Conference Session

Graduate Education Expectations, Preparation, and Pathways

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Kanembe Shanachilubwa, Pennsylvania State University; Catherine G.P. Berdanier, Pennsylvania State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

to discuss how their commitment to their interests also led them to mentor and serveothers using their knowledge. This pattern commonly employed by the participantsremarkably reflects the three tenants of Stewardship Theory as if it were a template used toconstruct each personal statement. The guidelines provided for the GRFP orient applicants todemonstrate their aptitude for conserving, generating, and transforming knowledge.Stewardship Theory constitutes the implicit framework applicants are led to use in their bid todemonstrate their viability as graduate students.ConservationEach participant demonstrated how they grew to become stewards of their discipline throughtheir learning and studies. They distinguished themselves from their peers

Conference Session

Pre-college Engineering Education Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Nicole Alexandra Batrouny, Tufts University; Kristen B. Wendell, Tufts University; Chelsea Joy Andrews, Tufts University; Tejaswini S. Dalvi, University of Massachusetts, Boston

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education

indicated that they worked more as four students in parallel than as acollaborative group. Their interview responses also diverged in terms of how they explained thefunctionality of their design prototype features. Not only did they suggest different purposes forthe same component, they also differed in what kind of model they understood the designconstruction to be. At one end of the spectrum, some Group B team members explained howlight and sound were actually absorbed or reflected by the particular physical materials theychose for their construction, while others framed the physical materials as “stand-ins” for whatthe design would be composed of at larger scale.Group A’s strongly shared understandings of their design concept were consistent

Conference Session

New ECE Laboratories

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Liang Hong, Tennessee State University

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer

assessed using both direct and indirect measures. Thedirect measure was carried out by the instructor through the evaluation of student work based onthe developed rubrics. The rubrics used in the learning outcome assessment and thecorresponding evaluation results were independent from students’ grades. The indirect measurewas carried out through student surveys that reflect their opinions.Table 2 shows the assessment results with direct measure and displays the percentage of studentswho performed at a satisfactory or exemplary level for each of the outcome indicators. Since themathematical model and the block diagram of the OFDM modulation and demodulation wereintroduced in the class, most students were exemplary in their demonstration of

Conference Session

Best In DEED

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Eric Cuellar, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Benjamin David Lutz, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Dominick Trageser; Ricardo Cruz-Lozano, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Information Foundation. Anyopinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those ofthe authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Engineering Information Foundation. Work CitedAeby, P., Fong, R., Isaac, S., Vukmirovic, M., & Tormey, R. (2019). The impact of gender on engineering students’ group work experiences. The International Journal of Engineering Education, 35(3), 756–765.Apesteguia, J., Azmat, G., & Iriberri, N. (2012). The impact of gender composition on team performance and decision making: Evidence from the field. Management Science, 58(1), 78–93.Atman, C. J., Adams, R. S., Cardella, M. E., Turns, J., Mosborg, S., & Saleem

Conference Session

Mechanical Engineering Technical Session: The Art of Education

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Eleazar Marquez, Rice University; Samuel Garcia Jr., Texas State University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

students will study more, 20% will pass/fail the course, 12% will seek assistance withthe teaching assistant or instructor, 8% will pay more attention, and 4% will stop caring for theclass. These findings are paramount in engineering education as they reveal the emotional effectsand the actions taken by students when grades are not favorable. Low grades can further beassociated with student disengaging from lecture sessions or from the entire course.The open-ended responses reflect that most students will increase their effort to study more whengrades are not as expected, others will simply pass/fail the course. Students additionallyacknowledged that timing (e.g., drop deadlines) impacted their choice to study more or to withdrawfrom a course

Conference Session

Mathematics Division Technical Session 3: Diversity in Mathematics Education

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Lee Singleton, Whatcom Community College; Eric Davishahl, Whatcom Community College; Todd Haskell, Western Washington University

Tagged Divisions

Mathematics

areas that could be analyzed for significant differences between populations.Visualization skills are also important for future engineers and can even be a predictor of successin engineering students. Comparisons of beginning and end of quarter scores on the PurdueSpatial Visualization Test – Rotations (PSVT:R) will also be analyzed for model and non-modelcourses.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) undergrant numbers DUE #1834425 and DUE #1834417. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions orrecommendations expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views ofthe NSF.References[1] J. Medina, Brain Rules: 12 Principles For Surviving And Thriving At Work, Home

Conference Session

First-Year Programs: Metacognition, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation #2

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Melissa Lynn Morris, University of Nevada, Las Vegas; Joseph Dygert, West Virginia University; Robin A.M. Hensel, West Virginia University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

early trends seen in this data hold true for alarger, more diverse population.This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.1644119. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.6.0 References[1] R.W. Lent, S.D. Brown, and G. Hackett, “Toward a Unifying Social Cognitive Theory ofCareer and Academic Interest, Choice, and Performance,” Journal of Vocational Behavior, Vol.45, pp. 79/122, August, 1994.[2] A. Duckworth, C. Peterson,M. Matthews, and D. Kelly, “Grit: Perseverance and Passion forLong-Term Goals,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 92

Conference Session

Student Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Stephen Secules, Florida International University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Student

presume to speak for all, buteach act of adding perspective would help the collective understand the process of graduate schooltogether.Methodologically and analytically, I approach my research and life as an ethnographer, a critical scholar,an educator, and an engineer (Secules & Groen-McCall, 2019). Although there was not a formal in situseries of autoethnographic reflections for these findings, I consider my own lived experience to be asource of embodied knowledge. As such, I do not draw on statistics, literature, or studies about graduatestudents to present these findings, these sources do not provide a sense of agency, voice, or the knowledgethat personal experience brings by graduate students. Rather, I synthesize my own and others

Conference Session

Graduate Education Expectations, Preparation, and Pathways

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Maya Denton, University of Texas at Austin; Nathan Hyungsok Choe, Ohio State University; Maura J. Borrego, University of Texas at Austin; David B. Knight, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

to other STEMdepartments to understand the generalizability of results beyond the discipline and institutionstudied, using this analysis approach as a guide. It is also important to begin to consider howequity considerations factor into graduate funding allocations, meaning what students arereceiving what types of sequential funding and how that impacts persistence and completion forwomen and Students of Color.AcknowledgementsThis research was funded by the National Science Foundation through grants #1535462 and#1535226. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions in this article are the authors’ and do notnecessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. We would like to thank ourcollaborators for their contributions to this

Conference Session

Curricular Advancements in ECE

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Chad Eric Davis P.E., University of Oklahoma; Paul Moses, University of Oklahoma

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer

students that do not contribute adequatelyto the group is the biggest challenge in designing a group-based course curriculum. Aneffective strategy to motivate students to contribute in their group is to implement a peerevaluation system where the students evaluate their group members and themselves.Including a self-evaluation is a critical aspect of the group evaluation because it providesthem an opportunity to reflect on their performance and see where they can improve. Fromyears of experience in analyzing group evaluations, students tend to be honest on self-evaluations and are sometimes even harder on themselves than they are on their groupmembers. The group evaluation system in ECE3873 has the following four categories for the self

Conference Session

Student Motivation, Identity, and Resilience

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Saira Anwar, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Muhsin Menekse, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Ahmed Ashraf Butt, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

students' motivation, goals, and self-efficacy on performance," in Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research, 2016, pp. 211–220.[49] D. Heo, S. Anwar, and M. Menekse, "The relationship between engineering students' achievement goals, reflection behaviors, and learning outcomes," Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 1634–1643, 2018.

Conference Session

2-Year College Division: Transferring and Smoothing Transitions

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Surendra K. Gupta, Rochester Institute of Technology (COE); Franz Allen Foltz, Rochester Institute of Technology; James E Moon, Rochester Institute of Technology (COE); Roy W Melton, Rochester Institute of Technology (COE); Michael E. Kuhl, Rochester Institute of Technology (COE); Maureen S. Valentine, Rochester Institute of Technology (CET); James H. Lee, Rochester Institute of Technology (CET); Rob Garrick, Rochester Institute of Technology (CET); Ren Liu

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Two-Year College

18 8 Figure 16: To what extent do you expect Social Issues to be challenging at our university?Overall, their expectations reflected their earlier experiences with maybe a slightly higheramount of angst being at a bigger, and perceived to be more rigorous school.Conclusions: Overall, our findings were fairly consistent with existing studies. The studentswere for the most part concerned with financial aspects of their education. Most chose going to a2-year school first in order to lower their overall educational costs. They also reported a higherlevel of concern over financial resource issues than most of the other issues addressed by thesurvey.Our findings also supported the idea that proximity to home was important to low

Conference Session

Around the Water Cooler: Ideas and Issues in Civil Engineering Education

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Nicholas Tymvios, Bucknell University; Elif Miskioglu, Bucknell University; Eliana Christou, University of North Carolina, Charlotte; Benjamin B. Wheatley, Bucknell University

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

tenure process began in the US in1915, it has faced both criticism and praise. This paper aims to highlight the variability inperceptions of tenure requirements among assistant professors in civil engineering, architecturalengineering, and construction programs, between universities of different research activityintensities and assess their perceptions of impediments towards obtaining tenure. Associateprofessors in the same programs were also surveyed in order to reflect and report theirperceptions of their requirements, and assess the impediments they faced towards their tenureprocess. The motivation for this research is to surface some of the concerns assistant professorshave regarding the tenure process, and to identify if these concerns are

Conference Session

Student Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Jeong Hin Chin, University of Michigan; Yuan Gao, University of Michigan; Herbert Li, University of Michigan; Magel P. Su, California Institute of Technology; Robin Fowler, University of Michigan

Tagged Divisions

Student

-mediated peer review,” InternationalJournal of Educational Telecommunications, vol. 4, pp. 311-345, 1998.[33] T. Connolly, L. M. Jessup, and J. S. Valacich. “Effects of anonymity and evaluative tone onidea generation in computer-mediated groups,” Management science, vol. 36, pp. 689-703, 1990.[34] K. Maneeratana and A. Sripakagorn, “Use of CATME for teamwork assessment inengineering projects,” ThaiPOD 2009, 2009.[35] R. Fowler, “Talking teams: Increased equity in participation in online compared toface-to-face team discussions,” Computers in Education Journal, vol. 6, pp. 21, 2015..[36] P. L. Hirsch and A. F. McKenna, “Using reflection to promote teamwork understanding inengineering design education,” International Journal of Engineering Education

Conference Session

Alternatives to Traditional Assessment

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Eleazar Marquez, Rice University; Samuel Garcia Jr., Texas State University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Policy Analysis, 31(4), 441-462.[6] Carter, D. F., Ro, H. K., Alcott, B., Lattuca, L. R. Co-Curricular Connections: The Role ofUndergraduate Research Experiences in Promoting Engineering Students’ Communication,Teamwork, and Leadership Skills. Research in Higher Education, v57 n3 p363-393. May 2016.[7] Cassady, J.C., Johnson, R.E. Cognitive Test Anxiety and Academic Performance.Contemporary Educational Psychology. Vol. 27 (2), 270-295. 2002.[8] DeHaan, R. L. (2005). The Impending Revolution in Undergraduate Science Education.Journal of Science Education & Technology, 14(2), 253-269. doi: 10.1007/s10956-005-4425-3.[9] Doel, S. (2009). Fostering Student Reflection During Engineering Internships. Asia-PacificJournal of Cooperative Education, 10

Conference Session

Pre-college Engineering Education Division Technical Session 11

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Sana M. Syed, Saint Louis University; J. Chris Carroll, Saint Louis University; Shannon M. Sipes, Indiana University; Traci Aucoin; Adrienne Enriquez, Oregon GEAR UP; Kelsey Z. Musa, Saint Louis University; Rachel Bultas

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education

format of every module consists of teacher resources and thestudent module. The teacher resources are one page summaries describing what STEM topic andprofession is used in this module, a summary of math concepts that the module covers, aninteractive example that the teachers use to guide students, and the required and optionalresources needed for the module [20]. The student module is the engineering-based mathchallenge to work through, that covers a specific topic from their math curriculum, and a free-response reflection for students to express what they learned about engineering and about STEMthrough the module [20]. Modules highlight different areas of engineering, including but notlimited to civil, aerospace, and biomedical engineering

Conference Session

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM) Best Paper Finalists

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Andrew Forney, Loyola Marymount University; Sunai Kim, Loyola Marymount University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

peers; this begs deeperquestions about the meaning of GPA as an absolute or relative indicator of success, and the policyof departments in adhering to one such definition. Still, from an outcome-oriented perspective,students leaving STEM and excelling in their non-STEM discipline would be expected to have anincrease in GPA, though the challenge is to separate what proportion of that increase is due todifferences in program match and what is due to differences in program rigor.Causal Implications for Policy. Related to the above, the RISE serves as a diagnostic, but notnecessarily a prescriptive tool for changes to improve student success. Departments and collegeswould need to reflect on the true explanation for the observed results, or collect

Conference Session

Computers in Education Division Technical Session 7: Advanced CS courses

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Cynthia C. Fry, Baylor University; Kevin Kulda, Baylor University; Gennie Mansi, Baylor University

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education

inserted comments in the code aboutnew patterns and functions that they discovered. Upon finding suspect segments of code, stu-dents modified the contents of the executable and observed the effects to see if the problem waseliminated. They reverted back to the previous version of the executable if the modificationshad unexpected or undesired results. Finally, students implemented and tested their additional modifications. In the previousstage, students had been deliberate in taking notes and discussing various features to alter.Therefore, they simply explored the different ideas they liked most. In BinaryNinja, once theexecutable was altered, the graphical view would immediately reflect the result of the alterationon the program’s flow. Students

Conference Session

Mechatronics and Robotics II

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Luis Alberto Rodriguez, Milwaukee School of Engineering; Michael D. Cook, Milwaukee School of Engineering; William C Farrow, Milwaukee School of Engineering

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering

, "Developing systems thinking among engineers: Recent study findings," in IEEE Systems Conference (SysCon) Proceedings, Vancouver, BC,, 2015.[9] S. a. F. M. Kordova, "The T Shape dilemma (depth versus width) in education of industrial engineering & management and its reflection in the students team project," Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, 2010.[10] H. H. Cheng, "C for the Course," ASME Mechanical Engineering Magazine, pp. 50-52, September 2009.[11] M. Kamaruzzaman, "5 reasons to learn a new Programming Language in 2020:Learn a new programming language to boost your career and skillset in the new year," 27 Dec. 2019. [Online]. Available: https://towardsdatascience.com/5-reasons-to-learn-a-new- programming

Conference Session

NSF Grantees: S-STEM 1

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Sura Alqudah, Western Washington University ; Elizabeth Litzler, University of Washington; Joseph Arthur Brobst, Old Dominion University; Jill Davishahl, Western Washington University; Andrew G. Klein, Western Washington University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

projects course on student retention,” in Proceedings ASEE Conference and Exhibition, 2003.[19] C. B. Zoltowski and W. C. Oakes, “Learning by doing: Reflections of the epics program.” International Journal for Service Learning in Engineering, vol. 9, 2014.[20] National Academy of Engineering, Educating the engineer of 2020: Adapting engineering education to the new century. National Academies Press, 2005.[21] J. A. Mejia, D. Drake, and A. Wilson-Lopez, “Changes in latino/a adolescents engineering self- efficacy and perceptions of engineering after addressing authentic engineering design challenges,” in Proceedings of American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, 2015, pp. 1–14.[22] C. B. Zoltowski, W. C. Oakes, and

Conference Session

Mechanical Engineering Technical Session: Curriculum and Education

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Randall D. Manteufel, University of Texas at San Antonio; Amir Karimi P.E., University of Texas at San Antonio

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

be careful of actionsthat can be viewed as belittling, humiliating, ridiculing or shaming of students. It appears criticism,humor and raised voices are viewed as unhelpful by some students.Overall, there appears to be an increase in the number of student complaints. Maybe this is areflection of the increasingly litigious nature of society. Instructors need to evaluate periodicallytheir classroom policies to reflect the reality that expectations in 2020 are not the same as that of20 or 40 years ago, when many of today’s instructors were students.References:[1] C. Novoa, A.M. Ortiz, and K.G. Talley, Multi-Disciplinary Summer Orientation Sessions for First-YearStudents in Engineering, Engineering Technology, Physics and Computer Science, Paper

Conference Session

Perspectives and Evaluation of Engineering Design Education

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Sara Willner-Giwerc, Tufts University; Kristen B. Wendell, Tufts University; Chris Buergin Rogers, Tufts University; Ethan E. Danahy, Tufts University; Isabella Stuopis, Tufts University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

less constrained problem doesn’t always yield a higher solutiondiversity, and how in some cases, the structure of the course itself can be used to motivatestudents’ independent thinking in a design-based project. In future work we hope to analyzeways that the different pedagogical models influenced learning outcomes beyond solutiondiversity such as group dynamics.AcknowledgmentsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation grant numberA451001 SF9018. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed inthis material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation. We would also like to thank the students, teaching assistants, professors,and

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Patricia R Backer, San Jose State University; Cindy Kato, San Jose State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Minorities in Engineering

from the undergraduate demographics inengineering. There were 18 Asian students, 4 Hispanic students, 8 White students and 5 Otherswho responded. Interestingly, there was a high number of first-generation engineering studentswho responded. 34% engineering students (12 students) indicated that they were first-generationstudents.A small number of the engineering students scheduled to graduate in four years changed theirmajor (4 students). This is not surprising considering that students often extend their time tograduation when they switch majors. Of the four students switching their majors, only twoswitched out of the College of Engineering.The first questions asked the students to reflect on their freshmen experiences in blockedscheduling. 51

Conference Session

Chemical Engineering in the Sophomore Year

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Uchenna Asogwa, The University of Toledo; Matthew W Liberatore, The University of Toledo; Timothy Ryan Duckett, The University of Toledo; Gale A Mentzer, Acumen Research and Evaluation, LLC

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

National Science Foundation under Grant No.DUE 1712186. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation. This work was completed within the framework of University of Toledo protocol202214.References1. Crimson. Top 10 Jobs in 2030: Skills You Need Now to Land the Jobs of the Future: Future Skills. 2018 [cited 2019 January]; Available from: https://www.crimsoneducation.org/us/blog/jobs-of-the-future.2. Vest, C.M., Infusing Real World Experiences into Engineering Education. 2012.3. Daigger, G.T., et al., Real World Engineering Education Committee. 2012.4

Conference Session

Pre-college Engineering Education Division Technical Session 19

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Laurel Johnston, Boise State University; Noah Salzman, Boise State University

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education

“simulation” as part of the modeling process after completingthis activity indicates the importance of varying student experiences with modeling. Studentscomplete many activities where they model equations visually, and this was reflected in theirpre-survey results. After experiencing the simulation, many students indicated this as an explicitpart of the modeling process, even though it is not necessarily required. Exposure to a widervariety of modeling tasks that include simulation may broaden student definitions.Future Work One purpose of this simulation was for students to engage in the mathematical modelingprocess by using the simulation to test the velocity equations that they derived. However, somegroups looked at the structure of the pre

Conference Session

Faculty and Student Perspective on Instructional Strategies

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Monica Quezada-Espinoza, Universidad Andres Bello, Chile; Angeles Dominguez, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Mexico, and Universidad Andres Bello, Chile; Genaro Zavala, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Mexico, and Universidad Andres Bello, Chile; Juan Felipe Calderón, Universidad Andres Bello, Chile

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

outcomes and the development of "hard" and "soft"competencies related to their professional profiles [8, 9], teamwork vs. lecture-basedstrategies [10], and problem-based approaches [11].It is not a new issue that the type of teaching is something that it is notably important. It hasbeen shown that the use of student-centered learning strategies promotes learning and thedevelopment of various skills, such as teamwork, critical thinking, and reflection, amongothers. Considering this, the School of Engineering of the Universidad Andres Bello in Chile,where this research took place, has been investing effort into reforming how faculty membersteach classes and promoting active learning strategies. To trigger the needed transformation,the Educational

Conference Session

ENT Division Technical Session: First-year Experiences

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Elizabeth Pluskwik, Minnesota State University, Mankato; Yuezhou Wang, Minnesota State University, Mankato

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation, First-Year Programs

forimprovement. Similar to typical engineering classes, the instructor tends to assess the activity byquizzing the technical content but often ignores the instant feedback about the activity itself aswell as the emotional aspects, i.e. “Do you enjoy this activity?” We solicit information fromstudents about improvement of teaching towards the end of semester, but this would seldom focuson one particular activity and thus not add on much value. We recognize the importance of timelyfeedback after the activity. If a student notices his/her input is valued and taken into redesign theactivity, the feeling of ownership [22] may enhance the engagement.Student response to active learning is reflected in the question set 2[1] summarized in Table 4.Overall

Collection

2019 ASEE Zone I Conference & Workshop

Authors

Christian E Lopez; Conrad S Tucker

serving as a practical, low-cost StudentResponse System for educators.Acknowledgment This research is funded by the National Science Foundation NSF NRI #1527148 and NSFDUE #1525367. Any opinions, findings, or conclusions found in this paper are those of theauthors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the sponsors.References1. Nacke LE, Deterding S. The maturing of gamification research. Comput Human Behav. 2017;71:450-454. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.062.2. Baptista G, Oliveira T. Gamification and serious games: A literature meta-analysis and integrative model. Comput Human Behav. 2019;92(1):306-315. doi:10.1021/ja01313a503.3. Rapp A, Hopfgartner F, Hamari J, Linehan C, Cena F. Strengthening gamification studies

Collection

2019 ASEE Zone I Conference & Workshop

Authors

A. Richard Vannozzi; Leonard Anderson

reflection it seemed thatreinforcing the oral explanation with a brief written synopsis might aid in student understandingand improving the statement agreement scores for Statements 1, 4, 5, 6 & 8.The third recommendation relates to how team members collaborated (or didn’t) on this groupresponsibility. It was observed that some teams shared the work evenly, while in others oneindividual took care of the entire set of guest lecturer responsibilities. To provide someaccountability and as a reminder to the teams that this aspect of their capstone experience isgoverned by the same rules relative to team work and shared responsibility as their design workand presentations, a few sentences articulating some basic expectations for task distribution

Conference Session

Computer Engineering Technology Curriculum

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Veeramuthu Rajaravivarma, Central Connecticut State University; G. Thomas Bellarmine, Florida A&M-Florida State University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

the password to be authenticated to connect to the VNC server, as shown in Figure 6. Enter the VNC server’s password and click OK. Now, the display window of server machine is shown in Figure 7. 6. Now, once connected, the server machine can be accessed. All mouse clicks and keyboard presses on this window will be reflected on the server machine. You are now free to interact with your server machine.VNC servers and viewers for other operating systems may be installed and run in asimilar fashion. Page 12.1593.13 Proceedings of the 2007 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference