if they can be easily implemented in real-time on modern DSPhardware.10 Affordable hardware is now available to schools: Texas Instruments, for
Session 2553 A "NIFTY" Laboratory for First-Year Engineering Students Jose A. Macedo, Susan M. Lord, and Rick T. Olson University of San DiegoAbstractThis paper describes an innovative first-year engineering laboratory in which students design andbuild electromechanical models of systems by applying methods used by practicing engineers.At the University of San Diego (USD), the project is known as the eNgineering Improvement ina FirsT Year (NIFTY) Design Project. The main objective of this laboratory is to help studentsstart developing several key engineering skills early in the curriculum. This
productdevelopment themes into the curriculum in a variety of ways. First year students in theintroductory processes course are brought into the consortium center and given an overview ofRP technology and its capabilities.Second year and third year MNET majors take a minimum of three courses that utilize theGPRPC for learning opportunities. In the safety class, workplace hazards are addressedincluding: hazardous materials handling, ergonomic analysis of workstations and personalprotective equipment requirements are covered. At this point in their academic career, studentsmay be hired as employees of the consortium. For those with paid positions, students maintain
attractive to students and connected to the broadercommunity. At Regents College, the most important and challenging aspect of being a virtualinstitution is assuring quality through measuring outcomes, i.e., assessment. In addition torecognition of academic validations by other institutions, assessment takes place in two formats:individualized (special and portfolio assessment); and specialized (written proficiency andperformance examinations). The attention to assessment and academic outcome measurement isat the heart of the curriculum both in general education and in specific programs. The tools ofassessment and benchmark processes are in constant review to maintain the integrity of theassessment process. The overall quality assurance framework