Management and Engineering Management programs. His courses at these institutions have included Lean Construction, Total Quality Management, Quality Control Systems, and Construction Productivity Improvement. As a Principal Consultant with Harding Associates Inc., of Miami, Dr. Forbes provides lean and quality improvement solutions for the construction, service, and manufacturing industries. His book ”Modern Construction: Lean Project Delivery and Integrated Practices” (Forbes and Ahmed, 2010, CRC Press), is an internationally recognized reference. He has published and presented many papers internationally on the application of lean techniques and quality initiatives in the construction environment. In previous
research focus is developing and teaching Android App development to engineers and entrepreneurs with innovative tools that can be utilized by programming novices.Prof. Luke Nogales, New Mexico State University Luke Nogales loves to help innovators reach their potential. Luke is an Assistant Professor in the En- gineering Technology department at New Mexico State University (NMSU) and an Enterprise Advisor at NMSU’s on-campus incubator, the Arrowhead Center. He teaches core mechanical engineering tech- nology courses and is developing innovation and product development curriculum for the College of Engineering and the College of Business. He is an advisor and co-founder of NMSU’s Aggie Innovation Space. Prior to working
a teaching and learning community that spans the disciplines. 3. Dedicating time in departmental faculty meetings to first personalize the vision of this proposal for their department and then to share teaching pedagogies tried in classes as well as techniques for implementing classroom changes, thus creating learning organizations within each department.The three routines described are focused on continuous learning and improvement. They developnew ideas that lead to changes. Furthermore, they make continual changes to the overallstructure, seek grassroots innovation, and involve people with different views, thus increasingbuy-in among the major stakeholders. The passing of expertise in integrating active learning intoSTEM curriculum is
Paper ID #16543On the Use of Outcomes to Connect Students to an Engineering Identity, Cul-ture, and CommunityProf. Rebecca A. Bates, Minnesota State University, Mankato Rebecca A. Bates received the Ph.D. degree in electrical engineering from the University of Washington in 2004. She also received the M.T.S. degree from Harvard Divinity School in 1993. She is currently a Professor in the Department of Integrated Engineering program at Minnesota State University, Mankato, home of the Iron Range and Twin Cities Engineering programs. She is also a program director at the National Science Foundation for TCUP and HBCU-UP in
accessto physical lab equipment.One hallmark of an engineering technology program is hands-on laboratory experience. In fact,the criteria for accrediting engineering technology programs specify that theory courses shouldbe accompanied by coordinated laboratory experiences. A laboratory course accompanies almostevery electronics engineering technology course in the IET curriculum at East CarolinaUniversity. In these laboratories, students design and construct electronic circuits and machines,then use electrical test equipment to measure the characteristics of the constructed circuits andmachines to compare their findings with theory presented in the corresponding lecture courses. Atypical hands-on laboratory station provides the student with a
of internationalization inhigher education given by Dr. Jane Knight, who described it as a process of integrating aninternational dimension into teaching, research and service.5, 6, 7There have also been many professors from U.S. universities who have gone overseas to helpmake improvements to global higher education, who play important roles in global highereducation, and who provide services for changes to be implemented into the education systemsof other countries. This also serves as an opportunity for the U.S. professors to be able to learnabout other educational systems worldwide and then identify best practices that they canincorporate into their own educational system.8There are also many cultural benefits that can beobtained by the
IOE system integration. Logging to or control from remote servers, cloud or smart phones 15 Review and Finals Table 1 – Internet of Everything Course TopicsAs one can see from the table, the course starts with a quick overview of the general concepts ofthe IoT. Since there are no prerequisites for the course, some time is spent on an overview ofbasic electronics concepts and components including basic control elements and sensors. Focusthen shifts to the Raspberry Pi platform and its operation and capabilities. How one interfaces tothe Raspberry Pi is covered in detail including the interfacing of the Arduino platform. Usinghome automation as a framework to look at IoT
ways of doing things can be discovered” (p. 126). The un-programmatic programs described in this paper seek to create such an environment.Next Steps: Developing an Intellectual Model for Integrating Creative Thinking andProblem Definition with Planning and Implementation ProcessesThe model we have arrived at broadens the back end of the entrepreneurial process byexpanding, deepening, and diversifying the activities that precede the creation of a business plan.The model is depicted visually below. STEP 1 - Socio Technical Systems Thinking! STEP 2 – Design Thinking Culture! Technology! STEP 5 – Business Plan Organiza3on! STEP 3 – Customer
ofcollaboration technologies. Although there has been great emphasis on developing collaborationcompetencies in the engineering curriculum, empirical evidence of successful strategies fordistributed team settings is scarce. As an attempt to fill this gap this study investigates theimpact of a scalable intervention in developing virtual collaboration skills. The intervention,based on instructional scaffolds embedded with collaboration technologies, is aimed atsupporting specific processes including planning, goal setting, clarifying goals and expectations,communication, coordination and progress monitoring. A quasi-experimental design was used toevaluate the impact of the intervention on student teamwork skills. Data from 278 graduate andundergraduate
need of essential skills, recruit and train a labor pool in need of these skills and competencies,and break down the traditional mindset of only one pathway from education to the technicalworkforce.Cost effective program modelThrough TRANSFORM, we have partnered with industry to develop an AdvancedManufacturing curriculum specifically addressing the technical skills gap liberal arts majorsmight have, being mindful of the skills they already hold. Building on current workforce trainingguidelines and through review of existing associate level course content we have developed ayearlong intensive program of study and workplace skill development offered at a price pointpalatable to those struggling with current student loan debt. The program
increased engagement with the material, students oftenselect research topics based not on interest, but rather on the availability of information1.The Introductory Engineering CourseIntroduction to the Engineering Profession (EGS 1006L) is a one-credit course offered tostudents entering the engineering curriculum at FGCU. When this course was first created, it wasdone so within a brand new school of engineering. As such, “Introduction to the EngineeringProfession” was originally developed to provide an overview of the engineering programs atFGCU, and encourage students to consider engineering as a potential career choice. In Fall 2014,the course was revised to provide a more cohesive, meaningful first year experience that tied intothe pedagogical
Paper ID #15424Time and Cost Analysis of Implementing a Mechatronic Experience in an En-gineering Technology CourseMr. John R Haughery, Iowa State University John Haughery is currently a graduate fellow in the department of Agriculture and Biosystems Engineer- ing at Iowa State University, where he is pursuing a PhD in Industrial and Agricultural Technology. His technical experience and interests include electrical energy systems, industrial controls, and mechatron- ics. Currently he is researching the integration of mechatronic-based projects into freshman engineering and technology curricula with the intent of
Spring 2016 Mid‐Atlantic ASEE Conference, April 8‐9, 2016 GWU under the direction of industry professionals, with overall guidance from a faculty advisor whocoordinates the program.The internship program was triggered in 1998 by the electrical engineering program faculty’sdecision to develop a curriculum that includes a required one credit internship program whilepromoting early internship during the timeframe spanning the second semester of the sophomoreand the first semester of the junior year. Gradually, as the program gained acceptance by localcompanies, the program faculty decided to build upon the success of the early internshipprogram by allowing the substitution of an additional optional
how people learn. Making Learning Whole3 is an example of aninstructional framework that integrates many of the latest findings on how people learn, andproposes seven principles on how to design an individual or set of learning experiences in waysthat facilitate comprehensive learning in a variety of course designs. Perkins describes his approach as learning by wholes and uses a sports metaphor toexpound on the following seven principles: 1) Play the Whole Game; 2) Make the Game WorthPlaying; 3) Work on the Hard Parts; 4) Play Out of Town; 5) Uncover the Hidden Game; 6)Learn From the Team; and 7) Learn the Game of Learning. Each of these will be described inlayman’s terms. “Play the Whole Game” speaks to the need to design
Paper ID #15559STEMChoice: An Examination of Program Evaluation Data in a STEM-Centered, Inquiry-Based ProgramMr. Terrance Denard Youngblood, Texas Tech University Terrance D. Youngblood is a doctoral student in Educational Psychology at Texas Tech University, spe- cializing in the effective evaluation and assessment of educational outreach programs and workforce de- velopment.Ibrahim Halil Yeter, Texas Tech University IIbrahim H. Yeter is currently a PhD candidate in the Curriculum and Instruction program at the College of Education, and at the same time, he is pursuing his Master’s degree in Petroleum Engineering at
interest. Successful transition from analysis to design willenhance students’ ability to perform well in the capstone course where integration of knowledgeand skills is required in solve design problems.Students’ analytical skills and disciplinary knowledge play an important role in innovation in thecontext of mechanical design education.1 Efforts have been made to investigate the type ofknowledge, acquired across the undergraduate time span, students use when making designdecisions. The open-end nature of mechanical design problem requires students to “think out ofthe box,” deal with multiple choices and make trade-offs according to requirements. It wasreported that design teams in the capstone courses offer a higher number of decisions per
Paper ID #15970Redesigning Engineering Education in Chile: How Selective Institutions Re-spond to an Ambitious National ReformDr. Sergio Celis, Universidad de Chile Sergio Celis is an Assistant Professor in the School of Engineering and Sciences at the Universidad de Chile. He conducts research on higher education, with a focus on teaching and learning in STEM fields. His primary research interest is in how multiple forces, internal and external to the institution, influence what and how we teach in colleges and universities. His doctoral thesis investigated how social and intellectual movements influenced the
) educators have soughtinnovative ways for integrating technology in teaching and learning to engage and build theinterest of secondary school students in STEM disciplines as well as to capture their imaginationabout STEM careers. Recent technological advancements have allowed design, development,and commercialization of low-cost mini unmanned aerial vehicles (MUAV) that offer a noveland ideal platform to support STEM disciplines in high school classrooms.1 This paper focuseson one illustrative example wherein four sections of a 9th grade quantitative research course,consisting of 25 to 30 students each, were engaged by a graduate researcher through an ARParrot 2.0 (see Figure 1) MUAV-based lab activity, which considered the research question“How
Paper ID #14692Alternate Assessments to Support Formative Evaluations in an AsynchronousOnline Computer Engineering Graduate CourseMs. Ritushree Chatterjee, Iowa State University Ritushree Chatterjee is an Instructional Development Specialist working at Engineering-LAS Online Learning at Iowa State University. She did her undergraduate in Chemistry from Delhi University, In- dia and subsequently received her MS in Environmental Chemistry from Iowa State University. She received her second MS in Education with specialization in Curriculum and Instructional Technology and her Instructional Design certificate from Iowa
requires four stages, as shown inclockwise-order in Figure 1: 1. Tangible, concrete learning experience (Do Something) 4. Experimentation and testing 2. Reflection on the learning (Plan and adapt) experience (Think about it) 3. Generalization of the learning to broader applications (Make conclusions) Figure 1 Four stages of Kolb’s experiential learning cycle5.Experiential learners are actively engaged directly with their environment – the industrialengineering workplace in this case. The learner is an integral and
mechanics related to fracture, composite materials and glaciology. In recent years, he has focused on issues of mathematical education and outreach and he has developed a wide range of K-12 outreach projects. His current interests include the mathematical education of teachers, the scholarship of outreach, computational mathematics, and complex dynamics.Dr. Sonya E. Sherrod, Texas Tech University Sonya Sherrod holds a B.S. and an M.A. in mathematics and a Ph.D. in curriculum and instruction. Her research interests include instructional approaches that help students (K-12) learn mathematics concep- tually and instructional strategies that motivate preservice teachers to relearn mathematics conceptually, to empower
Paper ID #16789Social Consciousness in Engineering Students: An Analysis of Freshmen De-sign Project AbstractsMaya Rucks, Louisiana Tech University Maya Rucks is an engineering education doctoral student at Louisiana Tech University. She received her bachelor’s degree in mathematics from the University of Louisiana at Monroe. Her areas of interest include, minorities in engineering, K-12 engineering, and engineering curriculum development.Dr. Marisa K. Orr, Louisiana Tech University Dr. Orr is an Assistant Professor in Mechanical Engineering and Associate Director of the Integrated STEM Education Research Center (ISERC) at
preparation for subsequent courses4. To overcome learning drawbacks from the traditional lecturing techniques, instructors ofan analog electronic circuits’ course implemented problem-based learning. In their study theyused the approach not only to build on students’ acquaintances, but also on theircompetences5. The authors of this study describe the course as an innovative course inelectric circuit theory as they introduced systematic changes in lab instruction to makestudents understand the relationship between theory and real circuits. They integrated the labsessions and the problem-solving sessions to give students new ways to handle the subjectmatter. Instead of focusing on what to report, the students in this course focused on what isto be
, is thoroughly analyzed. Several past projects in electricalengineering, engineering-mechanical, and engineering technology programs are presented, whichwere developed from the students’ daily life, research needs, and industry/community needs.Honors projects that integrate multiple contracts and courses across the curriculum and gradelevels are discussed. Suggestions for improving the Honors contracts pathway are also presented.This paper aims to serve as a reference to inspire more ideas from the faculty who have mentoredhonors students.BackgroundHonors Programs and Honors Colleges are similar in that they require an honors curriculum oreducational frameworks where students need to satisfy requirements in order to graduate with anHonors
young minds to engineering careers includingtransportation. The literature documents that experiential learning approaches are extremelyeffective in this regard5. That is when context-based (or authentic) educational strategies that linkreal-world situations to concepts and principles are adopted by teachers. Such approaches areextremely effective at helping students attain a deeper and long-term understanding of thesubject materials, which in turn stir their interest in their learning environment.The Next Generation Science Standards emphasize inquiry-based curriculum, instruction, andassessment and provide guidelines for science teaching and learning. Science inquiry“encompasses not only an ability to engage in inquiry but an understanding of
Paper ID #14436An Engineering Mathematics Course to Improve Success of Students in Al-gebra IIDr. Edmund Tsang, Western Michigan University Edmund Tsang received a B.S. with distinction in Mechanical Engineering from University of Nebraska and a Ph.D. in Metallurgy from Iowa State University. Dr. Tsang’s current professional interests include integrating service-learning into engineering, social entrepreneurship, and student success and retention.Kenneth David Domingue, Western Michigan University Kenneth Domingue is currently a graduate student in Aerospace Engineering at Western Michigan Uni- versity. As a graduate
Learning Research Center (DLRC)Dr. Edward J. Berger, Purdue University, West Lafayette Edward Berger is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education and Mechanical Engineering at Purdue University, joining Purdue in August 2014. He has been teaching mechanics for nearly 20 years, and has worked extensively on the integration and assessment of specific technology interventions in mechanics classes. He was one of the co-leaders in 2013-2014 of the ASEE Virtual Community of Practice (VCP) for mechanics educators across the country.Mr. Nick Stites, Purdue University, West Lafayette Nick Stites is pursuing a PhD in Engineering Education at Purdue University. His research interests include the development of novel
not, many students work in teams to better build the project. This teamcollaboration demonstrates to the students the importance of teamwork. Team building isimportant in construction education as teams are an integral part of the construction process.Figure 2 shows students working together as a team to try to build a tower. Figure 2 Students work together to create a successful
got to a certain result, need an integral vision.The Felder-Silverman ILS has been utilized in many studies of engineering students. It wasdeveloped by Dr. Felder, a professor of chemical engineering and initially utilized in hischemical engineering classes. Since its creation, it has been used in most disciplines ofengineering study. In a search of the ASEE conference proceeding from 2000 to 2006, Litzingeret al. [30] found hundreds of articles on learning styles and nearly 50 utilized the ILS in theirclassroom and research. The ILS is a respected and well know instrument in the engineeringeducation industry. It is also considered to be easily administered and more easily understood byits participants than
Engineering (WECE) study. Cathy received her S.B. in cognitive science from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and her Ph.D. in educational psychology from Stanford University.Dr. Christine M. Cunningham, Museum of Science Dr. Christine Cunningham is an educational researcher who works to make engineering and science more relevant, accessible, and understandable, especially for underserved and underrepresented populations. A vice president at the Museum of Science, Boston since 2003, she founded and directs Engineering is ElementaryTM , a groundbreaking project that integrates engineering concepts into elementary curriculum and teacher professional development. As of September 2014, EiE has served 6.2 million