for them. Even if they don’t get feedback from employers, there are peer advisors, faculty, staff, and alumni who are happy to work with them to provide input and support throughout their search.Theme 2: Finding the Right OptionsMany students reported that they chose Mechanical Engineering because of the breadth ofopportunities that it presented, then struggled to identify the opportunities that would be mostrelevant or most interesting to them. That issue was compounded by both the hidden job market(i.e.: small companies often don’t post and promote positions in the same way large companiesdo) and the lack of specificity in job postings, with second and third-year engineering studentsoften not having the base of knowledge yet to
, with stratification by gender to ensure diversity. In total, 14 studentsparticipated in the interviews, comprising 5 seniors, 5 juniors, and 4 sophomores. The absence offirst-year students notwithstanding, the selected participants offered a broad perspective acrossthe different stages of the chemical engineering undergraduate program.Data CollectionData collection for this study was conducted through comprehensive interviews with allparticipating students. These hour-long interviews were carried out by fellow undergraduatestudents who had not only completed human subject research training but were also directlyinvolved in this research project. The choice of peer interviewers was strategic, aiming to createa relaxed and relatable atmosphere
research projects, working towardssignificant findings, and delivering oral and written presentations of the results [19].On the other hand, research conducted within a laboratory is typically confined to hands-onexperiments and the subsequent writing of lab reports. The scholars pressed that this distinctionis crucial to avoid conflating the broader research experience with the specific activities carriedout in a research laboratory setting [19]. Such insights underscore the importance of recognizingthat research experiences can encompass various activities beyond traditional lab work,contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of the research landscape thatundergraduates navigate.MethodsThe approach used in this study employed
and insights for the participants to consider whenworking with their students. Each session also included hands-on curriculum design time dedicatedto writing specific components of the curriculum modules. The workshops culminated with asharing session during which teachers could provide one another with feedback and suggestions.At the end of the summer program, the curriculum modules were submitted to the curriculumdevelopment expert assigned to this RET project for review. The expert reviewed the modules toensure that they aligned with program goals and state/national standards, reflected best practices,and utilized active, problem-based learning strategies to foster learner interest, engagement, andachievement. Lastly, continuous
three sections that: (1) asks students to write apaper on a treatment plan including an orthopedic implant for a provided patient profile, (2) createa presentation presenting this plan to the stakeholders, and (3) determine the biomechanicalproperties that the implant and any selected materials need to satisfy. Using a pre- and post-projectsurvey from two cohorts of students, we determined the effectiveness of the assignment andgauged the extent to which students believed that their demographics influenced their motivation.Demographic-based influences are defined here as whether students believe that they are moremotivated to be successful in their major based on their race, gender, community, etc. Our datademonstrate that EML scores, which is
student retention. To helpensure sustainability, we also introduced a community of practice with faculty teachingintroductory programming courses across the six California State Universities. We organized ouralliance using a collective impact model allowing for the flexibility of learning from our peers asfaculty colleagues, while developing customized curriculum with the same goal – servingmarginalized students better.This work is influenced by research documenting that early computer science courses can bechallenging for all students [2, 3]. And, while there are nationwide efforts to tackle the creation ofentry ways into computing that are welcoming for all students (CS4All), specific intention andfocus on the experience of historically
value of tinkering, upcycling, and fixing objects using the resources in their surroundings. She graduated top of her class in a school with a predominantly Latine population. The story is different in college where she is often the only Latine student in her classes. There, she hides the competencies learned in her community as they do not look as cutting edge as the robotics and design examples in the models of engineering portfolios. Her ideas are powerful yet frequently misunderstood by her peers, most of whom grew up in affluent communities. During her last engineering design project, her team dismissed her ideas about how to design a low- cost but durable automatic seed plotter – despite her
. Onestudent stated that, “using ChatGPT to smooth over your writing is definitely a positive”especially for students for whom “English is not their first language” (P57 White man domesticstudent). Similarly, another student used AI to translate “niche technical terms” from lecturesinto more easily understood descriptions (P55 Black woman domestic student). There wasgeneral appreciation for AI technologies and a sense that “AI is not going to replace humans. AIis just going to become a tool that humans are gonna coexist with” (P42 Asian man domesticstudent). This student described unique opportunities for “collaboration” between humans andAI. When sharing about a situation in which a professional board game player watched AlphaGo,a computer programmed
Education Forum (WEEF) – Cartagena, Colombia) 2013 UMET-Puerto Workshop: Writing for Dr. Kevin Omland, Dr. Rico Publication Renetta Tull, Nandadevi Cortes (UMBC) 2014 UMBC Panel: Global Pathways to Representatives from The Careers Fulbright Program, the U.S. Department of State, and Instituto Tecnológico y de
,only the first-year students exhibited a positive (though non-significant) trend in CD. Thiscontrast may reflect developmental differences between student cohorts. First-year studentsare typically in a period of social and academic transition, during which they are more likelyto engage with new perspectives and unfamiliar peers. In contrast, third-year students mayhave already formed more stable social networks and academic identities, potentially limitingtheir openness to intercultural engagement. These findings suggest that interventions aimed atenhancing global competence may need to be tailored to students’ developmental stages.3.2.Results of STEM COIL modules (one purely STEM COIL and one STEM COIL with supplementary history components
1g also address DEI within Society, namely, “treatall persons with respect, dignity, and fairness, and reject all forms of discrimination andharassment” (Provision 1f) and “acknowledge the diverse historical, social, and cultural needs ofthe community, and incorporate these considerations in their work” (Provision 1g).The Natural and Built Environment, Profession, and Peers are identified as stakeholder groups 2,3, and 5, respectively. Equity appears in a number of places. Provision 2c of the ASCE Code ofEthics requires engineers “to mitigate adverse societal, environmental, and economic effects,” 3erequires engineers to “promote mentorship and knowledge-sharing equitably with current andfuture engineers,” 5d requires engineers to “promote
their own experiences and needs while neglecting the lived realitiesof marginalized communities. Additionally, these leaders shape privacy and accessibility policiesto serve corporate interests—protecting profits and consolidating power—at the expense ofusers. This is becoming exacerbated as these CEOs and tech leaders are gaining power ingovernment and access to large data sets. Still, there are some ways that their power is beingdestabilized. A recent example (as of the writing of this paper) of this is DeepSeek, anopen-source model that was developed in China and cost far less to create than other AIplatforms, including OpenAI [21].This disconnect between the people who use technology and those who create it has significantimplications for
tool for VW experiences,especially among younger audiences. With millions of active users under age 13, Robloxprovides an engaging and immersive environment where children can explore virtual worlds,create games, and socialize with peers [2]. This platform has attracted significant attention fromboth educators and researchers for its potential as a learning tool. Studies have shown thatRoblox fosters creativity and collaboration, allowing children to experiment with gamedevelopment, storytelling, and design. Its user-friendly interface and wide range of gamesappeal to children, while its open-world nature allows for exploration and interaction within asafe, controlled environment. However, despite its entertainment value, concerns have
, andspaced learning. Additionally, textbook pre-reading assignments and group peer discussionvideos were also available as extra credit throughout the entire course. Feedback was given tostudents for the first two active recall, concept mapping, and weekly schedule assignments, andthe rest was graded for completion. Students were also given a weekly learning journal, whichprompts students to reflect on their learning for the last week, the utility values of the learningstrategies they used for the prior week, and monitor their learning progress as well as makenecessary adjustments. The learning journal assignments (through Google Form) weremandatory up to week 5, and became extra credit assignments later in the quarter, as feedbackwas received from
communication skills through practice. 4- Innovative engineers also encourage one another through peer instruction, professional associations, and group work. 5- Finally, the education of innovative engineers involves sympathetic mentors who provide resources, inspiration, and awareness of the contribution of previous generations.The Framework aims to provide explicit instruction to help students acquire the skills in this list,including skills not explicitly taught in the traditional engineering classroom. Consistent with the valuesof the Framework, students need practice to develop the self-direct learning skills of reading andnotetaking. While pedagogical research has shown some benefit to video resources for class preparation[13], [14
virtualplatforms disrupted these critical elements, significantly impacting both academic progress andpractical training. The shift to online learning, unplanned due to the pandemic, created widespreadchallenges for faculty, staff, and students to adapt to the "new normal." Additionally, research by(Moran et al., 2023; Paul et al., 2023) highlighted equity and access issues in virtual settings,emphasizing the urgent need to address these concerns amidst such abrupt changes. The mentalhealth impacts of the pandemic on graduate students have been significant. Isolation from peers andmentors, coupled with uncertainties surrounding academic progress and job prospects, increasedstress, anxiety, and other mental health issues (Zaniyah et al., 2021).Before the
, student autonomy, and broader social structures to supporttransformative learning experiences [30].Cavagnetto et al. explored how to foster agency in science education through "authorship," wherestudents actively participated in generating knowledge. The study highlighted that agency depended onbalancing the benefits (e.g., engagement, learning) with the costs (e.g., effort, social critique) ofparticipation. They emphasized creating safe environments with constructive critique and allowingstudents to engage deeply in tasks like designing experiments and analyzing data. Using examples like theScience Writing Heuristic approach, the study showed how inquiry-based practices improved criticalthinking, retention, and confidence in science [31
in team-based engineering courses, and her research focuses on equity in communication and collaboration as well as in group design decision making (judgment) under uncertainty. She is especially interested in how power relationships and rhetorical strategies affect group judgment in engineering design; one goal of this work is to to understand factors that inhibit full participation of students who identify with historically marginalized groups and investigate evidence-based strategies for mitigating these inequities. In addition, she is interested in technology and how specific affordances can change the ways we collaborate, learn, read, and write. Teaching engineering communication allows her to apply this work
based on homework assignments, weekly reflection journal entries,and a semester-long group project. The group project tasked students with practicing the human-centered design process to create a technological solution for an accessibility challenge of theirchoice. The project included several milestones: 1. team formation and initial topic proposal, 2.detailed project proposal submission, 3. two project check-ins with the instructor, 4. a midtermprogress report, 5. a 20-minute final presentation, 6. a completed artifact, and 7. a comprehensivefinal report. Peer evaluations were also conducted, allowing team members to assess oneanother’s contributions to the project.3. Research Study To gain a deeper understanding of how students
ideas for theirchildren. During this process, they maintained their roles as co-learners, allowing the children togain agency over their work and build confidence. Thus, parents are important role models andcan directly impact their children’s attitude and interests towards engineering, especially inonline environments where children are not exposed to other peers or adults.Theoretical FrameworkTo explore how families navigate the moments of frustration, we draw on Vygotsky’ssociocultural theory, which emphasizes that children’s learning and development are shapedthrough social interaction with more knowledgeable others [23] who can provide appropriatescaffolds for children to accomplish tasks they cannot yet accomplish independently [24
Your Intended Major?Engineering, Biomedical Engineering, Industrialand System Engineering, Computer Engineering 10%& Computer Science, Electrical Engineering, ElecEOther Engineering Major NOT Listed Above, or 10%Other Major that is Not Engineering. The last two Bi mEoptions allowed participants to write-in responses. 10% 60% Ma eE ChemEOne participant selected Electrical Engineering 10%(labeled in Figure 3 as ElecE), 1 participant MechEselected Biomedical Engineering (labeled inFigure 3 as BiomE), 1 participant selectedMechanical
arespectful term for “interested parties.” Jennifer Tauli Corpuz, from the Kankana-ey Igorot People of MountainProvince in the Philippines, and Stanley Kimaren ole Riamit, an Indigenous peoples’ leader from the PastoralistsMaasai Community in southern Kenya, write a blog on how they are rights holders of their land, not stakeholdersthat need to negotiate their priorities [12], therefore making “stakeholders” a colonial and violent word forindigenous peoples. This change in language has also been adopted by the Center for Disease Control, IndigenousCorporate Training, and Lake Superior State University [13]–[15].the topic of satellite-mega constellations, which are groups of satellites that operate together tocover a vast span of the planet. We also
context.This work uses this operationalization of interest with the understanding that both interest andidentity are not static, rather participants write and rewrite their personal narrative of who theywere, are, and want to be as they evaluate their changing interests [29], [30], [33], [37]. Weextend the current understanding of interest to move beyond the “strength” of an overallengineering interest to include a more nuanced, disciplinary approach. Primary interest refers tothe initial engineering major that engineering students declared when they started their program.When considering how interests change, this establishes a starting focus for participants.Additional disciplinary interest is used to delineate interests that are beyond students
CollectionStudents’ Pre and Post SurveysOn the first day of the engineering camp, the students completed a pre-survey that includeddemographic information and the STEM-CIS (Career Interest Survey) based on the work of Kier,Blanchard, Osborne, & Albert [9]. The STEM-CIS consisted of 44 questions that took the formof a 5-point Likert scale from ‘Strongly Agree’ to ‘Strongly Disagree’. The 44 questions weredivided up into four sets of 11 questions based on the four areas of STEM. An example questionwas “I am interested in careers that involve engineering”.Based on the work of Talton and Simpson [10], four more questions were in the pre-survey in theform of a 5-point Likert scale that looked into peer perceptions of science. An example questionwas, “My best
toosmall to be SL. Thus, the use of SL as aneducational tool, especially in higher education,is to both to teach and to serve in equal measure. Figure 1. Conceptual diagram explaining theConsidering a broad sampling of SL in STEM uniqueness of service-learning (SL).education as provided in peer-reviewed literature, SL has shown beneficial outcomes particularly withregard to the types of learning objectives that have generally been more challenging to achieve in traditionalengineering coursework. These objectives include instruction in ethical responsibility, engineeringsolutions in a global context, and contemporary issues5. SL has documented effectiveness for instructionin related ideas including effective learning of sustainability6, broadened
included in the communitypartnerships with two main foci: middle school robotics leagues and a community makerspace.Two surveys (Pre and Post course) helped to identify initial impressions and changes in students’(1) understanding of community partner’s geographic location, (2) impressions of location, (3)propensity to frequent a business in that location, and (4) knowledge of actual persons residing inthe community. Students were asked to write reflections after S-L site visits which acted asassessments of their growth in understanding of course concepts. The reflections were also usefulto see the students’ perception of professional growth and their perception of the community andtheir impact on it.Initial surveys indicated that news and word of
: Offers a structured methodology for organizing a class with emphasis on constructing an outline, board notes, and out-of-class activities.6,7 (See Fig. 2)VI Writing: Covers fundamentals of making written presentations using the chalk board, vu-graphs, and Powerpoint slides.8VII Speaking: Illustrates effective use of the voice and demonstrates how to stimulate positive emotion using drama, music, humor, and spontaneity in the classroom.9VIII Questioning: Illustrates different student questioning techniques and discusses effective strategies for their use.10IX Teaching Assessment: Covers student, peer and self-assessments and separates myth from fact regarding their usefulness. Introduces
DepoliticizationA number of authors have argued for the value of understanding the discipline andprofession of engineering as a culture4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9. Cech,2 expressing this perspective,writes: Engineering, like other professions, is not just a collection of knowledge, skills, and practices grouped into a set of jobs. Professions have rich and historically- rooted cultures that are built into and around their knowledge, skills, and practices. Professional cultures are the sets of beliefs, myths, and rituals that give meaning to the intellectual content and practices of a profession. (p. 69)Cech goes on to argue that integral to engineering culture are its “cultural ideologies,”that is, “ways of understanding society and
question proved to be the leastcomprehensive, with 6 respondents (21%) indicating “other”. Two of these write-in options maybe added to the revised survey before national dissemination (do not assess; in-class discussions).No individuals in this survey were using an individual standardized assessment method; the lackof use of these instruments may point to the fact that many instructors may not be aware of theseinstruments, perhaps due to lack of formal training in ethics instruction. Alternatively, it mayreflect the difficulty of creating standardized instruments that measure students’ knowledgeand/or attitudes toward macroethical issues and/or a lack of faculty confidence in suchinstruments. These results related to assessment merit a deeper
global accreditation community has affirmedthe importance of educational breadth, in multiple agreements including the Washington Accord,the Sydney Accord, and the Dublin Accord.14 Engineering historian Bruce Seely has noted thecyclical nature of these calls. 15An ABET-funded study on the impact of EC 2000 by Lisa Lattuca and colleagues at the Centerfor the Study of Higher Education at Penn State16 found that 75% of the approximately 150chairs surveyed reported “some” or “significant” increases in emphasis on communication,teamwork, use of modern engineering tools, technical writing, lifelong learning, and engineeringdesign, without significantly impacting technical outcomes. More than half the faculty reportedsimilar gains in these areas in