Educational Reform and Research Activity. She obtained a Ph.D. in English Literature from Chiba University in 2002. Her current main research interests are: 1) how including humanities courses in an engineering education curriculum can help students to gain flexibility, and an appreciation of equity, and a greater richness of ideas; 2) finding and solving the systematic issues impacting the effectiveness of engineering education, specifically in the context of project-based learnings; and 3) assessing the impact of interdisciplinary engi- neering project-based learnings. Below are her recent presentations at international conferences: WERA 2022, APAIE 2022, IIAI DSIR 2021, IIAI DSIR 2020, WERA 2019. She obtained the
Group.Dr. Octavio Mattasoglio Neto Neto Undergraduate in Physics (1983), master in Science (1989) and phd at Education (1998) all of them from Universidade de S˜ao Paulo. Professor of Physics at Mau´a Institute of Technology, since 1994 and President of Teacher’s Academy of the same Institute, ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Elaboration of a Contextualized Event for teaching eigenvalues and eigenvectors in the Control and Automation Engineering programIntroductionResearch in Mathematics Education, for example, [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6] have explored thesubject of Linear Algebra
; supply chain design; and undergraduate, graduate, and online systems engineering education development and assessment. In 2018, she started the SmartBuildings CT program at UConn with funding from Eversource and the United Illuminating Company. She is part of the leadership team at the University of Connecticut that leads the newly awarded US Department of Energy’s Southern New England Industrial Assessment Center and that offers no-charge energy audits to 20 manufacturing facili- ties in CT each year to help them lower their energy usage and costs. Dr. Thompson was the recipient of the US EPA Environment Merit Award, Region 1 (2017).Prof. Matthew D. Stuber, University of Connecticut Dr. Matt Stuber is an Assistant
different universities. Students and departments have always praised him for his outstanding teaching and research excellence. He has been involved in numerous professional societies to supplement his teaching and research, including ASCE, ACI, ASEE, ASC, ATMAE, and TRB. His re- search output has been well disseminated as he has published 100+ journal papers and conference papers. His research interests are 1) Creating Innovative Sustainable Materials, 2) Digital Construction, 3) BIM and VDC, 4) Virtual Testing Lab, 5) Construction Education, and 6) Sustainability.Kathryn Bedette, Kennesaw State UniversityGiovanni Loreto, Kennesaw State University Giovanni Loreto is an Assistant Professor in the College of Architecture and
education, 21st century skills, and design and evaluation of learning environments informed by the How People Learn framework. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Switching research labs: A phenomenological study of international graduate students. AbstractInternational graduate students in engineering and science deal with cultural shock as theynavigate and try to adapt to a new educational system in the United States of America (US) [1].Many international graduate students deal with multiple challenges which some of their USnational peers may not deal with [2]. For different reasons, graduate students may request tochange from one research group to
ongoing work in developing and evaluating the effectiveness ofthe new robotics programming course.Literature ReviewThere are many K-12 initiatives involving robotics hardware and programming that encouragestudents to pursue STEM professions [1] - [2]. Additionally, there are undergraduate-levelcourses in robotics [3] – [7] typically designed to enhance motivation for students majoring inSTEM professions. Barba et al. [8] present the design of two graduate courses for non-majors,adult learners, and non-traditional students. The courses use Pixelsense and Arduino to teachcomputational thinking, programming, and design skills. The authors specifically mention theimportance of platform choice, assignment structure, maintaining student motivation, and
. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Student Persistence in Engineering Majors: A Description of Engineering Students at Two Universities Before and During COVID-19 Karen E. Rambo-Hernandez, Olukayode Apata, Syahrul Amin, Blaine Pedersen, Camille S. Burnett, Bimal Nepal, Noemi V Mendoza Diaz Texas A&M UniversityIntroduction This work-in-progress study describes persistence rates using institutional data todetermine which student demographic groups were more impacted by COVID-19 interruptions.Several have indicated the need for more engineers to address the urgent needs of industry andpublic safety [1]. Unfortunately, when compared to other majors
different universities such as Northeastern, Suffolk and Tufts. He has been teaching as a profes ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023USING SOLIDWORKS TO IMPROVE STUDENT'S UNDERSTANDING OF TYPICAL CRYSTAL STRUCTURES OF CRYSTALLINE SOLIDS Xiaobin Le and Masoud Olia Wentworth Institute of Technology1. INTRODUCTION Materials science is a required course in our Mechanical Engineering Program. One importanttopic which is covered in this course is the crystal structures of crystalline solids [1~4]. Thetypical crystal structures are body-centered cubic (BCC) crystal structures, face-centered cubic(FCC) crystal structures, and hexagonal
alsoreceives students who are unable to complete at a 4-year school due to relocation and job-relatedissues. Placing all upper division courses online has also aided our traditional on campusstudents by giving students the opportunity to take a course while at co-ops and internships.Survey feedback from face to face and online students indicates no major issues with theeducational experience. Outcome assessment data and student course evaluations indicates asimilar level of performance between online and face to face students. Student placement datadoes not indicate problems with the online program.1. introductionThe pathway to an engineering degree may be blocked for some students due to location andtime of day restrictions. Online degree options can
adoption of smart andautonomous systems fueled by advanced data processing and machine learning. Althoughconstruction management (CM) students are exposed to current fundamentals of constructiontechnologies including BIM, students may potentially lack the fundamental knowledge andtechnological skills required for efficiently integrating, programming, and controlling robotics onconstruction sites. As such, it is critical to investigate CM students’ skill gaps in order to preparethe graduating future workforces with the required advanced automation-based technologies.This study aims to investigate: (1) the preparedness of CM students in terms of their ability tounderstand machine learning techniques and work with smart technologies such as Robotics
entering doctoral engineering programsand aims to provide a timely and preparatory experience for rising doctoral students inengineering to address issues related to transitioning into the Ph.D. The purpose of this paper isto describe the RDI intervention hosted in 2019, the research findings obtained from this pilot,and outline the RDI Dissemination Model we have developed and will be executing over thenext five years.Program Description The goals of the pilot RDI program were to 1) provide a timely orientation for risingdoctoral students about preparing themselves to start graduate school, 2) create a mentoringnetwork where minority graduate students at proposal and dissertation phases (DI participants)can mentor rising doctoral students
development at 2-year Hispanic Serving Institutions (HSIs).The goal of HSI ATE Hub is to build capacity and leadership at 2-year HSIs for developingcompetitive ATE proposals to elevate 2-year HSIs as drivers of their community’s economicsuccess via technician education.Data sets from three annual HSI ATE Hub Cohorts, four prior KickStarter Cohorts, and nineMentor-Connect Cohorts have been aggregated to assess the following research questions about2-year HSIs: 1. Are there unique opportunities/barriers/challenges related to STEM program development and grant-writing endeavors for advanced technological education? 2. How do we build capacity to pursue the opportunities and address the barriers/challenges? 3. How do mentoring efforts
practiceand application with weekly faculty cohort meetings, coaching, and reflection.Introduction and BackgroundThe importance of undergraduate research is well understood, as it increases student self-efficacy, introduces new career opportunities, and encourages persistence to degreecompletion [1, 2]. The merits of multi-year research experiences and the influence of mentorsare also well-documented [3, 4]. The benefit of research experiences for undergraduates(REUs) is so significant that the National Science Foundation (NSF) supports multipleannual summer REUs through annual grants. Students have the opportunities to apply toREUs nationwide and, if selected, have the opportunity to travel to another campus, workwith a faculty researcher, and learn
bachelor’s degree in aerospace engineering from MIT and a master’s degree in systems engineering from the University of Virginia. Alexandra comes to FIU af- ter completing a postdoctoral fellowship at Georgia Tech’s Center for the Enhancement of Teaching and Learning (CETL) and three years as a faculty member at Olin College of Engineering in Massachusetts. Alexandra’s research aims to amplify the voices and work of students, educators, and Minority-Serving Institutions (MSIs) overall and support continued educational innovation within engineering at these in- stitutions. Specifically, she focuses on (1) educational and professional development of graduate students and faculty, (2) critical transitions in education and
grounded by the mutual mentoring model (Yun et al., 2016) conceptualframework offered an in-depth understanding of the potential efficacy of goal-match mentoring.Deductive data analysis strategies established by Stake (1995) were utilized to examine theinterview data. Three themes emerged on the potential efficacy of goal-match mentoring: (1)Identifying a career goal prior to the beginning of the mentoring match requires deep reflectionon behalf of the mentee and promotes goal accountability; (2) The mentoring relationshipquickly blooms as the nature of the mentoring need is identified early in the process; and (3) Theexpertise of the mentor is swiftly leveraged for the maximum benefit of the mentee. Thesefindings reveal the value of mentoring
is to only accommodate an exclusive population of studentswhile the less conventional students are forgotten and left behind. Instead, we show howIoT can be used to bring the outlier students into the system. IoT can also be used toprovide substantial educational assistance. IoT creates opportunities for vicarious andvirtual inclusion. IoT is the tool, and now is the time to build an education system for allstudents, not just those that fit academia’s cost-efficient model of mass education. Thepaper includes cases where IoT is being successfully used to democratize education.Keywords: Education 4.0, Industry 4.0, IoT, Remote learning, Inclusive education.1. Introduction: Inclusive and Exclusive EducationPerhaps the term “inclusive education
discussions of: 1) critical activities that may have influenced student reactionsand outcomes; 2) impact on instructors and learning objectives; 3) suggestions forfuture strategies will be presented and described.Dedication:As authors, we are a collection of Indigenous and non-Indigenous educators andresearchers ranging from decades of experience to a graduate student that have cometogether through a pre-engineering collaborative. We live and work on the Land of theOceti Sakowin (Dakota, Nakota, Lakota), Anishinaabe, Nueta, Hidatsa, and SahnishPeoples. We honor the land as sentient, alive before us and continuing after us.Introduction and Background: The nature of the SARS-COVID-2 pandemic has sent ripples across educationalsystems on a global scale
teaching capacities of educators in sub-SaharanAfrica is one of the most effective ways of improving the state of education, and indirectly,the quality of life of Sub-Saharan African citizens [1]–[3]. Consequently, effective teacherdevelopment requires an intimate knowledge of the current state of teacher development inthe subcontinent. This study was motivated by a recognition of that need. We begin with anexplanation of the current state of human development in sub-Saharan Africa. Then weremark on efforts that have been directed towards improvement. We comment on the successreports so far but establish why proper consideration needs to be given to this topic in orderfor constituting countries in sub-Saharan Africa to fashion their socio
instructions within computer programs that direct how theseprograms read, collect, process, and analyze data. We use the term bias to refer to computeralgorithms that systematically discriminate against certain content, individuals, or groupswithout a sound basis [1].As automated systems become an integral part of many decisions that affect our daily life,civil rights, and public discourse, there is concern among social scientists and computerscientists about the presence of bias in machine learning and big-data algorithms. A body ofwork has appeared in popular as well as scholarly literature addressing algorithm bias. In2018, then visiting assistant professor at the University of Southern California, Safiya Noble[2], who also holds a faculty
diversity and inclusion in one-shot information literacy classesIntroduction Many academic departments in higher educational institutions rely on their libraries tooffer Information literacy (IL) classes. Librarians typically design the content of their IL classesin consultation with the teaching faculty members. The content may include topics on avoidingplagiarism, strategies for reading a technical paper, finding relevant resources, evaluation ofinformation sources, and general library orientations [1]. These sessions can be taughtsynchronously and asynchronously. Regardless of the content and discourse platform, these ILclasses are typically one-shot classes that are forty-five to ninety minutes long. As
required to meet thedemands of the future. A comprehensive examination from the national reports [1] of suchprograms summarized five themes over the past 40+ years that include: the approaches used,policies implemented, establishing institutional culture and climate, information and knowledgegenerated, and investments made. These key features demonstrate the increasing awareness andpurposeful actions needed to encourage increased and successful engagement from racial andethnic minorities, women, low income students and other non-majority identities. Engineeringcolleges began offering support services to students who were underrepresented in engineeringand responded by developing minority and/or women in engineering programs that featuredembedded
current studies only have a short-term timeframe of 1 to 2 years of data formeasuring the effects of mentoring programs on women engineers. However, the University ofToledo conducted a long term 5-year study focused on improving the retention rates of women inengineering [3]. The study discussed the University’s programs focused on supporting women inengineering through mentoring programs, job rotations, communication workshops, and projects.The study also measured retention rates from the women between their first and second year. Italso used a survey to measure the students’ satisfaction with the programs at the end of the yearshowing the mentoring program receiving the highest rating. The results showed the programsdid increase retention rates
, team workbook, annotated writingplatform, engaging videos, and live scenarios audio clips, among others. According to Despain,2020 [1], multiple studies have found that only 20% of the impact of training comes from actuallylearning the information while 80% comes from reinforcing that information. One of the mostimportant considerations for an effective training program is how the curriculum is reinforced onceit is learned. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, which swept all activities from its normalcy acrossthe globe, a virtual training was organized for ETA-STEM team members consisting of facultyand graduate assistants in six participating disciplines at the authors institution. In a systematicreview by Gast et al., (2014) [2], several studies
timeapplying software engineering practices in Zoom breakout meetings. Asynchronous studentscompleted the course materials on their own after viewing video lectures. Both groups ofstudents answered online survey questions about their perceptions of the effectiveness of thecourse activities and their personal levels of engagement with the course materials. Their levelsof engagement were monitored during the semester.Course DescriptionA junior level software engineering course, CIS 375 (Software Engineering 1), offered by theComputer and Information Science (CIS) department is organized as a 14 week, four credit-hourcourse. This is a required course taken by all computing majors in the CIS department whichincludes: Computer Science (CIS), Software
education, gender issues, women in engineering, students' perceptions,educational innovationIntroductionParticipation of women in the engineering industry is meager, and their under-representation inengineering remains despite the industry's efforts. Attracting more women into the field has notyet been achieved, and their participation is still judged as insufficient by several authors [1].This fact is reflected initially in the low number of women enrolled in careers in the engineeringarea. If we specifically analyze the construction sector, it is not effective to push more women toenter these careers since the percentage of women employed in construction is proportional toincome. The probability that they will finish the degree and serve the
Professoriate (HAGEP) grant in Environmental Sciences and Engineering. The HAGEP grant promotes the expansion of Hispanic doctoral students to faculty at community colleges or teaching intensive universities. Dr. Sivils received his B.S. in microbiology from Tue University of Texas at El Paso (UTEP), worked in the biotechnology field before returning to UTEP to receive his Doctorate in Toxicology, where he studied the compensatory mechanism resulting from the loss of the multi-drug resistance transporters 1 (MRP1). He attained a Post Doctoral position at UTEP where he collaborated in the discovery and development of small molecules used for the treatment of prostate cancer.Dr. Yasser Hassebo, The City University of New York
techniques within virtualsettings.Keywords: Active learning, virtual education, construction scheduling and planning, constructionmanagement, undergraduate educationIntroductionStudents benefit from improved problem solving and critical thinking skills when active learningis employed. Active learning approaches also promote student engagement and facilitatecollaboration. These approaches have been implemented in various Science, Technology,Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) fields, enhancing students' thinking and retention ofmaterial [1, 2]. A study at Auburn University showed sixty-eight percent of the students believean active learning environment enhanced their learning. The same study revealed that eighty-twopercent of the students feel their
engineering educators and administrators who seek to improve the field’s retention ofminoritized and women students. Whereas efforts have been made to recruit minoritized studentsinto engineering, our study points to a clear and crucial role for faculty to play: they can supportminoritized students by fostering a sense of belonging in engineering classrooms. I. IntroductionStudents’ sense of belonging has been a recent focus of some engineering education research dueto the significant role it plays for student experience and success [1,2,3]. A student’s ability todevelop a sense of belonging within the higher education institution has been demonstrated to bea critical factor determining student retention [1]. A sense of belonging can also affect a
reform needed thatconnects creativity to engineering in an atmosphere that welcomes diversity. Introduction Engineering is a creative and diverse profession integral to the sustainability of a rapidlyevolving economy, and a field where the diversity and perspectives of women engineers isessential [1], [2], [3]. This study examined the creative self-efficacy (CSE) of undergraduatewomen engineering majors, their beliefs about creativity, how they describe themselves ascreative, and their lived experiences that influenced them to choose engineering as a career path.ABET [4] highlighted the significant connection of creativity in engineering curriculum to theengineering profession. The creative
include a positive impact on the concerns about computer science betweenpre-test, post-test, and secondary post-test scores. Additionally, there is a relationship betweenspecific micro-credential materials and teacher’s self-confidence at integrating cybersecurityconcepts within their own K-12 classroom. The limitations are included. The study showcasesinnovative and practical tools for teaching cybersecurity, and has implications for teachereducators, technology educators, and those that work in local, state, national educator spaces, andthose creating and implementing professional development. 1. IntroductionToday, not only is cybersecurity one of the fast-growing and most in-demand fields in the UnitedStates, but basic cyber-hygiene is