the Spring" was aimed at sharing stories of success andchallenge from the recently concluded semester. The second session titled "COVID in the Fall" askedparticipants to share plans and concerns about the fall 2020 semester. Other sessions at the 2020Annual Conference which were focused on the pandemic included : • “After COVID-19: The role of Engineering Schools in the Post Pandemic Era” • “Challenges and Potential Solutions for Engineering Education posed by the COVID-19 Pandemic” • “Diversity Roundtable: The Impact of COVID-19 on Underrepresented Engineering Students” • “Diversity Roundtable: COVID-19 Impact on Faculty and Academic Careers”This paper documents the themes that emerged from the two round-table
. Fiveyears of implementation and continuous quality improvement following the inaugurationculminated with ABET accreditation in summer 2020. The degree plan features a four-year spiral curriculum. There is an iterative revisiting ofengineering topics, innovation and entrepreneurship subjects, business acumen, and leadershipengineering themes throughout the courses. The first year introduces core concepts in design,innovation, and entrepreneurship, the second year brings engineering modeling and simulations,and measurements to incorporate technical engineering practices, the third year focuses onentrepreneurship, people, and products, and the capstone year drives innovation in practice,through culminating team-driven projects. The
consumption and efficiency of mill 4. Alternative fuel sources for lime kiln process 5. Heat energy and water efficiency pulp plantThe teams performed research, developed, and designed a proposed plan in which Suzano canbecome more sustainable in the designated sector. This project required the students to gaintechnical knowledge on their sector’s processes and the impact their sector has on the sustainabilityof the company and its goals. The teams then collaborated to innovate new solutions and developa plan for the company to be more sustainable, looking at its resources and needs. They appliedengineering concepts and discussed international policies that impact the company’s sustainablegoals. Teamwork was particularly important for the
teaching workshop to support online and remote instruction.However, in the spring of 2020, as many of us were thrown into a new teaching environmentbecause of COVID restrictions, this became a priority for the university. Most of us had littleexperience or preparation for online or remote teaching. However, the principles of goodteaching have stood the test of time: organize the content, plan the presentation and activities,communicate clearly, create intellectual excitement, and engage students. These principles haveendured for centuries, and they will endure into the “new normal”—whatever that turns out tobe.We embraced this idea at our university, developing a weeklong workshop to prepare faculty forremote and online teaching based on an
thatincorporated the history of rockets and space exploration and arts activities into the physics andengineering design curriculum followed by community presentations at the SAMFA Family Day.With the onset of COVID-19, camp organizers were challenged to deliver a similar outreachprogram to local families given the new confines of health and wellness restrictions. The goals ofthe 2020 camp offerings were for 70 percent of participants to come from underrepresentedminority groups, and for 65 percent of participants to complete their rocket design and build andattend a launch session.COVID ProgramThe planning started with a meeting of camp organizers to discuss alternatives to accommodate thesafety restrictions accompanying the global pandemic. The
engineering ethics, the Fundamentals of Engineering Design 101 instructional team at New Jersey Institute of Technology (NJIT) planned the engineering ethics module in three parts – Part 1 - background theory, Part 2 - a mock debate, and Part 3 – student debate presentations to demonstrate their grasp on the topic. Details of all three parts are given in the table below. Table 1. Engineering Ethics Debate Activity Breakdown [1-4]Activity Breakdown Description (No. of Lectures) • Students were introduced to engineering ethics and ethical dilemma often faced by practicing engineers through real life
the University of Pittsburgh, a center charged with creating a national network for STEM precollege programs and a local network of undergraduate STEM programs designed to broaden participation. Dr. Allen has a Bachelor of Science degree in physics education from Lincoln University of Pennsylvania, a Master of Education degree in policy, planning and evaluation and a Doctor of Education degree, both from the University of Pittsburgh. .Dr. Jennifer Iriti, University of Pittsburgh Jennifer Iriti, Research Scientist and Director of the Evaluation for Learning Group at the University of Pittsburgh, designs and manages mixed-methods evaluations of education initiatives in PK-20 settings to support educational
pilot institution has beencollected and assessed at the institutional, departmental, and for different educator rolesincluding faculty, support staff, and administrative leaders to produce inputs towards developinga detailed plan of action. Early results from baseline data, visualizations, planning responses, andinitial project activities for student work experiences and faculty professional development willbe reported in the submission. The impact of Covid-19 to Year 1 activities will also be discussed.Expected long term results of the project include: development of sustainable mechanisms tofoster cross-sector partnerships; increased student retention and workforce readiness; andmeasurable successes for STEM students, particularly Hispanic
executing the designedexperiment by being prepared and using the limited time wisely. The instructor providesfeedback on a drafted procedure usually during the initial lab period but at least 48 hours prior toperforming the experiment in order to anticipate pitfalls and elicit more details as needed. Thelast learning objective of correctly analyzing the results is assessed in a final presentation. Thechallenge in the spring of 2020 was to translate this to an off-campus experience.The experimental design process changed from pervious semesters because the challenges toimplementing a procedure were different from the controlled lab environment. Previously thestudents had to work with resource and time limitations as well as plan a procedure without
associated resources and efforts needed to complete the work. Inaddition, the format includes a section for ratios and analysis, which is used for testing out theaccuracy of the bid against known benchmarks.The Association for Advancement of Cost Engineering (AACE) is comprised of constructionprofessionals, and the association’s journals are practice-based and practical. The total costmanagement (TCM) framework published by AACE [4] details the fundamental principles andframework that inform how practitioners should practice cost estimating and include thefollowing:1. Plan for cost estimating2. Quantify scope content3. Cost scope content4. Price the cost estimate5. Simulate and optimize costs6. Budget costs7. Analyze cash flow8. Bidding the cost
engineeringstudents in an introduction to engineering course reveals that transfer can be enhanced throughstrategies such as writing-specific feedback and writing focused class activities, thus helpingthese students to see a clearer connection between their first-year composition courses and thewriting they are tasked with in their discipline.This project started as a result of the authors being asked to join an assessment committee todevelop a plan for assessing writing across all programs at West Virginia University Institute ofTechnology. The initial plan for cross-curricular assessment includes English faculty assessingwriting from first-year composition courses and senior capstone courses from a variety ofprograms. This assessment will be used to
participant’s experiencewith the project, but also included some demographic questions. Table 1 lists the questions andtheir respective research questions. A selection of the results organized around three researchquestions from the study is given below:How did the students view this type of activity?For many of the participants, this activity was a new experience for them. Someparticipants revealed that they had prior experience co-planning projects or activitieswith other content areas, however a majority stated that they had limited experience co-planning such intense design projects between content areas. The overall feelings aboutthe project were positive, and the students listed several benefits of the assignment.What problems did the students
that promote the entry and retention of veterans and other non-traditional students in engineering programs 8OneNSF: Expeditions in Education (E- (E-2) willintegrate STEM education R&D to improvelearning for the 21st century. Research-intensive activity Three focus areas: ◦ Transforming UG STEM Learning through S&E ◦ Learning and Understanding Sustainability and Cyberlearning ◦ Data and Observations of STEM Education Timeline: 5-year initiative ◦ FY12: Draft guiding principles. Evaluation planning. ◦ FY13: Issue Dear Colleague Letter. Investment framework. Outcome: Transform the NSF education portfolio into a coordinated and strategic set of
-edge tools to develop solutions to complex systems are a driver toward increased economic development withinproblems in a diversity of industries. It is designed for the state. Further, UL Lafayette’s ability to offer thisindustrial and engineering technologists, and other degree program directly contributes to the accomplishmentprofessionals engaged in developing systems to meet of several of the institution’s objectives articulated in therequired specifications. 2009-2014 Strategic Plan related to (a) increasing the number of graduates in high-demand professions, (b)1. Introduction
Strategic Plan • Council, stakeholders • Structure NIBIB programs, initiatives to align with SP2) Quantitative Metrics of Impact • Data analytics on grants, investigators • Ensure meeting community needs, driving innovation/discovery3) Outreach and Leadership • NIBIB mission essential for Human and Economic health • Define Vision for the Future of Health Engagement Opportunities1) NIBIB Strategic Plan • Council, stakeholders • Structure NIBIB programs, initiatives to align with SP2) Quantitative Metrics of Impact, Outcome • Data analytics on grants, investigators • Ensure meeting community needs, driving innovation/discovery3) Outreach and Leadership • NIBIB mission essential for Human and Economic health
chronologicalsequence of events that led to the realization of the new building. This section also describeshow the building design was driven by faculty needs for experimentation-based courses. Thesubsequent sections provide a course-by-course review recounting the impact of the new facility Page 12.826.2on the courses where it has had the most influence. The paper concludes with a summary of howthe facility has impacted the students’ ability to mesh theory, computation, and experimentationand a discussion of planned curriculum improvements now made possible with the addition ofthe new amenities.Building OverviewThe AXFAB building is a 20,000 square foot
describes three projects and presents some of the lessons learned in forming,orchestrating, and delivering meaningful learning experiences for students from the viewpoint ofthe faculty advisor. Both positive and negative lessons can be found in areas such as projectorganization, management, and ultimately in delivery; proper reconnaissance and trip planning;advisor attitude and expectations and how they may differ from those of the students; andassessment of real-versus-perceived benefits from the perspective of educational benefit to thestudent. We conclude that international, service-learning projects are a valuable pedagogical toolfor educating engineering students when expectations are fully communicated and transparent.Proper assessment of
, Milwaukee School of Engineering LAWRENCE SCHMEDEMAN Larry Schmedeman is a Professor in the Rader School of Business at Milwaukee School of Engineering. He joined the faculty in 1982 and has taught a wide spectrum of courses ranging from economics, finance, management, international business, and business planning. He serves as the Program Director for the International Business bacheloriate program. Educational background: B.S. Education, Bachelor of Management, and MBA.Larry Fennigkoh, Milwaukee School of Engineering LAWRENCE FENNIGKOH, Ph.D. Larry Fennigkoh is currently an Associate Professor in MSOE’s Biomedical Engineering program where he teaches courses in
Prototype New plan New steady state scenario Evaluate Figure 1. Process to manage changeThe requirements for change come from the need for improved products or ways toimplement new technology to deliver them. In either case, the process to define andevaluate exactly what has to be changed is invariably organized as a project. Projectsshould be like children’s stories. They have a beginning, middle and end and have Page 13.1056.2simple, clear content. At least, that’s the intent. Since projects determine the time ittakes
produced during the protocol. A key characteristic of the product design teamswas their use of drawings at every stage of the design process; in contrast the freshmanengineering teams carried out more detailed information gathering activities. These differencesbetween senior product and freshman engineering teams reflected the emphasis areas in theircurriculum. All four teams frequently iterated between the different stages of the design processand project planning was a neglected area for all teams. Further research is needed to increasethe number of team studies to explore the role of design drawings in supporting teamcommunication, team information gathering and use processes, and the role of team diversity insupporting innovative design
two-course, team-based, experimental research capstone sequence. The goal of thedevice design capstone is to advance intellectual property while providing a multidisciplinarydesign experience. In the first course of the sequence, the teams are presented with a clinicalproblem and are expected to conceive, design, prototype and evaluate devices with innovativesolutions. The course emphasizes information gathering, establishing requirements, conceptdevelopment, and evaluation. In the second course in the sequence, a verification plan isgenerated and implemented. The goal of the experimental research capstone sequence is tointroduce students to the design and conduct of a pilot study involving human subjects. To thisend, students develop a
conservation and cogeneration studies for Argonne National Laboratory, and managed flood studies for the Army Corps of Engineers. Wayne's technical expertise is in solid and hazardous waste reduction and management, and natural resource management. He has a BS in engineering from Carnegie-Mellon University, and an MS in civil engineering with an emphasis in regional planning from Northwestern University.Jeffrey Russell, University of Wisconsin - Madison Jeffrey S. Russell, PhD, PE, is professor and chair in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and a co-founder of the Construction Engineering and Management program at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. He has a BS degree in civil
degree were 18% and 10% respectively,compared with 34% of Caucasians3. In addition, the graduation rate for African-Americans andHispanics in Engineering has remained at 11% over the last ten years1. Underrepresentedminority students are also less likely than other ethnic groups to be enrolled in researchinstitutions and instead, a high percentage of them (47%) enroll in two-year institutions. Theintentions of first-year undergraduate students to major in S&E3 are equally alarming. Although9% of these students planned to major in engineering in 2004, only 2%-5% had plans to major inComputer Science. At the graduate level, enrollment in S&E has declined since 2003 mainly as aconsequence of the decline observed in foreign students
Figure 1. Budget for the Microelectronics Processing Lab. The ILI project was over two thirds of the total Microelectronics Processing Lab budget. The Implementation Process as Education We decided early in the planning stages to allow students to be intimately involved with the design ofthe lab. Although it has made the project seem longer, it provided many learning opportunities. For example,in the initial lab design stages, a Materials Engineering student teamed with a Mechanical Engineering studentto design the parameters for the heating, ventilation and air conditioning system. The Materials Engineeringstudent needed to research the processes and materials used in integrated circuit
Planning Dr. David National University7 CS 5247 and Application Hsu Computer Science of Singapore G Electrical Massachusetts CSAIL Robotics: Science Dr. Daniela8 6141 and Systems Rus, et al. Engineering and Institute of G Computer Science
acquired a wealth of abilities and perspectives. Thisskills inventory assessment uncovered many skills including “planning, scheduling, organizing,exploring, controlling, mentoring, communicating, and leading. Other skills … pertained tomanagement … incorporating budgeting, administrating, and allocating scarce resources”(Loendorf1, 2004, p. 2). In order to obtain a similar list from an educator’s point of view, foursenior faculty members in the department were asked to list the skills required of an engineeringprofessor. The results of their skills inventory were actually quite similar. While reviewing theirperceptions they used slightly different terms to describe the skills, however they matched almostexactly the assessment made by an
. Page 11.976.4Dr. Lushington was interested in developing a missionary compound that would contain a freemedical clinic, a home for battered women, a soup kitchen, and an orphanage. The specific tasksincluded a floor plan, site layout, structural design, and foundation design. These tasks met ourcriteria for a viable civil engineering project. In addition, the client wanted the student team tobe sensitive to cultural and economic constraints, which met our criteria for an internationaldesign experience. Communication was not anticipated as a problem since Dr. Lushington wasaccessible by email and English is the national language of Trinidad. Everything seemed to fallinto place even though we knew we were in for some challenges.Launching the
, Columbia. She has taught courses in infrastructure management, planning, transportation and construction management. Dr. Orndoff has more than ten years of engineering field experience. Her application-based engineering research incorporates sustainability, policy, legal issues, economics, decision-making, planning as well as public administration, policy, finance, and their stakeholders. She is active in engineering leadership and management practice issues. She has also served on several professional committees, including the American Society of Civil Engineers, the NSF Transportation Research Board, American Society of En- gineering Educators and economic development initiatives. c
describes the outcomes of a successful program development and approvalprocess and the planned phasing of its implementation. The development team treated the1 Corresponding Author: M. Dyrenfurth, mdyrenfu@purdue.eduexisting program approval mechanisms, as found in most universities and states, as a staged-gate approval process. This necessitated the development of (1) a conceptual proposal, (2) acompetitive analysis, (3) a detailed program plan, (4) an implementation plan, and (5) aformal proposal with supporting data as required by the state coordinating body for highereducation.The program that evolved from this process was an industry-facing, distance/on-campus-hybrid professional doctoral program permitting extensive tailoring of the
efforts related to the Student Experiential Education(SEE) Initiative in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the University of ColoradoBoulder. The SEE Initiative was founded in Spring 2018 and is currently in its first year ofimplementation. The initiative aims to more effectively integrate professional insights andindustry-related connections throughout students’ experience in the department.The SEE Initiative approaches the goal of increased industry/academia integration from twoangles. The first approach focuses on finding opportunities to pull industry into education. Thisapproach includes hosting alumni panels in core classes, using alumni/industry volunteers forrequired student informational interviews, planning networking