, theABET Board of Directors adopted the new set of standards, called Engineering Criteria 2000(EC2000). EC2000 shifted the basis for accreditation from input-what is taught, tooutput-what is learned. In 2002, ABET, Inc. commissioned the Center for the Study ofHigher Education at Pennsylvania State University to undertake a three-and-a-half-year studyto assess whether the implementation of the new EC2000 evaluation criteria is having theintended effects.1The weight of the accumulated evidence collected for Engineering Change indicates clearlythat the implementation of the EC2000 accreditation criteria has had a positive, andsometimes substantial, impact on engineering programs, student experiences, and studentlearning. However, the main findings of
skills without thetraditional barriers of calculus and physics that gate the engineering major at the university level.Our course targets students from the arts, humanities, computer sciences, and businessdisciplines, working to improve their technical literacy and help them develop their technicalabilities. Engineering students in non-electrical disciplines have also been attracted to the courseto build their electronics skills for lab work. These skills should better prepare students tomeaningfully engage with technology in their lives and careers after graduation. The pilot studyran during the Fall 2022 semester with 9 enrolled students and an extension and replication iscurrently underway. To recruit more students for future studies, we have
Graduate School Preparation Program,” J. Black Stud., vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 95–112, Mar. 2016, doi: 10.1177/0021934715614206.[20] L. J. Donovan et al., “An NSF-LSAMP Model for the Successful Transition of Underrepresented Students into STEM Majors and Beyond,” presented at the 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Jul. 2021. Accessed: Jan. 01, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/an-nsf-lsamp-model-for-the-successful-transition-of- underrepresented-students-into-stem-majors-and-beyond[21] S. F. Bancroft, S. K. Benson, and E. Johnson-Whitt, “McNair Scholars’ Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Graduate Experience: A Pilot Study,” -West. Educ. Res., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 3–27
population Research, pages 1–16.McGee Banks, C. A. and Banks, J. A. (1995). Equity pedagogy: An essential component of multicultural education. Theory into practice, 34(3):152–158.Oda, S., Yamazaki, A. K., and Inoue, M. (2018). A comparative study on perceptions of cultural diversity in engineering students. In EDULEARN18 Proceedings, pages 5224–5230. IATED.Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (2022). Healthy people 2020: Disparities. US department of health and human services website.Pfeifer, J. H., Masten, C. L., Borofsky, L. A., Dapretto, M., Fuligni, A. J., and Lieberman, M. D. (2009). Neural correlates of direct and reflected self-appraisals in adolescents and adults: When social perspective-taking informs self-perception
engineeringprofessionals, women will need to engage and persist in engineering educational pathways. Thepurpose of this pilot qualitative case study was to examine the educational pathways andexperiences of three undergraduate women who are on track to graduate during the 2019-2020academic year a large, public university located in the southeast region of the United States. Byusing social cognitive career theory, the pilot study examined how and why three womenauthored their engineering identities through their secondary and post-secondary educationalexperiences to gain insight on their pursuit and attainment of an engineering degree and toinform a larger case study. Three themes, congruent with social cognitive career theory emergedfrom the data: eagerness to
Paper ID #22953New Engineers’ First Three Months: A Study of the Transition from Cap-stone Design Courses to WorkplacesChris Gewirtz, Virginia Tech Chris Gewirtz is PhD student in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. His research interests revolve around how culture, history and identity influence assumptions made by engineers in their design practice, and how to change assumptions to form innovative and socially conscious engineers. He is particularly interested in humanitarian engineering design, where many traditional engineering assumptions fall apart.Dr. Daria A. Kotys-Schwartz, University of Colorado, Boulder
.[15] C. Poor and S. Brown, “Increasing retention of women in engineering at WSU: A model for a women’s mentoring program,” Coll. Stud. J., vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 421-428, Sept. 2013[16] P. R. Hernandez, B. Bloodhart, R. T. Barnes, A. S. Adams, S. M. Clinton, I. Pollack, E. Godfrey, M. Burt, and E. V. Fischer, “Promoting professional identity, motivation, and persistence: Benefits of an informal mentoring program for female undergraduate students,” PLoS ONE, vol. 12, no. 11, Nov. 2017, Art. no. E0187531, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187531.[17] O. Pierrakos, T. K. Beam, J. Constantz, A. Johri, and R. Anderson, “On the development of a professional identity: Engineering persisters vs engineering switchers
, 20(3), 324-335.[10] Litzinger, T. A., Lee, S. H., Wise, J. C., & Felder, R. M. (2007). A psychometric study of the index of learning styles©. Journal of Engineering Education, 96(4), 309.[11] Trigwell, K., & Prosser, M. (2004). Development and use of the approaches to teaching inventory. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 409-424.[12] Gibbs, G., & Coffey, M. (2004). The impact of training of university teachers on their teaching skills, their approach to teaching and the approach to learning of their students. Active learning in higher education, 5(1), 87-100.[13] Meyer, J. H., & Eley, M. G. (2006). The approaches to teaching inventory: A critique of its development and applicability. British journal of
learning. Our five-member FLC was formed toinvestigate this critical teaching and learning issue of developing Engineering students’troubleshooting skills and explore the scope and techniques for improving outcomes throughinnovative teaching methods and/or by developing new ancillary learning resources. To achievethe ultimate goal of improving troubleshooting skills, it is important to first assess the currentability of students at troubleshooting and then formulate a plan to invoke improvement measuresin a few courses as a pilot study before a general strategy can be developed to apply to the entireundergraduate curriculum. Our FLC team in this project formulated and focused on the followingrelevant research questions (RQs):RQ1. What did previous
42 54Evaluation Plan A psychology graduate student with expertise in quantitative analysis from the College ofEducation served as the program evaluator for this study under the guidance of Dr. ChuangWang, an education assessment expert and Professor in the College of Education at UNCCharlotte. The evaluation plan, which included both quantitative and qualitative assessmentinstrumentation, was developed to evaluate the educational impacts of flipping specific lectures.The skills, perceptions, and gains developed by student participants in a control group werecompared to the same data collected from the treatment group. While all quantitativeinstrumentation questions were identical for the control and treatment groups
with, and learn from others; thinkcritically about the topics in the context of their positionality, and interrogate the impacts of thesetopics on both their identities and others’.Course implementationThe course was piloted in the fall 2020 semester and was offered in the subsequent spring 2021and fall 2021 semesters. While initially planned as an in-person course, university restrictionsdue to the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in fully remote implementations in the first twosemesters (2020-2021 academic year). Creating a remote course required several considerations.First, class lectures were held via Zoom. However, the university Zoom license did not includeclosed captioning in the 2020-2021 academic year, which meant that students needing it
-319-16169-3_13.[10] J. Love, S. Freeman, and D. Sullivan, “What Sticks with First-Year Engineering Students and Engineering Faculty in STEM Education Service-Learning Projects?,” in 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Indianapolis, Indiana: ASEE Conferences, 2014, p. 24.1369.1-24.1369.13. doi: 10.18260/1-2--23302.[11] M. Regan and S. Sheppard, “Interactive Multimedia Courseware and the Hands‐on Learning Experience: An Assessment Study,” J of Engineering Edu, vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 123–132, 1996, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.1996.tb00221.x.[12] H. A. Aglan and S. F. Ali, “Hands‐On Experiences: An Integral Part of Engineering Curriculum Reform,” J of Engineering Edu, vol. 85, no. 4, pp. 327
methods provide,leading to an effective redesign.Figure 4 lower assembly Figure 5 final assembly4.2 Implication of Study4.2.1 Academia This work has far-reaching implications, both as a significant advancement for educationalfunction and engineering practice. This work offers a scalable approach to the integration ofProject-Based Learning (PBL) and Lean Manufacturing principles to enhance engineeringeducation so students are better prepared for relevant skills that can be put into practiceimmediately. The study highlights the effectiveness of PBL in developing critical thinking, problem-solving, and collaborative skills among engineering graduates. By working on real products like aportable blender
POGIL Employed in aOne Semester Engineering Materials Technology Course. In 2017 ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition, 2017.[32] Phillips, J., Use of POGIL Methodology in Undergraduate Mechanical EngineeringCourses. In 2022 ASEE Illinois-Indiana Section Conference, 2022.[33] Aedi, W. and Masitoh, L., Development of POGIL Based Calculus Module forInformatics Engineering Students. Journal of Education, Teaching and Learning, 5(2), pp.225-228, 2020.[34] Gopal, B., Bockmon, R. and Cooper, S., POGIL-like learning and student's impressionsof software engineering topics: A qualitative study. In PPIG (pp. 154-163), 2022.[35] Gopal, B. and Cooper, S., Pogil-like learning in undergraduate software testing anddevops-a pilot study. In Proceedings of the
engineer to receive the U.S. Campus Compact Thomas Ehrlich FacultyAward for Service-Learning and a co-recipient of the U.S. National Academy of Engineering’s BernardGordon Prize for Innovation in Engineering and Technology Education. He is a fellow of NSPE andASEE and elected to the ASEE Hall of Fame. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024“Work In Progress, Elevating the Unsung Heroes: Assessing Graduate Teaching Assistants'Experiences in Service-Learning Programs”AbstractService-learning programs emphasizing engineering design are frequently recognized for theirpotential to enhance the professional development of students. Such programs are complexnetworks of interconnected components including students
and identity in engineering change after this research experience ● How interaction and communication with graduate student mentors contributes to student sense of belonging.Further, this study raises questions that deserve future study, such as: ● How does mentoring undergrads impact grad students? ● How might training better prepare grad and faculty mentors to supervise REU students? ● Does doing research work contribute to students’ perception of research as a human practice? Given this ability to focus on the nuanced meanings that students draw from theirexperiences, we suggest that this method can better empower students from underrepresentedgroups, whose voices can be buried in large datasets of quantitative
enrollment and persistence in college STEM fields using an expanded P-E fit framework: A large-scale multilevel study.,” J. Appl. Psychol., vol. 99, no. 5, pp. 915–947, 2014.[13] K. E. Winters and H. M. Matusovich, “Career goals and actions of early career engineering graduates,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 1226–1238, 2015.[14] J. P. Martin, D. R. Simmons, and S. L. Yu, “Family roles in engineering undergraduates’ academic and career choices: Does parental educational attainment matter?,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 136–149, 2014.[15] R. L. Kajfez, K. M. Kecskemety, E. S. Miller, K. E. Gustafson, and K. L. Meyers, “First- year engineering students’ perceptions of engineering
Paper ID #8680Changes in Elementary Students’ Engineering Knowledge Over Two Yearsof Integrated Science Instruction (Research to Practice) Strand: Engineeringacross the K-12 curriculum: Integration with the Arts, Social Studies, Sci-ence, and the Common CoreMariana Tafur, Purdue University, West Lafayette Mariana Tafur is a Ph.D. candidate and a graduate assistant in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She has a M.S., education, Los Andes University, Bogota, Colombia; and a B.S., electrical engineering, Los Andes University, Bogota, Colombia. She is a 2010 Fulbright Fellow. Her research interests include
university.Despite these challenges, we believe the PubWRIT course represents a useful approach togearing up engineering students to be stewards of public welfare in their professional roles in thefuture. We encourage others to adopt and adapt these approaches at their own institutions.AcknowledgementsWe would like to acknowledge Musabbiha Zaheer for assistance brainstorming course materialsand identifying pre-class readings and examples. As well, we would like to acknowledge all theparticipants in our study and the U.S. National Science Foundation for their support of thisresearch. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions, or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience
students in a traditional,lecture-based, engineering education experience no significant growth as self-directedlearners. Prior studies by multiple researchers indicate students experiencing PBLcurricula have experienced significant growth. These studies all used the Self-DirectedLearning Readiness Scale (SDLRS), a commercially available tool that has beenadministered to 120,000 adults and as been used in over 90 PhD studies.The researchers developed a qualitative study in an attempt to characterize how the PBLgraduates experienced self-directed learning. 27 PBL graduates were interviewed. Aphenomenographic methodology was used to determine how the graduates experienceSDL in their engineering practice.The result of the qualitative study is a set
touse on a practical and tangible project, and witness first-hand how to apply math and science tosolving an open-ended problem. Additionally, completion of the program and participation inresearch is intended to bolster applications for graduate school and competitive internships/careertracks as well as increase confidence and interest in the field of engineering [3,4,22] and personalidentification with engineering [6]. Professional identity has been studied in STEM fields as ameans of understanding the motivations, interests, and expectations of collegiate students [34]. A secondary focus is to improve retention rates and recruitment of students, especially thosewho are traditionally underrepresented in STEM fields. Prior research shows
started with a textbook sprint forfirst-year mechanics. And Site 2 was working on online problems as part of a larger revamp ofthe first-year engineering curriculum. The sites were connected by an initial request byBCcampus, an agency of the British Columbia government that acts as an umbrella body forpost-secondary institutions. The organization had identified a lack of OER options for first-yearengineering mechanics and wanted to generate collaboration to eventually put together atextbook. The faculty members at each site were contacted through a network of OER-focusedgroups and individuals, both outside of and within engineering.All first-year engineering students at each of our institutions study statics and particle dynamics,and students in
Science and Mechanics, an M.S. in Engineering Mechanics, and a Ph.D. in Biomedical Engineering from Virginia Tech.Dr. Robin D. Anderson, James Madison University Robin Anderson is a Professor and the Academic Unit Head in the Department of Graduate Psychology at James Madison University. Prior to her current position, she served as the Associate Director of JMU’s Center for Assessment and Research Studies. Her research interests include Engineering Education and the assessment of student learning outcomes in higher education. Page 24.597.1 c American Society for Engineering Education
some changes that were made to Quiz 2 incomparison to the other two quizzes could be associated with the increased scores, but there wasno data collected on each question response for this study. The tracking of individual answersmay constitute a prudent modification for future iterations of this study so that deeperunderstanding of patterns in performance may inform conclusions about the game interventionfrom experimental results. For example, a piloted set of standard quizzes that could be assessedto cover identical competencies (not merely similar ones) may provide a more reliablemeasurement tool of students’ understanding of course material.ConclusionsIn this study, we used a pretest-posttest quasi-experimental method with switching
historical context using a variety of instructional modes and pedagogicalinnovations.This paper presents the experience of developing and teaching MMW for the first time in 2020 inthe midst of the COVID-19 pandemic. MMW was designed and co-taught by an interdisciplinaryfaculty teaching team from the departments of history, theology, and environmental science. As adesignated “Complex Problems” course, a type of first-year interdisciplinary Core course, MMWoffered 70 students the opportunity to satisfy BC’s Core requirements in Natural Science andHistory through three linked pedagogical components: lectures, labs, and reflection sessions. Ourgoal was to integrate engineering, the history of science and technology studies, and ethical andmoral modes of
) identityQualitative studies have more consistently presented a nuanced picture of how gender and racecan inform engineering (leadership) identity within both academic and workplace settings.Examining student engineering identities at a US university through ethnography, Tonso drewattention to the way one woman remained an invisible engineer in her community despitedemonstrated competency and versatility. Because this student’s performance of her ‘engineerself’ did not align with the few culturally produced or accepted engineering identities reservedfor women on campus (most were uncomplimentary), she was ‘othered’ and remainedunrecognized. Indications were that this student will likely leave engineering post graduation[19].In another study, Du found women at
digital rhetoric, has appeared in venues like Across the Disciplines, Composition Forum, Studies in Higher Education, The WAC Journal, and The Writing Center Journal. He is active in national organizations like the Association for Writing Across the Curriculum, the Conference on College Composition and Communication, and the WAC Clearinghouse, and he is a founding member of the RhetAI Coalition.Jordan Harshman, Auburn University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Work-in-Progress: Aerospace Engineering Faculty’s Perspective on the Writing SySTEM for Increasing Self-Efficacy of Graduate Student WritersAbstractFew graduate students receive sustained, discipline-specific foundational
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Design and Assessment of the Social Responsibilities of Researchers Graduate Training Program at the University of Notre DameWhy Social Responsibilities? “Ethics” is, by now, recognized as a necessary and important part of the training of bothundergraduate and graduate engineering students. But the word can mean different things indifferent contexts. While as received from philosophy the term is profoundly broad, coveringeverything from making good decisions to living the good life, when it enters the engineeringeducation context considerations beyond immediate pragmatic concerns tend to fall away.Engineering ethics education at both the undergraduate and graduate levels
.[14] Kang, N. H. (2008). Learning to teach science: Personal epistemologies, teaching goals, and practices of teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(2), 478-498.[15] Montfort, D., Brown, S., & Shinew, D. (2014). The personal epistemologies of civil engineering faculty. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(3), 388-416.[16] Carberry, A., Ohland, M., & Swan, C. (2010, June). A pilot validation study of the epistemological beliefs assessment for engineering (EBAE): First year engineering student beliefs. In 2010 Annual Conference & Exposition (pp. 15-71).[17] Corlett, S., & Mavin, S. (2018). Reflexivity and researcher positionality. The SAGE handbook of qualitative business and management research methods
for K-12 Engineering Education? National Academies Press.27. Museum of Science. Engineering is Elementary. Available from: http://www.eie.org/eie- curriculum.28. Massachusetts Department of Education, (2006) Massachusetts Science and Technology/Engineering Curriculum Framework, Malden, MA: Massachusetts Department of Education.29. Kucuk, S. and B. Sisman, (2017) “Behavioral patterns of elementary students and teachers in one- to-one robotics instruction,” Computers and Education, 111: p. 31-43.30. Liu, E.Z.-F., et al., (2013) “An analysis of teacher-student interaction patterns in a robotics course for kindergarten children: A pilot study,” Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology