) “Effect of think-pair-share in a large CS1 class: 83% sustained engagement,” In Proceedings of the ninth annual international ACM conference on International computing education research (ICER '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2013, pp. 137-144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2493394.249340823. Nagappan, N.; Williams, L.; Ferzli, M.; Wiebe, E.; Yang, K.; Miller, C.; and Balik, S. (2003) “Improving the CS1 experience with pair programming,” In Proceedings of the 34th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education (SIGCSE '03). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2003, pp. 359-362. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/611892.61200624. Porter, L.; Bouvier, D.; Cutts, Q.; Grissom, S.; Lee, C.; McCartney, R.; Zingaro, D.; and Simon
. Manag. Rev., vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 295– 308, 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.hrmr.2009.09.002.[3] J. Mathieu, M. T. Maynard, T. Rapp, and L. Gilson, “Team Effectiveness 1997-2007: A Review of Recent Advancements and a Glimpse Into the Future,” J. Manag., vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 410–476, Jun. 2008, doi: 10.1177/0149206308316061.[4] I. Aggarwal and A. W. Woolley, “Team Creativity, Cognition, and Cognitive Style Diversity,” Manag. Sci., vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 1586–1599, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.1287/mnsc.2017.3001.[5] A. Edmondson, “Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams,” Adm. Sci. Q., vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 350–383, Jun. 1999, doi: 10.2307/2666999.[6] L. Meadows et al., “Interactive Panel: Improving the Experiences of Marginalized
Proceedings, 2018, doi: 10.18260/1-2--30204.[56] J. A. Mejia, D. Ruiz, V. Popov, A. Esquinca, and D. Gadbois, “Board 104: Asset-based Practices in Engineering Design (APRENDE): Development of a Funds-of-Knowledge Approach for the Formation of Engineers,” in Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019.[57] S. L. Dika, M. A. Pando, B. Q. Tempest, and M. E. Allen, “Examining the Cultural Wealth of Underrepresented Minority Engineering Persisters,” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., vol. 144, no. 2, pp. 1–9, Apr. 2018, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000358.[58] S. L. Dika, M. A. Pando, B. Q. Tempest, K. A. Foxx, and M. E. Allen, “Engineering self- efficacy, interactions with faculty
." United Nations Organization. https://unsdg.un.org/resources/policy-brief-education-during-covid-19-and-beyond (accessed April 14, 2021).[3] S. Khan, R. Rabbani, I. Thalassinos, and M. Atif, "Corona Virus Pandemic Paving Ways to Next Generation of Learning and Teaching: Futuristic Cloud Based Educational Model," Available at SSRN 3669832, 2020.[4] J. Q. Michael Fullan, Max Drummy, Mag Gardner, "Education Reimagined: The Future of Learning," no. http://aka.ms/hybridlearningpaper. [Online]. Available: http://aka.ms/hybridlearningpaper[5] "Pandemic sparks game-changing approach to hardware training." https://www.cmc.ca/pandemic-sparks-game-changing-approach-to-hardware-training/ (accessed April 14, 2021).[6] Q. N. Naveed, M
MathCAD MathCAD MathCAD SW Sim SW Sim SW Sim Ethics #1 Morales Sketch PLCObjectives Q#1 Q#2 HW#3 mini #1 quiz Takata Report Total 50 75 75 50 25 25 100 100 10 10 10 10 5 20 10 25 20 50 Avg 42.4 63.6 62.7 42.3 20.9 21.7
professional responsibilities in engineering situations and makeinformed judgments considering the impact of engineering solutions in global, economic,environmental, and societal contexts. All other all-section average scores were above 3.0. That is, Table 4. Summary of Survey Results on Student Outcomes Section 1 Section 2 Section 3 All Sections Q# Av. Std. Dev Av. Std. Dev Av. Std. Dev Av. Std. Dev Q1-a 2.77 1.20 2.82 1.10 3.11 0.94 2.89 1.10 Q1-b 2.64 1.26 2.88 0.96 3.11 0.87 2.86 1.08 Q2-a 2.91
. Su and P. C. Lee, “Mapping knowledge structure by keyword co-occurrence: a first look at journal papers in technology foresight,” Scientometrics, vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 65–79, 2010. [5] V. Rodrigues, “How to write an effective title and abstract and choose appropriate keywords,” Editage Insights (04-11-2013), 2013. [6] Y. HaCohen-Kerner, “Automatic extraction of keywords from abstracts,” in International Conference on Knowledge-Based and Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems. Springer, 2003, pp. 843–849. [7] Y. B. Wu, Q. Li, R. S. Bot, and X. Chen, “Domain-specific keyphrase extraction,” in Proceedings of the 14th ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management, 2005, pp. 283–284. [8] K
home’s volume to surface area ratio, which reduces the total amount ofheat transfer through the walls. The homes in Figures 3(m), (n), and especially (q) and (r) werebuilt into the ground to make an Earthen home. This also increases the efficiency of the home byadding insulation to the home’s walls and reducing the rate of heat transfer through the walls.The home in Figure 3(m) and (n) also featured a large rainwater collection system. The homes inFigures 3(a), (b), (g), (h), (i), (j), (k), (l), (m), (n), (s), and (t) all incorporated a PV system.Considering that solar photovoltaics is a major portion of the course, and students gainsignificant lab experience working with PV system components, it is not surprising that moststudents incorporate
academicallymature individuals with work experiences outside of college. This information would be valuablefor identifying the precise needs of SCS undergraduate students and targets for intervention andprogrammatic efforts to facilitate their academic and career goals and support their well-being. Specifically, we examined the following research questions:Q.1 How do SCS undergraduate students differ from traditional undergraduate students andgraduate students in terms of needs based on their levels of school and personal demands andresources?Q.2 How do SCS undergraduate students differ from traditional undergraduate students andgraduate students in their levels of student outcomes?MethodProcedure In April of 2019, a link to a 57-question
, pp. 137-144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2493394.249340823. Nagappan, N.; Williams, L.; Ferzli, M.; Wiebe, E.; Yang, K.; Miller, C.; and Balik, S. (2003) “Improving the CS1 experience with pair programming,” In Proceedings of the 34th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education (SIGCSE '03). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2003, pp. 359-362. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/611892.61200624. Porter, L.; Bouvier, D.; Cutts, Q.; Grissom, S.; Lee, C.; McCartney, R.; Zingaro, D.; and Simon, B. (2016) “A multi-institutional study of peer instruction in introductory computing,” In Proceedings of the 47th ACM Technical Symposium on Computing Science Education (SIGCSE '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2016, pp
-engagement-visible/.[16] Eberly Center for Teaching Excellence: Intercultural Communication Center, “Recognizing and Addressing Cultural Variations in the Classroom,” 2006.[17] Q. Zhu, “Toward a Globalized Engineering Education: Comparing Dominant Images of Engineering Education in the United States and China,” Am. Soc. Eng. Educ. Annu. Conf. Expo., 2019.[18] W. Sun and Q. Zhang, “How to Build an American Classroom Environment in a Chinese Engineering College,” Am. Soc. Eng. Educ. Annu. Conf. Expo., 2015.[19] G. J. Ryan, L. L. Marshall, K. Porter, and H. Jia, “Peer, professor and self-evaluation of class participation,” Act. Learn. High. Educ., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 49–61, 2007.Appendix – Final Version of the Participation Log
students) and we iterating the May 1st deadline for accepting or declining offers. A significant portion of the Family Session was allocated for Q & A – families were able to ask staff as well as 3‐4 current engineering students questions. We found that they had lots of questions for the current students ranging across different areas. Concurrently in the alternate location, admitted students were given the same opportunity to learn about the student support services while asking questions of staff and current 4students. A portion of that time was dedicated to a hands‐on activity: designing & building a paper tower. Students were only allowed
definitely think that I could have made my presentation moreinteractive and engaging. I think for next time, I will try to incorporate several different activitiesinto the lesson instead of just one at the end.” Similarly, “I think I could have had more specificinstructions” or “I could also improve by providing relatable examples so that the audience canbetter understand the topic” indicated that students recognized that they needed to go more in-depth or explain their key concepts better (18%).Many made mention that discussion and Q&A sessions were successful as assessments (17%), “Ifeel that I had a well thought out topic that connected well back to content of this class. Thepresentation that I prepared was engaging and easy to follow, with
diffusivity can be calculated. Furthermore, the thin- The rate of heat transfer utilized to evaporate moisture from layer drying model[8] proposes an equation in terms of dryingthe apple slices surface, during the constant drying rate period, parameters to characterize the changes of mean moisture con-is calculated by the following equation[8]: tent of food products during drying. These parameters account Q e = 0.016h c {P ( Ts ) − γP ( Te )} (5) for the combined effect of various transport phenomena in the drying process and are shown in the following equation:where
were created using the combined approaches of a review ofrelevant literature and instruments, a Q-Study, and expert panel. Items were adapted fromidentified existing and relevant instruments, administered to a development sample, andevaluated and optimized for scale length (see 35, 37 and 38 for full descriptions of thedevelopment process). Once initial items were generated, think-aloud sessions were conductedwith undergraduate students to determine face validity [38]. During the second phase ofinstrument development, a pilot testing of the survey was conducted with data collected from133 participants. An Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) was used to reduce the number andrefine the content of items as well as establish a preliminary structure
Coordinate travel, housing & other amenities. Check-in formalities. Arrive @ TAMU.@ TAMU Pre-program survey (championed by external evaluator). # Debrief. Campus tour. (WEEK) RESEARCH PROJECT EXPERIENCE (VIP TEAMS) PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT (COE USRG)* May Define project objectives, methodology, Welcome breakfast. Orientation. General lab (Week-1) schedule & outcomes. Specific lab(s) safety. safety training. Welcome Bar-B-Q. Ethics. Jun. Research plan due! Overview of metrology/ GRE workshop: What to expect. Seminar: (Week-2) NDI principles, techniques, labs & literature. TAMU early admissions program. Jun. Tackle/plan-for research questions & tasks. GRE workshop: Maximize
the basis of likelihood, the final desired number of visuallysignificant scenes is determined dynamically via a user setting. The user has the ability to set thegranularity, which at one extreme selects only the most significant changes, and at the otherextreme shows all significant changes, including the least significant ones. Page 12.985.8Figures 5-7: Camera shots when presentation slides are not present: (top left) Prototypedemonstration, (top right) Q&A from students, (bottom left) Q&A from audience member.Key frames are an invaluable visual tool for an alternative to viewing the entire video or usingthe positioning peg to skim a
where thestudents are required to take 13 hours of nuclear and radiation engineering courses with theMechanical Engineering Department. There is an excellent opportunity for recruiting thesestudents as well. Below is a detailed description of the above mentioned courses. 1. Introduction to Nuclear Power Systems This course is an introduction to the concepts of nuclear engineering and is the firstcourse to be taken in the sequence. The course starts with an introduction to nuclear structure andnuclear decay. The structure of the atom is discussed along with binding energy, radioactivedecay and the calculation of Q values. Basic nuclear reaction calculations are covered nextincluding reaction rates and calculations of the neutron
compensate for hysteresisbehavior19, 23, 24. % Step 1: Load in the measurement data; a=load(’wholespectrum’); wholespectrum=a.wholespectrum ; output1=wholespectrum.Y(1).Data; input1=wholespectrum.Y(2).Data; % Step 2. Use the MATLABsystem identification % toolbox to obtain the frequency response data; zsw1 = iddata ( output1’, input1’, 0.0001 ); zswd1 = detrend ( zsw1 ); %specify the frequency range f_range = ( 1 : 600 ) . * 2 * pi; zf_sw1 = spafdr ( zswd1, [], f_range ); rd ( : , : ) = zf_sw1 ( 1 , 1 , : ).ResponseData; fre q = zf_sw1 ( 1 , 1 , : ).Frequency; New_rd
undergraduate engineering success for underrepresented minority students. Journal of Engineering Education, 92(1), 27-27-39.36. McCoy, L. P., & Heafner, T. L. (2004). Effect of gender on computer use and attitudes of college seniors. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 10(1), 55-55-66.37. McLoughlin, L. A. (2005). Spotlighting: Emergent gender bias in undergraduate engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(4), 373-373-381.38. Meyer, Diana. (2002). Wulf: Leading the NAE as it helps shape national policy. http://72.14.209.104/search?q=cache:aYFXqc2VAe4J:https://www.ece.uiuc.edu:4443/alumni/su02/wulf.html+ Dr.+William+A.+Wulf+%22engineering+is+a+creative+profession+that+thrives
e M a t h c a d Q u a d E q S w i m m e r P r o b l e m T i m
F re q u e n c y - H z P has e R es pons e 0 Angle of Av = Vo/Vi in Radians -0 . 5 -1 -1 . 5 0 1 2 3 10 10 10 10 F re q u e n c y - H z Figure 6. Amplitude and Phase Responses of a Low-Pass FilterExample 3. A
explore laminar, transitional and fully turbulentconditions.To determine the volumetric flow rate through the pipe test section, water flowing out ofthe pipe was caught in a measuring cup, and the time required to fill 500 mL measuredwith a stopwatch. The pressure drop along the pipe was determined using the fourmanometers integrated with the pipe and positioned 3.0 inches apart. The uncertainty involumetric flow measurements that ranged between Q = +/- 1 ml/s at low flow rates (10ml/s) to Q = +/- 2 ml/s at high flow rates (30 ml/s). The uncertainty in the pressuremeasurements using the integrated manometers was +/- 2 mm H2O or +/- 20 Pa.The pipe flow/head loss experiment shown in Fig. 3 was characterized by measuring thepressure drop along the
. (2015). Developing the Postsecondary Student Engagement Survey (PosSES) to Measure Undergraduate Engineering Students’ Out of Class Involvement. Paper presented at the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Seattle, WA.14. Simmons, D. R., & Yu, R. (2015). Conducting a Q Study to Refine and Develop New Measures of Engineering Student Co-Curricular Involvement. Paper presented at the Research in Engineering Education Symposium 2015, Dublin, Ireland.15. Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research: Sage.16. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches: Sage publications.17. Patton, M. Q. (1987). How to use qualitative methods in evaluation: Sage.18
. Q&A and leading group per class period · 100% reported communicating discussions) · 97% indicated that the most common weekly with UGTFs (but one · 75% of the UGTFs reported meeting interaction with UGTFs was Q&A; responded that they did not with their faculty at least 1x/week, 60% indicated that UGTFs also personally meet a weekly basis) but 1 UGTF reported not asked questions; 30% noted that the · 75% reported that UGTFs increased communicating outside of class at all UGTFs facilitated group discussions the level of in-class student group with
.[13] J. Cha and Y. He, Zhongguo gongcheng jiaoyu gaige san da zhanlue (Three Straetgies in Chinese Engineering Education Reform), Beijing: Beijing Institute of Technology Press, 2009.[14] Q. Gu, "The work, lives and professional development of teachers in China," Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 235-238, 2013.[15] Y. Wei, "Yingjie jiaoyu yanjiu de xin fanshi: Shenjing jiaoyuxue [Embracing a new paradigm for educational research: Neuroeducation]," 19 December 2012. [Online]. Available: http://www.cae.cn/cae/html/main/col35/2012-12/27/20121227152437045647584_1.html. [Accessed 4 February 2019].[16] D. Starr, "China and the Confucian education model," Universitas, vol. 21, pp. 1-27, 2012.[17] R. L
Research in 2006,” Des. Res. Q., Sep. 2006.[2] E. Sanders, “An Evolving Map of Design Practice and Design Research,” Interactions, pp. 13–17, Dec. 2008.[3] IDEO, The Field Guide to Human-Centered Design. 2015.[4] C. B. Zoltowski, W. C. Oakes, and M. E. Cardella, “Students’ ways of experiencing human-centered design,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 28–59, 2012.[5] I. Mohedas, S. Daly, and K. Sienko, “Design Ethnography in Capstone Design: Investigating Student Use and Perceptions,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 888–900, 2014.[6] R. P. Loweth, S. R. Daly, J. Liu, and K. H. Sienko, “Assessing Needs in a Cross-Cultural Design Project: Student Perspectives and Challenges,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 36, no. 2, pp
Presentation and Design Office room Week 6 Q&A (1) 15 Friday “40% Design” Submitted electronically Week 6 Report Friday Preliminary Report 5 Submitted electronically Week 10 Thursday Submitted electronically Final Report 60(2) Week 12 -AND- Hardcopy delivered Friday
engineers. In D. K. Deardorff (Ed.), The SAGE Handbook of Intercultural Competence (pp. 362-373). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.[25] Davis, M. (2006). Integrating ethics into technical courses: Micro-insertion. Science and Engineering Ethics, 12(4): 717-730.[26] Richards, L. G., Gormon, M., Scherer, W. T., & Landel, R. D. (1995). Promoting active learning with cases and instructional modules. Journal of Engineering Education, 84(4): 375-381.[27] Jesiek, B. K., Zhu, Q., Woo, S. E., Thompson, J., & Mazzurco, A. (2014). Global engineering competency in context: Situations and behaviors. Online Journal of Global Engineering Education, 8(1).[28] Jesiek, B. K., Woo, S. E., Zhu, Q., Ramane, K. D., & Choudhary, N. (2015