Conference Session

PCEE Session 2: Teacher Learning Experiences

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Allison Antink-Meyer, Illinois State University; Ryan Brown, Illinois State University

1 27 1 29 The findings suggests that the extent of reflection on a topic that a PST was curious aboutdid not meaningfully relate to any changes in their teaching confidence. This is similar to thefindings from Antink-Meyer et al.’s study wherein science curiosity and change in confidencewas not observed. Reflection on content and the development of content knowledge was notdirect. In addition to examining journaling strategies that sustain connectedness to inquiry andengineering design experiences, future studies are needed that examine whether disciplinarydomains imbue associations between types of curiosity and types of epistemic engagement.RQ2 What is the nature of the engineering curiosity expressed

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division Technical Session 7

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lisa Bosman, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI); Nathalie Duval-Couetil, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Karoline Jarr

increasing access to like-minded peers through astructured cohort-based community of practice. Participating in this program allows engineeringfaculty to add value to the promotion and tenure portfolio that goes beyond curriculumdevelopment to disseminating best teaching practices. Given that today engineering facultymembers are even more accountable for the effectiveness of their teaching and learningactivities, this is an ideal program to incentivize engineering faculty in a way that enhances theirpromotion and publishing opportunities.To learn more, visit www.PurduePD.com.6. Appendix7. References[1] L. Bosman and S. Fernhaber, "Applying authentic learning through cultivation of the entrepreneurial mindset in the engineering classroom

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Darby Riley, Rowan University; Cayla Ritz, Rowan University; Cheryl Bodnar, Rowan University; Kaitlin Mallouk, Rowan University

represented (particularly those on the outer fringes of thenetwork who have fewer connections), as those only connected through workshop attendancecan no longer be used in this calculation. However, five of node 29’s direct connections (a totalof 21 other nodes) were made and maintained through workshops alone, and so node 29’snetwork is still decreased when workshop connections are no longer considered.Also of note are the two relatively large nodes who did not use workshops in developing theirEM: 11 and 3. When connections made through workshops were removed from the network, thebetweenness of node 3 dropped a small amount from 0.08 to 0.06. However, node 3 describedtheir experience at KEEN conferences (their most influential resource) as

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 13: Work-in-Progress Postcard Session #2

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Joshua Hertz, Northeastern University

a team decided they’d like to obtain help from a Consultant, they could choose one to“hire” from a list of all the Consultants in the program. The team reached out to them to schedule amutually agreeable time and were asked to give advance notice on the topic(s) with which they want toreceive help. The Project Consultants were trained such that their interaction was much more aligned withfocused instruction that enabled a team to solve their own problem, as opposed to directly solving theproblem for the team. In this way, working with a Project Consultant served to both advance the progressof the team’s project and reinforce the broader course outcome of increased engineering self-efficacy. A small amount of internal funding was

Conference Session

ERM: Self-Efficacy, Motivation, and MORE!

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jan Edwards, College of Lake County; ANA PIZANO, College of Lake County

Paper ID #37223Work in Progress: Developing an Engineering Community ina FablabJan Edwards Jan L. Edwards is an Associate Professor of Engineering at the College of Lake County in Illinois. She received her Bachelor’s and Master’s degree in Materials Science and Engineering at Michigan Technological University. Ms. Edwards teaches general engineering courses, manages outreach initiatives and the CLC Baxter Innovation Lab at the community college. She is also serving as the Principal Investigator on the college’s NSF S-STEM grant, Building an Academic Community of Engineering Scholars.ANA PIZANO Ana K. Pizano

Conference Session

ERM: Engineering Identity: (Identity Part 1)

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Hannah Budinoff, The University of Arizona; Vignesh Subbian, The University of Arizona; Francesca Lopez

flexibility on how studentsidentify and integrate assets in the learning and engineering design process. To this end,instructor professional development on ABP is needed. As a next step, we will explore ways toengage other instructors in ABP-related training and identify a broader set of ABPs.References[1] A. Haverkamp, M. Bothwell, D. Montfort, and Q.-L. Driskill, “Calling for a Paradigm Shift in the Study of Gender in Engineering Education,” Studies in Engineering Education, vol. 1, no. 2, p. 55, Feb. 2021.[2] A. E. Trauth, J. M. Buckley, T. N. Barnes, J. Enszer, S. Rooney, and R. Davidson, “Adjusting the Lens: Comparison of Focus Group and Cross-Sectional Survey Data in Identifying and Addressing Issues of Diversity

Conference Session

Engineering Design Graphics Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Theodore Branoff, Illinois State University; Jaby Mohammed, Illinois State University; Joshua Brown

all students enrolled in TEC116 during this period, and persistence data on other majorswould provide useful information for other programs within the department.References1. Sorby, S. A. (2005). Assessment of a" new and improved" course for the development of 3-D spatial skills. The Engineering Design Graphics Journal, 69(3).2. Veurink, N. L., Hamlin, A. J., Kampe, J. C. M., Sorby, S. A., Blasko, D. G., Holliday-Darr, K. A., Trich Kremer, J. D., Abe Harris, L. V., Connolly, P. E., Sadowski, M. A., Harris, K. S., Brus, C. P., Boyle, L. N., Study, N. E., & Knott, T. W. (2009). Enhancing visualization skills-improving options and success (EnVİSIONS) of engineering and technology students. The Engineering Design Graphics

Conference Session

ERM: Exploring Educational Technology in Engineering

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ahmed Ashraf Butt, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Saira Anwar, Texas A&M University; Muhsin Menekse, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE)

are a few limitations of the potential study. As an exploratory research study, thestatistical significance of the analysis has limitations compared to the ones from theexplanatory research study. Another limitation is that it needs to be further tested in differentsettings such as large, commercial, educational applications, or across different institutions tomake the results more generalizable. Furthermore, the study doesn’t account for differentconfounding variables such as ethnicity, academic performance, or race. Moreover, this studycould be enhanced by including the process data such as classroom observations for students’engagement [28] , or other students analytics data.References[1] D. Yang and S. J. Baldwin, “Using technology to

Conference Session

Computers in Education 5 - Modulus 4

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nicolas Leger, Florida International University; Bruk Berhane, Florida International University

Computational Toolsin Engineering Education: A Case Study on the Use of Mathcad,” Chemical EngineeringEducation (CEE), vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 180–87, 1997.[10]H. S. Fogler and N. M. Gurmen, “Aspen Plus™ Workshop for Reaction Engineeringand Design,” p. 44.[11]N. Chonacky and D. Winch, “Maple, Mathematica, and Matlab: the 3M’s withoutthe tape,” Computing in Science Engineering, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 8–16, Jan. 2005, doi:10.1109/MCSE.2005.18.[12]P. V. V. R. Rao, G. Durga Prasad, and S. Dileep Kumar Varma, “PedagogicalApproach to Teach the Modeling of Power Electronic Converters,” in 2014 IEEE SixthInternational Conference on Technology for Education, Dec. 2014, pp. 191–192. doi:10.1109/T4E.2014.59

Collection

ASEE-NE 2022

Authors

Mansour Zenouzi, Wentworth Institute of Technology; Gregory J Kowalski, Northeastern University; Aliagha Rezvani

sustainable energy through salinitygradient [2]. Prospects for the various energy sources were assessed after the 1973 oil crisis, andSidney Loeb [3] introduced the idea of PRO in the 1970’s. However, research slowed down in the80s and 90s due to the expensive cost of the available membranes, which would make osmoticpower generation financially unviable. More recently interest in searching new clean and non-periodic energy sources resulted in the construction of several large or small-scale pilot SGP powerplants [4, 5]. Salinity gradient can provide us with a very large source of clean energy. Riversaround the world with an average flow of 1.2×10 m3/s have the potential to produce up to 2.5 TWof energy. This is about 13 percent of the current world's

Conference Session

PCEE Session 2: Teacher Learning Experiences

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rebekah Hammack, Montana State University - Bozeman; Ibrahim H. Yeter, Nanyang Technological University

participants’ experiences.ReferencesAston, S., & Jackson, D. (2009). Blurring the boundaries or muddying the waters? Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 14(1), 68–76.Avsec, S., & Sajdera, J. (2019). Factors infuencing pre-service preschool teachers’ engineering thinking: Model development and test. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 29(5), 1105–1132.Aydeniz, M., & Bilican, K. (2018). The impact of engagement in STEM activities on primary preservice teachers’ conceptualization of stem and knowledge of stem pedagogy. Journal of Research in STEM Education, 4(2), 213–234. https://doi.org/10.51355/jstem.2018.46Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying

Conference Session

Civil Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Charles Riley, Oregon Institute of Technology; Dave Kim, Washington State University-Vancouver; Ken Lulay, University of Portland; John Lynch, Washington State University

students care?  How to…  Example(s)  Common mistakes by students  Tools: templates, presentations, spreadsheets, and other resourcesBased on the report writing outcomes and investigations of student report writing performance atthe three participating institutions [19-21], the authors prepared scaffolded learning modulesorganized around (1) fundamental concepts needed to submit a successful first report, (2)intermediate concepts intended to support more rigorous consideration of data sources, methodsof analysis, and conclusions, and (3) advanced concepts in error and logical appeals. A prefacewas developed to orient users and support instructors with guidance around assessment designand the use of effective rubrics. The

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 8: Academic Progress, Retention, and Mathematics

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Yanfen Li, University of Massachusetts Lowell; Na'imah White, University of Massachusetts Lowell; Karoline Evans, University of Massachusetts Lowell; Douglas Correa Ospina, University of Massachusetts Lowell

,” 2021.[3] S. Haag, N. F. Hubele, A. M. García, and K. McBeath, “Engineering undergraduate attrition and contributing factors,” International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 929–940, 2007.[4] R. Stevens, K. O’Connor, L. Garrison, A. Jocuns, and D. M. Amos, “Becoming an Engineer: Toward a Three Dimensional View of Engineering Learning,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 97, no. 3, pp. 355–368, 2008, doi: 10.1002/j.2168- 9830.2008.tb00984.x.[5] E. Crede and M. Borrego, “The Effect of International Diversity on Graduate Engineering Education: A Literature Review,” 2010. doi: 10.18260/1-2–15975.[6] M. C. Paretti and L. D. McNair, “Analyzing the intersections of institutional and discourse identities in

Conference Session

Minorities in Engineering Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jacqueline McDermott, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Janet Beagle

mentors willuse these skills in future professoriate and professional roles. GradTrack achieves these goalsthrough a comprehensive program that moves beyond simple mentoring and includes structuresthat seek to build a culture of belonging for both current and future graduate students inengineering.References[1] American Society for Engineering Education, “Profiles of Engineering and Engineering Technology.” Washington, DC, 2021.[2] A.W. Fentiman, J. Beagle, P. Dunston, and S. Fisher, Establishing Pathways to the Professoriate for Underrepresented Minority Students, American Society for Engineering Education 2017 Annual Conference Proceedings, June 2017, Columbus, Ohio, USA.[3] K. I. Maton, F. A. Hrabowski III, and C. Schmitt, “African

Conference Session

ETD - Technical Session 7 - ET Pedagogy I

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Wei Zhan, Texas A&M University; Yonghui Wang, Prairie View A&M University; Suxia Cui, Prairie View A&M University; Bugrahan Yalvac, Texas A&M University

: Learning fromDisruption", Virtual. https://peer.asee.org/38240.[4] Jackson, S., & Jackson, A. (2002, June), Learning Online: A Virtual Education? Paper presented at2002 Annual Conference, Montreal, Canada. 10.18260/1-2—10612.[5] Tabas, J. M., & LeMay, C. M., & Freije, E. (2012, June), Online Education: The End ofLearning Paper presented at 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, San Antonio, Texas.10.18260/1-2--21761[6] James-Okeke, P. A., & Scott, C. J., & Astatke, Y., & Ladeji-Osias, J. O., & Partlow, L. E., & Nyarko,K. (2013, June), A Performance Assessment Framework for Measuring Online Student LearningOutcomes Paper presented at 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, Georgia.10.18260/1-2

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 1: Student Success Boot Camps, Summer Bridge Programs, and Living Learning Communities

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Miriam Howland Cummings, University of Colorado Denver; Maryam Darbeheshti, University of Colorado Denver; Stephanie Ivey, The University of Memphis; Craig Stewart; David Russomanno, Indiana University - Purdue University Indianapolis; Danny King, Indiana University - Purdue University Indianapolis; Katherine Goodman, University of Colorado Denver; James Campbell, The University of Memphis; Tom Altman; Michael Jacobson, University of Colorado Denver; Gregory Simon, University of Colorado Denver

Paper ID #37614Summer Bridge Programming for Incoming First-YearStudents at Three Public Urban Research UniversitiesMiriam Howland Cummings (Graduate Research Assistant) Miriam is a PhD candidate in Education Research and Evaluation Methods at the University of Colorado Denver (CU Denver) and a graduate research assistant on an NSF S-STEM grant in CU Denver's College of Engineering, Design, and Computing.Maryam Darbeheshti (Faculty) Dr. Maryam Darbeheshti is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Colorado Denver. Her research interests are in multiphase fluid flow, and Engineering

Collection

2022 ASEE Midwest Section Conference

Authors

Aubrey L. Schultz; Jay McAllister III

; Document Types: Engineering Rechtin; Karthik Nayani; Thomas W. Review Article or Article; O) OR AU=(THOMA GREG) OR AU=(WALKER HEATHER L) OR AU=(WALTERS KEISHA B) OR [11] Smith; Tom O. Spicer; Greg Thoma; Heather L. Walker; AU=(WICKRAMASINGHE RANIL) OR AU=(WICKRAMASINGHE RANIL S) OR AU=(WICKRAMASINGHE Affiliations: University of Keisha Bishop Walters; Ranil Wickramasinghe SUMITH

Conference Session

WIED: Analysis, Challenges, Success, and Impacts

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Elizabeth DaMaren, University of Toronto; Alison Olechowski, University of Toronto

opportunity to improve access and support to increase gender diversity in these spaces.Other literature points to methods of studying student experience and emotion when using CAD fordesign, such as Villanueva et al.’s 2018 multimodal study on emotions and electrodermal activity indesign activities [59], which could have applications for finding ways of making CAD software moreaccessible. Similarly, Zhou et al. [60], Phadnis et al. [61], and Deng et al.’s [62] studies point to multi-user CAD as a new technology with the potential for higher user engagement, collaboration, and learning.Unfortunately, these studies, even when they report participant gender, are limited by a lack of genderanalysis, thus failing to report on how women may experience

Conference Session

ERM: Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Robert Loweth, University of Michigan; Sara Hoffman, University of Michigan; Shanna Daly, University of Michigan; Leah Paborsky; Steve Skerlos, University of Michigan

Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Engineering Division Technical Session - Interdisciplinary Capstone Projects, Pandemic Adapted Mechatronics Lab, Call for Change

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Bart Johnson, Itasca Community College; Ronald Ulseth; Michael Raich, Itasca Community College

with digital savvy, new skills in innovating and collaborating, problemframing expertise, and horizontal leadership skills, while putting emphasis on the impacts in theeconomic development of rural regions.In the initial stages, 1990’s–2000’s, the program’s faculty spent time innovating in courses andcurricula trying to shift towards the recently released ABET 2000 student outcome criteria in arural community college setting. The mid-2000’s brought the development of a multi-disciplinary upper division university satellite program that embraced the Aalborg (DK) modelof PBL. The new multi-disciplinary program had ABET outcomes at its core, focusing on thedevelopment of a whole new engineer, especially developing innovative strategies

Conference Session

ERM: Student Professional Development: Professional Skills and Moving Beyond the Classroom

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Beata Johnson, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Joyce Main, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE)

were associated with academic and social engagement outcomes.These findings on perceived development are further supported by Simmons et al.’s [33] surveyof undergraduate engineering students. Students reported personal development, socialdevelopment, and social engagement as the greatest benefits of participating in extra-/co-curricularactivities. The most common types of participation were in job; sports; design competition team;culture, faith, gender, and identity; and professional experiences (e.g., internships). The variety inthese top activities illustrates a range of engineering student involvement in both engineering andnon-engineering activities. Other studies have affirmed distinct benefits of non-engineering versusengineering

Conference Session

Social Identities and STEM Experiences: Equity, Culture & Social Justice in Education Division Technical Session 6

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jacqueline Handley, University of Michigan

statusquo. As we, as engineering educators, look to the future work of pre-college engineering,continuing to learn with and from BIPOC youth and designing experiences towards counteringexclusion remains vital continued work.References[1] A. Johri and B. M. Olds, “Situated Engineering Learning: Bridging Engineering Education Research and the Learning Sciences,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 151–185, Jan. 2011, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00007.x.[2] G. J. Kelly and J. L. Green, Theory and Methods for Sociocultural Research in Science and Engineering Education. Routledge, 2018.[3] K. L. Gunckel and S. Tolbert, “The imperative to move toward a dimension of care in engineering education,” Journal of Research in

Conference Session

ECE Division Technical Session 2: Long-Term Institutional Outcome Evaluations and Capstone Innovations

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Annie Patrick, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Scott Dunning, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Mary Brewer, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Kimberly Johnston, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Nicole Gholston, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Susan Broniak, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

serves as a guide to other departments seeking ways to bridge their advisors andfaculty.Literature ReviewAcademic advising emerged in the mid-1800’s when colleges began to develop programs withelectives and more academic choices [19]. College administrators noted that students neededguidance in navigating their growing course options and class electives as colleges introducedmore majors and career paths [5]. Kenyon College was one of the first colleges that required theirstudents to choose a faculty member to assist them in this process and mentorship [20]. Aboutthirty years later, Johns Hopkins University would establish one of the first formal advising modelsbetween students and faculty members [21]. During these early years, the faculty would

Conference Session

DEED Technical Session 3 Capstone Design

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Wilhelm Friess, University of Maine; Justin Lapp, University of Maine; Andrew Goupee

faculty (VF) ○ Motivation: Decrease workload and increase project variety ● 2020-21 Single principal instructor model with assigned collaborative faculty (AF) ○ Motivation: Maintain project variety and reduce faculty workload while short- staffed lead instructors ● 2021-22 Multi-instructor model with split responsibilities (MI-S) ○ Motivation: address workload and project management difficulties of previous models 6 NUMBEROFPARTICIPATINGFACULTY 5

Conference Session

Engineering Libraries Technical Session 6: Diversity

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sarah Lester, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Kelly Durkin Ruth

LIS scholarship, Peterson believes that multiculturalism has“clogged our literature primarily with the mantra ‘Everyone is different, and isn't that special?’[4]” Observing a superficial treatment of these underlying issues with little reflection or analysison the implications for our practice, Honma [26] builds on Peterson’s work, noting that althoughLIS scholarship often uses words like diversity, equity, and inclusion when discussing race andracism, “the precise reasons why we need to ‘diversify’ seldom receive(s) any close scrutiny.”Honma goes on to say that “the focus on concepts such as ‘diversity’ and ‘ethnicity’ elides anymention of race, problematically divorcing these terms from the distinct power relations of theirracialized

Conference Session

Civil Engineering Division - Changing How We Teach: Flipping, Project-Based Learning, and More!

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Philip Harvey, University of Oklahoma; Chase Hibbard, University of Oklahoma

to get to the shake table faster and getting that out of the way.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.CMMI-1943917. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation. The authors would also like the thank Dr. Hong Lin of the Center for FacultyExcellence at the University of Oklahoma for her assistance with the assessment.References [1] K. L. Ryan, S. Soroushian, E. Maragakis, E. Sato, T. Sasaki, and T. Okazaki, “Seismic simulation of an integrated ceiling-partition wall-piping system at E-Defense. I: Three-dimensional

Conference Session

Social Identities and STEM Experiences: Equity, Culture & Social Justice in Education Division Technical Session 6

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michelle Ausman; Atsushi Akera, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; Alan Cheville, Bucknell University; Sarah Appelhans, University at Albany-SUNY; Melissa Shuey, Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University

either Discord or a Google account.AcknowledgmentsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under the NSFEAGER Grant DUE-1745922. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions, or recommendationsexpressed in this paper are those of the authors only and do not necessarily reflect the views ofthe National Science Foundation. The authors extend their gratitude to all interview participantswho allowed us to add their narratives to this study. The authors also extend their appreciation tothe anonymous reviewers for their thoughtful comments and feedback.References[1] C. Hodges, S. Moore, B. Lockee, T. Trust, and A. Bond, “The Difference Between Emergency Remote Teaching and Online Learning,” Educase Review, no. 27

Collection

2022 ASEE Gulf Southwest Annual Conference

Authors

Toriano Armèl Thomas, Norfolk State University; Bini Ben; Sacharia Albin, Norfolk State University; Sunday Adeyinka Ajala, Norfolk State University; Matthew Edward Bickett; Ryan David Shahan, Old Dominion University; Puspita Panigrahi, Norfolk State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

/10.1364/AO.32.001154.[2] P. K. Koech, M. Ogini, S. Mohan, A. Alice Francis, M. Deo, S. Albin, and K. B. Sundaram, “Characterization of Silicon Nanowires Reflectance by Effective Index Due to Air-Silicon Ratio,” ECS Transactions, 89(4), 17–30, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1149/08904.0017ecst[3] S. Patchett, M. Khorasaninejad, O, N., and S. S. Saini, “Effective index approximation for ordered silicon nanowire arrays,” Journal of the Optical Society of America B, 30(2), 306. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1364/josab.30.000306.[4] F. Kimeu, S. Albin, K. Song, and K. C. Santiago, “ALD-passivated silicon nanowires for broadband absorption applications,” AIP Advances, 11(6), 065101, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1063

Conference Session

PCEE Technical Session 5: STEM Teacher Instructional Moves

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Benny Mart Hiwatig, University of Minnesota - Twin Cities; Gillian Roehrig, University of Minnesota - Twin Cities; Joshua Ellis, Florida International University; Mark Rouleau

address this need, thisstudy examined the relationship between student cognitive engagement in iSTEM and itshypothesized predictors: curricular opportunities for STEM content integration, engagement inmultiple solution development, agency in STEM practices, evidence-based reasoning, datapractices, and collaboration. The study is guided by Roehrig et al.’s (2021) Detailed ConceptualFramework of Integrated STEM and Moore et al.'s (2014) framework for Quality K-12Engineering Education. We utilized multinomial logistic regression (MLR) analysis due to thepolytomous categorical distribution of the outcome variable. This study used classroom videodata from previous work that examined the presence of critical features of K-12 iSTEM. Scoresusing a novel

Conference Session

PCEE Session 13: Equity in P-12 Engineering Education

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Christine Cunningham, Pennsylvania State University; Gregory Kelly, Pennsylvania State University

are asked to reflect on and discuss where they haveencountered a similar problem in their home or community and are invited to discuss and sharetheir ideas using whichever language(s) are most useful to them. For example, students mightdiscuss: Where do they see plastic polluting the environment? Have they had challenges crossingan intersection as a walker, biker, or skateboarder? How much light do they like in their room asthey go to sleep? By inviting students to reflect on related experiences, students can approach aproblem, even a new problem, with a focus on what knowledge and skills they bring that caninform their investigations and solutions.Develop familiarity with materials, tasks, and terminology. Students’ background knowledge