approaches with technical engineering skills. This requires anenhanced curriculum with a focus on student teamwork, a greater consideration of social context,improved communication with diverse constituents, and reflection on an ethical understanding oftheir decisions and solutions. Effective faculty members need to mirror these values and skills intheir instruction and mentoring. Efforts have begun to reimagine the “engineering canon” whichrequires a shift from positioning engineering as a purely technical endeavor to framing it associo-technical. We are developing a new General Engineering program that incorporates thisperspective [30]. In addition, we are developing modules that emphasize the sociotechnicalnature of engineering for traditional
1 Grit/Work • “Engineers have to have perseverance […] I feel like I have (“I have” or “I Approach perseverance” (Francis) am”) • “I do have a very strong work ethic” (Tranlin) Mindset/ • “Engineering is very much a personality thing” (Kathie) Brain • “It’s just the way my brain works” (Eric) • “I’m pretty good at communicating” (Dominic) Social • “I like to help people” (Elizabeth) • “I enjoy group work and working with people” (Bradley) • “I like when things
first awarded in 2012. This minor in these areas. With a strong liberal arts foundation, the cur- requires 27 credits including chemical engineering, Chemistry 35 riculum provides opportunities for students to develop both engineering, advanced science, and ethics courses. In Other technical (biology, math, phys
fundamental materials course and sporadically during machinedesign. During Autumn 2017, the faculty set out to create a more cohesive materials ‘thread’through the curriculum in order to aid the students in associating the information learned in earlycourses to the latter ones. The specific capstone course outcome this course is laying thefoundation for is to “design systems, components, or processes with realistic constraints such aseconomic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health, safety, manufacturing, andsustainability”. The B ENGR 320 labs were revised to incorporate a second 2-hour materialselection lab to provide students with a more open-ended materials selection module thatencourages the students to research broader attributes of
questionnaires was high, with all students engaging with the tool (N = 321) duringtheir projects and an average weekly student response rate of 92%. These compliance rateswere achieved because the weekly DEFT entries were required coursework assignments inthese classes.The iterative design process consisted of an evaluation of the system each semester, usingmixed methods. Observational data of student and instructor experiences with DEFT werecollected. Interviews and post-class surveys with students and instructors provided datatriangulation. The results of this research guided the development of each iteration of DEFTin time for the subsequent semester. Ethical approval for this research was granted by theHarvard University Committee on the Use of
, 2012. Appendix A - Unit OutlineDay 1: Connect circuitry to neuroscience (Lesson 1, 50 min) ● Engage: Demonstrate gripper hand, let students test it out. ● Explore: On large whiteboards, sketch how the gripper hand works and list similarities and differences between circuits & human bodies. Discuss boards briefly. ● Engage: Show VEST and have students take notes on discussion questions, then discuss constraints and ethics (invasive/noninvasive, end-user input, cost, problems etc) ● Homework 0: Jigsaw one of the four articles about BCI/assistive devicesDay 2: Explore Sensor and Logic Components (Lesson 2, 50 min +) ● Elaborate: Jigsaw and discuss the articles, specifically regarding
Paper ID #23311Engagement in Practice: Tensions and Progressions of a Robotics Service-learning ProgramMr. Matthew Aruch, University of Maryland College Park Matthew Aruch is the Assistant Director of the Science Technology and Society Program and PhD candi- date in International Education Policy at the University of Maryland College Park.Dr. David Tomblin, University of Maryland, College Park David is the director of the Science, Technology and Society program at the University of Maryland, Col- lege Park. He works with STEM majors on the ethical and social dimensions of science and technology. David also does public
bioengineering, service learning, universal design, tissue and protein engineering labs, bioengineering ethics, leadership, and capstone proposal writing and design. She is committed to enhancing diversity and inclusivity in en- gineering, and creating opportunities for undergraduate students to engage in K-12 educational outreach. Dr. Hendricks has over a decade of experience leading educational outreach and summer camp programs at both Duke University and the University of Washington.Dr. Ken Yasuhara, University of Washington Ken Yasuhara is an instructional consultant and assistant director at the Office for the Advancement of Engineering Teaching & Learning (ET&L) at the University of Washington. He completed an
conducts research on the history, epistemology, application, and instruction of qualitative research across disciplines, research ethics, grounded theory, ethnography, grounded ethnography, and mixed methods. He is also involved in several other research tracks including faculty teaching and evaluation strategies, interdisciplinary collaboration, teaching applied anthropology, Kalahari San land and resource rights, re- search to practice links in minority health care, and student and instructor perceptions of the impact of social media on student success. With a broad and diverse background in both education and the social sciences, he strives to bring a holistic and interdisciplinary approach to all aspects of teaching
assessed? Practice data analysis 100% 93.4% Practice effective teamwork 98.4% 80.3% Demonstrate laboratory ethics 98.4% 93.4% Exercise creativity within an 88.5% 62.3% engineering context Become familiar with 78.7% 62.3% appropriate instrumentation Design an experiment 78.7% 62.3% Identify strengths and 77.1% 57.4% weaknesses of theoretical models as descriptors of real- world outcomes Practice professional 67.2% 24.6% communication Practice
prematurely. Of course, it is important topoint out that fortunately students who express interest in engineering have a good understandingabout dependence of engineering on mathematics and science. They also realize that the field ofengineering in academia and professional environment tends to be more rigorous than someother professions and requires high level of ethics and responsibility.Description of methodAfter many years of teaching this course, it has been realized that the purpose of offering anintroductory course in engineering could be threefold: a. To attract good students, especially minorities and females, to the field of engineering. b. To provide useful information about engineering for those who have undeclared majors and are
the School. Pat teaches leadership, ethics, sustainabil- ity, and study abroad courses. She has held a number of leadership roles in the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) including four terms on the ASEE Board as well as serving two times as the Chair of Engineering Technology Council. Pat is a Fellow of ASEE. Her research interests include sustainability and study abroad education.Shawn Patrick Shawn Patrick is the Faculty Development Program and Evaluation Director of the Indiana University (IU) School of Medicine Dean’s Office of Faculty Affairs and Professional Development. Shawn is also an associate faculty in the Department of Technology Leadership & Communication through the Purdue
extensive practical knowledge; c. an ability to conduct standard tests and measurements, and to conduct, analyze, and interpret experiments; d. an ability to function effectively as a member of a technical team; e. an ability to identify, analyze, and solve narrowly defined engineering technology problems; f. an ability to apply written, oral, and graphical communication in both technical and non- technical environments; and an ability to identify and use appropriate technical literature; g. an understanding of the need for and an ability to engage in self-directed continuing professional development; h. an understanding of and a commitment to address professional and ethical responsibilities
a rare opportunity for these students toperform undergraduate research. The research theme for this program is energy: specifically,catalysis, energy storage, and biofuels due to the pronounced expertise in these areas at LSU. Amajor strength of this REU program is the partnership with the LSU Business & TechnologyCenter which provides the REU students with training in technology transfer fundamentals andhow to pitch scientific ideas to non-scientists. In addition to the entrepreneurship training, theprogram offers weekly seminars in ethics, effective presenting, applying to graduate school,industrial safety, and topical seminars related to three main research areas of the programs. Thestudents were assessed individually (weekly reports
a design challenge. Communication Communication is essential to effective collaboration and to understanding the particular wants and needs of a “customer,” and to explaining and justifying the final design solution. Attention to Ethical considerations draw attention to the impacts of engineering on ethical people and the environment. considerationsFor eight months, the Fellows met twice a month with the program manager. Through thesemeetings the program manager was able to build a comfortable rapport with the group allowingthem to have conversations around sensitive subjects such as race and gender in the world ofscience, technology, engineering and math. These meetings also allowed the
Introduction to rail, water, roads, 2 Basic infrastructure functions 23 air, and pipelines Fundamentals Module 3 Systems/network analysis 24 Bridges - life cycle 4 Triple Bottom Line/Sustainability 25 Roadways 5 Social impacts of infrastructure 26 Complete streets 6 Teamwork 27 Parking 7 Ethics I
following student outcomes included in ABETGeneral Criterion 3 for Engineering Technology Programs [8]: (a) An ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering; (b) An ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data; (c) An ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability; (e) An ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems; (f) An understanding of professional and ethical responsibility; (k) An ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for
faculty of the United States Naval Academy, Weapons and Systems Engineering Department in 2001. There, she has taught and developed engineering, design and leadership courses. She has received the Admiral Jay L. Johnson Professorship of Leadership and Ethics in 2015, and has served as Associate Chair, Weapons and Systems Engineering, and Director of Faculty and Staff Programs in the Stockade Center for Ethical Leadership.Ms. Nancy Dickson, Vanderbilt Nancy Dickson is currently the Program Director for the Hubert H. Humphrey Fellowship Program, a Fulbright exchange program for educational leaders from developing countries. Additionally, she trains and endorses high school teachers throughout the state in the area of
involved in that area of research. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Preparation of the Professional Engineer: Outcomes from 20 years of a multidisciplinary and cross-sectoral capstone courseAbstractThe grand challenges outlined by the National Academy of Engineers and addressed by theABET (Accreditation Bureau for Engineering and Technology) learning outcomes reflect thechanging landscape of undergraduate engineering education. Indeed, to be competitive, the nextgeneration of engineering professionals must obtain skills and preparation beyond those in atraditional technical discipline. Accordingly, learners must principally demonstrate the ability to:understand ethics and social
impressed by engineering veteran students, and invitedthem for interviews, internships, and employment.The technical writing and communication course at The Citadel is designed to producefamiliarity and the ability to execute a series of professional documents, using exemplars, peerreview, and successive revisions as strategies for production. Students produce professionaldocuments, demonstrating familiarity with the rhetorical objectives, ethics, and documentconventions. Students are exposed to a variety of technical document types and conventions, e.g.,email; memoranda; RFPs; proposals; progress reports; and procedural writing.Students also gain familiarity with brief reports like white papers, producing their own state-of-the-art technical brief
, Academic Platform, Lombard, IL Dr. Ahmed S. Khan has more than thirty-five years of experience in research, instruction, curricula design and development, program evaluation and accreditation, management and supervision. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Paper ID #23409 Dr. Khan received an MSEE from Michigan Technological University, an MBA from Keller Graduate School of Management, and his Ph.D. from Colorado State University. His research interests are in the areas of Nanotechnology, Fiber Optic Communications, Faculty Development, and Social and Ethical Implications of Technology
from ‘strongly disagree’ to ‘strongly agree’, or from ‘very unimportant’to ‘very important’, depending on the particular wording of the question. Sample items arelisted below in Table 2. Underlined items are scored in reverse as they are negatively worded.Table 2: Representative questionnaire items from the different dimensions Dimensions Sample item Awareness Community groups need our help Ability I can make a difference in my community Connectedness I feel an obligation to contribute to society Base skills How important is ethics for a professional engineer Professional Engineering skills are not useful in making the community a better place ability Analyze I would not change my
better positionour program to be competitive with programs of other institutions. The courses in our 120semester credit hours restructured curriculum are similar to most schools and therefore nocompromises are made toward decrease in program effectiveness.Five general education courses were eliminated from the BS ME program, equivalent to areduction of 12 semester credits. The current requirements for General Education total 30semester credits, 18 of which are in the areas of oral and written communications, ethics, culturaldiversity, and personal/social environments areas. The remaining 12 required credits consist ofmathematics and science courses.2. The following pre-calculus level mathematics courses were eliminated from the
responses to the effectiveness of writing exercises inaccomplishing ABET outcomes f through k.Slightly higher ratings were received for WWE for outcomes f, h and i. Similarly, outcomes g, jand k received slightly higher ratings for EES. Again, these observations are as anticipated giventhe nature of the writing exercises incorporated in each of the courses. Writing intensiveexercises in EES enhanced the communication skills, knowledge of contemporary issues andtechniques and skills required for engineering practice11. The design intensive exercises in WWEhelped students realize the professional and ethical responsibility, awareness of broad educationfor engineering solutions, and the need for life-long learning to stay up to the trends
Safety Teaching Practices Large, private, Practice the ability to identify needs • University certifications in chemical Northeastern (problems) and then design and hygiene and waste management region, R1 conduct engineering experiments, to • Process safety checklist before meet the desired needs within realistic experiments constraints such as economic, • Design of experiments by students, environmental, social, political, including identification of hazards ethical, health and safety, and mitigation methods, using manufacturability, OR sustainability
engineering education and related research by adoptingnew ways of thinking (ASEE, 2014; NAE, 2004; UNESCO, 2012). The Engineering EducationResearch (EER) Colloquies (JEE, 2006) specifically called for “research that will helpcharacterize the nature of engineering knowledge (i.e., its technical, social, and ethical aspects)and ways of engineering thinking that are essential for identifying and solving technicalproblems within dynamic and multidisciplinary environments” (p. 260). The ways of engineeringthinking need to be reconsidered to not only meet changing workforce demands, but also toincrease awareness of the social impacts of engineered solutions, to promote diversity andinclusion in the profession, and to solve chronic issues of student
“ability to design and conduct experiments...” (outcome (b)). The FE questionsI analyzed in the case studies call for analysis but not detailed design (in the sense of usinganalysis to select parameters or components); they certainly do not call for design “...withinrealistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety,manufacturability, and sustainability.” (outcome (c)).The FE is only partially aligned with outcome (e), and then, only if “engineering problems”means “textbook engineering problems.” Real-world engineering problems are typicallyill-posed, have multiple goals, have multiple solution strategies, and are subject tonon-engineering constraints [23]; FE questions do not bear these features
Paper ID #241062018 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and ComputingDiversity Conference: Crystal City, Virginia Apr 29Exploring Inclusive Spaces for LGBTQ Engineering StudentsKristin Boudreau, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Kristin Boudreau is Paris Fletcher Distinguished Professor of Humanities at Worcester Polytechnic In- stitute, where she also serves as Head of the Department of Humanities and Arts. Her training is in nineteenth-century literature, but for the past 9 years she has taught engineering ethics, first-year en- gineering courses, and humanities for engineers. She has also worked with
. Facilitate opportunities for employees to work on projects or issues that are socially relevant Men working in engineering and computing to serve as role models. Emphasize ethical and social issues when teaching engineering and computing. Encourage a supportive environment in the classroom and in the program. Encourage and assist early contact between students and professionals. Emphasize the wide variety of expertise necessary to be successful as an engineer or computing professional. Highlight as early as possible the different facets that make up engineering and computing.Methodology and Educational Learning Strategies:This course came out of a passion by the instructor to enhance leadership
].ABET mandates that students have a “major design experience” [1] as part of the universityengineering curriculum. This experience usually consists of a capstone design course (orcourses). These courses are often used to assess the achievement of student outcomes, and anumber of methodologies and rubrics have been developed for this purpose [19-24]. Within thecontext of design skill assessment, specific traits have been studied, including professionalism[25], ethics [26], teamwork [27] and life-long learning [28].Despite the amount of work devoted to assessing design at certain points of student development,typically in introductory and capstone design courses, relatively little exists to measure thechange (and hopefully improvement) of design