new hybrid masters program combining medicine and en- gineering and also has led multiple curricular initiative in Bioengineering and the College of Engineering on several NSF funded projects.Gabriella R Dupont, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign I am a MEng student in Bioengineering, with a BS, Bioengineering, both from University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. I am interested in biomechanics and how curriculum structure affects education outcomes. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Creating an Engineering-based medical school to address a critical gap in medical innovationIntroductionHealthcare and medicine will change dramatically in
-level engineers when encountering electromagnetics material. Thispreliminary study focuses on electrostatics content in a junior level electromagnetism course inan Electrical Engineering (EE) program. Students find electromagnetism to be one of the mostdifficult courses in the upper-level EE curriculum. Electromagnetics is difficult for students tolearn due to the required competency with vector calculus. Topics are especially challenging toteach without tangible applications [3].The authors created an active learning environment within a junior-level Electromagneticscourse by utilizing in-class tutorials with an electronic response system. The intent was toincrease student’s ability and confidence in performing vector calculus required to
worked with a group to develop focus control for an OCT system. Currently Dr. Himmer is the facility manager at the Montana Mircofabrication Facility and he continues to research novel materials, actuators and optics that may be used in the development of optical systems. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Work in Progress - Group Laboratory Experiment during Lecture in an Undergraduate Fluid Dynamics Class: Increasing Student Learning and Communication SkillsAbstract: Laboratory classes in engineering often occur toward the end of curriculum, excludingtheir benefits from the core class while it is being taught. Instead of a full laboratory,presentations and in
; and the ASME C. D. Mote Jr., Early Career Award. In 2014 Dr. Rhoads was included in ASEE Prism Magazine’s 20 Under 40.Dr. Edward J. Berger, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Edward Berger is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education and Mechanical Engineering at Purdue University, joining Purdue in August 2014. He has been teaching mechanics for over 20 years, and has worked extensively on the integration and assessment of specific technology interventions in mechanics classes. He was one of the co-leaders in 2013-2014 of the ASEE Virtual Community of Practice (VCP) for mechanics educators across the country. His current research focuses on student problem-solving pro
Paper ID #244072018 ASEE Mid-Atlantic Section Spring Conference: Washington, District ofColumbia Apr 6Setting a Course for Student Success: Standards-Based Curriculum and Capacity-Building across Risk Prevention Management System DomainsDr. Lisa L Greenwood, Rochester Institute of Technology Dr. Lisa Greenwood is an assistant professor in the Department of Civil Engineering Technology, Envi- ronmental Management and Safety at the Rochester Institute of Technology. Dr. Greenwood has been involved in national and international environmental standards development for over 15 years, and re- cently led the U.S. delegation on
University. He received his B.S. (2005), M.S. (2008), and Ph.D. (2012) from Michigan State University. His area of expertise is in cementitious composites which includes: fracture and fatigue mechanics of quasi-brittle materials, recycled concrete, conductive concrete, reinforced concrete, pervious concrete, geopolymer, and structural dynamics. He currently teaches a wide array of courses that includes statics, reinforced concrete design, structural analysis, and materials engineering. Dr. Brake actively integrates project based and peer assisted learning pedagogies into his curriculum.Dr. Xianchang Li, Lamar University Dr. Li received his Ph.D. degree from Clemson University in 1999 and now serves as an associate profes
Paper ID #22429Work in Progress: An Analysis of Correlations in Student Performance inCore Technical Courses at a Large Public Research Institution’s Electricaland Computer Engineering DepartmentMr. Christopher Robbiano, Colorado State University Chris Robbiano is currently a PhD student in the Electrical and Computer Engineering department at Colorado State University. He received a BS degree in electrical engineering and a BS degree in physics in 2011, as well as an MS in electrical engineering in 2017 from Colorado State University. His current areas of interest are statistical signal processing and engineering education.Dr
developed that facilitates integration of these products inexisting civil engineering curriculum. The SHRP 2 Education Connection program serves as anexcellent pedagogical tool to each civil engineering student by providing knowledge of SHRP2products and their impacts on community before they start their careers as transportation engineer.In the first round of SHRP2 Education Connection, faculty members from Rowan University hadsuccessfully integrated (SHRP2) solutions and products in the CEE curriculum (i.e., in fall 2015and spring 2016 semesters). Mehta et al [1] reported that the vertical integration of SHRP2 products from freshman year todoctoral level resulted, not only in an increased understanding of the role of each SHRP2 productin
Paper ID #23962Elements that Support and Hinder the Development and Implementation ofa School-wide/District-wide STEM Integration Program (Evaluation)Dr. Mia Dubosarsky, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Dr. Mia Dubosarsky has been a science and STEM educator for more than 20 years. Her experience in- cludes founding and managing a science enrichment enterprise, developing informal science curriculum for young children, supporting Native American teachers in the development of culturally responsive sci- ence and math lessons, developing and teaching graduate level courses on assessment in science education, and working with
Paper ID #21651Bridging the Gap: a Co-taught Field Course with Integrated History andCivil Engineering ContentDr. Charles Riley P.E., Oregon Institute of Technology Dr. Riley has been teaching mechanics concepts for over 10 years and has been honored with both the ASCE ExCEEd New Faculty Excellence in Civil Engineering Education Award (2012) and the Beer and Johnston Outstanding New Mechanics Educator Award (2013). While he teaches freshman to graduate- level courses across the civil engineering curriculum, his focus is on engineering mechanics. He imple- ments classroom demonstrations at every opportunity as part of an
lecture course. “Unit Operations Lab” or “Junior / Senior Lab” are common examples of this type of course. This survey is primarily focused on courses of this type. Clinic An integrative experiential hands-on-course that serves as the experimental lab for all other courses taken that semester. This survey is not focused on experiences of this type. Lab / Bench / The definition of what constitutes “pilot” scale varies by industry and type of Pilot Scale product. For the purposes of this survey, we will define “pilot” scale as one with working volumes significantly in excess of those one would typically encounter in a chemistry
academic quality. • Demonstrate accountability. • Encourage, where appropriate, self-scrutiny and planning for change and needed improve- ment. • Employ appropriate and fair procedures in decision making. • Demonstrate ongoing review of accreditation practice. • Possess sufficient resources.This clarifies ABET’s role as one of accrediting programs through a focus on continuous im-provement, curriculum, student outcomes, skilled faculty, and adequately resourced programs.The accreditation criteria discussed above makes that clear. While compliance with federal lawsis important, it is not regarded as an indication of a commitment to continuous improvement andexcellence in education. Furthermore, since ABET accredits programs
engineering. Then we provide a background on the way we integratetechnical content into knowledge integration activities and how we plan to integrate ethics intothat framework. Finally we talk about a method to assess the effectiveness of our study.Ethics Education in EngineeringOne of the major thrusts in engineering education is to develop students’ professional skills thatgo beyond the traditional technical curriculum [3]. Ethics education is a very important part ofany engineering program. ABET requires that all programs seeking accreditation mustdemonstrate that their graduates have an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility[4].Integrating professional skills into the technical content of engineering curriculum has alwaysbeen a
RTOS and introduce basic theoretic topics intheir microcontroller courses. As a result, students who have a good understanding of theory andconcepts of RTOS do not have the opportunity to map their knowledge onto real-worldimplementations. To bridge the gap between conceptual understanding and concreteimplementations, an embedded RTOS educational platform has been established for EETstudents in the Department of Engineering Technology & Industrial Distribution at Texas A&MUniversity as well as in the Engineering Technology program at Northern Kentucky University.This paper only focuses on hardware design and development of the embedded RTOS platform.The laboratory curriculum development and student learning outcomes/feedback will
applications. Several EE professors had agreedupon a System Engineering curriculum scheme (See Figure 2). At the yearend of2013, the capstone DCS then was renamed as“Dynamic System Simulation andImplementation (DSSI).”DSSI aimed to help students synthesize and integrate skillsand knowledge acquired throughout the SE course.Figure 2: An illustration (at round 0) of System Engineering curriculum scheme that categorizes 100-300 courses into cornerstone, keystone and capstone, respectively.Self-improvement from round 0 to round 1From round 0 to round 1, the DCS professor decided to do self-reflection on previousSC syllabus and examination of System Engineering course structure. Figure 3 listsfour standard steps in system engineering design shown in
inherently safer design. 4. Understand how to control and mitigate hazards to prevent accidents. 5. Be familiar with the major regulations that impact the safety of chemical plants. 6. Understand the consequences of chemical plant incidents due to acute and chronic chemical releases and exposures. 7. Be reasonably proficient with at least one hazard identification procedure. 8. Have an introduction to the process of hazard evaluation and risk assessment. While these eight outcomes specify what needs to be covered, they do not specify where theseoutcomes should be covered in the curriculum. In 1999, Anton Pintar (Michigan TechnicalUniversity) discussed whether to integrate chemical process safety into the
whose students took these international assessments. Nationally, this achievementgap is mirrored in the lower performance of African-Americans and Hispanics students incomparison to White students as seen in both the PISA Report2 and national assessments3. Thereare several reasons cited in literature4-6 for this achievement gap. Some of these reasons are socio-economic status, strength of curriculum and disparity between school districts. In addition to thesestructural challenges, student engagement and motivation play an important role in learning. Thepedagogical approach in the classroom has a strong impact on students’ engagement with thelearning materials. Students’ cognitive engagement with the learning materials increases if theyrecognize
Paper ID #22097Engagement in Practice: the Student Engagement Continuum (SEC) – Op-portunities and Challenges for a Sustainable Pipeline Enhancement Model atan Urban InstitutionDr. Gregory E. Triplett, Virginia Commonwealth University Triplett is a Professor and Associate Dean of Graduate Studies and Research at Virginia Commonwealth University (VCU). Triplett oversees all aspects of graduate engineering programs including curriculum de- velopment, student recruitment and matriculation, strategic planning, student funding, graduate research, and online education. Prior to being Associate Dean, Triplett was Director of
Paper ID #21094Economic and Pedagogical Analysis of an Alternative Model of EngineeringEducationDr. R. Alan Cheville, Bucknell University Alan Cheville studied optoelectronics and ultrafast optics at Rice University, followed by 14 years as a faculty member at Oklahoma State University working on ultrafast optoelectronics and engineering edu- cation. While at Oklahoma State, he led a major curriculum reform initiative. After serving for two and a half years as a program director in engineering education at the National Science Foundation, he took a chair position in electrical engineering at Bucknell University. He is
Paper ID #22624Using Lean Principles to Improve an Engineering Technology AssessmentProcessProf. Kevin R. Cook, Montana State University Kevin Cook is an Associate Professor in the Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering at Montana State University with primary teaching responsibilities supporting the Mechanical Engineering Technology (MET) program. He also serves as the Curriculum Coordinator of the Mechanical and Indus- trial Engineering Department, supporting curricular activities of the MET, Mechanical Engineering and Industrial and Management Systems Engineering programs. Mr. Cook holds a B.S. degree in
collaborationand begin to situate the experience of the student-instructor in STEM outreach as an important,but largely unexplored, area of pedagogical interest.Undergraduate engineering students from the State University of New York at Binghamton spentsummers with the Engineering Outreach Office at the University of Toronto to gain insight andexperience into the processes and operations of a long-standing outreach program. Uponreturning to their home institution, the students deployed this knowledge by developing anddelivering curriculum locally. We outline the progress to date and discuss the elements of this‘apprenticeship model’ aimed at developing new outreach programs focused on STEM literacyand engagement. Logistics associated with the
focus of all programs arebased on the goal of increasing within graduating students, job specific skills and improvedindustry awareness, which will make the students better suited to fill the present workforce gapmore quickly upon hire. The pilot program was focused in three main areas: slightly enhancedcourses from the engineering technology curriculum, a company and industry specificminimester course and an internship program. The paper also describes a unique industry-university partnership example that includes industry-site course offerings to develop jobspecific skills that expand to the project management level workforce. In an industry centric andcompany specialized minimester course, the students stay at a state-of-the-art, remote
students that are effective and authentic to the discipline. Much of this work has been centered on model-based inquiry and the integration of scientific practices in a supportive and structured way. He has been funded by NSF and other agencies to conduct research on preservice teacher education, undergraduate engineering education, and community partnerships in secondary education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018The Challenges and Affordances of Engineering Identity as an Analytic LensAbstractIn this theory paper, we seek to review recent scholarship on the construct of engineering identityto help identify the challenges and affordances of its use in engineering education research
these codes were written [4, 5]. Yarmus [18] and Russell [17] articulate the first line ofthinking. While there are differences in the tones of their arguments, both argue that engineers’ professional societies should use their members’ technical integrity and exemplary ethics as ameans of raising the status and stature of the profession. Unfortunately, by framing engineers’professional integrity as an unwavering platform upon which enhanced occupational statusshould be advocated, they leave little space for critique or improvement in this realm.Hill et al. and Andrews adopt the second line of reasoning. In contrast to Yarmus and Russell,these authors accept that engineers have room for improvement when it comes to ethicalconduct, but by
. Therefore, 10 universities (two more than those in 2015) fromChina were selected, proving the outstanding general power of China’s engineeringdisciplines.Main Issues in the Higher Engineering EducationIn terms of the cultivation concept, science and education has not been integrated yet and thephenomenon of “non-engineering” teachers still remains serious. Currently, the faculty teamof China is lacking in “double-qualified” teachers who have both an abundant engineeringbackground and a high academic level [4]. Under the influence of the competitive scientificresearch mechanism and the strategy of promoting the universities to transform the scientificand technological fruits, some universities, including especially those engineeringuniversities and
around engineering activities, engineering education in informal settings, and STEM integration within engineering contexts. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Title: Examining Children’s Engineering Practices during an Engineering Activity in a Designed Learning Setting: A Focus on Troubleshooting AbstractChildren spend most of their time in out-of-school settings. As a result, informal learning settingscan play a significant role in children’s learning development. Museums and science centers areinformal settings that are intentionally designed to promote learning and interest development.Studies show that these settings are where
Appendix B. We eliminated publications that used T-shaped to Deleted: Eliminatingdescribe an object or junction (rather than an individual or a curriculum); the yielded data Deleted: tshowed a big increase in papers on the topic between 2014 and 2015 and a significant increase in Deleted: that 3 the number of divisions whose programs included papers on the topic between 2014 and 2017.These numbers are discussed in the following section of the paper. Commented [NKA(5]: These additions are intended to
approach in a high school setting would develop his/herdesign mindset readily when compared to problems provided in a traditional textbook. Forexample, take the basketball throwing example in Chapter 3 of Coletta (Physics FundamentalsPhysics Curriculum & Instruction; 2nd edition 2010)) and ask how to launch a food packageonto a third floor balcony in a street flooding situation. A displayed trend on a graph of locationversus angle or speed would demonstrate an understanding of the projectile motion knowledge.A subsequent imposition of a constraint on the food delivery boat such as oscillatory water levelwould require an iterated design with some appropriate assumptions. Another example would bethe L-shape arm bio-mechanical model where a
and Associate Provost in Hawaii; a College Director in Abu Dhabi, UAE; an Associate Professor and Assistant Provost in northern California; and an Assistant Professor and Director of Faculty Development in Florida. He has authored a textbook, an an- thology and published over 130 academic articles as well as offered hundreds of academic presentations. He has earned a B.S. in Oceanography from Florida Institute of Technology; an M.S. in Environmen- tal Engineering Sciences and a Ph.D. in Science Education from the University of Florida. Dr. Hargis’ research agenda focuses on how people learn while integrating appropriate, relevant and meaningful in- structional technologies. c American
Rod Foist, Xuping Xu, Timothy Gage, Seth Truitt, and Matthias Schmidt California Baptist University, rfoist@calbaptist.edu, xxu@ calbaptist.edu, MatthiasHans.Schmidt@calbaptist.edu, TimothyDean.Gage@calbaptist.edu, Seth.Truitt@calbaptist.eduAbstract – Recent National Science Foundation (NSF) Chu’s work is motivated by an earlier 5-year study ofresearch, aimed at improving the Electrical and engineering education [2] which found a deficiency in theComputer Engineering (ECE) curriculum across all four curricula: subjects are taught in isolation, without properyears, makes strategic use of laboratory projects. The context, and do not adequately prepare students