Paper ID #8868The use of metacognitive writing-to-learn prompts in an engineering staticsclass to improve student understanding and performanceDr. Saryn R. Goldberg, Hofstra University Dr. Saryn R. Goldberg is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering in Hofstra University’s School of Engineering and Applied Sciences. Dr. Goldberg received her Sc.B. in Engineering with a focus on materials science from Brown University, her M.S. degree in Biomedical Engineering with a focus on biomaterials from Northwestern University, and her Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering with a focus on biomechanics from Stanford University. At
Paper ID #34271Mentoring and Advising Students in an S-STEM Project: Strengths Trainingfrom a Social Justice Perspective in Engineering & Computer Science asContext – Initial ImplementationDr. Jane L. Lehr, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Jane Lehr is a Professor in Ethnic Studies and Women’s and Gender Studies and Director of the Office of Student Research at California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo. She is affiliated faculty in Computer Science and Software Engineering and Science, Technology and Society. She is also the Faculty Director of the California State University (CSU
Paper ID #42904Board 296: Immersive Engineering Learning and Workforce Development:Pushing the Boundaries of Knowledge Acquisition in a CAVEDr. Opeyemi Peter Ojajuni, Southern University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Dr. Opeyemi Ojajuni is a post-doctoral research manager at Southern University and A&M College, Baton Rouge, LA, with expertise in computer network infrastructure, artificial intelligence, virtual reality (VR), and data science. His research focuses on applying these technologies to STEM education, particularly improving enrollment, retention, and computational thinking development. He also
traditionally underrepresented.MethodsPreviously, we implemented soft robotics curricula in a variety of K12 contexts [18]–[20]. In this pilotstudy, we (1) delivered a four-day curriculum that focuses on representing engineers from a broad rangeof identities in course materials and (2) piloted an Institutional Review Board (IRB) approvedquantitative survey of subject related identities and demographic data. The goal of this pilot was toevaluate our experimental methods for ease and clarity of implementation.Implementation The goal of this study is to broaden students’ definitions of who can do robotics. To thatend, we revised our introductory curriculum, being mindful of the individuals in the field that wehighlight by giving examples of women and
: Seven Research-Based Principles for Smart Teaching,” San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2010, ISBN: 978- 0-470-48410-4.[6] J. D. Bransford, A. L. Brown, & R. R. Cocking, (Eds). National Research Council. How People Lean: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School: Expanded Edition. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2000. https://doi.org/10.17226/9853.[7] National Research Council. Discipline-Based Education Research: Understanding and Improving Learning in Undergraduate Science and Engineering. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2012. https://doi.org/10.17226/13362.[8] N. Kober, National Research Council. Reaching Students: What Research Says About Effective Instruction in Undergraduate Science
Paper ID #18066Spatial Skills Training Impacts Retention of Engineering Students – DoesThis Success Translate to Community College Students in Technical Educa-tion?Ms. Susan Metz, Stevens Institute of Technology Susan Staffin Metz is the Executive Director of Diversity & Inclusion and Senior Research Associate at Stevens Institute of Technology. She is a long time member of the Stevens community serving as execu- tive director of the Lore-El Center for Women in Engineering and Science and in 1990 launching WEPAN (Women in Engineering Proactive Network), a national organization catalyzing change in the academic climate
particular, activities/tours that were specific toindividual project teams are not listed in this table).Teacher Research ProjectsEight faculty members from the school of engineering volunteered to supervise teacher projectsin the summers of 2016-2018. Each engineering faculty member gave an overview of his/herproject on the second day of the program and gave teachers the opportunity to tour the labfacilities and ask questions before being asked to rank the projects by order of preference on thethird day. Project assignment involved taking the teachers’ preferences in mind, as well as tryingto pair up appropriate skills and backgrounds to each project. Most teachers received their first orsecond choice and were generally pleased with the project
qualitative data during the second cycle of camps in summer 2019. Inaddition, an interesting outcome (theme 2) was that the camps did instill in the campers theconnection of words like “teamwork”, “collaboration” and “communication” to engineering.This has been indicated as a necessity in marketing engineering to the public, including K-12[16]. Finally, an outcome of theme 3 is that we will be giving guidance to the campers on classesthey should be considering to be successful in engineering keeping in mind what has beensuggested in [16]. We will also reinforce the connection of camp activities to fields ofengineering throughout the five days of camp. Future work will focus on understanding whichactivities and approaches serve to positively foster
teachers to develop an understanding of and appreciation for funds of knowledge inrelation to engineering design learning. This research project supports teachers in integratingasset-based practices (particularly funds of knowledge) into their teaching of engineering, andaims to examine how such integration of can impact Latinx students’ and EnglishLearners/Emergent Bilinguals’ interest in, and knowledge of engineering. The project offers anopportunity to have an early impact on students’ engineering interest while also providingteachers with a broader perspective of how to develop students’ engineering habits of mind anddispositions using asset-based practices in ways that are aligned with Next Generation ScienceStandards (NGSS). This paper
, & M. K. Norman, “How Learning Works: Seven Research-Based Principles for Smart Teaching,” San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2010, ISBN: 978-0-470-48410-4.[4] J. D. Bransford, A. L. Brown, & R. R. Cocking, (Eds). National Research Council. 2000. How People Lean: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School: Expanded Edition. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/9853.[5] National Research Council. 2012. Discipline-Based Education Research: Understanding and Improving Learning in Undergraduate Science and Engineering. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13362.[6] N. Kober, National Research Council. 2015. Reaching Students: What Research Says
Paper ID #6969Feedback in Complex, Authentic, Industrially Situated Engineering Projectsusing Episodes as a Discourse Analysis Framework – Year 1Dr. Milo Koretsky, Oregon State University Dr. Milo Koretsky is a professor of Chemical Engineering at Oregon State University. He currently has research activity in areas related to thin film materials processing and engineering education. He is interested in integrating technology into effective educational practices and in promoting the use of higher level cognitive skills in engineering problem solving. Dr. Koretsky is a six-time Intel faculty fellow and has won awards for
Paper ID #8668A Classification Scheme for ”Introduction to Engineering” Courses: DefiningFirst-Year Courses Based on Descriptions, Outcomes and AssessmentDr. Kenneth Reid, Ohio Northern University Ken Reid is the Director of Engineering Education, Director of First-Year Engineering and Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Ohio Northern University. He was the seventh person in the U.S. to receive a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Purdue University. He is active in engineering within K-12, serving on the TSA Boards of Directors and over 10 years on the IEEE-USA Precollege Education Committee. He was awarded
Paper ID #43727Board 187: A Hybrid Community of Practice Model to Prepare Pre-ServiceSTEM Teachers to Teach EngineeringDr. Betsy Chesnutt, University of Tennessee at Knoxville Betsy Chesnutt is a lecturer in Engineering Fundamentals at the University of Tennessee-Knoxville. She is interested in understanding how to prepare pre-service teachers to teach engineering, as well as how to support current K-12 teachers so that they can implement engineering into K-12 classrooms more effectively. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 A Hybrid Community of Practice Model to Prepare Pre
Paper ID #43408Board 403: The Influence of Belongingness and Academic Support duringa Global Pandemic for Engineering Students through Participation in anS-STEM Intervention ProjectProf. George Kow Quainoo, North Park University George K. Quainoo is Professor and Chair of the Department of Physics and Engineering at North Park University in Chicago. He received his B.S and M.S in Physics from the University of Cape Coast in Ghana and his Ph.D in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Saskatchewan in Canada. Prior to joining North Park University, he served at lecturer at the University of Caper Coast and as Professor
Paper ID #43113Board 416: Understanding the Experiences of Graduate Program Directors:The Intersection of Roles, Responsibilities, and Care in Engineering GraduateEducationDr. Alexandra Coso Strong, Florida International University As an assistant professor of engineering education at Florida International University, Dr. Alexandra Coso Strong works and teaches at the intersection of engineering education, faculty development, and complex systems design. Alexandra completed her graduate degrees in Aerospace Engineering from Georgia Tech (PhD) and Systems Engineering from the University of Virginia (UVa).Dr. Adam Kirn
adaptability is if you like adapting at work because they have good something, don’t be shy about it. Tell communication skills and can easily them, because then you’ll get more acquire what they need. stuff and learn more. Open-mindedness Early-career engineer has an easy time Being adaptable is being open to adapting at work because they are open- doing other tasks that contribute to the minded and consider multiple solutions overarching goal of the organization. to a problem. Previous experiences Prior knowledge Early-career engineer has an easy time Having acquired a solid
. Hill, E. Tran, S. Agrawal, E. N. Arroyo, S. Behling, N. Chambwe et al., "Active learning narrows achievement gaps for underrepresented students in undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and math," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 117, no. 12, pp. 6476-6483, 2020. 9. D. A. Kolb, Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. FT press, 2014. 10. L.S. Vygotsky and M. Cole, Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press, 1978. 11. V. Tinto, "Through the eyes of students," Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 254-269, 2017. 12. D. Verdin, A. Godwin, A
Paper ID #12268The Impact of a Neuro-Engineering Research Experience for Undergradu-ates Site on Students’ Attitudes toward and Pursuit of Graduate StudiesDr. John D. Carpinelli, New Jersey Institute of Technology Dr. John D. Carpinelli is a Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the New Jersey Institute of Technology. He has served as coordinator of activities at NJIT for the Gateway Engineering Education Coalition and as a member of the Coalition’s Governing Board. He previously chaired NJIT’s Excellence in Teaching Awards Committee and is Past Chair of the University Master Teacher Committee.Linda Hirsch, New
Paper ID #38058Board 327: Investigating Role Identities of Low-Income EngineeringStudents Prior to Their First Semester of CollegeDr. Ryan Scott Hassler, Pennsylvania State University, Berks Associate Teaching Professor of MathematicsDr. Catherine L. Cohan, Pennsylvania State University Catherine Cohan, Ph.D. has been a research psychologist for over 20 years. Her areas of expertise include engineering education, retention of underrepresented students, measurement, and assessment. She is currently an Assistant Research Professor and coorDawn Pfeifer Pfeifer ReitzJanelle B Larson, Pennsylvania State University
Paper ID #30929A Tale of Two Universities: An Intersectional Approach to ExaminingMicroaggressions Amongst Undergraduate Engineering Students at an HBCUand a PWIMeghan Berger M.A., North Carolina A & T State University Meghan is a PhD student in the Rehabilitation Counseling and Rehabilitation Counselor Education pro- gram at North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University. Her broad research interests include exploring the experiences of marginalized groups and multicultural competency in counseling. In the clinical setting, she focuses on culturally relevant therapeutic interventions with African-American and
, many of the students would have been taught relatively little of theCalculus material covered in Math 231. As students in Math 231 are learning much ofthe material for the first time, they may approach the PLTL groups in a more open-minded fashion, and may be more receptive to the learning tools and additional work thatthey are gaining in the groups. Whereas, if students in Math 116 believe that they alreadyknow much of the material, they may be less interested in devoting effort to incorporatingPLTL group activities into their studies and achieve less benefit from the groups. Asmentioned previously, facilitators in Math 105 PLTL groups have frequently encounteredthis attitude. Engineering freshmen in Math 105 often believe that they fully
Paper ID #8492Analysis of the Impact of Participation in a Summer Bridge Program onMathematics Course Performance by First-Semester Engineering StudentsDr. John R. Reisel, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee Dr. John R. Reisel is an associate professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Wisconsin- Milwaukee (UWM). He serves as associate director of the Center for Alternative Fuels, and co-director of the Energy Conversion Efficiency Lab. In addition to research into engineering education, his research efforts focus on combustion and energy utilization. Dr. Reisel was a 2005 recipient of the UWM Dis- tinguished
://www.cecs.wright.edu/cecs/engmath/.Textbook information28 is available at http://www.wiley.com/college/rattan.Bibliography1. Kerr, A.D., and Pipes, R.B., 1987. “Why We Need Hands-On Engineering Education.” The Journal of Technology Review, Vol. 90, No. 7, p. 38.2. Sarasin, L., 1998, “Learning Style Perspectives: Impact in the Classroom.” Madison, WI: Atwood.3. Gardner, H., 1999. “Intelligence Reframed: Multiple Intelligences for the 21st Century.” New York: Basic Books.4. Joyce, B., and Weil, M., 2000, “Models of Teaching.” Boston: Allyn and Bacon.5. Brandford, J.D., et al., Eds., “How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience and School,” Expanded Edition, National Academy of Sciences, 2000.6. Klingbeil, N., Molitor, S., Randolph, B
engineering student population at some institutions [1].With these issues in mind, the research team is starting to develop an engineering orientation-style seminar for SVSM and nontraditional students. The purpose of this semester-long seminaris to support SVSM and nontraditional students in developing a community and provide bothfaculty and peer mentoring throughout the semester, as well as learning supports for studentsstarting or transitioning into an engineering degree. Supports will likely include math and writinghelp sessions, connections to faculty/industry mentors, career preparation activities, info sessionsfrom the veteran resource office, in addition to other resources identified by students. Thisseminar is being developed using a design
developed for the program support ESP’s goals to: 1) create a diverse andwelcoming STEM climate on the FCC campus through events and media that encourage broaderparticipation, 2) increase participation in engineering among economically disadvantaged studentsthrough targeted outreach and recruitment, 3) increase persistence of engineering students alongdiscipline specific pathways to transfer and graduation from four-year universities through a seriesof structured support interventions, and, 4) establish on-going collaborative transfer supportprocesses between the FCC engineering program and CSU-F.With these goals in mind, ESP’s success is evaluated based on achieving the following objectives: 1. Increase engineering degree and/or certificate
Paper ID #16566Hands-On Made 4 ME: Deploying, Using, Developing and Evaluating Desk-top Computer Numerical Controlled (CNC) Systems in the Engineering Class-roomMr. Farhan Azhar, University of Massachusetts Lowell Graduate Research Assistant- Mechanical Engineering at University of Massachusetts Lowell.Mr. Kristofer Tite, University of Massachusetts, Lowell Undergraduate mechanical engineering student at University of Massachusetts Lowell.Dr. Stephen Johnston, University of Massachusetts, Lowell Stephen P. Johnston is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Plastics Engineering at the UMass Lowell. His research interests
working at the pickle plant—to help support the family and her husband’s wages from working for the railroad and a grocerystore. Even though neither of her parents graduated from college, it was never a doubt in her orher brother’s mind that they would since her parents had insisted as such since they were verysmall.For Julie, the appeal of engineering was that it would provide a good job and an opportunity tohelp other people. Both she and her brother ended up at Mines after an engineer at her father’sworkplace told them that it was the best engineering school. After graduating with a degree inmechanical engineering, she had multiple interviews in varying industries but took a job at anengineering firm that was expanding the public lightrail
they learn fromthe textbook and what they are expected to do in the actual Civil Engineering field.Additionally, those students who were taking the lab course simultaneously found this courseextremely helpful because they had more exposure to the use of the knowledge.A more formal presentation of the qualitative feedback will be included in a subsequent journalpaper. The results from this study also suggest that students who are self-regulated, keep theirgoals in mind, know what they are doing and why they are doing it, feel competent to do whatthey are supposed to do, and do their work as expected will do well in the class. The implicationsof these findings suggest the importance of motivation, self-regulation, and self-efficacy in
completemy case study. Clarity was brought through the help of a faculty member from anthropology,Rebecca, and my mentor from engineering/technology two. For my thesis work, I utilizedinterviews, conducted participant observation, and analyzed some co-teaching documents. Dueto the collaborative nature of this team, people bring different perspectives to discussions in bigand smaller groups. The team comprises people from liberal arts, business, and engineeringtechnology. All these different minds working together allow innovation to arise. Severalresearch team members have taken on mentoring roles, with four actively collaborating with meon my thesis. As I presented my thesis proposal to the diverse committee, comprised ofindividuals from the
Paper ID #42082Board 365: Relating Sociocultural Identities to What Students Perceive asValuable to their Professional and Learning Efficacy When Engaging in VirtualEngineering LabsDr. Kimberly Cook-Chennault, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey Kimberly Cook-Chennault is an Associate Professor in the Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department at Rutgers University. She holds BS and MS degrees in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Michigan and Stanford University respectively; anAhmad Farooq, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024